Home Blog Page 48

The Grumman F-14’s Top Speed: How Fast Can the Tomcat Fly?

0

When the movie TOP GUN was released in 1986, your author was a fourteen-year-old freshman in high school. I’d been a nut for things with wings for right around four years, and was eager to see the flick. Needless to say, after first taking it in, I was blown away.

TOP GUN cemented my interest in Naval Aviation and increased my fascination with the Grumman F-14 Tomcat. Almost to the point of obsession.

I wanted to know as much about the Tomcat as possible. So I began to seek answers to all the questions, including: what is the F-14’s Top Speed?

Do You Feel the Need?

Nowadays I watch that movie while wearing a couple’a different hats. The serious military aviation enthusiast in me cringes at certain points of the story. But the fourteen-year-old is still inside, somewhere. Both he and the serious guy gaze wide-eyed, and marvel at the stunning aerial cinematography.

We both revel in the overall atmosphere of awesome embodied in the film. And the high school kid still gets a kick outta the silly but witty banter. (Truth be told, so does the serious guy.)

Of all the the one-liners and catch-phrases to come outta that flick, one soars high above the rest. Or maybe I should say, it speeds further ahead of the rest. Yeah, you know which one I’m thinkin’ of. And that leads me back to the topic of this-here little ramble.

F 14 SPEED 002
Screengrab from TOP GUN

What Was the F-14’s Top Speed?

As with many such questions, the answer is, “it depends.”

An aircraft’s performance, specifically that of its power plant, can change in varying atmospheric conditions, especially with changes in temperature. Barometric pressure and humidity are also factors.

The F-14 family utilized two different engines: the F-14A was powered by two Pratt & Whitney TF30s. The F-14A+/F-14B, and F-14D were each powered by a pair of General Electric F110s.

Less quirky and more reliable than the TF30, the F110 also had a good bit more ‘oompf’; more thrust. But the key advantages of this increased thrust lay more within the regime of acceleration than of top-end speed. The F110-powered jets may have been slightly faster, but it didn’t really matter, as will become evident a bit later.

So, Grumman’s advertised top speed for all F-14s was Mach 2.34 at 40,000 feet; that’s 1342 knots, or 1,544 mph. At sea level, the max speed was given as Mach 1.2, which works out to 792 knots or 912 mph.

But was Mach 2.34 really the F-14’s Top Speed?

Nope. It wasn’t.

A fella named Charlie Brown was a test pilot for Grumman, and worked on the F-14 program. He served both as a pilot and as part of the design team. From an article titled ‘Tales of the F-14’ from the September 2006 ish of Air & Space Magazine, he is quoted:

“The [Navy] specs called for Mach 2.34. We actually tested the airplane for Mach 2.5. I flew it 2.5 a couple times.”

What is the F-14's top speed?
Project 914 Archives (S.Donacik collection)

And there you have it. Words from someone who had ‘been there and done that’. ‘Tis anecdotal proof, sure… which I know that some are inclined to take with a dose of salt.

So, if you don’t wanna take Charlie’s word for it alone, how about Dave Andersen? He was a Radar Intercept Officer (RIO) in Tomcats from 1983 to 1992. Sometime back, Dave made a comment on a post on Quora describing his time as a career GIB (Guy In Back) in F-14s. Here’s a relevant excerpt from that comment where Dave relates what happened during a test flight:

“That jet accelerated like it was blasted out of a cannon. In maybe 50 seconds we went from about 400 knots and reached the advertised top speed of Mach 2.34, and the jet was still accelerating. I’m sure she would’ve gone past 2.5 Mach if we’d let her, but backed off at that point because we were getting close to “bingo” fuel state.”

F 14 SPEED 003
U.S. Navy photo by Lieutenant Commander David Baranek

Was Speed the Top Priority?

Dave Andersen’s comment indirectly brings up a good point about flying fast in a gas-guzzling jet fighter. And that is that there’s a price to pay, and an inevitable tradeoff between speed and endurance.

Dave indicated that the main reason they did not keep going was because they were ‘bingo’ fuel. Flying fast in an F-14, or any other similar jet, requires use of the afterburners, and that means markedly increased fuel consumption.

Ward Carroll, another F-14 RIO, addresses this in one of his YouTube videos:

“Generally, during tactical intercepts we’d be flying around at 350-400 knots. So the fuel flow at that air speed, at, say 25,000 feet, would be 4,000, 4,500 max pounds per hour. So that’s 9,000 pounds per hour in a jet that can hold 16,200 pounds without tanks and 20,000 pounds with tanks. Now, as soon as you go into afterburner, now you’re consuming gas at a rate of 4,000 or 5,000 pounds per MINUTE. You will run out of gas fast; you have to be very judicious about your use of afterburner.”

What all’a that means is that the top speed of the F-14, or comparable jets, doesn’t really matter much. Such high speeds are of relatively limited use in most combat situations, and flying that fast burns too much gas.

So, What Exactly WAS the F-14’s Top Speed?

How many times have you read or heard a pilot or aircrew say something similar to what Dave Andersen did? “We probably could’a gotten more outta the bird.”

F 14 SPEED 004
U.S. Navy photo by Photographer’s Mate Airman Justin S. Osborne

All aircraft have their stated limits; limits that can often times be exceeded. If Charlie Brown’s claim is to be believed, then the F-14’s top speed was at least Mach 2.5. Dave Andersen’s claim certainly seems to support that.

It will likely never be known how fast an F-14 could truly fly. But it’s this guy’s opinion that the Tomcat’s top speed was a good bit more than Mach 2.5.

I’ll end with this; and it’s the fourteen-year-old in me that’s tappin’ the keyboard right now. All practical considerations aside, ‘Charlie’ in TOP GUN summarized things very nicely when she said, “You’re not going to be happy unless you’re going Mach 2 with your hair on fire”.

