Home Blog Page 14

England vs. Germany: A Tale of Two 24-Cylinder Engines

During World War II, Great Britain and Germany deployed powerful 24-cylinder engines for their aircraft.

Both nations began working on the engines before the war started. Ultimately, the British proved more successful with their Napier Sabre engine over the German Junkers Jumo 222.

British Napier Sabre 24-Cylinder Engine

Great Britain first considered developing the 24-cylinder Napier Sabre engine in 1937. The Napier & Son manufacturer had been making engines since 1917, during The First World War, when they produced the Napier Lion, a 12-cylinder motor they produced until 1943. Engine designer Frank Hord theorized that an engine with more, smaller cylinders would be more powerful than one with fewer, larger cylinders.

The Napier Sabre 24-cylinder engine on a test stand. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com
The Napier Sabre 24-cylinder engine on a test stand. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The Napier Sabre essentially consisted of four 6-cylinder engines geared together with twin crankshafts into a single output shaft. It was liquid-cooled and had a new system of sleeve valves instead of poppet valves used on most other engines. The sleeve valves made the Napier Sabre more powerful and fuel-efficient. Napier first tested it in January 1938 at 1350 horsepower, and by that summer, it was putting out 2200 and 2400 by the end of that year.

British Speed Engine Production as War Begins

Following the successful 100-hour testing of the 24-cylinder engine, the British rushed it into production at the beginning of the war. They installed it into the Hawker Tempest V, Typhoon 1, and 1B fighters and the Folland Fo. 108 fighter.

Among 24-cylinder engines was the Napier Sabre Engine, which powered the Hawker Typhoon Fighter
The Napier Sabre Engine powered the Hawker Typhoon Fighter. | Image: Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The powerful engine gave the fighters outstanding low-altitude performance. The Napier Sabre was the fastest Allied engine, giving aircraft more speed than the 12-cylinder engines in British Spitfire fighters.

Manufacturing and Performance Problems with Napier Sabre

Despite its performance, the Napier Sabre had significant problems and drew complaints from pilots and maintenance crews. Some of these issues were manufacturing errors, with bits of metal left inside engines, often resulting in broken piston components. Crews also experienced oil overheating and engine seizures.

Image Demonstrating the Size of the Massive British Engine. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com
Image Demonstrating the Size of the Massive British Engine. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

Although the engine was effective at low altitudes, it was not strong enough above 20,000 feet. In 1942, Napier started working on a supercharger to provide better high-altitude performance. However, the company was sold to English Electric. They gave up on the supercharger but improved the engine’s reliability, extending its time between overhauls from 25 to 250 hours.

Another problem occurred in 1944 during operations at Normandy. The 24-cylinder engines were sucking airborne sand, which grounded the planes until new air filters could arrive more than a week later.

Napier Sabre 24-Cylinder Engines Effective in Combat

The Napier Sabre 24-cylinder engine was effective against German aircraft throughout the war. The Typhoons became the fastest low-altitude aircraft and were especially successful at attacking German V1 bombs.

Another view of the Napier Sabre Engine, one of England's 24-cylinder engines used in World War II
Another view of the Napier Sabre Engine. | Image: airandspace.si.edu

As the war progressed, the British wanted to increase the power of their engines. Napier considered using water and methane injection to raise the Sabre’s output to 3000 horsepower. They even experimented with a 32-cylinder version, which they hoped would produce 4000 horsepower. It did not make it into production.

German Jumo-222 24-Cylinder Engine

Before and during World War II, the Germans worked on their own 24-cylinder engine, the Junkers Jumo 222. In 1936, the German Air Ministry (RLM) decided they needed an 1800-horsepower engine for the bombers in development. Ferdinand Brandner joined Junkers and took charge of the project. He set an initial goal to build a new 2000-horsepower engine and named it Jumo 222. They finalized the initial design in 1937.

The Junkers Jumo 222, one of the 24-cylinder engines used by England in World War II
Side View of the Junkers Jumo 222 24-Cylinder Engine. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The plan was for the Jumo 222 to power the Junkers Ju 88 bomber. During the Second World War, Junkers was the only Axis company building both aircraft and engines, something that would contribute to its eventual failure.

The Jumo 222 was a liquid-cooled, radial, 24-cylinder engine. It had six-cylinder banks with four cylinders each, positioned around the crankcase in a hexagonal pattern. As the months progressed, the Germans continually increased their requirements for power output from the Jumo 222.

Germans Planned to Use Jumo 222 Engine in New Bomber

Along with the Ju 88 bomber, the Germans were developing a new high-speed medium bomber, the “Bomber B.” They expected it to carry a 4410-pound bomb load, 2,237 miles, at about 373 miles per hour. They eventually tested the Jumo 222 in 11 different aircraft, including the bombers: a Focke-Wulf Fw 191 and a Heinkel He 219 Uhu (“Eagle-Owl”).

In 1940, following weight increases to the JU 288 from adding a crew member and new equipment, the Germans raised the power requirements for the 222 to 2500 horsepower. The next version of the 24-cylinder Juno 222, the C/D, came in 1941 with a 2500-3000 horsepower requirement for high altitudes. This was initially just a goal until 1945 when the RLM determined they “desperately” needed a 3000-horsepower engine.

24-cylinder englines like the Junkers Jumo 222 powered the Junkers JU-288 Bomber
Junkers Jumo 222 Powered the Junkers JU-288 Bomber. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

Allied Bombing Impacts Engine Production.

While the Jumo 222 did well in testing, problems interfered with its development. Allied bombing in 1943 and 1944 caused shortages and began to affect German industry. This forced the RLM to choose which aircraft and engines to produce.

Delays for Jumo 222 Due to Changing Requirements

Perhaps the most interesting problem for the Jumo 22 was that it may have been delayed intentionally. Some have gone as far as suggesting that the requirements kept changing, causing both the engine and JU 288 bomber to fail.

Closeup Showing the Tight Fit of the Large Jumo 222 Engine -- one of the 24-cylinder engines used during the Second World War
Closeup Showing the Tight Fit of the Large Jumo 222 Engine. | Image: oldmachinepress.com

Ferdinand Brandner, one of the 24-cylinder engine’s designers, said, “The tragedy of this engine development lay in the continual demands for performance increases that came from the airframe development side, which, because of continually increasing weight excesses, could not attain the calculated flying performance. The Jumo 222 was developed to death.”

Frequent Design Changes Possibly Used to Prevent Improvements

According to some reports, Erhard Milch, Air Inspector General of the Luftwaffe and in charge of aircraft production, wanted the program to fail. Milch announced he was concerned that Junkers would monopolize engines and aircraft. Some felt he was altering production requirements “just as they were about to be met by Junkers.” Regardless of the reason, Junkers could never keep up with all the changes.

The Germans saw an eventual need for more powerful powerplants than the Jumo 222 24-cylinder engine. In 1937, they started planning for a Jumo 255. This would have 36 cylinders, and they forecasted it to produce 3500-4000 horsepower. Germany never actually built the Jumo 225.

British Napier Sabre More Successful Than German Jumo-222

Both the Napier Sabre and German Jumo 222 engines had problems throughout their development. However, the Napier Sabre was clearly more successful in the war effort.

The proof is in the numbers: Great Britain produced about 5,000 Napier Sabres, while Germany only produced 289 Jumo 222s.

Qatar Airways, Boeing Announce Historic $96B Order

Could a massive order from Qatar Airways for Boeing widebodies be yet another sign that Boeing’s woes are finally in the rearview mirror?

Boeing has weathered a storm of setbacks in recent years, from safety scandals to production delays and financial losses.

Yet, a string of 2025 deals, headlined by a historic $96 billion order from Qatar Airways for up to 210 widebody aircraft, is a massive win for a company in desperate need of wins. 

This deal—Boeing’s largest-ever widebody and 787 Dreamliner order—was announced on 14 May 2025 in Doha and significantly bolsters the company’s recovery.  

A ‘Landmark’ Deal in Doha

Qatar Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner
Qatar Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner | IMAGE: Qatar Airways

The Qatar Airways order, unveiled at a high-profile accord-signing ceremony in Doha on Wednesday, includes firm commitments for 130 Boeing 787 Dreamliners and 30 Boeing 777-9 jets, with options for 50 additional aircraft of either type.

Today’s announcement coincides with US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the Gulf Arab country, the second stop on his tour of the Middle East.  

Valued at $96 billion, it was announced alongside Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, President Trump, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, Stephanie Pope, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, and Qatar Airways Group CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer.

Valued at $96 billion, it was announced alongside Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, President Trump, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, Stephanie Pope, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, and Qatar CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer.
Valued at $96 billion, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg (L) signs the accord alongside (from L-R) US President Donald Trump, Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, and Qatar Airways CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer | IMAGE: Qatar Airways

After Ortberg signed the deal, President Donald Trump congratulated the OEM.

“Congratulations to Boeing,” Trump said. Get those planes out there. Get them out there.”

Congratulations to Boeing. Get those planes out there. Get them out there.

US President Donald J. Trump

This order would nearly double the capacity of Qatar Airways, operating a 230-aircraft fleet from its central hub at Doha Hamad International Airport (DOH). The carrier serves nearly 200 destinations—including 11 US cities like Miami (MIA), New York (JFK), Los Angeles (LAX), San Francisco (SFO), Washington (IAD), Houston (IAH), Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW), Atlanta (ATL), Boston (BOS), Chicago O’Hare (ORD), and Seattle (SEA).

This widebody order will undoubtedly leverage the 787’s fuel efficiency and the 777X’s extended range to bolster long-haul operations. With this agreement, Qatar will become the largest Dreamliner operator in the Middle East. It is the largest aircraft order in Qatar’s history.

“We are happy to announce our agreement with Boeing and our partnership in the largest aircraft order in our history,” said Qatar CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer. “A critical next step for Qatar Airways on our path as we invest in the cleanest, youngest, and most efficient fleet in global aviation. This so we can meet the strong demand in the airline as we seamlessly connect passengers to the world better than anyone.”

Qatar, a loyal Boeing customer with 64 Boeing 777s (seven -200s, 57 -300ERs) and 53 787s (31 -8s, 22 -9s), also operates a large number of Airbus aircraft, including 27 A320-200s, 11 A330s (three -200s, eight -300s), 58 A350 XWBs (34 -900s, 24 -1000s), and eight A380-800s. Bloomberg reports Qatar may order more A350s at the 2025 Paris Air Show next month.

The Economic and Strategic Impact of Boeing’s Orders

Saudi aircraft lessor AviLease Boeing 737-8
Saudi Arabian lessor AviLease placed an order for up to 30 Boeing 737 MAX 8s | IMAGE: Boeing

The deal is a boon for Boeing, which is grappling with a $500 billion, 5,700-jet backlog and no profits since 2018. The White House estimates the deal “will support 154,000 U.S. jobs annually, totaling over 1 million jobs during the course of production and delivery.” GE Aerospace benefits significantly, with its GE9X and GEnx engines powering the 777X and 787, respectively, reinforcing Boeing’s supply chain and US manufacturing. The order, comprising more than 400 GE9X and GEnx engines, also represents the largest widebody engine deal in GE Aerospace history. 

This order follows other 2025 wins. On 13 May, Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh-based aircraft lessor AviLease placed a $4.8 billion order for up to 30 Boeing 737 MAX 8s (20 firm, 10 options), its first-ever direct order with Boeing. Just last week, International Airlines Group (IAG) announced a $10 billion deal for 32 787-10 Dreamliners for British Airways, spurred by a US-U.K. trade agreement. 

