Home Blog Page 85

Exclusive Interview: Space Shuttle Discovery’s Last Pilot Col. Eric Boe

0

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — NASA astronaut Col. Eric A. Boe, who piloted the final flight of space shuttle Discovery ten years ago this week, recalls the exciting 13-day mission to service the International Space Station.

The 133rd space shuttle flight delivered tons of supplies, including water and oxygen, to the orbital laboratory in February and March 2011. Discovery’s six-person crew also left the Leonardo multi-purpose module docked to the station.

5513154884 71c10018f5 k
STS-133 Commander Steve Lindsey, Pilot Eric Boe and Mission Specialists Alvin Drew, Steve Bowen, Michael Barratt, and Nicole Stott pose post-landing with Discovery on March 9, 2011. (NASA)

On March 9, 2011, Boe and mission commander Steven Lindsay piloted Discovery to a safe landing at the Kennedy Space Center. In total, Discovery spent a combined 365 days in space; orbited the Earth 5,830 times, and traveled a distance of 148,221,675 miles during 39 flights.

In an exclusive interview with this aerospace journalist, the former U.S. Air Force fighter and test pilot discusses his feelings related to the space flight. From the emotions of the mission to his piloting time around the space station.

Eric A. Boe: From a CAP Student to NASA Astronaut

Eric Boe’s career in aviation began as he joined the Civil Air Patrol which is an auxiliary of the Air Force. This took Eric toward earning his pilot’s license and his first solo at age 16.

Col. Eric Boe: “For me I was always interested in aviation. I’m the person when I’m out there and I hear some noise in the sky whether it’s a bird or an airplane I’m looking up there checking it out,” Boe explained with a smile as we began.

“I was very interested in the military and wanted to be a military pilot and Civil Air Patrol was a chance to see those things. I decided to go to the Air Force academy, and CAP was a good place to start.”

5711298991 0a24d00250 k
NASA ASTRONAUT ERIC A. BOE DISCUSSES SPACE AND AVIATION WITH AEROSPACE JOURNALIST CHARLES A. ATKEISON.

Charles A Atkeison: Moments before boarding Discovery all of us smiled during your crew huddle at the base of the launch pad just hours before lift-off.

Col. Boe: “We had a huddle as a team, we just said a quick prayer, and just said looking forward to the mission, and let us do well. It was a good way to get ready for the mission and to give us some focus before we get on the rocket to go.”

The Role of a Space Shuttle Pilot

Charles: During the launch, discuss what the pilot is doing during the ascent.

Col. Boe: “The pilot is basically operating all the major systems that are on the shuttle. The main engines. I have the switches for shutdown the engines, starting the engines; (switches) for any type of leaks or any other thing. I monitor the systems for the main engines as we go up hill. Also, all the electrical power switches that we have on one side. Auxiliary power units actually provide all the hydraulic power to basically move the engines bells on ascent.

We actually move the flight control surfaces to do what we call load relief, but as you’re going through the atmosphere, because the wings of the shuttle are producing lift because the wind forces blowing on them, we actually move the flight control surfaces as we’re going uphill.”

Charles: Share with me your feeling of the Cupola node (aboard the space station). I’m a big fan of the Cupola, you have a big 360-degree field of space… Is it a man-cave? How would you describe it?

Col. Boe: “Yes, that’s a good way to describe it. It’s an awesome facility to see. The 360-degree field of view, you can’t say enough good things about it. One of the things it really helps us do is we do a lot of robotics and spacewalks, and we can set it up to watch through a window.

522708main s133e007740 hires
Eric Boe and space station resident Cady Coleman work controls in the Destiny laboratory of the International Space Station during Discovery’s visit in 2011. (NASA)

One of the things that great view gives us is the ability to move that (station’s) arm around and grab things. And, then a secondary benefit of that is when you have some free time, we have a gym there that’s right below it and when no one is in front of you you can actually work out and be looking out and see the planet — it’s such an amazing view.”

Charles: What types of music did you bring on board?

Col. Boe: “I brought up a wide selection, I have a a whole bunch of varied songs… I guess, I probably grew up in the 80’s, so I have a lot of 80’s kind of rock, I have some newer stuff as well. Just a wide variety of different kinds of music. It’s very nice at the end of the day. You get a little bit of wind-down time as you’re getting ready to sleep. So a lot of people as they’re winding down in their sleeping bag usually put their ear phones in and listen to a little bit of music.”

Charles: Now after undocking from space station, you had your chance to fly Discovery around the outpost before heading home. What was on your mind as you navigate what I like to call the ‘White Dove’ on the ocean of space?

Col. Boe: (Laughs) “I haven’t heard that term, the White Dove, that’s good, well put. The (station) is amazingly big. We were actually — when we were docked — probably the biggest the space station was going to be in the near future. We had the space shuttle up there, and we had the ATV European vehicle, we had the Japanese HTV which we reached out and grapple with. And, we attached the last module that’s going on the space station in the near future.


And, we also had the Russian vehicles. And, as we’re flying around we take the vehicle out. Discovery flies just a dream, she’s a dream ship — the dream machine is the way I like to say. (She) flies very well, very responsive when you put in the controls.

