Spirit Airlines will exit 11 US cities effective 2 October 2025, as part of its ongoing Chapter 11 restructuring.
The decision comes right on the heels of its second bankruptcy filing of 2025, initiated just last week. It also sheds light on the severity of the carrier’s financial challenges.
The cities losing Spirit service are:
Albuquerque, NM | Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ)
Birmingham, AL | Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport (BHM)
Columbia, SC | Columbia Metropolitan Airport (CAE)
Oakland, CA | Oakland International Airport (OAK)
Sacramento, CA | Sacramento International Airport (SMF)
San Jose, CA | Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC)
San Diego, CA | San Diego International Airport (SAN)
Portland, OR |Portland International Airport (PDX)
Salt Lake City, UT | Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC)
Contour Airlines and Spirit Airlines announce a strategic partnership to bring ULCC service to EAS communities across the US | IMAGE: Contour Airlines via Facebook/Spirit Airlines via Facebook
In addition, Spirit Airlines has canceled plans to launch service to Middle Georgia Regional Airport (MCN) in Macon, Georgia, which was scheduled to begin on 16 October in partnership with Contour Airlines.
It was only this past June when Spirit entered the Chattanooga and Columbia markets to much fanfare.
These markets make up just 3.9% of Spirit’s October seat capacity, but losing eight western US cities is a bold move for a carrier already on shaky ground (sounds like Avelo’s western retreat 2.0?)
Why Spirit Airlines Is Pulling Back
Image: By Acroterion from Wikimedia Commons
This marks Spirit’s second Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in less than a year. Although the carrier had previously emerged from an earlier restructuring with reduced debt, it continues to face significant headwinds. These include more than $2 billion in liabilities, intensifying domestic competition, higher labor and fuel costs, and a leisure demand environment that has not fully recovered since the pandemic.
Chief Executive Officer Dave Davis framed the Chapter 11 filing as a strategic necessity.
“It has become clear that there is much more work to be done, and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future,” said Davis following the most recent bankruptcy announcement. “A court-supervised process is the best path forward to make the changes needed to ensure our long-term success.”
The filing also outlined plans for Spirit to focus on core markets.
Those core markets include large bases such as Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, Detroit, Las Vegas, and Atlantic City, as well as Spirit’s Latin America and Caribbean routes.
Spirit’s troubles go deeper than routes, though. The failed JetBlue merger in early 2024 left them with $3.1 billion in debt. In its latest quarter, operating costs ran at 118% of revenue.
They’re trying to spice things up with a “premium” low-cost model, offering “Go Comfy” seats and bundled fares, but it’s a tough sell when your stock’s down 94% since January 2025, and you’re facing NYSE delisting. Plus, they’re furloughing 270 pilots come 1 November and downgrading 140 captains to first officers.
That’s a lean operation, even for a ULCC.
Then there’s the operational mess: Pratt & Whitney engine issues have sidelined chunks of Spirit’s A320neo fleet. To top it off, AerCap, their aircraft lessor, yanked leases for 36 planes due in 2027-2028 and flagged defaults on 37 current jets—about 25% of Spirit’s 214-aircraft fleet.
According to planespotters.net, Spirit currently operates a fleet of 152 Airbus aircraft.
Competitive Fallout
A Spirit Airlines Airbus A321neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Competitors are pouncing.
United is launching 15 new routes in January, targeting Spirit’s bread-and-butter like FLL, MCO, and LAS. Their SVP of network planning, Patrick Quayle, didn’t hold back, saying they’re simply prepping for if Spirit potentially “goes out of business.” Oof.
Duncan Dee, Spirit’s SVP of corporate communications, shot back at United, saying, “While we appreciate the obsession certain airline executives have with us, we’re focused on competing and running a great operation.”
While we appreciate the obsession certain airline executives have with us, we’re focused on competing and running a great operation.”
Duncan Dee | Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications, Spirit Airlines
He called United’s jab “wishful thinking” and doubled down on their low-fare mission, saying United’s goal was to “charge American travelers the highest fares possible to visit the people and places they love.”
It’s like an aviation soap opera, and we’re here for it.
United will launch 15 new routes in January, including new service from Newark to Chattanooga and Columbia, expanded Houston service to six US cities, and additional flights from Chicago (ORD), Newark (EWR), and Los Angeles (LAX) into Spirit strongholds such as Orlando (MCO), Fort Lauderdale (FLL), and Las Vegas (LAS).
Frontier isn’t sitting idle, either. It’s rolling out 42 new routes (20 were announced on 26 August, and 22 additional were announced on 4 September), many of which overlap with Spirit’s turf.
What It Means for Travelers
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
The immediate impact for passengers is reduced access to low-fare options in the affected cities. Spirit Airlines has long been a price leader, especially in leisure markets, exerting downward pressure on fares across the board. With Spirit’s departure, there is potential for higher ticket prices, particularly in smaller and mid-sized markets like Chattanooga, Columbia, and Boise, where ULCC competition is already limited.
Under US Department of Transportation rules, travelers booked on Spirit flights after 2 October will be eligible for refunds. The airline has committed to notifying customers directly and assisting with rebooking or reimbursement.
A ULCC Model Under Pressure
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit’s retrenchment highlights the challenges ULCCs face in today’s US market. The traditional model, which was built on high aircraft utilization, dense seating, and a la carte pricing, has come under strain from rising operating costs and shifting passenger expectations. Travelers increasingly demand reliability, schedule flexibility, and more comfort, putting pressure on carriers that rely on the bare-bones approach.