These contracts signal renewed confidence in Boeing’s portfolio, particularly its widebody offerings, as it competes with Airbus. It’s certainly the best Boeing has looked in a long while. 

Boeing’s Production Turnaround

Boeing's 787 Dreamliner assembly plant in North Charleston, SC
Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner assembly plant in North Charleston, SC | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s 2025 performance is encouraging. The company has delivered 175 aircraft year-to-date, including 45 in April and 41 in March, up 50% from 107 during the same period in 2024. Projections indicate 560 deliveries in 2025, compared to 348 in 2024, with a potential 800 by 2028. This ramp-up is critical for clearing the backlog and restoring profitability, especially for the 737 program, Boeing’s “meat-and-potatoes.”

The Qatar order diversifies Boeing’s production, reducing reliance on the 737 program. The 787, built in Everett and North Charleston, South Carolina, benefits from streamlined processes, though quality control remains under scrutiny. The 777X, awaiting certification with deliveries slated for 2026, is a long-term bet. Qatar’s commitment validates Boeing’s widebody strategy.

Overcoming Challenges

Boeing factory workers in Everett
Boeing factory workers in Everett at a company training to implement high standards of quality and safety practices | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s recovery follows a rocky decade, including the 737 MAX crashes and the January 2024 Alaska Airlines Flight 1262 incident, where a window plug blew out midflight shortly after takeoff from Portland International Airport (PDX). 

The near-catastrophe raised urgent safety concerns, prompting CEO Kelly Ortberg’s return from retirement. Since then, he has prioritized safety and quality, helped resolve a 2024 worker strike, and stabilized finances. Additionally, Ortberg has implemented much stricter supplier audits and production oversight to rebuild public trust.

It’s worth noting that this deal comes amid controversy surrounding a potential Qatari gift of a Boeing 747-8 to President Trump and ongoing delays with the new Air Force One program. That said, AvGeekery’s focus remains squarely on aviation—we’ll leave the political angles to other outlets.

The Road Ahead

Belly of 777X bound for Qatar Airways
Boeing Classic Qatar Air 777X Flyover TPC at Snoqualmie Ridge | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s 2025 wins are encouraging for the beleaguered manufacturer. The Qatar deal, the largest widebody and 787 order in Boeing’s history underscores continued confidence in its products. 

Going forward, Boeing’s stakes are clear. It must maintain and improve quality, accelerate the certification process for the 777X, 737 MAX 7, and 737 MAX 10, and sustain delivery momentum. 

Boeing’s path forward requires precision. With 560 deliveries targeted for 2025 and a long-term goal of 800 by 2028, Ortberg’s leadership will be tested. For now, the Qatar order is an unequivocally significant step in the right direction. 

Could it be that Boeing is climbing out of its challenges and heading toward a brighter future? Time will tell, but if the first few months of 2025 are any indication, we are betting big on our storied planemaker. 

How Lightning Doomed Pan Am Flight 214 in 1963

Thankfully, today’s travelers are unlikely to experience a tragedy such as one from Pan Am Flight 214 over Maryland nearly 62 years ago.

Today’s commercial aircraft can safely withstand lightning with little to no harm to anybody on board. Over 60 years ago, however, aircraft were more vulnerable to problems that came from lightning strikes, and that was especially true for Pan American World Airways (Pan Am) Flight 214.

On 8 December 1963, Flight 214 took off after a refuel in Baltimore, Maryland, with the aircraft plummeting to the earth 35 minutes later. None of the 81 people on board survived the crash.

Pan Am Flight 214, a Boeing 707-121, Crashed in Maryland Following a Lightning Strike

Pan Am Flight 214 departed San Juan, Puerto Rico, at 1610 local time. Almost reaching its destination in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the flight stopped at Baltimore’s Friendship International Airport (BAL) to refuel at 1935 local. An airline mechanic inspected the aircraft before taking off once more.

The crew aboard the flight turned back to Baltimore due to Philadelphia weather and waited in a holding pattern so the plane could safely land. The crew decided to return to BAL because Philadelphia was experiencing strong winds. The aircraft was reportedly flying at 5,000 feet during this pattern.

At 2058, lightning struck the Boeing, causing the fuel inside the reserves to explode and catch fire. The Philadelphia Approach Control frequency repeatedly received “Mayday” messages. Another transmission was heard saying, “Clipper 214 is going down in flames.”

The plane crashed two miles from Elkton, Maryland, with a large part of the plane’s left wing separated. All 73 passengers and eight crew members died.

The wreckage of Pan Am Flight 214
Image: NTSB

Witnesses of the accident recalled a light rain that evening, with cloudy skies and lightning. According to a weather report in Wilmington, Delaware, nine miles east of the accident site, a thunderstorm began at 2054 local time, just a few minutes after the plane departed Baltimore.

In 1965, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) filed an extensive aircraft accident report of the flight.

How Lightning Brought Down a Boeing 707

Several key factors caused the vulnerability to lightning damage of the Boeing 707-121:

Lack of Protective Measures: In the 1960s, commercial aircraft didn’t have protection from lightning like they do today. These measures include static dischargers or protecting housing for fuel reserves. The Flight 214 crash led to research into improving and protecting the fuel tank to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Fuel Tank Design: Boeing also didn’t consider the risks of lightning strikes when designing the aircraft’s fuel tank. While investigators never determined the source of the ignition, researchers had a strong guess that it was a combination of improper bonding and the left wing’s skin overheating, exposing flammable fuel vapors from inside. This oversight would cause the lightning current to travel to the fuel tank and cause the ignition.

Opting For a Holding Pattern: In hindsight, putting the jet into a holding pattern at 5,000 feet was an extreme risk. Lightning is most prevalent at low altitudes; this type of lightning is known as ‘cloud-to-ground lightning.’

The CVR from Pan Am Flight 214
“1963 Wire Photo worker looks at recorder from Pan American Flight 214 Aircraft crash”

The Pan Am Flight 214 Tragedy Led to Important Improvements in Aviation Safety

Pan Am Flight 214 is often known as a ‘catalyst’ for researchers looking to prevent risks brought on by lightning when planning vehicle production.

Each airplane that flies regularly will be hit by lightning at least once yearly. Aircraft today are durable enough to withstand lightning strikes, which travel through the jet on their way to the Earth. The most damage lightning can typically cause is holes, cracks, or burn marks on the plane’s exterior.

More often than not, nobody on a commercial aircraft knows when a lightning strike occurs, thanks to decades of manufacturers overcoming the shortcomings that led to specific scenarios like the tragedy of Flight 214.

Collaborative Combat Aircraft Teaming with Next Generation Fighters

The Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) initiative is a crucial component of the U.S. Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, ensuring the service maintains air superiority into the future.

The basic plan for the CCA is to deploy semi-autonomous aircraft in unmanned-manned teams, along with manned fifth— and sixth-generation fighters. Following a bidding period, the Air Force has chosen Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to design, build, and test prototypes for the program.

Collaborative Combat Aircraft to be Cost Effective and Versatile

The broad concept for the CCA is to develop a new type of mostly autonomous unmanned aircraft that is significantly cheaper than piloted fighters. The new collaborative combat aircraft (CCAs) will carry a variety of sensors, weapons, and tactical systems. They will perform missions including intelligence gathering, surveillance and reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and striking targets.

In a 2022 test of Collaborative Combat Aircraft capabilities, General Atomics paired its MQ-20 Avenger unmanned aircraft with a Sabreliner and two F-5 Advanced Tigers. | Image: General Atomics
In a 2022 test of its Collaborative Combat Aircraft capabilities, General Atomics paired its MQ-20 Avenger unmanned aircraft with a Sabreliner and two F-5 Advanced Tigers. | Image: General Atomics

Significant Cost Advantages with CCAs

There are some key reasons for the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. First, CCAs will cost about one-third the cost of manned fifth—and sixth-generation fighters. Another cost benefit will be due to the CCAs’ flying schedule. Being unmanned, they will not require as many daily sorties as manned aircraft to maintain combat readiness. Also, much of the training for CCAs will occur virtually, resulting in fewer sorties. Maintenance costs will also be lower with fewer flights and less wear and tear.

Tactical and Strategic Advantages of CCAs

These cost advantages will allow the Air Force to acquire a large number of CCAs, which fits well with tactical and strategic plans. For example, China is developing advanced long-range air defense systems that could seriously challenge U.S. aircraft. By deploying large numbers of CCAs in a swarm without direct human supervision, the Air Force could overwhelm enemy defenses.

The Anduril YFQ-44A unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft. | Image: Anduril
The Anduril YFQ-44A unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft. | Image: Anduril

“You can create mass, and so many targets out in the battlespace that your adversary will have to worry about … is that something that I have to use some munitions on,” said General Kenneth Wilsbach in 2023, then Commander of Pacific Air Forces.

Initial plans are for the Air Force to deploy 1000 CCAs. The mission profile will be to pair two CCAs with advanced fighters. The Air Force called the CCA program “a cost-effective and pragmatic solution to possess a formidable airpower capacity.”

Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Building First CCAs

In April 2024, the Air Force selected Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to develop the first-generation Combined Combat Aircraft. The Anduril design is the YFQ-44A, and the General Atomics model is the YFQ-42A. The names come from Air Force aircraft designations of “Y” for prototype, “F” for fighter, “Q”  for unmanned aircraft, “44” for design number, and “A” for first version.

Anduril Aircraft to Have Stealthy Characteristics

The Anduril YFQ-44A will have components, including passive infrared and infrared search and track (IRST) sensors. Early photographs of the YFQ-44A show stealthy features like an angular shape for the air intake and a trapezoidal-shaped nose landing gear bay door.

“Today, just one year after Anduril was selected to produce production-representative prototypes for the CCA program, the Air Force announced that Anduril’s YFQ-44A has begun ground testing,” said Dr. Jason Levin, senior vice president of Air Dominance & Strike at Anduril.

The Anduril YFQ-44A design, also called the “Fury,” is scheduled to make its first flight this summer (2025).

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems CCA Suited for Combat

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems YFQ-44A has features that show its suitability for combat missions. These include internal bays that can carry AIM-120 AMRAMM air-to-air missiles and additional payload space for other munitions. It also features stealthy features like a dorsal air intake high on the fuselage, an elongated shape, and V-tails.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Collaborative Combat Aircraft.| Image: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems
General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Collaborative Combat Aircraft.| Image: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems

The Collaborative Combat Aircraft program will operate, in part, with autonomy control software created by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA’s) Air Combat Evolution (ACE) system. Artificial Intelligence will also be part of the control system for the CCAs.

CCA Receives Significant Funding

The amount of money the Air Force dedicates to the CCA program shows how serious it is about the program. Its preliminary budget request in 2024 was for $490 million to speed up the development and testing of the CCAs. The service has also proposed an additional investment of $6 billion through 2028.

An Airline Just for Sports Teams? Champion Air’s Inspiring 21-Year Story

With large groups of people needing to travel all across the country, one company easily saw an opportunity to do business with several sports teams that had to fly to 20 to 30 destinations in a single season.

For over twenty years, Champion Air became a trusted name for NBA, NHL, and collegiate teams. In the late 2010s, it inspired teams to start purchasing their own jets. This article explores Champion Air’s history.

