Home Blog Page 110

Why is it So Freaking Cold (or Hot) on my Plane?

3

You get to the airport parking lot, run to catch your shuttle, make it through the TSA body cavity search, and then schlep your stuff a thousand yards to the gate. You board and heave your rollaboard into the overhead bin. After finally sitting down you notice two things: you are drenched in sweat and there is almost no air coming out of the vents. Or if there is air, it is warm.

Or perhaps it’s July and you have a light shirt and slacks on for your trip but have brought no jacket. But shortly after takeoff you notice that it’s cold in the cabin. I mean really cold. Your hands are blue and you are shivering.

So why the heck can the airlines never seem to get the temperature right? How difficult can it be?

As it turns out, getting it right is more difficult than you would think. This issue has about 85 moving parts involving both human and mechanical factors. I’d like to go over each aspect of what goes wrong, but first let me give you a quick description of the systems in place which provide heating and cooling aboard your aircraft.

Heating and Cooling At the Gate

In years gone by, heating and cooling at the gate were mostly provided by running a unit on board the aircraft known as the auxiliary power unit or APU. This is a small turbine engine usually mounted in the tail which provides both electrical and hydraulic power for use during preflight and also pressurized air to run the air conditioning or heating system.

It generally worked well but consumed a lot of fuel and the technique was eventually replaced by the use of large heating and cooling units mounted directly on or near the jet bridge. Ground crews are required to attach a large air hose to the belly of the aircraft to allow this unit to heat or cool the interior of the plane. The systems are either programmed to provide a preset temperature or a temperature probe might be hung in the cabin to provide feedback to the system.737air

Cooling and Heating While Under Way

After the airplane is away from the gate and under its own power, all heating and cooling is provided by onboard systems which are powered by compressed air from the engines. These onboard units are known as pneumatic air cycle machines or PACs (on Boeing aircraft) and not only provide heating and cooling but also pressurization to the cabin while at altitude.

Without going too far down the rabbit hole concerning Carnot cycles and thermodynamic flow equations, suffice it to say that the units take hot compressed air from the engines and make cold air out of it or use the hot air directly for heat. Yes, all the air that you’re breathing on an airplane is brought in through the mouth of the engines. It is also why an engine malfunction can quickly fill the cabin with smoke, but that’s a topic for another time.

After going through some plumbing and a water separator, the air is distributed to the cabin through ducting and the gasper outlets, which are those little twisty vents over your seat. The system temperature is controlled through the use of a thermostat which is usually located in the cockpit. It is supposed to be a “set and forget” type of arrangement which should always provide a comfortable temperature over a range of aircraft operating states such as taxi, climb, cruise, or descent.

At least that’s how it is supposed to work. Let’s now take a look at the many things that can go wrong to make you miserable:

Human Factor Errors

One of the basic problems concerning complex feedback systems is that the user…you freezing or sweating in your seat…is not the controller. A systems engineer might say the feedback loop of this control system is in an open state. My suggestion is that you attempt to close the loop by hitting your call button and complaining. Many times certain parts of the plane may be warmer or cooler than others. The galley where the flight attendants spend most of their time may be fine. Let them know that you are not fine.

Another issue could be that the user is feeling perfectly fine, but that person is not you, it is a flight attendant. They are the ones who call the cockpit to request a warmer or cooler temperature. On some airplanes, they can control the temperature directly. Remember, they are constantly on their feet and are likely to appreciate a cooler cabin than you sitting in your seat motionless. Again, if no one complains, they have no way of knowing.

Southwest Air pilots I flew on three different planes duri… Flickr
Pilots are great people who might not be aware that you are uncomfortable.
Photo by Liz West. https://www.flickr.com/photos/calliope

The same dynamic is true for the pilots. If they don’t hear any complaints from the back, they’ll just assume everything is OK. And speaking of pilots, they are sitting up front in a glass house. It is the guy in the right seat who controls the temperature, so if he is on the sunny side of the airplane and is warm, he’ll just dial it down.

Another thing I’ve noticed is that some folks just naturally run cold or hot. Heavier people seem to like it cooler than thin people. So if your first officer appears as an endomorph and is sitting on the sunny side of the plane, that may explain why you’re freezing in your seat. Again, hit that call button and complain.

Operator Errors

ground crew MROC SJO click on top right arrows to enla… Bernal Saborio Flickr
Photo by Bernal Saborio https://www.flickr.com/photos/44073224@N04/28809123780

Another class of error in temperature control might be classified as operator errors. For instance, on a coolish spring or fall day the ground crews may simply neglect to connect the air hose thinking that the temperature outside is cool so it must be OK inside the airplane. What they don’t realize is that several hundred bodies in an aluminum tube will always result in a stuffy cabin even on the coldest of days. This problem is compounded when the pilots fail to look out the window to see a folded up or deflated air hose. The solution is to start the APU and get some air flowing.

Being a commuter, this is my personal pet peeve. We have a certain set of pilots who mean well but have their priorities askew. They are reluctant to start the APU because they’ve been told that it uses too much fuel, so in this situation they will call station operations on the radio to request that the ground air be hooked up. Station operations will then call the ramp agent who’s probably loading bags and now has to stop what he’s doing to hook up the air. All this might take five minutes. And surely you won’t mind going into your meeting with sweat stains on your shirt.

My technique is to reach up and to start the APU, get some air to the customers, and to then perhaps chase down why the ground air isn’t hooked up or working. Most jet bridges are owned by the airport authority which is usually a city-owned bureaucracy. If they are out of service for maintenance, making a call to get them fixed is literally the same as calling city hall to get a pothole fixed. Good luck with that.

I was even once parked at a gate without a working APU, so the only source of air was the ground unit. As I sat there in a full airplane on a summer day, a city crew pulled up, turned off the unit, and before I could shout at them, drained the coolant out of it to perform some maintenance. When I asked them if they noticed this big blue thing with wings and engines sitting there, the answer back was that they had their orders and didn’t know nuthin about no airplanes. Luckily we were close to pushback, but this is part of the impenetrable stupidity that makes the job so enjoyable.

Lastly, sometimes the system is either overwhelmed such as waiting for takeoff on a 110 degree day in Phoenix with a full airplane, or it simply doesn’t perform as expected. There’s not much that can be done about the former, but if the system won’t heat or cool properly, it needs to be written up and fixed. This can take some time.

In Conclusion

The heating and cooling systems on jet aircraft are charged with keeping you comfortable while the temperature outside the aircraft can range from over 100 degrees to 50 degrees below zero at altitude. They usually do a pretty good job but have their limits mainly due to human or mechanical error. The best thing you can do to ensure a comfortable ride is to speak up…and to bring a jacket.

WATCH: The Film That Made the Thunderbolt Even More Famous

The 57th FG Made History in the MTO. Along the Way They Made a Movie

Our film for today is William Wyler’s “Thunderbolt”, shot during 1944 in the Mediterranean Theater of Operations (MTO) by the Army Air Forces and released to the military in 1945 and to the public in 1947. Starring P-47D Thunderbolts and their pilots flying missions from Alto Air Base on Corsica and their supporting personnel, the film begins with an explanation of how the footage was shot. Army Air Forces B-24 pilot Jimmy Stewart introduces the picture. Our thanks to Manic Movies for uploading the film.

[youtube id=”Da_gbVd6nzM” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Like War Itself This is Not Always Pretty

The footage is not all pleasant. You should be aware that the film, shot and produced during wartime, wastes little time before getting to the meat of the issue in Italy during the war. However, there is no better way to get a feel for the war, particularly the air war, and how it was fought in that part of the world. The P-47 Thunderbolt, also known as Jug, was a punishing fighter-bomber well suited to the kind of war in the air being fought in the MTO. Footage from this film was used in several other films and movies. You’ll probably recognize some of it.tbolt3

The Vagabond 57th FG Lineup

The group featured in the film is the 57th Fighter Group, consisting of the 64th Fighter Squadron Black Scorpions, the 65th Fighter Squadron Fighting Cocks, and the 66th Fighter Squadron Exterminators. The film also mentions that the 57th Fighter Group moved 58 times in two years. That seems like a lot of moves but having started out flying P-40Fs in North Africa during 1942 it seems entirely plausible that the Group moved many times. The 57th moved to Corsica on March 30th 1944.tbolt4

Fame From a Merciless Fight

Earlier, while stationed in North Africa flying P-40Ks, the 57th participated in the April 1943 aerial battle over the Gulf of Tunis at Cape Bon known as Operation Flax. The group destroyed approximately 74 enemy transports and fighters. Nearly that many more enemy aircraft were lost when they attempted to ditch at sea or crash land on beaches in the area. This action became known as the “Goose Shoot” or “The Palm Sunday Massacre.”tbolt5

How to Earn a Distinguished Unit Citation

As you will see in the film, the 57th flew missions at a hectic pace, averaging about 48 sorties per day against railroads, lines of communication, and vehicular transportation targets- primarily behind enemy lines. The 57th earned a Distinguished Unit Citation during the time Wyler was filming for their attacks against the German forces in the Florence-Arezzo area. Later the Group flew missions in the French campaign against Elba in June 1944 and later during the invasion of Southern France.

USAAF 42 28307 P 47D Thunderbolt 12AF 57FG66FS 33 Lil Aabner 01

Strangling Supply Lines

The 57th flew many of their missions in support of Operation Strangle, an air interdiction effort with the goal of preventing essential supplies from reaching German forces in central Italy and to compel a German withdrawal. For operations in the MTO, the 57th Fighter Group earned three Distinguished Unit Citations and the French Croix de Guerre (Cross of War) with Palm (awarded in late 1967). We hope you enjoy “Thunderbolt!”

Breitling Jet Team announce 2017 European Tour schedule

The world’s largest civilian jet team released their 2017 European Tour schedule this week as the Breitling Jet Team return to Europe’s top airshows following their successful two year tour of North America.

The formation flying of the Breitling’s seven black and metal gray L-39C Albatros aircraft will provide a timeless beauty in formation flying as they go smoke-on during their summer long performance. Breitling’s 20 minute aerobatic flight will showcase many original maneuvers created by the pilots themselves as their seven jets demonstrate dynamic maneuvers both high and low over the airfield.

Like the watch and chronograph manufacturer who sponsors the team, the Breitling jets will perform with aerobatic precision beginning high above the Czech Republic on June 3 and 4. The team’s 12-show site European Tour will have the team perform in Norway, Italy, France, the United Kingdom, and Belgium.

“We can proudly announce that we were able to contact and put Breitling Jet Team in the program,” said Jan Rudzinskyj, one of several organizers of the Pardubice Airshow in the Czech Republic. “The fact that the French have responded to our demand, certainly testifies to the importance of the Czech Aviation fair among Europe. This year our visitors will see a very dynamic performance of the six jets group.”