Gimli Glider – The Air Canada 767 That Made A Miracle Landing

The incident resulted from improper procedures, incorrect fuel load conversion, deferred maintenance, and bad luck.

Air Canada Flight 143 departed from Montréal–Dorval International Airport (YUL) on 23 July 1983. The new 767-200 climbed to 41,000 feet to fly above the strong jet stream. Halfway through its flight, a number of fuel warnings started to chime in the cockpit. At first, the warnings were thought to be caused by a faulty pump. But when one, and then the other, engine failed, it became apparent that the jet had somehow run out of fuel. Here’s a video about the Gimli Glider uploaded to YouTube by CBC News: The National

[youtube id=”3ffryZAd4Nw” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Air Canada Boeing 767 233 C GAUN@SFO17.02.1985 5702291035 AIa
Image via Aero Icarus

Making One Fine Emergency Landing

Air Canada Flight 143, the Gimli Glider
Air Canada Flight 143, the Gimli Glider | IMAGE: Public Domain

Captain Pearson established the jet at the optimal glide speed.  Being an experienced glider pilot, the captain made mental calculations that he could not make the emergency divert field of Winnipeg. Knowing the area, he queried the distances to other fields in the area.  He remembered that the old Gimli Air Force base was located nearby. After querying the controller, the crew determined that the closed field was within gliding distance.  With expert skill, including slipping the jet, the captain landed the jet on the former airstrip turned drag strip.  It was an unprecedented feat.  All 61 passengers survived.

1 6S2z8 4VAjNnQa Px1Qtog Timeline
image via timeline

But Not Quite a Unique Feat

The feat would stand alone until 1988 when a TACA Boeing 737 landed on levee near New Orleans with no loss of life.  Another amazing occurrence happened in January 2009 when Captain Sully Sullenberger guided his Airbus A320 to a safe powerless landing on the Hudson river.

C GAUN 604 Boeing 767 233 Air Canada the Gimli Glider Toronto July 14 1984. 5530418110 Andrew Thomasa
Gimli Glider 767-200 image via Andrew Thomas

14 Awesome Places To Watch Planes Land

0

As dedicated avgeeks, we’ve searched high and low across the United States and beyond to identify 14 awesome places to watch planes land that should be on your bucket list.

Whether you’re trying to impress your date or show your children the wonders of aviation, going to watch airplanes land is a time-honored tradition. The key is to know where to go!

Our list is focused on places that is safe for the whole family, regularly have unique aircraft, fun viewing locations, and dedicated areas that are friendly to spotters.

What other places do you recommend? Share your favorite places in the comments below.

1.) Sunset Beach, St. Maarten

Delta 757 Landing at Maho Beach. Image: Avgeekery
Delta 757 Landing at Maho Beach. Image: Avgeekery

This might be one of the holy grails of planespotting. With a runway located just off the beach near St. Maarten Princess Juliana International Airport, the views and the variety of aircraft landing doesn’t get much better than this. Even better, there are two bars located on each side of the approach end of the runway.

2.) In-N-Out Burger near Runway 24R at LAX Airport

In-N-Out Burger located just a few hundred feet from the 24R approach at LAX.  Image: Avgeekery
In-N-Out Burger located just a few hundred feet from the 24R approach at LAX. Image: Avgeekery

What’s better than burgers, animal-style fries, and A380s flying over your head? The locations provides a front-row view of the many heavies and international arrivals at LAX.

3.) Shep’s Mound at Sydney International Airport, Australia

sheps mound
14 Awesome Places To Watch Planes Land 14

Are you sensing a theme yet? Bring a picnic basket to watch arrivals and departures. The recently renovated park has picnic tables and a grassy area. It is located right by the air traffic control tower.

4.) London Heathrow

An American Airlines 777-300ER experienced a challenging landing at London's Heathrow airport. It was caught on film by BigJetTV.com
An American Airlines 777-300ER experienced a challenging landing at London’s Heathrow airport. It was caught on film by BigJetTV.com

This airport is a paradise for plane spotting even if the weather isn’t always cooperative. There are so many locations to spot unique jets and challenging approaches around the airport too. From hotels with a great view of the runways, to Myrtle Avenue, to observation decks, to meeting YouTube stars like BigJet.tv, you can’t go wrong.

5.) Gravelly Point Park near Washington-Reagan International Airport, Washington DC

A popular weekend hangout, this crowded park sits just off the approach end of runway 19 at DCA. Due to the curvilinear approach of airliners landing on the river visual, the planes almost appear to circle around the park as the fly less than 200 feet above your head. See this excellent video by “Chinda My Family Times” to see what I’m talking about.

6.) Narita International Observation Deck, Japan

naritaobservation deck
14 Awesome Places To Watch Planes Land 15

Narita gets such a unique array of international arrivals. This observation deck is a perfect place to meet other avgeeks and bond over our love of airplanes and aviation photography.

7.) Founders Plaza at DFW Airport, Texas

Located on the northwest side of DFW airport, this observation deck has a great view of arrivals and airport operations. Like American Airlines? This is your spot!

But wait…there’s more Awesome Places To Watch Planes Land! See the rest of our list by clicking on “Next Page” below.

The HZ-1 Aerocycle: Ahead of Its Time or Just Dangerous?

In the early 1950s, a team of designers thought it would be a good idea to not only design but actually build the wacky contraption called the de Lackner HZ-1 Aerocycle.  Why would they build it?

Developed in response to an idea for the development of one-man flying platforms, the HZ-1 was envisioned as a highly mobile military recon and transport vehicle for use on the then-much-anticipated ‘atomic battlefield’.

