Home Blog Page 180

Are You Ready For Your Next Flight?

Editor’s Note:  Whether you fly a Cessna 172 or an F-16, the preflight is an essential part of a safe and successful flight.  As part of a series, retired F-16 pilot Nate “Buster” Jaros will share his perspective on how he prepared for a flight.


What are some things people prepare for? Some people prepare for school. They do their homework, they read the required passages, and they get ready for their classes. They sharpen their pencils too. Some people prepare for trips also. They carefully pack important items and take special care to pick out the right clothes they will need on their trip. Don’t forget the bathing suit!Cessna172cockpit

People prepare. We have to, it’s who we are and how we operate. We all think through what might happen in the future, based on past experience and prepare for all possible contingencies, or at least the most possible and likely ones. That’s how you know to pack an umbrella if traveling to London, right?

How do you prepare for a flight in your General Aviation airplane? What is it that you do, based on what might happen in the future to prepare yourself and your aircraft to take to the skies? In aviation, this concept of preparation is commonly called the preflight.

There are many techniques and countless pages written on the unexceptional preflight. I’d say that no one particular set of instructions or concepts is right or wrong, or more correct than the others. They all have their merits, unless you subscribe to the “kick the tires, lights the fires” philosophy, then in that case you’re just flat out wrong. I hope you’re a better, safer and more contentious pilot than that. But you must prepare to go fly, this is life and death we’re talking about here.

I’m not going to waste your time by listing out hundreds of preflight items that you have heard before. Things like ‘check the flap travel’ or ‘feel for nicks on the prop leading edges.’ No. I’m not going to insult your intelligence. I am assuming that you are already doing the things you were taught and what your POH says you should be checking. I am assuming that you are preflighting your own self and your aircraft in a typical fashion.

Instead, we’re going to talk about the things that maybe you haven’t heard before, and some techniques that maybe you didn’t know. Let’s see what we can uncover.

When does the preflight of your aircraft start? Well for me it begins the instant I lay eyes on my plane. Whether it was an F-16 I was flying that day, or my humble Bonanza, when I first see the plane, I begin. I look at what is around the plane. Are there benches, light stands, boxes or other impediments? What about drips or leaks? Any of those under the plane? Are the struts and/or tires low? Basic stuff right? Being a detective here, at this point in your preflight, before you even get to the plane can tell you a lot about what has happened since it last flew and has been sitting on the ground. Use this detective concept and even without touching the aircraft see what information about its condition you can glean.

image

I once found an oxygen fill port door open on an F-16, not a typical occurrence, but I spotted it easily and with a glance. I asked my crew chief what was up, and sure enough…no oxygen had been serviced from the previous flight. Look for those differences. The little things. It can be that easy. And take note of what stands out as you approach the airplane.

Additionally, you should know what things can kill you. Or really ruin your day. I spend a little extra time on the gear and brakes, the fuel, as well as the flight controls and engine. I spend a little less time counting rivets, or nuts on a panel, things like that. What stuff is really going to hurt you or the plane? Look for that. I might check the lights and flaps, but I can land my Bonanza without lights and flaps…so those items are lower on the priority list. I’m not advocating carelessness, but rather knowing the critical systems and how they operate, and what they should look like during a preflight. What items can bite you?

1024px-thumbnailDo I spend a lot of time looking in the engine tail-pipe of the F-16, no. I could look in there all day and not know that it was about to fail, or be a good engine. What I look at is the various sensors and indicators on and around the engine and jet that indicate problems. I also note at how it starts and what numbers and operational limits are exceeded, if at all. How does it ‘feel’ and ‘sound’ when it lights off? Is this a normal start up sequence, or not? What is my engine trying to tell me when a needle fluctuates abnormally on startup? Get the idea?

I few pilots sometimes report that they heard a funny noise on start-up, or during gear retraction. Guess what? Something is amiss and your plane is “talking to you.” Quite often those are the issues that can cause failures later. Do you have the knowledge and patience to listen?

