Lockheed’s legendary Skunk Works just unveiled a new autonomous wingman for warfighters. Check out their new stealth drone, VECTIS. But will the Air Force want it? And for how much money?
Lockheed says it will be flying in two years and will be compatible with both 5th and 6th Gen fighters. Watch the CGI promo they released below:
An attractive option for future Air Force competitions
“Vectis will provide US and allied warfighters with range, endurance, and multi-mission flexibility, including air-to-air, air-to-surface, and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance,” said OJ Sanchez, president of Skunk Works.
The runway-based, low-maintenance drone is an attractive option for any future competitions the Air Force may request. Sanchez did not elaborate on costs.
Vectis was likely made for the Air Force’s Increment 1 CCA bid (Collaborative Combat Aircraft program) that Lockheed lost, because it was basically considered too high-end at the time. USAF was not interested in all the “bells and whistles”.
Check Out Skunk Works New Stealth Drone VECTIS 3
The company appears to have finished development anyway, and with this announcement, still hopes to get a customer for Vectis. The Air Force has not yet publicly revealed any plans for CCA Increment 2, but Lockheed says Vectis is a great candidate.
Was Vectis Spotted by Satellite at Area 51?
Lockheed won’t elaborate much on the new delta-wing aircraft’s development, but Sanchez did say Vectis is somewhere in size between an F-16 and the company’s new Common Multi-Mission Truck cruise missile.
He did add that Vectis will not fly supersonic.
Photo credit Planet Labs, Inc
Here’s an interesting satellite photo of something that looks similar to Vectis, next to a hangar at Area 51 in 2022:
On 16 September 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued Safety Alert for Operators (SAFO) 25003, telling airlines to step up their safety messaging about one of the most stubborn problems in modern air travel: passengers who try to evacuate with their bags.
The language of the SAFO is clear. The alert “serves to emphasize the operational and safety-critical importance of strict passenger compliance with crewmember instructions during emergency evacuations.” In other words, when the aircraft is on fire or filling with smoke, your roller bag does not matter. Yet, incident after incident has shown that passengers ignore that instruction, creating dangerous bottlenecks and slowing down an evacuation when every second counts.
The FAA Safety Alert Highlights the Risks Behind the Bags
Overhead bins on an aircraft | IMAGE: By User:Mattes – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1732569
Not that they needed to, but the FAA once again highlighted the hazards of retrieving personal belongings and carry-ons in emergency situations.
Passengers hauling bags through the aisles can block exits, trip others, and even puncture evacuation slides. They delay everyone else trying to get out, pushing the evacuation time beyond survivability thresholds. In smoke-filled cabins or amid structural damage, those delays can mean the difference between walking away and not making it out at all.
The agency is asking airlines to review their safety briefings, training, and announcements to make sure the “leave everything behind” message is loud and clear. That includes standardized language in preflight safety demonstrations, stronger exit-row briefings, and even new visuals in airports and boarding areas that drive home the point.
The recommendations also reach into Safety Management Systems, encouraging operators to treat this as a hazard that can be identified, mitigated, and measured. The FAA wants a coordinated approach, from flight attendants’ commands to public awareness campaigns, using everything from universally recognized pictograms to messaging about collective responsibility. The idea is to establish new social norms: everybody leaves their bags behind.
The Problem is Rampant, and Social Media Proves It
This issue has been brewing for some time. However, several high-profile evacuations this year revealed just how deeply ingrained the problem has become.
Passengers evacuate American Airlines Flight 3023 with baggage during an incident at DEN in July 2025 | IMAGE: Social Media Screenshot
Endeavor Flight 4819, a Delta Connection CRJ-900, flipped on landing at Toronto Pearson in February. Twenty-one people were injured, and videos showed passengers clutching their carry-ons as they scrambled away from the wreckage.
American Airlines Flight 1006, a 737-800, caught fire after landing in Denver in March. Passengers slid down evacuation chutes with backpacks and roller bags in hand.
American Airlines Flight 3023, a 737 MAX 8, was evacuated in July after a tire fire in Denver. Again, passengers ignored instructions and took their bags.
Hawaiian Airlines Flight 15, an A330, saw nearly 300 people evacuate in San Diego after a bomb threat in May. Many of them grabbed luggage before sliding down.
Delta Air Lines Flight 1213, another A330, evacuated in Orlando after an engine fire. Baggage was spotted everywhere.
These are just the most visible examples, amplified by social media videos that show in real time how little the safety briefing seems to matter.
The FAA’s recommendations are reasonable, and it is likely that airlines will quickly update cards, announcements, and crew training to reflect the alert. Passengers will hear more direct phrasing, see new visuals, and perhaps even notice safety campaigns in airports. But will that be enough to stop people from reaching for their bags in a crisis?
Frankly, we are not sure. Safety briefings already tell passengers to leave everything behind. Yet in the heat of the moment, instinct seems to take over. Some grab their phones, others their laptops or purses. The result is the same: slower evacuations and more risk for everyone.
Perhaps the threat of stronger consequences would help. Airlines could consider banning passengers who ignore crew commands during emergencies. Regulators might even explore legal penalties. Even without prosecution, the prospect of losing flying privileges could deter at least some offenders.
Our Take: Safety First. Always.
One thing is clear: the current system is not working. Flight attendants have a demanding job, and they repeat the same safety lines hundreds of times each week. Passengers tune out, treating the briefing as background noise. But those words exist for a reason. The announcement about leaving bags behind is not filler. It is a directive that saves lives.
If airlines can find a way to make passengers take that directive seriously, we will all be safer. Whether it is clearer language, stronger visuals, or even consequences for non-compliance, something has to change. Because in an emergency evacuation, the only thing that matters is people.
Marine One executed an emergency landing at a local airfield in England on Thursday, 18 September, delaying President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump’s departure from the United Kingdom by about 20 minutes.
The incident occurred as the presidential helicopter departed Chequers, the country residence of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, following a joint press conference. The helicopter was en route to London Stansted Airport (STN), approximately 64 miles northeast, where Air Force One awaited for the return flight to Washington, D.C.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the details in a statement.
“Due to a minor hydraulic issue, and out of an abundance of caution, the pilots landed at a local airfield before reaching Stansted Airport, where Air Force One was waiting to take them back to Washington,” Leavitt said. “The president and first lady safely boarded the support helicopter.”
Due to a minor hydraulic issue, and out of an abundance of caution, the pilots landed at a local airfield before reaching Stansted Airport.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
The Trumps transferred to a backup helicopter and completed the short hop to STN without further incident, boarding Air Force One shortly after the 20-minute delay.
Stansted, located 42 miles northeast of central London, serves as a preferred gateway for foreign dignitaries visiting the UK. Its expansive facilities and position outside the crowded airspace of Heathrow (LHR) and Gatwick (LGW) provide operational flexibility for high-profile arrivals and departures.
Marine One: Presidential Rotary Transport Abroad
U.S. Marines unload Marine One from a C-17 Globemaster III | IMAGE: US Air Force by Airman 1st Class Briana Cespedes
Marine One designates any US Marine Corps helicopter carrying the president, primarily operated by Marine Helicopter Squadron One (HMX-1) “Nighthawks” from Marine Corps Air Facility Quantico, Virginia. The current fleet includes the Sikorsky VH-3D Sea King, VH-60N White Hawk, and the newer VH-92A Patriot, all featuring the distinctive “White Top” livery.
These helicopters do not fly overseas routes independently. With a range of about 450 miles and top speeds around 160 mph, models like the VH-3D are suited for short- to medium-haul missions, such as White House-to-Camp David transfers. For overseas travel, the aircraft are disassembled and transported aboard US Air Force airlifters, including the C-17 Globemaster III or C-5M Super Galaxy. HMX-1 crews then reassemble and test them on site, deploying with backup units and maintenance support.
HMX-1 Squadron One fleet | IMAGE: US Air Force photo by Rochelle Naus
The squadron maintains 35 helicopters across four types (the three listed earlier, plus MV-22 Ospreys, which are very rarely used for presidential transport), crewed by more than 800 Marines. Operations emphasize security, with formations of up to five identical aircraft serving as decoys, plus countermeasures like chaff, flares, and infrared jammers. Every personnel involved undergoes Yankee White clearance.
Marine One’s Fleet History and Evolution
A VH-34D on the South Lawn of the White House in 1961 | IMAGE: John F. Kennedy Library photo KN-C18018, Public Domain
Presidential helicopter transport began in 1957 with President Dwight D. Eisenhower using a Bell UH-13J Sioux for a short trip to his Pennsylvania summer home. The Sikorsky H-34 followed in 1958, replaced by the VH-3A in 1961. The VH-3D entered service in 1978, joined by the VH-60N in 1987.
Post-9/11 security demands prompted the VXX replacement program. After the 2009 cancellation of Lockheed Martin’s VH-71 Kestrel due to $13 billion in cost overruns, Sikorsky secured a $1.2 billion contract in 2014 for the VH-92A, based on the S-92. The first VH-92A flew as Marine One in August 2024, carrying President Joe Biden in Chicago.
Marine One, with President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush aboard, departing the South Lawn of the White House, 31 October 2008, en route to Camp David | IMAGE: National Archives
HMX-1 also supports senior officials and dignitaries, often linking to Air Force One at bases like Joint Base Andrews. Ground protocols include Marine sentries in dress uniforms, and the squadron’s helos are routinely airlifted–even on standby–for global presidential travel.
Thursday’s precautionary landing marks a rare hiccup for the meticulously-maintained fleet. The last mechanical issue occurred in 2006, when Marine One failed to start for President George W. Bush, forcing a switch to a motorcade.
The President and First Lady departed STN shortly after the brief delay, boarding Air Force One for the transatlantic flight home. Officials attributed the incident to standard precautionary protocols for hydraulic systems.
On 11 September, the desert at Edwards Air Force Base got a little busier. A second B-21 Raider dropped in from Palmdale after what Northrop Grumman called a “robust test flight.” That phrase might read like boilerplate, but for anyone around a flight test squadron, it’s a pretty big deal.
With two flying airframes now on the ramp, the 412th Test Wing’s Combined Test Force finally has the tools to move beyond proving basic airworthiness and start stress-testing what the Raider is really built to do.
A second B-21 Raider, the nation’s sixth-generation stealth bomber, joins flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept. 11, 2025. The program is a cornerstone of the Department of the Air Force’s nuclear modernization strategy, designed to deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. (Courtesy photo)
One aircraft can show you how it flies. Two let you split the workload. With both B-21s assigned to the 420th Flight Squadron at Edwards, one jet can keep pushing the envelope (handling qualities, speed regimes, climb profiles). At the same time, the other dives into the more complex questions of mission systems and weapons integration.
Meanwhile, the ground-test article back at Plant 42 keeps grinding away on structural loads and systems checks. It’s the classic flight test triangle: one bird stretching its wings, one bird proving the electronics and weapons fit, and one airframe taking the punishment on the ground.
With the arrival of the second B-21 Raider, our flight test campaign gains substantial momentum.
Troy Meink, US Air Force Secretary
Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink explained the significance of the second test airframe.
“With the arrival of the second B-21 Raider, our flight test campaign gains substantial momentum,” Meink said. “We can now expedite critical evaluations of mission systems and weapons capabilities, directly supporting the strategic deterrence and combat effectiveness envisioned for this aircraft.”
Building Pace in the Test Program
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony December 2, 2022 in
Palmdale, Calif. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. (U.S. Air Force photo)
The first B-21 arrived at Edwards in November 2023. Since then, it’s been handling both flight and ground testing while also being tied to low-rate initial production. The second airframe frees up the tempo. For the Air Force, that means the program can start moving into integration of critical mission systems sooner. These systems include things like sensors, communications, and weapons interfaces.
General David Allvin, Air Force Chief of Staff, stated why it’s critical to the B-21’s journey to operational readiness.
“The addition of a second B-21 to the flight test program accelerates the path to fielding,” said Allvin. “By having more assets in the test environment, we bring this capability to our warfighters faster.”
By having more assets in the test environment, we bring this capability to our warfighters faster.
General David Allvin, US Air Force Chief of Staff
That sense of speed is intentional. Yes, the B-21 flies farther and quieter. But it’s also about building a bomber that can adapt as fast as the threat environment shifts. That’s where the Raider’s open systems architecture becomes the real story.
Open Architecture and the Software-Defined Bomber
B-21 Raider in flight | IMAGE: US Air Force
From the start, Northrop and the Air Force designed the Raider to be a software-driven aircraft. Its mission systems are built on open architecture, meaning it can integrate new sensors, weapons, and electronic warfare packages without a full redesign. In practical terms, that means software loads can redefine what the jet can do from sortie to sortie.
Northrop has signaled that an enhanced software package is in the works to speed upgrades across the Raider fleet. Instead of waiting years for major block changes, the aircraft is designed to adapt in smaller, faster cycles. Each flight at Edwards now doubles as a systems check, proving how code, avionics, and weapons interfaces line up under operational stress.
Parallel Testing Beyond Flight
U.S. Air Force Airmen with the 912th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron prepare to recover the second B-21 Raider to arrive for test and evaluation at Edwards AFB, Calif., Sept. 11, 2025. The arrival of a second test aircraft provides maintainers valuable hands-on experience with tools, data and processes that will support future operational squadrons. (U.S Air Force photo by Kyle Brasier)
Having two Raiders also allows sustainment testing to start early. It’s not glamorous, but every operator knows the war is won in the hangar as much as in the sky.
Multiple aircraft at Edwards mean maintainers can stress-test tooling, validate technical data, and practice turning jets for back-to-back sorties. They can find out where the bottlenecks are in logistics and where the sustainment documentation falls short. That feedback loop will be critical for the three main operating bases—Ellsworth, Whiteman, and Dyess—where major infrastructure projects are already underway.
Once the Raider is operational, Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma will handle the sustainment enterprise, and the lessons learned at Edwards will shape how that system works in practice.
The Numbers and Comparisons
A second B-21 Raider, the nation’s sixth-generation stealth bomber, joins flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept. 11. The program is a cornerstone of the Department of the Air Force’s nuclear modernization strategy, designed to deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. (Courtesy photo)
It is interesting to note (and many have been surprised by) the size difference between the B-2 and the B-21. The Raider is smaller than the B-2 Spirit but is designed for a more extended range and a lower Radar Cross Section (RCS).
Weapons bay: ~20,000 lb capacity, with overall payload estimates near 30,000 lb
Compare that to the B-2, which spreads 172 feet of wingspan, has a MTOW of 376,500 pounds, and carries a 40,000-pound payload. The B-21’s smaller size means it carries less per sortie, but its stealth profile is sharper, its sustainment simpler, and its unit cost far lower: about $700 million compared to $2 billion for each B-2. The Air Force plans to buy at least 100 Raiders, making fleet size itself a form of combat power.
For context, here’s a snapshot of how the B-21 measures up against its predecessors. The numbers highlight the tradeoffs in size, payload, cost, and survivability that shaped each design.
Aircraft
First Flight
Wingspan
Max Takeoff Weight
Payload
Unit Cost (approx.)
Fleet Size (active/planned)
B-21 Raider
2023
132 ft
~180,000 lb
~30,000 lb
$700M
100+ (planned)
B-2 Spirit
1989
172 ft
376,500 lb
40,000 lb
$2B
19 (active)
B-52 Stratofortress
1952
185 ft
488,000 lb
70,000 lb
$84M (in 1960s dollars; upgraded since)
72 (active)
Notes:
The B-21’s smaller size means less payload per aircraft, but a much lower radar cross section and simpler sustainment.
The Air Force plans a far larger B-21 fleet than the B-2 ever achieved, making massed sorties possible.
The B-52 remains unmatched in payload and endurance but lacks stealth; its longevity reflects continuous upgrades rather than survivability in contested airspace.
Bottom line: the Raider won’t haul like a BUFF or hit as heavy as a Spirit, but it’s built to slip past defenses, upgrade fast, and show up in numbers—that’s what makes it the future of the bomber force.
Strategic Context
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony Dec. 2, 2022, in Palmdale, Calif. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. (U.S. Air Force photo)
The Raider is designed to deliver both nuclear and conventional weapons. It will eventually replace the B-1B Lancer and the B-2 Spirit, and over time, even the venerable (and elderly, yet trustworthy) B-52 Stratofortress. Obviously, that transition won’t happen overnight. Air Force Global Strike Command will keep the current bomber triad flying until the B-21 is fielded in meaningful numbers. But the goal is clear: by 2040, the B-21 will be the backbone of the nation’s long-range strike force.
The program traces back to 2011’s classified Long Range Strike Bomber initiative, with formal development kicking off in 2015. First flight happened on 10 November 2023, and while the Air Force hasn’t announced an initial operational capability date, outside estimates now suggest 2027.
The Air Force revealed the B-21 Raider on 2 December 2022, during an unveiling ceremony hosted and sponsored by the Northrop Grumman Corporation at its production facilities in Palmdale, California.
Why This Arrival Matters
A B-21 Raider conducts flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept 18, 2024. Flight testing includes ground testing, taxiing and flying operations allowing the B-21 to be the backbone of the service’s future bomber force, and will possess the range, access and payload to penetrate the most highly-contested threat environments and hold any target around the globe at risk | IMAGE: US Air Force
The second Raider’s landing at Edwards is significant because it signals that the program is moving from cautious first steps into a faster rhythm. Flight testers can now push more sorties and pull in deeper data with fewer bottlenecks. Maintainers can shape the sustainment playbook early before squadron service begins. Strategists view it as proof that the Air Force is on track to field a sixth-generation stealth bomber before the decade closes.
The B-21 Raider honors the Doolittle Raiders of World War II, who launched a daring strike against Japan in April 1942. The name is fitting. Like its namesake, the Raider is designed to show up where the enemy least expects it. On 11 September 2025, that vision edged a step closer to reality, as the second jet rolled to a stop on the Edwards flight line, waiting for the next round of tests.
Is Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop program canceled? Not exactly.
Back in August 2022, we ran an article about Embraer’s ambitious plan to reinvent the turboprop.