Champion Air’s Big Bet

Champion Air started out as MGM Grand Air in 1987. It was founded by businessman Kirk Kerkorian, who also owned the titular hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. The airline initially focused on upscale leisure travel on Boeing 727s and Douglas DC-8s.

The airline flew the LAX to JFK route and catered primarily to businessmen and celebrities who had a lot of money to spend. However, the airline later discovered it was losing business to private jet companies. After realizing the uphill battle, Kerkorian wanted to sell the airline in 1994.

In July 1995, MGM Grand sold the airline to Front Page Tours, a tour operator based in Edina, Minnesota. Front Page Tours planned to use the airline to charter sports teams and their fans. The airline’s name was changed to Champion Air, and the fleet was updated to customized Boeing 727s.

Champion Air would move its hub to Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) and establish other destinations in Detroit, Dallas, Denver, Las Vegas, St. Louis, and Oklahoma City.

The airline would then serve two purposes: charter sports teams during seasons and charter customers who had purchased MLT Vacations packages, as Northwest owned MLT Vacations at the time.

Champion Air Goes for Gold

In March 1997, Front Page Tours sold the airline to a joint venture between Northwest Airlines and Minnesota Twins owner Carl Pohlad. Champion Air’s headquarters relocated to Northwest’s Minneapolis headquarters. Though Northwest owned Sun Country Airlines, this acquisition allowed Champion Air to surpass Sun Country as the number-one charter operator in the region.

It didn’t appear Champion Air was open to flying the everyday passenger as early reports indicated. Based on the list of destinations, the airline would charter teams like the Minnesota Timberwolves and/or Wild, Detroit Pistons and/or Red Wings, Dallas Mavericks and/or Stars, the Denver Nuggets, the Colorado Avalanche, and the St. Louis Blues.

1600px Champion Air%2C Boeing 727 200%2C N678MG %2816697458948%29
Image: By BriYYZ from Wikimedia Commons

In the mid-2000s, Champion Air wasn’t doing too well financially, despite interest in MLT Vacations among travelers. In late 2007, Northwest would transfer all MLT customers’ flights from Champion Air to Northwest. Seeing that most of Champion’s revenue came from MLT, this was a big blow for the carrier.

The writing was on the wall for Champion Air in December 2007. Champion Air CEO Lee Steele told reporters that the airline ‘lost all contract revenue’ on its pre-existing charter arrangements for the 13 NBA teams and Northwest’s subsidiary MLT Vacations.

Champion Air Eliminated from Contention

On 31 March 2008, Champion Air announced that it would cease operations on 31 May, when most NBA teams were finished playing that season. At the time of closing, the airline had 14 Boeing 727s and around 550 employees.

The explanation was the high cost of jet fuel, which, at the time, was oil at more than $100 per barrel. A representative claimed the airline had enough money to pay for staffing and operations until the last flight.

One anonymous employee commented on the airline’s closing at the end of May 2008.

‘I am not going to discuss or debate the circumstances only to say that the company responsibly closed out operations without leaving passengers stranded or filing for bankruptcy,’ he said.

The 727 operated by Champion Air %282419569892%29
Image: By Cory W. Watts from Wikimedia Commons

Most of the remaining 727s were later scrapped, while the rest were sold to ‘foreign carriers.’

Northwest Airlines would later handle the contracts of the 13 NBA teams, though the airline didn’t even make it to the following preseason. Delta Air Lines acquired Northwest Airlines later in 2008. MLT Vacations then rebranded as Delta Vacations, which is still in business today.

Flawless Launch as China Sends 3 Astronauts to Tiangong Space Station

On 24 April 2025, China launched a Long March 2F rocket carrying a Shenzhou spacecraft and three astronauts to its Tiangong space station.

The rocket blasted off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northern China, located 93 miles from the border with Mongolia.

Successful Launch and Arrival at Space Station

According to astrophysicist Dr. Maggie Liu, the launch was “flawless, as expected,” adding, “This rocket has launched with a 100% success rate since the 90s, so it’s no surprise this is smooth sailing for them.”

The Chinese Long-March-2F rocket lifting off on 24 April 2025. | Image: The Launch Pad Network
The Chinese Long March 2F rocket lifting off on 24 April 2025. | Image: The Launch Pad Network

Following an approximately 6.5-hour flight, the spacecraft docked with the Tiangong space station. This station orbits the earth between 217 and 280 miles, similar to the 200 – 250 mile range of the International Space Station.

A Chinese Shenzhou spacecraft like the one that docked at the Tiangong space station on 24 April 2025. | Image: SpaceChina
A Chinese Shenzhou spacecraft like the one that docked at the Tiangong space station on 24 April 2025. | Image: SpaceChina

Crew to Remain in Space for Six Months

The crew that just went to space is replacing the current Chinese astronauts, who arrived at the station in October 2024 and have been there for 175 days. They returned to Earth on 30 April 2025, following a brief overlap with the new group. The new crew will live on the station for six months.

While in space, the astronauts will perform spacewalks to perform maintenance, install new equipment, and conduct experiments in new technologies and medical science.

China Space Station Core Module Deployed In 2021

China launched the core “Tianhe” module in April 2021. Located in the center of the station, it provides life support and has crew living quarters. The following year, China launched two additional sections, the Wentian and Mengtian laboratory and experiment modules.

View during a spacewalk at the Chinese space station. | Image: CMSA/CCTV/Chinese Academy of Sciences
View during a spacewalk at the Chinese space station. | Image: CMSA/CCTV/Chinese Academy of Sciences

The Wentian module, on the left side of the station, has more living quarters, supplemental life support equipment, and an external system with a robotic arm. The Mengtian module, on the right, has an airlock, which astronauts can use to transfer experiments and equipment in and out of the station.

The first cargo mission to the Tiangong space station, Tianzhou-2, launched on 29 May 2021. Following this, the first crewed mission, carrying three astronauts, launched on 17 June 2021. They stayed in space for three months, testing equipment and preparing the station for future missions.

United States Bans China from International Space Station

In 2011, the United States Congress banned the Chinese from participating in the ISS program, citing security concerns. Referencing a law called the “Wolf Amendment,” Congress blocked NASA from cooperating with the China National Space Administration (CNSA). No Chinese astronaut has visited the ISS.  After this, if China wanted to establish a presence in space, they had no choice but to build their own facility.

Tiangong Space Station has Three Modules – For Now

The Tiangong space station, at about 24 tons, has about 20% of the mass of the ISS, which weighs about 400 tons. While it has three modules, the ISS has 16.

The core Tianhe module measures 54 feet in length. It has a docking hub to connect with crew and cargo spacecraft and its robotic arm, which crews use to position the Mengtian and Wentian modules.

Major Expansion Planned In Coming Years

China plans to significantly expand the Tiangong space station in the next few years. The expansion will primarily involve new sections, the next one due to be installed in about four years.

“We will build a 180-ton, six-module assembly in the future,” said Zhang Qiao of the China Academy of Space Technology (CAST).

Image during a test of an inflatable module during an earlier mission. | Image: China Association for Science and Technology
Image during a test of an inflatable module during an earlier mission. | Image: China Association for Science and Technology

Part of this will be a multipurpose expansion module with six docking ports. Other full-size sections will then connect to the station. For this expansion, China is developing inflatable modules. They will serve as additional crew living areas and preliminary stages for future missions to the moon. The expansion will also allow more spacecraft to dock at the station simultaneously.

China Developing Its Version of the Hubble Space Telescope

China is also developing a telescope similar to the Hubble Space Telescope. Initial plans are to orbit near the station and dock with it for repairs, maintenance, refueling, and upgrades.

Artist rendition of future space telescope. | Image: National Astronomical Observatory of China
Artist rendition of future space telescope. | Image: National Astronomical Observatory of China

The country also wants to attract international visitors to Tiangong. For example, Pakistan plans to send one of its astronauts on a future Chinese mission. China also hopes to send commercial spacecraft and tourists to the station eventually.

The Tiangong space station is just one part of the Chinese space program. They have explored the far side of the moon, landed a rover on Mars, and want to land a manned mission on the moon before 2030. They have even hinted about a possible future mission to Jupiter.

Tupolev Tu-144: The Flawed Soviet Spectacle that Beat Concorde

The Concorde may have been a game-changing jet when it entered service in 1976, but a rival Russian jet—the Tupolev Tu-144—happened to be in the air one year earlier.

The earlier service, however, was a detriment to the ambitious aircraft, as the Tupolev wasn’t as refined overall as its Western European competitor. Thus, its history was a little more uneventful.

The Birth of the Soviets’ ‘Konkordski’

While England and France collaborated on developing the Concorde, Russia wanted to not only have an answer but also beat it to the market. With the help of aerospace company Tupolev, Russia built the Tu-144, nicknamed the ‘Konkordski.’

Development of the supersonic jet began in 1963, with the plan being to build four prototypes by 1966. The Tu-144 took its maiden flight on 31 December 1968, which predated the Concorde’s first flight by a couple of months.

The Tu-144 was a very impressive jet at the time of its development. The Russian jet exceeded the Concorde in top speed at 1,518 miles per hour (2,443 kilometers per hour), Mach 2.35. However, the Tu-144 was much less efficient.

1973 06 Bourget TU144 281329
Tupolev Tu-144 | Image: P.L THILL from Wikimedia Commons

Mainly, the Tu-144 was almost 50,000 pounds heavier than the Concorde, which made control and maneuvering more difficult. Although the Concorde was more technologically advanced, the braking and aerodynamics of the Tu-144 were not known to measure up even closely.

The 1973 Paris Air Show Tragedy

Tragedy struck at the Paris Air Show when a Tupolev Tu-144 crashed and killed 14 people during an exhibition flight on 3 June 1973. According to eyewitness reports, the crew tried to demonstrate the jet’s acceleration by flying at a low altitude. The aircraft, however, couldn’t endure the stress and began to disintegrate in midair. Tu-144 parts rained on the village below, causing scenes of chaos and destruction.

The Tu-144 crashed in a nearby village, killing all six crew members and eight villagers, including three children. The accident also injured 60 additional people on the ground. Many consider the 1973 crash the moment the jet’s fate was sealed.

Nonetheless, Russia continued its plans to fly the jet commercially, even flying again at the Paris Air Show in later years. In 1975, the Tu-144 began flying mail and cargo between Moscow, Russia, and Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan. Passenger flights were permitted starting in 1977.

Passengers aboard these flights quickly had an unpleasant experience. The interior was very noisy, to the point that colleagues and family members had to exchange written notes to have conversations on flights. The noise was due to the engines and the air conditioners that kept the cabin from overheating.

1600px Tupolev Tu 144 40 Central Air Force Museum
One of the remaining Tupolev Tu-144 airframes still in existence today | Image: Maarten from Wikimedia Commons

The Tupolev Tu-144 Program Comes to an End

Aeroflot had a five-year deal with Tupolev in 1976, but it called it quits on the Tu-144 in 1978 when it crashed again while being delivered to Russia’s flag carrier. The airline only managed 102 flights with the supersonic jet, with just over half the flights carrying passengers.

Tupolev ceased production of the Tu-144 in 1982. The jet was then used by the Soviet program to train space pilots and NASA for supersonic research. The last flight of the Tu-144 occurred on 26 June 1999 as part of NASA’s High-Speed Civil Transport program.

