Trending — Page 14 Of 223

-

May 15, 2025

Bonanza Air Lines: The Forgotten Desert Airline that Quietly Shaped 1960s Aviation

Phoenix, Arizona is the fifth-most populated city in America, so it would only make sense for the city to start its own major airline. That it certainly did around the mid-20th century.

The company had quite a pioneer on its hands for a while, until the late 1960s when competition swallowed it up when it was still growing.

Bonanza Air Lines was known for being the first airline in America to comprise its entire fleet of jets in 1960. Bonanza also expanded its network to include smaller cities in the West, providing more options for consumers than rival airlines at the time.

Here is the story of Bonanza Air Lines.

(Vegas) Aces High

Bonanza Air Service was created in Las Vegas, Nevada, by former Navy Lieutenant Commander Edmund Converse and charter pilot Charles Keene.

Its first year in business was 1945 when it operated as a charter service with a lone Cessna four-seater. A year later, it added another plane, the Douglas C-47, and began conducting intrastate flights between Reno and Las Vegas, Nevada.

The year 1949 saw Bonanza’s first major flight expansion by making its first out-of-state destination to Phoenix. The Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) approved Bonanza for airline certification to make this route possible. Along the way, the plane would make stops in various towns and cities in Nevada and Arizona.

Bonanza’s route map grew throughout the 1950s, with the airline now offering flights to and from Los Angeles, California, and Salt Lake City, Utah. Bonanza’s fleet also received new modern additions, the Douglas DC-9 and Fairchild F-27.

Bonanza Air Lines Fairchild F-27 — Image: By Jon Proctor from Wikimedia Commons

In 1962, Bonanza was looking to add more impressive additions to its fleet, this time from across the pond. The airline ordered BAC One-Eleven jets from the British Aircraft Corporation. However, BAC blocked this transaction. Bonanza then stuck with American aircraft and ordered the new Douglas DC-9 series 10.

Deadly Crash of Bonanza Air Lines Flight 114 and Merger

The airline experienced a horrific accident in 1964. On 15 November, BAL Flight 114 failed to land at McCarran International Airport, flying into a mountainside during stormy weather. The crash killed all 26 passengers and three crew members on board. Flight 114 was the only catastrophe in the airline’s history.

Bonanza officially relocated its headquarters two years later to Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX). The City of Phoenix allowed the airline to build a larger headquarters and an upgraded hangar at the Sky Harbor. The new facilities opened on 25 June of that year.

By 1968, Bonanza officially went international, with a route connecting Phoenix to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. The flight would also make stops in Mazatlan and La Paz, Mexico, in addition to Tucson, Arizona.

Despite the airline’s fascinating growth, Bonanza’s brass agreed to merge with Pacific Air Lines and West Coast Airlines. The three carriers became Air West on 17 April 1968.

In 1970, Hollywood film producer Howard Hughes purchased Air West for $90 million and later renamed it Hughes Airwest. By 1980, Hughes Airwest faced a strike, citing that agents and office workers had been working without contracts.

The strike was resolved, but it wasn’t much longer until Hughes Airwest would be absorbed by Republic Airlines. The deal was worth $38.5 million. Two more mergers occurred throughout history, leading the remnants of Bonanza to be found under the Delta portfolio in 2010.

England vs. Germany: A Tale of Two 24-Cylinder Engines

-

May 15, 2025

England vs. Germany: A Tale of Two 24-Cylinder Engines

During World War II, Great Britain and Germany deployed powerful 24-cylinder engines for their aircraft.

Both nations began working on the engines before the war started. Ultimately, the British proved more successful with their Napier Sabre engine over the German Junkers Jumo 222.

British Napier Sabre 24-Cylinder Engine

Great Britain first considered developing the 24-cylinder Napier Sabre engine in 1937. The Napier & Son manufacturer had been making engines since 1917, during The First World War, when they produced the Napier Lion, a 12-cylinder motor they produced until 1943. Engine designer Frank Hord theorized that an engine with more, smaller cylinders would be more powerful than one with fewer, larger cylinders.

The Napier Sabre 24-cylinder engine on a test stand. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The Napier Sabre essentially consisted of four 6-cylinder engines geared together with twin crankshafts into a single output shaft. It was liquid-cooled and had a new system of sleeve valves instead of poppet valves used on most other engines. The sleeve valves made the Napier Sabre more powerful and fuel-efficient. Napier first tested it in January 1938 at 1350 horsepower, and by that summer, it was putting out 2200 and 2400 by the end of that year.

British Speed Engine Production as War Begins

Following the successful 100-hour testing of the 24-cylinder engine, the British rushed it into production at the beginning of the war. They installed it into the Hawker Tempest V, Typhoon 1, and 1B fighters and the Folland Fo. 108 fighter.

Among 24-cylinder engines was the Napier Sabre Engine, which powered the Hawker Typhoon Fighter — The Napier Sabre Engine powered the Hawker Typhoon Fighter. | Image: Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The powerful engine gave the fighters outstanding low-altitude performance. The Napier Sabre was the fastest Allied engine, giving aircraft more speed than the 12-cylinder engines in British Spitfire fighters.

Manufacturing and Performance Problems with Napier Sabre

Despite its performance, the Napier Sabre had significant problems and drew complaints from pilots and maintenance crews. Some of these issues were manufacturing errors, with bits of metal left inside engines, often resulting in broken piston components. Crews also experienced oil overheating and engine seizures.

Image Demonstrating the Size of the Massive British Engine. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

Although the engine was effective at low altitudes, it was not strong enough above 20,000 feet. In 1942, Napier started working on a supercharger to provide better high-altitude performance. However, the company was sold to English Electric. They gave up on the supercharger but improved the engine’s reliability, extending its time between overhauls from 25 to 250 hours.

Another problem occurred in 1944 during operations at Normandy. The 24-cylinder engines were sucking airborne sand, which grounded the planes until new air filters could arrive more than a week later.

Napier Sabre 24-Cylinder Engines Effective in Combat

The Napier Sabre 24-cylinder engine was effective against German aircraft throughout the war. The Typhoons became the fastest low-altitude aircraft and were especially successful at attacking German V1 bombs.