There is another concept that I adhere to. It’s called the three-strike rule. It was passed down to me by my Air Force instructors. Basically, if you have three strikes before a flight, something is wrong and it’s time to stop and re-evaluate the purpose of the sortie at hand. Or even cancel the flight. This technique is a little more intangible, but I find a lot of experienced pilots follow this rule, or something similar.

The ‘three strike rule’ goes something like this. Maybe during planning you determine the weather on the route or destination is pretty bad, doable, but bad. That is strike one. That is one thing already telling you that something is different. Then you do your walk around and slice your finger on a sharp part of the airplane. You can bandage it up and proceed, it’s not that bad. Strike two. Then after startup, tower can’t find your flight plan in the system. Maybe it’s because you forgot to file one! (This has never happened to me). Strike three.

preflightThe three strikes can be anything that you deem as significant. Dropping a pencil or misplacing your keys may not be strikes. However, forgetting things, being clumsy, and some acts of God might all be significant enough to warrant a pause, or even a mission cancel. I know it’s a bit superstitious, but when the strikes start to pile up, it’s time to listen.

Lastly, in the USAF we are taught to do one last thing after the preflight “walk around” checks and just before hopping in the cockpit. Go out in front of your aircraft, maybe 30-50 feet off the nose…and just look at it. Yep just look at it. You’d be surprised how many weird or wrong things you can find. Ever hear of someone taking off with the pitot covers on, or cranking the engine with a tow bar still attached to the nose wheel, or trying to taxi with the chocks still in? Yep, it happens. If you take the time to go out front and just look at the plane, nothing more, you will be surprised on what you can find, and what you might catch. Give it a try.

These preflight techniques are pretty simple, but they can save your bacon someday, just as much as checking weather, or counting bolts on an aileron, or testing the tire pressures. In my mind they all have equal importance in helping any pilot prepare for his or her flight.

Good luck, be prepared and fly safe!

A Bad Luck Crash and a Complex Design Doomed the XB-70 Bomber

3

The Mach 3+ Valkyrie Was One of Those Programs That Outran Available Technology

The ability to travel Mach 3 is a difficult feat. At those speeds, the aircraft must disperse the heat that builds up on the skin. Aircraft at that speed also have to deal with shifting CG at supersonic speeds, along with stability and compressibility challenges. With all those challenges in mind, it’s even more amazing that large air breathing bombers, like the XB-70, as well as reconnaissance and transport jets flew supersonic in the 1960s.

North American XB 70 on ramp ECN 1814
XB-70 at Edwards AFB. Image via USAF

Uniquely Powerful Engines for a Unique Aircraft

Powered by 6 General Electric YJ-93-3 afterburning turbojet engines putting out a combined 119.000 pounds of thrust (172,000 horses in afterburner), the XB-70 Valkyrie was a beast. The bomber flew higher than 60,000 thousand feet regularly and with the ability to maintain greater than Mach 2.5 throughout the whole duration of the flight. The aircraft was expected to be one the most lethal assets since the enemy could not fly either as fast or as high. At Mach 2.5+, it would be very difficult to shoot down such a speedy jet.

North American XB 70A with Convair B 58A chase aircraft
North American XB-70A Valkyrie with Convair TB-58A chase aircraft. Note singed paint from sustained supersonic speeds. Image via USAF

Another North American Aviation Creation

Designed for the United States Air Force(USAF) by North American Aviation, the XB-70 was designed to be the next generation bomber. Made of mostly stainless steel and boasting a unique delta wing and canard surface design, the aircraft was both advanced and a potential game changer during the Cold War.

XB-70 in flight.
XB-70A. Image via USAF

Bad Luck and Trouble

Unfortunately, the XB-70 never reached its full potential. The jet faced a number of teething problems. One was its sheer size. The jet was also very complex with challenging fuel and flight control systems. Those problems reached a crescendo when one test vehicle was lost to bad luck during a mid-air collision with an F-104 Starfighter chase plane that occurred during a photo flight. With high operating costs and a limited mission, the project was abandoned in 1969. America would not have another supersonic bomber until the B-1 program was revived in the early 1980s. There is currently one XB-70 on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force.

XB-70 on the runway.
XB-70 at the USAF Museum in Dayton. Image via USAF

This video report about the XB-70 test program was uploaded to YouTube by PeriscopeFilm. Enjoy.