The one thing you can’t really reproduce on the ground is the ‘boom’ of the reaction control system jets, it’s such a deep bass… It’s a good chance to also survey the vehicle.”

5512333441 3a3c53f817 k
Space shuttle Discovery lands at the Kennedy Space Center for the final time in March 2011. (NASA/KSC)

Charles: Was the fly around one of your toughest challenges as a pilot?

Col. Boe: “We train over and over again so by the time you do it you feel very comfortable doing it. There’s some work involved like most of the tasks on board there very do able… There’s the challenge you want to do the best you can do… it’s a task you can do it in your sleep is how I like to say it.”

Charles: Thank-you.

Today, Discovery remains on public display at the Smithsonian’s Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center in Dulles, Virginia. Eric Boe remains a critical part of the astronaut corps based at the Johnson Space Center near Houston.

(Charles A Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

Blue Angels to Headline Saturday’s ‘Festival of Flight’ Airshow

PENSACOLA, Fla. — The U.S. Navy Blue Angels will launch into their 75th anniversary season on Saturday with a single day air show from Southern California.

The inaugural Festival of Flight air show is scheduled for March 13, from the home of the Blue Angels winter training grounds at NAF El Centro. High-flying performances by a variety of military aircraft are also scheduled to perform from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. PST.

The military jet performances for the Festival of Flight will be closed to the public due to Covid-19 concerns. Only a live radio broadcast will be available.

6537269
the Blue Angels perform the Line Abreast Loop maneuver during a February training flight over NAF El Centro. The 2021 season will be the Blues’ first year flying the Super Hornet. (U.S. Navy MCS2 Cody Hendrix)

“We want everyone to enjoy the festival and the aviation demonstration teams which will be performing and broadcast in a virtual space,” NAF El Centro commanding officer Capt. William Perkins said. “Although we cannot accommodate a public viewing on or near the base, we will be providing the experience through live radio broadcast and following up the festival with short videos highlights which enable a safe, virtual, contactless experience.”

Residents in the Imperial Valley can tune to radio stations 107.5 FM or 1230 AM for live air show commentary. The stations presently do not stream via the Internet.

The Imperial Valley show will mark the Blue Angels first full show featuring their F/A-18E/F Super Hornets. The squadron upgraded from the smaller legacy hornets last November.

“We deeply appreciate the expertise and operational knowledge Blue Angels past and present have brought to the team,” Blue Angels commanding officer Cmdr. Brian Kesselring said. “We look forward to enhancing our operations as we fully transition to flying the Super Hornet.”

Performances will also include the Air Force’s A-10C Thunderbolt II and the Navy’s F/A-18F TACDEMO from NAS Lemoore. The Navy Leapfrogs jump team and the Marine Corps’ MV-22 Osprey are also scheduled to perform.

12:30 p.m. U.S. Navy Parachute Team – The Leapfrogs
12:45 p.m. VFA-122 F/A-18F TACDEMO
13:05 p.m. VMM-163 MV-22 (Osprey) Demo
13:20 p.m. USAF A-10 Thunderbolt II Demo
13:45 p.m. VFA-122 F/A-18F TACDEMO
14:30 p.m. U.S. Navy Blue Angels

The Blue Angels are scheduled to perform 53 flight demonstrations at 28 locations across the United States and Canada during 2021.

(Charles A Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

WATCH: Incredible Air-to-Air Imagery of the New Blue Angels Super Hornets

0

Tasty Stuff Shot From the Back Seat of #7

During December of 2020, the United States Navy Flight Demonstration Team, the Blue Angels, completed their transition to their new Boeing F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet aircraft. The team took the opportunity to use one of their “legacy” #7 F/A-18D two-seater Hornets to shoot some truly magnificent air-to-air video and still photography. In the back seat of the photo jet was none other than MC2(SW) Cody Hendrix. Hendrix captured some beautiful imagery and some of the video and stills were uploaded to YouTube by AirshowStuffVideos. Enjoy!

[youtube id=”lP1YrS2JrHc” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Blues Never Seem to Get the Pick of the Litter

It’s not widely publicized but the Blue Angels, going back to the A-4F Skyhawk era, flew some of the most “experienced” airframes in the service. The Super Hornet era will be no different. There are no new-build or even recent-build airframes wearing those striking blue and gold colors. All 11 team jets (nine F/A-18Es and 2 F/A-18Fs) are either early production aircraft used primarily as test aircraft and/or have been in long-term storage at one time or another. At least one of the jets was used for the aerial sequences in TOP GUN: Maverick.