Another view of the Napier Sabre Engine, one of England's 24-cylinder engines used in World War II — Another view of the Napier Sabre Engine. | Image: airandspace.si.edu

As the war progressed, the British wanted to increase the power of their engines. Napier considered using water and methane injection to raise the Sabre’s output to 3000 horsepower. They even experimented with a 32-cylinder version, which they hoped would produce 4000 horsepower. It did not make it into production.

German Jumo-222 24-Cylinder Engine

Before and during World War II, the Germans worked on their own 24-cylinder engine, the Junkers Jumo 222. In 1936, the German Air Ministry (RLM) decided they needed an 1800-horsepower engine for the bombers in development. Ferdinand Brandner joined Junkers and took charge of the project. He set an initial goal to build a new 2000-horsepower engine and named it Jumo 222. They finalized the initial design in 1937.

The Junkers Jumo 222, one of the 24-cylinder engines used by England in World War II — Side View of the Junkers Jumo 222 24-Cylinder Engine. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

The plan was for the Jumo 222 to power the Junkers Ju 88 bomber. During the Second World War, Junkers was the only Axis company building both aircraft and engines, something that would contribute to its eventual failure.

The Jumo 222 was a liquid-cooled, radial, 24-cylinder engine. It had six-cylinder banks with four cylinders each, positioned around the crankcase in a hexagonal pattern. As the months progressed, the Germans continually increased their requirements for power output from the Jumo 222.

Germans Planned to Use Jumo 222 Engine in New Bomber

Along with the Ju 88 bomber, the Germans were developing a new high-speed medium bomber, the “Bomber B.” They expected it to carry a 4410-pound bomb load, 2,237 miles, at about 373 miles per hour. They eventually tested the Jumo 222 in 11 different aircraft, including the bombers: a Focke-Wulf Fw 191 and a Heinkel He 219 Uhu (“Eagle-Owl”).

In 1940, following weight increases to the JU 288 from adding a crew member and new equipment, the Germans raised the power requirements for the 222 to 2500 horsepower. The next version of the 24-cylinder Juno 222, the C/D, came in 1941 with a 2500-3000 horsepower requirement for high altitudes. This was initially just a goal until 1945 when the RLM determined they “desperately” needed a 3000-horsepower engine.

24-cylinder englines like the Junkers Jumo 222 powered the Junkers JU-288 Bomber — Junkers Jumo 222 Powered the Junkers JU-288 Bomber. | Image: Oldmachinepress.com

Allied Bombing Impacts Engine Production.

While the Jumo 222 did well in testing, problems interfered with its development. Allied bombing in 1943 and 1944 caused shortages and began to affect German industry. This forced the RLM to choose which aircraft and engines to produce.

Delays for Jumo 222 Due to Changing Requirements

Perhaps the most interesting problem for the Jumo 22 was that it may have been delayed intentionally. Some have gone as far as suggesting that the requirements kept changing, causing both the engine and JU 288 bomber to fail.

Closeup Showing the Tight Fit of the Large Jumo 222 Engine -- one of the 24-cylinder engines used during the Second World War — Closeup Showing the Tight Fit of the Large Jumo 222 Engine. | Image: oldmachinepress.com

Ferdinand Brandner, one of the 24-cylinder engine’s designers, said, “The tragedy of this engine development lay in the continual demands for performance increases that came from the airframe development side, which, because of continually increasing weight excesses, could not attain the calculated flying performance. The Jumo 222 was developed to death.”

Frequent Design Changes Possibly Used to Prevent Improvements

According to some reports, Erhard Milch, Air Inspector General of the Luftwaffe and in charge of aircraft production, wanted the program to fail. Milch announced he was concerned that Junkers would monopolize engines and aircraft. Some felt he was altering production requirements “just as they were about to be met by Junkers.” Regardless of the reason, Junkers could never keep up with all the changes.

The Germans saw an eventual need for more powerful powerplants than the Jumo 222 24-cylinder engine. In 1937, they started planning for a Jumo 255. This would have 36 cylinders, and they forecasted it to produce 3500-4000 horsepower. Germany never actually built the Jumo 225.

British Napier Sabre More Successful Than German Jumo-222

Both the Napier Sabre and German Jumo 222 engines had problems throughout their development. However, the Napier Sabre was clearly more successful in the war effort.

The proof is in the numbers: Great Britain produced about 5,000 Napier Sabres, while Germany only produced 289 Jumo 222s.

Qatar Airways, Boeing Announce Historic $96B Order

Dave Hartland

-

May 14, 2025

Qatar Airways, Boeing Announce Historic $96B Order

Could a massive order from Qatar Airways for Boeing widebodies be yet another sign that Boeing’s woes are finally in the rearview mirror?

Boeing has weathered a storm of setbacks in recent years, from safety scandals to production delays and financial losses.

Yet, a string of 2025 deals, headlined by a historic $96 billion order from Qatar Airways for up to 210 widebody aircraft, is a massive win for a company in desperate need of wins.

This deal—Boeing’s largest-ever widebody and 787 Dreamliner order—was announced on 14 May 2025 in Doha and significantly bolsters the company’s recovery.

A ‘Landmark’ Deal in Doha

Qatar Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner | IMAGE: Qatar Airways

The Qatar Airways order, unveiled at a high-profile accord-signing ceremony in Doha on Wednesday, includes firm commitments for 130 Boeing 787 Dreamliners and 30 Boeing 777-9 jets, with options for 50 additional aircraft of either type.

Today’s announcement coincides with US President Donald Trump’s state visit to the Gulf Arab country, the second stop on his tour of the Middle East.

Valued at $96 billion, it was announced alongside Qatari Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani, President Trump, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, Stephanie Pope, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, and Qatar Airways Group CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer.

After Ortberg signed the deal, President Donald Trump congratulated the OEM.

“Congratulations to Boeing,” Trump said. Get those planes out there. Get them out there.”

Congratulations to Boeing. Get those planes out there. Get them out there.
US President Donald J. Trump

This order would nearly double the capacity of Qatar Airways, operating a 230-aircraft fleet from its central hub at Doha Hamad International Airport (DOH). The carrier serves nearly 200 destinations—including 11 US cities like Miami (MIA), New York (JFK), Los Angeles (LAX), San Francisco (SFO), Washington (IAD), Houston (IAH), Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW), Atlanta (ATL), Boston (BOS), Chicago O’Hare (ORD), and Seattle (SEA).