Moreover, consolidation across the industry has made it harder for small- to mid-sized ULCCs to compete against larger network carriers with greater financial resilience. Spirit’s failed merger attempts with Frontier and JetBlue are a giant stain on the strategic uncertainty plaguing the Dania Beach, Florida-based airline.
Spirit Airlines Has “Every Expectation” That it Will Be in Operation for “Many Years to Come”
A Spirit Airlines A320-271N at Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines via Facebook
Spirit insists it remains committed to operating as a stand-alone ULCC.
Duncan Dee says Spirit has no intention of going anywhere.
“Spirit is responsible for making low fares available to consumers for more than 30 years,” he said. “We have every expectation to continue doing so for many years to come.”
Still, its future remains highly uncertain. Industry analysts note that Spirit has not achieved a full-year profit since 2019, and with competitive pressures mounting, the road to recovery will be steep. Some suggest that another merger attempt may be inevitable, while others believe Spirit may need further cuts to achieve stability.
The decision to withdraw from 11 cities—including major West Coast markets such as San Diego, San Jose, and Portland, alongside smaller stations like Chattanooga and Columbia—marks a turning point for Spirit Airlines. Once known for rapid expansion and aggressive fare competition, the airline is now in survival mode, shrinking to preserve resources and protect its strongest hubs.
Whether this leaner network can restore profitability remains to be seen. What is certain is that Spirit’s retrenchment will reshape the ULCC landscape, reducing competition and leaving travelers with fewer low-cost options. And that’s not good for anybody.”
WestJet’s record Boeing order cements its loyalty to the US planemaker and positions the Canadian carrier for long-term growth and global expansion.
WestJet has doubled down on its Boeing-first strategy with a record-setting fleet order that cements its loyalty to the US planemaker and positions the Canadian carrier for long-term growth.
On Wednesday, 3 September, WestJet and Boeing announced the carrier’s largest-ever aircraft purchase: 60 Boeing 737-10 aircraft with options for 25 more, plus seven 787-9 Dreamliners and four additional options.
The deliveries will roll out through 2034, underlining the airline’s multibillion-dollar expansion plan.
Loyalty Forged Since 1996
A WestJet Boeing 737-200 at Calgary International Airport (YYC) in 1998 | IMAGE: By Paul Davey – https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=16966499
Since its first flights in February 1996, when it operated just three Boeing 737-200s, WestJet has built its brand and fleet exclusively around Boeing aircraft.
That consistency continues today as the airline grows into a pan-Canadian powerhouse. The order also ensures that WestJet will remain the only Canadian mainline airline operating an all-Boeing fleet well into the next decade.
Stephanie Pope, president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, called the deal an endorsement of Boeing’s role in WestJet’s success.
“We are honored that WestJet has once again placed its trust in Boeing with a major investment that builds on our three decades of partnership and solidifies their fleet for the decades ahead,” Pope said. “We look forward to supporting WestJet’s exciting growth as they leverage the 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner to serve even more guests with great efficiency and comfort.”
Record-Setting Commitment
WestJet Boeing 737 MAX 8 in flight | IMAGE: WestJet
This deal marks the largest aircraft order ever placed by a Canadian carrier, and the scale is substantial. WestJet now has 123 aircraft and 40 options on its order book. The new purchases lift its backlog of the yet-to-be-certified 737-10 to 107 units, with certification currently expected in 2026. On the long-haul side, the airline will double its 787-9 Dreamliner fleet from seven to 14 aircraft.
With the addition of these aircraft, WestJet has the largest order book of any airline in Canada and will double our fleet of Dreamliners.
Alexis von Hoensbroech | WestJet CEO
CEO Alexis von Hoensbroech underscored the dual importance of growth and affordability.
“With the addition of these aircraft, WestJet has the largest order book of any airline in Canada and will double our fleet of Dreamliners, underpinning our growth plans and our commitment to affordable travel options for Canadians from coast to coast and exciting career paths for our people,” von Hoensbroech said. “These highly efficient and comfortable aircraft are critical to the growth and renewal of our fleet and will also significantly improve our fuel consumption.”
Political and Regional Support
A WestJet Boeing 737 MAX 8 at Calgary International Airport (YYC) | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order drew immediate praise from government leaders. Canada’s Minister of Transport and Internal Trade, Chrystia Freeland, framed the agreement as a “pragmatic approach to doing business, creating new opportunities, economic benefits, and long-term jobs on both sides of the border.”
Meanwhile, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith called the deal proof of Alberta’s growing aviation profile.
“I’m thrilled to see this historic purchase agreement between WestJet and Boeing. Not only does this represent WestJet’s largest-ever aircraft order, but it also reinforces Alberta’s growing reputation, both nationally and internationally, as a leading aerospace and aviation hub.”
Alberta is not only the home of WestJet, which is based at Calgary International Airport (YYC), but also the focus city of Edmonton (YEG).
WestJet’s Fleet in Context
Lineup of WestJet aircraft. WestJet’s record Boeing order will double the size of the Calgary-based carrier’s Dreamliner fleet | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet currently operates 157 Boeing aircraft:
36 Boeing 737-700s
58 Boeing 737-800s
56 Boeing 737 MAX 8s
7 Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners
A WestJet Encore De Havilland Canada DHC-8-400 | IMAGE: WestJet
Its regional affiliate, WestJet Encore, adds 35 De Havilland Canada Dash 8-400 turboprops, while WestJet Cargo further broadens the group’s scope. With WestJet’s record Boeing order, WestJet will hold the largest order book of any Canadian carrier.