[youtube id=”qzAWfFJqaQc” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Sonic Boom! The Last USAF F-4s Went Out With A Bang!

0

Retiring QF-4s performed supersonic pass during last flight at Holloman.

The last US Air Force QF-4s took to the skies on December 21, 2016.  Those flights capped a full 58 years of F-4 Phantoms gracing the skies of the United States.  Avgeeks from all over the country gathered to watch and photograph an active F-4 flying one more time.

Those gathered got a bonus. They didn’t just hear the roar of the mighty General Electric J79 engines.  They also heard the mighty F-4 Phantom power past Mach 1 as the tell tale sonic booms were heard by everyone present.  No damage was reported.

Here’s a great video of the happening posted by Skyes9.

[youtube id=”gegJ1821jHA” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

 

 

The Flying Boat Mothership Was An Attempt To Fly Passengers and Mail Across The Atlantic

0

The Shorts-Mayo Combination was an attempt to cross the Atlantic with a useful load.

A recent article on “Mother Ships” prompted recollection of a much earlier pairing of two aircraft—a Shorts Empire Class flying boat and a smaller Shorts four-engine float plane.

In the 1930s, the challenge was to design an airplane that could make the Atlantic Crossing carrying revenue generating passengers or mail. The Shorts Empire Class flying boats, with a crew of five, could carry up to 18 passengers and more than 4,000 pounds of cargo and mail, and it was a profitable aircraft on the European side of the Atlantic. To make the crossing from Great Britain to North America, however, passengers and cargo had to be replaced with fuel.

Aircraft engineers knew that an airplane could maintain flight at greater weights than it could take off with. Major Robert H. Mayo, Technical General Manager at Imperial Airways proposed the Shorts-Mayo Composite with a smaller float plane, that carried 1000 pounds of mail, mounted on top of a modified version Shorts Empire class flying boat. The larger flying boat would lift the float plane to its cruising altitude, they would separate, and Mercury would proceed to North America.

The pair of aircraft consisted of a Shorts S.21 Empire Class flying boat, the “Maia,” fitted with a structure that supported the smaller Shorts S.20 “Mercury” float plane on top. The bottom of the fuselage/hull of the redesigned flying boat had a flared bottom making it wider than the rest of the fuselage. This provided more planing surface under the hull, necessary for the greater takeoff weight. Other design changes included larger control surfaces, a larger wing with the engines mounted farther from the hull to make room for Mercury’s floats.

Mercury was a smaller aircraft, crewed by a single pilot and a navigator. During takeoff, Mercury’s flight controls were locked in a neutral position. Only the trim tabs were operational. Mercury was attached to Maia at three points. The attaching mechanism allowed some movement so that the pitch of the float plane could be adjusted in flight. Three lights in the cockpit indicated when Mercury was in fore-to-aft balance.mm_short_mayo_composite_scan

Upon reaching Mercury’s separation altitude, the pilots first released two of the three attachments. The third attachment released automatically at 3000 pounds of force. When released, Mercury automatically climbed up and away and Maia dropped, providing safe separation.

The first flight test was made in February 1938, completing a successful separation. Additional tests were conducted over the next several months. The first operational flight with passengers in Maia and mail in Mercury was flown in July 1938. After separation, Mercury continued west to North America—a flight that took more than 20 hours. Meanwhile, Maia turned east toward Europe with 10 passengers and luggage.

This, the only Shorts-Mayo Composite built, continued to operate into December 1938. During this time, the Mayo Composite also launched Mercury on flights to Alexandria, Egypt and South Africa. By the end of 1938 longer range flying boats had been developed with more powerful engines and higher payloads, making the combination unnecessary.

The fates of both aircraft were determined by World War two. Maia was destroyed 1941 in a German bombing raid at her mooring in Poole Harbour, while Mercury was used as a reconnaissance aircraft. It was soon replaced by newer aircraft, after which it returned to Shorts factory where it was broken up to recycle the aluminum needed for the war effort.