This widebody order will undoubtedly leverage the 787’s fuel efficiency and the 777X’s extended range to bolster long-haul operations. With this agreement, Qatar will become the largest Dreamliner operator in the Middle East. It is the largest aircraft order in Qatar’s history.

“We are happy to announce our agreement with Boeing and our partnership in the largest aircraft order in our history,” said Qatar CEO Badr Mohammed Al-Meer. “A critical next step for Qatar Airways on our path as we invest in the cleanest, youngest, and most efficient fleet in global aviation. This so we can meet the strong demand in the airline as we seamlessly connect passengers to the world better than anyone.”

Qatar, a loyal Boeing customer with 64 Boeing 777s (seven -200s, 57 -300ERs) and 53 787s (31 -8s, 22 -9s), also operates a large number of Airbus aircraft, including 27 A320-200s, 11 A330s (three -200s, eight -300s), 58 A350 XWBs (34 -900s, 24 -1000s), and eight A380-800s. Bloomberg reports Qatar may order more A350s at the 2025 Paris Air Show next month.

Qatar Airways makes historic deals during President Trump’s visit with His Highness Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani Amir of the State of Qatar:

Boeing Agreement is up to 210 aircraft; 130 787 Dreamliners setting the record as the largest Dreamliner order, and 30 777-9 aircraft,… pic.twitter.com/sqEoPzDxEH
— Qatar Airways (@qatarairways) May 14, 2025

The Economic and Strategic Impact of Boeing’s Orders

Saudi aircraft lessor AviLease Boeing 737-8 — Saudi Arabian lessor AviLease placed an order for up to 30 Boeing 737 MAX 8s | IMAGE: Boeing

The deal is a boon for Boeing, which is grappling with a $500 billion, 5,700-jet backlog and no profits since 2018. The White House estimates the deal “will support 154,000 U.S. jobs annually, totaling over 1 million jobs during the course of production and delivery.” GE Aerospace benefits significantly, with its GE9X and GEnx engines powering the 777X and 787, respectively, reinforcing Boeing’s supply chain and US manufacturing. The order, comprising more than 400 GE9X and GEnx engines, also represents the largest widebody engine deal in GE Aerospace history.

This order follows other 2025 wins. On 13 May, Saudi Arabia’s Riyadh-based aircraft lessor AviLease placed a $4.8 billion order for up to 30 Boeing 737 MAX 8s (20 firm, 10 options), its first-ever direct order with Boeing. Just last week, International Airlines Group (IAG) announced a $10 billion deal for 32 787-10 Dreamliners for British Airways, spurred by a US-U.K. trade agreement.

These contracts signal renewed confidence in Boeing’s portfolio, particularly its widebody offerings, as it competes with Airbus. It’s certainly the best Boeing has looked in a long while.

Boeing’s Production Turnaround

Boeing's 787 Dreamliner assembly plant in North Charleston, SC — Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner assembly plant in North Charleston, SC | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s 2025 performance is encouraging. The company has delivered 175 aircraft year-to-date, including 45 in April and 41 in March, up 50% from 107 during the same period in 2024. Projections indicate 560 deliveries in 2025, compared to 348 in 2024, with a potential 800 by 2028. This ramp-up is critical for clearing the backlog and restoring profitability, especially for the 737 program, Boeing’s “meat-and-potatoes.”

The Qatar order diversifies Boeing’s production, reducing reliance on the 737 program. The 787, built in Everett and North Charleston, South Carolina, benefits from streamlined processes, though quality control remains under scrutiny. The 777X, awaiting certification with deliveries slated for 2026, is a long-term bet. Qatar’s commitment validates Boeing’s widebody strategy.

Overcoming Challenges

Boeing factory workers in Everett at a company training to implement high standards of quality and safety practices | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s recovery follows a rocky decade, including the 737 MAX crashes and the January 2024 Alaska Airlines Flight 1262 incident, where a window plug blew out midflight shortly after takeoff from Portland International Airport (PDX).

The near-catastrophe raised urgent safety concerns, prompting CEO Kelly Ortberg’s return from retirement. Since then, he has prioritized safety and quality, helped resolve a 2024 worker strike, and stabilized finances. Additionally, Ortberg has implemented much stricter supplier audits and production oversight to rebuild public trust.

It’s worth noting that this deal comes amid controversy surrounding a potential Qatari gift of a Boeing 747-8 to President Trump and ongoing delays with the new Air Force One program. That said, AvGeekery’s focus remains squarely on aviation—we’ll leave the political angles to other outlets.

The Road Ahead

Belly of 777X bound for Qatar Airways — Boeing Classic Qatar Air 777X Flyover TPC at Snoqualmie Ridge | IMAGE: Boeing

Boeing’s 2025 wins are encouraging for the beleaguered manufacturer. The Qatar deal, the largest widebody and 787 order in Boeing’s history underscores continued confidence in its products.

Going forward, Boeing’s stakes are clear. It must maintain and improve quality, accelerate the certification process for the 777X, 737 MAX 7, and 737 MAX 10, and sustain delivery momentum.

Boeing’s path forward requires precision. With 560 deliveries targeted for 2025 and a long-term goal of 800 by 2028, Ortberg’s leadership will be tested. For now, the Qatar order is an unequivocally significant step in the right direction.

Could it be that Boeing is climbing out of its challenges and heading toward a brighter future? Time will tell, but if the first few months of 2025 are any indication, we are betting big on our storied planemaker.

How Lightning Doomed Pan Am Flight 214 in 1963

-

May 14, 2025

How Lightning Doomed Pan Am Flight 214 in 1963

Thankfully, today’s travelers are unlikely to experience a tragedy such as one from Pan Am Flight 214 over Maryland nearly 62 years ago.

Today’s commercial aircraft can safely withstand lightning with little to no harm to anybody on board. Over 60 years ago, however, aircraft were more vulnerable to problems that came from lightning strikes, and that was especially true for Pan American World Airways (Pan Am) Flight 214.

On 8 December 1963, Flight 214 took off after a refuel in Baltimore, Maryland, with the aircraft plummeting to the earth 35 minutes later. None of the 81 people on board survived the crash.