The Brazilian manufacturer was talking big: a modern regional aircraft that would blend the efficiency of a propeller-driven design with the comfort and speed passengers associate with jets. Letters of intent for more than 250 aircraft rolled in at the Farnborough Air Show, and Embraer projected an entry into service by 2028.
It was an exciting time. The regional jet had dominated headlines for years, but the turboprop—long a workhorse of regional connectivity—suddenly looked like it might have a new lease on life.
Fast forward to the end of 2025, and the picture looks very different. What once seemed like the start of a new chapter for regional aviation has now been shelved indefinitely.
A Program Stalled
Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop | IMAGE: Embraer
In June 2025, Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer told Aviation Week that the turboprop program is “on ice”—and not just lightly chilled. “It is quite far down in the freezer at the moment,” he admitted at the Paris Air Show.
It is quite far down in the freezer at the moment.”
Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer, on the status of Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop Program
The reason comes down to technology. The aircraft Embraer envisioned in 2022 promised to be 20% faster and 15% cheaper to operate per seat than current turboprops, while offering a cabin more in line with the company’s E-Jet family. But to achieve those goals, Embraer needed propulsion technology that simply hasn’t materialized.
By the end of 2022, the company had expected to choose between Pratt & Whitney Canada and Rolls-Royce as an engine supplier. That decision never came. In early 2023, Embraer quietly confirmed delays, and by mid-2025, the verdict was clear: without a suitable engine, the program couldn’t move forward.
The Promise Versus the Reality
Rendering of Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop | IMAGE: Embraer
When we first covered the program, Embraer’s roadmap looked ambitious but achievable. To understand how far things have shifted, it’s worth retracing the program’s journey:
2017 — Embraer first proposes the TPNG (Turboprop Next Generation) concept.
July 2022 (Farnborough Air Show) — More than 250 letters of intent announced.
August 16, 2022 — Our AvGeekery feature highlights the disruptive potential.
End of 2022 — Targeted deadline for engine selection.
Early/Mid-2023 — Planned program launch.
2028 — Entry into service for first variant (50- or 90-seat).
2029 — Second variant to follow.
June 2025 (Paris Air Show) — Program officially “on ice.”
By contrast, as 2025’s end approaches quickly, the reality is stark: no engine has been selected, no program launched, and any hope of an entry into service before the 2030s now looks remote.
Embraer’s Shift in Focus
Embraer’s next-gen turboprop program is “on ice,” in favor of enhancements to the E175 and E190/195 programs | IMAGE: Embraer
With the turboprop shelved, Embraer has turned its attention back to the jets that have carried its commercial success for the past two decades.
The E175-E1 is getting avionics and cabin upgrades, such as improved weather radar, larger overhead bins, and mood lighting. These upgrades are designed to keep it competitive in the US regional market, where scope clauses still restrict the use of heavier E2 variants.
The E190-E2 and E195-E2 continue to anchor Embraer’s commercial lineup. They benefit from cockpit commonality with the E175-E1 and appeal to airlines seeking efficient sub-150-seat jets.
Future possibilities, such as E195-E1 freighter conversions, are being discussed but not yet formalized.
Meijer has been clear: Embraer isn’t walking away from regional aviation. It’s just choosing to invest in incremental improvements to its jets rather than roll the dice on an all-new turboprop.
The Market That Got Away—for Now
Embraer’s next-gen turboprop program is “on ice,” favoring its regional jets | IMAGE: Embraer
The irony is that Embraer was targeting a genuine gap in the market. Since the pandemic, smaller US cities have lost air service as 50-seat jets disappeared from fleets. As Meijer noted this year: “I definitely see a demand in the US for between smaller cities since that segment is shrinking.”
I definitely see a demand in the US for between smaller cities, since that segment is shrinking.
Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer
But who will step up to meet that demand?
Boeing and Airbus have no plans to reenter the turboprop market. The Airbus A220 is a strong performer, but too large for many smaller communities.
ATR is sticking with incremental updates to the ATR 42 and 72, opting against a clean-sheet design.
Bombardier and de Havilland are out of the commercial turboprop game.
China and Russia are unlikely to make inroads in Western markets anytime soon.
That leaves Embraer. And yet, for now, Embraer is content to sit it out.
Forecasts Reset
Embraer’s 20-year outlook for <150 pax aircraft | IMAGE: Embraer
Embraer’s own 2025 Market Outlook reflects this retrenchment. The company now projects global demand for about 10,500 sub-150-seat aircraft through 2044, of which only 1,780 are expected to be turboprops. That’s a marked drop from earlier forecasts of more than 2,100.
The reasons are clear: engine technology isn’t ready, certification risks are high, and airlines in North America and Europe are leaning more toward regional jets than turboprops.
Still, in markets like Asia-Pacific and emerging economies, the economics of turboprops remain attractive. The demand hasn’t disappeared—it’s just waiting for the right aircraft to capture it.
Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop Remains Disruptive, But Not for the Right Reason
IMAGE: Embraer
When we first covered Embraer’s next-gen turboprop in 2022, it was billed as a program that could redefine regional aviation. The numbers looked strong, the interest was genuine, and the momentum was building.
Three years later, the narrative has shifted dramatically. The turboprop program isn’t dead, but it’s “quite far down in the freezer,” as Arjan Meijer put it. The gap in the market is still there, the demand is still real, but the aircraft that was supposed to meet it remains frozen in development limbo.
For now, Embraer is focused on what it already does best: refining the E-Jet family and extending its commercial success in the sub-150-seat jet market. Whether the company eventually returns to turboprops will depend not just on Embraer’s ambition, but on whether propulsion technology can catch up with its vision.
And so, Embraer’s next-gen turboprop remains exactly what we called it in our first article: disruptive. Only this time, the disruption is the absence of progress, leaving a hole in the regional market that no one else seems ready to fill.
The last flight lands: JetBlue retires its final E190 with a JFK–Boston service, closing nearly 20 years of operations.
A small jet, a big legacy: The E190 shaped JetBlue’s network and gave passengers mainline comfort on short-haul routes.
Still flying strong abroad: From Alliance Airlines in Australia to KLM Cityhopper in Europe, the E190 remains a global workhorse.
A new US chapter begins: Less than 24 hours after JetBlue said goodbye, Avelo Airlines placed a massive order for the E195-E2, marking the type’s American debut.
JetBlue Airways closed the book on an era this week.
Flight 190, operating on Tuesday, 9 September, from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) to Boston Logan International Airport (BOS), touched down and marked the official retirement of the Embraer E190 from JetBlue’s fleet.
The route JetBlue Flight 190 operated for its final E190 flight on 9 Sept 25 | IMAGE: FlightAware
On a beautiful early September morning, the ceremonial final flight departed JFK at 1240 local time and arrived at BOS at 1338 local time–nearly 30 minutes early. In a fitting tribute to the type, the flight was piloted by Warren Christie, JetBlue COO and pilot, who also flew the inaugural E190 flight for JetBlue two decades ago.
The retirement of the E190 was a bittersweet moment for JetBlue. The type was the carrier’s oldest and smallest aircraft, but it was important in shaping its early identity, expanding its reach, and proving that “low-cost” and “premium” could coexist on short-haul routes.
And yet, less than 24 hours after JetBlue said goodbye, another US carrier signaled a different future. Avelo Airlines announced a blockbuster order for the Embraer E195-E2, becoming the first American airline to commit to the next generation of E-Jets. For Embraer, it was the break they’ve been waiting for for years: the E2 is coming to America.
A Brazilian Design That Redefined the Middle Market
JetBlue was the launch customer for the E190 in 2005 | IMAGE: JetBlue
When Embraer launched the E190 program in the late 1990s, it sought to fill the wide gap between regional jets and narrowbodies. Instead of stretching the ERJ-145, the Brazilian manufacturer went clean-sheet, unveiling the E-Jet family at the 1999 Paris Air Show. The 100-seat E190 emerged as the centerpiece, equipped with a stretched fuselage, twin General Electric CF34-10E turbofan engines, and a range up to 2,819 nautical miles.
The type first flew in March 2004 and entered service a year later after FAA certification. The E190’s formula—mainline comfort in a right-sized package—caught on quickly. The 2-2 cabin, absence of middle seats, and generous overhead bins won over passengers, while its economics appealed to airlines targeting underserved markets.
Globally, the aircraft became a commercial success, with more than 500 delivered. The 566th, 567th, and 568th airframes were delivered to Egyptian wet-lease carrier, CIAF Leasing, in December 2022. Its later successor, the E2 series, brought geared turbofans and 20% better efficiency. However, the original E190, now two decades old, continues to serve as a reliable backbone for many international operators.
JetBlue and the E190: A Partnership That Paid Off
A JetBlue Embraer 190, N337JB, at Providenciales Airport, Turks & Caicos (PLS). Awaiting departure to Fort Lauderdale (FLL) | IMAGE: Sunnya343 – CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
No US airline was more closely associated with the E190 than JetBlue. In 2003, the young New York carrier stunned the industry with an order for 100 of the type, making it the global launch customer. Founder David Neeleman envisioned a jet that could open secondary markets without sacrificing JetBlue’s signature product.
The first E190 joined the fleet in September 2005. Two months later, it launched scheduled service between BOS and JFK—the same route that marked its retirement this week. The milestone flight was a fitting bookend to two decades of service.
Configured with 100 leather seats, live TV, free Wi-Fi, and 32 inches of pitch, the E190 allowed JetBlue to grow beyond major trunk routes. It became the backbone of service to mid-sized cities like Rochester, Buffalo, and Burlington, while also flying shuttles in the congested Northeast corridor. At its peak, more than 60 E190s operated over 100 daily flights, introducing millions of travelers to JetBlue’s distinct onboard product.
“The E190 was instrumental in our early years and proved to deliver on critical connectivity in short-haul markets, allowing us to grow into new regions, especially in our New York and Boston focus cities,” said Christie. “It is an honor to pilot our final E190 revenue flight.”
It is an honor to pilot our final E190 revenue flight.
Warren Christie, JetBlue COO and captain of both the inaugural and final JetBlue E190 flight
The jet earned a reputation among pilots and crews for solid handling and quick turnarounds. Its fly-by-wire controls and Honeywell Primus Epic avionics made it well-suited for the busy Northeast corridor. Many pilots described the E190 as “a pilot’s airplane”—responsive in congested airspace, nimble on approach, and efficient on the ground.
Still, the aircraft was not without headaches. Early CF34 engine issues required fixes, and maintenance costs mounted as the fleet aged into its mid-teens. Even so, the type’s contribution to JetBlue’s growth–not to mention its reputation for bringing humanity back to air travel–remains undeniable.
Why Retire the E190 Now?
IMAGE: JetBlue
The decision comes down to economics and efficiency. Fuel costs have climbed, older airframes need more upkeep, and replacement parts for the CF34 engines are harder to come by. On a per-seat basis, the E190 burns roughly 25% more fuel than its replacement, the Airbus A220-300.
JetBlue is now focused on a simplified fleet of Airbus aircraft. The A220-300, with 140 seats, longer range, and lower emissions, is already taking over many of the routes the E190 once flew. With more than 50 delivered so far, the transition is well underway. Beyond fuel savings, the move reduces pilot training complexity, streamlines maintenance, and positions JetBlue for growth across both short-haul and transcontinental markets.
Selling off retired E190s to lessors and aftermarket specialists has also unlocked value. Firms like Azorra and Werner Aero are acquiring frames and engines, many of which will find second lives overseas.
In addition to its 52 A220-300s, JetBlue operates 125 A320-200s, 63 A321-200s, and 37 A321neos.
The E190’s Place in the Aviation World in 2025
IMAGE: JetBlue
JetBlue’s retirement of the E190 closes the book on the type’s US mainline story. Once a familiar sight shuttling between New York, Boston, and dozens of secondary cities, the aircraft has now vanished from the scheduled fleets of major American carriers. Regional affiliates still operate the smaller E170 and E175, constrained by scope clauses, but the 100-seat E190 has slipped quietly into the margins.
Breeze Airways, which leaned on ex-Azul examples in its startup years, has already shifted its attention to the Airbus A220. A few E190s live on in charter service or as VIP Lineage 1000 conversions, but their heyday in the US is clearly over.
The picture looks different abroad. Alliance Airlines keeps dozens flying on regional contracts in Australia, many sourced from JetBlue and other US retirements. Aeroméxico Connect continues to rely on its fleet for domestic connectivity, while KLM Cityhopper and Airlink in South Africa use the type to stitch together busy short-haul networks. China and Latin America also remain strongholds, where the E190’s size and economics are still well-matched to market demand.
Meanwhile, the next generation is taking root. The E2 family—most visibly with Porter Airlines in Canada and Azul in Brazil—builds on the original E-Jet’s strengths, offering better fuel efficiency and longer range while keeping the comfort and feel of a larger airplane in a smaller frame. And, the massive deal announced one day after JetBlue’s final E190 flight, the E195-E2 will be making its debut in the United States very soon.
Avelo’s landmark order is for 50 E195-E2s, with rights to 50 more worth nearly $4.4 billion at list prices. Deliveries are set to begin in 2027, Deliveries will start in 2027, making Avelo the launch customer for the E2 family in America. For Embraer, it’s a much-welcomed sign that while the first-generation E190 is fading at home, its successor is finally making inroads.
One Door Closes…Another One Opens
A lineup of JetBlue E190s in desert storage | IMAGE: JetBlue
JetBlue’s E190 era has officially come to an end. But its impact is unmistakable: it opened new markets, gave the airline flexibility when it was most needed, and delivered a passenger experience that often felt bigger than the plane itself.
As the final jets head off to desert storage, they leave behind a lasting legacy: a small jet that made a big impact…even as the next generation prepares to take flight.
Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal makes it the first U.S. carrier to order Embraer’s largest jet, a $4.4B move set to reshape its fleet from 2027.
In a move few saw coming, Avelo Airlines has made headlines today by placing a firm order for 50 Embraer E195-E2 aircraft with purchase rights for 50 more, in a deal valued at $4.4 billion at list prices.
Deliveries are scheduled to begin in the first half of 2027.
With this announcement, Avelo becomes the launch customer for the E2 family in the United States. Avelo’s decision to bet on the E2 family is a milestone that Embraer has been working toward since the program’s inception.
The E195-E2 gives the Houston-based low-cost carrier a flexible tool to balance growth, efficiency, and network development. Since its launch in 2021, Avelo has built a business model around connecting underserved markets with low fares and reliable service. The airline has relied exclusively on Boeing 737NGs, an older jet that has served them well, but not always the right fit for smaller markets or shorter routes. The E2 fills that gap.
Avelo Airlines E195-E2 Deal is a Step Toward Flexibility and Efficiency
Artist rendering of an Avelo Airlines E195-E2 over New York | IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
The E195-E2 is Embraer’s largest commercial jet, offering up to 132 seats in a single-class configuration. What makes it stand out is not just its size but its performance package. Equipped with Embraer’s proprietary Enhanced Takeoff System (E2TS), the aircraft can operate from shorter runways than many of its peers. For Avelo, that opens opportunities at constrained airports where the 737 may be challenged. It also allows the airline to consider markets with limited infrastructure or stricter performance requirements.
The E195-E2 also burns far less fuel per trip than comparable aircraft, while also producing a smaller noise footprint.
Avelo’s bet is that the E2’s economics and performance will not only keep costs in check but also allow it to expand into markets that larger narrowbodies can’t serve profitably.
Customer Experience in Focus
IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
From the passenger perspective, the E195-E2 offers several advantages that could give Avelo a strategic advantage in the highly competitive low-cost sector. The cabin features a two-by-two seating layout, eliminating the dreaded middle seat. Overhead bins are larger than those found on many regional jets, power outlets are available at every seat, and the aircraft is noticeably quieter than older-generation narrowbodies.
“We are thrilled to partner with Embraer and bring this best-in-class small narrowbody airplane to the United States marketplace,” said Andrew Levy, Avelo’s founder and CEO. “Our customers will love the E2’s comfortable seating, in-seat power ports, large overhead bins, and quiet cabin. The aircraft’s exceptional performance, size, and efficiency make it the perfect choice for the future growth of our scheduled service network.”
A Milestone for Embraer
An E195-E2 from below: high wing aspect ratio and single slotted flaps | IMAGE: By Matti Blume – CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
The Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal is the milestone moment Avelo has been waiting for for years.
The E2 family, which includes the E190-E2 and E195-E2, has been in service for several years with carriers in Latin America, Europe, and Asia. However, cracking the US market has been an elusive goal. Competing against Boeing and Airbus in their home turf has never been easy, and Embraer has had to contend with the strong momentum of Airbus’s A220 program, which has already gained traction with carriers like Delta, Breeze, and JetBlue.
IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
“Avelo complements its narrowbody fleet with the best-in-class E195-E2,” said Arjan Meijer, President and CEO of Embraer Commercial Aviation. “Its exceptional fuel efficiency, quiet operations, and short-field capability will unlock new markets and optimize capacity across its network — all with a cabin that passengers truly love.”
The E2’s success in the United States may hinge on proving that “right-sized” aircraft can deliver consistent profitability in a market where larger jets often dominate. Industry analysts have long debated the viability of smaller narrowbodies in the fleets of U.S. carriers. Some see them as a complication, requiring separate pilot training, simulators, and maintenance programs. Others argue that the efficiency of aircraft like the E195-E2 provides an edge in markets where bigger isn’t always better.
Will the Avelo Airlines E195-E2 Deal Start an Embraer Revolution in the US?
Embraer E195-E2 prototype, seen from front, showing its gull wing | IMAGE: Clemens Vasters CC BY 2.0, https://commons., ikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=60298967
The timing of Avelo’s order is notable. The airline industry is in a period of adjustment as carriers balance fleet renewal with cost control and environmental goals. Boeing continues to face challenges with its 737 MAX program, while Airbus’s order book for the A320neo family is stretching well into the next decade. That dynamic gives Embraer room to carve out a niche for the E2.