A Dangerous Looking Idea

Aerocycle Image 002
NASA photo

The HZ-1’s design incorporated a unique control system. Or maybe more accurately put, a control method, based on a then-novel concept known as ‘kinesthetic control’. ‘Twas thought up by Charles H. Zimmerman, an aeronautical engineer with the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA).

If Zimmerman’s name sounds familiar to you, then you’re probably a Vought fan. Or maybe you just like really weird things with wings. He designed the Vought XF5U ‘Flying Flapjack’ and its predecessor, the V-173 ‘Flying Pancake’ for the U.S. Navy during the early 1940s.

Great, now I’m hungry and gotta head to IHOP…

Zimmerman’s concept of ‘kinesthetic control’, well… if you want an in-depth explanation, you should google it because I ain’t smart enough to write about stuff like that.  In a nutshell, though, it’s all about using the natural physical inclinations of the human body as a flight control system.

This is where the word ‘crackpot’ came to mind for some folks back then.

Screwy Idea, But Simple… Right?

Aerocycle Image 001
U.S. Army Transportation Museum

The HZ-1 Aerocycle was propelled by 15-foot twin contra-rotating rotors driven by a 40-ish horsepower Mercury Marine outboard engine. It had a twist-throttle on handlebars, similar to that which you would find on a motorcycle.

The landing gear consisted of five rubber airbags. That is four small bags attached to the ends of booms arranged in an ‘X’ configuration and extending out horizontally from the main structure of the vehicle, with a fifth, larger bag directly underneath the main structure.

It Could Even Land On Water…Probably Once

The bags doubled as flotation devices, allowing the HZ-1 to land on water, though likely only in calm sea states. The bags were later replaced with a skid setup as used on many helicopters.

Mere Inches Above A Spinning Blade

The pilot stood on a tiny platform mounted right next to the engine and directly above the rotors. his body loosely secured to the main structure of the vehicle by a safety tether and his feet held in place by straps.

Here’s where that kinesthetic stuff comes in: the vehicle’s primary means of maneuvering was the shifting of weight distribution. Consider the body’s natural senses that provide us with good balance and equilibrium. It was thought they would also provide an HZ-1 pilot the ability to maintain effective directional control of the vehicle.

So, if the operator leaned forward, the vehicle would dip slightly at the front, and the rotors would push the machine forward. Lean to the left, move to the left. To the right…

Pretty simple, yeah?

Aerocycle Image 003
UNITED STATES – JANUARY 16: Army Sgt. Herman Stern pilots the Aerocycle. (Photo by Joe Petrella/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images)

Having been designed with this whole kinesthetic thing in mind, the  HZ-1 was intended for use by inexperienced infantrymen who had received a bare minimum of training in its operation… like… half an hour or so.

So, combat conditions.

Under fire.

Bullets whizzing past your head.

The human body’s natural response to said bullets’a-whizzin’ is often involuntary, jerky movements.

Meat-grinder rotor blades whirling below.

Yeah. What could possibly go wrong?

Rearing a Next Generation Foal

Aerocycle Image 004
U.S. Army Transportation Museum

Humor aside, the notion that the HZ-1 represented a logical next step in continuing the evolution of the archaic horse cavalry is inescapable. First we replaced our equine friends with motorcycles, then moved on to light tanks and other armored fighting vehicles. Why not advance further, up into the air with something akin to a mechanical flying horse?

The original prototype, called the DH-4 Helivector, was designed by Lewis C. McCarty Jr. of de Lackner Helicopters Inc. in Mount Vernon, New York. The DH-4 flew for the first time in November of 1954. A second prototype, designated DH-5, first flew in January of 1955 at the Brooklyn Army Terminal (BAT), New York.

In addition to the pilot, the Aerocycle could carry 120 pounds of cargo, and could achieve a maximum speed of 75mph. It had a range of about 15 miles, and could stay airborne for roughly 45 minutes. The reported maximum ceiling was 5,000 feet, but… well… why anyone would wanna take this thing up that high is beyond me.

During initial testing at BAT, the Aerocycle seemed somewhat promising, and the Army ordered twelve examples for further evaluation, under the designation YHO-1 (soon to be re-designated HZ-1). Testing continued at BAT and other nearby locations before the program moved to Felker Army Airfield at Fort Eustis, Virginia in 1956.

Like Trying to Break a Bronco

Aerocycle Image 006
U.S. Army Transportation Museum

Further testing brought certain flaws to light, most notably problems with the HZ-1’s operability. Chief test pilot at Fort Eustis was Captain Selmer Sundby, an experienced helicopter pilot who found the HZ-1 to be considerably more difficult to control than had been suggested.

Flights of the HZ-1 were rarely uneventful, filled with bumps and bounces, as well as both jerky and hesitant maneuvering. Control input was crucial, and versatility in technique was required. One had to be both subtle and aggressive, depending on the situation.

Sundby had doubts as to whether or not inexperienced infantrymen who’d never flown anything before could operate the Aerocycle safely at all, never mind after a mere half-hour’s worth of instruction. As it turns out, others had similar doubts. This included some within the media, as evidenced by this news clipping from 1956:

Aerocycle Image 005

Aside from the hazards that such control difficulties could add to an already highly dangerous combat situation, there were also significant safety issues stemming from the vehicle’s very design.

At least two accidents occurred during testing, caused by an inter-meshing of the type’s dual contra-rotating rotors. Your author is not certain which ‘oopsie’ is shown in the photo above, but in both instances the rotors flexed, struck one another, and shattered, resulting in the inevitable crash and a brief but highly undesirable transition of flight mode for the pilot. One incident occurred at an altitude of forty feet, and Capt. Sundby suffered a broken leg.

Throwing Riders

Here’s a news clipping that provides details of another incident in 1957. On this flight, the pilot was Professor Edward Seckel from the Department of Aeronautical Engineering at Princeton University, New Jersey.