6534968a
US Navy image by MC2(SW) Cody Hendrix

Blue Angels 2021 Team Officers and Key Enlisted Men

#1 Commander BRIAN C. KESSELRING USN- Flight Leader / Commanding Officer

#2 Lieutenant Commander JAMES HALEY USN- Right Wing

#3 Major FRANK ZASTOUPIL USMC- Left Wing

#4 Lieutenant Commander JAMES COX USN- Slot

#5 Commander BEN WALBORN USN- Lead Solo

#6 Lieutenant Commander CARY RICKOFF USN- Opposing Solo

6534969a
US Navy image by MC2(SW) Cody Hendrix

#7 Lieutenant JULIUS BRATTON USN- Narrator

#8 Lieutenant KATLIN FORSTER USN- Events Coordinator

Commander TODD ROYLES USN- Executive Officer

Captain RICK ROSE USMC- C-130J “Fat Albert” Pilot

Captain WILLIAM HUCKEBA USMC- C-130J “Fat Albert” Pilot

Captain JACKSON STREIFF USMC- C-130J “Fat Albert” Pilot

6534970a
US Navy image by MC2(SW) Cody Hendrix

Lieutenant BRIAN ABE USN- Maintenance Officer

Lieutenant HENRY CEDEÑO USN- Assistant Maintenance Officer

Lieutenant MONICA L. BORZA USN- Flight Surgeon

Lieutenant KRISTIN A. TOLAND USN- Supply Officer

Lieutenant CHELSEA DIETLIN USN- Public Affairs Officer

CMDCM(AW/SW) Eric McDermott USN- Command Master Chief

AVCM(AW/SW) James Hernandez USN- Maintenance Master Chief

6435695a
US Navy image by MC2(SW) Cody Hendrix

NASA’s Martian Helicopter ‘Ingenuity’ Nears First Flight

0

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A small helicopter attached to the NASA rover Perseverance will soon take off to conduct the first flight of an aircraft on another world.

The drone-style helicopter known as Ingenuity will provide the Red Planet with a first of its kind air show as soon as early April. During a 30-day window, engineers hope to perform up to five flight tests, each building on the previous flight.

At $85 million, the Ingenuity program is an investment in understanding aviation in the very thin Martian atmosphere. The planet’s surface pressure is only .088% that of Earth’s, and this may make it difficult to provide the necessary lift in order to fly.

NASA animation simulates how Ingenuity will operate on the surface of Mars.

“When the Wright Brothers flew for the first time, they flew an experimental aircraft,” Ingenuity’s chief pilot Håvard Grip explained. “In the same way, the Mars helicopter is designed to show we can fly a powered helicopter flight in the Martian atmosphere.”

NASA to Conduct the First Martian Air Show

Controlled from NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, Ingenuity will be lowered from the belly of Perseverance. Signals from Earth will then detach the copter and it will drop a few inches to the Martian surface and land on its four legs.

Perseverance will roll away exposing the copter to direct Sun light to charge its six lithium-ion batteries. The rover will travel to an area 330-feet north of the copter’s flight zone known as Twitcher’s Point.

“The helicopter will then have a 30-Martian-day (31-Earth-day) experimental flight test window,” NASA JPL spokesperson DC Agle said. “If Ingenuity survives its first bone-chilling Martian nights – where temperatures dip as low as minus 130 degrees Fahrenheit – the team will proceed with the first flight of an aircraft on another world.”

25287 Helicopter landing composite web
Ingenuity hovers over the air field while Perseverance records the flight from Twitcher’s point.

Ingenuity is autonomous and will not be controlled by a joystick on Earth due to the 130 million miles between the two planets. The aerial vehicle is designed to fly, land, communicate, manage its energy, and keep warm autonomously.

According to DC Agle, innovative mathematical algorithms will allow flight in the thin atmosphere and track the helicopter’s flight path.

The twin rotor blade rotorcraft has a fuselage about the size of a tissue box. It weighs four pounds on Earth, however on Mars its weight is just 1.5 pounds.

Each flight test will launch from a 30×30-foot airfield near Jezero Crater. JPL engineers will fly Ingenuity up to an altitude of 10-15 feet, and about 160-feet down range. Each of the five flights will last up to 90 seconds.

Two cameras are built-in to the craft to record images during flight. One color for capturing views of the nearby terrain, and one black and white for navigation.

There will be no real time video of the flights. JPL estimates it will take two days to receive the three color and four black-and-white images from Ingenuity first flight.

Meanwhile, Perseverance is expected to capture the flight with images, video, and audio of the first powered flight on Mars.

(Charles A Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

TOP GUN: Maverick Lego Trailer You Have to See to Believe

Gaze Awestruck at the Product of One Man’s Dedication to His Favorite (Unreleased) Film

As of this moment, the official release date for TOP GUN: Maverick is (still a moving target). It was 2 July 2021 at one point, but now they’re talking about a November 2021 release date. It’s fair to say that among Avgeeks the supersonic sequel is the most anticipated movie release since, well, since the last time a great aviation film was released.

When was that exactly? Anyway, you’ve probably seen the trailers for TOP GUN: Maverick (they’re linked in the piece below) but we have a unique and highly entertaining take on Official Trailer 2 for you. Take a look at this awesome version done completely in LEGO!

The video was created by and uploaded to YouTube by Augustus Danko (Onbeatman). Danko said that he created the entire project, one frame at a time, using only a Canon t6i camera, a 2017 iMac, and a 2011 MacBook Pro. The project took Danko several months to complete (no surprise there!) and was not supported in any way by the studio or the producers.

That’s dedication. Augustus will probably be one of the first in line when the film is released. Below are Danko’s LEGO trailer and the trailer on which it was based for direct comparison. Remarkable!

Check out all our latest content. Here are our most recent posts:

Even though the sequel doesn’t feature the beloved Grumman F-14 Tomcat Maverick (and Goose) flew in the first TOP GUN film (or does it?) we did some digging and wrote a piece about what we consider to be one of the stars of the movie (and we’re not talking about Tom Cruise) here.