Avelo, with its point-to-point model and focus on underserved cities, is well-positioned to put the E195-E2’s capabilities to the test. If the strategy works, it could encourage other US carriers to revisit the economics of adding smaller narrowbodies to their fleets.
The first aircraft are expected to join Avelo’s fleet in 2027, but today’s announcement already feels like a turning point. Embraer has been waiting for the long-awaited validation of the E2 program in the United States, and with this announcement, it has finally happened. For Avelo, which is still a very young carrier trying to find its place in the aviation landscape, it is both a growth opportunity and a statement of intent: that a young, nimble carrier can think differently about fleet strategy and use it as a lever for expansion.
At 50 firm orders and up to 100 total, the Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal is one of the largest commitments Embraer has seen in years. Whether it opens the floodgates for more US carriers to consider the E2 program remains to be seen.
For now, though, Avelo has placed itself firmly at the center of attention and given Embraer a powerful foothold in the American market.
The Navy’s Modified Liberators Flew Long Lonely and Productive Missions All Over the World
The Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateer is a World War II and Korean War era US Navy patrol bomber that evolved from the ConsolidatedB-24 Liberator. The Navy used unmodified B-24s as the PB4Y-1 Liberator. Although successful, the Navy wanted a fully navalized design, and Consolidated, beginning with the B-24 aircraft, developed a dedicated long-range patrol bomber designated PB4Y-2 Privateer.
Conslidated PB4Y-2 Privateer Patrol Bomber
Ford Motor Company, building B-24s under contract, demonstrated that a tall, single vertical stabilizer and rudder improved aircraft handling. The result was a basic B-24 aircraft with a single vertical stabilizer. It was also stretched seven feet longer to accommodate a terrain mapping radar and a radar operator station. Defensive armament was increased to 12 M2 Browning machine guns in six turrets (two dorsal, two waist, nose, and tail).
The B-24’s ventral, retractable ball turret was omitted. The Navy also selected non-supercharged Pratt and Whitney R1830 engines (1350 hp) that were more efficient at lower patrol altitudes.
Figure 1 The Consolidated B-24 Airframe that was modified to produce the PB4Y-2 Privateer.
Delivery began in 1944, in time for several squadrons to see service toward the end of World War II. The aircraft performed reconnaissance, search and rescue, and anti-shipping roles. Anti-shipping missions often used the BAT radar-guided glide bomb. The Navy eventually took delivery of 739 Privateers; the majority were delivered after the end of the war.
A Consolidated B-24 Liberator from Maxwell Field, Alabama, four engine pilot school, glistens in the sun as it makes a turn at high altitude in the clouds. Heavy Bombers
Operational History
The Privateer entered Navy service in late 1944, and the operational flights began in early March 1945, flying sectored anti-shipping searches out of the Philippines. The surrender of Japan in mid-1945 temporarily halted the operational flights of the PB4Y-2. They would later be used during the Korean War to drop parachute illumination flares to detect North Korean and Chinese infiltrators from the sea.
PB4Y-2 Privateer at the Naval Aviation Museum, Pensacola, Florida
The Navy also used the Privateer for signals intelligence (SIGINT) off the coasts of China and Russia during the early days of the Cold War. Designated P4Y-2 aircraft—indicating they were no longer bomber capable—a P4Y-2 was shot down in April 1950 over the Baltic Sea by Soviet fighters. Privateers also saw service as typhoon hunters through the mid-1950s. One typhoon hunter had mechanical troubles and tried to land on the island of Bataan, but crashed. A few retired aircraft were used as drones and re-designated QP-4B.
Except for a few Coast Guard aircraft and aircraft supplied to the Republic of China, US Navy PB4Y-2 aircraft were out of service and retired by 1954.
Life After the Military
I was introduced to the former Navy Patrol Bomber PB4Y-2 at the Museum of Flight and Aerial Firefighting in Greybull, Wyoming.
As the Privateers were phased out of military service in the 1950s, many were purchased by aerial firefighting companies. The guns and military equipment had been removed, and tanks were installed to carry fire retardant to fight forest fires.
In 1970, Hawkins and Powers, an aerial firefighting company in Greybull, Wyoming, replaced the lower-powered Pratt & Whitney engines with Wright 1700 hp R2600s (taken from surplus B-25 bombers). The R2600s were more readily available and easier to maintain. Although rated at an additional 350 hp, the engines could not be operated at full power because the Privateer was limited to is original horsepower rating. The fact that the engines could be operated at lower power settings also prolonged the life of the engines.
Proven Firefighter
The firefighting exploits of the PB4Y-2/P4Y-2, along with several other aircraft, are being preserved at the Museum of Flight and Aerial Firefighting in Greybull, Wyoming. We happened on the museum as we were traveling from Yellowstone National Park along US 20, approaching Greybull, Wyoming. (Note: “PB4Y-2” was the designation for the original “patrol bomber.” When the aircraft were stripped of weapons and bombing capability, they were re-designated as “P4Y-2.” These aircraft were originally designated PB4Y-2.)
Figure 2 P4Y-2, Firefighter 126, on the Flight Line of the Aerial Firefighting Museum
Here, visitors have direct access to several different firefighting aircraft, including the interiors and cockpits. There are two modified Privateers on display—numbers 126 and 127. Stripped of all weaponry and any non-essential equipment, the interiors are truly spartan. The fire-retardant tanks are mounted below the main floor.
P4Y-2 Firefighter 126 in Action
In addition to fire-retardant tanks and new engines, the original cockpit canopies were replaced with a one-piece canopy for better visibility in the smoky, crowded firefighting environment. As a firefighting aircraft, the P4Y-2 carried 2,400 gallons of fire retardant in four tanks. All four tanks could be emptied simultaneously to hit hot spots or in sequence to create an extended fire line.
P4Y-2 Firefighter 123 on the Greybull Flightline During Firefighting Season. This aircraft and its crew were lost in 2002
Many Privateers served as aerial firefighters over a period of 43 years. Their use ended abruptly in 2002, when several crashes led to the retirement of all World War II aircraft from federal firefighting operations. P4Y-2 number 123, operated by Hawkins and Powers Aviation, broke up in flight while fighting a wildfire. Both crew members were killed in the accident. Following the accident, the FAA grounded all remaining Privateers. There is a monument memorializing the crew on the museum’s flight line.
Memorial to two Firefighting Aircraft and Crews lost in 2002. T123 was the P4Y-2 shown above.
At last report, there is only one Privateer aircraft still airworthy. The aircraft is based in Casa Grande, Arizona. Watch it in action during Oshkosh 2025 in this video:
Non-airworthy examples of the Consolidated PB4Y-2 Privateer aircraft can be seen on static display at several museums across the United States, including:
National Museum of Naval Aviation in Pensacola, Florida.
Pima Air & Space Museum in Tucson, Arizona.
Yanks Air Museum in Chino, California.
Michigan Flight Museum (formerly Yankee Air Museum) in Belleville, Michigan.
Museum of Flight and Aerial Firefighting in Greybull, Wyoming (multiple aircraft).
The National WWII Museum in New Orleans, Louisiana (nose section only, displayed as a B-24D).
Number P4Y-2 Number 127, a Sister Ship to 126. Note the Bubble Canopy and different Nose Configuration from 126.
Editor’s Note: This story first appeared on Avgeekery in September 2017 and has been updated with new information since it was originally published.
Thirty-one years have passed since the harrowing crash of USAir Flight 427 on the evening of 8 September 1994.
I remember that evening with piercing clarity.
It was a Thursday, one of those golden late-summer evenings in western Pennsylvania—warm, gentle, a faint haze hanging in the sky. I’d been playing outside with friends after school, not a care in the world. Erie, my hometown, sat about two hours north of Pittsburgh, and on that evening, everything felt calm, ordinary, safe.
Then the ordinary shattered.
The front page of the Erie Daily Times from Erie, PA, on Friday, 9 Sept. 1994, the day after the crash of USAir Flight 427
When I came inside and flipped on the television, the mood in the room changed instantly. Every local station carried the same banner: breaking news, a plane down near Pittsburgh. The weather had been flawless, so the words felt surreal, impossible. And when the anchor said it was a USAir flight from Chicago, my heart stopped. My dad was supposed to be flying home from Chicago that very night, connecting through Pittsburgh.
For a few agonizing minutes, time warped. My mind raced, my hands trembled as I dialed the airline’s 800 number—back then, there were no cell phones or websites to offer instant answers. Those minutes stretched like an eternity, until finally, blessedly, I heard the words: he wasn’t on that flight. Relief washed over me in a tidal wave.
But relief would not come for so many others. For 132 families, the phone brought only silence or words too heavy to bear. Their lives, in that moment, split into a before and an after. Their loved ones were aboard USAir Flight 427.
For them, nothing would ever be the same again.
A Sudden, Violent Descent
Crater on the hillside from the impact of USAir Flight 427 | IMAGE: KDKA
Flight 427 was a routine evening service from Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) to Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), operated by a Boeing 737-300 (reg. N513AU). The 55-minute trip was uneventful until the final minutes of descent.
Approaching PIT, Flight 427 was in sequence behind Delta Flight 1083, a Boeing 727, on the same arrival path. Radar data from that night confirmed that spacing was safe at more than four miles apart. At 6,000 feet and roughly 190 knots, the crew acknowledged instructions for the downwind approach for runway 28 right. Then, without warning, the aircraft jolted violently…at about the same time as it entered the wake turbulence of the preceding Delta jet. A series of thumps rattled the cabin as the 737 suddenly rolled hard to the left.
The autopilot snapped off. First Officer Charles Emmett, reacting instantly, slammed a rudder pedal, but the system betrayed him, forcing the rudder hard in the opposite direction. Captain Peter Germano and Emmett fought back with all they had, pulling the yokes right and back, trying to hold the nose up as the stick shaker buzzed its stall warning.
In the cockpit, strain and confusion filled the airwaves. “Hold on!” Germano shouted, again and again. “What the hell is this?”
Under crushing G-forces, his co-pilot gasped, “Oh shit!” Their final desperate command was one word: “Pull!”
At 1903 local time, just 28 seconds after the first jolt, the jet plunged nose-first into a wooded ravine in Hopewell Township, only seven miles from the runway. Traveling at nearly 300 miles per hour, the impact obliterated the aircraft instantly. There were no survivors.
On the ground, people gathered at a nearby soccer field watched in horror as the 737 seemed to fall straight from the sky, followed by fire, silence, and a column of black smoke.
Black smoke rises from the crash site of USAir Flight 427 in the immediate aftermath of the disaster | IMAGE: CBS News
A Tragedy Without Explanation
What baffled investigators was the absence of any warning. The weather was clear. The crew made no distress call. The 737 had no history of catastrophic structural failures. Yet the flight data recorder showed a sudden, uncommanded left roll, one that the pilots could not overcome.
Flight 427 was not the first Boeing 737 to fall from the sky this way.
In 1991, United Airlines Flight 585 had crashed in Colorado Springs under nearly identical circumstances. With no apparent cause, the NTSB had reluctantly declared that crash “undetermined.”
Now, with another 737 lost in almost the same way, the possibility of a systemic flaw raised alarm bells in the aviation community.
Crash Facts: USAir Flight 427
Date: Thursday, 8 September 1994
Flight: USAir 427
Route: Chicago O’Hare (ORD) → Pittsburgh International (PIT)
Aircraft: Boeing 737-3B7 (N513AU)
Occupants: 132 (127 passengers, 5 crew)
Fatalities: 132 (no survivors)
Crash Site: Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania — 7 miles northwest of PIT
Timeline:
1903 hrs local time – Flight cleared to descend through 6,000 ft, acknowledged slowdown to 190 knots.
Seconds later – Aircraft rolled sharply left, entered an unrecoverable dive.
Impact – Nose-first at nearly 300 mph; massive explosion and fire.
Investigation Length: 4 years, 6 months (longest in NTSB history at that time)
Probable Cause: Uncommanded rudder deflection due to jammed servo valve in the rudder power control unit (PCU).
Legacy: Led to redesign of the 737 rudder system, FAA-mandated fleet modifications, and enhanced pilot training.
A Flaw in the Rudder
The investigation into Flight 427 would become the longest in NTSB history at that time. For more than four years, experts dissected wreckage, ran wind-tunnel tests, and simulated failure scenarios.
The reversal theory diagram | IMAGE: FAA via St. Petersburg Times
The cause was traced to the 737’s rudder power control unit, or PCU—the hydraulic system that converts a pilot’s foot movements into rudder action. At its core was a dual servo valve, a precision part designed to direct fluid one way or the other. But under rare circumstances, the valve’s inner slide could stick inside the outer slide. When that happened, the rudder moved in the opposite direction of what the pilots commanded.
Investigators believed that’s exactly what happened to Flight 427. The pilots commanded a right rudder to steady the aircraft; instead, the rudder deflected left. At low altitude and airspeed, recovery was impossible.
Linking the Cases
Recovered wreckage from USAir Flight 427 inside a hangar at Pittsburgh International Airport | IMAGE: Public Domain
The loss of Flight 427 finally confirmed what had long been suspected after the crash of United Airlines Flight 585 in Colorado Springs in 1991. In both cases, Boeing 737s suddenly rolled out of control and plunged to the ground with no warning and no clear cause. At the time, investigators had been forced to label United 585’s cause “undetermined,” a deeply unsatisfying conclusion for both regulators and the families of those lost.
Flight 427’s similarities were impossible to dismiss. Both jets had been in stable approaches, both encountered sudden left rolls, and in both cases, the crews were unable to recover. The circumstantial evidence pointed squarely toward a rudder system failure. What had been a troubling anomaly in 1991 now appeared to be a repeat event.
The circumstantial evidence pointed squarely toward a rudder system failure. What had been a troubling anomaly in 1991 now appeared to be a repeat event.
The final piece of the puzzle came in 1996 with Eastwind Airlines Flight 517, a 737-200 traveling from Trenton-Mercer Airport (TTN) in New Jersey to Richmond International Airport (RIC) in Virginia, which experienced the same uncommanded rudder deflection. However, unlike the earlier flights, the pilots managed to wrestle the aircraft back under control and land safely. Their testimony provided investigators with something they had not had before: living witnesses who described the exact feel of a rudder reversal in real time.
The pattern was undeniable, with three cases spanning five years. In March 1999–nearly five years after the disaster– the NTSB issued its final report on Flight 427, concluding that a rudder malfunction caused the crash. It also amended the probable cause of United 585 to reflect the same finding. The evidence was no longer circumstantial but conclusive.
Boeing expedited redesign of the 737 rudder system, and the FAA mandated modifications for every aircraft in the fleet worldwide. What began as scattered, tragic mysteries had crystallized into a definitive safety breakthrough.
The Rudder Mystery Cases
United Airlines Flight 585 Date: 3 March 1991 Aircraft: Boeing 737-200 Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado Fatalities: 25 Notes: Crashed during approach after an uncommanded left roll. With no clear evidence at the time, the NTSB declared the cause “undetermined.”
USAir Flight 427 Date: 8 September 1994 Aircraft: Boeing 737-300 Location: Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania (near Pittsburgh) Fatalities: 132 Notes: Nearly identical circumstances to United 585. The crash became the turning point that confirmed rudder malfunction as a systemic flaw.
Eastwind Airlines Flight 517 Date: 9 June 1996 Aircraft: Boeing 737-200 Location: En route from Trenton, New Jersey, to Richmond, Virginia Fatalities: None (all aboard survived) Notes: Experienced a sudden, uncommanded roll, but the crew regained control and landed safely. Pilot testimony provided investigators with the first live account of rudder reversal.
Lessons Carried Forward
Delivered to USAir on 8th October 1987 as N382AU. Became N513AU on 10th November 1988. Due to a loss of control due to rudder malfunction on 8th September 1994, this aircraft crashed near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, USA. Unfortunately, no one survived. |
By Paul Denton, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=147662580
For the families of those lost on Flight 427, answers did not come quickly. The investigation stretched across more than four years, with multiple competing theories debated before the rudder system was confirmed as the cause. Many families became advocates, pressing relentlessly for transparency, funding, and continued technical work. Their persistence kept the investigation alive through periods when progress seemed stalled, and their voice was instrumental in ensuring the NTSB stayed the course.
Flight 427 forever reshaped the way complex accidents were approached. In the early 1990s, crash investigations often focused heavily on the specific circumstances of a single event. What 427 demonstrated was the need to connect data across multiple cases. United 585, USAir 427, and Eastwind 517 could not be solved in isolation, but when viewed together, a consistent pattern emerged. This practice of cross-case analysis became a model for later investigations.
The case also highlighted the importance of high-fidelity testing. Engineers subjected the 737 rudder system to exhaustive hydraulic and thermal tests, simulating conditions that were not considered in earlier certification standards. Advanced flight simulators were employed to recreate the exact aerodynamic loads, cockpit inputs, and upset sequences, giving investigators and pilots the closest possible view of how the aircraft behaved in those final seconds.
Equally important was the use of pilot testimony.
Equally important was the use of pilot testimony. In the Eastwind 517 incident, the crew’s firsthand description of the sudden rudder deflection and their control responses gave investigators a living data set, bridging the gap between abstract engineering analysis and real-world cockpit experience. This emphasis on survivor testimony has since become an established part of major investigations.
Together, these lessons reshaped the culture of accident investigation. Flight 427 showed that patience, persistence, and a willingness to revisit “unsolvable” cases could yield answers, and those answers could (and did) change global aviation safety.
USAir Flight 427: Its Legacy and A Closing Reflection
The memorial at the crash site of USAir Flight 427
Today, the Boeing 737 remains one of the most widely flown airliners in the world, completing thousands of flights daily. Its redesigned rudder system, born out of the investigation into Flight 427, has prevented a repeat of the tragedies that claimed United 585 and USAir 427. The modifications became a global standard, ensuring that the flaw uncovered in the 1990s would never again cost lives.
For the aviation industry, Flight 427 was more than a single accident. It was the case that forced investigators, manufacturers, and regulators to confront the reality that even a small mechanical flaw could bring down a modern jet. It brought to the surface the truth that reliability must never be assumed and that unexplained accidents must be pursued until their secrets are revealed.