Aerocycle Image 007

After much investigation and testing in the full-scale wind tunnel at Langley Research Center, Virginia, other flaws, including stability issues, were identified. But the root cause of the rotor-strike problem could not be determined, and the program was ultimately abandoned.

Win, Place, or Show? No Bet.

Another reason for its demise was that the HZ-1 Aerocycle was proving far less useful than had been hoped. Helicopters had matured considerably since the early egg-beaters of the previous decade, and were now emerging as a much more efficient and effective means of providing aerial battlefield mobility.

Cue footage showing droves of Bell UH-1 Hueys dropping green-camo-clad, M16-toting grunts into a hot LZ in the middle of the lush greenery of a Southeast Asian landscape, accompanied by the soundtrack of rotor blades thumping, cracking small arms fire, barely intelligible radio comms burning through static, and the Stones’ ‘Paint it Black’ playing in the background.

Aerocycle Image 008
U.S. Army Transportation Museum

The days of the one-man flying platform were over, having run their course in less than a decade. The HZ-1 Aerocycle simply turned out to be an impractical idea that progressed as far as it did largely because of its novelty and man’s necessary curiosity.

Many a road to success is paved over a footpath of failure. And in the end, the Aerocycle was swept aside to make way for greater things.

The HZ-1 Aerocycle Still Has Its Place In History

in all, fourteen Aerocycles were built, and just two survive today: one in the collection of the U.S. Army Transportation Museum at Fort Eustis and another at the Evergreen Aviation & Space Museum in McMinnville, Oregon.

Aerocycle Image 009
U.S. Army Transportation Museum

Think of these two survivors as reminders that, though genius is often coupled with more than a bit of madness, in the end, this particular crazy idea turned out to be just that – freakin’ nuts.

An RB-29 On a Secret Cold War Mission. What Could Go Wrong?

The history of this RB-29 is amazing, but visitor access may be a challenge.

3,970 Boeing B-29 Superfortresses were built by Boeing at Renton in Washington and Wichita, by Bell at Marietta, and by Martin in Omaha. The effort to design, develop, and produce these advanced aircraft was a massive undertaking. B-29s were adapted for everything from weather research to flying television transmitters.

Many B-29 airframes were modified to create long-range, high-altitude photo reconnaissance aircraft. Designated first as F-13 and later as RB-29, these recon Superfort variants flew reconnaissance, research, and test missions all over the world during the 1940s and 1950s. This story is about one of them.

b29 airplane
Early B-29 via US Air Force

A Post-War Beginning

B-29-100-BW Superfortress Air Force serial number 45-21847 entered service with the United States Army Air Force (USAAF) on 13 September 1945. Not long thereafter, the bomber was modified to F-13 specifications at the Oklahoma City Air Depot at Tinker Army Air Field (AAF).

45-21847 served the remainder of 1945 based out of Chino AAF and then Victorville AAF. From there, 45-21847 went to Warner Robins Air Depot at Robins AAF in Georgia to be modified for cold weather operations and was redesignated B-29F during April of 1946.

B 29 03
B-29 via US Air Force

Becoming the RB-29

By June 1946, the aircraft was assigned to Fairchild AAF in Washington. In April 1947, the aircraft was assigned to Muroc Flight Test Base (later Edwards Air Force Base [AFB]) in California. From there, the Superfort went to the Sacramento Air Depot at McClellan AAF in California to undergo modification to RB-29 standards. Once the mods were complete, which included the stripping of all her guns, 45-21847 was sent to the Naval Ordnance Test Station (NOTS) at Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) Inyokern (now China Lake).

B 29 04
B-29 via US Air Force

Fateful Flight

At Inyokern, the RB-29 was fitted with an experimental sensor system called Sun Tracker. The device was intended for intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) guidance using navigation by the sun. The RB-29 was also used for upper air research in conjunction with rocket flights being fired from White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico.

The Sun Tracker mission profile required a climb to 35,000 feet or so, and then a steep dive down to low altitude–in this case, as low above the surface of Lake Mead on the Arizona/Nevada border as possible. On 21 July 1948, pilot Captain Robert M. Madison and his crew of four were flying a Sun Tracker mission when the aircraft went too low and hit the lake’s surface going 250 miles per hour. Then the RB-29 did its best imitation of a skipping stone until coming to rest and taking on water. Fast.

Submerged RB-29 in Lake Mead
By Lake Mead NRA Public Affairs (B-29 Superfortress Submerged in Lake Mead) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Secret Mission = Secret Results

The impact with the surface of the lake had torn three of the four Wright R-3350-23 Duplex-Cyclone turbo-supercharged radial engines from the Superfort’s wings, leaving only engine #1. When the aircraft finally came to a stop, the crew was able to take to life rafts before the RB-29 sank beneath the surface of Lake Mead. The crew was rescued from the lake after six hours in their rafts.

They were admonished about disclosing any details regarding the flight, their mission, or the aircraft’s loss. Thanks to the classification of the Sun Tracker program, details were not made available until 50 years after 45-21847 sank.

Submerged RB-29 in Lake Mead
By Lake Mead NRA Public Affairs (B-29 Superfortress Submerged in Lake Mead) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Lost…and Found

A private dive team using side-scan sonar found the RB-29 wreck in the Overton Arm of Lake Mead in 2001. The wreck’s location dictates that the National Park Service (NPS) has custody of it. The Lady, as the Superfort is now called, is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.

Dives on the RB-29 wreck have been an on-again-off-again affair since it was discovered, thanks in part to variations in lake water depths due to drought in the region. The NPS is (quite justifiably) concerned about conserving the wreck, so dive ops to the site have been limited. But what 45-21847 did and how she got there is a much better story than the back-and-forth about diving the wreck.