Headquartered in Dijon, France, the jet team has been sponsored by the Swiss watch manufacturer Breitling since 2003 due in part by the company’s rich history in aviation. Breitling watches were strapped to the wrists of many aviation pioneers, and even kept time for NASA’s astronauts en route to the Moon.

breit1

Jacque Bothelin, whose pilot call sign is “Speedy”, leads the team both in the air and on the ground. Pilots Bernard Charbonnel, Christophe Deketelaere, Francois Ponsot, Georges-Eric Castaing, Paco Wallaert, and Patrick Marchand perform together in close formation, and at times with two of the jet aircraft performing a specific maneuver such as the Opposite Barrel Roll.

Breitling’s L-39C Albatros jet’s can pull nearly eight times the force of gravity, and soar up to near the speed of sound. The black color of the jet’s fuselage can highlight each maneuver followed by smoke trails created during many of their maneuvers. Most spectators say they look like missiles streaking across the deep blue sky.”My favorite Breitling maneuver is the Apache Roll,” said pilot “Gaston” Marchand as he stood poised near his #7 aircraft. “It was created by Bothelin and has been duplicated by many jet teams around the world. It is a maneuver where four jets are flying within ten feet of each other and I am in Jet 7 doing barrel rolls around the formation. It’s always a favorite of fans and we often get a great applause from the crowd during this maneuver.”

Flying in close formation, the jets are about three meters apart as they soar at speeds of nearly 700 km per hour. Breitling explains that the pilots demonstrate mutual trust gained after years of working together. “The pilots think, operate and react as a single being, with as main concern for the safety of everyone.”

breit3
Breitling’s Jets align in several fascinating formations high overhead during the airshow. The Blackbird has jet one aligned in front of the six jets delta formation; and the Chronomat displays jets one, three, and five aligned nose to rear with jets seven, four, two, and six making up the wings on either side. The popular Rocket formation has three jets aligned nose to rear with two jets behind and on wither side of the alignment.Most of Breitling’s pilots have sharpened their aviation and aerobatic skills as fighter pilots while in the French Air Force. Each one having over 4,600 hours of jet time in such European aircraft as the Alpha Jet, Jaguar, and the popular Mirage F1.

Breitling’s right outside wingman Paco Wallaert served 22 years in the French Air Force both as fighter pilot and as aerobatic pilot for four years in the Patrouille de France — France’s military version of the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds. He spoke of his transition to Breitling at the same time he moved back into civilian life.

“Breitling’s not flying five or six jets, but seven which is quite unique as a civilian jet team,” Paco stated to this aerospace journalist recently. “I’m not a fighter pilot anymore, but I’m a jet pilot as a civilian. So I feel very fortunate to still fly in jets and above all with Breitling.”

The Breitling jets have returned to European airshows fresh from a two-year visit across North America. Their U.S. popularity in 2015-16 became a top draw at most show sites as they wow’ed the crowds prior to the Blue Angels and Air Force Thunderbirds.

Visit breitling-jet-team.com for the team’s full schedule, and get a close up look at each of the skilled pilots and their aircraft.
(Charles Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media @Military_Flight.)

The Curious Case of Dr. Dao On A United Express Jet

1

An airline pilot separates emotion from facts and breaks down the case.

By now we’ve all heard of the events on United Express Flight 3411 wherein a passenger refused to deplane to accommodate some deadheading crew and was eventually dragged off the aircraft by Chicago law enforcement officers. The passenger, Dr. David Dao, suffered some injuries including two broken teeth and had to be treated in a hospital following his forceful removal from the aircraft.

As this is an aviation blog, and before I bury the lede too far, I’d like to look at this event from the aspect of what the pilots could or should have done. The answer is much less than you might expect given that the airplane was parked at the gate and that there were no safety concerns. In spite of what a few keyboard warriors hanging around my blog may assert, federal law concerning pilot authority is quite clear on the limits to a pilot’s responsibility and authority.

But before I dig into that, let’s review the story as it stands so far, shall we?

The incident was captured on various personal devices for our enjoyment and the internet predictably blew up on cue. Many hot takes were given, much outrage was expressed, and many gallons of ink were spilled as everyone who could form an opinion, valid or not, did so. Here are just a few.

Everyone has gotten in on the act

The entire sovereign nation of China, one of United’s largest destinations by customer count, wasted no time in ginning up the indignation sirens claiming that Dr. Dao’s shabby treatment was a result of racial animus against persons of Chinese descent. This had to be revised to accusations of a general anti-Asian bias when it was revealed that the good doctor is of Vietnamese extraction. (The incident was nothing of the sort, and it would be nice if racism wasn’t the knee-jerk go-to explanation for everything under the sun.)

Economists have weighed in on the economics of offering money to entice people to give up their seats. There’s a good reason that economics is called the dismal science, as my head hurts after reading about all the game theory that applies. Perhaps United should have just upped the ante of cash offered. Eventually someone would have taken the deal.

Legal eagles have offered advice concerning the fine print that is contained in the contract of carriage which all passengers agree to when purchasing a ticket. One aviation lawyer I found believes that the airline was justified in removing the doctor as his opinion is that no property right is created through the purchase of a ticket. Another lawyer blog believes otherwise stating that United did not correctly follow its own directives. In the end, it will come down to precedent, case law, and the legal interpretation of words such as “boarded” and “oversold”. The doctor has hired a competent lawyer and is planning on suing everyone in sight. My personal view is that while United may win the legal battle, it long ago lost the PR war.

From a law enforcement point of view, three officers from the Chicago Department of Aviation, were the ones who removed the doctor from the plane. The doctor resisted their efforts and in the process of this resistance hit his face on an armrest resulting in his injuries. At least one of the officers has been placed on leave for not following standard operating procedure (SOP). While I have no doubt that an investigation will determine whether SOP was followed or not, it seems to me that if a 69 year old man can’t be removed from an airplane without being bloodied then perhaps they were doing it wrong. On the other hand, resisting law enforcement is never a good idea.

Civil libertarians of course see this as one more road sign along the route to the coming police state. I’m not so sure that this incident is reflective of an improper use of law enforcement. After all, should you plant yourself on a couch at Macy’s at closing time and refuse to move, you will likely be escorted off the property by some form of law enforcement given enough time. United for its part has forsworn the future use of law enforcement to remove passengers. I think I can safely predict a new class of delay as passengers refuse to disembark for this reason or that and nothing gets done.

For some homespun humor and common sense about the incident we turn to Mike Rowe who points out that a simple appeal to reason would have quickly resolved the problem.

Lastly, many are pointing out that the good doctor himself has a somewhat shady past involving drugs and sex which cost him his medical license for a while. Even the doctor’s story as to why it was important for him not to be removed was not quite true. So what does this have to do with anything that happened on the airplane? Absolutely nothing. Nothing, that is, unless you are a lawyer trying to paint the doctor as a quick witted grifter who intentionally acted out in search of a pay out. It will be left to the lawyers, judges, and jurors to sort that one out.

Pilot’s Authority

The pilots of United were quick to point out that this incident actually took place on a Republic Airways owned and operated flight hoping to avoid association with the affair. That’s some facile reasoning as the airplanes are branded with the United brand and the Republic employees are clothed in United uniforms. But the pilots probably shouldn’t be so defensive. The pilots on that plane likely had zero input into any of the events that transpired. They may not even have known what was going on until the police arrived.

This of course brings us back to the topic of what the pilots could or should have done. There may have been a time in the distant past where pilots were expected to exercise authority over every aspect of the operation. Think back to, say, a Pan Am Model 314 making its way around the Pacific Rim in 1939. Back then the captain was the chief customer service agent and company representative. He had to be. There was no one else around.

Today things are different. Ticket agents, operations agents, boarding agents, customer service agents, ground operations supervisors, and the big kahuna, complaint resolution officials control nearly all aspects of airline customer service while the airplane is parked at the gate. They decide who goes on and who gets pulled off. The pilots do not.

Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) are quite clear on this matter. Here’s the relevant text:

 §91.3   Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command.

(a) The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft.

(b) In an in-flight emergency requiring immediate action, the pilot in command may deviate from any rule of this part to the extent required to meet that emergency.

In case you were wondering, the term “operation of that aircraft” does not include who gets denied boarding while parked at the gate. Do pilots have any input into this process at all? Yes, but only from a safety or security point of view.

For instance, should a flight attendant inform me that a customer appears to be inebriated during boarding, it is my responsibility to make sure we don’t fly with an inebriated passenger, which is a violation of FARs. However I have been given zero training in recognizing the signs of inebriation. Perhaps the passenger has a medical condition or just took a pill to help with anxiety. I don’t have the slightest way to tell.

Fortunately, the airline has hired and trained individuals who do have the expertise to make such a call. In fact all airlines expect their hired and trained experts to handle such customer service issues. Any pilot who came charging out of the cockpit to throw a passenger off for anything other than a clear safety issue would quickly find himself in the chief pilot’s office making arrangements for an unpaid vacation or the target of a discrimination lawsuit or both.

In the case of a mis-boarded passenger as was the case here, pilots have little or no input. Oh sure, pilots can offer an opinion, but customer service issues are the purview of customer service agents. And once law enforcement arrives to remove a passenger at the direction of ground operations, pilots again have zero official input.

In Conclusion

 United airlines unwittingly touched the third rail of customer dissatisfaction by becoming a lighting rod for an ocean of pent up frustration concerning airline passenger treatment (to mix metaphors). This frustration is no doubt heavily contributed to by the goons running the TSA, but it is the airlines’ problem to solve. All airlines should do themselves a big favor by using this unfortunate incident to take a good look in the mirror and to ask themselves why their customers are so ready to grab the pitchforks when it comes to customer service. Incidents like this don’t help.

Operation Eagle Claw: The Rescue Mission That Died in the Desert

Sweeping Changes in the Special Operations Community Resulted from the Deadly Debacle at Desert One.