For the families, the loss was personal and permanent. Their relentless advocacy ensured that the investigation did not fade into uncertainty but pressed forward until the truth was uncovered. In doing so, they helped drive reforms that continue to protect millions of travelers around the world.
What began in heartbreak became one of aviation’s most important safety milestones.
Every routine landing of a 737 today carries the silent legacy of Flight 427.
This legacy echoes the truth that progress in aviation is often written in loss, and that even the darkest chapters can lead to lasting change.
A special presentation from Pittsburgh’s KDKA-TV marking 2024’s 30th anniversary of the USAir Flight 427 disaster.
B-29 pilot Mark Novak recently accomplished what nobody else has in at least 65 years. Last month, he exceeded 1,000 hours flying the iconic B-29 Superfortress!
There are only 2 of the historic aircraft still flying, and Novak flies them both!
B-29 Pilot Does What Nobody Else Has in at Least 65 Years 55
Both planes, FiFi and DOC, are based in the middle of the country. FiFi is in Dallas with the Commemorative Air Force (CAF), and DOC in Wichita. Both organizations wished him sincere congratulations on the milestone across their social media pages.
As of the end of August, Novak had 331 hours flying FiFi, and 669 hours flying DOC. Both bombers tour the country each year supporting various events, attending select air shows, meeting veterans and selling rides to the public.
Novak is an Air Force veteran and Flew the B-1, among other types
B-1B onn a Bombing Run. Photo: USAF
Novak graduated from the Air Force Academy in 1984. According to the CAF, he trained in T-37s and T-38s at Vance AFB and began operational service in Learjets at Offutt AFB as CINCSAC’s instructor pilot.
He later flew supersonic B-1 Bombers at Dyess AFB as a Formal Training Unit instructor, and eventually returned to the AF Academy as an officer and instructor pilot. He retired as a KC-135R evaluator pilot with the Nebraska Air National Guard, after nearly 28 years of service.
Novak has exceeded 1000 flight hours in numerous aircraft
The B-29 is actually the 5th aircraft type that Novak has flown over 1,000 hours. He has logged over 1,900 hours in the KC-135, 1,500 in the C-21, 1,400 in the B-1, and 1,200 in the T-6. He also owns and flies a T-6, a BT-13, and a Cessna 120.
DOC and FiFi together. Photo: Mike Killian
“Within the CAF, Novak has held multiple leadership roles,” said the CAF in a Facebook post. “He led the West Texas Wing, spent 11.5 years on the General Staff, and served 1.5 years as Chief of Staff. He also directed operations for 2 years and now sits on the CAF Foundation Board of Directors. A command-rated CAF pilot, he has flown the L-5, BT-13, T-6, A-26, B-24, and B-29, and was previously a member of the Standardization and Evaluation Committee.”
Let’s wish Mark a heartfelt thank you, and congratulations on his B-29 milestone. Here’s to the next 1,000!
Click here to see if FiFi will be visiting your neck of the woods soon, and click here for DOC.
Spirit Airlines will exit 11 US cities effective 2 October 2025, as part of its ongoing Chapter 11 restructuring.
The decision comes right on the heels of its second bankruptcy filing of 2025, initiated just last week. It also sheds light on the severity of the carrier’s financial challenges.
The cities losing Spirit service are:
Albuquerque, NM | Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ)
Birmingham, AL | Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport (BHM)
Columbia, SC | Columbia Metropolitan Airport (CAE)
Oakland, CA | Oakland International Airport (OAK)
Sacramento, CA | Sacramento International Airport (SMF)
San Jose, CA | Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC)
San Diego, CA | San Diego International Airport (SAN)
Portland, OR |Portland International Airport (PDX)
Salt Lake City, UT | Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC)
Contour Airlines and Spirit Airlines announce a strategic partnership to bring ULCC service to EAS communities across the US | IMAGE: Contour Airlines via Facebook/Spirit Airlines via Facebook
In addition, Spirit Airlines has canceled plans to launch service to Middle Georgia Regional Airport (MCN) in Macon, Georgia, which was scheduled to begin on 16 October in partnership with Contour Airlines.
It was only this past June when Spirit entered the Chattanooga and Columbia markets to much fanfare.
These markets make up just 3.9% of Spirit’s October seat capacity, but losing eight western US cities is a bold move for a carrier already on shaky ground (sounds like Avelo’s western retreat 2.0?)
Why Spirit Airlines Is Pulling Back
Image: By Acroterion from Wikimedia Commons
This marks Spirit’s second Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in less than a year. Although the carrier had previously emerged from an earlier restructuring with reduced debt, it continues to face significant headwinds. These include more than $2 billion in liabilities, intensifying domestic competition, higher labor and fuel costs, and a leisure demand environment that has not fully recovered since the pandemic.
Chief Executive Officer Dave Davis framed the Chapter 11 filing as a strategic necessity.
“It has become clear that there is much more work to be done, and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future,” said Davis following the most recent bankruptcy announcement. “A court-supervised process is the best path forward to make the changes needed to ensure our long-term success.”
The filing also outlined plans for Spirit to focus on core markets.
Those core markets include large bases such as Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, Detroit, Las Vegas, and Atlantic City, as well as Spirit’s Latin America and Caribbean routes.
Spirit’s troubles go deeper than routes, though. The failed JetBlue merger in early 2024 left them with $3.1 billion in debt. In its latest quarter, operating costs ran at 118% of revenue.
They’re trying to spice things up with a “premium” low-cost model, offering “Go Comfy” seats and bundled fares, but it’s a tough sell when your stock’s down 94% since January 2025, and you’re facing NYSE delisting. Plus, they’re furloughing 270 pilots come 1 November and downgrading 140 captains to first officers.
That’s a lean operation, even for a ULCC.
Then there’s the operational mess: Pratt & Whitney engine issues have sidelined chunks of Spirit’s A320neo fleet. To top it off, AerCap, their aircraft lessor, yanked leases for 36 planes due in 2027-2028 and flagged defaults on 37 current jets—about 25% of Spirit’s 214-aircraft fleet.
According to planespotters.net, Spirit currently operates a fleet of 152 Airbus aircraft.
Competitive Fallout
A Spirit Airlines Airbus A321neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Competitors are pouncing.
United is launching 15 new routes in January, targeting Spirit’s bread-and-butter like FLL, MCO, and LAS. Their SVP of network planning, Patrick Quayle, didn’t hold back, saying they’re simply prepping for if Spirit potentially “goes out of business.” Oof.
Duncan Dee, Spirit’s SVP of corporate communications, shot back at United, saying, “While we appreciate the obsession certain airline executives have with us, we’re focused on competing and running a great operation.”
While we appreciate the obsession certain airline executives have with us, we’re focused on competing and running a great operation.”
Duncan Dee | Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications, Spirit Airlines
He called United’s jab “wishful thinking” and doubled down on their low-fare mission, saying United’s goal was to “charge American travelers the highest fares possible to visit the people and places they love.”
It’s like an aviation soap opera, and we’re here for it.
United will launch 15 new routes in January, including new service from Newark to Chattanooga and Columbia, expanded Houston service to six US cities, and additional flights from Chicago (ORD), Newark (EWR), and Los Angeles (LAX) into Spirit strongholds such as Orlando (MCO), Fort Lauderdale (FLL), and Las Vegas (LAS).
Frontier isn’t sitting idle, either. It’s rolling out 42 new routes (20 were announced on 26 August, and 22 additional were announced on 4 September), many of which overlap with Spirit’s turf.
What It Means for Travelers
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
The immediate impact for passengers is reduced access to low-fare options in the affected cities. Spirit Airlines has long been a price leader, especially in leisure markets, exerting downward pressure on fares across the board. With Spirit’s departure, there is potential for higher ticket prices, particularly in smaller and mid-sized markets like Chattanooga, Columbia, and Boise, where ULCC competition is already limited.
Under US Department of Transportation rules, travelers booked on Spirit flights after 2 October will be eligible for refunds. The airline has committed to notifying customers directly and assisting with rebooking or reimbursement.
A ULCC Model Under Pressure
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit’s retrenchment highlights the challenges ULCCs face in today’s US market. The traditional model, which was built on high aircraft utilization, dense seating, and a la carte pricing, has come under strain from rising operating costs and shifting passenger expectations. Travelers increasingly demand reliability, schedule flexibility, and more comfort, putting pressure on carriers that rely on the bare-bones approach.
Moreover, consolidation across the industry has made it harder for small- to mid-sized ULCCs to compete against larger network carriers with greater financial resilience. Spirit’s failed merger attempts with Frontier and JetBlue are a giant stain on the strategic uncertainty plaguing the Dania Beach, Florida-based airline.
Spirit Airlines Has “Every Expectation” That it Will Be in Operation for “Many Years to Come”
A Spirit Airlines A320-271N at Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines via Facebook
Spirit insists it remains committed to operating as a stand-alone ULCC.
Duncan Dee says Spirit has no intention of going anywhere.
“Spirit is responsible for making low fares available to consumers for more than 30 years,” he said. “We have every expectation to continue doing so for many years to come.”
Still, its future remains highly uncertain. Industry analysts note that Spirit has not achieved a full-year profit since 2019, and with competitive pressures mounting, the road to recovery will be steep. Some suggest that another merger attempt may be inevitable, while others believe Spirit may need further cuts to achieve stability.
The decision to withdraw from 11 cities—including major West Coast markets such as San Diego, San Jose, and Portland, alongside smaller stations like Chattanooga and Columbia—marks a turning point for Spirit Airlines. Once known for rapid expansion and aggressive fare competition, the airline is now in survival mode, shrinking to preserve resources and protect its strongest hubs.
Whether this leaner network can restore profitability remains to be seen. What is certain is that Spirit’s retrenchment will reshape the ULCC landscape, reducing competition and leaving travelers with fewer low-cost options. And that’s not good for anybody.”
WestJet’s record Boeing order cements its loyalty to the US planemaker and positions the Canadian carrier for long-term growth and global expansion.
WestJet has doubled down on its Boeing-first strategy with a record-setting fleet order that cements its loyalty to the US planemaker and positions the Canadian carrier for long-term growth.
On Wednesday, 3 September, WestJet and Boeing announced the carrier’s largest-ever aircraft purchase: 60 Boeing 737-10 aircraft with options for 25 more, plus seven 787-9 Dreamliners and four additional options.
The deliveries will roll out through 2034, underlining the airline’s multibillion-dollar expansion plan.
Loyalty Forged Since 1996
A WestJet Boeing 737-200 at Calgary International Airport (YYC) in 1998 | IMAGE: By Paul Davey – https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=16966499
Since its first flights in February 1996, when it operated just three Boeing 737-200s, WestJet has built its brand and fleet exclusively around Boeing aircraft.
That consistency continues today as the airline grows into a pan-Canadian powerhouse. The order also ensures that WestJet will remain the only Canadian mainline airline operating an all-Boeing fleet well into the next decade.
Stephanie Pope, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, called the deal an endorsement of Boeing’s role in WestJet’s success.
“We are honored that WestJet has once again placed its trust in Boeing with a major investment that builds on our three decades of partnership and solidifies their fleet for the decades ahead,” Pope said. “We look forward to supporting WestJet’s exciting growth as they leverage the 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner to serve even more guests with great efficiency and comfort.”
Record-Setting Commitment
WestJet Boeing 737 MAX 8 in flight | IMAGE: WestJet
This deal marks the largest aircraft order ever placed by a Canadian carrier, and the scale is substantial. WestJet now has 123 aircraft and 40 options on its order book. The new purchases lift its backlog of the yet-to-be-certified 737-10 to 107 units, with certification currently expected in 2026. On the long-haul side, the airline will double its 787-9 Dreamliner fleet from seven to 14 aircraft.
With the addition of these aircraft, WestJet has the largest order book of any airline in Canada and will double our fleet of Dreamliners.
Alexis von Hoensbroech | WestJet CEO
CEO Alexis von Hoensbroech underscored the dual importance of growth and affordability.
“With the addition of these aircraft, WestJet has the largest order book of any airline in Canada and will double our fleet of Dreamliners, underpinning our growth plans and our commitment to affordable travel options for Canadians from coast to coast and exciting career paths for our people,” von Hoensbroech said. “These highly efficient and comfortable aircraft are critical to the growth and renewal of our fleet and will also significantly improve our fuel consumption.”
Political and Regional Support
A WestJet Boeing 737 MAX 8 at Calgary International Airport (YYC) | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order drew immediate praise from government leaders. Canada’s Minister of Transport and Internal Trade, Chrystia Freeland, framed the agreement as a “pragmatic approach to doing business, creating new opportunities, economic benefits, and long-term jobs on both sides of the border.”
Meanwhile, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith called the deal proof of Alberta’s growing aviation profile.
“I’m thrilled to see this historic purchase agreement between WestJet and Boeing. Not only does this represent WestJet’s largest-ever aircraft order, but it also reinforces Alberta’s growing reputation, both nationally and internationally, as a leading aerospace and aviation hub.”
Alberta is not only the home of WestJet, which is based at Calgary International Airport (YYC), but also the focus city of Edmonton (YEG).
WestJet’s Fleet in Context
Lineup of WestJet aircraft. WestJet’s record Boeing order will double the size of the Calgary-based carrier’s Dreamliner fleet | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet currently operates 157 Boeing aircraft:
36 Boeing 737-700s
58 Boeing 737-800s
56 Boeing 737 MAX 8s
7 Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners
A WestJet Encore De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 | IMAGE: WestJet
Its regional affiliate, WestJet Encore, adds 35 De Havilland Canada Dash 8-400 turboprops, while WestJet Cargo further broadens the group’s scope. With WestJet’s record Boeing order, WestJet will hold the largest order book of any Canadian carrier.
Aircraft Type
In Service
On Order (Firm)
On Order (Options)
Boeing 737-700
36
0
0
Boeing 737-800
58
0
0
Boeing 737 MAX 8
56
0
0
Boeing 737-10 MAX (On Order)
0
107
25
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
7
0
0
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner (New Orders)
0
7
4
De Havilland Canada Dash 8-400 (WestJet Encore)
35
0
0
Total
192
114
29
WestJet is Positioning Itself as a Major Player in North American Aviation
A WestJet Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner in flight. WestJet’s record Boeing order will double the size of the Calgary-based carrier’s Dreamliner fleet | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order comes as the carrier consolidates its position as Canada’s second-largest airline and the eighth largest in North America by frequency.
Last year, it carried more than 25 million passengers across a network of over 100 destinations spanning North America, the Caribbean, Europe, Asia, and Central America. Calgary International Airport (YYC) remains its primary hub, with Toronto Pearson (YYZ) as a secondary hub and a strong presence in Vancouver (YVR), Edmonton (YEG), Halifax (YHZ), Montreal (YUL), St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador (YYT), and Winnipeg (YWG).
WestJet has also reshaped its portfolio through acquisitions and brand integration. In 2022, it acquired Sunwing, and in 2023, it folded its ultra-low-cost carrier Swoop into mainline operations to streamline its offerings. These moves, combined with the new Boeing commitments, point to a strategy aimed at balancing affordable domestic service with competitive long-haul expansion.
What’s Good News for WestJet is Great News for Boeing
WestJet Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order is more than just numbers on a balance sheet. It’s a clear signal that the airline is doubling down on the Boeing 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner as the backbone of its fleet for years to come.
For Boeing, the deal couldn’t come at a better time. It will add momentum as the OEM juggernaut pushes to steady production and stay ahead of Airbus in the global market.
For WestJet, the move marks a turning point. It guarantees the airline will stay a Boeing customer well into the next decade while giving it the muscle to expand both at home and overseas. What started in 1996 as a scrappy Western Canadian upstart is now one of North America’s most prominent players.
With Canada’s largest aircraft order book and a renewed tie to Boeing, WestJet is setting up its next chapter: keeping fares affordable for Canadian travelers while reaching deeper into international skies — with its future written firmly in Renton and Everett steel.
In 1907, British aerospace inventor Horatio Frederick Phillips designed and tested a plane with 200 individual wings. Coming four years after the Wright Brothers’ historic first flight, Phillips’ plane made what was probably the first manned, powered flight in the United Kingdom. Horatio Phillips also studied aeronautics and earned several patents for cambered, or curved, wing surfaces.
View from the back of the Horatio Phillips multiplane with 200 airfoils in a venetian blind configuration. | Image: Public Domain
Phillips’ 1907 Multiplane had 200 Wings
It would be difficult to imagine a more striking, unique aircraft than Phillips’ 1907 design called the “multiplane.” The wings, resembling venetian blinds, had four sets of 50 airfoils. They were connected in a cage structure.
The aircraft was made of wood and had a 22-horsepower engine that could move it to a take-off speed of about 30 miles per hour. It also had an eight-foot diameter propeller and weighed about 500 pounds without a pilot.
Multiplane Makes First Manned Flight in United Kingdom
Phillips’ first flight with the multiplane took place on 6 April 1907, and he flew about 500 feet. Some disputed that it was a true manned flight, as the pilot had no way of controlling it. One unique feature of the multiplane was that its wings were cambered, or curved, something that he had already become well known for.
Horatio Phillips’ 1904 aircraft had 50 wings. | Image: aerospaceweb.org
In 1904, Phillips had designed and tested another plane with a venetian blind design. This one had a relatively few 20 wings. He also built its 22-horsepower water-cooled 4-cylinder engine himself. This plane had a tail section in the shape of a cross and a three-wheel undercarriage.
Horatio Phillips’ first attempt with a multi-wing plane came in 1893. He designed it with 50 wings in a similar venetian blind arrangement as the other models. The blinds, or wings, were about 20 feet long and set about two inches apart. The propeller was turned by a coal-fired engine, producing about nine miles per hour.
Phillips tested his 1893 aircraft, powered by a coal-fired engine, on a circular wooden track. | Image: aerospaceweb.org
Phillips tested this aircraft on a circular track, which was 100 feet in diameter and made of wooden planks four feet wide. The aircraft had no pilot, so Phillips attached it to a central post with wires. Once it reached 40 miles per hour, it lifted to just two or three feet.