19541227738 d0a4d2e813 o
By Lake Mead NRA Public Affairs (B-29 Superfortress Submerged in Lake Mead) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Bonus Video

Here’s a nice HD video produced by Lake Mead NRA Public Affairs about The Lady. It was uploaded to YouTube by Lake Mead. Enjoy.

[youtube id=”tXbwEpTfIkk” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

That Time Alan Pollock Flew a Hawker Hunter Through Tower Bridge

The Pilot Figured the RAF Wasn’t Doing Enough to Celebrate Their 50th Anniversary

With the 100th anniversary of the Royal Air Force (RAF) being celebrated all over the UK, this look at a 50th anniversary “celebration” seems in order. In early April of 1968, RAF Flight Lieutenant Alan Pollock was frustrated with the state of the RAF. The British aircraft industry had become a shell of its former self. Gone were the days of innovative designs equipping a powerful air British arm and the research and development to deliver more of them. The British government refused to sponsor any public celebrations of the RAF’s 50th anniversary. Even a fancy dinner at the Lancaster House with the Queen was cancelled. This interview with Pollock was uploaded to YouTube by ITV News

[youtube id=”_m9CcvPczcY” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Let’s Do Something for the Commoners

On April 5th Pollock was flying with Number 1 (Fighter) Squadron, Number 38 Group out of RAF West Raynham in Norfolk. He was assigned to fly Hawker Hunter FGA.9 XF442 as one in a flight of four Hawker Hunter jets tasked with several military (not open to the public) flying displays as part of an RAF 50th anniversary celebration. Earlier in the month Pollock had taken part in 50th anniversary leaflet raids on other RAF stations. On April 4th Pollock performed an anniversary display at RAF Tangmere in West Sussex. But there were still no displays planned for the “commoners.”

A Hunter FGA.9 like Alan Pollock flew
Hunter FGA.9 by Tim Felce (Airwolfhound) (Hunter – RIAT 2010) [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

The Perfect Mix of Frustration and Abandon

Pollock’s return flight path to West Raynham took him close to London. Perhaps it was the meds he was taking for a case of pneumonia. Perhaps it was overall low morale and disdain for the lackluster anniversary events. The fact that historic RAF Tangmere was going to be closed down wasn’t helping his mindset. The fact that no flying displays had been planned for the public was almost certainly a factor. That cancelled dinner with the Queen maybe? But whatever the cause, the effect was sensational. Pollock and his squadron mates took off from RAF Tangmere and set course for RAF West Raynham, but soon after takeoff they were no longer a flight of four.

Civilian Hawker Hunter F58 takes off from NAS Key WEst in March 2015
Hunter flying as adversary with ATAC via US Navy

Low and Fast All Over Town…and Then!

Pollock first made low and fast passes over RAF Dunsfold and then made his way to London. Pollock made low and fast passes over several parts of London, including three passes over the Houses of Parliament. He then dipped his wings in salute over the Royal Air Force Memorial. Suddenly he found himself facing the famous Tower Bridge. Unable to resist the temptation to fly between the upper and lower spans of the old bridge, he rang up more than 350 knots and did just that- while avoiding one of the ubiquitous double-decker London buses. Pollock said his years of low-level attack training made the decision to fly through the bridge simple. He became the only pilot to fly a jet through the bridge.

Tower Bridge sunset December 2006
Tower Bridge in London via public domain

Because He Was…Inverted

On his way back to West Raynham, Pollock proceeded to fly over RAF Wattisham, RAF Lakenheath, and RAF Marham. At 400 knots. At 200 feet. Inverted. When Pollock landed back at RAF West Raynham he was promptly arrested by Flying Officer Roger Gilpin and grounded. Number 1 (Fighter) Squadron, RAF, was soon deployed to North Africa without Pollock. The RAF considered court martialing Pollock, but no charges were filed against him by the London police and his actions were not exactly universally frowned upon. Many in the RAF actually supported Pollock’s sentiment if not his expression thereof. The RAF ended up discharging the 32 year old father of four on medical grounds instead. Pollock cleared his name in 1982, having already become a successful businessman in the UK.

Second Gulfstream G550 to Join NOAA’s “Hurricane Hunter” Fleet

We’ve all seen the images on The Weather Channel. When a hurricane is barreling toward the United States, harrowing (yet amazing) images from Hurricane Hunter aircraft inside the eye beam into our living rooms via our television screens.

While Hurricane Hunter aircraft have been around for decades, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) thinks it’s time for another upgrade. 

A second high-altitude jet will be joining NOAA’s Hurricane Hunter fleet, the agency announced this week.  

NOAA’s G550s Will Replace the Older Gulfstream IV-SP

NOAA Gulfstream IV-SP
A NOAA Gulfstream IV-SP takes off from Lakeland Linder International Airport (LAL) | IMAGE: NOAA

NOAA’s new fleet addition is a heavily modified Gulfstream G550, which was awarded the contract to Savannah, Ga.-based Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation. The bipartisan Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law by President Biden in 2022, largely funded the $106 million deal.

NOAA says the new G550 will join the fleet in 2028.

NOAA’s first G550, ordered in 2019, will be delivered early next year, just in time for the 2025 hurricane season. This aircraft will replace the agency’s aging Gulfstream IV-SP, which has been an integral part of the Hurricane Hunter fleet since 1996. The addition of the second G550 will significantly bolster NOAA’s capabilities in hurricane and tropical storm forecasting, atmospheric research, and other critical missions.

Gulfstream Aerospace president Mark Burns says his company has been providing aircraft to the U.S. Government for more than 50 years.

“We are proud to continue the partnership with NOAA’s G550,” Burns said in 2019. “Our aircraft platforms provide government and military customers with the flexibility, range, and altitude capabilities perfect for demanding missions.”