Pan Am Flight 214, a Boeing 707-121, Crashed in Maryland Following a Lightning Strike

Pan Am Flight 214 departed San Juan, Puerto Rico, at 1610 local time. Almost reaching its destination in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the flight stopped at Baltimore’s Friendship International Airport (BAL) to refuel at 1935 local. An airline mechanic inspected the aircraft before taking off once more.

The crew aboard the flight turned back to Baltimore due to Philadelphia weather and waited in a holding pattern so the plane could safely land. The crew decided to return to BAL because Philadelphia was experiencing strong winds. The aircraft was reportedly flying at 5,000 feet during this pattern.

At 2058, lightning struck the Boeing, causing the fuel inside the reserves to explode and catch fire. The Philadelphia Approach Control frequency repeatedly received “Mayday” messages. Another transmission was heard saying, “Clipper 214 is going down in flames.”

The plane crashed two miles from Elkton, Maryland, with a large part of the plane’s left wing separated. All 73 passengers and eight crew members died.

The wreckage of Pan Am Flight 214 — Image: NTSB

Witnesses of the accident recalled a light rain that evening, with cloudy skies and lightning. According to a weather report in Wilmington, Delaware, nine miles east of the accident site, a thunderstorm began at 2054 local time, just a few minutes after the plane departed Baltimore.

In 1965, the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) filed an extensive aircraft accident report of the flight.

How Lightning Brought Down a Boeing 707

Several key factors caused the vulnerability to lightning damage of the Boeing 707-121:

Lack of Protective Measures: In the 1960s, commercial aircraft didn’t have protection from lightning like they do today. These measures include static dischargers or protecting housing for fuel reserves. The Flight 214 crash led to research into improving and protecting the fuel tank to prevent similar tragedies in the future.

Fuel Tank Design: Boeing also didn’t consider the risks of lightning strikes when designing the aircraft’s fuel tank. While investigators never determined the source of the ignition, researchers had a strong guess that it was a combination of improper bonding and the left wing’s skin overheating, exposing flammable fuel vapors from inside. This oversight would cause the lightning current to travel to the fuel tank and cause the ignition.

Opting For a Holding Pattern: In hindsight, putting the jet into a holding pattern at 5,000 feet was an extreme risk. Lightning is most prevalent at low altitudes; this type of lightning is known as ‘cloud-to-ground lightning.’

The CVR from Pan Am Flight 214 — “1963 Wire Photo worker looks at recorder from Pan American Flight 214 Aircraft crash”

The Pan Am Flight 214 Tragedy Led to Important Improvements in Aviation Safety

Pan Am Flight 214 is often known as a ‘catalyst’ for researchers looking to prevent risks brought on by lightning when planning vehicle production.

Each airplane that flies regularly will be hit by lightning at least once yearly. Aircraft today are durable enough to withstand lightning strikes, which travel through the jet on their way to the Earth. The most damage lightning can typically cause is holes, cracks, or burn marks on the plane’s exterior.

More often than not, nobody on a commercial aircraft knows when a lightning strike occurs, thanks to decades of manufacturers overcoming the shortcomings that led to specific scenarios like the tragedy of Flight 214.

Collaborative Combat Aircraft Teaming with Next Generation Fighters

Military

-

May 13, 2025

Collaborative Combat Aircraft Teaming with Next Generation Fighters

The Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) initiative is a crucial component of the U.S. Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, ensuring the service maintains air superiority into the future.

The basic plan for the CCA is to deploy semi-autonomous aircraft in unmanned-manned teams, along with manned fifth— and sixth-generation fighters. Following a bidding period, the Air Force has chosen Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to design, build, and test prototypes for the program.

Collaborative Combat Aircraft to be Cost Effective and Versatile

The broad concept for the CCA is to develop a new type of mostly autonomous unmanned aircraft that is significantly cheaper than piloted fighters. The new collaborative combat aircraft (CCAs) will carry a variety of sensors, weapons, and tactical systems. They will perform missions including intelligence gathering, surveillance and reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and striking targets.

In a 2022 test of Collaborative Combat Aircraft capabilities, General Atomics paired its MQ-20 Avenger unmanned aircraft with a Sabreliner and two F-5 Advanced Tigers. | Image: General Atomics — In a 2022 test of its Collaborative Combat Aircraft capabilities, General Atomics paired its MQ-20 Avenger unmanned aircraft with a Sabreliner and two F-5 Advanced Tigers. | Image: General Atomics

Significant Cost Advantages with CCAs

There are some key reasons for the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. First, CCAs will cost about one-third the cost of manned fifth—and sixth-generation fighters. Another cost benefit will be due to the CCAs’ flying schedule. Being unmanned, they will not require as many daily sorties as manned aircraft to maintain combat readiness. Also, much of the training for CCAs will occur virtually, resulting in fewer sorties. Maintenance costs will also be lower with fewer flights and less wear and tear.

Tactical and Strategic Advantages of CCAs

These cost advantages will allow the Air Force to acquire a large number of CCAs, which fits well with tactical and strategic plans. For example, China is developing advanced long-range air defense systems that could seriously challenge U.S. aircraft. By deploying large numbers of CCAs in a swarm without direct human supervision, the Air Force could overwhelm enemy defenses.

The Anduril YFQ-44A unmanned Collaborative Combat Aircraft. | Image: Anduril

“You can create mass, and so many targets out in the battlespace that your adversary will have to worry about … is that something that I have to use some munitions on,” said General Kenneth Wilsbach in 2023, then Commander of Pacific Air Forces.

Initial plans are for the Air Force to deploy 1000 CCAs. The mission profile will be to pair two CCAs with advanced fighters. The Air Force called the CCA program “a cost-effective and pragmatic solution to possess a formidable airpower capacity.”

Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Building First CCAs

In April 2024, the Air Force selected Anduril and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems to develop the first-generation Combined Combat Aircraft. The Anduril design is the YFQ-44A, and the General Atomics model is the YFQ-42A. The names come from Air Force aircraft designations of “Y” for prototype, “F” for fighter, “Q” for unmanned aircraft, “44” for design number, and “A” for first version.

Anduril Aircraft to Have Stealthy Characteristics

The Anduril YFQ-44A will have components, including passive infrared and infrared search and track (IRST) sensors. Early photographs of the YFQ-44A show stealthy features like an angular shape for the air intake and a trapezoidal-shaped nose landing gear bay door.