As of this writing, only seven out of 17 Tu-144s are still in one piece. Six of them are on display or in storage in Russia, while one is on the Auto & Technik Museum’s rooftop in Sinsheim, Germany. Of the ten other units, two were destroyed in the accidents mentioned above, six were scrapped, and the other two’s whereabouts are unknown.

Thousands Pre-Order World’s First Commercially Available Flying Car

1

San Mateo, Calif.-based Alef Aeronautics has unveiled the world’s first commercially available flying car, the Alef Model A.

A prototype model made a test flight on 19 February 2025 on a blocked-off road in California. According to Alef’s chief executive officer, Jim Dukhovny, the test was “the first documented verifiable flight of a flying car (an actual car, with vertical takeoff, non-tethered.)”

Closeup image of the Alef Model A flying car. | Image: Alef Aeronautics
Closeup image of the Alef Model A flying car. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

Alef Model A to be Functional Car and Aircraft

Much more than just a toy or a concept vehicle from science fiction, the Alef Model A has attracted significant interest and support, proving the validity and potential of its design. Its basic plan is that it can drive on the road like any car, have vertical takeoff and landing capabilities, and fly in a forward motion. The company also announced a goal for the vehicle to be “affordable for most people.”

The Alef Model A flying car is an all-electric vehicle with a driving range of 200 miles and a flight range of 110 miles. The company has also announced it will provide a hydrogen option, which will extend range capabilities.

Safety a Priority for Alef Aeronautics

In many of its promotional materials, the company mentions how it has made safety features and components an important part of the Model A’s overall design. Alef reported that it has been making test drives and flights since 2019. Dukhovny said that prior to the February test, he had often been asked why he had not released other videos of it flying.

Alef Model A flying car will operate like any other car driving on the road. | Image: Alef Aeronautics
Alef Model A flying car will operate like any other car driving on the road. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

 “We’re obsessed with safety, and we wanted to make sure the car is safe enough for consumers before we actually show it,” said Dukhovny.

Some safety-related components and measures on the Alef Model A flying car include building it with triple to octuple redundancy on certain components, an obstacle detection and avoidance system, and a ballistic parachute. It also has no exposed propellers, even though concept videos show several under the vehicle’s outer skin.

Company Makes Bold Claims for Its Flying Car

As Alef moves closer to full-scale manufacturing of the Model A flying car, the company has made several bold claims about its features and quality. One example came after the February demonstration.

Model A Flying car during another test flight. | Image: Alef Aeronautics
Model A Flying car during another test flight. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

“This drive and flight test represents an important proof of technology in a real-world city environment. We hope it will be a moment similar to the Wright Brothers’ Kitty Hawk video, proving to humanity that new transportation is possible,” said Jim Dukhovny.

In another claim related to the Model A’s energy efficiency, Alef reports, “On average, the Alef flying car uses less energy per trip than a Tesla or any other EV, as well as less energy per trip than eVTOL air taxis.”

The company also stated what customers will pay for a Model A flying car. Their marketing materials state, “It has to be affordable for most people (not just the rich). However, they also announced that the expected price of the vehicle will be $299,999, hardly an affordable cost for most people.

Investors, Manufacturers, and Customers Enthusiastic

Despite this, there is ample evidence of broad support and optimism for the development of the Model A flying car.

Top view of prototype model of Alef Model A. | Image: Alef Aeronautics
Top view of prototype model of Alef Model A. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

Alef has received two patents for its design. Another positive sign for the Model A is that it is the first vehicle with vertical takeoff capability to receive an FAA Special Airworthiness Certificate, which gives it permission to fly in the United States.

In 2015, Alef contacted venture capitalist Tim Draper to see if he might be interested in the flying car project. Draper was impressed and became one of the company’s biggest investors. He has also become a mentor for the leadership team at Alef.

Alef Signs Agreement With Manufacturer

In September 2024, Alef Aeronautics entered a manufacturing agreement with PUCARA Aero and MYC, a Spanish joint venture that has made aviation-grade components for Boeing, Airbus, and other civilian and military aviation companies. Since then, the biggest sign that people are excited about the vehicle is that the company has received over 3200 pre-orders and is planning to begin mass production.

Chinese Company Developing Two Flying Car Designs

Alef is not the only company working on a flying car project. Chinese manufacturer XPENG AEROHT is developing two interesting vehicles. The first is their Land Aircraft Carrier. XPENG AEROHT calls this a “modular flying car.” It is a four-seat, six-wheel vehicle that resembles a minivan. Inside, there is an eVTOL aircraft called the Lunar Rover.

XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft carrier vehicle during deployment of its Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft. | Image: XPENG AEROHT
XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft carrier vehicle during deployment of its Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft. | Image: XPENG AEROHT

The Land Aircraft Carrier operates as a mothership, recharging the aircraft while driving and when parked. The company claims the aircraft will deploy within five minutes after pressing one button. The Lunar Rover has six rotors, and its arms and blades fold to fit inside the mothership. The company hopes to begin selling the vehicle in 2026.

XPENG AEROHT Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft in flight. | Image: XPENG AEROHT
XPENG AEROHT Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft in flight. | Image: XPENG AEROHT

XPENG AEROHT is also beginning to develop its own eVTOL flying car. Early designs for the vehicle resemble a futuristic sports car. Concept images and videos show it driving like a regular car. Then, four rotors deploy from the vehicle’s roof, and it takes off.

Mockup of the XPENG AEROHT eVTOL flying car.| Image: XPENG AEROHT
Mockup of the XPENG AEROHT eVTOL flying car.| Image: XPENG AEROHT

US Unveils Next-Gen ATC System to Revolutionize Aviation Safety

0

On Thursday, US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy introduced a transformative plan for the nation’s air traffic control (ATC) system, describing it as a “state-of-the-art” initiative that “will be the envy of the world.” 

The announcement, made at the Department of Transportation headquarters in Washington, D.C., marks a bold step toward modernizing an outdated system that has long plagued the aviation industry with safety risks, delays, and inefficiencies.

“We are seizing a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build a brand new, state-of-the-art air traffic control system,” Duffy said. “Decades of neglect have left us with an outdated system that is showing its age. Building this new system is an economic and national security necessity, and the time to fix it is now.”

Building this new system is an economic and national security necessity, and the time to fix it is now.

US Department of Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy
US Department of Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy holds up floppy disks
US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and Airlines for America (A4A) president and CEO Nicholas Calio use visual aids like floppy disks and paper flight strips to demonstrate the antiquity of the American ATC system and the need for its overhaul | IMAGE: US Dept of Transportation

The current ATC system’s obsolescence was starkly illustrated during the event, as Duffy used floppy disks and CDs—components still in use—as visual aids. He noted that replacement parts are often sourced from eBay, calling the situation “100% unacceptable.” The new system aims to replace this dangerously antiquated infrastructure with cutting-edge technology to enhance safety, reduce outages, and improve efficiency.

A Comprehensive Overhaul

ATC
IMAGE: FAA

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will spearhead replacing core infrastructure, including radar, software, hardware, and telecommunications networks. The plan is structured around four key components: communications, surveillance, automation, and facilities. Specific actions include:

  • Upgrading Communications: Replacing outdated telecommunications equipment with modern fiber, wireless, and satellite technologies across more than 4,600 sites, installing 25,000 new radios, and deploying 475 new voice switches.
  • Modernizing Surveillance: Replacing 618 aging radars far exceeding their intended lifespan.
  • Enhancing Runway Safety: Expanding the Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) to 200 airports, up from the 50 expected by the end of 2025.
  • Rebuilding Facilities: Six new air traffic control centers—the first since the 1960s—will be constructed while some of the existing 21 centers are closed and consolidated. Additionally, the overhaul calls for replacing 15 towers and 15 Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facilities.
  • Standardizing Technology: Installing new hardware and software to ensure all air traffic facilities operate on a common platform, promoting consistency and safety.
  • Improving Weather Monitoring: Building 174 new weather stations in Alaska to bolster air travel safety. 

A summarized overview of the updates is available here, with a detailed version accessible here.

Addressing a Changing Industry

A United Archer Midnight eVTOL aircraft
A United Archer Midnight eVTOL aircraft | IMAGE: Archer

The new ATC system must accommodate the aviation industry’s increasingly rapid evolution. With drones and advanced air mobility expected to become commonplace, the modernized infrastructure will ensure the system can handle increased complexity and volume. This overhaul complements a recently announced plan to increase air traffic controller staffing, addressing chronic shortages that have raised safety concerns for years.

Duffy emphasized the initiative’s broad support, noting a “large coalition” backing the effort. 

“We won’t let the American people down,” he vowed.

We won’t let the American people down.

US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy

Key industry leaders attended the event, including CEOs Robert Isom (American Airlines), Scott Kirby (United Airlines), Ed Bastian (Delta Air Lines), Robert Jordan (Southwest Airlines), and Joanna Geraghty (JetBlue Airways). Representatives from the FAA, National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), and Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) were also present.

A Tribute to the Victims of Flight 5342

An American Eagle CRJ departs DCA
An American Eagle CRJ departs Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport | IMAGE: Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Facebook

The announcement carried profound emotional weight as families of the victims of PSA Flight 5342 attended the event. Flight 5342 crashed into the Potomac River on 30 January after colliding with a U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopter while approaching Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, killing all 67 on board. 

Every speaker acknowledged the families, emphasizing that the ATC overhaul would serve as a lasting legacy for the victims. Sadly, getting the government to address a crisis simmering for decades took such a horrendous tragedy. 

An Ambitious Timeline and Cost

FAA Tower and East Ramp Control at Harry Reid International Airport (LAS)
FAA Tower and East Ramp Control at Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: LAS

While the price tag for the overhaul remains undisclosed, it is widely expected to reach at least tens of billions of dollars. Duffy acknowledged the significant cost but expressed confidence in securing funding, citing ubiquitous bipartisan support in Congress. He plans to request the full amount upfront to expedite the process.

Duffy set an ambitious goal of completing the overhaul by 2028, a timeline that would require streamlining approval processes that typically span years–not to mention unprecedented bipartisan cooperation in Washington. His promise of a swift overhaul timeline underscores the urgency of ensuring air traffic controllers have a reliable, modern system to support their critical work.

A Clarion Call for a Safer, More Efficient Future

FAA Next-Gen Control Tower
FAA Next-Gen Control Tower. IMAGE: PAU

The unveiling of the next-generation ATC system is a clarion call to reimagine the future of aviation—a future where safety, efficiency, and innovation take their rightful place at the helm of America’s ATC system. This isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a chance to revolutionize the entire system from top to bottom, obliterate the shadows of recent failures, like the chaos of the Newark outage, and propel the United States to the forefront of global aviation leadership. By dismantling obsolete infrastructure and embracing cutting-edge technology, this initiative will slash delays, fortify safety, and unleash the full potential of our skies.

The event concluded with an emotional plea from Duffy.

“If you learn anything from what’s happened, it’s that if there are foreseeable issues in the airspace, you would expect someone to take action to make sure we save lives,” Duffy declared. “This is a way to honor, this is a way to respect, this is a way to pay it forward and to do the right thing to keep our families and our communities safe when they use our airspace.”

This is a way…to do the right thing to keep our families and our communities safe
when they use our airspace.

US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy

This overhaul is a demonstration of our collective resolve. It unites industry titans, safety champions, and the families of Flight 5342’s victims in a shared vision for transformation. Their presence at the announcement was a powerful reminder that this is about honoring the past by building a safer tomorrow.