These aircraft were not Phillips’ only experience with aeronautics. Before designing the aircraft, he studied airfoils and how they could produce lift.
Cayley Studies Airfoil Concepts in the 1850s
In the 1850s, English engineer George Cayley was the first to study the concept of heavier-than-air flight. During his research, he discovered that curved surfaces produced more lift than flat ones. He also saw the effectiveness of streamlining and balance for an aircraft.
In 1852, he designed, built, and tested the world’s first fixed-wing glider that could carry a person. This earned Cayley the title of “Father of Aerodynamics.”
Philips received a patent for these airfoil concepts, which he based on the shapes of bird wings. | Image: aeronautical-journal_1908
He even built his own wind tunnel to test his ideas. It had a steam injector that pulled air into its entrance, creating an air flow that he used to test his concepts.
Phillips Receives Patent For His Ideas
Phillips’ airfoils were curved more on the top than on the bottom, which gave them the name “double-surface airfoils.” In 1894, he received a patent for eight of his designs. Phillips later used his airfoils on his venetian blind-style planes, and aircraft designers worldwide began using Phillips’ ideas on more modern aircraft.
In March of 1990, my KC-10 crew was tasked to support a naval exercise over the Mediterranean Sea.
The USS Eisenhower was in the eastern Med and about to be relieved by the USS Forrestal, entering the Med from the west. Whenever the Navy had two aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea, they would simulate a war game against each other. Our KC-10 was temporarily based out of Naval Air Station (NAS) Sigonella, at the sole of the boot, near Catania, Italy.
NAS Sigonella, Italy | IMAGE: By Civa61 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50526269
I was a new copilot, flying one of my first overseas trips with my assigned aircraft commander, Jeff McAllister, flight engineer Reagan Moon, and boom operator, Russ. We’d provide refueling support to all takers, not favoring one ship over the other.
After our first day of the exercise refueling Navy F-14 Tomcats, F-18 Hornets, and EA-6B electronic jamming Prowlers, we received permission for an aircraft carrier fly-by. Everyone remembers the Top Gun scene where Tom Cruise zoomed past the carrier in his super-fast F-14, spilling the coffee of the officer on deck. Ours was nothing like that, let’s just say.
We dialed up the Eisenhower’s TACAN radio navigation beam to guide us to the ship and set up for the approach as if it were a runway. Once at 200 feet above the water, Jeff offset from the ship’s centerline and flew along the port, or left side, of the ship. We then executed a low approach, retracting our landing gear and flaps, and flew back around the carrier for a “high-speed” pass at 250 knots (290 mph). Our little airshow completed, we headed back to Sigonella for the day.
Grounded KC-10, Lucky Break: Hitching a Ride on a C-2 Greyhound
A U.S. Air Force KC-10 Extender at Naval Air Station Sigonella in 2021 | IMAGE: US Marine Corps photo by Sgt. William Chockey
Although our fairly new KC-10 was pretty reliable, this particular aircraft had a maintenance issue on Day 2 of the exercise. A vital piece of equipment for our electrical system, called the transformer rectifier, stopped working, and the plane was grounded until that part could be replaced.
Our KC-10 was parked on the Navy ramp near several C-2 Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, which were twin-turboprop small airplanes used to ferry men and equipment out to the aircraft carriers. I jokingly asked my AC, Jeff, if we could get a ride on the C-2. We figured it didn’t hurt to ask. Walking into the small squadron building, we found a Navy O-3 lieutenant behind the scheduling desk. I strolled up and said, “Hi. We are with the KC-10 sitting out there, but it’s broken today. What’s it take to get a flight on a C-2?”
He looked down at his pad of paper and, without any hesitation, said, “I have one leaving at 1500 (3:00 p.m.) for the Eisenhower. Wanna go? I can add you all to the flight manifest.”
“Sure!” we answered with a smile. Jeff and I headed back outside to tell our flight engineer, Reagan, and boom operator, Russ, that we had arranged for us all to fly out to the USS Eisenhower.
The C-2 crew gave us our protective headgear and inflatable life vests and showed us to the aft-facing seats in the cargo hold of the small plane. The four of us couldn’t believe our luck as we took off and headed for the same aircraft carrier we had just flown by the day before.
Life Aboard the USS Eisenhower
Official US Navy photo taken during the ship’s 10th Med Cruise (1998) | IMAGE: By US Navy – Public Domain
The C-2 had very few windows, and they were tiny at that, so knowing where we were in relation to the carrier was difficult. The plane entered the arrival pattern for landing aircraft and made a series of hard 90-degree turns, throwing us from side to side, until we finally lined up on final approach. The trap landing was very sudden, and the quick deceleration after catching the cable felt like the end of a roller coaster ride when the coaster car comes screeching back into the station. It was all very abrupt.
We deplaned and looked around the massive carrier as men in their khaki naval uniforms looked down at us from the Crow’s Nest high above the flight deck. One of the men was a Chief Petty Officer who volunteered to take us on an impromptu tour of his big ship.
We strolled through the narrow hallways, crouching low to avoid banging our heads on various gray doors, up and down numerous staircases, and into the flight rooms of the Naval flying squadrons assigned to the ship for that sea tour. I gave my day-old copy of the Stars and Stripes military newspaper to a Naval aviator, and he sarcastically remarked, “Oh yeah. Y’all get to ‘Go Navy’ for all of one day!”
090719-N-6854D-001
ATLANTIC OCEAN (July 19, 2009) A French Dassault Rafale fighter aircraft conducts touch and go landings aboard the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) during a coalition training exercise. The Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group is operating in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility after a scheduled five month deployment in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility supporting Operation Enduring Freedom and maritime security operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jon Dasbach/Released)
Our single day was much easier to enjoy than his six months at sea.
Eventually our tour ended up in the Flight Operations Center, where we got to meet the Air Boss, a Navy O-6 captain in charge of the launch and recovery of the ship’s air fleet. He asked, “Were y’all the crew that flew by yesterday?”
“Yes, sir. That was us,” Jeff answered with a grin. “What did you think of it?”
He smiled back and remarked, “Well, that high-speed pass was nothing, since we have Tomcats. But the low-speed approach and go around was very impressive! Your tail engine was shooting up a rooster tail in the water. Now that was cool.”
Unknown to us, our KC-10 (DC-10-30) tail engine had created a giant spray in the ocean behind us.
The Air Boss then asked, “How long will y’all be onboard?”
Jeff replied, “We have to get back to Sigonella today to coordinate the repair of our KC-10.”
Due to the time zone difference, the maintenance personnel back at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, were not even aware at this point that our jet was broken.
The Air Boss then remarked, “That’s too bad. If you stayed the night, I’d probably be able to get you a Tomcat (F-14) ride in the morning.”
We couldn’t believe that opportunity, but really had to get back to shore since our C-2 plane was preparing to depart. As we crossed the carrier’s flight deck, I told Jeff, “It would almost be worth the Article 15 (military punishment) to stay the night and get that flight!”
Cat Shots, Delays, and Italian Adventures
050518-N-0226M-177 Pacific Ocean (May 18, 2005) – Topside Safety Petty Officer, Aviation BoatswainÕs Mate Jeffery Fournier, clears the launch area as he signals to the Catapult Officer that a C-2A Greyhound, assigned to the “Providers” of Fleet Logistics Squadron Three Zero (VRC 30), is ready for to be launched from the flight deck of USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76). Reagan is currently underway in the Pacific Ocean conducting carrier qualifications for West Coast Fleet Replacement Squadrons. | IMAGE: U.S. Navy photo by Senior Chief Photographer’s Mate Mahlon K. Miller (RELEASED)
We strapped into the back of the COD, and the enlisted crewmember briefed us on what to expect during the catapult launch, or “Cat Shot.” Because we were facing backwards, we needed to cross our arms across our chest and cross our feet at the ankles, then brace for the departure. Otherwise, the instant G-forces of the launch would make our arms and legs fly out uncontrollably in front of us.
We did as told and heard the two turboprop engines rev up to takeoff rpm. In a flash, the plane lurched forward, and we could feel the blood rushing to our cheeks and eyes as we strained to keep our arms and legs close to our bodies. Within seconds, the rapid acceleration ended, and we were airborne in what felt like a calm, floating sensation after that violent takeoff. I looked at my friends’ faces, and we were all bright red from the rush of blood created by the G-forces. Within an hour, we were back on terra firma, and Jeff placed a call back to Barksdale to explain our maintenance issue.
The good news for our crew was that the replacement part would be sent to us on a C-141 cargo plane leaving the States and flying a routine resupply mission throughout the Mediterranean region. This meant our broken KC-10 would remain on the ground for another four days. Enough time to tour southern Italy and go on another C-2 flight!
The four of us toured Palermo and walked on Roman ruins, then enjoyed authentic Italian pasta and pizza with glasses of red wine each evening. Quite a cultural and worldly experience for guys in their late twenties. Days later, we headed back to the C-2 squadron and scheduled another flight, but this time to the older USS Forrestal. The landing and tour were very much like the first event on the Ike, but I wanted to experiment on the next catapult takeoff. I purposely relaxed my arms and legs, resting my hands on my knees.
As the C-2 shot forward with me facing the back of the plane, my arms and legs involuntarily flew out in front of me, parallel to the floor. With all my strength, I could not bring them back close to my body until the rapid acceleration subsided. We all looked at each other again, red-faced and laughing like kids at a carnival.
Go Navy! (For Two Days): When My KC-10 Crew Catapulted Off the USS Eisenhower 80
New Release Alert! This October, bestselling author David Dale invites you to take flight on an inspiring journey of personal growth, resilience, and adventure—perfect for aspiring pilots, military history buffs, and anyone seeking a story of perseverance and triumph! Aviation Therapy is a deeply personal aviation memoir—an intersection of extraordinary world events and one man’s transformation through flight. Packed with gripping firsthand accounts and invaluable life lessons, Aviation Therapy is “Chicken Soup for the Skies”—a testament to how aviation can shape character, build confidence, and inspire a sense of purpose.
Pre-order now on Amazon and be among the first to experience Aviation Therapy—available 21 October 2025.
When an arresting cable snapped aboard the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower in 2016, a Hawkeye dropped toward the Atlantic before climbing out in dramatic fashion.
Back in 2016, you may remember the PLAT (Pilot’s Landing Aid Television) video that seemed to be everywhere. Unless you were living under a rock without WiFi, it was hard to miss. The footage showed an E-2C NP Hawkeye barely making it off the deck after an arresting cable parted aboard the carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) back on Friday, 18 March 2016.
In the now infamous clip, the Hawkeye rolled off the angle looking like it did not have nearly enough airspeed to stay airborne. For a split second, it appeared the Hummer was destined for the drink. Instead, the pilot coaxed every ounce of performance out of the aircraft and kept it flying. Credit where it is due. That was some serious airmanship.
Here is the video of the mishap, a carefully chosen word in this case, uploaded to YouTube by The Virginian-Pilot. But as dramatic as the footage is, there was far more going on behind the scenes. Stick around for more…
At the time, the Ike was conducting workups prior to their 2016 Mediterranean Deployment off the Virginia coast. Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron ONE TWO THREE (VAW-123) Screwtops was one of the squadrons making up Carrier Air Wing THREE (CVW-3). CVW-3 was preparing for their first deployment aboard Ike in quite a while. The carrier had completed an extensive overhaul and returned to sea in September 2015.
VAW-123 Hummer. Image via US Navy
At 1352, a VAW-123 Hawkeye, side number 602, piloted by Lieutenant Matthew “Noodle” Halliwell with Lieutenant Commander Kellen Smith in the right seat and NFO Lieutenant Commander Thomas Browning also aboard, entered the break and prepared to trap aboard the Ike. “Noodle” called the ball and got lined up.
The approach wasn’t exactly textbook, with the Hummer settling a bit in close, but the aircraft’s tailhook still caught the number 4 cross-deck pendant. During the runout of the arresting cable, something that hadn’t happened aboard a US Navy aircraft carrier since 2005 did — the arresting cable parted. As snapped arresting cables are wont to do, the 1.5-inch wide cable whipped around the deck, injuring several crew members working on the roof.
Deck crew trying to avoid parted cable on the Ike. Image via YouTube video capture
By all appearances, the Hawkeye was done for. Those who have seen similar footage of or witnessed aircraft dribbling off the forward end of the angle after a hook failure or partial arrestment surely expected a large splash to mark the watery demise of the Hummer. During a deep settle to an estimated altitude of 10 to 15 feet above the waves, the aircraft dropped completely out of sight for almost four seconds.
Inside the Hummer, training kicked in; they sucked up the gear and blew the ditching hatches; everything in the cockpit was firewalled, and the controls were fervently set for climb.
Miraculously, the aircraft responded and climbed back into the frame in one dry piece. LT Halliwell didn’t take a chance on a recovering aboard with a potentially damaged hook, though. He recovered instead at Naval Station Norfolk Chambers Field, the East Coast home of the VAW community.
VAW-123 Hummer. Image via US Navy
Back on the deck of the Eisenhower, the carnage was incredible. Injuries suffered by two of the deck crew and six VAW-123 maintainers ranged from cuts and bruises to broken arms, legs, ankles, and dislocated hips, and more, some of which took more than a year to heal.
At least one man’s life was saved by his “cranial”, the helmet every deck crewman wears while working on the roof. Six men were evacuated and treated ashore. A VRC-40 Rawhides C-2A (R) Greyhound and an HSC-7 Dusty Dogs MH-60R Knighthawk were damaged by the cable.
Navy deck crew wearing their cranials (helmets). Image via US Navy
Two days later, the Ike was back conducting flight ops. The three men aboard the Hawkeye received the Armed Forces Air Medal. An investigation revealed that the arresting gear for the number 4 cross-deck pendant had been improperly serviced earlier in the day.
The mishap aboard the Eisenhower was the first of its kind since 2005, when the #3 arresting cable on the carrier USS Kitty Hawk (CVA-63) snapped, causing the loss of a VFA-102 Diamondbacks F/A-18F Super Hornet and injuries to six of the Hawk’s deck crew. The crew of the F/A-18F was recovered.
VAW-123 Hummer. Image via US Navy
From 1 June 2016 to 30 December 2016 CVW-3 aboard the Eisenhower during the carrier’s 2016 Med Cruise consisted of VFA-32 Fighting Swordsmen flying the Boeing F/A-18F Super Hornet, VFA-86 Sidewinders and VFA-105 Gunslingers flying the Boeing F/A-18E Super Hornet, VFA-131 Wildcats flying the old-school McDonnell Douglas (Boeing) F/A-18C(N) Hornet, VAQ-130 Zappers flying the Boeing EA-18G Growler, VAW-123 Screwtops flying the Grumman E-2C NP Hawkeye, HSC-7 Dusty Dogs flying the Sikorsky MH-60S Knighthawk, HSM-74 Swamp Foxes flying the Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk, and a Detachment from VRC-40 Rawhides flying the Grumman C-2A(R) Greyhound.
Here’s the news story with pilot interviews also uploaded to YouTube by The Virginian-Pilot.
On 27 August 2025, Gulfstream made it official: the very first G800 has been delivered.
The lucky owner remains anonymous (for now), but what we do know is that this new flagship is something incredibly special.
After clearing both FAA and EASA certification back in April 2025, the G800 is now out in the world: fully mature, flight-ready, and ready to take private aviation even further. Literally.
So what’s all the buzz about? If you’ve been tracking Gulfstream’s evolution from the G650 to the G700 and now to the G800, you’ll know this jet had big shoes to fill. And it does. It’s got style, speed, and a cabin that feels more like a luxury apartment than a pressurized tube.
Here are the seven standout features that make the G800 Gulfstream’s most epic aircraft yet.
1. It Flies Farther Than Anything Else Out There
Map showing the range of the G800 from Dallas. Only the shaded area is outside of the G800’s range (if Dallas is the starting point) | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
Let’s start with what everyone’s talking about: range. The G800 now claims the title of the longest-range business jet in the world (at least until the elusive BBJ 777X debuts).
Cruise Speed
Range (nautical miles)
Mach 0.85
8,200 nm
Mach 0.87
8,000 nm
Mach 0.90
7,000 nm
City Pair
Distance (approx.)
Sydney ➝ Dallas
8,200 nm
Los Angeles ➝ Dubai
8,000 nm
London ➝ Perth
7,500 nm
That’s enough to get you from Sydney to Dallas or Los Angeles to Dubai without stopping. I don’t know about you, but the G800’s range is truly something to behold. It’s a game-changer for anyone who flies globally and values efficiency. No layovers, no fuel stops. Just point A to point B at high speed, high altitude, and high comfort.
In a word: wow.
2. An Interior Worthy of an Art Gallery
G800 Interior with crew compartment in foreground | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
While the G800 certainly boasts some mind-blowing numbers, its allure goes far beyond. To give you an idea of just how masterfully designed it is, the G800 was the winner of the 2025 International Yacht & Aviation Award, a coveted award presented by leading interior design magazine design et al and leading yacht and aviation design magazine Luxe et al.
You’ll find handcrafted details throughout — from the onyx leather seating with diamond stitching to cabinetry finished in Dark Wenge wood. There’s woven mélange on the sidewalls, polished white stone flooring, and a warm, earthy color palette that feels equal parts luxury lounge and executive suite.
Diagram showing 3 living areas and a crew compartment on the G800 | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
You can choose up to four living areas or go with three plus a dedicated crew rest compartment. There’s seating for up to 19 and sleeping arrangements for 10. Aft, there’s a spacious lav with a vanity and wardrobe.
Up front, the galley comes in Gulfstream’s largest configuration with generous storage and counter space.
It is obvious that Gulfstream has painstakingly designed every inch of this aircraft to support globe-spanning missions in total comfort.
G800 Cabin Interior | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
A tour of the G800’s interior
3. A Whisper-Quiet, Wellness-Centric Cabin
You know Gulfstream takes passenger comfort seriously, but the G800 takes it to a new level. The cabin altitude (how pressurized the interior of the aircraft is relative to sea level conditions) is just 2,840 feet — even when you’re cruising at 41,000 — and it’s filled with 100% fresh air that’s completely replaced every two to three minutes.