[youtube id=”bYtazEBQ1K8″ width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Resources:

A Century of Flight, Ray Bonds, Salamander Books Ltd, 2003

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bYtazEBQ1K8

 

A Guy Tries To Buy a Harrier Jet With Pepsi Points. Then Sues Pepsi For The Jet.

0

Seven million points is quite alot of soda to consume.  That never phased John Leonard.  He was determined to get a free Harrier jet.

The Harrier Jet first devolved in the 1960’s as a joint project between the United States and the United Kingdom. The Harrier was later redesigned and produced by McDonnell Douglas. It had its faults but it brought about a new era of aviation with the ability to be a vertical takeoff and landing fighter jet. A Rolls Royce engine, the ability to take off vertically, the ability to carry several thousand pounds, and advanced equipment meant the jet fit a niche role in each nation’s defense. The jet isn’t cheap though. At $30M a copy, Harriers are national assets, definitely not a prize giveaway for a soda company…wait, what? Check this story.

Back in the late 90s, Pepsi positioned itself as the ‘un-cola’. The cool, hip soda company tp counter the ‘lame’, stodgy, old-people Coca-Cola company. As part of their advertising campaign, Pepsi was touting a Harrier Jet in a commercial advertisement for their “Pepsi Points” program. It was shown that one could acquire the aircraft for 7 million points. That’s quite alot of soda to consume.  Here’s the commercial:

[youtube id=”ZdackF2H7Qc” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Enter John Leonard and your daily dose of aircraft humor. After some quick thinking and a little math, Leonard had intended to get himself a real Harrier jet. Unfortunately, it didn’t quite go as planned. Even after he got the points, Pepsi didn’t pay up. Leonard even took Pepsico to court. He lost the case. It certainly does make for a good story and a laugh today though. Take a look at the video and see how John Leonard attempted to acquire the aircraft. If only it could be that easy… and cheap.

[youtube id=”h7XliS0DYRo” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

[shopify embed_type=”product” shop=”custom-model-planes.myshopify.com” product_handle=”av-8b-harrier-1-46-scale-mahogany-model” show=”all”][shopify embed_type=”product” shop=”custom-model-planes.myshopify.com” product_handle=”mcdonnell-douglas-av-8b-harrier-ii-usmc-1-48-scale-model” show=”all”]

This Fighter Instructor Is Crazy (And We Love It!)

0

“Go Get Him! Kill him!”Like a rallying cry in Gladiator, this IFF (Introduction to Fighter Fundamentals) instructor emphasizes the importance of the kill instinct for fighter pilots.

There is no doubt that our world has become much more politically correct over the past few years. There are admittedly some good things that have come of it.  No one is a fan of blatant discrimination or sexism.  But many will say that the PC culture has gone too far.  Many lament the loss of fighter pilot culture as the squadron bar is renamed ‘the heritage room’. Posting a picture of a pretty girl on your desk could get you red dotted these days. Many in the Air Force forget that the goal is to be a lethal force–ready to make the enemy die for his country.

That’s why we love this video.  It’s good, ole’ school fighter pilot instruction right there.  You have an IP who is sceaming at his student to kill the other guy during a mock dog fight.  The student probably isn’t sure if the IP is joking or serious.  Odds are he’s stressed and anxious and having the time of his life too!  You know that the instructor has made a lasting impression though. If he is ever in that situation in real combat, the ghost of the IP’s voice will surely be reverberating in his head as he lines up for the kill.

IFF is a required program for newly graduated pilots from Air Force Undergraduate Pilot Training.  During the IFF program, pilots will learn about BFM (Basic Fighter Maneuvers) and build situational awareness for flying in a tactical environment (where the bad guy wants to kill you). They’ll fly it in an AT-38C. Passing this program is a requirement to continue onto a fighter training program in an actual fighter jet.

Today, we salute you Mr. Old-school IP.  You make the Air Force a slightly more fun place.

[youtube id=”JQORXWmGMGk” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

[shopify embed_type=”product” shop=”custom-model-planes.myshopify.com” product_handle=”t-38-talon-customized-model-airplane” show=”all”]

Santa’s Getting a Checkride This Year

0

“You better watch out.  You better not cry.” His experimental craft and isolated North Pole location won’t prevent Santa from getting a ramp check.