Aircraft Type
In Service
On Order (Firm)
On Order (Options)
Boeing 737-700
36
0
0
Boeing 737-800
58
0
0
Boeing 737 MAX 8
56
0
0
Boeing 737-10 MAX (On Order)
0
107
25
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner
7
0
0
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner (New Orders)
0
7
4
De Havilland Canada Dash 8-400 (WestJet Encore)
35
0
0
Total
192
114
29
WestJet is Positioning Itself as a Major Player in North American Aviation
A WestJet Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner in flight. WestJet’s record Boeing order will double the size of the Calgary-based carrier’s Dreamliner fleet | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order comes as the carrier consolidates its position as Canada’s second-largest airline and the eighth largest in North America by frequency.
Last year, it carried more than 25 million passengers across a network of over 100 destinations spanning North America, the Caribbean, Europe, Asia, and Central America. Calgary International Airport (YYC) remains its primary hub, with Toronto Pearson (YYZ) as a secondary hub and a strong presence in Vancouver (YVR), Edmonton (YEG), Halifax (YHZ), Montreal (YUL), St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador (YYT), and Winnipeg (YWG).
WestJet has also reshaped its portfolio through acquisitions and brand integration. In 2022, it acquired Sunwing, and in 2023, it folded its ultra-low-cost carrier Swoop into mainline operations to streamline its offerings. These moves, combined with the new Boeing commitments, point to a strategy aimed at balancing affordable domestic service with competitive long-haul expansion.
What’s Good News for WestJet is Great News for Boeing
WestJet Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner | IMAGE: WestJet
WestJet’s record Boeing order is more than just numbers on a balance sheet. It’s a clear signal that the airline is doubling down on the Boeing 737 MAX and 787 Dreamliner as the backbone of its fleet for years to come.
For Boeing, the deal couldn’t come at a better time. It will add momentum as the OEM juggernaut pushes to steady production and stay ahead of Airbus in the global market.
For WestJet, the move marks a turning point. It guarantees the airline will stay a Boeing customer well into the next decade while giving it the muscle to expand both at home and overseas. What started in 1996 as a scrappy Western Canadian upstart is now one of North America’s most prominent players.
With Canada’s largest aircraft order book and a renewed tie to Boeing, WestJet is setting up its next chapter: keeping fares affordable for Canadian travelers while reaching deeper into international skies — with its future written firmly in Renton and Everett steel.
In 1907, British aerospace inventor Horatio Frederick Phillips designed and tested a plane with 200 individual wings. Coming four years after the Wright Brothers’ historic first flight, Phillips’ plane made what was probably the first manned, powered flight in the United Kingdom. Horatio Phillips also studied aeronautics and earned several patents for cambered, or curved, wing surfaces.
View from the back of the Horatio Phillips multiplane with 200 airfoils in a venetian blind configuration. | Image: Public Domain
Phillips’ 1907 Multiplane had 200 Wings
It would be difficult to imagine a more striking, unique aircraft than Phillips’ 1907 design called the “multiplane.” The wings, resembling venetian blinds, had four sets of 50 airfoils. They were connected in a cage structure.
The aircraft was made of wood and had a 22-horsepower engine that could move it to a take-off speed of about 30 miles per hour. It also had an eight-foot diameter propeller and weighed about 500 pounds without a pilot.
Multiplane Makes First Manned Flight in United Kingdom
Phillips’ first flight with the multiplane took place on 6 April 1907, and he flew about 500 feet. Some disputed that it was a true manned flight, as the pilot had no way of controlling it. One unique feature of the multiplane was that its wings were cambered, or curved, something that he had already become well known for.
Horatio Phillips’ 1904 aircraft had 50 wings. | Image: aerospaceweb.org
In 1904, Phillips had designed and tested another plane with a venetian blind design. This one had a relatively few 20 wings. He also built its 22-horsepower water-cooled 4-cylinder engine himself. This plane had a tail section in the shape of a cross and a three-wheel undercarriage.
Horatio Phillips’ first attempt with a multi-wing plane came in 1893. He designed it with 50 wings in a similar venetian blind arrangement as the other models. The blinds, or wings, were about 20 feet long and set about two inches apart. The propeller was turned by a coal-fired engine, producing about nine miles per hour.
Phillips tested his 1893 aircraft, powered by a coal-fired engine, on a circular wooden track. | Image: aerospaceweb.org
Phillips tested this aircraft on a circular track, which was 100 feet in diameter and made of wooden planks four feet wide. The aircraft had no pilot, so Phillips attached it to a central post with wires. Once it reached 40 miles per hour, it lifted to just two or three feet.
These aircraft were not Phillips’ only experience with aeronautics. Before designing the aircraft, he studied airfoils and how they could produce lift.
Cayley Studies Airfoil Concepts in the 1850s
In the 1850s, English engineer George Cayley was the first to study the concept of heavier-than-air flight. During his research, he discovered that curved surfaces produced more lift than flat ones. He also saw the effectiveness of streamlining and balance for an aircraft.
In 1852, he designed, built, and tested the world’s first fixed-wing glider that could carry a person. This earned Cayley the title of “Father of Aerodynamics.”
Philips received a patent for these airfoil concepts, which he based on the shapes of bird wings. | Image: aeronautical-journal_1908
He even built his own wind tunnel to test his ideas. It had a steam injector that pulled air into its entrance, creating an air flow that he used to test his concepts.