The time for half-measures is over. Floppy disks and relics of the 1980s have no place in a world-class ATC system. This issue demands unyielding bipartisan support—a cause that transcends politics and unites us in pursuit of excellence. The new system will empower air traffic controllers with the tools they deserve, ensuring our skies are ready for the dawn of drones, advanced air mobility, and beyond.

Let us hope our leaders rise to this moment with courage and determination. Let us deliver an air traffic control system that inspires awe and confidence for generations to come. For our children and grandchildren, the miracle of flight should be a source of wonder, not worry. 

You can watch the full video of today’s announcement below.

Boeing Scores $13B Dreamliner Order for British Airways

International Airlines Group (IAG), the parent company of U.K. flag carrier British Airways, will purchase 32 Boeing 787-10 Dreamliners.  

The announcement, first teased by US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick during a White House press conference on Thursday, 8 May, comes as part of a broader bilateral trade deal unveiled by President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

The deal, worth nearly $13 billion (£9.8 billion), is a much-needed win for Boeing as it continues to recover from years of bad press and setbacks.

IAG and British Airways Bet Big on Long-Haul Demand

British Airways Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner in flight
British Airways Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner in flight | IMAGE: British Airways

British Airways, part of IAG, is investing heavily in long-haul travel despite a recent dip in transatlantic demand. The Dreamliner deal also includes options for 10 more. Unrelated to the Dreamliner deal, IAH says British Airways will also acquire six Boeing 777-9s and six Airbus A350-1000s.

IAG, which also owns Iberia, Aer Lingus, and Spanish carriers Vueling and LEVEL, will purchase 21 Airbus A330-900neo aircraft with options for 13 additional units, valued at $8 billion, to strengthen the long-haul fleets of Iberia, LEVEL, and Aer Lingus.

British Airways, operating 294 aircraft to over 200 destinations, has a long history with Boeing, having flown nearly every Boeing model except the 707 and 727. Despite softer demand in the U.S. economy leisure segment, IAG reports strong North Atlantic premium product demand and maintains its 2025 forecast.

The British Airways Dreamliners will use General Electric engines, while Rolls-Royce engines will power the A330-900neos.

Secretary Lutnick also announced that the US would allow tariff-free imports of Rolls-Royce engines as part of the U.K.-US trade deal, though this does not affect the Dreamliner order. Deliveries are scheduled between 2028 and 2033, assuming no geopolitical or other delays exacerbate existing backlogs at Boeing and Airbus.

Boeing’s Very Good Day

Boeing rendering of a 777-9 and 777-8F in China Airlines livery
Boeing rendering of a 777-9 and 777-8F in China Airlines livery | IMAGE: Boeing

Meanwhile, Boeing’s having a banner day. In a separate announcement, China Airlines confirmed it’s joining the 777X club with an order for ten 777-9 passenger jets and four 777-8F freighters, plus options for five more 777-9s and four 777-8Fs.

The Taiwanese carrier says the jets, including the 777-9—the world’s largest twin-engine jet—will boost capacity and range on long-haul routes to North America and Europe while slashing fuel consumption by 20%. With a max capacity of 426 passengers, these jets will be workhorses for China Airlines.

Boeing notes that over 520 777X jets have been ordered worldwide, signaling strong demand for the next-gen widebody.

Fierce Opposition: Allegiant Pilots Push Back on Viva’s Job-Threatening Alliance

Allegiant pilots recently issued a statement regarding negotiations between Las Vegas-based Allegiant Air and Mexican ultra low-cost carrier Viva (fka Viva Aerobus).

A union representing Allegiant pilots fears that a partnership would lead to significant layoffs, with Viva pilots taking over positions on Allegiant flights.

The two low-cost carriers have been discussing a partnership since 2021. Since then, however, there have been a number of significant setbacks, including the change of administrations following the 2024 US presidential election.

Allegiant Union: Our Pilots and Customers Deserve Better

Allegiant Airlines teamsters published a press release in late April strongly opposing a possible partnership between their airline and Viva.

According to the release, Allegiant is seeking government approval for the new partnership. The release’s primary concern is the possibility of giving ‘the majority of jobs and flying hours to Mexican crews with Viva’ at the chagrin of 1,400 Allegiant pilots within Teamsters Local 2118.

Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien didn’t hold his feelings back during the press release, calling the proposed partnership ‘un-American.’

We see Allegiant’s proposal for what it is –– a shameless attempt to lower our members’ standard of living, all to enrich Allegiant’s greedy executives…Allegiant pilots and customers deserve better than this carrier’s disrespect.’

Viva and Allegiant Pilots story
Image: By NS777 from Wikimedia Commons

Teamsters Local 2118 Negotiations Chairman Captain Josh Alen also described what the airline would be like under a partnership with Viva:

‘While we support the development of new routes and business for Allegiant, their application with Viva Aerobus will kill American jobs and set a dangerous precedent in the airline industry…It is extremely insulting that Allegiant would threaten to outsource our work in the middle of contract negotiations. We will not rest until Allegiant recognizes the value we provide and protects our work here in the United States.’

Airlines in a Three-Year Struggle

Allegiant and Viva have been discussing a ‘trade alliance agreement’ since December 2021. The agreement would expand the networks of both airlines, and Allegiant would pledge $50 million in equity into its equivalent south of the border.

The agreement has been waiting for regulatory approval for years, and Teamsters Local 2118 requests that the Trump administration deny the motion for approval. Allegiant contacted the US Department of Transportation (DOT) on 4 April, requesting that it approve the motion.

An Allegiant spokesperson responded to questions from the media about the proposed partnership, saying:.

‘This alliance, if approved, will provide tremendous benefits to consumers seeking affordable, nonstop travel between the U.S. and Mexico…Allegiant currently doesn’t provide transborder flying, so this is an opportunity to expand our service into Mexico while giving our pilots a chance to fly new routes that are not otherwise available to them at this time.’

Allegiant pilots push back on proposed Viva partnership
Allegiant’s brand new Boeing 737 MAX 8 | IMAGE: planespotters.net

The spokesperson also emphasized that pilots from Mexico are forbidden to operate U.S. domestic flights.

About Viva

Based on passenger numbers, Viva is Mexico’s third-largest airline and the 11th largest in North America. The carrier is located at Monterey International Airport in Apodaca, Nuevo León, Mexico. Launching in 2006 as Viva Aerobus, the carrier rebranded to simply ‘Viva,’ in October 2024.

Viva operates an all-Airbus fleet of 115 aircraft in the A320 and A321 families. The carrier serves 60 destinations across Mexico, the United States, Central America, and South America.

Within the United States, Viva serves:

  • Austin, TX (AUS)
  • Chicago (ORD)
  • Cincinnati (CVG)
  • Columbus, OH (CMH)
  • Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW)
  • Denver (DEN)
  • Houston (IAH)
  • Las Vegas (LAS)
  • Los Angeles (LAX)
  • Memphis (MEM)
  • Miami (MIA)
  • Nashville (BNA)
  • New York (JFK)
  • Oakland (OAK)
  • Orlando (MCO)
  • San Antonio (SAT)
  • San Diego (SAN)

Viva added seven new routes between the US and Mexico City’s new Felipe Ángeles International Airport (NLU) last month.

Innovative Ideas for Testing and Maintenance at Edwards AFB Spark Tank

0

Innovative ideas for aircraft testing and maintenance were some of the key projects presented at the “Spark Tank” competition finals held on 22 November 2024 at Edwards Air Force Base.

The 412th Test Wing Continuous Improvement and Innovation Team at Edwards sponsored the competition, encouraging base personnel to present innovative concepts using digital tools.

“It’s all about figuring out how to do something in an innovative way that no one’s ever done before,” said Dr. Donald Waters, Engineering Director of the 412th Test Engineering Group at Edwards.

More than 300 Airmen and Civilians Submitted Ideas

Over 300 people, active duty and civilian, submitted projects, several of which directly applied to flight testing and maintenance operations. At the event, modeled after the “Shark Tank” television show, six finalists presented their ideas to a panel of judges from base leadership.

Wireless, 3D, and AI-Driven Scanner Makes Precise Files

One project with an innovative idea was “Artec Leo – Wireless and AI-Driven 3D Scanner,” by Adam Nevis. He explained how this device allows engineers and maintainers to scan parts while still installed on their machines. Nevis provided an example of a damaged part in a hangar gear motor. The Artec-Leo could operate wirelessly, scan the part, and create a CAD file. Then, a 3-D printer fabricated the part immediately when it would have taken eight weeks to order it.

Artec Leo Wireless scanner in a cockpit. | Image: Artec 3D
Artec Leo Wireless scanner in a cockpit. | Image: Artec 3D

Nevis also stated that the AI-driven scanner can produce accurate files with exact tolerances and thicknesses. The files work with 3D printers to produce temporary or permanent parts made from stainless steel or even carbon fiber.

An advantage of the Artec Leo is that it can create scans of discontinued items, extending the service life of equipment. Nevis did not mention using the scanner to make aircraft parts. However, even if they only use it for innovative ideas for hangars and other equipment, it will still help support efficient operations at military bases or airports.

Artec Leo 3D scanner one of the innovative ideas presented at the Spark Tank. | Image: Artec 3D
Artec Leo 3D scanner is one of the innovative ideas presented at the Spark Tank. | Image: Artec 3D

Tablets on Flightline for Test Data and Modifications

Another of the projects in the Spark Tank finals was “Digital T-2 Modifications on the Flightline” by Alex Ramirez. This system will assist with designing, fabricating, and maintaining modifications and test equipment. Personnel can use Surface Pro tablets to track and access flight-test data. This aviation innovation will be especially useful at Edwards, where testing is a key part of the mission.

Ordinarily, modification packages and operations books are kept in thick binders, some with hundreds of pages, which are not easy to use or efficient in the flightline environment. This T-2 system gives personnel immediate access to flight and testing data.

Tablets
Airmen checking a tablet at Edwards Air Force Base. | Image: U.S. Air Force

This system allows engineers to modify files digitally directly in response to test data. It also includes a function to allow people to sign maintenance documents at the aircraft instead of doing it later. Ramirez said this will reduce aircraft downtime and save engineers man hours.

This system differs from the E-tools system aircraft maintainers use for normal operations. The E-tools system allows maintainers to document when they complete work orders. It also gives them access to digital versions of technical manuals, which is more efficient than searching paper versions for sections they need to perform maintenance. The T-2 system at Edwards will be different. Engineers will use it for testing and modifications instead of regular maintenance.

Auto Crib Provides Near-Instant Access to Bench Stock Items

A third project offering support to aircraft maintainers was “Modernizing Supply Bench Stock” from Staff Sgt. Victor Garcia of the 411th AMU Raptor Squadron at Edwards proposed that the base adopt the Auto Crib system to digitize and improve the bench stock system. Bench stock items can include pins, clips, nuts, bolts, safety wire, lubricants, washers, gaskets, and more. Maintainers often need quick access to items like this.

Auto Crib bench stock supply system one of the innovative ideas at the Spark Tank competition at Edwards AFB | Image: Autocrib
Auto Crib bench stock supply system one of the innovative ideas at the Spark Tank competition at Edwards AFB | Image: Autocrib

The Auto Crib system looks like a self-checkout unit or vending machine you might find in a convenience or grocery store. Personnel use a panel to locate and request any items they need. The machine opens a panel and provides the requested components within seven seconds.