Santa has a big job to do tonight.  He has to do what is seemingly impossible.  That is to deliver Christmas gifts to millions of toys to good little boys and girls all around the world in just one night.  But Santa’s big mission can’t be a reason to rush.  Safety is first.  And Santa’s not the type of guy that would put anyone’s life at risk just to cut a few corners and shave off a couple of minutes on his schedule.

As pilot in command, Santa has to be ready for the unexpected.  Even a no-notice checkride by the feds.  While spot checks might make a lesser pilot squirm, Santa is no newbie.  He’s a pro.  Like the airline pilots flying you to grandma’s this year, Santa has years of professional experience flying his sleigh. With deft precision, Santa does his walk-around, checks his performance calculations, and even is ready for the..ehem, unexpected.

Avgeekery is wishing you a joyous holiday season and a very Merry Christmas.  We thank you for being loyal readers of our blog.  Our site is a team of aviation professionals that volunteer their time to make this project a reality.  We love sharing our love of aviation and our expertise in this field with you on a regular basis.  Here’s to an amazing 2017!

[youtube id=”50vE47DGEy4″ width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Longest Flight With No Alternate Airports Requires Perfect Fuel Calculations

0

ETOPS_diagram

Making sure the fuel supplies are more than adequate is crucial when flying the longest route in the world with no alternate landing site.

Say you’re driving on an Interstate, probably somewhere in the Western United States where there are long stretches of highway and nothing else.

You notice the fuel warning light come on and you wonder where and how far to the nearest gas station. As you worry about running out of fuel, one thing you know – you’re safe on the ground, even if the engine coughs to death after exhausting the final fumes.

Now transfer the low fuel scenario to an airplane flying from the West Coast to Hawaii. That’s the longest stretch – nearly 2,500 miles – for a plane with no alternate landing options. Nothing but the blue sky above and the bluer Pacific below.

Even with commercial airlines moving to twin-engine aircraft, flying extended distances such has the mainland to Hawaii remains safe. Aviation rules call for aircraft and flights to be ready for emergencies if one of the engines becomes disabled. Running out of fuel with nothing but water for 360 degrees is not acceptable.

In April this year, a United Airlines flight bound for Honolulu from San Francisco had to pull a U-turn two hours into the flight. Stronger than expected headwinds influenced the pilots to make an overly cautious – and smart – decision to not risk a disaster.

“When the headwinds are greater than what were expected, and are going to be sustained for four or five hours of flight, you’re simply not going to be able to land with your legal minimum of fuel,” ABC aviation expert John Nance said. “It doesn’t mean you’re going to run out, but it means you’re not going to be legal. That’s when you have to turn around.”

Safety rules require commercial flights to have enough fuel to reach the intended destination, hold for 30 minutes and then have another 45 minutes of fuel to land at alternate airport. (If you’ve been on a flight diverted from your original destination, you know the drill.)

In 1989, a Trans World Airlines jumbo jet developed a fuel leak on a flight to Hawaii. The leak was discovered when it was too late to turn back. Instead of landing in Honolulu, the plane made it safely to the closest airport – Hilo International Airport on the island of Hawaii. The plane reportedly had four minutes of fuel remaining when its wheels hit the tarmac.

Check out this historical account of the harrowing and heroic early days of attempts to fly from the West Coast to Hawaii.

 

The F-101 Could’ve Been Legendary But It Had One Fatal Flaw

0

The F101 “Voodoo” was a lean mean supersonic jetfighter machine with a nasty pitch-up problem.

Designed by McDonnell in the 1950’s , the F-101 was used by the United States Airforce and the Canadian Royal Air Force. The F-101 saw many unique roles in its 20+ year career. Originally designed to be a fighter-bomber, the aircraft quickly moved on into reconnaissance and continued to serve as a “utility infielder” of sorts with interception duties and a training role. Unfortunately, despite some of its advanced capabilities and its speed (for the time), there was a nasty little aerodynamic issue which caused the aircraft had a serious “pitch-up” problem that while improved, was never fully fixed.