The cabin altitude is just 2,840 feet — even when you’re cruising at 41,000 — and it’s filled with 100% fresh air that’s completely replaced every two to three minutes | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
The G800 incorporates sixteen Gulfstream Panoramic Oval Windows | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
There’s also a plasma ionization purification system onboard, which helps neutralize viruses, bacteria, and allergens. Combine that with whisper-quiet noise levels and circadian rhythm lighting, and you’ve got an environment that’s genuinely restorative, even on 15-hour legs. Yes, please.
And those windows. Sixteen of Gulfstream’s coveted Panoramic Oval Windows—the biggest you’ll find on any business jet—flood the cabin with natural light. Beyond the amazing views, the brightness helps create a wellness-focused environment, keeping passengers more alert and less fatigued on long flights.
4. The Flight Deck Is a Pilot’s Dream
G800 flight deck | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
For those who care about what’s happening up front (and we know you do), the G800’s Symmetry Flight Deck is something to behold.
The G800 is equipped with active control sidesticks, a fly-by-wire system that provides real-time tactile feedback by synchronizing pilot inputs through electronically linked controls. This enhances crew coordination and situational awareness by allowing each pilot to sense the other’s control actions. It’s a significant advancement in human-machine interface. Originally introduced by Gulfstream, this system remains unique within the business aviation sector and is also found on the G500, G600, and G700.
The flight deck also includes ten touchscreen displays integrated with Gulfstream’s Phase-of-Flight intelligence, which organizes information based on the current stage of flight. This helps reduce pilot workload, improves operational flow, and shortens aircraft startup time.
Gulfstream’s Combined Vision System (CVS) merges the Synthetic Vision System (SVS) and Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) into a single image on the head-up display | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
Gulfstream’s Combined Vision System (CVS) merges the Synthetic Vision System (SVS) and Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) into a single image on the head-up display. This unified view is not only really cool but genuinely useful, enhancing situational awareness, especially when operating in unfamiliar environments or low-visibility conditions.
If you’re already type-rated on a G700 or G650, you’ll feel right at home. The high degree of cockpit commonality across Gulfstream’s large-cabin fleet means less time transitioning between aircraft and more time in the air.
Gulfstream’s Flight Deck for the 21st Century
5. It’s Fast, Efficient, and Surprisingly Nimble
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
As if its capabilities weren’t already clear, the G800 combines long-range performance with impressive speed and short-field operation.
Max speed: Mach 0.935
Initial cruise altitude: 41,000 feet
Max cruise altitude: 51,000 feet
Takeoff distance (MTOW): just 5,812 feet
The G800 is powered by Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
That last number is important. It means the G800 can operate from many airports typically off-limits to ultra-long-range jets. And thanks to the Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines and advanced Daher winglets, the aircraft gets 33% better fuel efficiency compared to older Gulfstream models. You’re going farther, faster, and burning less fuel to do it.
The Gulfstream G800 features advanced Daher winglets, as seen out one of the G800’s panoramic windows | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
6. Scale That Serves a Purpose
Yes, this jet is massive for its class, but in the best possible way.
Think cathedral ceilings meets private club lounge. With a cabin height of 6 ft 3 in, even the tallest passengers won’t feel like they’re ducking through the flight. At 8 ft 2 in wide and nearly 47 feet long, the space feels more like a living room that just happens to be 40,000 feet in the air. That’s 2,138 cubic feet of room to stretch, stroll, or simply enjoy the fact that you’re not wedged into a seat like on commercial flights.
The numbers on paper are equally impressive: a 6,200-pound payload, 105,600-pound max takeoff weight, and a 195-cubic-foot baggage compartment…which, let’s be honest, means you can pack for every mood. Skis? Golf clubs? Three different wardrobes, just in case? Bring them all.
The beauty here is that the jet doesn’t just look big; it knows how to use its size. It really doesn’t matter if you’re flying a full passenger load or setting up shop for a long-haul business trip; there’s space for people, for gear, and for a few creature comforts that make the journey feel less like transit and more like arrival.
Spec
Measurement
Cabin Height
6 ft 3 in
Cabin Width
8 ft 2 in
Cabin Length (excluding baggage)
46 ft 10 in
Cabin Volume
2,138 cu ft
Baggage Volume
195 cu ft
Maximum Payload
6,200 lb
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
105,600 lb
Gulfstream G800 High Altitude Testing
7. It’s the $72.5M Pinnacle of the Gulfstream Evolution
The Gulfstream business jet lineup, including the G280, G400, G500, G600, G700, and G800 | IMAGE: Gulfstream
The G800 may be Gulfstream’s newest model, but it’s also the culmination of years of the Savannah-based company’s legacy of innovation. It builds on the strengths of the G650, G650ER, and G700, combining their best qualities into a purpose-built, future-ready aircraft. It officially replaces the G650, which wrapped production in early 2025.
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
With an estimated base price of $72.5 million, the G800 is Gulfstream’s next-generation flagship. It enters service with extraordinary program maturity, having benefited from everything the company learned in developing the G700. The first unit rolled out of Gulfstream’s completion facility at Appleton International Airport (ATW) in Wisconsin, which is the same place where the company handles large-cabin outfitting and painting/finishing.
But really, the G800 reflects the work of over 21,000 people across the company, all pushing for one thing: to raise the bar again.
And they did.
G800: Paint Precision in Every Layer
A New Benchmark
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
With the G800, Gulfstream has set the benchmark for what long-range, large-cabin aviation can and should be. For pilots, it’s a cockpit that feels like the future. For operators, it’s efficiency wrapped in performance. For passengers, it’s comfort taken to a level few thought possible. And for those of us who just love airplanes, it’s one of those rare designs that makes you stop and stare.
This is the future of private aviation, and it has arrived with authority. The G800 flies farther, climbs faster, whispers quieter, and thinks smarter than anything that came before it.
And let’s be real — it’s also the coolest jet on the planet right now.
Behind the scenes video of the G800’s first flight
For the second time in a year, Spirit Airlines files for bankruptcy, pledging to cut costs and refocus on profitable markets.
Spirit Airlines has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time in less than a year, highlighting just how tough the skies have become for the ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC) model in today’s turbulent aviation market.
The Dania Beach, Fla.–based airline announced on Friday, 29 August, that it has commenced a voluntary restructuring process in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Spirit insists that flights, ticket sales, reservations, loyalty redemptions, and day-to-day operations will continue as normal during the process.
From Quick Fix to Deep Overhaul
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit previously filed for Chapter 11 in November 2024, emerging just four months later in March with a leaner balance sheet after creditors swapped debt for equity. At that time, management avoided dramatic changes such as significant fleet reductions or network shrinkage, hoping cost discipline and equity infusions would stabilize the carrier.
That bet has not paid off. Since exiting bankruptcy in March, Spirit reported losses approaching $257 million by the end of June, compared with a forecast profit of $252 million. Persistently high operating costs, weaker domestic fares, and a glut of US seat capacity dragged the ULCC back into financial distress.
Earlier this month, Spirit Airlines even issued a going-concern warning, admitting at the time that there was “substantial doubt” about the company’s ability to keep operating over the next 12 months without drastic changes or an infusion of cash.
It seems that the writing may have already been on the wall at that point.
Now, CEO Dave Davis says Spirit must go further:
It has become clear that there is much more work to be done, and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future. A court-supervised process is the best path forward to make the changes needed to ensure our long-term success.
Dave Davis, Spirit Airlines President and Chief Executive Officer
Key Elements of the Restructuring Plan
A Spirit Airlines A320-271N departs from Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines via Facebook
Spirit’s new bankruptcy strategy calls for broad, structural changes rather than quick fixes. Among its stated priorities:
Network Redesign: The carrier will double down on its focus cities, providing more frequencies and connectivity while exiting underperforming markets.
Fleet Optimization: Spirit will “rightsize” its Airbus narrowbody fleet to better match profitable demand, reducing lease obligations and targeting hundreds of millions in annual savings.
Cost Structure Adjustments: Building on its reputation as an industry cost leader, Spirit plans additional efficiencies across operations.
Product Segmentation: The airline will lean into its tiered offerings—Spirit First, Premium Economy, and its core Value fare—giving travelers more premium upsell opportunities while maintaining its ULCC ethos.
Unlike its last trip through bankruptcy, this restructuring explicitly acknowledges the need to shrink and realign both network and fleet, which are moves that aircraft lessors and creditors have reportedly been pushing for.
While Chapter 11 Is Common in US Aviation, a Second Filing in One Year Sets a New Precedent
A Spirit Airlines Airbus A320neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit is hardly alone in using Chapter 11 as a survival tool. Virtually every major US carrier has done so at some point, from United and Delta in the early 2000s to American after the 2008 financial crisis.
But, as Spirit Airlines files for bankruptcy for the second time in less than a year, it is unprecedented for a major US airline in recent history. The company faces an uphill battle: ongoing competition from Frontier Airlines, which just announced 20 new routes targeting Spirit’s markets, and lingering operational pressures, including the Pratt & Whitney GTF engine recall that grounded portions of its A320neo fleet.
Add to this the fallout of a failed merger with JetBlue—blocked in federal court in 2024—and Spirit finds itself squeezed on all sides.
What It Means for Passengers and the Industry
IMAGES: Allegiant/Avelo/Breeze/Frontier via Facebook, Spirit via Photo by David Syphers on Unsplash
For now, Spirit insists travelers will see little change. Flights are operating, loyalty perks remain intact, and employees will continue receiving pay and benefits. Yet history shows that deeper restructuring often means fewer aircraft, fewer routes, and a smaller footprint. We’ve said this before, but it is hard to imagine that this new filing won’t have a massive effect on Spirit’s operations.
For the rest of the airline industry, Spirit’s struggles raise bigger questions about the future of the ULCC model in a market increasingly dominated by the Big Four. With domestic yields under pressure and capacity growth outpacing demand, leaner carriers like Spirit may have to evolve—or risk extinction.
Here’s Hoping for a Good Outcome
Spirit’s website for its restructuring, www.spiritrestructuring.com, offers transparency to passengers and stakeholders as the process unfolds. But for most, the real story will be whether Spirit’s “reset” finally delivers a sustainable business model—or if this is the beginning of the end for America’s largest budget airline.
For now, the yellow jets still fly, but the road ahead will test just how much turbulence the ULCC model can withstand. Our hearts go out to our readers who are in any way connected to Spirit, whether they’re pilots, flight attendants, maintenance crew, or airport personnel. We at Avgeekery wish our friends at Spirit nothing but the very best.
F-4 Phantom fighter pilot ACE, Randy “Duke” Cunningham, has died at age 83. His decorated Navy career in the Vietnam war became the stuff of legend, after shooting down 5 enemy MiGs – and being shot down himself.
He would go on to become a Top Gun instructor and commander of VF-126, with a distinguished 20-year military career. His later life as a politician, however, would see him shot down again, convicted of taking bribes from defense contractors (later pardoned by President Trump).
Vietnam War gets its first Ace
Cunningham was the first fighter ACE in Vietnam, and the Navy’s top-scoring fighter pilot of the war. The young Lieutenant was flying F-4J Phantoms off the USS Constellation, assigned to VF-96 FIGHTING FALCONS, when he flew into aviation history.
It was his second tour, and it wasn’t long before he and his RIO, Lieutenant “Willy” Driscoll, began stacking up kills. The first came on January 19, 1972, when they engaged two MiG-21s and shot down one with a sidewinder.
Their next kill came 4 months later, when they engaged 3 MiGs on May 8. Two of the MiGs were chasing them, while Cunningham chased and shot down the third MiG, which was chasing their wingman.
F-4 Fighter Ace Duke Cunningham has Died 112
They wouldn’t have to wait another 4 months to earn their next kills. The next 3 would all come on the same flight, just 2 days later.
Flying as call sign “Showtime 100”, Cunningham and Driscoll racked up their next kills on a flak suppression mission south of Hanoi. They engaged in an intense aerial battle with over 20 enemy fighters, shooting down 2 MiGs and saving their Executive Officer, before heading to the coast back to the boat.
Another MiG, however, had other ideas. Cunningham and Driscoll were in for the dogfight of their lives, and it was flying at them head-on.
VF-96 F-4J Phantoms, including “Showtime 100”, executing a strike over Vietnam
One of the most epic dogfights of the jet age
What took place next is arguably one of the most epic dogfights of the jet age. As the MiG approached Cunningham pulled straight up, as bullets whizzed by his canopy. The MiG, which sucked in climb performance compared to a Phantom, followed anyway.
“I pulled hard up in the vertical, figuring that the MiG would keep right on going for home. I looked back and…there was the MiG… canopy to canopy with me! He couldn’t have been more than thirty feet away…I could see the pilot clearly…leather helmet, goggles, scarf… we were both going straight up, but I was outzooming him. He fell behind, and as I came over the top, he started shooting. I had given him a predictable flight path and lie had taken advantage of it. The tracers were missing me, but not by much! I rolled out, and he pulled in right behind me.
Showtime 100 showing off its Sidewinder and Sparrow missiles
I pulled down and I was holding top rudder, trying to knuckle at the nose. As soon as I committed my nose, he pulled right into me! I waited for his nose to commit, then I pulled up into him. We separated, turned around, and engaged again. Same thing. Up into a rolling scissors…advantage, disadvantage…advantage disadvantage… disadvantage… disadvantage… disengaged, came hack, engaged again, and went up in the vertical again. This is one of the very few MiGs that ever fought in the vertical. We kept engaging. and I never could get enough advantage on him to get a shot. Everything my airplane did, he reacted to instinctively.
The next time we started up in the vertical, an idea came to me. I went to idle and speed brakes, and he shot out in front of me! I think it really surprised him… being out in front for the first time. Anyway, we’re both going straight up and losing speed fast. I was down to 150 knots and I knew I was going to have to go to full burner to hold it. I did, and we both pitched over the top. As he came over, I used rudder to get the airplane to turn to his belly side. He lost lift coming over the top, and, I think, departed the airplane a bit. He had stayed too long. He was low on fuel, and I think he decided to run. He pitched over the top and started straight down. I went after him and, though I didn’t think the Sidewinder would guide straight down with all the heat of the ground to look at, I squeezed one off anyway.
F-4 Fighter Ace Duke Cunningham has Died 113
The missile came oil the rail and went to his airplane. There was just a little flash, and I thought, ‘God, it missed him!’ I started to fire my last Sidewinder and suddenly…a big flash of flame and black smoke erupted from his airplane. He didn’t seem to go out of control, but he flew straight down into the ground. He didn’t get out.”
Showtime 100 was shot down, shortly after scoring the Ace kill
Showtime 100 did not have long to celebrate. They were not safe yet, and were shot down by a SAM on their way back to the carrier.
The jet, however, was still operating, just crippled. Cunningham worked hard to keep it in the air, as he wanted to avoid becoming a POW. Eventually the jet gave out, going into an uncontrollable spin. Both crew ejected, and were picked up by a search and rescue helicopter.
Safely back on the carrier, Cunningham shares his story about shooting down 3 MiGs and being shot down himself to his comrades
For his efforts on that day, Cunningham received the Navy Cross.
From decorated Navy ace fighter pilot to convicted crooked Congressman
Both airmen would go on and become instructors at Top Gun. Cunningham went on to serve with VF-154 and eventually became CO of VF-126, an adversary unit playing the role of bad guys to train pilots in aerial combat.
Cunningham retired from the Navy as a commander in 1987. He started an aviation marketing company and became a Dean at an aviation school. He also became a regular on mainstream news as a military expert, bringing him to the attention of many politicians.
He won election easily in 1991, becoming a Republican congressman representing the wealthy suburbs north of San Diego.
His goals however, were not driven by public service, but by greed, and it ended up putting him in prison for several years. Cunningham resigned from the House in late 2005, after pleading guilty to federal charges for accepting at least $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors and under reporting his income. He pleaded guilty to tax evasion, conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud and wire fraud. Cunningham received a sentence of 8 years, 4 month in prison and pay $1.8 million in restitution.
He ended up serving 7 years, and was later pardoned by President Trump.
After release, he moved to Arkansas, and devoted much of his time to family, faith, and spoke often to military and civic groups about his life experiences. He was also President of the American Fighter Aces Association (AFAA).
They are the invisible heroes. The quiet heroes. The ones whose deeds go unnoticed.
One such hero is RK Smithley, an aerial firefighter with an outfit called 10 Tanker Air Carrier. I had the extreme honor of sitting down with him recently to talk about what he does on a daily basis. I am positive he wouldn’t want to be called a hero, but in a very real sense, he is precisely that.
Based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 10 Tanker Air Carrier operates a fleet of four DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft, each modified into a very large air tanker (VLAT) capable of delivering 9,400 gallons of fire retardant to combat wildfires across the United States and beyond. At the controls of one of these aerial giants is Captain RK Smithley, a veteran pilot whose journey from a small town in western Pennsylvania to the cockpit of a firefighting DC-10 is a tale of passion, precision, and purpose.
With a career spanning 25 years at World Airways, a stint in corporate aviation, and now 11 years with 10 Tanker, Smithley’s story is one of the most captivating I’ve ever heard. I sat down with him to dive into his roots, the adrenaline-fueled world of aerial firefighting, and the unique challenges of flying a DC-10 over raging wildfires.
His account, rich with technical detail and personal anecdotes, paints a vivid picture of life on the fire line. This is his story.
Smithley’s Background and His Journey into Fire Aviation
Captain RK Smithley in command of his DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Can you tell us about your background and where you’re from?
RK: I’m from Ligonier, a little place 50 miles east of Pittsburgh, out in Pennsylvania’s Laurel Mountains. It’s a small town, the kind where everybody knows your name. I don’t live in Albuquerque full-time; 10 Tanker flies its crews from their homes to wherever the airplanes are. I’d say half our guys live in the East, half in the West.