Flying High Above the Storm

Cockpit of NOAA Gulfstream IV-SP
NOAA Gulfstream IV-SP flying high above an atmospheric River system | IMAGE: NOAA

The G550s are not ordinary corporate jets; they are specially modified with advanced systems designed to enhance the accuracy of weather forecasts. A significant feature of these aircraft is the tail-mounted Doppler radar system, which is crucial in collecting high-resolution data. This system, combined with other onboard instruments, allows the G550 to provide data essential for improving the accuracy of tropical storm and hurricane forecasting. 

The Gulfstream G550 boasts impressive specifications, including a range of over 4,000 nautical miles and a maximum altitude of 51,000 feet. With a maximum mission length of approximately 14.5 hours when fully fueled, the G550 can undertake extensive research missions, flying high above weather systems to gather vital data.

The G550s will Complement Low-Altitude Missions

A Gulfstream Hurricane Hunter aircraft under construction in Savannah
A Gulfstream G550 Hurricane Hunter on the assembly line at the Gulfstream facility in Savannah, Ga. | IMAGE: NOAA

While the G550s will operate at high altitudes, providing a top-down view of weather systems, NOAA’s two quad-engine Lockheed WP-3D Orion turboprop aircraft will continue their low-altitude missions. The WP-3D Orions fly directly into storms, collecting data from within the turbulent environments of hurricanes and tropical storms.

This complementary approach ensures a comprehensive collection of data from the upper reaches of the atmosphere, through the eyewall, and even down to the temperature of the ocean surface.

The data collected by the G550s will significantly improve hurricane track and intensity forecasts. According to NOAA, this enhanced forecasting capability will save lives by providing more lead time for tropical forecasts, allowing communities to better prepare for impending storms.

NOAA Will Base the G550s in Lakeland

NOAA AOC Hangar at LAL
NOAA Aircraft Operations Center (AOC) Hangar at Lakeland Linder International Airport (LAL) in Lakeland, Fla. | IMAGE: NOAA

The new G550 will be based at the NOAA Aircraft Operations Center (AOC) at Lakeland Linder International Airport (LAL) in Lakeland, Florida. The AOC has been in Lakeland since 2017 when it moved from MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa. 

The AOC in Lakeland is a hub of activity during hurricane season, coordinating the efforts of NOAA’s fleet of hurricane hunters. The addition of the second G550 will enhance the center’s operational capabilities, allowing for more comprehensive and accurate data collection during critical missions in the Atlantic, Pacific, Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico.

In addition to the Lakeland AOC, NOAA’s Hurricane Hunter fleet works with the U.S. Air Force Reserve’s 53rd Weather Reconnaissance Squadron (WRS), based at Keesler Air Force Base in Biloxi, Miss. 

Ten WC-130J “Super Hercules” Hurricane Hunter aircraft make up the fleet of the 53rd WRS. 

Hurricane Hunter Missions Began in 1946 

Hurricane Hunter
The eye of Hurricane Ida on NOAA WP-3D Orion N43RF Miss Piggy on the morning of 28 August 2021 | IMAGE: NOAA

The first time a crewed mission flew into a hurricane was in 1943. Three years later, Hurricane Hunter missions officially commenced.

Since then, NOAA and the 53rd WRS have flown thousands of missions into some of the fiercest storms on Earth. The data collected on these missions has saved an untold number of lives. 

Those of us in aviation know weather forecasting remains an imperfect science. However, the new G550s will bolster forecasting accuracy and undoubtedly save even more lives.

The F-111’s Long Nose Enabled The Fighters Go In Low And Fast

That Nose! That beautiful long nose!

The F-111’s long nose was integral to its design, enhancing aerodynamic stability and allowing for superior performance during low-altitude missions. This unique feature, combined with the advanced terrain-following radar, positioned the aircraft as a formidable force during its operational tenure.

The innovative swing-wing design further contributed to its versatility and effectiveness in various combat scenarios. Such advancements solidified the F-111’s reputation as a groundbreaking asset in the USAF arsenal.

A Tough Time the First Time Out

The first use of the F-111 in combat was during the Vietnam War. In March of 1968, a detachment of six F-111As was sent to Southeast Asia under the Combat Lancer program.

Three of the six aircraft were lost during just over a month in-country. It was later determined that a design fault in the horizontal stabilizer had caused the losses, which delayed the full operational use of the jet until 1971. In 1972, the F-111 returned to Southeast Asia and racked up 4,000 combat sorties with only six losses directly attributable to enemy action.

F 111F 493 TFS with Pave Tack and GBU 10s 1982
Official US Air Force Photograph

Dropping The F-111s Long Nose In the X Ring

Throughout the remainder of the Vark’s service life, it was a key player in nearly all military operations. When, in 1986, it became necessary to strike Libya, the F-111 was the only jet capable of pulling off the long-range precision strikes needed to execute the Air Force’s tasking for Operation El Dorado Canyon.

During Operation Desert Storm in 1991, the F-111Fs that dropped 80% of the laser-guided bombs were developed from those A models that had first worn Air Force colors twenty years earlier. After Desert Storm, the F-111s didn’t stick around for long. Just five years later, the Air Force retired its last bomber, the Varks, and the dedicated electronic attack EF-111 Spark Varks followed a couple of years after that.

F-111's long nose enabled it to fly unique missions to win conflicts.
Three F-111F Varks and a single EF-111 Spark Vark flying together somewhere hot and sandy. Official US Air Force Photograph.

Additional stories on the F-111 from Avgeekery:

The Aardvark: The F-111 Changed The Strike Game – A comprehensive look at every F-111 variant, from the troubled F-111B Navy fighter to the Australian “Pigs” that flew until 2010.