During the night of 24 April and into the morning of 25 April 1980, Operation Eagle Claw went from a daring and innovative rescue operation to bring home the 52 American hostages held by Iran to a failed mission that changed the way the American military conducted such missions. The failure of Operation Eagle Claw is also considered to be at least in part responsible for the ascendance of Ronald Reagan to the White House in 1980.eagle2

Setting the Scene

Three weeks before the rescue mission was to take place a very remote airfield in the Iranian desert was surveyed and infrared lights and strobes placed to assist pilots landing at the site. The field itself was checked and determined to be hard-packed sand- perfectly suitable for the rescue aircraft. The operational plan dictated that the site, dubbed “Desert One” would be secured by United States Army Delta Force and Rangers operators and about 6,000 gallons of jet fuel for the helos would be pre-positioned there.

eagle3

Putting the Pieces in Place

US Air Force assets were the three Lockheed EC-130E Commando Solos, using the call signs Republic 4, 5, and 6, and the three MC-130E Combat Talon 1s, using the call signs Dragon 1, 2, and 3. The EC-130Es carried fuel bladders and personnel. MC-130Es carried personnel, supplies, and equipment. Eight US Navy RH-53D Sea Stallions normally assigned to Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron (HM)-16 Seahawks and HM-14 Vanguard went aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN-68). Ostensibly aboard the carrier for a minesweeping mission, the helos were thoroughly checked and rechecked by their combined Navy and Marine Corps crews. They would use the call signs Bluebeard 1 through 8.

eagle4

A Not-So Simple Plan

The overall plan was to fly to Desert One, refuel, then continue on to Desert Two, located 52 miles from Tehran. The American force would overnight at Desert Two and conduct the actual rescue the second day. The plan became more daring and risky with each hour. The Delta operators would drive from Desert Two to the American Embassy in Tehran to free the hostages. Army Rangers were to capture a nearby air base where Lockheed C-141 Starlifters would land, grab the hostages and their rescuers, and depart Iran. Other US Army troops were tasked with disabling electrical power. Even USAF AC-130 Spectre gunships would get in on the action by providing on-call close support of troops in contact on the ground in the Tehran area.

eagle5

War Paint

Aboard the Nimitz and the aircraft carrier USS Coral Sea (CVA-43), efforts were underway to avoid blue-on-blue (friendly fire) accidents. The Iranians were also operating Grumman F-14A Tomcats and McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom IIs at the time. Because they were tasked to provide air cover over Tehran, the similar Navy and Marine carrier-based aircraft were adorned with “invasion stripes” by the crews. Carrier Air Wing 8 (CVW-8) aboard Nimitz and CVW-14 aboard Coral Sea painted these stripes on the upper and lower surfaces of the right wings of their aircraft.

eagle6

Invasion Stripes

Fighter Squadron (VF)-41 Black Aces and VF-84 Jolly Rogers used red and yellow stripes on their F-14A Tomcats. Attack Squadron (VA)-35 Black Panthers and Light Attack Squadron (VA)-82 Marauders and VA-86 Sidewinders aboard Nimitz painted orange stripes on their A-6E Intruders and A-7E Corsair IIs. Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA)-323 Death Rattlers and VMFA-531 Grey Ghosts painted red and yellow stripes on their F-4N Phantom IIs. VA-196 Main Battery and VA-27 Royal Maces and VA-97 Warhawks aboard Coral Sea painted orange stripes on their A-6E Intruders and A-7E Corsair IIs. All stripes were bordered with thin black stripes.eagle7

Off to a Good Enough Start

Things started out well. Departing from Masirah in Oman, the airlifters negotiated the first leg of their mission well. Except for some damage to one of the MC-130Es (Dragon 1) caused by a hard landing (the aircraft remained flyable), the protection personnel and some additional troops landed without incident after dodging habitation and the Zagros Mountains. The American troops on the ground deep within Iran prepared the site for the arrival of the Navy helos. The second two MC-130Es landed and offloaded the personnel and equipment aboard, and then returned to base in Oman to prepare for the next night’s missions. It was at this point that the operation began to unravel.eagle8

Why There? Why Then?

A tanker truck smuggling fuel came upon the site and was blown up by a Ranger team controlling the roads in the area. Although not a specific threat to the mission, the explosion and fire brought the clandestine site to the attention of everyone within miles. The incoming helos even used it to help them find Desert One. Soon thereafter, at roughly 2130 local time, a bus appeared on the scene driving on what was to be used as a runway. As a civilian vehicle it was stopped and the 40-plus passengers held. It was about time for the helos, or what was left of them, to arrive.

eagle9

Dominoes Start to Topple

The first hint of trouble was aboard Bluebeard 6. The crew received a sensor notification that a rotor blade was cracked. Bluebeard 6 was sanitized of all material that might give the mission away and then abandoned in the Iranian desert. Bluebird 8 picked up the crew and continued toward Desert One. The other helos then encountered first a small, and then a much larger, “haboob”, essentially a hundred mile long persistent dust storm suspended in the air up to thousands of feet high. Unable to avoid these dangerous weather phenomena, Bluebeards flew through them both. Bluebeard 5 turned around and landed but the other helos did observe not them land. Bluebeard 5 eventually took off and headed toward Desert One. Another Bluebeard was forced to return to base (RTB) with instrumentation problems. This left six of the original Bluebeards available for the airlift to Desert 2. Ironically the Air Force airlifters had encountered the haboobs but failed to pass word to the helos inbound to Desert One.eagle10

For the Rest of the Operation Eagle Claw story bang NEXT PAGE below.

Extremely Hard Landing Of Jumbo Boeing Jet Caught On Tape

Wow…Glad I wasn’t on that flight.

It’s one of the those hold your breath videos.  A Massive Boeing 747-400 cargo jet operated by Silkway Airlines landed, err…smashed into the runway at Shiphol International Airport last month.  The jet appeared to encounter a large sink rate during its flare.  Instead of going around, the jet continued and hit the ground with a vengeance.  It hit so hard that the jumbo Boeing bounced at least 20 feet back into the air.  The pilot then stabilized the jet and landed with a seat cushion still attached to his backside.

Why didn’t they go around?

I’m not sure actually.  If a pilot encounters a severe downdraft (caused by weather or wake turbulence), the typical reaction is to get out of the situation–execute a go-around–and try again with a more stable approach.

The good news is that while the jet probably needed a hard landing inspection, it looks like no one was hurt in the incident, save for a bruised ego and YouTube infamy.

The first video is by ddb.aviation.
The second video of the same landing is shot by Dutch Spotter.

silkway400

Starliner 75 Is One Strikingly Beautiful Jet

Starliner 75
Starliner 75 on takeoff roll in SEA. Photo by Joe Vaeth

If you’re holding short in Seattle or flying through the Pacific Northwest or Alaska then you may see this Alaska Airlines Boeing 737-800. It has even been spotted as far south as Hawaii. “Starliner 75” was unveiled in 2007 to celebrate Alaska Airlines’ 75th anniversary. It’s vintage paint job is from the 1940’s and the aircraft made its inaugural flight was from Seattle to Anchorage.

The design for “Starliner 75” was selected by the Alaska Airlines employees by popular vote from a listing of four other historical liveries. These included the 1950s Blue Thunderbird, early 1960s Red Thunderbird & late 1960s Golden Nugget designs.starliner AAG

A good vintage
The livery was orginally introduced in 1945 when Alaska Star Airlines changed its name to Alaska Airlines. The 2007 paint job features an original Alaska Airlines logo, map of Alaska with the North Star, 75th anniversary logo on the tail, 1940s Boeing logo – near nose, and blue star prominently displayed on her nose.

Aviation Pioneers on America’s Last Frontier
Alaska Airlines grew from a single aircraft operation in 1932 originally providing charter service between Anchorage and Bristol Bay known as Mc Gee Airways. This operation was one of the first commercial outfits to make use of 2-way radios to monitor weather conditions and optimize loads. In 1935 the two bush operators Star Air Service and Mc Gee Airways merged and took the name Star Air Lines. After the merger the aircraft all started sporting a bright white star on the fuselage. The airline would later beat out a competitor by name of Art Woodley over a matter of $15 to claim the name Alaska Airlines. Woodley’s attorney neglected to include a check to cover the $15 filing fee and the rest is now history. Star Air Service incorporated under the name Alaska Airlines in 1944.

Alaska Airlines has grown from a single aircraft operation in 1932 to be the fifth largest U.S. carrier, serving 118 destinations.  They recently acquired Virgin America.

https://www.alaskaair.com/content/travel-info/our-aircraft/738-starliner.aspx

 

aircraft680 livery starliner738

 

Fatal U2 Crash in CA Last Year Blamed on Student Pilot Error

A tragic error by a student pilot on his first U-2 training flight killed instructor Lt. Col. Ira Steve “Shooter” Eadie last September in Northern California, according to the results of a U.S. Air Force accident investigation report released this week.

The aircraft, a TU-2S assigned to the 1st Reconnaissance Squadron, part of the 9th Reconnaissance Wing at Beale Air Force Base, was conducting an “acceptance flight” training mission, the first of three for the trainee, which is standard practice for potential new U-2 pilots to familiarize themselves with operation of the aircraft under the supervision of a highly-experienced instructor.

According to the report, the student pilot (whom will remain unnamed per USAF privacy policy) was performing an “approach to stall” maneuver when he accidentally put the bird into an unintentional secondary stall while trying to recover from the first.

The aircraft actually performed the simulated stall 3 times. The first stall went well (flown by the student), while the second was flown by Eadie to show the student “less aggressive” use of controls and smoother yoke movement.

The fatal mistake occurred on the third try.image 1

During the training maneuver, the engine isn’t actually shut down, but instead goes into an “aerodynamic stall”, requiring the pilot to drop the nose and gain velocity to generate enough lift to stabilize the aircraft and resume safe flight.

The fatal error occurred because the student pulled out of the simulated stall too quickly and demanded too much vertical movement, before the spy plane known as Dragon Lady was capable of safely flying again.

The $32 million aircraft then went into a sharp left wing drop and excessive nose-low attitude; the crew was no longer in control, and was rolling upside down while also approaching the minimum uncontrolled ejection altitude.

At this point, Lt. Col. Eadie calmly gave the command to EJECT, and while his student pilot bailed out safely with minor injuries, Eadie himself slammed into the plane’s right wing, breaking off a 5-foot chunk of it and resulting in his death.

Eadie’s lap belt may not have been secured when he ejected too, based off burn analysis on the belt.

image
Lt Col. Eadie perished in the crash. (Photo: USAF)

The aircraft crashed into uninhabited grassy foothills south of the Sutter Buttes mountain range in the Sacramento Valley, and while nobody on the ground was injured the crash did set off a 250-acre wildfire.

“The purpose of this report was to identify the causes and contributing factors which may have contributed to the incident,” said Brig. Gen. David S. Nahom, president of the Accident Investigation Board. “This was a terrible tragedy, and our heartfelt condolences go out to Lt. Col. Eadie’s family.”

Eadie, a Florida native, was a 20-year military veteran of both the Navy and USAF, father of six and grandfather of a baby girl.

His student pilot has since recovered from his injuries and completed the necessary training required to pilot the U-2, and is doing so now.

Tiger Flight Foundation is Educating Today’s Youth Through Aviation

0

ROME, GA — Education is soaring to new heights as the Tiger Flight Foundation teaches children to set goals and to take a more active approach in controlling their own life, both on the ground and in the air.

Classroom sessions and flights by several tiger striped aircraft are inspiring preteens and teenagers from Georgia, Tennessee and Alabama to find specific ways to work harder to better themselves. Tiger Flight is also introducing a strong interest in aviation to many preparing to enter high school.

“Leading the young to the dream of flight” is the foundation’s quest as the nonprofit organization steers young adults in becoming successful individuals and taking “command of their own lives”.

tiger2

Based at the Richard B. Russell Airport near Rome, Tiger Flight’s roots began seventeen years ago as two metro Atlanta pilots looked to form a civilian flight team. The foundation has since grown to include a Formation Flight Team, an education workshop, and an aviation museum open inside a World War II hanger at the airport.

“We began in 2000 and the main purpose of Tiger Flight is really motivation helping boys and girls to become pilots in command of their own lives,” explains Robert Young, the foundation’s Chairman of the Board. “We use the airplanes as a hook to get them up in the airplane and to give them enthusiasm and excitement.”

tiger3

The non-profit organization expanded from being a stand alone flight team to begin including discussions to motivate preteens and teens to take charge of their lives in 2006.