I live near Bristol, Tennessee now, moved there about a year ago from the Atlanta area. I worked for World Airways out of Peachtree City, Georgia, for many years. So I’m kind of a Delta snob—million-miler status, partly thanks to World Airways and partly 10 Tanker. We live wherever we want, and when it’s time to work, we book our own commercial flights, hotels, and rental cars. No travel department here; we do it all ourselves.
AvGeekery: Can you walk us through your aviation journey and how you ended up at 10 Tanker?
RK: I’m an Embry-Riddle grad, Class of ’83, Aeronautical Science. Started at World Airways in ’89 and worked there for 25 years. World was the primary carrier for military troop and cargo movements. It operated a fleet of DC-10s, MD-11s, and 747s. I started out in the DC-10, flew it for ten years, and then flew the MD-11 for 15 years. Never got to the 747.
I think we had four DC-10s when I joined World. I came off the 10 in 1999, but we operated them for another 5-7 years. We had also taken on new MD-11s from Douglas, sometime around ‘92 or ‘93. So we ended up with about 15 MD-11s and four 747s. The 747s were all freight. The MD-11s were both passenger and cargo. The DC-10s were combi DC-10-30s. Believe it or not, at various points in the year, we’d convert them from passengers to cargo and cargo to passengers. I was all set to upgrade to the 747 once World got a fifth one, but it ended up getting canceled, so I stayed on the MD-11.
When World folded in 2014, I became chief pilot for a corporate 135 operation in Kennesaw, Georgia. They hired me to take them to 121. It was fine, the commute was great –30 minutes– but I wasn’t happy. Too much work, not enough joy.
Then, buddies of mine from World who’d joined 10 Tanker told me about bombing fires from 250 feet at 170 miles an hour in a DC-10. I thought, “You’re kidding.” My replacement as chief pilot at World was already here, and he sold me on it. Eleven years ago, I joined 10 Tanker, and I haven’t looked back.
A Day in the Life of a DC-10 Aerial Firefighting Captain
IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Take me through the process of being called up for duty. How does that work?
RK: If it’s outside of a normal shift, we will get the call and deploy. Again, we don’t have a travel department, so we make all the arrangements, from booking flights to accommodations and rental cars.
AvGeekery: So right now, you’re at a hotel in Albuquerque, which is where 10 Tanker is based. Tell me what a typical day looks like for you.
RK: We basically show up at a tanker base at whatever time they want us there—typically 0900, but if we’re working an active fire, it could be 0800 or even 0700 for what’s called a campaign fire, those massive blazes that cover thousands and thousands of acres and burn for days on end. The planning starts with a base briefing within the first hour of duty. They’ll cover what’s happening in the fire world, what they’re anticipating for the day, and where the different assets are located—other tankers, leadplanes that guide our drops, and air attack platforms, which are like forward air controllers orbiting overhead, managing the airspace above the fire.
Our four DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft at 10 Tanker are spread out across the West. Right now, for example, there’s one in Pocatello, Idaho, another in Moses Lake, Washington, a third in Santa Maria, California, and mine’s here in Albuquerque. We stay connected with the other crews, chatting via text to give each other a heads-up on what we’re seeing out there. When we’re ordered to a fire, we send emails to all flight crew members and management, detailing where we’re going, where we’re at, and where we’re expected to reload with more retardant. There’s a lot of communication going on—it’s critical to keep everyone in the loop.
A dispatch order for a new fire | IMAGE: RK Smithley
While we wait for the call, the airplane sits ready, and so does the flight crew—captain, copilot, and flight engineer. When the phone rings, the base hands me, as the captain, a piece of paper—the dispatch order.
It’s got everything we need: latitude and longitude coordinates, a descriptive location of the fire, and sometimes hazards like wires, cell towers, or windmills. It’ll note if structures are threatened or specifics about the terrain, like when we were working the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, New Mexico, which was technically just across the border in Arizona, on Navajo Indian land. That detail’s included, though it doesn’t change our approach.
The order also has contact information and, most importantly, our operating radio frequencies. It lists who’s been ordered to the fire—other tankers, leadplanes, air attack—though it’s not always a complete list, so we’ll ask if we need to confirm who’s out there.
Once we get that paper, we head to the airplane and plug the coordinates into the navigation systems, which take nine minutes to spool up and come online. Meanwhile, the ground crew is loading 9,400 gallons of red retardant into the three external tanks on the belly of the DC-10—what we call the “canoe.” That process takes 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the base’s setup.
About 20 minutes after getting the order, we’re starting engines and heading to the fire. From Albuquerque, we could be dispatched anywhere. The other day, we were working Oak Ridge near Gallup, got back to base, and thunderstorms rolled in, parking us for a bit. When a weather corridor opened, we were ready to go back, but the base called on the radio: “Hey, we’ve got a divert for you.” They sent a new order, redirecting us to a fire just south of Prescott, Arizona—a 50-minute flight one way.
Another example: we recently started a shift in Mesa, Arizona, working a fire near St. George, Utah, reloading at Mesa Gateway. On the second run, they asked, “Do you have fuel to get to Pocatello?”
I said, “Yeah, why?” They told us to recover there—they were done with us for the day.
Flexibility is everything.
RK Smithley
I think they were spreading out the assets since two DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft were already at Mesa, and they wanted one in the Great Basin area. So, we spent one night in Pocatello before relocating to Albuquerque for the Oak Ridge fire. You never know where you’ll end up at the start of the day, so we always carry our bags with us. We might not check out of the hotel, but the room’s empty, and our stuff’s on the airplane in case we’re relocated.
That’s the reality of this job—flexibility is everything.
AvGeekery: You said when you get dispatched, you get a list of all confirmed assets heading to the fire. What exactly do you look for?
Tanker 10 DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with other firefighting assets including MD-87 and RJ85s | IMAGE: Tanker 10
RK: Most critically, we cannot drop without a leadplane, as DC-10s are not initial attack qualified—unlike lighter tankers such as MD-87s, C-130s, BA-146s, and RJ85s, which can drop with only air attack oversight. We’re actively working to change that, though. We conducted extensive training during the offseason to prepare for initial attack certification for the DC-10.
For now, we rely on leadplanes, but initial attack air tankers can operate with just an air attack platform providing aerial supervision, communicating directly with air attack about their objectives. Meanwhile, air attack coordinates with the incident commander on the ground—if there is one. On new fires, ground crews often haven’t arrived yet, so there’s no one to coordinate with on the ground.
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with an OV-10 Bronco leadplane | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The air attack platform, typically a Rockwell 690, orbits above the stack, though some operators have begun using Pilatus PC-12s or even Citations. They manage the temporary flight restriction (TFR) area, overseeing the entire operation. The United States Forest Service (USFS) uses KingAir 250 GTs for leadplanes, and CAL FIRE uses the OV-10 Bronco for both lead and air attack.
If neither the air attack nor the leadplane is airborne, we don’t launch. We coordinate with the base to ensure the lead is in the air, giving them a 10-minute head start to the fire. Even if they’re on the ground and say they’re preparing to take off, we wait until they’re airborne—mechanical issues could delay them, and we don’t want to arrive first and waste fuel circling. Our DC-10 external tank system is not certified to land loaded, unlike many other tankers.
If we can’t drop, we’d have to jettison the retardant safely—but only if there’s no lead at the fire and no other nearby fires with a leadplane we could divert to. So once we’re airborne, we need complete assurance that we can reach the fire and make the drop.
That’s why it’s crucial to see those assets listed on the dispatch sheet. If they aren’t, we always confirm the Lead is en route to the fire and where they are coming from, so we can coordinate our arrival time. It helps to know if there’ll be four other tankers and a bunch of S2s, especially when working with CAL FIRE in California. If it’s going to be a busy fire with a lot of aircraft—a real gaggle—you might add extra fuel because you’ll likely be holding for a while before your turn to drop.
Go-Time: Flying the Mission
RK Smithley (right) with copilot and flight engineer aboard a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft | IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Who’s on board the aircraft with you on a mission?
RK: Our missions require a captain, a copilot, and a flight engineer. These are not MD-10s. These are true DC-10s with a flight engineer.
AvGeekery: You’ve got your orders, you have the asset sheet, you know where you’re going. Now it’s go-time. What’s it like flying a mission? Can you share some of the details and what goes into making a drop happen?
A DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft comes in for the drop behind a King Air leadplane | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: We enter the temporary flight restriction (TFR) area—picture a red circle on a map, like at a NASCAR race—at 170 knots, configured and slowed down. DC-10s aren’t initial attack qualified, unlike lighter tankers such as MD-87s or C-130s, so we rely on a leadplane to guide our drops.
At 12 miles out, we call: “Lead 7-5, Tanker 910, 12 east.” The lead assigns us an altitude, altimeter setting, and our position in the stack—maybe we’re first, maybe fifth. On busy fires, we might hold at an Initial Point (IP), 10 to 20 miles from the fire, named something like “Station IP” at 7,000 feet. We circle in left turns, listening to other aircraft on the radio, though heavy smoke can obscure them, so we lean on radio chatter for situational awareness.
We monitor FM air-to-ground radios 50 to 60 miles out to gauge the fire’s pace, picking up altitudes and altimeter settings, allowing us to descend to the entry altitude before arriving.
Air attack platforms—Rockwell 690s, Pilatus PC-12s, or sometimes Citations—orbit above in right turns, acting as forward controllers, while we maintain left turns unless cleared for a right turn due to the drop path. They coordinate with ground incident commanders, who rarely speak to us directly; instructions flow from the ground to air attack, then to the leadplane, and finally to us.
It’s a tightly choreographed process. For campaign fires—massive blazes spanning thousands of acres over days—an IP is usually established. For new fires, there might not be one, so we hold wherever directed until the lead is ready.
Yankin' and Bankin': A DC-10 Aerial Firefighting Captain's Life on the Fire Line 146
Once cleared, the leadplane guides us, detailing the drop zone and hazards like power lines, helicopter dip sites, or cell towers. While we operate at different altitudes than helicopters or smaller tankers like S2s or RJ-85s, our DC-10’s wake is significant, so there’s a three-minute rule post-drop to let it dissipate, similar to the five-mile spacing at major airports like Hartsfield for heavy in-trail spacing. The lead may perform a “show me” run, flying low to mark the start and stop points, about a thousand feet below us.
On the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, we were V-ing off structures for protection—laying a retardant line one way, circling back, and angling another to form a protective V. I’ve made five or six runs from a single 9,400-gallon load, boxing in assets like a cell tower or the Wilson Observatory above Ontario [California]. They’ll say, “Start here, stop at that two-track road,” and our system allows precise “start-stop” drops.
The retardant is red so we can see previous drops, letting us “tag” the end of another tanker’s line and extend it—straight or angled—to build walls around the fire. We’re not extinguishing; we’re slowing the fire to give ground firefighters, who have the toughest job, a chance to control and extinguish it.
IMAGE: 10 Tanker
We might drop in the same area as the prior tanker or on the opposite side if their objective is complete. We think in terms of the fire’s head, flanks, and heel for situational awareness. My critical task is maintaining a consistent altitude—say, 250 feet—at 147 knots with a 60,000-pound fuel load for range (one hour out, one back, one reserve). With 85,000 pounds of retardant exiting in as little as five seconds, it takes constant elevator inputs and stabilizer trim to hold that altitude. A climb from 250 to 500 feet makes the line wispy, and the lead or air attack will call it out: “What the heck happened to that?”
Coverage levels are tailored to terrain. On Oak Ridge, in Gallup’s high desert, we used a lighter setting for grass—around 700 gallons a second, coverage level three or four—versus 950 gallons a second for heavy timber at level six or eight, which shortens the line but ensures thicker coating.
We coordinate with the lead during their “show me” run: “At coverage level eight, we won’t reach that road. Want a six?”
They might respond, “Yeah, six gives us 11 seconds to hit that point,” or stick with eight and let the next tanker extend.
It’s a blend of science, tactics, and constant communication to deliver that retardant exactly where it’s needed, every time.
AvGeekery: What’s the process of preparing and loading the fire retardant slurry onto the aircraft?
Loading the slurry onto the DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: When we get a dispatch order, the first thing we do is check the fuel load and the fire’s location to plan our approach. The DC-10’s got some unique constraints that drive our decisions.
For instance, it’s not certified to land with a load of retardant, and believe it or not, it’s also not certified to pressurize with a load onboard.
So, we’re flying to the fire unpressurized, which limits our altitude. We typically operate in the 11,000 to 13,000-foot range if we need to clear mountains, using supplemental oxygen. Since we don’t use full-face masks, we’re limited to a maximum altitude of 18,000 feet with that setup. The DC-10 can’t pressurize until the load is gone. It just wasn’t certified to do that. Once it’s gone, you can go to FL280.
We also have a limitation where we can’t certify RVSM [Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum], which caps us at 28,000 feet even after dropping, though we can climb that high on the way home if needed.
For a long dispatch—say, a 500-mile trip—it sometimes makes more sense to fly high and fast, empty, to save fuel, then land at a base closer to the fire, refuel, and load the retardant there. That’s happened three times in the last week across our fleet.
When we decide to load at a base, we confirm the fuel load—typically 60,000 pounds for a one-hour outbound leg, one-hour return, and an hour’s reserve—and ensure it’s good for the mission. Once I, as the captain, give the go-ahead with “Yeah, you’re clear to load,” the ground crew gets to work. They plug three-inch lines into each of the three separate tanks on the bottom of the airplane—what we call the “canoe” hanging off the belly.
Each tank on the DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft can hold 9,400 gallons of retardant. | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Those tanks hold 9,400 gallons of retardant, and loading usually takes 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the base. As soon as it’s done, we’re off and running, ready to head to the fire with a full load, unpressurized, and prepped for the drop. It’s a streamlined process, but every decision—fuel, altitude, load—ties into the mission’s demands and the airplane’s unique setup.
Tanker 10 team posing in front of the “canoe.” IMAGE: Tanker 10
The Rules and Regulations of Fire Aviation
AvGeekery: So you’re on a six-day-on, one-day-off schedule. What does a typical shift look like for you and your airplane?
RK: My shift is 11 days, then a week off, then another 11. We’re training a new captain now to get us to two captains per airplane, with the hopes of achieving a two-week on, two off schedule. He’s a fire veteran, so we just need to teach him the DC-10. The airplane works six days, then gets a maintenance day for TLC. This includes tire and brake changes, MEL items, or planned inspections. The mechanics work really hard, and sometimes really late, to keep us flying, especially during busy seasons with seven-day coverage.
AvGeekery: How many drops can you make in a day, and are there FAA time regulations to which you must adhere?
RK: We’re governed by duty time and flight time limits, kind of like 121 operations in commercial aviation, but tailored to our unique mission. The maximum is a 14-hour duty day, and sometimes we push right up to that limit. If we start at seven or eight in the morning and go until dark, we’re hitting that 14-hour mark.
The rule is we have to complete our drops by sunset plus 30 minutes, but we can fly back in complete darkness to get back to base within the flight and duty time rules. That’s how we end up with some late nights.
Within a 24-hour period, we’re capped at eight hours of flight time. For the week, it’s a maximum of 36 flight hours over six days, and we sometimes get close to that or even encroach on it. If we exceed those limits, there are compensatory measures—like extra rest—but that gets into details that are a bit too complex. Essentially, we stick to 36 hours in six days as our hard limit.
A DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker drops a load | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
As for drops, the record for a DC-10 in a single day is 12, and let me tell you, that’s pushing it. It’s like Southwest turning 737s—fast, efficient, and a little mind-blowing for an airplane this size. It’s almost like a NASCAR pit stop in slow motion, with a ton going on.
We’re loading 9,400 gallons of retardant, fueling up, and the mechanics are doing the walk-around for us since we don’t bring steps to the airplane every run. They’re on the interphone, communicating the whole time, checking the aircraft so we don’t have to climb out of the cockpit.
The most I’ve personally done is nine or ten drops in a day, and that’s only possible when the fire is close, like 30 minutes or 30 miles away, say, the Cajon Pass fire, just 18 miles from our San Bernardino base. You’re back and forth, reloading nonstop, and those are rough days for the whole crew, mechanics included. Nobody gets a break.
Flying unpressurized adds to the challenge. The airplane’s air-conditioned, but when it’s 100 degrees on the ground, it gets hot, and that takes a toll. Combine that with the intensity and adrenaline of constant fire drops—flying low at 250 feet, 147 knots, banking hard—it’s exhausting.
Avgeekery: And no flight attendants to bring you drinks or snacks, either!
The gutted interior of a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: (laughing) Nope! But the bases do a great job of keeping us fed. We’ve got a cooler onboard with water, drinks, and snacks. They’ll toss lunches into a five-gallon Home Depot bucket, which we drop out the door and reel back up. Believe it or not, we’ve got a picnic table strapped down on the main deck, which is basically the same as a gutted UPS or FedEx freighter without the roller mats, where we can sit for a few minutes, eat, and stretch our legs away from the cockpit. Those brief moments help, but on a 12-drop day, it’s relentless. You’re running on fumes by the end, but it’s what we do to get the job done.
After an exhausting but successful day, the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft get ready to sleep for the night | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The DC-10: An Old Gal, but a Nimble Beast
Tanker 910 of the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: Does the plane handle differently when loaded versus empty when you’re flying back at FL280?
RK: Oh yeah, you definitely feel the difference, and it’s a big one. When we’re loaded with 9,400 gallons of retardant, we’re at 420,000 pounds, which is still 160,000 pounds under the max gross weight of 572,000 I flew in the DC-10-30s at World Airways. That gives us an incredible power-to-weight ratio—better than most air tankers out there, maybe except the Dash 8Q-400. All that thrust makes the DC-10 feel alive, like you’ve got power to spare. Power is life, you know.
But to your point about altitude, we don’t often fly high. For instance, after a drop on the Arizona fire, we came back at 17,500 feet VFR, heading northeast. We rarely get into the flight levels because it takes a lot of fuel to climb up there, and we have to weigh that against the winds and the length of the flight.