Phillips Receives Patent For His Ideas
Phillips’ airfoils were curved more on the top than on the bottom, which gave them the name “double-surface airfoils.” In 1894, he received a patent for eight of his designs. Phillips later used his airfoils on his venetian blind-style planes, and aircraft designers worldwide began using Phillips’ ideas on more modern aircraft.
In March of 1990, my KC-10 crew was tasked to support a naval exercise over the Mediterranean Sea.
The USS Eisenhower was in the eastern Med and about to be relieved by the USS Forrestal, entering the Med from the west. Whenever the Navy had two aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea, they would simulate a war game against each other. Our KC-10 was temporarily based out of Naval Air Station (NAS) Sigonella, at the sole of the boot, near Catania, Italy.
NAS Sigonella, Italy | IMAGE: By Civa61 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=50526269
I was a new copilot, flying one of my first overseas trips with my assigned aircraft commander, Jeff McAllister, flight engineer Reagan Moon, and boom operator, Russ. We’d provide refueling support to all takers, not favoring one ship over the other.
After our first day of the exercise refueling Navy F-14 Tomcats, F-18 Hornets, and EA-6B electronic jamming Prowlers, we received permission for an aircraft carrier fly-by. Everyone remembers the Top Gun scene where Tom Cruise zoomed past the carrier in his super-fast F-14, spilling the coffee of the officer on deck. Ours was nothing like that, let’s just say.
We dialed up the Eisenhower’s TACAN radio navigation beam to guide us to the ship and set up for the approach as if it were a runway. Once at 200 feet above the water, Jeff offset from the ship’s centerline and flew along the port, or left side, of the ship. We then executed a low approach, retracting our landing gear and flaps, and flew back around the carrier for a “high-speed” pass at 250 knots (290 mph). Our little airshow completed, we headed back to Sigonella for the day.
Grounded KC-10, Lucky Break: Hitching a Ride on a C-2 Greyhound
A U.S. Air Force KC-10 Extender at Naval Air Station Sigonella in 2021 | IMAGE: US Marine Corps photo by Sgt. William Chockey
Although our fairly new KC-10 was pretty reliable, this particular aircraft had a maintenance issue on Day 2 of the exercise. A vital piece of equipment for our electrical system, called the transformer rectifier, stopped working, and the plane was grounded until that part could be replaced.
Our KC-10 was parked on the Navy ramp near several C-2 Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, which were twin-turboprop small airplanes used to ferry men and equipment out to the aircraft carriers. I jokingly asked my AC, Jeff, if we could get a ride on the C-2. We figured it didn’t hurt to ask. Walking into the small squadron building, we found a Navy O-3 lieutenant behind the scheduling desk. I strolled up and said, “Hi. We are with the KC-10 sitting out there, but it’s broken today. What’s it take to get a flight on a C-2?”
He looked down at his pad of paper and, without any hesitation, said, “I have one leaving at 1500 (3:00 p.m.) for the Eisenhower. Wanna go? I can add you all to the flight manifest.”
“Sure!” we answered with a smile. Jeff and I headed back outside to tell our flight engineer, Reagan, and boom operator, Russ, that we had arranged for us all to fly out to the USS Eisenhower.
The C-2 crew gave us our protective headgear and inflatable life vests and showed us to the aft-facing seats in the cargo hold of the small plane. The four of us couldn’t believe our luck as we took off and headed for the same aircraft carrier we had just flown by the day before.
Life Aboard the USS Eisenhower
Official US Navy photo taken during the ship’s 10th Med Cruise (1998) | IMAGE: By US Navy – Public Domain
The C-2 had very few windows, and they were tiny at that, so knowing where we were in relation to the carrier was difficult. The plane entered the arrival pattern for landing aircraft and made a series of hard 90-degree turns, throwing us from side to side, until we finally lined up on final approach. The trap landing was very sudden, and the quick deceleration after catching the cable felt like the end of a roller coaster ride when the coaster car comes screeching back into the station. It was all very abrupt.
We deplaned and looked around the massive carrier as men in their khaki naval uniforms looked down at us from the Crow’s Nest high above the flight deck. One of the men was a Chief Petty Officer who volunteered to take us on an impromptu tour of his big ship.
We strolled through the narrow hallways, crouching low to avoid banging our heads on various gray doors, up and down numerous staircases, and into the flight rooms of the Naval flying squadrons assigned to the ship for that sea tour. I gave my day-old copy of the Stars and Stripes military newspaper to a Naval aviator, and he sarcastically remarked, “Oh yeah. Y’all get to ‘Go Navy’ for all of one day!”
090719-N-6854D-001
ATLANTIC OCEAN (July 19, 2009) A French Dassault Rafale fighter aircraft conducts touch and go landings aboard the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) during a coalition training exercise. The Eisenhower Carrier Strike Group is operating in the U.S. 6th Fleet area of responsibility after a scheduled five month deployment in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility supporting Operation Enduring Freedom and maritime security operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Jon Dasbach/Released)
Our single day was much easier to enjoy than his six months at sea.
Eventually our tour ended up in the Flight Operations Center, where we got to meet the Air Boss, a Navy O-6 captain in charge of the launch and recovery of the ship’s air fleet. He asked, “Were y’all the crew that flew by yesterday?”
“Yes, sir. That was us,” Jeff answered with a grin. “What did you think of it?”
He smiled back and remarked, “Well, that high-speed pass was nothing, since we have Tomcats. But the low-speed approach and go around was very impressive! Your tail engine was shooting up a rooster tail in the water. Now that was cool.”
Unknown to us, our KC-10 (DC-10-30) tail engine had created a giant spray in the ocean behind us.