“Taking responsibility, believing in themselves, setting goals, measuring their results, putting a plan together,” states Phil “Sunny” Cataldo who realized the concept of adding the educational resource. “Suddenly, Tiger Flight became a children’s motivational program along with being a formation flight team.”

During an April visit, this aerospace reporter arrived at Russell Airport in time to see three orange with black tiger stripes Alon A-2 Aircoupes aircraft soar across the blue morning sky. On board each aircraft was a young adult interested in the possibility of becoming a pilot, or working as a student with the goal of an aviation career.

Rachel, an eighth grader who lives in Chattanooga, took flight for the first time through Tiger Flight and was thrilled by the experience on this spring morning, “Riding in the aircraft was very cool and enjoyable as we sped down the runway, and then my entire life changed — we were flying!”

Rachel joined fifteen fellow young adults who flew that day, and added that she would love to fly again. Young adds that several of the pilots visit classrooms across north Georgia as they give their Pilot in Command motivational talk to inspire children new to aviation.

tiger4

The flight team performed during the Thunder in the Valley Airshow in nearby Columbus in April, and will prepare soon for their annual participation in October’s big airshow Wings Over North Georgia located at their home airfield.

“We do several air shows a year, and we invite the public to come up here,” Sunny states. “We will have a routine as we perform a few passes over the airfield.” The Tiger pilots traditionally perform the Missing Man Formation during airshows as well as execute several tight wing-to-wing formations during their show.

Weather permitting, Sunny and his team will be poised next to their aircraft on May 13 to talk one-on-one with the public about the foundation, and to answer questions about their formation flying.

The pilots volunteer their time and their airplanes to Tiger Flight in support of the foundation, and Sunny adds that none of the money raised goes toward the aircraft but toward the education they provide.

To learn more about joining Tiger Flight visit TigerFlightFoundation.org.

(Charles Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via social media  @Military_Flight.)

Six Things You Probably Never Knew About the Mighty A-6 Intruder

The Navy’s Uniquely Capable All-Weather Attack Jet Went Where Others Feared to Fly

int1

One of a Kind Indeed

On April 19th 1960, the prototype Grumman A-6 Intruder, Grumman model G-128 and designated the YA2F-1, BuAer 147864, lifted off from Grumman’s Calverton facility for the first time. Nearly 37 years and 693 Intruders later, on February 28th 1997, Medium Attack Squadron 34 (VA-34), the Blue Blasters, retired the Navy’s last operational A-6E Intruders. Those 37 years were remarkable in many ways. The Intruder was one of a kind, and we’ll probably never see another aircraft like it. Or one as capable.

int2

Conceived in STOL

The A-6 originally had swiveling exhaust nozzles (up to 23 degrees downward) intended to shorten takeoffs and landings. Flight testing revealed that performance was not significantly improved by variable thrust direction so the swiveling exhaust nozzles were removed. This was the reason for the location of the Pratt & Whitney J52-P6 engines on the airframe, and the reason why they could be dangerous to deck crews. The exhaust nozzles on the production A-6 were still angled a couple of degrees outward in order to avoid turbulence at the horizontal stabilizers.

a6build

The Competition

The initial US Navy Bureau of Aeronautics (BuAer) proposal received 11 different submissions from Bell, Boeing, Douglas, Lockheed, Martin, North American, and Vought. And of course Grumman. The Grumman A-6 design team was led by Lawrence Mead Junior. Mead was also instrumental in the design and development of two other notable Grumman products; The F-14 Tomcat and the Lunar Excursion Module (LEM) that took our Apollo astronauts to the surface of the moon.

int4

Decelerons and Brakes

The Navy awarded Grumman a contract to build eight A2F-1s in February 0f 1958. The first delivery of an A-6A Intruder to the US Navy was to the A-6 Fleet Replacement Squadron (FRS) VA-42 Green Pawns on February 7th 1962. The A-6A became operational with VA-75 Sunday Punchers for the first time in 1963. A-6As had both fuselage and wing air brakes. The fuselage airbrakes caused controllability problems. The fuselage air brakes were removed, but the “decelerons” (often referred to as “boards”) on the wing remained. The Intruder subsequently retained leading edge slats and decelerons on all models.

int5

A Unique Office Arrangement

The two-place, side by side cockpit of the Intruder put the pilot on the port side of the aircraft and the bombardier-navigator (BN) on the starboard side. However, the BN’s seat was slightly lower and located farther aft. The Intruder was the first fleet aircraft with an integrated diagnostic system for aircraft status, called Basic Automated Checkout Equipment (BACE). In order to train Intruder crews and after finding Douglas TA-3B Skywarriors unsuitable, the Navy and Grumman built nine TC-4C Adademes, Gulfstream I twin-turbine executive aircraft with the nose section (and the associated electronics) of an Intruder faired onto the nose. These trainers were flown by the A-6 FRS.

int6

Ugly But Well Hung

The design of the Intruder was driven by the size of the two radars needing to be installed in the nose as well as desire to improve crew coordination by seating them side by side in the cockpit. The Intruder‘s large blunt nose and slender tail inspired a number of nicknames, including “Drumstick”, “Double Ugly”, “The Mighty Alpha Six”, and “Iron Tadpole.” But on its five wet (capable of carrying fuel) hard points the Intruder could carry and deliver a war load unlike any other Navy jet. For that, Double Ugly was one beautiful airplane.

int7

DIANE Makes Them Wonder

After the 1962 BuAer aircraft re-designations the A2F-1 became A-6A. The heart of the A-6A was the Digital Integrated Attack Navigation Equipment (DIANE) system, which provided an electronic display of targets and geographical features even in low visibility conditions. The iconic early example of the Intruder’s ability to hit targets any time was when two A-6As attacked a North Vietnamese power plant during a particularly dark and stormy night. The Intruders dropped 26 Mark 82 500 pound bombs on the target, but the damage they caused convinced those on the ground that B-52s had carried out the attack instead.

int8

To War in Vietnam

Intruders first went to war in Southeast Asia during 1965 aboard USS Independence (CVA-62). The first Intruder loss in Vietnam took place on July 14th 1965 when Navy Lieutenants Donald Boecker and Donald Eaton of VA-75 Sunday Punchers with CVW-17 aboard USS Independence (CVA-62) were shot down. Both pilot and BN ejected and both survived. The Navy and Marines lost a total of 84 Intruders during the Vietnam War (to all causes) while flying more than 35,000 sorties. Marine Intruder squadrons remained shore-based throughout the Vietnam War, with one notable exception: VMA(AW)-224 Fighting Bengals replaced VA-35 Black Panthers as the all-weather attack squadron in CVW-15 when they deployed aboard USS Coral Sea (CVA-43) during her 1971-1972 WestPac. The last Intruder loss in Vietnam took place on January 24th 1973 when Navy Lieutenants C.M. Graf and S.H. Hatfield of VA-35 Black Panthers with CVW-1 aboard USS America (CVA-66) were shot down. Both pilot and BN ejected and survived.

int9

Ruling With an Iron Hand

The 19 A-6B variants built were originally intended to be a clear-air (not all-weather capable) versions of the A-6A but were instead adapted to perform the air defense/surface-to-air missile (SAM) defense role, or in Navy parlance, Iron Hand missions. The A-6Bs saw above-average losses, in part due to the inherent risk of the Iron Hand mission itself. Because the basic A-6A was also capable of employing the anti-radar missile of the day, the AGM-78 Standard ARM, the 14 surviving A-6Bs (5 were lost in combat) were eventually reworked to the A-6E specification during the mid-1970s.

int10

The TRIM Difference

The 12 A-6C variants built were fitted with the Trails Roads Interdiction Multi-sensor (TRIM) mounted in a mid-bottom fuselage location. This early version of a Forward-Looking Infrared (FLIR) and Low Light-Level Television (LLLTV) set was capable of detecting vehicles, trains, and other targets at night, turning the A-6C into a night hunter. The A-6C also carried the “Black Crow” engine ignition sensor for truck targeting. The first squadron to fly the A-6C in combat was VA-165 Boomers with CVW-9 aboard USS America (CVA-66). The A-6Cs were all eventually reworked to the A-6E specification, but the TRIM-equipped A-6Cs blazed a trail for the A-6E TRAM to follow.

int11

Dedicated TexacoTadpoles

78 A-6As and 12 A-6Es were reworked for use as KA-6D tanker aircraft. The fleet’s KA-3B and EKA-3B Skywarriors were getting long in the tooth and never were exactly dainty aircraft. The Intruder tanker conversions were completed during the early 1970s. Most of the mission-specific electronic equipment was removed from these dedicated “Texaco” tankers. The age old NavAir edict stating “you can never too much gas in the air” was eased somewhat by the presence of the KA-6Ds but there weren’t enough of them to go around. Each squadron was equipped with three or four of them and they were often swapped (cross-decked) from carrier to carrier as one returned from deployment and another departed. They were eventually replaced by another re-tasked aircraft- the Lockheed S-3 Viking. Now they use Super Hornets!

A 6E VMAAW 121 in flight over Florida 1982

Leatherneck Intruders

The Marine Corps operated Intruders with distinction for many years. Marine Corps All Weather Attack Squadrons VMA(AW)-121 Green Knights, VMA(AW)-224 Bengals, VMA(AW)-225 Vagabonds (later AKA Vikings), VMA(AW)-242 Batmen (later AKA Bats), VMA(AW)-332 Moonlighters (earlier AKA Polkadots), VMA(AW)-533 Hawks, and VMAT(AW)-202 Double Eagles (Fleet Replacement Squadron) all flew the A-6.

int12

Bang NEXT Page to Read the Rest of the Intruder Story

April 18th Was A Great Day In Aviation–Some Amazing Videos In Here

April 18th is a very significant date in aviation history. There is a lot to cover so stay with us…

apr1In 1917, William Edward Boeing renamed his Pacific Aero Products company, calling it The Boeing Airplane Company. Boeing’s company would go on to design and build some of the most important military and civilian aircraft the world has ever known. Think of a world without the Boeing Stearman trainer, B-17 Flying Fortress, the B-29 Superfortress, the B-52 Stratofortress, the CH-46 Sea Knight or the CH-47 Chinook, the C-135 / KC-135 series of military transports, electronic warfare aircraft, and tankers, the C-17 Globemaster III, and many more…or the 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777…you get the point.

[youtube id=”p9gAcqGLcQ4″ width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

apr2In 1918, Frederick Bock was born. US Army Air Forces (USAAF) Captain Frederick Bock would later command the B-29 Superfortress bomber “The Great Artiste” on August 9th 1945. Major Charles Sweeney commanded Bock’s usual aircraft, “Bock’s Car”, Air Force serial number 44-27297, which dropped the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki that day in 1945. “Bock’s Car” is now displayed at the National Museum of the US Air Force. Few are aware just how close the mission came to failure at several points along the way.