If it’s a long haul, sure, going higher might give us a smoother ride and better fuel efficiency, but New Mexico and Arizona right now? It’s constant low-level turbulence from the heat, and we’re dodging virga all the time. On the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, we got beat up pretty good by the rough air. One time, we parked the airplane when the weather was closing in, and me and the trainee were like, “We’re done.” Good call, too—winds were gusting to 58 knots not long after. It got strange out there.
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft completes a drop | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The biggest difference in handling comes during the mission itself. The DC-10 is an amazingly nimble airplane for its size, thanks to the leading edge slats—Douglas calls them slats, Boeing would call them leading edge flaps—and spoilers that help us roll.
I’ve never flown a fighter, but some of the videos you’ll see of us, we’re horsing this thing around like a big fighter jet. Picture coming down the side of a mountain in a turning drop, on the tip of the spear, trying to lay retardant exactly where the ground crews need it. We’re not doing it for show, but sometimes the terrain demands it. You’re yanking and banking hard, evaluating escape routes—what if an engine quits?—because a go-around is always an option.
There are places we can’t get into, where single-engine tankers or helicopters shine, but we can handle most anything else. We’re the biggest tool in the toolbox, delivering 9,400 gallons compared to a large air tanker’s 3,000. The air attack and leadplanes decide when to call in the VLAT, and we make it count.
On the way back, empty, the plane feels lighter and more responsive, but we don’t vary speed much—145 to 149 knots, usually 147, with a typical fuel load of 60,000 pounds for range: one hour out, one hour back, and an hour reserve to divert somewhere like Roswell if Albuquerque’s weathered out. For the Arizona run, we added 8,000 pounds of fuel for comfort with storms around. The lighter weight makes the plane more agile, but we’re still dodging turbulence and managing the mission’s demands. It’s a different beast empty, but the DC-10’s power and agility make it a joy to fly, loaded or not.
Face sheet for the DC-10 aerial firefighting fleet at 10 Tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: With DC-10s fading from commercial use, is it hard to get parts for the 10 Tanker fleet?
Spare engines for the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: Yes and no—it’s a mixed bag. The good news is that the Air Force’s decision to park their KC-10 fleet, which included 59 DC-10s, has been a real boon for us at 10 Tanker. They’re starting to release parts from those airframes, and we’ve already bought engines from them.
I’ve got a couple of buddies out at Travis Air Force Base in Sacramento who’ve been involved with the KC-10s, and they’ve confirmed the parts are becoming available. FedEx’s DC-10 and MD-10 fleet is another resource we tap into. In fact, 10 Tanker is likely going to buy some KC-10s outright just for parts.
I’ve heard the Air Force is keeping around 20 KC-10s in operational ready reserve, though I’m not certain of the exact number. That still leaves over 30 airframes available for us to pull structural parts from, which has made components more plentiful than they used to be.
The cool thing about our fleet at 10 Tanker is that we’re flying some of the last DC-10s ever built. Three of our four airplanes are 1987 and 1988 models, originally flown by Thai Airways, Japan Air System, and Northwest. The foundations of 10 Tanker were rooted with Omni International, principal owners out of Tulsa, who parked their DC-10s years ago. Those ended up becoming our tankers.
Our oldest bird, a 1975 model, is what we call our antique—an ex-Continental ship that started with Finnair—but it still flies and runs like a champ. These airframes are relatively low-time, especially compared to my days at World Airways, where we’d log 250 hours a month. At 10 Tanker, we’re only flying 250 to 400 hours a year, though it’s intense, rigorous flying—low-level drops at 250 feet, yanking and banking hard over fires. That kind of work demands thorough maintenance, and our off-season inspections are no joke.
Tanker 912 undergoing a C Check | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Our mechanics…I can’t say enough about them. They’re the unsung heroes keeping these planes airworthy. When our fire season wraps up in November, they dive into heavy checks at bases like San Bernardino or sometimes Albuquerque.
This past winter, Tanker 911 was in Oscoda, Michigan, at Kalitta for a C-check. Those guys work year-round, not just keeping the airplanes rolling during the season but doing deep maintenance to prep for the next year. For example, we got recalled to California in January—an extremely rare event—but our team was ready because of their meticulous off-season work.
The airframe I’m flying now has about 70,000 hours, which, in the grand scheme, isn’t bad for a DC-10. With the parts supply from the KC-10s and our maintenance program, we’re good to go for a while longer, keeping these old birds fighting fires with the best of them.
The 2025 Los Angeles Fires
10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft dropped more than 450,000 gallons of retardant on the 2025 LA Fires. Fire retardant, also known as Phos-Chek, is made up of 85% water, 10% salts, and 5% minor ingredients that make up the color to allow the containment lines to be seen from the air. It does not put out the fire, but decreases the intensity of the flames to help all of the hardworking ground crews. | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: Can you tell us about that January call-up to the devastating Los Angeles fires? How does that process unfold when you get that unexpected call?
RK: You’re at home, maybe visiting family or just kicking back after New Year’s, doing whatever. Chief pilot sends out an email blast to all the crews: “Hey, we got a new fire in L.A. or SoCal. We may need to send one, two, or three airplanes—whatever we can manage.”
In January, it’s rare—only the second time in 10 Tanker’s history we’ve flown in the U.S. that month, the last being around 2013 before I joined. This time, we could only send two DC-10s because the other two were in heavy maintenance. One was completely torn apart in Oscoda, Michigan, and the other in San Bernardino was too deep into its checks to fly. But we had two birds in Victorville, just coincidentally there for tank calibrations, so they were ready to go.
You start mentally preparing to head to Ontario to pick up an airplane.
Then the phone rings, and Chief Pilot’s on the line: “Hey, can you go to Ontario and get Tanker 914 in Victorville? Get a crew together.” He’ll say, “I’ve got B and C lined up for copilot and flight engineer. You’re A, the captain. Coordinate with those two and let me know how soon you can get there.”
That’s how it goes—you drop everything, pack a bag, and start heading west. For me, it was a bit of a push. When the Chief Pilot first called, I was like, “Eh, it’s just after New Year’s. I don’t want to go to work.” But he said, “We may need two airplanes.” I told him, “If you get the second airplane, I’ll go.” Sure enough, they needed the second one, so I went. Chief Pilot himself took the first airplane, and I led the second.
10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft at the 2025 LA fires | IMAGE: New York Times
It’s a scramble, but it’s what we do—roll with the punches to move an airplane and help people who need it, saving lives and property.
That SoCal mission was memorable, not just because it was January, but because of the impact. Those fires were small by our standards, about 12,000 acres compared to the 400,000-acre monsters I’ve worked. But they burned through 12,000 homes between the Palisades and the Eaton fires.
In our world, we get called for fires as small as a couple thousand acres, so 12,000 isn’t huge, but 12,000 homes? That’s massive. Flying over those black foundations, holding over what used to be people’s homes and, in some respects, their lives torn apart—it tears at you. It was one of the most poignant missions I’ve flown, not just for the urban devastation but because it was such an unusual event for us to be out there in January, something we’d only done once before in company history.
Chilean firefighters wave at a passing 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft in 2023 | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft drops water on a Chilean wildfire in 2023 | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
This kind of rapid response isn’t new for us. We’ve got an international presence, too. For years, I flew to Australia during their summer—our winter—for six years straight when I was new. We’ve done Chile in January or February, like two years ago, and Mexico, flying out of Laredo, Texas, into the Sierra Madre Mountains south of Monterey, the year before that. Those international call-ups work much the same: you get the word, you pack, you go. But that SoCal call in January? It stood out for its rarity and the emotional weight of seeing so many homes lost. It’s a reminder of why we do this—helping people when they need it most.
So You Want to be an Aerial Firefighter
AvGeekery: How does someone get into aerial firefighting? What’s the journey like for someone looking to join an outfit like 10 Tanker?
RK: Aerial firefighting is a tight-knit world, a club—way smaller than World Airways, where we had 500 pilots and crew. Here at 10 Tanker, we’ve got just 25 crew members, and across the whole country, there are only 35 big air tankers—BA-146s, C-130s, 737s, and our DC-10s–between the four different contract air tanker companies. That’s not counting the smaller S2s and C-130s used by CAL FIRE.
It’s an exclusive group, and you almost have to know somebody to get your foot in the door. That’s how I got in. I knew two guys from World Airways who’d jumped to 10 Tanker, and with my 3,300 hours of DC-10 time, it was a natural fit. They could teach me fire tactics, but I already knew the airplane. It’s tough to teach both fire and the aircraft from scratch, so you need one piece to start—either heavy jet experience or fire knowledge.
A McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Simulator | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Take our new hire this year, for example. He flew Single Engine Airtankers, or SEATs, so he knows fire inside and out–tactics, lingo, procedures. He also flew a corporate 737, so he’s got jet time. We just have to teach him the DC-10.
On the flip side, when I joined, I was the opposite: a DC-10 guy with zero clue about aerial firefighting. I’d been a volunteer ground firefighter at 16 in Pennsylvania, but aerial tactics? No idea. It’s extensive—there’s so much to think about.
After your first year, you go to a school called NAFA—National Aerial Firefighting Academy. It’s a three-level course where you learn the tactics and lingo, and it really opens your eyes. From there, you can start working toward the left seat as a captain.
The yoke of a DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with 10 Tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
I made captain in my second year because they needed me to, with my 3,300 hours in the DC-10, but it took time to learn fire. Even now, 11 years in, I’ll hear something from a colleague and think, “Oh, I didn’t know that.” You’re always learning, just like in 121 operations.
If you’re coming in fresh, one path is flying air attack platforms, like a Rockwell 690, orbiting above the fire in holding patterns all day. Your right-seater, an aerial fire supervisor, doesn’t need to be a pilot but handles comms with incident planners on the ground. That’s a great way to learn fire operations and build experience.
Another route is crop dusting—guys come out of Air Tractor AT-802s, either learning fire through that or bringing some fire knowledge and learning the airplane. You’ve got to have one of those pieces—fire experience or heavy jet time—and knowing someone in the business is almost a must. It’s no secret, no discrimination; it’s just the reality of a small field.
Crowds line up to tour a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting plane at an airshow | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
A couple of weeks ago, at an airshow here in Albuquerque, I was doing tours of our aircraft when a guy flying 737s for a major airline came up to me. He thought aerial firefighting sounded incredible. And it is, but you’ve got to have a screw loose to choose this over the airlines, where you can make a lot more money flying point A to point B, like driving a bus with wings. We’re not getting rich, but we’re well taken care of.
The real payoff is when you see a row of houses you saved—that’s a level of accomplishment you can’t get flying passengers. It gets in your blood, just like ground firefighting did for me as a second-generation volunteer firefighter in Pennsylvania. I did that for 16 years, and now I’ve come full circle with aerial firefighting. Aviation’s in my blood, too, so combining the two? My blood’s pretty rich.
Our youngest captain is 27, and I’m thinking, “Why isn’t he at Delta, American, or Southwest?” He might go there someday, but he came from flying air attack and decided he wanted to fly a tanker. He’s getting it done. How long will he stay? Who knows—maybe he’ll retire at 60 or 65. We don’t have an age limit; one of our lead pilots is 70.
Underbelly of a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
You can fly till you drop if you want, but I’ll tell you, this isn’t a game for old guys. I’m an old guy myself, and it wears on you. Eight legs a day, and you’re so beat you can barely eat at the hotel before crashing, hoping for a shower and some sleep before another eight-legged tour tomorrow.
Younger guys handle it better, but we old-timers still do it well. It’s a lot of work, and there’s a lot of boredom too—sitting at the base for days, especially early in the season, screwing around on Facebook, reading books, or shopping on Amazon. Then the phone rings, and your hair’s on fire. You’re moving to the airplane, and by the end of the day, you might be five states north.
It’s a different lifestyle—no epaulettes, no black plain-toed shoes, no herding flight attendants. I wear a 10 Tanker shirt, shorts, tennis shoes, and a Nomex flight suit, growing whatever facial hair I feel like. It’s freeing, but man, it’s intense. Once firefighting and aviation get in your system, you don’t want to leave. It’s a calling, and for those who want in, it’s about finding that one piece—jet time or fire knowledge—and making the right connections to break into this small, incredible world.
AvGeekery: RK, it has been an absolute pleasure speaking with you today. I learned so much, and I’m sure our readers will, too. Any final thoughts or memorable moments you’d like to share?
RK: My favorite hat says “Yankin’ and Bankin’”—a phrase I dropped during a TV interview a few years back at a Salt Lake hotel, and some folks liked it so much they made hats for it. That’s pretty much what we do in these DC-10s—yank and bank, horsing these big birds around like fighters to get the retardant where it needs to go. We’re incredibly proud at 10 Tanker to be the largest tool in the Forest Service’s arsenal, carrying 9,400 gallons per drop.
There’s a place for every tanker out there—single-engine air tractors, helicopters, lighter tankers like the MD-87s or C-130s—but when they call us, we’re all in, no matter what. Doesn’t matter if we’re in New Mexico, California, or halfway across the globe in Australia or Chile. We’re dedicated to the job, giving it everything we’ve got.
What drives us is supporting the ground firefighters. Those guys and gals have the toughest, most important job of all, battling the flames up close. Our role is to help them get a handle on the fire, building those red retardant walls to slow it down and protect lives and property. That’s what it’s all about. This work gets in your blood, just like ground firefighting did when I was a volunteer in Pennsylvania.
I wouldn’t trade this work for anything—it’s a calling, and I’m proud to be part of it.
The 10 Tanker team in front of a DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft from the 10 Tanker fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery extends heartfelt thanks to Captain RK Smithley and the entire 10 Tanker Air Carrier team for granting us this insightful interview. We deeply appreciate your unwavering dedication and service to protecting lives and property across the nation.
To learn more about 10 Tanker, visit their website at 10tanker.com.
With its distinctive ring around its fuselage, the Wellington DWI (Directional Wireless Installation) aircraft was effective against Germany’s magnetic mines during World War II. Following British successes in defending against mines with the technology, the Germans installed similar systems on their aircraft.
The Wellington DWI with its Distinctive Ring Which Detonated German magnetic Mines. | Image: WorldsWarPhotos.info
Allied Shipping Faced Dangers From German Magnetic Mines
The unique Wellington DWI modified bomber aircraft was designed to combat German magnetic mines during the Second World War. In the early days of the war, Luftwaffe aircraft were dropping mines in British coastal waters, presenting a severe hazard to Allied shipping.
Aluminum Ring Powered by Automobile Engine
British engineers devised a solution to install an aluminum ring on the Wellington. They also added a Ford V8 automobile engine in the fuselage to create and send an electric current to the ring, which would generate a magnetic field. This ring, a circular coil 51 feet in diameter, was inside a balsa wood covering.
Wellington DWI in Flight: Image: historyofwar.org
The basic mission was for the Wellington DWI to fly low over water, and the magnetic field in the ring would trigger German magnetic mines and make them detonate. They conducted successful tests of the system in December 1939. The first successful mission with a DWI Aircraft occurred on 8 January 1940 near Manston, a town near the English Channel coast.
Challenges Faced by Wellington DWI Crews
The ring system presented some unique challenges for flight crews. First, the aircraft had to fly very low and were in danger from the exploding magnetic mines. Crew determined that they could fly no lower than 35 feet above the water, and the RAF set a standard altitude of 60 feet. Despite this, the explosions still rattled the aircraft quite a bit.
During a test flight on 13 January 1940, the Wellington DWI accidentally dropped below 35 feet, and when the mine exploded, the crew stated the aircraft was “thrown” up in the air.
Engine Fumes Made Conditions Difficult For Flight Crews
A second variant of the DWI had a De Havilland Gypsy Six engine, which produced a more powerful current. The Gypsy version was called the Mark II. Both this and the V8 produced fumes inside the aircraft, often causing “violent nausea” among the crew.
Wellington DWI Aircraft on the Ground Near Ismalia, Egypt. | Image: historyofwar.org
Altogether, the British converted as many as 15 Wellingtons to the DWI models with the rings. The basic mission outline was a formation of three DWIs.
On 11 May 1940, DWIs participated in a mission to evacuate Dutch Queen Wilhelmina and members of her family and her government from the Netherlands during the German invasion. They escaped on a British destroyer, and DWIs helped clear mines so the ship could escape.
Wellington DWI Aircraft Provide Valuable Support For Allied Armies
Following this, the DWIs deployed to Ismalia, Egypt, and flew missions over Alexandria Harbor, the Suez Canal, and the African coast. Their ability to clear mines proved to be essential support for the Allied armies advancing in Northern Africa.
German Develop their Own Anti-Mine Ring Systems
The Wellington DWI proved so effective that the Germans developed similar designs to combat British magnetic mining of the Baltic and North Seas. In 1939, the Luftwaffe modified a Junker Ju-52/3m transport aircraft with a 46-foot diameter ring. Like the Wellington, the ring on the Ju-52/3m, which the Germans called the “MS Minensuche(mine search)” aircraft, was an aluminum coil encased in balsa wood.
They attached the ring to the wings with plywood struts. The German aircraft used diesel and gasoline motors mounted in the fuselage to power 150-kilowatt generators to provide electricity to their rings.
Acoustic Mines Create More Challenges for Germans
When the British also began using acoustic mines, the Germans responded by adding new devices to their Junkers. These “KK-Gerät (Knallkörpergerät, or mine destruction devices)” aircraft carried 30 22-pound explosive charges, which would destroy the hydrophones (microphones)on the mines.
During their missions, two MS Minensuchemine search planes would fly next to each other at 32 – 65 feet, and the KK-Gerät aircraft would fly about 130 feet behind them. This put them in danger from explosions caused by the first planes.
The Germans eventually deployed these aircraft as far south as the Mediterranean, with their most critical and dangerous area along the French coast. The aircraft conducted mine sweeping operations until the end of the war.
These high-tech (for their time) developments by both sides to combat magnetic mines during World War II were examples of what Winston Churchill called the “Battle of the Boffins,” the continuous scientific battle to develop the most advanced weapons and tactics in the early days of the war.