The Air Boss then asked, “How long will y’all be onboard?”
Jeff replied, “We have to get back to Sigonella today to coordinate the repair of our KC-10.”
Due to the time zone difference, the maintenance personnel back at Barksdale AFB, Louisiana, were not even aware at this point that our jet was broken.
The Air Boss then remarked, “That’s too bad. If you stayed the night, I’d probably be able to get you a Tomcat (F-14) ride in the morning.”
We couldn’t believe that opportunity, but really had to get back to shore since our C-2 plane was preparing to depart. As we crossed the carrier’s flight deck, I told Jeff, “It would almost be worth the Article 15 (military punishment) to stay the night and get that flight!”
Cat Shots, Delays, and Italian Adventures
050518-N-0226M-177 Pacific Ocean (May 18, 2005) – Topside Safety Petty Officer, Aviation BoatswainÕs Mate Jeffery Fournier, clears the launch area as he signals to the Catapult Officer that a C-2A Greyhound, assigned to the “Providers” of Fleet Logistics Squadron Three Zero (VRC 30), is ready for to be launched from the flight deck of USS Ronald Reagan (CVN 76). Reagan is currently underway in the Pacific Ocean conducting carrier qualifications for West Coast Fleet Replacement Squadrons. | IMAGE: U.S. Navy photo by Senior Chief Photographer’s Mate Mahlon K. Miller (RELEASED)
We strapped into the back of the COD, and the enlisted crewmember briefed us on what to expect during the catapult launch, or “Cat Shot.” Because we were facing backwards, we needed to cross our arms across our chest and cross our feet at the ankles, then brace for the departure. Otherwise, the instant G-forces of the launch would make our arms and legs fly out uncontrollably in front of us.
We did as told and heard the two turboprop engines rev up to takeoff rpm. In a flash, the plane lurched forward, and we could feel the blood rushing to our cheeks and eyes as we strained to keep our arms and legs close to our bodies. Within seconds, the rapid acceleration ended, and we were airborne in what felt like a calm, floating sensation after that violent takeoff. I looked at my friends’ faces, and we were all bright red from the rush of blood created by the G-forces. Within an hour, we were back on terra firma, and Jeff placed a call back to Barksdale to explain our maintenance issue.
The good news for our crew was that the replacement part would be sent to us on a C-141 cargo plane leaving the States and flying a routine resupply mission throughout the Mediterranean region. This meant our broken KC-10 would remain on the ground for another four days. Enough time to tour southern Italy and go on another C-2 flight!
The four of us toured Palermo and walked on Roman ruins, then enjoyed authentic Italian pasta and pizza with glasses of red wine each evening. Quite a cultural and worldly experience for guys in their late twenties. Days later, we headed back to the C-2 squadron and scheduled another flight, but this time to the older USS Forrestal. The landing and tour were very much like the first event on the Ike, but I wanted to experiment on the next catapult takeoff. I purposely relaxed my arms and legs, resting my hands on my knees.
As the C-2 shot forward with me facing the back of the plane, my arms and legs involuntarily flew out in front of me, parallel to the floor. With all my strength, I could not bring them back close to my body until the rapid acceleration subsided. We all looked at each other again, red-faced and laughing like kids at a carnival.
Go Navy! (For Two Days): When My KC-10 Crew Catapulted Off the USS Eisenhower 25
New Release Alert! This October, bestselling author David Dale invites you to take flight on an inspiring journey of personal growth, resilience, and adventure—perfect for aspiring pilots, military history buffs, and anyone seeking a story of perseverance and triumph! Aviation Therapy is a deeply personal aviation memoir—an intersection of extraordinary world events and one man’s transformation through flight. Packed with gripping firsthand accounts and invaluable life lessons, Aviation Therapy is “Chicken Soup for the Skies”—a testament to how aviation can shape character, build confidence, and inspire a sense of purpose.
Pre-order now on Amazon and be among the first to experience Aviation Therapy—available 21 October 2025.
On 27 August 2025, Gulfstream made it official: the very first G800 has been delivered.
The lucky owner remains anonymous (for now), but what we do know is that this new flagship is something incredibly special.
After clearing both FAA and EASA certification back in April 2025, the G800 is now out in the world: fully mature, flight-ready, and ready to take private aviation even further. Literally.
So what’s all the buzz about? If you’ve been tracking Gulfstream’s evolution from the G650 to the G700 and now to the G800, you’ll know this jet had big shoes to fill. And it does. It’s got style, speed, and a cabin that feels more like a luxury apartment than a pressurized tube.
Here are the seven standout features that make the G800 Gulfstream’s most epic aircraft yet.
1. It Flies Farther Than Anything Else Out There
Map showing the range of the G800 from Dallas. Only the shaded area is outside of the G800’s range (if Dallas is the starting point) | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
Let’s start with what everyone’s talking about: range. The G800 now claims the title of the longest-range business jet in the world (at least until the elusive BBJ 777X debuts).
Cruise Speed
Range (nautical miles)
Mach 0.85
8,200 nm
Mach 0.87
8,000 nm
Mach 0.90
7,000 nm
City Pair
Distance (approx.)
Sydney ➝ Dallas
8,200 nm
Los Angeles ➝ Dubai
8,000 nm
London ➝ Perth
7,500 nm
That’s enough to get you from Sydney to Dallas or Los Angeles to Dubai without stopping. I don’t know about you, but the G800’s range is truly something to behold. It’s a game-changer for anyone who flies globally and values efficiency. No layovers, no fuel stops. Just point A to point B at high speed, high altitude, and high comfort.