[youtube id=”qGzta8n9zIk” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

aor3Also in 1942, Colonel James Doolittle launched first from the storm-lashed deck of the aircraft carrier USS Hornet (CV-8) in company with 15 other B-25B Mitchell bombers to attack the Japanese home islands for the first time. Detected by Japanese picket boats while still more than 200 miles from their intended launch point, Doolittle and the captain of the Hornet (Marc Mitscher) decided to launch the raiders immediately after the task force was discovered. You know the rest of the story. Today is the 75th anniversary of the Doolittle Tokyo raid. The last living participant, Doolittle’s co-pilot Richard Cole, is being honored by the Air Force as you read this.

[youtube id=”J9sWwJSm96E” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

apr4A year to the day later, in 1943, United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) pilots flying P-38G Lightnings executed Operation Vengeance, the interception and destruction of the Mitsubishi G4M Betty bomber carrying Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto over Bougainville in the Solomons Islands. Yamamoto had planned the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor and many of the other initial Japanese offensives of the war. The P-38G pilots were from the 339th Fighter Squadron of the 347th Fighter Group. Controversy over the identity of the pilot who actually shot Yamamoto’s plane down persisted for many years after the mission was completed.

[youtube id=”fKvJgFldgGA” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

apr5In 1952, the Convair YB-60, a converted B-36F Peacemaker with swept wings, tail stabilizers, and eight Pratt & Whitney J57 turbojet engines mounted paired in four pods, flew for the first time. Intended to compete for a United States Air Force (USAF) contract against the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, the YB-60 was less expensive but also far less capable than the Boeing design. The YB-60 was the largest jet powered bomber ever built.

[youtube id=”fFWH8aaQkmk” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

apr6In 1957, three Boeing B-52B Stratofortresses from the USAF 93rd Bombardment Wing completed the first circumnavigation of the world in 45 hours and 19 minutes for Operation Power Flight. Having been in service with Strategic Air Command (SAC) for only a few months at the time of the record-setting flight, the B-52 was doing things that no other jet-powered bomber in the world could do, and ensuring that the entire world knew it. That was on component of deterrence.

apr7In 1958, a Grumman F11F-1 Tiger, piloted by US Navy Lieutenant Commander George Watkins, rose from Edwards Air Force Base in California to a new world altitude record of 76,933 feet. The Tiger was the first Grumman fighter that was capable of supersonic speeds in level flight. It was handicapped by the available engine technology when it was introduced and, in a word, timing. The Tiger was competing against the Vought F-8 Crusader and the McDonnell F-4 Phantom II.

apr8In 1973, the USAF announced that the Fairchild (Republic) YA-10 had won the A-X fly-off against the Northrop YA-9. The competition started with a USAF request for proposal (RFP) in May of 1970 for a low-cost, survivable airframe to be used primarily for ground attack. We all know how that one turned out. Like the B-52, there is no suitable replacement for the A-10 Thunderbolt II.

[youtube id=”qRsor-m9CB4″ width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

apr9In 1988, as part of what was called the “Tanker War”, the US Navy took retaliatory action against Iranian Naval forces and facilities in the Persian Gulf as part of Operation Praying Mantis. An Iranian mine had heavily damaged the Navy Guided Missile Frigate USS Samuel B Roberts (FFG-58). VA-95 Green Lizards A-6E Intruders from the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65) sank or damaged several Iranian Navy ships and small craft. Other naval aircraft attacked Iranian targets supporting mining operations in the Gulf.

apr10In 1991 Eastern Airlines was dissolved after 64 years in operation. Eastern was the first airline to fly the Boeing 727 and 757 passenger airliners, and the first US carrier to fly the Airbus A300. In 1938 World War I flying ace Eddie Rickenbacker bought Eastern from General Motors and quickly grew it into the most profitable airline in the country. I n 2011 Eastern was reborn as a charter airline.

[youtube id=”Q-1-rEtxl5E” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Only The Space Shuttle ‘flew’ Faster Than This Rocket Plane Designed With A Slide Rule

Today’s retrospective is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) film “Research Project X-15.” Shot during the mid-1960s at various NASA locations and Edward Air Force Base (AFB) in California, the film highlights the development of not only the X-15, but several of the other previous X planes as well. Interviews with designers, builders, and pilots highlight the narrative history of a program that peeled back the mysteries needing to be solved in order to explore space and visit the moon. Flown by well-known test pilots like Neil Armstrong, Scott Crossfield, Joe Walker, and Pete Knight on 199 total missions, the X-15 was a program far ahead of its time in many ways.

NASA X-15 carried by the NB-52B mothership 52-008 The Challenger and a T-38 Talon chase plane alongside.

Featured prominently in the film are the B-52 motherships The High and Mighty One (NB-52A Air Force serial number 52-003- Balls 3) and The Challenger (NB-52B Air Force serial number 52-008- Balls 8). 52-003 was retired in 1969 and can now be viewed at the Pima County Air Museum in Tucson, Arizona. 52-008 remained in service supporting NASA and private space initiatives until December 17th 2004, when the venerable aircraft was retired to gate guard duty at Edwards AFB and replaced by a slightly younger, but far less experienced, B-52H mothership.

X-15A2 (Air Force serial number 56-6671) with external fuel tanks fitted.

The three X-15s were flown to investigate high-speed, high-altitude flight characteristics between June of 1959 and October of 1968. X-15s set world speed records of Mach 6.7 and altitude records of 354,200 feet. Those speed and altitude records stood for almost 40 years. Information gained from the highly successful X-15 program contributed to development of the NASA Mercury, Gemini, Apollo, and Space Shuttle manned space flight programs, as well as development of materials and systems used in high-speed high-altitude aircraft designed and built after the program came to its conclusion. Other programs followed the X-15 but for sheer envelope-pushing the X-15 Research Project was unmatched before or since.

[youtube id=”WSEywbqi5ps” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Delta Air Lines Flight Museum Soars In Its Growing Popularity

0

ATLANTA, Ga. — Delta Air Lines state-of-the-art flight museum is flying high this week with the addition of a new jet aircraft as it expands the spotlight on the company’s rich history as an air transportation service and the people behind their wings.

The history of the iconic airline with it’s roots planted deep in the American south, through to the modern flight services of today are showcased with rare artifacts and actual aircraft poised inside and outside of the Delta Flight Museum in Atlanta.delta3

As Delta celebrates eighty-eight years of passenger service in June, its newly renovated museum is located inside two former Delta flight hangers. Today, they house a modern glimpse into the company’s history featuring several static displays of the airline’s historic planes and the only full motion Boeing 747 flight simulator in the United States.

“Today with operations to 65 countries on six continents, it’s hard to image those early days in Atlanta when Delta flew to just 16 cities,” said Fred Cannon, Executive Director of the Delta Flight Museum. “Hangers one and two were next to the airfield and housed Delta’s aircraft maintenance operations — at the time the largest in the southeast.”

As guests arrive at the museum’s parking lot a majestic Boeing 757, supporting it’s original Delta colors, greets visitors to the historic aviation grounds located on the shoulder of the world’s busiest airport, Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson.

Adjacent to the 757 is the newly opened 747 Experience featuring the first 747-400 aircraft. The retired Delta 747 stands poised awaiting visitors for a unique inside tour. Known within Delta as ship 6301, this 747 flew over 61 million miles during its 26 year history with Northwest Airlines, and later Delta, following the 2009 merger by the two companies.

Delta Air Lines early beginnings is a historic timeline of aviation firsts with fascinating antidotes mixed in for flavor. A popular farm dusting business was purchased by a group led by C.E. Woolman in 1928, and was renamed for the Mississippi Delta, the region where Delta Air Operations was originally based near Monroe, Louisiana.

Catherine Fitzgerald, Mr. Woolman’s assistant, first suggested the company’s name in 1928, and by the following year, Delta leaped skyward with it’s first commercial passenger flight out of Dallas. It was on June 29, 1929, when stunt flyer turned commercial airman Johnny Howe became the first Delta Airlines pilot departing Dallas at 8:00 a.m. en route to Shreveport and then Monroe.

The single prop Travel Air S-6000-B aircraft carried one passenger on that first flight into Shreveport, and picked up an additional passenger that same day. The next year, Delta began passenger service to Atlanta for only a few months, and then full time service resumed in 1934.

When was Delta’s first in-flight meal served? In 1936, as the co-pilot of the company’s new Lockheed 10 Electra got up to offer box lunches with coffee to the nearly fourteen passengers. The airline’s first “stewardesses” were later added to flight crews beginning in 1940, according to the museum. And, in 1941, the airline moved it’s headquarters from Monroe to the twin Atlanta hangers located on the edge of the then expanding airfield.delta4

Inside Hanger 2 rests the airline’s first Boeing 767 known as the “Spirit of Delta”. The 159-foot long aircraft was dedicated at company wide event in December 1982, and was later retired in 2006. The B767 could ferry 204 passengers and a crew of eight cross country with a range of 2,100 miles.

delta2A silvery Douglas Aircraft DC-3 looks incredible as she sits in Hanger 1 just as she did sixty years earlier. The 65-foot long twin prop could stay aloft for 1,400 miles as she carried up to 21 passengers and a crew of three at speeds of up to 170 m.p.h.
delta5
An actual Delta Airlines full motion Boeing 737 flight simulator located in one corner of Hanger 2 of the open air museum. “This is not a toy, it’s the real deal,” states museum director Tiffany Ming as she described the sim which was used by the company to train it’s pilots. The simulator’s one hour time limit is a bit pricey, however it is the perfect gift for aviation buffs interested in the experience.

The Delta Flight Museum is located at 1060 Delta Blvd, Atlanta, just east of Interstate 85, and north of the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport. The museum is open Monday, Tuesday, Thursday thru Saturday from 10:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and Sunday from 12 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Tickets very by age and can be purchased online or inside at the gift shop. Visit their site at www.deltamuseum.org for updated information and times.

(Charles Atkeison reports on aerospace and technology. Follow his updates via Twitter @Military_Flight.)

Flying Led Me to Tracy

I love to fly. Like many things in life there is a tenuous chain of events that lead me to flying…and to my wife, my love, my front-seater, and the mother of our children — Tracy.