“Today, just one year after Anduril was selected to produce production-representative prototypes for the CCA program, the Air Force announced that Anduril’s YFQ-44A has begun ground testing,” said Dr. Jason Levin, senior vice president of Air Dominance & Strike at Anduril.

The Anduril YFQ-44A design, also called the “Fury,” is scheduled to make its first flight this summer (2025).

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems CCA Suited for Combat

The General Atomics Aeronautical Systems YFQ-44A has features that show its suitability for combat missions. These include internal bays that can carry AIM-120 AMRAMM air-to-air missiles and additional payload space for other munitions. It also features stealthy features like a dorsal air intake high on the fuselage, an elongated shape, and V-tails.

General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Collaborative Combat Aircraft.| Image: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems

The Collaborative Combat Aircraft program will operate, in part, with autonomy control software created by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency’s (DARPA’s) Air Combat Evolution (ACE) system. Artificial Intelligence will also be part of the control system for the CCAs.

CCA Receives Significant Funding

The amount of money the Air Force dedicates to the CCA program shows how serious it is about the program. Its preliminary budget request in 2024 was for $490 million to speed up the development and testing of the CCAs. The service has also proposed an additional investment of $6 billion through 2028.

An Airline Just for Sports Teams? Champion Air’s Inspiring 21-Year Story

-

May 12, 2025

An Airline Just for Sports Teams? Champion Air’s Inspiring 21-Year Story

With large groups of people needing to travel all across the country, one company easily saw an opportunity to do business with several sports teams that had to fly to 20 to 30 destinations in a single season.

For over twenty years, Champion Air became a trusted name for NBA, NHL, and collegiate teams. In the late 2010s, it inspired teams to start purchasing their own jets. This article explores Champion Air’s history.

Champion Air’s Big Bet

Champion Air started out as MGM Grand Air in 1987. It was founded by businessman Kirk Kerkorian, who also owned the titular hotel and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. The airline initially focused on upscale leisure travel on Boeing 727s and Douglas DC-8s.

The airline flew the LAX to JFK route and catered primarily to businessmen and celebrities who had a lot of money to spend. However, the airline later discovered it was losing business to private jet companies. After realizing the uphill battle, Kerkorian wanted to sell the airline in 1994.

In July 1995, MGM Grand sold the airline to Front Page Tours, a tour operator based in Edina, Minnesota. Front Page Tours planned to use the airline to charter sports teams and their fans. The airline’s name was changed to Champion Air, and the fleet was updated to customized Boeing 727s.

Champion Air would move its hub to Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) and establish other destinations in Detroit, Dallas, Denver, Las Vegas, St. Louis, and Oklahoma City.

The airline would then serve two purposes: charter sports teams during seasons and charter customers who had purchased MLT Vacations packages, as Northwest owned MLT Vacations at the time.

Champion Air Goes for Gold

In March 1997, Front Page Tours sold the airline to a joint venture between Northwest Airlines and Minnesota Twins owner Carl Pohlad. Champion Air’s headquarters relocated to Northwest’s Minneapolis headquarters. Though Northwest owned Sun Country Airlines, this acquisition allowed Champion Air to surpass Sun Country as the number-one charter operator in the region.

It didn’t appear Champion Air was open to flying the everyday passenger as early reports indicated. Based on the list of destinations, the airline would charter teams like the Minnesota Timberwolves and/or Wild, Detroit Pistons and/or Red Wings, Dallas Mavericks and/or Stars, the Denver Nuggets, the Colorado Avalanche, and the St. Louis Blues.

In the mid-2000s, Champion Air wasn’t doing too well financially, despite interest in MLT Vacations among travelers. In late 2007, Northwest would transfer all MLT customers’ flights from Champion Air to Northwest. Seeing that most of Champion’s revenue came from MLT, this was a big blow for the carrier.

The writing was on the wall for Champion Air in December 2007. Champion Air CEO Lee Steele told reporters that the airline ‘lost all contract revenue’ on its pre-existing charter arrangements for the 13 NBA teams and Northwest’s subsidiary MLT Vacations.

Champion Air Eliminated from Contention

On 31 March 2008, Champion Air announced that it would cease operations on 31 May, when most NBA teams were finished playing that season. At the time of closing, the airline had 14 Boeing 727s and around 550 employees.

The explanation was the high cost of jet fuel, which, at the time, was oil at more than $100 per barrel. A representative claimed the airline had enough money to pay for staffing and operations until the last flight.

One anonymous employee commented on the airline’s closing at the end of May 2008.

‘I am not going to discuss or debate the circumstances only to say that the company responsibly closed out operations without leaving passengers stranded or filing for bankruptcy,’ he said.

The 727 operated by Champion Air %282419569892%29 — Image: By Cory W. Watts from Wikimedia Commons

Most of the remaining 727s were later scrapped, while the rest were sold to ‘foreign carriers.’

Northwest Airlines would later handle the contracts of the 13 NBA teams, though the airline didn’t even make it to the following preseason. Delta Air Lines acquired Northwest Airlines later in 2008. MLT Vacations then rebranded as Delta Vacations, which is still in business today.

Flawless Launch as China Sends 3 Astronauts to Tiangong Space Station

-

May 12, 2025

Flawless Launch as China Sends 3 Astronauts to Tiangong Space Station

On 24 April 2025, China launched a Long March 2F rocket carrying a Shenzhou spacecraft and three astronauts to its Tiangong space station.

The rocket blasted off from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center in northern China, located 93 miles from the border with Mongolia.

Successful Launch and Arrival at Space Station

According to astrophysicist Dr. Maggie Liu, the launch was “flawless, as expected,” adding, “This rocket has launched with a 100% success rate since the 90s, so it’s no surprise this is smooth sailing for them.”

The Chinese Long-March-2F rocket lifting off on 24 April 2025. | Image: The Launch Pad Network — The Chinese Long March 2F rocket lifting off on 24 April 2025. | Image: The Launch Pad Network

Following an approximately 6.5-hour flight, the spacecraft docked with the Tiangong space station. This station orbits the earth between 217 and 280 miles, similar to the 200 – 250 mile range of the International Space Station.