In a word: wow.
2. An Interior Worthy of an Art Gallery
G800 Interior with crew compartment in foreground | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
While the G800 certainly boasts some mind-blowing numbers, its allure goes far beyond. To give you an idea of just how masterfully designed it is, the G800 was the winner of the 2025 International Yacht & Aviation Award, a coveted award presented by leading interior design magazine design et al and leading yacht and aviation design magazine Luxe et al.
You’ll find handcrafted details throughout — from the onyx leather seating with diamond stitching to cabinetry finished in Dark Wenge wood. There’s woven mélange on the sidewalls, polished white stone flooring, and a warm, earthy color palette that feels equal parts luxury lounge and executive suite.
Diagram showing 3 living areas and a crew compartment on the G800 | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
You can choose up to four living areas or go with three plus a dedicated crew rest compartment. There’s seating for up to 19 and sleeping arrangements for 10. Aft, there’s a spacious lav with a vanity and wardrobe.
Up front, the galley comes in Gulfstream’s largest configuration with generous storage and counter space.
It is obvious that Gulfstream has painstakingly designed every inch of this aircraft to support globe-spanning missions in total comfort.
G800 Cabin Interior | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
A tour of the G800’s interior
3. A Whisper-Quiet, Wellness-Centric Cabin
You know Gulfstream takes passenger comfort seriously, but the G800 takes it to a new level. The cabin altitude (how pressurized the interior of the aircraft is relative to sea level conditions) is just 2,840 feet — even when you’re cruising at 41,000 — and it’s filled with 100% fresh air that’s completely replaced every two to three minutes.
The cabin altitude is just 2,840 feet — even when you’re cruising at 41,000 — and it’s filled with 100% fresh air that’s completely replaced every two to three minutes | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
The G800 incorporates sixteen Gulfstream Panoramic Oval Windows | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
There’s also a plasma ionization purification system onboard, which helps neutralize viruses, bacteria, and allergens. Combine that with whisper-quiet noise levels and circadian rhythm lighting, and you’ve got an environment that’s genuinely restorative, even on 15-hour legs. Yes, please.
And those windows. Sixteen of Gulfstream’s coveted Panoramic Oval Windows—the biggest you’ll find on any business jet—flood the cabin with natural light. Beyond the amazing views, the brightness helps create a wellness-focused environment, keeping passengers more alert and less fatigued on long flights.
4. The Flight Deck Is a Pilot’s Dream
G800 flight deck | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
For those who care about what’s happening up front (and we know you do), the G800’s Symmetry Flight Deck is something to behold.
The G800 is equipped with active control sidesticks, a fly-by-wire system that provides real-time tactile feedback by synchronizing pilot inputs through electronically linked controls. This enhances crew coordination and situational awareness by allowing each pilot to sense the other’s control actions. It’s a significant advancement in human-machine interface. Originally introduced by Gulfstream, this system remains unique within the business aviation sector and is also found on the G500, G600, and G700.
The flight deck also includes ten touchscreen displays integrated with Gulfstream’s Phase-of-Flight intelligence, which organizes information based on the current stage of flight. This helps reduce pilot workload, improves operational flow, and shortens aircraft startup time.
Gulfstream’s Combined Vision System (CVS) merges the Synthetic Vision System (SVS) and Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) into a single image on the head-up display | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
Gulfstream’s Combined Vision System (CVS) merges the Synthetic Vision System (SVS) and Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) into a single image on the head-up display. This unified view is not only really cool but genuinely useful, enhancing situational awareness, especially when operating in unfamiliar environments or low-visibility conditions.
If you’re already type-rated on a G700 or G650, you’ll feel right at home. The high degree of cockpit commonality across Gulfstream’s large-cabin fleet means less time transitioning between aircraft and more time in the air.
Gulfstream’s Flight Deck for the 21st Century
5. It’s Fast, Efficient, and Surprisingly Nimble
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
As if its capabilities weren’t already clear, the G800 combines long-range performance with impressive speed and short-field operation.
Max speed: Mach 0.935
Initial cruise altitude: 41,000 feet
Max cruise altitude: 51,000 feet
Takeoff distance (MTOW): just 5,812 feet
The G800 is powered by Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
That last number is important. It means the G800 can operate from many airports typically off-limits to ultra-long-range jets. And thanks to the Rolls-Royce Pearl 700 engines and advanced Daher winglets, the aircraft gets 33% better fuel efficiency compared to older Gulfstream models. You’re going farther, faster, and burning less fuel to do it.
The Gulfstream G800 features advanced Daher winglets, as seen out one of the G800’s panoramic windows | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
6. Scale That Serves a Purpose
Yes, this jet is massive for its class, but in the best possible way.
Think cathedral ceilings meets private club lounge. With a cabin height of 6 ft 3 in, even the tallest passengers won’t feel like they’re ducking through the flight. At 8 ft 2 in wide and nearly 47 feet long, the space feels more like a living room that just happens to be 40,000 feet in the air. That’s 2,138 cubic feet of room to stretch, stroll, or simply enjoy the fact that you’re not wedged into a seat like on commercial flights.
The numbers on paper are equally impressive: a 6,200-pound payload, 105,600-pound max takeoff weight, and a 195-cubic-foot baggage compartment…which, let’s be honest, means you can pack for every mood. Skis? Golf clubs? Three different wardrobes, just in case? Bring them all.
The beauty here is that the jet doesn’t just look big; it knows how to use its size. It really doesn’t matter if you’re flying a full passenger load or setting up shop for a long-haul business trip; there’s space for people, for gear, and for a few creature comforts that make the journey feel less like transit and more like arrival.