El Dorado Canyon: President Reagan Sent the Whole Shooting Match After Gaddafi in 1986 – When the F-111 was the only aircraft capable of executing long-range precision strikes against Libya, the Aardvark delivered.

External reading on the F-111 Ardvark:

McDonnell Douglas Intended the Boeing 717 To Be A Family of Jets

0

The Boeing 717 was McDonnell Douglas’ last ‘new’ aircraft that they designed before being acquired by Boeing in 1997.

Originally called the MD-95, the jet was tailor built as a replacement for the venerable DC-9 that was beginning to age out of service at major US and European airlines.

SE DDT DC9 SAS BHX 21 09 1990 32687769974
SAS DC-9, CC 2.0

Major airlines at the time like Northwest, ValuJet (later AirTran), TWA, and SAS all had a sizable fleet of smaller mainline jets, like the DC-9, 737-200, and Fokker 100. McDonnell Douglas (MCD) viewed the MD-95 program as an opportunity to capture this market.

MCD designed a jet that took the best features of the MD-80 and MD-90 programs and fit it into a roughly DC-9-40 sized platform. The jet featured efficient Rolls Royce/BMW BR-715 engines similar to the engines powering Gulfstream’s largest jets at the time and a glass cockpit.

One weak point of this new offering was that MCD decided not to spend the money on a new wing for the jet. This decision limited both the max altitude and range of the jet.

Was the 717 designed to be a one off DC-9-30 replacement?

Northwestdc9
A Northwest DC-9 in the famous “bowling shoe” livery. Photo: AeroIcarus (CC 2.0)

Not really. MCD had plans to offer multiple versions/sizes of the MD-95 family. They first planned to release the MD-95-30 (which became the Boeing 717).

The hope was that the DC-9-30ish size of the jet would spur enough orders from major customers and power a push for additional variants of the 717 family.

Their plan wasn’t crazy. Airlines were also interested in a larger MD-80 sized version of the MD-95. Unfortunately, the merger with Boeing limited the potential success of the MD-95.

What killed the Boeing 717?

After MCD’s merger with Boeing, Boeing publicly committed to building the MD-95. They later renamed it the Boeing 717-200. Boeing also stated that they intended to fulfill all existing orders initially but also market the aircraft for new orders too.

Hawaiian Airlines.Boeing 717 200.HNL .2009
Photo FRED (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Unfortunately for the 717, the timing wasn’t right. Many airlines were knee deep in debt after the tragic events of September 11th and couldn’t afford new aircraft.

Boeing also had a competitor in their own lineup, the Boeing 737-600. The next gen guppy filled a similar niche but offered a ready made family with the larger -700 and -800. All next generation 737s had coast to coast capability, something that the Boeing 717 lacked.

The Boeing 717-300 had an interested buyer though

img 1859 1
Proposed Boeing 717-300, image: Boeing via MD80.net

It was rumored that AirTran was seriously kicking the tires on a larger Boeing 717-300 that would have offered longer range in an MD-80 sized jet. However, it was said that Boeing pushed the company towards a 737-700 purchase instead.

Boeing was also said to offer the Boeing 717-100 to various airlines. However, more tailor-made regional jets already in production by other manufacturers precluded development of the potential Boeing 717 shrink.

The end for the 717

The last Boeing 717 rolled off the assembly line in April of 2006. It was McDonnell Douglas’ last commercial jet ever built. In total, only 156 jets were produced over the length of the program.

Delta Boeing 717 and Southwest Boeing 737-800 on the ramp at KDAL
A Delta Boeing 717 and a Southwest Boeing 737-800 on the ramp at Dallas Love Field (DAL) | IMAGE: Dallas Love Field on Facebook

In the mid-2010s, the 717 did have a bit of a renaissance. Delta acquired a fleet of 717s from Southwest Airlines. The jets proved a great fit for Delta to bring mainline service back to markets that were growing in terms of demand. It was also the perfect jet for customers who were growing tired of regional jets lack of amenities.

The 717 is expected to continue service at airlines like Delta and Hawaiian for at least the next 3-4 years before the limited supply of replacement parts for the jets dry up and make continued service uneconomical.

Musk Says He’s Moving SpaceX to Texas Because of This Reason

0

SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter) CEO Elon Musk announced today that he is moving his companies’ headquarters from California to Texas.

SpaceX was originally founded in 2002 by Musk with a goal to reduce the cost of space transportation via reusable spacecraft. It has since evolved into a multibillion dollar business that has evolved into a company that provides launch services for NASA, the US government, military, and commercial companies. The company also operates Starlink, offering internet globally via a constellation of small satellites.

Why is Musk Moving SpaceX to Texas?

In a post on X today, Musk said that “Because of this law and the many others that preceded it, attacking both families and companies, SpaceX will now move its HQ from Hawthorne, California, to Starbase, Texas.”

Musk is referring to California’s new law AB1955 which addresses the topic of LGBT youth. Most controversial for Musk, part of the bill prevents public schools from making rules that require them to notify a parent if a child identifies as transgender. In a follow up message, Musk added, “I did make it clear to Governor Newsom about a year ago that laws of this nature would force families and companies to leave California to protect their children.”

Musk stated that he will also move X headquarters to Austin, Texas in response to the bill becoming law..

SpaceX Falcon 9 thunders away from Cape Canaveral, sending supplies to Space Station. (Charles Atkeison)
SpaceX Falcon 9 thunders away from Cape Canaveral, sending supplies to Space Station. (Charles Atkeison)

Where is Starbase, Texas?

Starbase, Texas is located in South Texas near the Texas/Mexico border, just outside of Brownsville. It is home to one of SpaceX’s large launch facility. The site has so far launched four Starship test vehicles with additional launches planned later this year. Starship is a massive spacecraft. At nearly 400 ft tall. the vehicle is powered by 33 of the company’s Raptor engines that generate 17 million pounds of thrust at launch.