This basic system can hold 2574 customizable bins containing items specific to aircraft models. Auto Crib can also expand the basic units with more bins. It allows returns, automatically generates purchase orders, and reorders inventory items when stock runs below pre-established levels.

Auto Crib control panel | Image: Autocrib
Auto Crib control panel | Image: Autocrib

The Air Logistics Complex at Warner Robins AFB already uses the Auto Crib system, which exemplifies its efficiency. If a bench stock item falls to an established level, then supplier Lockheed Martin is automatically tasked and has 24 hours to deliver the items to Robins. This failsafe feature keeps maintainers working and prevents work stoppages. Hill and Tinker Air Force Bases are also using Auto Crib.

Image showing bins inside Auto Crib system | Image: Auto Crib
Image showing bins inside Auto Crib system | Image: Auto Crib

Innovation to improve aircraft testing and maintenance

The innovative ideas presented at the Spark Tank competition promise to improve aircraft testing and maintenance.

“As we witness rapid advancements in digital capabilities, it is imperative that we harness the power of data to enhance our operations, improve efficiencies, and drive mission success,” said Rebecca Kern, the 412th Test Wing Innovation Project Officer.

PanAm A300 Preflight Safety Video Harkens Back To A Long Gone Era

“Be sure to extinguish your smoking materials before donning your oxygen mask.” – PanAm A300 Preflight Safety Video

That now quirky line from this PanAm A300 preflight safety video captured a bygone era of air travel. It sounds weird by today’s standards. Smoking has been banned from domestic flights since the late 1980s.

Pan Am, a legendary airline from the late 1920s to 1991, and the A300, Airbus’s first commercial success, evoke nostalgia for a time when flying was synonymous with glamor.

Pan Am Was A Legendary Airline That Shaped the Industry Even Today

Pan Am didn’t just operate flights—it transformed air travel. Through innovation and a relentless focus on passengers, it set standards that modern airlines still attempt to follow.

With a vast fleet and routes spanning the globe, Pan Am was a symbol of elegance and efficiency. Its commitment to excellence made it a household name.  The airline’s eventual downfall was both spectacular and a sad time for the airline industry.

Among its fleet was the Airbus A300, a milestone for a then-emerging little European-government funded manufacturer called Airbus.

Now the world’s leading aircraft builder, Airbus launched the A300 in the late 1970s as its first marketable airliner.

This twin-engine, wide-body jet was state-of-the-art at the time, attracting both European carriers and major U.S. airlines, including Pan Am. The A300 never really dominated its niche but it put Airbus on the map and was a key part of its strategy to penetrate the US market which it eventually accomplished.

Pan Am’s choice of the A300 over the Boeing 767 was strategic. Airbus, eager to penetrate the U.S. market, offered competitive pricing to secure Pan Am, a marquee client all while Pan Am needed to preserve capital.

The timing was ideal: Pan Am needed to simplify its aging, diverse fleet, and the A300 met that need. It modernized operations while upholding the airline’s reputation for quality. 

PanAm A300 preflight safety video features 1980s decor and instructions.

Safety First in this PanAm A300 Preflight Safety Video

The Pan Am A300 preflight safety video offers a vivid glimpse into 1980s aviation. With peach-colored seats, generous legroom, and flight attendants sporting Farrah Fawcett-inspired hairstyles, it’s a relic of a time when air travel felt luxurious.

The instruction to extinguish cigarettes before using an oxygen mask underscores how much has changed—smoking on flights is now unimaginable and look at that leg room even in coach!

Beyond its safety message, the video is a cultural artifact. Its grainy visuals and upbeat narration scream early ’80s charm, reflecting an era when Pan Am’s Clipper Class symbolized adventure.

Watching it today, readers are transported to a time when boarding a plane was an event, filled with anticipation and sophistication.

Here it is…The PanAm A300 preflight safety video is below:

Truman Carrier Loses Second Jet in a Week After Failed Landing

The USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier lost a second jet in a week yesterday, after a failed landing attempt.

Details are scarce, but Navy officials have confirmed the F/A-18F Super Hornet had a “failed arrestment”. Whatever the case, the jet went off the deck and to the bottom of the Red Sea.

IMG 7371
Navy photo, USS Harry S Truman aircraft carrier

Both crew on the jet ejected safely, and were recovered quickly with minor injuries.

Another jet fell overboard just a week ago

The incident is just the latest for the Truman. Just a week ago another F-18 fell off the side of the ship when the ship made an unexpected maneuver to avoid missile fire from Houthi rebels.

The jets cost $60-70 million each.

IMG 7368
An F/A-18E Super Hornet, attached to Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 81, prepares for launch on the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) during flight operations in the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility (Navy photo)

Crews involved with that incident also got away with just minor injuries.

Truman is Engaged in Operation Rough Rider

Truman and the greater Carrier Air Wing 1 have been in the Red Sea since February. They have been busy, engaged in Operation Rough Rider, an intense campaign targeting Houthi rebels in Yemen to “restore freedom of navigation and American deterrence in the region,” according to U.S. Central Command (USCENTCOM). The Houthis are backed by Iran.

Thus far, forces have struck over 800 targets, killing hundreds of Houthi fighters and many of their leaders. Multiple command-and-control facilities have been taken out, along with air defense systems, advanced weapons manufacturing facilities, and advanced weapons storage locations.

IMG 9535
F-18 taking off from the carrier (Mike Killian photo)

President Trump is Discussing Stand-Down with Houthis

On Tuesday (May 6), President Trump said American forces will stop attacking Houthi targets, claiming they have agreed to a stand-down.

Houthi officials, however, responded by saying they haven’t agreed to anything yet, but they are considering it.

Air Koryo is North Korea’s Only Airline. What’s it Like?

Air Koryo, North Korea’s state-owned (and only) airline, is a unique relic of Cold War aviation.

Shaped by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s state control, isolation, and geopolitical alignments, Air Koryo has a history of over seven decades, starting as a Soviet-backed venture and operating today as a symbol of the DPRK regime.

What’s it like to fly on Air Koryo? You may never find out personally, but others have and lived to tell the tale. Here’s a history and rundown of North Korea’s flag carrier, Air Koryo.

There are Six Aircraft in Air Koryo’s Fleet

Since Kim Jong Un assumed power in 2011, Air Koryo has experienced some modernization in its operations but maintains its status as a product of state propaganda and diplomacy.

Currently, there are only six aircraft in its fleet. The average age of each plane is just under 30 years old. They are as follows:

  • Ilyushin Il-62M—This jet aircraft is operated by the Government of North Korea and is used as Kim’s VIP jet. In totalitarian dictatorship fashion, he has two, meaning he hoards 1/3 of all aircraft in the nation, all to himself and his inner circle. It can seat nearly 200 passengers.
  • Antonov An-148-100B—This mid-sized regional jet airliner seats 62. The airline has two of these aircraft, both of which were delivered in 2013.
  • Tupolev Tu-204-100B—A commercial twin-engined jet aircraft that seats up to 210 passengers. The lone 204 was once owned by Russian regional carrier Red Wings Airlines.
  • Tupolev Tu-204-300—A slightly smaller variant of the 204-100B, this aircraft has 166 passenger seats. Not much is known about the jet’s history, except that it was modified from a Tu-204-100.
Ilyushin Il 18 Air Koryo
Image: By Stefan Krasowski from Wikimedia Commons

The Tupelov jets are the only ones that are approved by the European Union to fly in Europe. The other planes are banned for being too old, and thus obsolete and unsafe to be trusted with passengers.

Air Koryo’s Network

In an effort to attract tourists, Kim also overhauled Pyongyang’s Sunan International Airport (FNJ) in 2015. The airport, however, doesn’t get a lot of traffic, largely because of a major disinterest among travelers and the airline’s limited route network.

Throughout Air Koryo’s history, the airline has flown to various destinations throughout Asia and Europe. Today, there are just four destinations, including the airline’s hub in Pyongyang. The other three are Beijing Capital International Airport (PEK) in China, Shenyang Taoxian International Airport (SHE) in China, and Vladivostok International Airport (VVO) in Russia.

Since COVID-19, the airline has been run on a skeleton crew and only operates passenger flights a few times weekly. The airline relies on state subsidies, as profitability matters little to the government compared to its diplomatic and symbolic roles.

The Air Koryo Cabin Experience

While there are in-flight meals aboard Air Koryo, the main course is the Koryo Burger, which consists of a ‘mystery meat’. Those who have flown with the airline recall these burgers tasting processed, bland, and cold as if they just came out of the refrigerator.

Air Koryo Tupolev Tu 204 aisle
Image: By Topolinochamp from Wikimedia Commons

According to reviewers, there’s also in-flight entertainment on the overhead monitors, but one of a few different types of content will be playing: Air Koryo safety videos, DPRK-approved dramas, performances of lively girl groups like Moranbong that the DPRK formed to personally entertain Kim, and fluff documentaries of Kim. For news, passengers have access to the Pyongyang Times or a propaganda magazine.

Air Koryo is often one of the worst-reviewed airlines for passenger flights. However, many reviewers don’t blame the crew or flight attendants, as they’re often considered friendly and helpful.

Air Koryo’s Other Uses

When not used to fly passengers to and from Pyongyang, the aged aircraft are often used for charter services before and after special events set up by the DPRK. Such events include celebrating the anniversary of the DRPK, often carrying performers or workers. Air Koryo also transported athletes to and from Incheon, South Korea, for the 2014 Asian Games.

With Kim’s focus on nuclear ambitions, it’s uncertain if Air Koryo will ever stop being a state-funded symbol that will sever its Soviet-era ties and become a commercial entity. If you ever were interested in flying with Air Koryo, you’d easily see a glimpse into North Korea’s controlled and old-world civilization.

The Uniplan: An Aircraft So Odd, It Never Got Off the Ground

In 1911, French brothers Arthur-Édouard and Raoul-Georges Gonnel developed and tested the Uniplan: an aircraft design that can only be called strange.

Their “Uniplan” looked more like a kite than a plane. The Uniplan was not successful at flying, but it did demonstrate important aerodynamic concepts and principles that apply to modern piston and jet engine-powered aircraft today.

View of the front of the Gonnel Uniplan
View of the front of the Gonnel Uniplan, an aircraft design that did not work, even though its designers received a patent for it. | IMAGE: http://chezpeps.free.fr/

The Uniplan aircraft design featured an open fuselage, a compact engine mounted above a pair of wheels, and seating for a single pilot. Positioned above the lower fuselage was a boxlike frame of equal length, covered in fabric that draped down each side to form simple wings or fins.

Uniplan Aircraft Design Different and a Bit Strange

By any measure, the Uniplan was a unique aircraft design. Some claimed it was a cross between a covered wagon and a nun’s wimple [bonnet]. A 2010 edition of the Incas Bulletin refers to the Uniplan as the “strangeness” and “a kind of canvas boat rolled over the fuselage.”

Scale model of the Uniplan
Scale model of the Uniplan provides a clear view of the design. | IMAGE: Facebook.com

The Uniplan was 23 feet long and 10.8 feet high and featured a wingspan of 10.5 feet. Its maximum weight was about 600 pounds. It initially had a 28-horsepower 2-cylinder Velox-Suére engine. The Gonnels built an updated model with a new fuselage and larger 4-cylinder 50-horsepower Velox-Suére engine. The design also seemed to lack steering capability.