Spec
Measurement
Cabin Height
6 ft 3 in
Cabin Width
8 ft 2 in
Cabin Length (excluding baggage)
46 ft 10 in
Cabin Volume
2,138 cu ft
Baggage Volume
195 cu ft
Maximum Payload
6,200 lb
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)
105,600 lb
Gulfstream G800 High Altitude Testing
7. It’s the $72.5M Pinnacle of the Gulfstream Evolution
The Gulfstream business jet lineup, including the G280, G400, G500, G600, G700, and G800 | IMAGE: Gulfstream
The G800 may be Gulfstream’s newest model, but it’s also the culmination of years of the Savannah-based company’s legacy of innovation. It builds on the strengths of the G650, G650ER, and G700, combining their best qualities into a purpose-built, future-ready aircraft. It officially replaces the G650, which wrapped production in early 2025.
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
With an estimated base price of $72.5 million, the G800 is Gulfstream’s next-generation flagship. It enters service with extraordinary program maturity, having benefited from everything the company learned in developing the G700. The first unit rolled out of Gulfstream’s completion facility at Appleton International Airport (ATW) in Wisconsin, which is the same place where the company handles large-cabin outfitting and painting/finishing.
But really, the G800 reflects the work of over 21,000 people across the company, all pushing for one thing: to raise the bar again.
And they did.
G800: Paint Precision in Every Layer
A New Benchmark
G800 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace
With the G800, Gulfstream has set the benchmark for what long-range, large-cabin aviation can and should be. For pilots, it’s a cockpit that feels like the future. For operators, it’s efficiency wrapped in performance. For passengers, it’s comfort taken to a level few thought possible. And for those of us who just love airplanes, it’s one of those rare designs that makes you stop and stare.
This is the future of private aviation, and it has arrived with authority. The G800 flies farther, climbs faster, whispers quieter, and thinks smarter than anything that came before it.
And let’s be real — it’s also the coolest jet on the planet right now.
Behind the scenes video of the G800’s first flight
For the second time in a year, Spirit Airlines files for bankruptcy, pledging to cut costs and refocus on profitable markets.
Spirit Airlines has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy for the second time in less than a year, highlighting just how tough the skies have become for the ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC) model in today’s turbulent aviation market.
The Dania Beach, Fla.–based airline announced on Friday, 29 August, that it has commenced a voluntary restructuring process in the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Spirit insists that flights, ticket sales, reservations, loyalty redemptions, and day-to-day operations will continue as normal during the process.
From Quick Fix to Deep Overhaul
IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit previously filed for Chapter 11 in November 2024, emerging just four months later in March with a leaner balance sheet after creditors swapped debt for equity. At that time, management avoided dramatic changes such as significant fleet reductions or network shrinkage, hoping cost discipline and equity infusions would stabilize the carrier.
That bet has not paid off. Since exiting bankruptcy in March, Spirit reported losses approaching $257 million by the end of June, compared with a forecast profit of $252 million. Persistently high operating costs, weaker domestic fares, and a glut of US seat capacity dragged the ULCC back into financial distress.
Earlier this month, Spirit Airlines even issued a going-concern warning, admitting at the time that there was “substantial doubt” about the company’s ability to keep operating over the next 12 months without drastic changes or an infusion of cash.
It seems that the writing may have already been on the wall at that point.
Now, CEO Dave Davis says Spirit must go further:
It has become clear that there is much more work to be done, and many more tools are available to best position Spirit for the future. A court-supervised process is the best path forward to make the changes needed to ensure our long-term success.
Dave Davis, Spirit Airlines President and Chief Executive Officer
Key Elements of the Restructuring Plan
A Spirit Airlines A320-271N departs from Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines via Facebook
Spirit’s new bankruptcy strategy calls for broad, structural changes rather than quick fixes. Among its stated priorities:
Network Redesign: The carrier will double down on its focus cities, providing more frequencies and connectivity while exiting underperforming markets.
Fleet Optimization: Spirit will “rightsize” its Airbus narrowbody fleet to better match profitable demand, reducing lease obligations and targeting hundreds of millions in annual savings.
Cost Structure Adjustments: Building on its reputation as an industry cost leader, Spirit plans additional efficiencies across operations.
Product Segmentation: The airline will lean into its tiered offerings—Spirit First, Premium Economy, and its core Value fare—giving travelers more premium upsell opportunities while maintaining its ULCC ethos.
Unlike its last trip through bankruptcy, this restructuring explicitly acknowledges the need to shrink and realign both network and fleet, which are moves that aircraft lessors and creditors have reportedly been pushing for.
While Chapter 11 Is Common in US Aviation, a Second Filing in One Year Sets a New Precedent
A Spirit Airlines Airbus A320neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines
Spirit is hardly alone in using Chapter 11 as a survival tool. Virtually every major US carrier has done so at some point, from United and Delta in the early 2000s to American after the 2008 financial crisis.
But, as Spirit Airlines files for bankruptcy for the second time in less than a year, it is unprecedented for a major US airline in recent history. The company faces an uphill battle: ongoing competition from Frontier Airlines, which just announced 20 new routes targeting Spirit’s markets, and lingering operational pressures, including the Pratt & Whitney GTF engine recall that grounded portions of its A320neo fleet.
Add to this the fallout of a failed merger with JetBlue—blocked in federal court in 2024—and Spirit finds itself squeezed on all sides.