In 1968 I was in high school. A junior. I had just started wearing glasses to see distances whereas my two older brothers had worn glasses most of their lives. (Interestingly, none of my younger siblings wore glasses at all — eyes get better with each kid?) My counselor (Mr. Victor Long, whom I visit to this day and ride bikes and play racquetball with occasionally — he can easily outride me and usually beats me in racquetball) asked me if I ever thought about going to the USAF Academy after graduation from high school. As I recall my reaction was something like “The Air Force what?” I applied, was accepted, and in June 1969 walked up the “Bring Me Men…” ramp along with 1400 other members of the Class of 73. I later learned that I was competing for one of about 300 NPQ (“not pilot qualified”) slots, so getting in was tighter than I realized.

afa

Late in my junior year at the Academy I was walking back to the dormitory with fellow cadet, John Eisenhart. (In the 80s I returned the favor and helped John get a job at IBM when Air Florida folded. IBM didn’t hold him; he got a job with Continental a few years later.) He asked me what I was going to do after graduation. Since I was not pilot qualified due to my glasses I was planning on taking an engineering job somewhere in the USAF. (I majored in electrical engineering — a decision I made based on some guidance from my mother back when I was in high school — a decision I have never regretted. EE was one of the “hardest” majors at the Academy. I thrived on it and all of the academics at the Academy…well, most. I didn’t do so well in economics or political science.) He told me about a program, approved by the Air Force, to evaluate a technique for improving vision — orthokeratology. Basically, you wear contact lenses — “hard” contacts — that are flatter than the curvature of your cornea. Overtime and with series of flatter and flatter lenses, your cornea is reshaped — flattened. Ever so slightly, but enough to alter the focal point of your eye back on to the retina thus improving your vision. (Or something like that.) Within a few months I was seeing 20/20. On about April 1, 1973 (senior year), we had to take our contacts out and leave them out. (As cadets we lived by the Honor Code: “I will not lie, steal, or cheat, or tolerate anyone among us who does.” Though there have been numerous “honor scandals” at the Air Force Academy, the huge majority of the 30,000+ graduates of the Academy all abided by this code to the letter. It guides me today in my daily life though I must admit I am not as fervent in following the code as I was at the Academy.) I did not put my contacts in after April 1 in an effort to keep my 20/20 vision and have never worn them since.

optemOn about May 1, 1973, I went to the eye doctor for the first of four exams. The exams always consisted of reading the eye chart, which was conducted by a technician, and then a peek inside my eye by the ophthalmologist. As days passed my vision got worse and worse. It was obvious the effect of orthokeratology was temporary. Due to the environment in which USAF pilots fly, contact lenses were not allowed — pull 6 Gs in your fighter, lose a contact lens, and then what? — nor are they allowed to use the orthokeratology contacts as “retainers”. (Glasses are OK, obviously. I always wore them when I flew with a spare pair in my g-suit pocket.) I got through the first three tests but my acuity was worse with each test. On the fourth — and last — exam, my acuity was greater than 20/50 — the limit for pilot qualification. Sadly, I went down the hall to visit the ophthalmologist for the last time. I don’t remember his name but I should have found out and sent a thank you Christmas card to him every year since then. He looked at my chart and did something he never normally did: Asked me to read the letter chart. I tried as hard as I could to make out the letters. Apparently, this second reading it was good enough for him. He changed my acuity numbers from whatever they were to 20/50 — I was bound for pilot training.

Three months later on the first day of pilot training, the 50 or so members of my class were gathered around a large rectangle of folding tables in the ballroom of the officers’ club at Williams Air Force Base for in-processing. That morning, one of the presenters asked us if we had had a physical within the last six months. I had been through the ringer prior to graduation just three months before so didn’t have to raise my hand. Those that hadn’t included a classmate of mine from the Academy. He, like me, was wearing glasses for distance vision that day. The exam included an eye test; he didn’t pass this time and he was shipped off to navigator training. I got to stick around and complete Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) in October 1974 and got my Air Force Wings. To this day, I wear my wings on my flight suit and my flight jacket. I am truly honored to have had the opportunity to attend the Academy and go to pilot training. They were defining moments in my life.

a 10jimI went on to fly in the USAF in six different airplanes. Most notable: LTV A-7D Corsair II — the “SLUF” — one of the first attack aircraft with good “magic” stuff, computed weapons delivery system and inertial nav, and the Fairchild-Republic A-10A Thunderbolt II — the “Warthog” — back before it had any of the “magic” and we dropped bombs shot the gun as I imagine the P-47 Thunderbolt pilots did back in WWII: hard sight and Kentucky windage. Well, I guess the gun we carried was a little better. After leaving the USAF I flew in the Colorado Air National Guard (the “Redeyes”) and as a civilian pilot. A particular airplane attracted my attention — one that would be fun to fly and would give me an opportunity to share flying as I had done in the USAF: the Beech T-34 Mentor. In the early 80s I had my first taste of flying the T-34 at Buckley Air National Guard Base near Denver, Colorado. When I moved back to San Diego, I looked for an opportunity to fly the T-34 and found it at the North Island Navy Flying Club: Beech T-34B N795FC. I joined the club in January 1994 shortly after 5FC arrived. Two years later I met Tracy at the club when she started taking lessons. The rest is history and, as Tracy often says, was meant to be.

 

El Dorado Canyon: President Reagan Sent the Whole Shooting Match After Gaddafi in 1986

The Operation Was a Show of Force But No Happy Ending

At 0200 local time on 14 April 1986, United States Air Force (USAF), United States Navy (USN), and United States Marine Corps (USMC) aircraft attacked targets in Tripoli and Benghazi, Libya. The attack was code named Operation El Dorado Canyon. The raid was President Ronald Reagan’s response to several Libyan-sponsored terrorist attacks in Europe, among them the 1985 Rome and Venice airport attacks that killed 19 and wounded approximately 150 people. On the night of 5 April 1986 Libyan agents bombed the “La Belle” nightclub in West Berlin, killing a Turkish woman and two American Army Sergeants, Kenneth T. Ford and James E. Goins. Also injured were 50 US military personnel among the total of 230 hurt. The gloves were about to come off.

el1
USAF F-111E in flight

Navy 2 Libya 0

Libya had been a thorn in the world’s side ever since Muammar Gaddafi had risen to power. Gaddafi was unapologetic about his support for terrorism, even saying publicly that he would continue to support terrorism. Previous confrontations had not gone well for Gaddafi. During a United States freedom of navigation exercise during August of 1981, two Libyan SU-22 Fitter pilots mixed it up with VF-41 Black Aces F-14A Tomcats. The T-shirts that magically appeared seemingly within minutes on every Navy base and air station around the world proclaimed: Navy 2. Libya 0. This engagement went down in history as the Gulf of Sidra Incident.

45151846 10217990888068442 5880192098061254656 o
Image via US Navy

Going It Alone While “Allies” Sit It Out

President Reagan, having worked for several days after the LaBelle bombing with European and Arab countries to try and arrive at some kind of diplomatic resolution to the Gaddafi problem, decided on 14 April to attack terrorism-related targets in Libya. Unfortunately he got little or no support from any of the European countries. France, Italy and Spain not only denied overflight permission for the strikes; they also denied the use of any bases by the Americans. This would mean that the USAF bombers would have to fly from their bases in the United Kingdom around the entire European land mass in order to reach their Libyan targets- turning a long but manageable duration mission into a 15 hour, 5,500 mile marathon. It would be the longest mission flown by tactical aircraft to date. Go find your most uncomfortable chair and sit in it without getting up and moving around. For 15 hours. In the for-what-it’s-worth department, the French president was said to have denied the Americans his support because he wasn’t interested in a limited response, but wanted a stronger response that would remove Gaddafi from power. Does that make your six feel any better after hour ten in that chair?

el3
USAF F-111E refuels from a Wisconsin Air National Guard KC-135 tanker.

Training for the Real-World Mission

One little-known aspect of the operation is that during October of 1985 ten of the F-111E Aardvarks of the 20th Tactical Fighter Wing (TFW) flew a practice long-duration bombing mission from their base at RAF Upper Heyford in the UK to Newfoundland, Canada and back again. Referred to as Operation Ghost Rider (cool name!), this training mission was conceived to work out any potential kinks in the plan so a similar mission could be flown the following year. Perhaps even against Libya. Information and tactics used by the 20th TFW were passed down the line to the 48th TFW, equipped with F-111F model ‘Varks.

el2
USAF F-111F drops retarded bombs on a target range.

Air Force Order of Battle

The order of battle for Operation Eldorado Canyon, which would be the first Air Force combat mission since the war in Vietnam, started with the 24 (including six spare) F-111F Aardvarks of the 48th TFW, based at RAF Lakenheath in the UK. These Pave Tack infrared targeting designator-equipped bombers would drop precision-guided Paveway bombs on their Libyan military targets. Providing electronic countermeasures support would be five (1 spare) EF-111A Ravens of the 42nd Electronic Combat Squadron (ECS) out of RAF Upper Heyford. 19 McDonnell Douglas KC-10A Extender and ten Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker aerial refueling tankers from RAF Mildenhall and RAF Fairford would provide the total of six aerial refuelings the USAF bombers and jammers would require to fly their assigned missions. The additional tanker assets needed to support the mission were moved in to the bases in the UK under the cover of a NATO exercise dubbed Salty Nation.

el4
US Navy EA-6B Prowler of VAQ-135 Black Ravens in flight

For the Rest of the El Dorado Canyon Story Bang NEXT PAGE Below

BAT 21 Bravo: When Combat SAR Was Put to the Ultimate Test

Gene Hambleton Landed in the Middle of the Largest NVA Offensive of the War…and Lived to Tell About It.

On April 2, 1972 over South Vietnam, two United States Air Force (USAF) Douglas EB-66 Destroyers were escorting a cell of three Boeing B-52D Stratofortresses tasked to bomb Ho Chi Minh Trail access points in Quang Tri Province. The EB-66s were there to provide search and guidance radar jamming for the B-52D big ugly fat…fellows (BUFFs) and to gather electronic signals intelligence. The call sign of the first EB-66C as Bat 21. The 1972 Easter Offensive was in its third day. Roughly 30,000 North Vietnamese Army (NVA) troops had crossed the De-Militarized Zone (DMZ) and were headed south. What happened next would be debated for its human cost, and celebrated for its ingenuity and bravery by all involved.

eb662
Typical North Vietnamese SA-2 Guideline SAM site

Drawdown Puts a Senior Nav Aboard

B-52D BUFFs had been flying “Arc Light” bombing missions in support of the defenders on the ground but had been increasingly tracked and fired upon by surface-to-air missiles (SAMs). The BUFFs needed more electronic support and the 42nd Tactical Electronic Warfare Squadron (42nd TEWS) was tasked to provide that support. Like many other organizations, manpower had been depleted by the personnel draw down in the 42nd TEWS. As a result, a senior navigator by the name of Iceal Hambleton, better known as Gene, assigned himself to fly as the navigator in one of the EB-66s slated for the mission of April 2nd. Ironically, Hambleton had tracked NVA SA-2 Guideline SAMs south of the DMZ before, but others continued to question their presence so in South Vietnam.

eb663
Douglas EB-66 Destroyer on the tarmac in Thailand

Out of the Frying Pan…

Douglas EB-66C Destroyer, Air Force serial number 54-0466, was flying over Quang Tri Province, just south of the DMZ, when the NVA shot a volley of SAMs at the two EB-66s. Hambleton’s EB-66C was hit by a SA-2 while flying at 29,000 feet over northern South Vietnam. Hambleton called for the crew to eject and pulled his seat ejection handles just before the stricken EB-66 was hit by a second SA-2 and destroyed. Hambleton was the sole survivor of a crew totaling six. As he floated down in his parachute he realized he had shrapnel wounds from his aircraft exploding, a ripped finger, and four compressed vertebra from the force of the ejection. Remember those 30,000 NVA troops pouring over the border? Hambleton floated down in his parachute right into the middle of their advance, yet a fortuitous low cloud bank hid him as he descended in a dry rice paddy.