A Chinese Shenzhou spacecraft like the one that docked at the Tiangong space station on 24 April 2025. | Image: SpaceChina

Crew to Remain in Space for Six Months

The crew that just went to space is replacing the current Chinese astronauts, who arrived at the station in October 2024 and have been there for 175 days. They returned to Earth on 30 April 2025, following a brief overlap with the new group. The new crew will live on the station for six months.

While in space, the astronauts will perform spacewalks to perform maintenance, install new equipment, and conduct experiments in new technologies and medical science.

China Space Station Core Module Deployed In 2021

China launched the core “Tianhe” module in April 2021. Located in the center of the station, it provides life support and has crew living quarters. The following year, China launched two additional sections, the Wentian and Mengtian laboratory and experiment modules.

View during a spacewalk at the Chinese space station. | Image: CMSA/CCTV/Chinese Academy of Sciences

The Wentian module, on the left side of the station, has more living quarters, supplemental life support equipment, and an external system with a robotic arm. The Mengtian module, on the right, has an airlock, which astronauts can use to transfer experiments and equipment in and out of the station.

The first cargo mission to the Tiangong space station, Tianzhou-2, launched on 29 May 2021. Following this, the first crewed mission, carrying three astronauts, launched on 17 June 2021. They stayed in space for three months, testing equipment and preparing the station for future missions.

United States Bans China from International Space Station

In 2011, the United States Congress banned the Chinese from participating in the ISS program, citing security concerns. Referencing a law called the “Wolf Amendment,” Congress blocked NASA from cooperating with the China National Space Administration (CNSA). No Chinese astronaut has visited the ISS. After this, if China wanted to establish a presence in space, they had no choice but to build their own facility.

Tiangong Space Station has Three Modules – For Now

The Tiangong space station, at about 24 tons, has about 20% of the mass of the ISS, which weighs about 400 tons. While it has three modules, the ISS has 16.

The core Tianhe module measures 54 feet in length. It has a docking hub to connect with crew and cargo spacecraft and its robotic arm, which crews use to position the Mengtian and Wentian modules.

Major Expansion Planned In Coming Years

China plans to significantly expand the Tiangong space station in the next few years. The expansion will primarily involve new sections, the next one due to be installed in about four years.

“We will build a 180-ton, six-module assembly in the future,” said Zhang Qiao of the China Academy of Space Technology (CAST).

Image during a test of an inflatable module during an earlier mission. | Image: China Association for Science and Technology

Part of this will be a multipurpose expansion module with six docking ports. Other full-size sections will then connect to the station. For this expansion, China is developing inflatable modules. They will serve as additional crew living areas and preliminary stages for future missions to the moon. The expansion will also allow more spacecraft to dock at the station simultaneously.

China Developing Its Version of the Hubble Space Telescope

China is also developing a telescope similar to the Hubble Space Telescope. Initial plans are to orbit near the station and dock with it for repairs, maintenance, refueling, and upgrades.

Artist rendition of future space telescope. | Image: National Astronomical Observatory of China

The country also wants to attract international visitors to Tiangong. For example, Pakistan plans to send one of its astronauts on a future Chinese mission. China also hopes to send commercial spacecraft and tourists to the station eventually.

The Tiangong space station is just one part of the Chinese space program. They have explored the far side of the moon, landed a rover on Mars, and want to land a manned mission on the moon before 2030. They have even hinted about a possible future mission to Jupiter.

Tupolev Tu-144: The Flawed Soviet Spectacle that Beat Concorde

-

May 9, 2025

Tupolev Tu-144: The Flawed Soviet Spectacle that Beat Concorde

The Concorde may have been a game-changing jet when it entered service in 1976, but a rival Russian jet—the Tupolev Tu-144—happened to be in the air one year earlier.

The earlier service, however, was a detriment to the ambitious aircraft, as the Tupolev wasn’t as refined overall as its Western European competitor. Thus, its history was a little more uneventful.

The Birth of the Soviets’ ‘Konkordski’

While England and France collaborated on developing the Concorde, Russia wanted to not only have an answer but also beat it to the market. With the help of aerospace company Tupolev, Russia built the Tu-144, nicknamed the ‘Konkordski.’

Development of the supersonic jet began in 1963, with the plan being to build four prototypes by 1966. The Tu-144 took its maiden flight on 31 December 1968, which predated the Concorde’s first flight by a couple of months.

The Tu-144 was a very impressive jet at the time of its development. The Russian jet exceeded the Concorde in top speed at 1,518 miles per hour (2,443 kilometers per hour), Mach 2.35. However, the Tu-144 was much less efficient.

1973 06 Bourget TU144 281329 — Tupolev Tu-144 | Image: P.L THILL from Wikimedia Commons

Mainly, the Tu-144 was almost 50,000 pounds heavier than the Concorde, which made control and maneuvering more difficult. Although the Concorde was more technologically advanced, the braking and aerodynamics of the Tu-144 were not known to measure up even closely.

The 1973 Paris Air Show Tragedy

Tragedy struck at the Paris Air Show when a Tupolev Tu-144 crashed and killed 14 people during an exhibition flight on 3 June 1973. According to eyewitness reports, the crew tried to demonstrate the jet’s acceleration by flying at a low altitude. The aircraft, however, couldn’t endure the stress and began to disintegrate in midair. Tu-144 parts rained on the village below, causing scenes of chaos and destruction.

The Tu-144 crashed in a nearby village, killing all six crew members and eight villagers, including three children. The accident also injured 60 additional people on the ground. Many consider the 1973 crash the moment the jet’s fate was sealed.

Nonetheless, Russia continued its plans to fly the jet commercially, even flying again at the Paris Air Show in later years. In 1975, the Tu-144 began flying mail and cargo between Moscow, Russia, and Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan. Passenger flights were permitted starting in 1977.

Passengers aboard these flights quickly had an unpleasant experience. The interior was very noisy, to the point that colleagues and family members had to exchange written notes to have conversations on flights. The noise was due to the engines and the air conditioners that kept the cabin from overheating.

1600px Tupolev Tu 144 40 Central Air Force Museum — One of the remaining Tupolev Tu-144 airframes still in existence today | Image: Maarten from Wikimedia Commons

The Tupolev Tu-144 Program Comes to an End

Aeroflot had a five-year deal with Tupolev in 1976, but it called it quits on the Tu-144 in 1978 when it crashed again while being delivered to Russia’s flag carrier. The airline only managed 102 flights with the supersonic jet, with just over half the flights carrying passengers.