Pitch-up: What is it?

aoapitchup
The F-101 (f101) had a terrible pitch up problem.

Pitch-up is a type of aggravated stall that commonly occurs in aircraft of this wing type. An aircraft can stall at any time if the AOA is exceeded.  In this case though, pitchup could occur and cause stability issues that actually would lead to a stall. The pitch-up was caused by downwash on the stabilizer during high AOA that causes both a pitch up from the downward force and a reduction in the effectiveness of the stabilizer itself.  Essentially, the jet would become unstable.

The pitch-up tendency was actual double wammy against stable flight. If uncorrected, this issue could cause departure from controlled flight. Luckily, the Air Force was aware of these problems and created training videos concerning what needed to be done to correct the issue mid-flight. This video was put together to train pilots how to avoid the envelope where pitch-up was most likely to occur.

Time Leads to Better Understanding of F-101 Characteristics

Now it’s easy to look back on these early training videos and think how boring it must have been to watch them.  But put yourself in the position of the crew for a moment. Here you were about to fly one of the most advanced fighters of the day and you were being told that if you exceed seemingly normal AOA’s, you could depart controlled flight and not be able to recover.  It would make me pay attention. That’s for sure!

The F-101 flew with the RCAF and the US Air National Guard until 1982.  Canada flew their jet until the F-18 replaced it in the late 1980s.

#AncientAirlines: New York Air Had Attitude, Grew Quickly, Then Folded

The little airline had attitude but it never really gained enough altitude to survive the turbulent era of the late ’80s.

#AncientAirlines is our new series dedicated to highlighting some of the outstanding, unique, and odd airlines they flew in the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.  Look for a new airline profiled every week!

New York Air began in 1980 and was based out of LaGuardia International. New York Air was created as an offshoot of Texas Air designed to be competitive with the few airlines based out of the area by offering frequent and cheap flights in the area. New York air was a small airline with only a few destinations and a small fleet but had a loyal following.

At the time, the New York City market actually suffered from a lack of low fares. Therefore, New York Air’s formula of low fares and friendly service caught on quickly.  They had low walk up fares (important at the time because flights could only be booked by a travel agent or over the phone).  New York Air also had free drinks and assigned seats.  The airline even had special snack bags called “The Flying Nosh”.  They were handed out in flight and were reusable.

The airline operated the mighty Douglas DC 9, a few McDonnell Douglas MD-82s, and 737-300s. The aircraft were painted bright red and had a clever apple painted on the side as a shout out to the “Big Apple.” You couldn’t help but think of the gaudy Big Apple at Shea Stadium when you saw that tail.

At their height, New York Air employed over 2,000 people and operated a smaller operation known as New York Air Connection, offering connecting service on smaller aircraft to northern New York State. However, in 1987 after their creator Texas Air agreed to a merger with Continental, New York Air ceased to exist along as an independent airline as their cleverly painted aircraft became adorned with ‘meatballs’ on the tail.

[youtube id=”SiV6Uvh4C6c” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Whistling Death: F4U Corsair Is Proof You Can Recover From Setbacks

0

If You Fail at First, Try, Try Again. – F4U Corsair

The F4U Corsair was a beefy, powerful fighter that played a significant role in both WWII and the Korean War. The original intent for the aircraft was that it would be used by the United States Navy as a carrier aircraft. Unfortunately, that vision was never realized due to several different issues that plagued the aircraft. The issues were significant and affected a number of aspects of the aircraft. Issues with the landing gear, stability, drag, and precision control on approaches all plagued what was supposed to be an amazing carrier fighter. The aircraft performed so poorly that the Navy could not utilize it. The project was almost canceled but the Corsair received a new chance at life with the Marine Corps who decided to make use of them as ground deployed aircraft.

With one of the largest Pratt & Whitney engines available at the time and a rather large prop, the Corsair did prove to be a useful addition to the Marines. Over time, the issues with the Corsair were corrected. The Navy eventually adopted the aircraft, the Royal Navy, and the New Zealand Royal Air Force followed.  The fighter evolved into an indispensable tool for both the Navy and the Marines.  The aircraft ended the war with an impressive 11:1 kill ratio.  Proof that early setbacks in life, war, and airplane design can be overcome.