French Inventors Receive Patent for Their Idea

Despite the Uniplan’s unusual design, the brothers demonstrated their seriousness by securing a French patent in 1910. Still, they seemed to recognize early doubts about the aircraft’s performance. Their patent application noted that the fabric wing—or dome—might act like a parachute, acknowledging that “the lift in flying machines leaves much to be desired.”

They decided to test the Uniplan in March 1911 and hired a pilot with the last name “Pappaert” to fly it. He allegedly did not have an official pilot’s license, but that might not have mattered. There is no clear evidence that the design worked. A January 1912 issue of the French newspaper “L’Auto” reported that Pappaert made “many flights” in the Uniplan that January, but no other records of his alleged flights exist. Others claimed these flights were no more than uncontrolled hops.

Rear view of the Uniplan showing more detail on the upper fuselage
The rear view of the Uniplan shows more detail on the upper fuselage. | IMAGE: Secretprojects.co.uk

Aerodynamic limitations likely explain why the Uniplan failed to fly successfully. Its long, fabric-covered upper frame paired with very short wings reflects a low aspect ratio design—meaning the wings were relatively short in span compared to their length. This configuration tends to generate strong wingtip vortices and contributes to instability in flight. While some modern fighter jets also have low aspect ratios, they compensate with powerful engines that provide enough thrust to overcome these aerodynamic drawbacks.

French Design For Low Aspect Ratio Plane

French "Irreversible" designed by Camille Delaandre
French “Irreversible” designed by Camille Delaandre. | IMAGE: Secretprojects.co.uk

In the early 20th century, the Uniplan was not the only unique or unusual aircraft design with a low aspect ratio. In 1908, Frenchman Camille Delalandre designed the “Irreversible.” It was similar to the Uniplan and not any more successful. Delalandre tested it in June 1914, and it crashed. Then, when World War 1 began, he did not continue with the project.

Front view of the "Irreversible"
Front view of the “Irreversible” shows how it compares to the Gonnel Uniplan. | IMAGE: Secretprojects.co.uk

American Design Similar to French Uniplan

Patent diagram of the American Shillcutt low aspect-ratio plane. | Image: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/
Patent diagram of the American Shillcutt low aspect-ratio plane. | IMAGE:: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/

The French were not the only aircraft designers interested in low-aspect planes. In 1912, American Alburt Shillcutt designed his own aircraft, the “Shillcutt Aeroplane.” While similar in appearance to the Gonnel Uniplan design, Shilcutt’s plane had two engines that drove two propellers, one forward and one in the rear, on a single shaft. Like Gonnels, Shillcutt applied for and received a patent, number 1,043,473, in 2012. Unfortunately, like with the Gonnels and Delaandre, Shilcutt’s aircraft design was unsuccessful. There is no evidence that it ever went beyond model form.

Early image of the Shillcutt Aeroplane in flight
Early image of the Shillcutt Aeroplane in flight. | IMAGE: Smithsonianmag.com

While these low aspect ratio aircraft designs may not have been competent fliers, it does seem likely that they at least help engineers learn more about wing design and aerodynamics.

Contour, Spirit Team Up to Enhance Air Service to EAS Communities

On Monday, regional US carrier Contour Airlines unveiled a strategic partnership with ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC) Spirit Airlines. 

According to a press release from Contour Airlines, the move will open up new air service possibilities for underserved communities across the United States. This collaboration leverages Contour’s expertise as the nation’s second-largest Essential Air Service (EAS) carrier and Spirit’s ULCC model to deliver enhanced connectivity and affordable fares. 

Additionally, it signals a targeted effort to bridge gaps in the national air transportation network while capitalizing on both carriers’ strengths.

Strengthening EAS Communities with Enhanced Connectivity

Contour Airlines ERJ-135ER
A Contour Airlines Embraer ERJ-135ER | IMAGE: Contour Airlines

Smyrna, Tenn.-based Contour Airlines serves as a lifeline for smaller communities through its EAS operations. Serving 22 cities, Contour connects outposts like Altoona-Blair County Airport (AOO) in Pennsylvania, Taos Regional Airport (SKX) in New Mexico, and Kirksville Regional Airport (IRK) in Missouri to major hubs such as Charlotte (CLT), Chicago (ORD), Denver (DEN), Nashville (BNA), Phoenix (PHX), and Washington Dulles (IAD). Operating a fleet of 34 regional jets—12 Bombardier CRJ-100/200s and 22 Embraer ERJ-135/145s—Contour maintains its EAS commitments under US Department of Transportation contracts, providing subsidized air service to these underserved markets.

Under the new partnership, Contour will continue its EAS routes and interline operations with United, American, and Alaska Airlines, connecting travelers to larger hubs. In addition, Contour will provide ground handling services in its EAS cities and market Spirit flights. This operational model aims to boost passenger traffic in these airports by combining Contour’s regional expertise with Spirit’s expansive network reach.

Contour president Ben Munson touts the partnership as a win for travelers in the small communities his airline serves. 

“EAS communities no longer need to choose between national connectivity and low fares,” Munson said. “The combination of service from our two airlines is the best formula to grow passenger traffic in these underserved airports.”

Spirit’s Low-Cost Expansion into Underserved Markets

Spirit Airlines Airbus A321neo
A Spirit Airlines Airbus A321neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines

Spirit Airlines, fresh from emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in March 2025 and with a new CEO at the helm, sees the partnership as a strategic opportunity to expand its footprint into new markets. Operating a fleet of 194 narrowbody Airbus aircraft to 91 destinations across the US, Latin America, and the Caribbean, Spirit is no stranger to the ULCC model.

The Dania Beach, Fla.-based airline plans to launch leisure-focused routes from select Contour EAS markets, presumably mirroring the successful strategies of competitors like Breeze Airways and Avelo Airlines. While specific route announcements aren’t expected before summer, the move suggests Spirit’s intent to tap into demand for affordable vacation travel from smaller communities.
John Kirby, Vice President of Network Planning at Spirit Airlines, emphasized the partnership’s potential.  

“Our new partnership with Contour gives us an exciting opportunity to grow our network and explore low-cost entry into new markets that currently have limited service,” said Kirby. 

In recent years, Spirit has been a target for acquisition, with failed attempts by JetBlue and Frontier. Spirit now drives its post-bankruptcy strategy by prioritizing high-value, low-cost service while exploring growth opportunities. 

An Airbus is Not a Regional Jet

Contour Airlines ERJ-135
A Contour Airlines Embraer ERJ-135 | IMAGE: Contour Airlines

Founded in 2016 as the regional airline arm of Contour Aviation, Contour has grown from its roots as Corporate Flight Management, a private jet charter company established in 1982. Today, Contour Aviation is a multifaceted operation encompassing aircraft sales, maintenance, FBO services, and a robust Part 135 charter business. 

Its EAS operations have made it a recognizable player in the regional aviation industry in the southeast US and beyond—meanwhile, Spirit’s 45-year history and recent financial restructuring position it to explore new market opportunities.

The Contour-Spirit partnership strategically tackles the ongoing challenge of balancing affordability and connectivity in underserved regions like Taos, Kirksville, and Altoona. By integrating Contour’s regional jet operations with Spirit’s leisure-focused ULCC model, the alliance aims to provide flexible, cost-effective travel options for communities previously overlooked by major carriers.

Skeptics question whether these markets can sustain the anticipated demand. There is, after all, quite a difference between a 30-seat regional seat and a 182-seat Airbus A320. Can Taos, with its 6,400 residents, fill multiple weekly Airbus flights to Las Vegas? Or will Beckley, West Virginia, population 16,600, support flights to Orlando? While these examples are hypothetical, of course, they highlight critical considerations for the partnership’s success.

This collaboration promises to be a compelling case study, and we will be closely monitoring its outcomes.

How a Disastrous Botched Landing Cost Emirates $7K Per Passenger

This botched landing became one of the most infamous incidents in Emirates’ history.

The 3 August 2016 incident from the Middle East’s largest airline resulted in a destroyed Boeing 777-300ER and the death of one firefighter.

After the crash landing, Emirates would revamp its safety training and improvements, but memories like this can last a lifetime. Here’s the story of Emirates Flight 521.

‘There Was Smoke Coming Out of the Cabin’

Emirates Flight 521 attempted to land at 1244 local time at Runway 12L at Dubai International Airport (DXB) in the United Arab Emirates. Two hundred eighty-two passengers and 18 crew members were arriving from Trivandrum International Airport (TRV) in Thiruvananthapuram, India.

The captain was an anonymous 34-year-old Emirati who had been with the airline since 2001. His first officer, Jeremy Webb from Australia, was 37 and joined the airline in 2014.

Prior to landing in Dubai, the crew received a wind shear warning from a local airport ATC. Wind shear is an abrupt change in wind speed and direction.

The Boeing 777 touched down 1,100 meters beyond Runway 12L’s threshold, well beyond the optimal zone. A ‘LONG LANDING’ warning triggered inside the cockpit. The pilots opted to abort the landing, but critical mistakes followed.

As the landing gear began to retract, the engines failed to spool up in time since the auto-throttle didn’t properly engage after touchdown. Failing to climb again, the aircraft dropped back down to the Earth and skidded 800 meters towards the end of the runway.

Emirates Boeing 777 following the Flight 521 botched landing.
Image: EPA

One of the fuel tanks ruptured during the botched landing, causing an explosion and engulfing the plane in flames.

One of the passengers Sharon Maryam Sharji recalled the events to Reuters:

‘It was actually really terrifying. As we were landing, there was smoke coming out in the cabin…People were screaming, and we had a very hard landing. We left by going down the emergency slides, and as we were leaving on the runway, we could see the whole plane catch fire. It was horrifying.’

A Successful Escape

Evacuation began at once, with 10 of 11 escape slides deploying successfully. All passengers and crew exited within 90 seconds. Thirty-nine injuries were reported, including impact injuries and burns from the failed landing. Four people sustained serious injuries but have since recovered.

Jassim Essa Al-Baloushi, a 27-year-old firefighter assigned to douse the Boeing’s flames, unfortunately died on the job.

The crash caused several hours of delays for outgoing flights at DXB. Flights en route to DXB diverted to nearby airports.

Eight days after the botched landing, Emirates offered $7,000 to each passenger on board, which covered injuries and luggage loss. That’s a total of $1,974,000 split among 282 passengers. The flight’s airfares were also reportedly refunded.

DXB reportedly lost $1 million per minute as it closed due to the crash.

A Three-Year Investigation

The UAE General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA), associated with Rolls-Royce and Boeing, led a meticulous investigation, releasing its final report published on 6 February 2020. The report identifies a total of two causes of the botched landing:

  1. The pilots failed to increase the engine thrust soon enough.
  2. The pilots failed to observe the flight instrumentation parameters.

The report also concluded with the following:

‘The flight crew reliance on automation and lack of training in flying go-arounds from close to the runway significantly affected the flight crew performance in a critical flight situation which was different to that experienced by them during their simulated training flights.’

Boeing 777 31HER A6 EGU 06
Image: By Frank Schwichtenberg from Wikimedia Commons

The report prompted Emirates to revise its pilot training regimen, focusing on go-around procedures, manual flying skills, and automation management.

Following the investigation, what happened to Flight 521’s pilots is unknown. The crash, however, didn’t threaten Emirates’ operations, as it continues to have strong financial backing and government support.

Pan Am Is Back For A Limited Time Only

Pan Am is back this summer with a luxurious, private jet expedition for the ages. 