Tupolev ceased production of the Tu-144 in 1982. The jet was then used by the Soviet program to train space pilots and NASA for supersonic research. The last flight of the Tu-144 occurred on 26 June 1999 as part of NASA’s High-Speed Civil Transport program.

As of this writing, only seven out of 17 Tu-144s are still in one piece. Six of them are on display or in storage in Russia, while one is on the Auto & Technik Museum’s rooftop in Sinsheim, Germany. Of the ten other units, two were destroyed in the accidents mentioned above, six were scrapped, and the other two’s whereabouts are unknown.

Thousands Pre-Order World’s First Commercially Available Flying Car

News

-

May 9, 2025

1

Thousands Pre-Order World’s First Commercially Available Flying Car

San Mateo, Calif.-based Alef Aeronautics has unveiled the world’s first commercially available flying car, the Alef Model A.

A prototype model made a test flight on 19 February 2025 on a blocked-off road in California. According to Alef’s chief executive officer, Jim Dukhovny, the test was “the first documented verifiable flight of a flying car (an actual car, with vertical takeoff, non-tethered.)”

Closeup image of the Alef Model A flying car. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

Alef Model A to be Functional Car and Aircraft

Much more than just a toy or a concept vehicle from science fiction, the Alef Model A has attracted significant interest and support, proving the validity and potential of its design. Its basic plan is that it can drive on the road like any car, have vertical takeoff and landing capabilities, and fly in a forward motion. The company also announced a goal for the vehicle to be “affordable for most people.”

The Alef Model A flying car is an all-electric vehicle with a driving range of 200 miles and a flight range of 110 miles. The company has also announced it will provide a hydrogen option, which will extend range capabilities.

Safety a Priority for Alef Aeronautics

In many of its promotional materials, the company mentions how it has made safety features and components an important part of the Model A’s overall design. Alef reported that it has been making test drives and flights since 2019. Dukhovny said that prior to the February test, he had often been asked why he had not released other videos of it flying.

Alef Model A flying car will operate like any other car driving on the road. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

“We’re obsessed with safety, and we wanted to make sure the car is safe enough for consumers before we actually show it,” said Dukhovny.

Some safety-related components and measures on the Alef Model A flying car include building it with triple to octuple redundancy on certain components, an obstacle detection and avoidance system, and a ballistic parachute. It also has no exposed propellers, even though concept videos show several under the vehicle’s outer skin.

Company Makes Bold Claims for Its Flying Car

As Alef moves closer to full-scale manufacturing of the Model A flying car, the company has made several bold claims about its features and quality. One example came after the February demonstration.

Model A Flying car during another test flight. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

“This drive and flight test represents an important proof of technology in a real-world city environment. We hope it will be a moment similar to the Wright Brothers’ Kitty Hawk video, proving to humanity that new transportation is possible,” said Jim Dukhovny.

In another claim related to the Model A’s energy efficiency, Alef reports, “On average, the Alef flying car uses less energy per trip than a Tesla or any other EV, as well as less energy per trip than eVTOL air taxis.”

The company also stated what customers will pay for a Model A flying car. Their marketing materials state, “It has to be affordable for most people (not just the rich). However, they also announced that the expected price of the vehicle will be $299,999, hardly an affordable cost for most people.

Investors, Manufacturers, and Customers Enthusiastic

Despite this, there is ample evidence of broad support and optimism for the development of the Model A flying car.

Top view of prototype model of Alef Model A. | Image: Alef Aeronautics

Alef has received two patents for its design. Another positive sign for the Model A is that it is the first vehicle with vertical takeoff capability to receive an FAA Special Airworthiness Certificate, which gives it permission to fly in the United States.

In 2015, Alef contacted venture capitalist Tim Draper to see if he might be interested in the flying car project. Draper was impressed and became one of the company’s biggest investors. He has also become a mentor for the leadership team at Alef.

Alef Signs Agreement With Manufacturer

In September 2024, Alef Aeronautics entered a manufacturing agreement with PUCARA Aero and MYC, a Spanish joint venture that has made aviation-grade components for Boeing, Airbus, and other civilian and military aviation companies. Since then, the biggest sign that people are excited about the vehicle is that the company has received over 3200 pre-orders and is planning to begin mass production.

Chinese Company Developing Two Flying Car Designs

Alef is not the only company working on a flying car project. Chinese manufacturer XPENG AEROHT is developing two interesting vehicles. The first is their Land Aircraft Carrier. XPENG AEROHT calls this a “modular flying car.” It is a four-seat, six-wheel vehicle that resembles a minivan. Inside, there is an eVTOL aircraft called the Lunar Rover.

XPENG AEROHT Land Aircraft carrier vehicle during deployment of its Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft. | Image: XPENG AEROHT

The Land Aircraft Carrier operates as a mothership, recharging the aircraft while driving and when parked. The company claims the aircraft will deploy within five minutes after pressing one button. The Lunar Rover has six rotors, and its arms and blades fold to fit inside the mothership. The company hopes to begin selling the vehicle in 2026.

XPENG AEROHT Lunar Rover eVTOL aircraft in flight. | Image: XPENG AEROHT

XPENG AEROHT is also beginning to develop its own eVTOL flying car. Early designs for the vehicle resemble a futuristic sports car. Concept images and videos show it driving like a regular car. Then, four rotors deploy from the vehicle’s roof, and it takes off.

Mockup of the XPENG AEROHT eVTOL flying car.| Image: XPENG AEROHT

US Unveils Next-Gen ATC System to Revolutionize Aviation Safety

News

Dave Hartland

-

May 8, 2025

US Unveils Next-Gen ATC System to Revolutionize Aviation Safety

On Thursday, US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy introduced a transformative plan for the nation’s air traffic control (ATC) system, describing it as a “state-of-the-art” initiative that “will be the envy of the world.”

The announcement, made at the Department of Transportation headquarters in Washington, D.C., marks a bold step toward modernizing an outdated system that has long plagued the aviation industry with safety risks, delays, and inefficiencies.

“We are seizing a once-in-a-generation opportunity to build a brand new, state-of-the-art air traffic control system,” Duffy said. “Decades of neglect have left us with an outdated system that is showing its age. Building this new system is an economic and national security necessity, and the time to fix it is now.”