2021 02 28 23 48 12 348 Top Gun Maverick Official Trailer IN LEGO YouTube
Screenshot captured from featured video

The original Trailer 1 for the film is featured here. Trailer 2 is featured here. And an absolutely hilarious spoof of Trailer 1 (uploaded to YouTube by StSanders) is linked below. Enjoy!

TOP GUN: Maverick Darkstar in LEGO.
Screenshot captured from featured video

F-35A Demo Team ‘Excited’ for 2021 Airshow Season

ATLANTA — The Air Force’s newest stealth fighter will return to air shows across North America this spring demonstrating precision maneuvers and educating the public of its combat capabilities.

The F-35A Lightning II Demonstration Team are rehearsing on the ground and in the air for their first show in May. Pilot Capt. Kristin “BEO” Wolfe will showcase the jet’s handling characteristics and high speed maneuvers.

F-35A to Showcase Top Precision Maneuvers

Capt. “Beo” Wolfe is the Air Force’s only single-ship female squadron commander and pilot. She continues to train to stay combat ready at her home base near Salt Lake City.

201205 F PG806 1118
U.S. Air Force SSgt. Roberto Tejada-Najera of the F-35A Demo Team prepares to launch out Capt. Kristin “BEO” Wolfe for a Heritage Flight performance in December 2020. (U.S.A.F. photo by SSgt. Codie Trimble)

“When I’m flying the demonstration, I’m trying to show people just a small example of what the jet is capable of doing,” Capt. Wolfe discussed on Tuesday. “We designed the routine specifically to showcase the maximum maneuvering capabilities of the F-35.”

The aircraft’s air show performance highlights only a few of its precision maneuvers. Several other capabilities by the F-35 are classified, including a basic surface attack and dropping weapons.

“Our jets come straight off the flight line from the combat-ready squadrons at Hill Air Force Base,” Capt. Wolfe said. “The aircraft we bring to air shows could either have been to or just recently come back from an operation overseas.”

AFPIMS 2021 Schedule 17 Feb v2

The F-35A Demo Team’s first public air show is scheduled for May 30 – 31, near Atlanta. This will be their only show in the southeast.

Other show sites include Washington state, Illinois, Michigan, Alaska, California, and Toronto, Canada.

In addition to performing solo, Capt. Wolfe will also perform a close formation flight with an Air Force warbird. Known as the Heritage Flight, the F-35A will fly alongside an aircraft from yesteryear and possibly fly with a current jet aircraft.

The team’s dedicated crew chief Staff Sgt. Roberto Tejada-Najera oversees the maintenance and inspections on the F-35 aircraft. He is looking forward to the start of the air show season and meeting with guests in attendance.

“I’m not the most outgoing person, but I love getting to talk to the public and explaining to them what it’s like being a maintainer and showing them around the jet,” he said. “I wanted to join the Air Force and be on a demonstration team, so this is kind of my way of paying it forward.”

(Charles A Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

United Grounds 777 Subfleet After Engine Failure

0

United Airlines grounded 24 Boeing 777-200 aircraft today in response to an FAA emergency airworthiness directive that requires immediate inspection of all PW4000 engines. The inspection mandate is in response to yesterday’s catastrophic engine failure aboard United Flight 328 bound to Honolulu, Hawaii from Denver International Airport. That flight made an emergency return to the airport. All 231 passengers onboard were unharmed.

The Pratt & Whitney PW4000 was designed for the Boeing 777. With over 90,000 lbs of thrust, it was one of the largest jet engines ever placed on an airliner when it first entered service. The United jets affected are some of the oldest 777s in their fleet, largely flying domestic trunk routes.

In a statement, United Airlines stated that they are removing the aircraft from their schedule. They will “work closely with regulators to determine any additional steps and expect only a small number of customers to be inconvenienced.

In a parallel move, Japan also grounded all Boeing 777s powered by the PW4000 engine. A check of flight schedules showed that both ANA and Japan Airlines have removed the affected Boeing 777-200s from their schedule.

United 777 Pilots Calmly Landed Jet After Catastrophic Engine Failure

0

United Airlines flight 328 took off this afternoon for Denver bound for Honolulu with 231 passengers and crew onboard. Shortly after takeoff, the right #2 engine failed. It showered debris over Broomfield, Colorado.

Video taken from inside the jet showed the right engine missing its cowling and engine cover. Flames were visible in the video. The jet safely landed a few minutes later. No injuries were reported. News reports showed that the cowling landed in a front yard with engine debris spread over a wide area.

https://twitter.com/michaelagiulia/status/1363241125495136267

The aircraft involved was N772UA. This particular 777-200 was the 5th Boeing 777 off the production line back in 1995. It entered service in September of 1995 just months after United introduced the two-engined long haul jet into the fleet.

Below are relevant tweets with photos posted to twitter along with an ATC recording of the incident.

FHnPow Q
United 328 heavy, a Boeing 777-200 suffered an engine failure over the Denver metro area. Photo by Hayden Smith (@speedbird5280 on Instagram). Used with permission.
etCoawXc
United 328 heavy, a Boeing 777-200 suffered an engine failure over the Denver metro area. Photo by Hayden Smith (@speedbird5280 on Instagram). Used with permission.