Starship on the launch pad at Starbase, Texas.  Photo: Mike Killian
Starship on the launch pad at Starbase, Texas. Photo: Mike Killian

This is not the first time that Musk has moved one of his companies headquarters. He previously moved Tesla from Freemont, California to Austin, Texas. He later moved his engineering headquarters back to Palo Alto, California in an effort to recruit additional engineering talent.

Trump’s Second Campaign Plane Unveiled As Trump Selects VP

Campaign unveils new Trump Vance Plane, a Boeing 737-800

President Trump now has a second aircraft for his presidential campaign. It will be used by his vice presidential running partner for campaign events.

A new VP running mate and an additional Boeing for the Trump campaign

It’s been an unprecedented week for the former president. On Saturday, President Trump survived an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Then on Monday, felony charges were dismissed in his classified documents case.

Later in the afternoon, the former President unveiled his Vice Presidential running mate, Senator JD Vance, just prior to the start of the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Senator Vance currently serves as the junior senator from Ohio.

Now, a images of a second jet to join President Trump’s Boeing 757, sometimes referred to as Trump Force One, have appeared.

The plane has a “Trump/Vance” decal on the side

IMG 1693
Photo via @danscavino on x

The Boeing 737 jet was flown to Kansas City International on July 14th . Kansas City is home to a maintenance facility operated by Eastern. Just today, the jet emerged with a temporary livery for the campaign season. The livery features a stylized American flag on the tail with the newly minted Trump/Vance logo on the forward section of the jet.

N917XA is a 2002 Boeing 737-800 originally operated by AirBerlin. The jet was last operated by the now defunct iAero Airways before being purchased by Eastern earlier this year.

First spotted by expert-tracker Jack Sweeney

“The Trump Vance plane looks to be N917XA which is at MCI airport, says Jack Sweeney. Sweeney became famous tracking billionaire Elon Musk’s private jets. Today he unveiled some aircraft sleuthing to identify the location and tail number of the jet. This was solid work because some flight tracker websites showed that the aircraft was still in Miami with a planned flight to Havana, Cuba. Whether that was a technical error or an intentional effort to throw off flight tracker enthusiasts is unknown.

IMG 1378
Photo by Mike killian photography

“Clues: rust on the top of outside hangars is the same, as pictured. 917 matches door number. Eastern airlines logo pictured on the lift,” added Sweeney on X, formerly Twitter.

No Details on Configuration for Trump Vance Plane

No details have been released yet about the configuration of the jet. Typically, candidate’s aircraft have a mixed configuration of first class seats up front along with a couch/lounge for meetings. The aft section of the aircraft is configured with coach seats for staffers and media.

That Time The High Rollers RF-4C Phantoms Roared Just Feet Over Nevada’s Pyramid Lake

The High Rollers Had Themselves a Great Time Just Doing a Little Showing Off

The 192nd Tactical Reconnaissance Squadron (TRS) High Rollers of the Nevada Air National Guard (ANG) stood up and became operational in 1961. Originally equipped with Martin RB-57G Canberras, the High Rollers provided tactical reconnaissance for 34 years. They were placed on alert during the 1961 Berlin Crisis and 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, but not deployed. In 1965, the squadron received their first McDonnell RF-101 Voodoos, which they would fly for the next ten years. In 1968, the High Rollers were called up and deployed in support of the surge that occurred as a result of the Pueblo Crisis.

DF ST 88 04948a
image via national archives

Vagabond Unit Earns Outstanding Unit Award

The 192nd rolled up some frequent flyer miles during their year of active duty, deploying to Korea, Japan, Vietnam, Thailand, the Philippines, North Africa and some 18 Air Force Bases (AFBs) within the United States. As a result of their outstanding efforts, the High Rollers became only the second unit awarded the 5th Air Force Outstanding Unit Award.

[youtube id=”9khQr1iOPfs” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

(Video posted on YouTube by F4Flys)

The 192nd TRS began operating the RF-4C Phantom II in 1975. The 192nd operated the Photo Phantom for the next twenty years. During this period, the High Rollers deployed to the Gulf in support of Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. The squadron was based out of Doha International Airport in Qatar and flew 350 combat sorties totaling more than 1000 combat hours with no losses. The 192nd was instrumental in the determination of locations and dispositions of the Iraqi Republican Guard units in the desert.  Baghdad was also a frequent destination where the cameras sought out chemical weapons plants, rocket fuel plants, and command and communications centers.

The High Rollers RF-4C Phantoms Roared Just Feet Over Nevada's Pyramid Lake
Official US Air Force Photograph

Later, the RF-4Cs of the High Rollers were tasked with Scud hunting as the Iraqis began lobbing the missiles from remote, hidden, or temporary sites all over western Iraq. The Desert Storm take from the 192nd totaled over 19,000 prints from 300,000 feet of exposed film. After Desert Storm concluded, the 192nd TRS came home and was slowly but steadily retired from ANG service.

The last four High Rollers RF-4C Phantom IIs, combat veterans all, and the last operational RF-4Cs in the entire Air Force, were flown from their Reno Air National Guard Base facility at Reno-Tahoe International Airport to the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB in Arizona during September of 1995. Thanks go to YouTuber F4Flys for uploading the videos.

That Time The High Rollers RF-4C Phantoms Roared Just Feet Over Nevada's Pyramid Lake
Official US Air Force Photograph
RELATED: What Made The Phabulous F-4 Phantom So Special to Phantom Phanatics All Over The World?

BONUS Video: The 192nd flies a 4-ship over the Nevada landscape. This video includes radio calls.

[youtube id=”-dhj9sz8hEo” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]