49094814 228557671390034 2440538045519233024 o
image via national museum of the us air force

Right in the Middle of the NVA Advance

Hambleton (call sign Bat 21 Bravo) was in radio contact with Air Force Forward Air Controllers (FACs) flying a Cessna O-2 in the vicinity even before he landed. Even though the FACs saw the EB-66 get shot down, they were still unprepared for the number of NVA troops and the sheer amount of NVA arms and equipment in the area. The FACs fixed Hambleton’s position and relayed it to an HC-130P combat search and rescue (CSAR) tanker aircraft (call sign King 22) in order to get a rescue force spun up. Friendly forces had just destroyed a bridge in the area, so now Hambleton had a front row seat (less than 100 meters away) for the re-routed NVA advance to the south.

eb665
Lieutenant Colonel Iceal “Gene” Hambleton, USAF

Hambleton Was Much More Than Just a Senior Navigator

Lieutenant Colonel Iceal Hambleton was not just another Air Force World War II veteran and senior navigator. Hambleton had worked on Strategic Air Command’s (SAC’s) Jupiter, Titan I, and Titan II intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) programs. He had even been Deputy Chief of Operations at SAC’s 390th Strategic Missile Wing. He had firsthand knowledge of the innermost workings of America’s atomic weapons delivery systems and likely targeting information as well. Gene Hambleton simply could not be captured. It is highly likely that the North Vietnamese (and by extension the Soviets) knew of Hambleton’s assignment to the 42nd TEWS, based in Thailand, and if they found out he had been shot down they would make every effort to grab Hambleton. On the other hand, the United States Air Force, Navy, Marines, and even the South Vietnamese, were about to make every effort to rescue Gene Hambleton.

eb66 6
Cessna O-2 FAC aircraft in flight over Vietnam

For More of the Ballad of Bat 21 Bravo Bang NEXT PAGE Below.

French Air Force’s Patrouille de France Exciting U.S. Airshow Crowds

The precision aerobatics of the French Air Force’s own demonstration team Patrouille de France is exciting airshow crowds across America this spring as their ten jets perform an exciting display of maneuvers

Patrouille de France is only in North America through May as the squadron makes their first visit here in 30 years. The team is marking the 100th anniversary of the U.S. entry into World War I to aid France and England, and will include ceremonial events on the ground at each airshow stop.  as they remember the centennial.

pat6

In the sky, the blue, white, and red contrails of Patrouille de France’s eight Alpha jets flying in tight formation is becoming a major highlight at recent airshows in Florida and Alabama. To many, the French Air Force aerobatics won their hearts as the team’s narrator expressed wishes of love and greetings from France to America.

AvGeekery.com caught up with the team at Maxwell AFB in Montgomery as they co-headlined the base’s Open House and Airshow on April 8 and 9 with the USAF Thunderbirds. The two teams engaged in discussions and the Birds even welcomed two of France’s elite to fly with their team.

pat5

“At Maxwell, Captain Dubois and Captain Tardif, had the chance to fly with the Thunderbirds in the back seat of their F-16s,” said Patrouille de France spokesperson LTT Antonia Buroni on Sunday. “These fine flights have strengthened the ties that bind us to the American Air Force patrol. It was also an exchange about our ways of working, which proved very enriching. We are delighted to have been able to embark with them.”

pat4

The team’s cargo and personnel craft, an Airbus A400M Atlas, performs a flight demo an hour prior to the Alpha jets. The hulking gray aircraft will demonstrate a high pitch take-off, flat passes, and incredible wing tipped passes before the crowd.

pat3

Each pilot flies under the call sign of Athos 1 thru 8, and has currently been with the team for over a year. Lead by flight leader and Athos 1, Commander Christophe, each pilot carries over 2000 hours of flight time behind the stick of the French jets.

Known as the world’s oldest demonstration team in world beginning in 1931, many of Patrouille de France maneuvers are cutting edge providing a deeper dimension during their show flying with two jets more than their U.S. counterpart, the Thunderbirds or the Navy’s Blue Angels. A few of their eight jet formations include the Diamond, Apollo, Fleche, and Canard.

“For two days, we presented our series to the public, who came to attend this meeting at this air base located in the town of Montgomery,” LTT Buroni added. “The audience of the meeting was able to attend in-flight demonstrations of several types of aircraft, including pallet dropping by the eight C-130 Hercules stationed on the Maxwell base, as well as the Eurofighter Typhoon Royal Air Force British.”

pat2

Two hours following their April 9 flight demo at Maxwell, Patrouille de France jets and cargo craft departed for Pensacola for two days with the Blue Angels. The squadron will perform a fly over of the Grand Canyon on April 13, followed by stops in Sacramento, California this weekend, and a brief visit with the Thunderbirds at their home in Las Vegas on April 17 and 18. Their brief tour of North America will conclude on May 2 in Quebec.

(Charles A. Atkeison reports on aerospace and science. Follow his updates on social media via @Military_Flight.)

So Much Tomcat! The Very Last Fighter Fling, Starring The F-14 Tomcat And Its Crews

Parting With the Tomcat Still Stings

An era came to a close on July 28th 2006 aboard the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) when pilot Lieutenant Blake Coleman and radar intercept officer (RIO) Lieutenant Commander Dave Lauderbaugh were launched off catapult three at 1642. They were flying F-14D Tomcat BuNo 163417. The VF-31 Tomcatters aircraft Coleman and Lauderbaugh were flying that afternoon over the Atlantic Ocean was the last, the final, F-14 Tomcat ever catapulted off an aircraft carrier.

f141
F-14D Tomcat BuNo 163417, VF-31 side number 112, is launched from catapult 3 aboard USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71).

The Final Fighter Fling

We plan to do a more in-depth article about the F-14 Tomcat the next time a significant Tomcat anniversary rolls around. Our video selection is related to the end of the Tomcat era. It’s a bittersweet look at the state of Naval Aviation at the time when F-14 Tomcat squadrons were in the process of transitioning to Super Hornets. There are some veiled digs at Hornets and Hornet types and some that aren’t veiled even a little bit. Plenty of great flying footage and some great music made the final edit too. You’re definitely good for several LOL moments (even if you weren’t a fighter guy) and maybe even a sigh or a sniffle. It was a tough time for the VF community, but the producers, in this writer’s opinion anyway, nailed it. We hope you enjoy this, the not quite completely 100% PC (call it PC-ish) last Fighter Fling video ever produced: Fighter Fling 2004.

[youtube id=”QCmEFrWDAUY” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Aged But Still-Capable Warrior

Tomcats joined the fleet in 1973. Born from experience and lessons learned in the skies over Vietnam and tasked with defending the largest of American naval assets (and the biggest targets), Tomcats were capable of so much more than the previous Navy fleet defenders like the F-8 Crusader and the F-4 Phantom II. Both were great jets, but the Tomcat and its Phoenix missile system were built for cold war fleet defense by shooting down large numbers of attackers beyond the horizon. A high compliment can be paid to the Tomcat; it never had to do the job for which it and its missiles system were primarily designed. One of the most complicated and sophisticated aircraft ever deployed aboard aircraft carriers, the Tomcat was flown by the very best of the naval aviators coming out of Naval Air Training Command, which was fitting because the Tomcat demanded the very best of her crews.

f143
Felix 112 rides the shuttle down the deck for the last time.

The Bombcat Bows Out

Later in its service life the Tomcat took up bombing as a way to pay some of the bills. Equipped with the Low Altitude Navigation and Targeting Infrared for Night (LANTIRN) pod, the “Bombcat” became a very accurate bomber without letting itself go as a fighter. When the Tomcat was retired many Tomcat pilots were able to transition to its replacement, the McDonnell Douglas (Boeing) F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornets. Although the F/A-18F primarily took over the fleet defense role, both F/A-18 Super Hornet variants are considered dual-role, fighter and attack, aircraft.

f144
VF-31 performing a “bat” turn for the crew of the carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71).

Author’s note: There is conflicting information about Felix 112’s identity for this event. Some sources indicate that the jet Coleman and Lauderbaugh were flying that day was BuNo 164341. I went with the official Navy history of the event, as I nearly always do, which indicates the jet was BuNo 163417. Even Grumman documentation indicates 163417 was retired to AMARG in March 2006- months before the event. Now 164341 did land without the canopy or the VIP passenger in the back seat one memorable day, but that’s another story.

There Are No Old and Bold Pilots But There Are Plenty of Old Bold Gazelle Helicopters.

This Star of Multiple Movies Is Also a Stellar Trainer and War Machine

On April 7th 1967 the Aerospatiale (Airbus Helicopters) Gazelle helicopter flew for the first time. The Gazelle was one of the most advanced helicopter designs in the world when it was introduced and several newer designs have utilized its then-unique Fenestron tail fan system. The Gazelle combines relatively small overall size (less than 40 feet long) with the ability to carry five passengers. Originally conceived as a replacement for the successful Sud Aviation SE 3XX Alouette (Lark) series of helicopters, the SA 34X Gazelle series has been adapted to perform dozens of missions and roles for both military and civil operators. And that sound. No other chopper sounds quite like a Gazelle!

gaz1
Royal Navy training variant of the Gazelle.

Teaming Up to Build a Winner

While the Gazelle is clearly a relative of the Alouette, the similarities are superficial only. In 1963 Sud Aviation became aware of both British and French military requirements for a new utility helicopter design. The two largest helicopter builders in their respective countries, Westland of Britain and Sud Aviation of France, entered into an agreement to design and build the new Gazelle. The design of the cabin was predicated on the ability carry a litter patient, so although it is roomy it is also aerodynamically efficient and adaptable. Simple where it needed to be, with skid landing gear and an industry standard turbine engine turning a three bladed main rotor, yet innovative with features like the Fenestron tail fan and long-life components with low maintenance requirements, the Gazelle was built with longevity and usability in mind.

gaz2
French Army Gazelle used for training in flight.

Getting It Right and Keeping It Right

It took several years of development work to get the Gazelle into production. The prototype itself was not equipped with either the Fenestron tail fan or the intended rigid main rotor system. Once the two companies got things worked out in 1969, production of the Gazelle began. The first production Gazelle took flight on August 6th 1971. Since then, like so many other aircraft, the Gazelle has been refined and improved with more powerful engines and more robust transmissions. Avionics have been upgraded. Smaller but important upgrades to cockpit panel lighting, seating, and a host of other improvements have kept Gazelles flying in military and civil hands around the world.

gaz4
Closeup of the Fenestron tail fan used on the Gazelle.