Below is the recording of flight 328’s departure and emergency return recorded by LiveATC.net and visualized by VASA Aviation on Youtube. You’ll note in the video that the pilots were tremendously calm throughout the emergency.

We’ll keep this story updated as we learn more.

Not the first United 777 uncontained engine incident

A similar but unrelated incident to another United Airlines 777-200 occurred back in 2018. That incident occurred over the Pacific Ocean in cruise. The #2 engine failed as well. The cause was determined to be metal fatigue on a fan blade. The aircraft landed safely at Honolulu International Airport with no injuries as well.

Close Air Support: It’s All About Serving Others

Lessons learned from an A-10 Pilot

Close Air Support, or CAS as it’s known throughout the military and contractor circles that support it, is defined as “air action by aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces and that require detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of those forces.” Joint Publication 3-09.3 Close Air Support, June 10, 2019, xi.

See the source image
23STS Combat controllers working with an a-10 (source: air force official photo)

So, what does that really mean to those who aren’t knee deep in CAS as a way of life?

CAS means strapping into your airplane, pushing up your sleeves, and moving in close for a knife fight. Sometimes, it means you need to get low and slow and right down in the midst of the fight so you can break out the bad guys from the good guys. Sometimes it means you hang it all on the line because if you don’t someone else is going to die. Sometimes it means you may not make it back because your sacrifice was worth saving another. But every time, ever sortie, and every mission CAS means you think of others before thinking of yourself.

Close Air Support…It’s a Calling for Some Pilots

Back in the Fall of 1997, twenty-eight young Lieutenants and a couple of Captains were days away from completing Euro-NATO Joint Jet Pilot Training (ENJJPT) at Sheppard AFB in Wichita Falls, Texas. It had been a long and demanding year and these young officers from the United States, Germany, Denmark, and the Netherlands were chomping at the bit to receive their aircraft assignments. Most would earn a fighter as Sheppard predominantly tracked pilots towards fighters at the completion of training. A few would earn a bomber, and a couple would remain as ENJJPT instructor cadre for three to four year before progressing on to a follow-on aircraft assignment.

The Europeans knew what they were going to get as they had been tracked for their assignments before starting pilot training. The Danish and Dutch pilots were going to go fly F-16s. Most of the Germans were going to GR-1 Tornados and one was going to go fly a F-4 Phantom. But the Americans had to compete for their assignments. Checkride performance, academic scores, and professional standing were all taken into account to rack and stack the student pilots. The pilot who graduated top of the class got to pick from the list of available aircraft first, the second from the top picked next, and so on and so forth until all 30 pilots knew what they would be flying for the rest of their careers.

Close Air Support is a Choice

The Gulf War was in the distant pass. 9-11 had not occurred and the world was experiencing a stretch of calm. Pilots were frothing at the mouth for the new F-22 Raptor and wanted to dive head first into the Air Superiority mission. The F-15C Eagle and F-15E Strike Eagle were still pretty sexy and the F-16C Fighting Falcon was considered more of a jack-of-all trades fighter.

These 30 young pilots spent hours after flying formation and mastering instrument approaches talking about what fighter they were going to fly. There was a lot of smack talk, some legitimate discussion every once in a while, but mostly a lot of boisterous dreaming.

Some wanted to dogfight. They wanted to scream through the air at 40,000 feet and launch missiles beyond visual range at targets they would never see. These pilots took F-15Cs. Others wanted a mix of mission sets. They wanted to turn and burn with another fighter in a dogfight and then get tasked to drop bombs…they wanted to “do it all”. These pilots usually took an F-16. And then there were the pilots that wanted to play in the mud. They wanted to fly low, fly old school clock-to map-to ground navigation, get shot at, shoot back, and help the grunts on the ground bring pay back to the enemy. They wanted to fly the CAS mission. These pilots selected A-10s and from that day on proudly called themselves Hog drivers.

a 10jim mumaw
Close Air Support: It’s All About Serving Others 23

Hog Drivers Live for Close Air Support

To Hog drivers, CAS is a way of life. They live it, breathe it, eat it, dream about it, and never stop talking about it. Everything at some point finds a way to relate to CAS. It’s what they do and who they are and they’re really good at it.

However, there are other great CAS pilots besides Hog drivers. Marine F/A-18 Super Hornet drivers are exceptional. Why? Because every Marine is an infantryman first and a pilot second. They’ve been schooled in CAS from basic training on and bring that perspective to the fight from the air. So, they take CAS seriously. Army AH-64 Apache pilots are outstanding because they’re right there are the front lines with their brethren in the midst of the fight. AC-130 Gunships own the night in a CAS battle and their aircrew can lay down a pounding within meters of friendly forces. They bring several sensors, two Gatling guns, and a 105mm howitzer to the fight. They’re unbelievably impressive to watch in action.