In June 2024, we first told you about the exciting revival of Pan Am’s legacy with a luxury private jet journey. With the expedition set to take flight next month, the details for the journey are now finalized. And, if you’re worried that you may have missed out on this opportunity, there’s good news! At the time of this writing, some spots are still available–for a pretty penny (more on that below).  

This officially licensed Pan Am Brands experience, organized by Criterion Travel in Beaverton, Oregon, in collaboration with U.K.-based luxury travel company Bartelings, Pan American World Airways, and the Pan Am Museum Foundation, promises to transport participants back to the golden age of air travel. 

With its iconic blue and white “Blue Meatball” logo symbolizing a bygone era of elegance and class, Pan Am’s spirit comes alive in this 12-day adventure.  

“Tracing the Transatlantic”: A Historic Itinerary

Pan Am is back.  Here is its historic Southern Route that the limited time only airline will retrace.
“Retracing the Atlantic” will follow Pan Am’s historic Southern Route | IMAGE: Criterion Travel

Set for 16-28 June 2025, this incredible journey recreates Pan Am’s transatlantic services that launched in June 1939.

Pan Am’s “flying boats” operated a Northern Route (New York to London via Newfoundland) and a Southern Route (New York to Marseilles, France via Bermuda, the Azores, and Lisbon, Portugal). The itinerary honors the airline’s historic Southern Route, starting and ending at New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)—Pan Am’s primary hub and home to the landmark Worldport terminal. Destinations include:

  • Bermuda 
  • Lisbon, Portugal
  • Marseille, France 
  • London, England
  • Foynes and Shannon, Ireland: A nod to the Northern Route’s stop in Foynes, with a visit to the Foynes Flying Boat & Maritime Museum, home to the world’s only full-size replica of a Boeing 314 Yankee Clipper.
  • New York: Begin and end the journey at JFK.

According to organizers, most flight segments range from one to 5.5 hours. As a private jet operation, passengers will enjoy access to private terminals for easy customs, security, and immigration processes.

The Aircraft: Modern Luxury Signifies Pan Am Is Back For Guests

Recreating Pan Am's iconic serice
Passengers will enjoy Pan Am’s iconic service on board a private Boeing 757 | IMAGE: Criterion Travel

The journey takes place aboard a privately chartered Boeing 757-200, configured with 50 lie-flat, business-class seats in a 2-2 layout. “Buddy” seats are scattered throughout the cabin to encourage dining and socializing, echoing the convivial atmosphere of Pan Am’s golden era. 

The onboard experience is designed to replicate Pan Am’s legendary service. It features upscale catering, an open bar, and the legendary airline’s unmistakable branding on everything from glassware to swag. 

The expedition is limited to 50 (incredibly) lucky passengers. With just 50 people on board an aircraft designed to hold up to 239 passengers, this will guarantee a high-touch, personalized experience that oozes nostalgia while prioritizing comfort.

Private Boeing 757-200 interior
The Boeing 757-200 will feature 50 business-class seats in a 2-2 configuration | IMAGE: Criterion TravelP

Pan Am Is Back: Guided by a Pan Am Fan

Pan Am 747
Pan Am Boeing 747 N739PA, “Clipper Morning Light,” being towed in the early 1970s. Later renamed “Clipper Maid of the Seas,” this aircraft tragically operated Flight 103 | IMAGE: Pan Am Museum Foundation

Craig Carter, CEO of Pan American World Airways and owner of Pan Am Brands, will host the trip, bringing Pan Am’s history to life. Tasked with keeping the airline’s spirit alive, Carter will share insights into Pan Am’s remarkable past, its place in today’s aviation landscape, and plans for the brand’s future. 

He emphasizes the journey’s goal: to let travelers “revel in the glamor and nostalgia of our efforts to honor Pan Am’s legacy, with high-end service, stays at top hotels, fascinating destinations, reminisces of Pan Am’s glory days, and iconic Pan Am design, logos, and identity popping up throughout.” 

Carter also hints at more themed adventures, including an exclusive around-the-world private jet trip planned for Pan Am’s 100th anniversary in 2027.

A Complete Luxury Experience

Pan Am Worldport terminal at JFK
The Pan American Worldport Terminal at Idlewide/JFK in 1963 | Pan Am Museum Foundation

Such a grand adventure does not come without an exorbitant price tag. At $59,950 per person for double occupancy or $65,500 for single occupancy, the cost covers 12 nights in deluxe hotels, all meals, guided excursions, gratuities, onboard bar service, and exclusive Pan Am-branded swag.

Travelers will stay at top-tier properties and enjoy curated experiences, such as the Foynes museum visit, highlighting Pan Am’s contributions to aviation. Every nostalgic detail is meant to hearken back to the golden age of travel, highlighting Pan Am’s iconic aesthetic and commitment to class and elegance. 

They Don’t Make Them Like Pan Am Anymore

Pan American Airways Boeing 314
“Dixie Clipper” completes its inaugural transatlantic flight, landing in Lisbon, Portugal, on 29 June 1939 | IMAGE: Pan Am Museum Foundation

Founded in 1927 by Juan T. Trippe as Pan American Airways, Pan Am began as a scheduled airmail and passenger service between Key West, Florida, and Havana, Cuba.

Trippe’s vision transformed it into an aviation empire, operating as the unofficial U.S. flag carrier through much of the 20th century. Pan Am was a pioneer of firsts: the first airline to fly transatlantic, transpacific, and worldwide routes, the first to operate the Boeing 707, the first to fly the 747, and the first to introduce computerized reservation systems.

Its early fleet of Boeing 314 flying boats, designed for water landings before long runways were standard, epitomized luxury and innovation.

At its peak, Pan Am’s fleet of 226 aircraft served 87 cities across every continent except Antarctica. However, challenges for the storied carrier began in the mid-1970s. Struggles continued throughout the 1980s, including the 1988 Lockerbie bombing of Flight 103, culminating in its bankruptcy in 1991 and, ultimately, its collapse on 4 December 1991. 

Today, the Pan Am Museum Foundation and Pan Am Brands keep its legacy alive, and this journey is a testament to their efforts.

Celebrate the Airline that Defined an Era

Pan Am Boeing 707
IMAGE: Pan Am Brands

Pan Am is a brand that represents a still unmatched standard of quality and elegance in the skies. 

This journey is more than a luxury trip—it’s a chance to connect with Pan Am’s transformative impact on the industry. From pioneering global routes to setting service standards, Pan Am laid the foundation for modern air travel.

“Tracing the Transatlantic” offers a rare opportunity to experience that legacy firsthand, with high-end service and historic destinations that resonate deeply with those who know the industry’s inner workings. 

We are excited (and a little bit jealous) of the 50 lucky people who will experience this beautiful tribute to Pan Am’s enduring legacy, bringing the elegance of the “Blue Meatball” back to the skies. 

For those who live and breathe aviation, this experience is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to step into history while celebrating the airline that defined an era.

SeaPort Airlines: The Oregon Airline That Couldn’t Keep Its Pilots

From 2008 to 2017, SeaPort Airlines operated out of Portland, Oregon, carving a unique niche in the Pacific Northwest.

Unlike traditional commercial carriers, SeaPort functioned as a feeder airline, linking small, rural communities often overlooked by major airlines. Despite early promise and bold ambitions, operational challenges and bankruptcy halted its journey.

Here’s how SeaPort Airlines came to be and the challenges that ultimately led to its downfall.

SeaPort Takes Off

SeaPort Airlines began operations on 30 June 2008 under CEO Kent Craford and Chairman John Beardsley. The airline’s name was derived from the names of its first two destinations: Seattle, Washington, and Portland, Oregon.

Seaport set up a base at Portland International Airport (PDX), initially operating to and from King County International Airport/Boeing Field (BFI) in Seattle. Flights lasted 90 minutes, cutting travel time in half compared to driving or taking a bus.

The airline launched with three Pilatus PC-12 turboprop aircraft, each accommodating up to nine passengers. Rather than arrive 90 minutes before a commercial flight, passengers could arrive 15 minutes before a SeaPort flight and skip any security checks or other screenings. There were no crowds at Boeing Field, and parking was also free.

The press and public immediately saw the airline’s appeal, which was marketed towards travelers who wanted to buy time.

“I have two kids at home. I don’t want to waste a single minute at the airport,” Slalom Consulting GM and passenger Kory Kimball put bluntly.

One-way fares cost $99, and round-trip fares cost $149. One caveat, however, was that each passenger could only take 35 pounds of luggage.

SeaPort Airlines Pilatus PC-12
A SeaPort Airlines Pilatus PC-12 | Image: By Lazyhawk from Wikimedia Commons

SeaPort Airlines Goes Mid-South

On 21 October 2008, SeaPort Airlines announced Pendleton, Oregon, as its third destination. The airline received a two-year Essential Air Service (EAS) grant to manage a route between PDX and Eastern Oregon Regional Airport (PDT). PDT operations launched on 1 December of that year.

In 2009, the airline had big plans to expand but also made a major change in management for unknown reasons. In November of that year, SeaPort’s board of directors voted to oust Craford and replace him as CEO with Beardsley.

The previous month, Beardsley’s other company, Historic U.S. National Bank Block, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The change in leadership, however, was said not to affect SeaPort’s bottom line, as it was making profits and looking to fly to more destinations.

In the Spring of 2010, the airline received a two-year EAS contract to operate routes across various cities throughout the United States. SeaPort’s new routes included:

  • Salina Regional Airport (SLN) in Salina, Kansas, to Kansas City International Airport (MCI)
  • Boone County Regional Airport (HRO) in Harrison, Arkansas, to MCI
  • Memorial Field Airport (HOT) in Hot Springs, Arkansas, to Memphis International Airport (MEM)

Each route had one daily flight from Sunday through Friday. While the airline continued its original PDX-BFI route, its identity became a feeder airline that helped travelers connect to larger commercial flights.

In July 2011, SeaPort added two more routes to its network: Dallas Love Field (DAL) to South Arkansas Regional Airport (ELD) in El Dorado, Arkansas, and DAL-HOT.

SeaPort Faces Challenges

The airline established a regional base at MEM in 2012 to better manage its Mid-South network. The following year, it received EAS contracts totaling over $13 million. These new contracts, however, took it to Southern California, where it would open up routes to San Diego, Burbank, Visalia, and El Centro.

Through 2014, SeaPort Airlines further bolstered its Mid-South network with contracts for Wichita and Great Bend, Kansas; Nashville, Tennessee; Tupelo, Mississippi; and Muscle Shoals, Alabama. Its first and only international destination was San Felipe, Mexico.

Things began to go downhill for SeaPort in 2015, as the airline lost several contracts to competitors. This was a blow for the airline, as it relied on these contracts for its finances. A pilot shortage was why EAS opted to cancel or not renew its SeaPort contracts.

SeaPort Airlines would later cease many more routes in mid-January 2016, followed by closing a North Bend, Washington route. SeaPort Executive Vice President Tom Sieber told the Salina Journal that the airline had only 17 pilots when it needed 54. Many of SeaPort’s pilots would get poached by larger airlines with better pay and incentives, according to Sieber.

The airline filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection the following month while continuing to operate its remaining routes. Chapter 11 would then convert into Chapter 7 liquidation on 20 September 2016, with its Arkansas and Pacific Northwest networks being the last to close with a small number of Cessna 208 Caravans.