This documentary-style video gives a unique look at those who flew the Corsair and the incredible versatility of this classic aircraft. There are still several actively flying F4U-1s around the United States.

[youtube id=”MQCBJOVTzLY” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Horrific Crash That Made Your Airline Flight Safer

0

The Cali, Colombia Crash Resulted in Three Aviation Safety Improvements That Keep You Safer in the Air Today.

Any airplane crash is a tragedy, but in the investigation following a crash, it is always hoped that something can be learned which will aid in the prevention of a future crash. Commercial aviation is now one of the safest modes of transportation available, but it has only become this way through dogged investigation of aircraft accidents and the application of lessons learned. Such was the case of American 965.

crash_site_1

On December 20, 1995, American 965, a 757-200, crashed in the mountains of Colombia while enroute to Cali. 151 passengers and eight crew were killed while five passengers survived the impact. The investigation into the crash concluded that the primary cause was a navigational error made by the flight crew resulting in terrain impact.

There were, however, some unique aspects of this accident which highlighted contributing factors. One of these was found to be several errors in the aircraft’s navigational computer database which led the crew astray.  Also unique to this accident investigation was the method in which investigators were able to reconstruct the events which led to the crash. As it happened, one of the 757’s flight navigation computers was found in the wreckage with its internal battery and volatile memory still intact.

This allowed investigators to reconstruct electronically what the aircrew saw as they were descending through the mountainous terrain that night in Colombia. This finding revealed the true cause of the errors that were made by the flight crew which had until then eluded investigators. And this, in turn, directed investigators to the errors in the onboard database.

Increasing reliance on automation meant that aircrews were becoming more dependent on onboard electronic systems used for navigation rather than on the printed paper charts and radio beacons which had been the mainstay of airborne navigation since the dawn of aviation. Uncritical trust in this system, however, turned out to be deadly.

The aftermath of this crash resulted in new safety systems that are now installed on virtually all commercial airliners to aid in terrain avoidance as well as new procedures to be used with automated aircraft navigation systems.

Let’s take a closer look at the causes of this accident and some of the changes resulting from the investigation.

Where is it Taking Us?

Alfonso Bonilla Aragón International Airport, which serves Cali, lies in a valley with mountainous terrain rising to over 12,000 ft on either side of the north-south running Cauca Valley. The arrival path of AA965 had the aircraft descending through this valley to pass over the airport and then reverse course to land to the north.
At some point though, the controller, who had no operable radar due to terrorist activity, offered the crew a straight-in approach to land to the south on the north-south runway. The crew accepted this clearance but were now high on profile without the turn around to lose the excess altitude. Thus they were expediting their descent with the aircraft’s speed brakes being extended.

There was also some confusion in the instructions given to the crew by air traffic control with the aircrew finally asking to proceed directly to a radio beacon near the airport. This beacon, really just a radio transmitter, was named “Rozo NDB”. It is here where a database error and a lack of situational awareness caused problems.

The paper charts which the crew was using listed the Rozo beacon by its identifier as the letter “R”. That meant that typing that identifier into the computer should have caused the aircraft to fly to the Rozo beacon straight down the valley. The database installed in the aircraft, however, had an error and differed from the paper charts the crew was using, The identifier of the Rozo beacon in the electronic database was “ROZO” and not the letter “R” as the crew believed.

Thus when the crew typed in “R”, the aircraft turned left towards another beacon located 130 miles to the east in Bogota named “Romeo”. This beacon actually did have its identifier listed as “R” in the electronic database. This turn to the east took the aircraft directly into the mountains on the east side of the Cauca Valley.

Maintain Situational Awareness

If the above description is confusing for you to read, imagine what was going through the minds of those pilots as they tried to sort out where they were and why their airplane was mysteriously turning when it should’ve been going straight south to the runway. It took the crew about a minute to sort out that the airplane shouldn’t be turning and another minute to start a turn back to safety. But even though they eventually got terrain warnings and had started an emergency climb, they had descended too far into the mountains and hit a ridge at an elevation of about 8900 ft.