See the source image
USMC F/A-18D from vmat-101 (source: wikimedia)
See the source image
AH-64 Apaches (source: wordpress.com)
See the source image
ac-130 firing the 105mm howitzer (source: wikimedia)

Regardless, in any given room of Air Force pilots you can always pick out the “CAS guys and gals”. It only takes a few minutes after initial introductions as most of these folks are a bit more reserved than other pilots. They possess a stoic sense of “mission first” in everything they do. They’ve been schooled in Joint Fires doctrine and many have served on the ground with their sister Army or Marine services as Battalion Air Liaison Officers (BALOs) or Joint Terminal Air Controllers (JTACs). So, they speak “grunt” well and usually choose to draw a picture in the dirt with a stick to describe a ground scheme of maneuver over shooting down a bandit with their hands while spinning an exaggerated tale.

Close Air Support = Job Satisfaction

As a CAS pilot, there is nothing more rewarding than knowing you did your job well that day. Because what that really meant is you helped some kid on the battlefield get back home to his or her family. The day wasn’t about you. It wasn’t about putting another notch on your rifle butt or mission mark on the nose of your aircraft. It was about making sure a bad guy was never able to be a bad guy again so your brothers and sisters could live to fight another day.

JTACs wave to A 10 170719 F YM181 010
A-10 Supporting JTACs (SOURCE: Official USAF Photo)

Close Air Support is a Mentality

You’ll find Hog drivers don’t call themselves fighter pilots but instead prefer to be called “Attack Pilots”. There is a difference in their minds and Brig Gen Mike “Johnny Bravo” Drowley does a great job explaining such in his TEDx talks “There Are Some Fates Worse Than Death” presentation. He talks to the empathy Attack Pilots have for those they support and how they personally identify with the Marine Rifleman, Army Infantryman, or Navy SEAL. He talks to how the battlefield soldiers’ survival is more important than the Attack Pilot’s safety. And that in itself, is the identifying force behind CAS.

It is simply all about others…  ATTACK!

AT-802 Fire Boss: Flying The Fire Fighting Crop Duster on Floats

The Birth of the Fire Boss

You have to love ingenuity…especially in aviation. But who would have ever thought taking a crop duster and putting it on floats would end up producing one of the most effective aerial fire-fighting platforms in existence today? How did the AT-802 come about?

Well, John Schwenk, owner of Aero Spray Inc., located in Appleton, Minnesota did back in 2007. He had been operating a small fleet of Single Engine Air Tanker (SEAT) AT-802s for several years in Minnesota and after running the math one day quickly came to the conclusion an AT-802 on floats would be a very cost-efficient and profitable aerial fire-fighting machine if employed in locations close to suitable water sources.

John gathered his Aero Spray team, contacted Wipaire Inc. who had designed and certified their 10000 Amphibious Floats for the AT-802 a few years earlier, and then put together a plan to field the amphibious AT-802 two years later in 2009. And there you have it…the Fire Boss was born.

So…What is it Like to Fly an AT-802 Fire Boss?

Pilots will tell you “once you go float plane, you’ll never want to go back.” Well, in the SEAT world, once you transition from a wheeled SEAT to the Fire Boss most will argue you will never want to go back either. Not only is the Fire Boss a lot of fun to fly, but its mission of direct attack is very different and more challenging than the indirect attack strategy of simply building a line around a wildfire with retardant.

Envision taking off from a small uncontrolled airfield somewhere in the middle of no-where with a set of coordinates, a couple of frequencies, and a map. The mission is to fly as fast as you can direct to the fire, find a scoopable lake or river enroute, grab a load of water, and then proceed direct to the fire with load after load after load for the next three and a half hours. Hopefully the water source is close enough so you can fly two- or three-minute scooping/dropping circuits which means you’ll do that 20 to 30 times before needing to head back for fuel. Chances are you’re scooping on a mountain lake which means the density altitude is fairly high and your scoop site is surrounded my hazardous terrain.

Birds of a feather flock together

You’re also most likely flying as a flight of two, three, four, or even eight Fire Bosses which means there is close formation flying, detailed flight tactics, and congested airspace over the fire. There is probably smoke…a lot of smoke…so the visibility is low making it difficult to keep track of each other as well as the helicopters, see the terrain, avoid the towers and wires, and even find your way back to the fire at times

fireboss2
Fire Boss 241 (SOURCE: MIKE YOUNG)

Scooping the AT-802…Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride

As stated earlier, once you go float plane you’ll never want to go back. Why? Because it is so much fun. The challenge of taking an airplane, flying with lots of stick and rudder, assessing the water and wind conditions, making every touchdown a spot landing on a lake, river, or even the ocean is unbelievably rewarding and satisfying. No two water landings are ever the same and each is extremely memorable for its own reasons.

And then there is scooping on top of that. Scooping is a blast. It takes everything described above and melds that with taking on a load of 500–800-gallon (4,165 – 6,664 pounds) load of water all while skimming across the water at 60 knots.