Everywhere With the Brits

For the British, the Gazelle is one of only two aircraft (the other being DeHavilland’s Chipmunk) flown by the Royal Air Force (RAF), The Royal Navy (RN), The Royal Army (RA), and the Royal Marines (RM). Used primarily for training by both the RAF and RN, the Marines and the Army have used the Gazelle in combat during Operation Corporate (1982 Falklands), Operation Granby (1990-1992 Gulf War I), Operation Grapple (1993-2003 Balkans), Operation Joint Endeavour (1996 Bosnia), Operation Guardian (1999 Kosovo), Operation Barras (2000 Sierra Leone), Operation Fingal (2002 Afghanistan), Operation Telic (2003-2008 Iraq) and Operation Herrick (2006-2014 Afghanistan). One of the Gazelle’s strengths is adaptability, and British Gazelles have been fitted with laser target designators, thermal imaging systems, Doppler radar, Nightsun illumination equipment, machine guns, and guided missiles. The Brits have also found that the Gazelle is tough and reliable, reporting the highest combat availability of any British helicopter type in Iraq and Afghanistan.

gaz5
A French Army Gazelle with an outrider on the starboard skid.

French Twist

The French have been utilizing Gazelles since 1973. The majority of the French machines are powered by uprated versions of the Turbomeca Astazou engine to support additional weapons and guidance systems. French combat experience in Chad (1980s), the former Yugoslavia (1990s), Djibouti (1991–1992), Somalia (1993), Cote d’Ivoire (2002–present), Afghanistan (2002–present), and Mali (2013) were supported by Gazelles. French Gazelles have fired missiles at Somali pirates and Iraqi tanks. Equipped in many cases with guided Mistral air-to-air missiles or Euromissile HOT anti-tank missiles with sighting systems and designators mounted on top of the cabin, the French have sold hundreds of these pocket-sized tank killers to countries lacking budgets for the high-tech, high-cost attack helicopters being developed today. Gazelles have also been built under license by SOKO in Yugoslavia and the Arab British helicopter Company in Egypt. Production totals have exceeded 1,100 airframes.

gaz6
British Royal Marines Gazelle pictured somewhere hot and sandy.

Adaptability is Built-In

Gazelles have been adapted and upgraded with ferry tanks, infrared (IR) signature suppression systems, externally mounted cannon and machine guns with ammunition supplies in the cabin, rescue winches, particle filters for sandy environments, cabin heaters, emergency floatation equipment, high landing skids, engine anti-icing systems, and adjustable landing lights. Civilian examples of the Gazelle are also equipped with a baggage compartment. Gazelles utilized by law enforcement agencies can be equipped with stabilized camera mounts and lights along with other specialized surveillance imaging equipment. Military Gazelles have been upgraded with the latest armament options, 3D navigational displays, electronic flight instrumentation system (EFIS) cockpit displays, night-vision goggle compatibility, ballistic armor packages, direct voice input (DVI) systems for voice control of aircraft systems, and advanced autopilot systems.

gaz7
A French civil Gazelle at rest.

Ease of Maintenance 

Ease of maintenance and pilot-friendly operations are hallmarks of the Gazelle. Bearings in the Gazelle are life-rated without need for continuous application of lubrication. Most fluid tanks don’t require constant inspection. When the helicopter was designed emphasis was placed on minimal maintenance requirements. Minimal maintenance usually means low operating costs. Many components in the Gazelle were designed for a 700 hour service life, and some critical components have service lives of up to 1200 hours before replacement is required. The Gazelle was also the first helicopter to be rated for single pilot instrument flight conditions (IFR) flight. Surprisingly the Gazelle is not equipped with a throttle or a trimming system. A sophisticated autopilot system aids the pilot and keeps workloads manageable.

gaz8
British Army Gazelle equipped with advanced electronics mounted on the top of the cabin.

Team Player

Current and former military operators of the Gazelle helicopter series include Angola, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burundi, Cameroon, Chad, People’s Republic of China, Cyprus, Ecuador, Egypt, France, Gabon, Guinea, Iraq, Ireland, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Montenegro, Morocco, Qatar, Rwanda, Senegal, Serbia, Republika Srpska, Syria, the United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, and Yugoslavia. Civil operators of the Gazelle are found all around the world.

gaz9
A Hungarian-registered civil Gazelle on the pad.

Movie Star Chopper

Gazelles have starred in many movies and television shows over the years. Perhaps the Gazelle with the most screen cred isn’t really a Gazelle at all. Used as the basis for the highly modified and just as heavily armed “anti-riot” helicopter star of the 1978 Columbia/Rastar movie Blue Thunder, and the exceedingly short-lived television series of the same name, was a Gazelle, but Avgeeks knew that as soon as they heard it. At least when it wasn’t in “whisper mode” that is. Clint Eastwood’s character Ben Shockley was chased and liberally shot at from a pesky but maneuverable Gazelle in the 1977 Warner Bothers film The Gauntlet. How many more movies or television shows do you know of in which Gazelles were used?

[youtube id=”cuYOFkj7KhM” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The C-130J: The High-Tech Millennial Grandchild Of The 60-Plus Year Old Hercules

Meet the Latest and Most Advanced Generation of the Ageless Herc

On 5 April 1996 the prototype Lockheed Martin C-130J Super Hercules flew for the first time. While the J model Herc looks a lot like its predecessors, there are more differences than meet the eye. One external cue is the presence of the six scimitar-bladed Dowty composite propellers, but the engines driving them are not the Allison T-56 turboshafts that have powered previous Hercules variants for the past 63 years. No, the C-130J is powered by more powerful and efficient Rolls-Royce (Allison) AE 2100 D3 turboshaft engines housed in revised nacelles. Those revised nacelles are another spotter’s tell. The rest of the differences between the J and previous models are primarily systems upgrades.

j2
RAF Hercules C5 on approach.

From the Sales Brochure

The C-130J comes equipped with a Honeywell dual-embedded global positioning system / inertial navigation system (GPS/INS) along with an enhanced traffic alerting and collision avoidance system (E-TCAS), the SKE2000 station keeping system, the Northrop Grumman low-power color radar display with digital moving map, Elbit Systems global digital map unit, a ground collision avoidance system, the TacView portable mission display and InegrFlight commercial GPS landing system sensor unit, and an instrument landing system (ILS). In the cockpit the J model has dual Flight Dynamics head-up displays, four L-3 multifunction liquid crystal displays (LCDs) for flight control and navigation systems and additional LCDs for selectable systems displays. BAE Systems dual mission computers operate and monitor the aircraft systems and advise the crew of status. With all those black boxes the Super Herc should be able to fly itself!

j3
US Marine Corps KC-130J tankers in flight

Getting Defensive

Defensive systems on board C-130Js include the ATK AN/AAR-47 missile warning system, the BAE Systems AN/ALR-56M radar warning receiver, the BAE Systems Integrated Defense Solutions AN/ALE-47 countermeasures system that can select and deploy chaff, flares, and POET and GEN-X active expendable decoys. Also included in the C-130J defensive systems suite is the Lockheed Martin AN/ALQ-157 Large Aircraft Infrared Countermeasures (LAIRCM). Special missions C-130Js also sport next-generation radio frequency countermeasures (RFCM) systems designed to protect the Herc from anti-aircraft weapons, radars and other threats that use electromagnetic signals. The C-130J is not an easy aircraft to bring down.

j4
US Coast Guard HC-130J in flight

The Record-Setting Hercules

The Lockheed (Lockheed Martin) C-130 Hercules series of tactical airlifter aircraft has been in continuous production longer than any military aircraft in history and has been in continuous service for 63 years and counting. The first customer for the C-130J model was the Royal Air Force (RAF) in the United Kingdom, which ordered 25 aircraft, taking delivery beginning in 1999. The RAF designations for their C-130Js are Hercules C5 (C-130J) and Hercules C4 (C-130J-30). The C-130J-30 adds an additional 15 total feet of cargo hold length to the basic C-130J aircraft. What may have sold the RAF on the C-130J is its improved performance. The J model Herc has 40% more range, a 21% higher maximum speed, and a 41% shorter takeoff distance than the previous C-130E and C-130H models.

j5
US Air Force C-130J in flight

Operations Requiring Special Talents

Normally a crew of three can handle the C-130J- two pilots and one loadmaster. No navigator or flight engineer is required for standard C-130J cargo or transport missions. However, special missions J Hercs such as the AC-130J Ghostrider gunship, the EC-130J Commando Solo III broadcast communications bird, the MC-130J Commando II combat support tanker, the HC-130J Combat King II rescue support tanker, and the WC-130J Hurricane Hunter weather reconnaissance aircraft add additional systems and crew as necessary to perform their missions. These spec-ops birds are few in number but capable of many specialized high risk we-were-never-there missions.

j6

US Marine Corps KC-130J with ISR / Weapon Mission Kit installed. Note Hellfire missiles under port wing

Presto- Your Tanker is Now a Gunship

A unique capability of the Marine KC-130J tanker is the ability to add the ISR / Weapon Mission Kit. This kit enables the KC-130J to be able to serve as a gunship with the ability to fire Hellfire or Griffin missiles, deliver precision-guided bombs, and fire 30 millimeter cannon rounds at a variety of targets. Designated Harvest HAWK (Hercules Airborne Weapons Kit), the system can be added to or removed from the standard USMC KC-130J tanker in a single day. Though not equipped with quite the same sensors and systems as the Air Force Ghostriders, Marine Harvest HAWK KC-130Js pack quite a punch.

j7
US Air Force C-130J in flight

Bringing the Rain

C-130Js are used is to deploy The Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System (MAFFS). MAFFS is a self-contained system that is loaded into the cargo hold of the C-130J (and other Herc variants) which adapts the Hercules to perform aerial tanker missions against wildfires. In turn the Hercules / MAFFS combination allows the United States Forest Service (USFS) to utilize Air Force Reserve (AFRES) and Air National Guard (ANG) Hercs as supplemental firefighting aircraft during peak fire conditions. The improved MAFFS II deployed for the first time aboard a C-130J during a July 2010 wildfire. The 146th Airlift Wing of the California Air National Guard was the first ANG or AFRES to transition to the MAFFS II system in 2008.

j1
US Air Force C-130J in flight

The International J

In addition to the United States Air Force, United States Marine Corps (the new Blue Angels support airlifter “Fat Albert” is a C-130J), and the United States Coast Guard, current and planned operators of the C-130J Super Hercules include Australia, Canada, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, India, Iraq, Israel, Italy, Kuwait, Libya, Mexico, Mongolia, Norway, Oman, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Tunisia, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. The more than 300 C-130Js built by Lockheed Martin have collectively amassed more than one million flight hours. C-130Js have also seen combat in Iraq and Afghanistan. Operations Odyssey Dawn and Unified Protector against Libya were supported by C-130Js as well.

j9
US Coast Guard HC-130H (foreground) and HC-130J (background) in flight

The Rime of the Ancient Airlifter

Today the future for the Hercules looks bright. Make no mistake about the C-130J- it can do things few other airlifters can do. But the list of aircraft that have served as long as the Hercules has is mighty short. Someone always seems to be saying the Herc needs to be replaced. More than sixty years they say. Long in the tooth they say. Well the trouble with that is that even though a few have tried, no suitable replacement for this venerable airlifter has been rolled out yet. Let me know when that happens…if I’m still around myself that is!

[youtube id=”yxGko0zT1bg” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]