Building this new system is an economic and national security necessity, and the time to fix it is now.
US Department of Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy

US Department of Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy holds up floppy disks — US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy and Airlines for America (A4A) president and CEO Nicholas Calio use visual aids like floppy disks and paper flight strips to demonstrate the antiquity of the American ATC system and the need for its overhaul | IMAGE: US Dept of Transportation

The current ATC system’s obsolescence was starkly illustrated during the event, as Duffy used floppy disks and CDs—components still in use—as visual aids. He noted that replacement parts are often sourced from eBay, calling the situation “100% unacceptable.” The new system aims to replace this dangerously antiquated infrastructure with cutting-edge technology to enhance safety, reduce outages, and improve efficiency.

No more replacing floppy disks and other antiquated parts so old you can only find them on eBay.

It’s time for a brand new air traffic control system that makes our country proud.

Thank you @POTUS for your leadership! Now it’s time to get to work and make American air travel… pic.twitter.com/dn3RqTx9kr
— Secretary Sean Duffy (@SecDuffy) May 9, 2025

A Comprehensive Overhaul

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will spearhead replacing core infrastructure, including radar, software, hardware, and telecommunications networks. The plan is structured around four key components: communications, surveillance, automation, and facilities. Specific actions include:

Upgrading Communications: Replacing outdated telecommunications equipment with modern fiber, wireless, and satellite technologies across more than 4,600 sites, installing 25,000 new radios, and deploying 475 new voice switches.
Modernizing Surveillance: Replacing 618 aging radars far exceeding their intended lifespan.
Enhancing Runway Safety: Expanding the Surface Awareness Initiative (SAI) to 200 airports, up from the 50 expected by the end of 2025.
Rebuilding Facilities: Six new air traffic control centers—the first since the 1960s—will be constructed while some of the existing 21 centers are closed and consolidated. Additionally, the overhaul calls for replacing 15 towers and 15 Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facilities.
Standardizing Technology: Installing new hardware and software to ensure all air traffic facilities operate on a common platform, promoting consistency and safety.
Improving Weather Monitoring: Building 174 new weather stations in Alaska to bolster air travel safety.

A summarized overview of the updates is available here, with a detailed version accessible here.

Addressing a Changing Industry

A United Archer Midnight eVTOL aircraft | IMAGE: Archer

The new ATC system must accommodate the aviation industry’s increasingly rapid evolution. With drones and advanced air mobility expected to become commonplace, the modernized infrastructure will ensure the system can handle increased complexity and volume. This overhaul complements a recently announced plan to increase air traffic controller staffing, addressing chronic shortages that have raised safety concerns for years.

Duffy emphasized the initiative’s broad support, noting a “large coalition” backing the effort.

“We won’t let the American people down,” he vowed.

We won’t let the American people down.
US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy

Key industry leaders attended the event, including CEOs Robert Isom (American Airlines), Scott Kirby (United Airlines), Ed Bastian (Delta Air Lines), Robert Jordan (Southwest Airlines), and Joanna Geraghty (JetBlue Airways). Representatives from the FAA, National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), and Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) were also present.

A Tribute to the Victims of Flight 5342

An American Eagle CRJ departs DCA — An American Eagle CRJ departs Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport | IMAGE: Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport on Facebook

The announcement carried profound emotional weight as families of the victims of PSA Flight 5342 attended the event. Flight 5342 crashed into the Potomac River on 30 January after colliding with a U.S. Army Blackhawk helicopter while approaching Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, killing all 67 on board.

Every speaker acknowledged the families, emphasizing that the ATC overhaul would serve as a lasting legacy for the victims. Sadly, getting the government to address a crisis simmering for decades took such a horrendous tragedy.

An Ambitious Timeline and Cost

FAA Tower and East Ramp Control at Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: LAS

While the price tag for the overhaul remains undisclosed, it is widely expected to reach at least tens of billions of dollars. Duffy acknowledged the significant cost but expressed confidence in securing funding, citing ubiquitous bipartisan support in Congress. He plans to request the full amount upfront to expedite the process.

Duffy set an ambitious goal of completing the overhaul by 2028, a timeline that would require streamlining approval processes that typically span years–not to mention unprecedented bipartisan cooperation in Washington. His promise of a swift overhaul timeline underscores the urgency of ensuring air traffic controllers have a reliable, modern system to support their critical work.

A Clarion Call for a Safer, More Efficient Future

The unveiling of the next-generation ATC system is a clarion call to reimagine the future of aviation—a future where safety, efficiency, and innovation take their rightful place at the helm of America’s ATC system. This isn’t just an upgrade; it’s a chance to revolutionize the entire system from top to bottom, obliterate the shadows of recent failures, like the chaos of the Newark outage, and propel the United States to the forefront of global aviation leadership. By dismantling obsolete infrastructure and embracing cutting-edge technology, this initiative will slash delays, fortify safety, and unleash the full potential of our skies.

The event concluded with an emotional plea from Duffy.

“If you learn anything from what’s happened, it’s that if there are foreseeable issues in the airspace, you would expect someone to take action to make sure we save lives,” Duffy declared. “This is a way to honor, this is a way to respect, this is a way to pay it forward and to do the right thing to keep our families and our communities safe when they use our airspace.”

This is a way…to do the right thing to keep our families and our communities safe
when they use our airspace.
US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy

This overhaul is a demonstration of our collective resolve. It unites industry titans, safety champions, and the families of Flight 5342’s victims in a shared vision for transformation. Their presence at the announcement was a powerful reminder that this is about honoring the past by building a safer tomorrow.

The time for half-measures is over. Floppy disks and relics of the 1980s have no place in a world-class ATC system. This issue demands unyielding bipartisan support—a cause that transcends politics and unites us in pursuit of excellence. The new system will empower air traffic controllers with the tools they deserve, ensuring our skies are ready for the dawn of drones, advanced air mobility, and beyond.

Let us hope our leaders rise to this moment with courage and determination. Let us deliver an air traffic control system that inspires awe and confidence for generations to come. For our children and grandchildren, the miracle of flight should be a source of wonder, not worry.

You can watch the full video of today’s announcement below.

Boeing Scores $13B Dreamliner Order for British Airways

Dave Hartland

-

May 8, 2025