The First Scoop in the AT-802 Fire Boss

The first scoop in a Fire Boss is harrowing, wild, and usually a bit violent. The actual scoops are two three-inch pipes that hydraulically extend into the water from the bottom of each pontoon. If power, aircraft pitch, and water speed is not managed properly, the initial deployment feels like you’ve hit a brick wall. The drag is immense causing the nose of the aircraft to pitch aggressively forward. It takes 10-20 scoop attempts to finally get the hang of managing the first scoop induced porpoise with a smooth and steady power increase while gently pumping the stick aft in counter-harmony with nose porpoising. It is truly an art and all Fire Boss pilot eventually develop their own individual technique

How it Works: The Fire Boss scooping mechanism – YouTube

So, there you are…all four gear are up with blue cockpit indications and the prop pitch is set to 1700 RPM. The scoops have been cycled with no lingering asymmetric warning light which tells you if a scoop is stuck down. If it is, the aircraft will take a hard left or right on touchdown depending on which scoop is extended. The ignition has been set to continuous as a “just in case” mitigation measure and the flaps are set to 20 degrees for max post scoop lift. Lastly the rudder trim has been pre-loaded heavy right in preparation for the tremendous pedal forces that will occur once water starts pumping into the hopper during the upcoming scoop. Final approach airspeed is captured at 75 knots followed by one last pre-scoop checklist ramble to ensure nothing traumatic will occur on the water.

Landing Checklist Complete

Touch down! The stick is checked back into the lap while throttling up a bit to dampen aircraft porpoise. The hopper fills quickly…usually within 20-30 seconds. A brief scan ahead is accomplished to ensure the remaining water lane is clear and then a few seconds later scooping is complete. The power comes up to max available torque followed by a sharp but controlled pull on the stick aft and right to rock the right float out of the water. Once safely airborne it is now a demanding exercise in airspeed management while gingerly climbing away from the water enroute to the fire.

Putting Out Fires in the AT-802

Scoop to fire circuits can be fast and furious. If the water source is nearby you can be on the water to over the fire about every three minutes. There is also a lot to consider prior to the first bomb run which in reality can be minutes after climbing away from the water low and slow.Are there any hazards – snags, power lines, or ridges hidden in the shadows between enroute from scoop to the fire? Where is the helicopter’s dip site? Is it a factor or will their dip to fire route conflict with the Fire Boss run-in line? What is the bomb run objective – to cut off the head of the fire, attack a flank, tie into a dozer line, or spike the load in on a spot fire as it erupts from stray embers?

Regardless, airspeed and altitude control are essential to ensure that once released, the water column falls properly with the correct density to smother the fire.

A-T 802 WATER BOMBERS IN ACTION AKA THE FIRE BOSS’s – YouTube

Approaching the Fire in the mighty AT-802

AT-802 Fire Bosses drop at approximately 80 feet above the terrain and usually provide best effects when the final approach airspeed is hovering at 105 knots. That means 20-degree flaps are rolled to provide max lift while helping to slow the aircraft. If the slope downhill on final is steeper than 30 degrees, then maximum flap setting of 30 degrees is used to keep the airspeed from running away from you. Anything above 120 knots will cause the aircraft to pitch up violently as soon as the load is let loose which can be very disorienting and possible deadly if the pilot doesn’t react immediately to right the aircraft and bring her back to straight and level. Final approach. Airspeed-checks. Attitude-checks.

The bombing computer has been set for proper gallons per square foot and total amount to be dropped. The line looks good. Confirmation with the Air Attack or Lead Plane that all ground fire fighters are clear of the line and it’s safe to drop has occurred. Target aimpoint is off the nose. You may need to offset a wingspan or two into the wind to counter the wind drift on the falling water column. The target runs under the nose and just as it passes beneath an imaginary line drawn between the engine smoke stacks – pickle! Load away!

Max allowable torque is selected as the aircraft is steered to the briefed exit. Without even thinking about it, the left-hand slides back from the throttle to gently nudge the flaps up in small 5-degree increments as the aircraft climbs out 4,000-6,500 pounds lighter enroute back to the scoop site to do it all again!

Determined Engineer Showed NASA How to Land on the Moon

0

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — In the months leading up to America’s first manned space flight, NASA leaders met for a round table discussion of how to land a man on the moon.

In February 1961, members of the Space Task Group met in Washington, D.C. with engineers to discuss solutions. The group was headed by Robert Gilruth and lead Mercury spacecraft designer Maxime Faget. Wernher von Braun, the father of American rocketry, also attended the meeting.

As the discussion progressed past the midway point, an unknown engineer stood up in the smoke-filled room. He then explained his theory for how America should send astronauts to the moon.

A NASA Engineer’s Cost Efficient, Time Saving Plan For Moon Landing

NASA Langley Research Center engineer John C. Houbolt began to explain an unheard of theory known as Lunar Orbit Rendezvous. His plan would send two spacecraft into lunar orbit, land one on the Moon, and later have the two redock and return to Earth.

3 john c. houbolt gpn 2000 001274b
NASA engineer John C. Houbolt explains his Lunar Orbit Rendezvous plan in 1961. (NASA)

Houbolt served as Chief of the Theoretical Mechanics Division at Langley, and now he was up to bat in the biggest game of his life.

Lunar Orbit Rendezvous (LOR) was an unknown theory Houbolt had designed five months earlier. He was one of six members of a committee to study problems associated with rendezvous while constructing a space station platform.

In August 1960, the committee began associating the rendezvous of a space station with the rendezvous and landing on the moon. Houbolt used the blackboard to chalk out several designs involving rendezvous for a flight to the moon.