One of the prime directives of aviation, drilled into all pilots from the beginning of their careers, is to maintain situational awareness. This means knowing what is going on around you at all times. It is a fundamental skill in aviation. This crew was set up by a database error, but should have had an idea that any turn off their course down the valley was ill advised. They should also have known that they had descended below the altitude of the mountains bordering the valley.

One of the luxuries that US based airlines enjoy is a first rate air traffic control system which is unparalleled in not only maintaining traffic separation, which is their main objective, but also in providing terrain avoidance. They’re so good at it in fact, that it is easy for pilots to become complacent about the need to always be vigilant about terrain if for no other reason than they (and their passengers) will suffer the consequences of any such complacency.

The same, unfortunately, cannot be said for many countries without the superb infrastructure found in most first world countries. While most controllers are excellent at what they do, the Colombian controller had no radar with which to warn American 965 that they were in danger. It is the pilot’s’ sole responsibility to maintain awareness of any terrain clearance problems.

Not in Vain

The story does not end here. The fallout from this accident was wide ranging. The database error which led the pilots to make a wrong turn into the mountains prompted a thorough review of the navigational databases which are used by commercial aircraft, including safeguards to ensure that the information printed on charts matches that in navigation databases. Flight crew procedures were also changed to ensure that a “common sense” check of any computer commands were made before those commands were executed in the navigation computers.

It also became apparent that faster and more capable computers coupled with GPS receivers would be able to provide a whole new level of protection against controlled flight into terrain (CFIT). Ever since the crash of Eastern Airlines 401 into the Florida everglades in 1972, commercial aircraft have had a system installed that is known as the Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS). Pronounced “jip whiz”, this system warns pilots of approaching terrain through a downward looking radio altimeter.

GPWS is the source of the electronically generated “PULL UP” command you may have heard in movies or when the system is tested at the gate. The limitation of this system is that there is no way to reliably warn pilots of very rapidly rising terrain as the system can only look straight down at what is directly below the airplane. In fact, the GPWS system on American 965 did warn the pilots of danger but not until it was too late.

Enhanced GPWS

A new system called Enhanced GPWS has since been designed to use a database of all the terrain an aircraft is expected to encounter either regionally or globally. When coupled with GPS location, this system can give pilots enough warning to avoid any possible terrain conflicts well in advance of encountering any high terrain. It generates a terrain map on the primary flight display. This display looks somewhat like an old fashioned topographic map but terrain is displayed in green, yellow, or red depending on the height of the terrain in relation to aircraft altitude.

The system is proactive and will also generate cautions and warnings based on the current aircraft trajectory and any terrain that may be a danger. Pilots are warned well in advance of any projected terrain encounters. The system finally gives pilots real time feedback on exactly where they are in relation to high terrain, a problem which has always plagued aviation.

Aviation is safer now than at any time in history but this is no accident. Many accidents are caused by carelessness or complacency on the part of crews or maintainers, but occasionally something is learned that materially affects the safety of the entire industry. American Airlines 965 was a tragedy for everyone aboard that fated airliner as well as for their friends and families, but at least in this one case, real changes were made which will make a recurrence of this accident much less likely.

The next airplane trip you take will also be safer because of lessons learned from the crash of American 965.

Addendum: Counterfeit Parts and Aircraft Design

Two other issues were brought to light in the aftermath of American 965. One that was highlighted was the existence of an international network of counterfeit aircraft parts as some of the parts from the wreckage began to show up on the black market. Aircraft parts are built to exacting and expensive standards, so an incentive exists for unscrupulous actors to sell counterfeit and stolen parts. Parts with serial numbers from AA 965 did make their way into this network.

A second issue was that of cockpit design. When the pilots realized that they were near the terrain, they initiated an emergency climb, but neglected to retract the speedbrakes which they had been using to descend. Because the aircraft hit the ridge only a few hundred feet below the summit, speculation was made as to whether the speed brakes should automatically retract when the throttles are pushed up and whether doing so would have saved the aircraft. Some aircraft have this feature while others do not, but highlighting the issue should make pilots aware of the potential problem.