The practical engineer loved the simplest, most cost-efficient method—LOR. As Houbolt spoke of his LOR theory to von Braun and the Space Task Group, it began to fall on deaf ears.

Shouts of “misleading information” from Faget and a head-shaking “no” from von Braun concluded the then 41-year-old engineer’s address to his peers.

Lunar landing flight techniques for moon landing

Von Braun and several others agreed with a plan known as Earth Orbit Rendezvous, which would see two Saturn rockets launch. One would carry a spacecraft and the other a fuel supply craft into Earth orbit.

The pair would then rendezvous. The Apollo craft would travel to the moon, land, and return as a single craft. Another plan that was being accepted was the direct ascent to the moon.

“The plan was to send a vehicle the size of Atlas to the moon with absolutely zero help and land it backwards,” Houbolt told NASA’s Langley years later, “It can not be done.”

A large rocket, mightier than the Saturn 5, would launch an Apollo craft to the moon. Apollo would then separate in lunar orbit from the rocket and land.

Several weeks after President Kennedy challenged America to land a man on the moon before 1970, NASA administrator James Webb let it be known that NASA was steering Apollo as an EOR mission to the moon, with the direct ascent as a backup choice for landing.

The LOR plan was swept under the rug by a few key NASA managers throughout 1961, except for Max Faget. He began to realize LRO as a better option. Houbolt continued to lobby for his proposal.

Houbolt wrote two letters to NASA associate administrator Robert Seamans asking for support of his plan. By Thanksgiving of 1961, Gilruth and Langley, along with NASA headquarters, approved it as a time—and money-saving option.

A few months later, Von Braun and Marshall approved Houbolt’s idea. Plans were drawn up to build a secondary spacecraft that would land on the moon—the lunar excursion module.

Houbolt single-handedly saved American taxpayers billions of dollars in fuel and rocket costs. He also trimmed the time needed to build the multiple rockets required by EOR by two years.

Kennedy’s challenge survived his presidency. Not just one, but two crewed lunar landings occurred during 1969.

History Also Supported Houbolt’s Plan

Little did Houbolt know that one year earlier, engineers at the Vought Astronautics Division near Dallas discussed their LOR theory with NASA. NASA had also ignored Vought’s engineers.

A few years later, Houbolt learned of Russian mechanic Yuri Kondratyuk, who formulated ideas related to space flight and LOR. Kondratyuk’s designs and notes were made while he was a soldier during World War I. They never reached Russian scientists following the Second World War.

As Houbolt watched Apollo 9 lift off in 1969 with the first lunar module, he felt emotion. His thoughts raced through his own journey and his contribution to America’s space flight.

AS11 44 6581HR
The Apollo 11 lunar module “Eagle” descends to the Moon’s surface with two astronauts aboard. (NASA)

Two months later, the now-former NASA engineer sat in the visitors’ section of Houston’s Mission Control. Apollo 11 lunar module Eagle had just left lunar orbit to perform the first landing by Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin.

“When the landing took place and the touchdown was made, all of us stood up and started clapping,” Houbolt recalled during a NASA interview. “But at the same time, we were shh, shh, because we didn’t want to miss a fraction of a second of history being made.”

Houbolt added, “Von Braun sat in front of me, and he made the OK sign and said, ‘Thank you, John.’ That was one of the biggest rewards I’ve ever had.”

(Charles A. Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

WATCH: A KC-130F Hercules Operates From an Aircraft Carrier Flight Deck

0

You Don’t See This Every Day!

Back in 1963, a Lockheed KC-130F Hercules tanker conducted a series of test landings and takeoffs from the deck of the USS Forrestal (CVA-59).  The crew made 29 touch-and-go landings, 21 full-stop landings (Look Ma- No Hook!), and 21 unassisted takeoffs (deck-run takeoffs without catapult assist) while weighing from 85,000 pounds all the way up to 121,000 pounds.

The only modifications made to the airlifter were to the nose landing gear bay, removal of the underwing refueling pods, and beefed-up anti-lock brakes. Even though operating Herks from carrier decks proved to be impractical and somewhat dangerous, the fact that the mighty Herk could even accomplish such a feat (multiple times) is a testament to the ruggedness of the C-130.

The Incredible Versatile Herk

wMWbP1NP Y URBwEjilR5T76Tl xhJxjY9kryhvPRMI
WATCH: A KC-130F Hercules Operates From an Aircraft Carrier Flight Deck 30

Herks have flown into hurricanes and typhoons to gather storm data, controlled all manner of aerial drones, flown airborne early warning and control, electronic eavesdropping, and jamming missions, and inserted and supported personnel behind borders and enemy lines by flying we-were-never-there, nap-of-the-earth ingress and egress routes.

Sign up to receive a weekly summary of Avgeekery’s stories.

C-130s do aerial firefighting, recover spy satellites and their “take”- there are even Hercules tankers that can be converted to gunships on the spot and back again after mission completion. C-130s have been flying for the United States Air Force, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard for more than 60 years and they’re still going strong.

tumblr nco4fnoVUO1txx6x7o4 1280
WATCH: A KC-130F Hercules Operates From an Aircraft Carrier Flight Deck 31

Want to read more about the C-130?