What It Means for Passengers and the Industry
IMAGES: Allegiant/Avelo/Breeze/Frontier via Facebook, Spirit via Photo by David Syphers on Unsplash
For now, Spirit insists travelers will see little change. Flights are operating, loyalty perks remain intact, and employees will continue receiving pay and benefits. Yet history shows that deeper restructuring often means fewer aircraft, fewer routes, and a smaller footprint. We’ve said this before, but it is hard to imagine that this new filing won’t have a massive effect on Spirit’s operations.
For the rest of the airline industry, Spirit’s struggles raise bigger questions about the future of the ULCC model in a market increasingly dominated by the Big Four. With domestic yields under pressure and capacity growth outpacing demand, leaner carriers like Spirit may have to evolve—or risk extinction.
Here’s Hoping for a Good Outcome
Spirit’s website for its restructuring, www.spiritrestructuring.com, offers transparency to passengers and stakeholders as the process unfolds. But for most, the real story will be whether Spirit’s “reset” finally delivers a sustainable business model—or if this is the beginning of the end for America’s largest budget airline.
For now, the yellow jets still fly, but the road ahead will test just how much turbulence the ULCC model can withstand. Our hearts go out to our readers who are in any way connected to Spirit, whether they’re pilots, flight attendants, maintenance crew, or airport personnel. We at Avgeekery wish our friends at Spirit nothing but the very best.
F-4 Phantom fighter pilot ACE, Randy “Duke” Cunningham, has died at age 83. His decorated Navy career in the Vietnam war became the stuff of legend, after shooting down 5 enemy MiGs – and being shot down himself.
He would go on to become a Top Gun instructor and commander of VF-126, with a distinguished 20-year military career. His later life as a politician, however, would see him shot down again, convicted of taking bribes from defense contractors (later pardoned by President Trump).
Vietnam War gets its first Ace
Cunningham was the first fighter ACE in Vietnam, and the Navy’s top-scoring fighter pilot of the war. The young Lieutenant was flying F-4J Phantoms off the USS Constellation, assigned to VF-96 FIGHTING FALCONS, when he flew into aviation history.
It was his second tour, and it wasn’t long before he and his RIO, Lieutenant “Willy” Driscoll, began stacking up kills. The first came on January 19, 1972, when they engaged two MiG-21s and shot down one with a sidewinder.
Their next kill came 4 months later, when they engaged 3 MiGs on May 8. Two of the MiGs were chasing them, while Cunningham chased and shot down the third MiG, which was chasing their wingman.
F-4 Fighter Ace Duke Cunningham has Died 52
They wouldn’t have to wait another 4 months to earn their next kills. The next 3 would all come on the same flight, just 2 days later.
Flying as call sign “Showtime 100”, Cunningham and Driscoll racked up their next kills on a flak suppression mission south of Hanoi. They engaged in an intense aerial battle with over 20 enemy fighters, shooting down 2 MiGs and saving their Executive Officer, before heading to the coast back to the boat.
Another MiG, however, had other ideas. Cunningham and Driscoll were in for the dogfight of their lives, and it was flying at them head-on.
VF-96 F-4J Phantoms, including “Showtime 100”, executing a strike over Vietnam
One of the most epic dogfights of the jet age
What took place next is arguably one of the most epic dogfights of the jet age. As the MiG approached Cunningham pulled straight up, as bullets whizzed by his canopy. The MiG, which sucked in climb performance compared to a Phantom, followed anyway.
“I pulled hard up in the vertical, figuring that the MiG would keep right on going for home. I looked back and…there was the MiG… canopy to canopy with me! He couldn’t have been more than thirty feet away…I could see the pilot clearly…leather helmet, goggles, scarf… we were both going straight up, but I was outzooming him. He fell behind, and as I came over the top, he started shooting. I had given him a predictable flight path and lie had taken advantage of it. The tracers were missing me, but not by much! I rolled out, and he pulled in right behind me.
Showtime 100 showing off its Sidewinder and Sparrow missiles
I pulled down and I was holding top rudder, trying to knuckle at the nose. As soon as I committed my nose, he pulled right into me! I waited for his nose to commit, then I pulled up into him. We separated, turned around, and engaged again. Same thing. Up into a rolling scissors…advantage, disadvantage…advantage disadvantage… disadvantage… disadvantage… disengaged, came hack, engaged again, and went up in the vertical again. This is one of the very few MiGs that ever fought in the vertical. We kept engaging. and I never could get enough advantage on him to get a shot. Everything my airplane did, he reacted to instinctively.
The next time we started up in the vertical, an idea came to me. I went to idle and speed brakes, and he shot out in front of me! I think it really surprised him… being out in front for the first time. Anyway, we’re both going straight up and losing speed fast. I was down to 150 knots and I knew I was going to have to go to full burner to hold it. I did, and we both pitched over the top. As he came over, I used rudder to get the airplane to turn to his belly side. He lost lift coming over the top, and, I think, departed the airplane a bit. He had stayed too long. He was low on fuel, and I think he decided to run. He pitched over the top and started straight down. I went after him and, though I didn’t think the Sidewinder would guide straight down with all the heat of the ground to look at, I squeezed one off anyway.
F-4 Fighter Ace Duke Cunningham has Died 53
The missile came oil the rail and went to his airplane. There was just a little flash, and I thought, ‘God, it missed him!’ I started to fire my last Sidewinder and suddenly…a big flash of flame and black smoke erupted from his airplane. He didn’t seem to go out of control, but he flew straight down into the ground. He didn’t get out.”
Showtime 100 was shot down, shortly after scoring the Ace kill
Showtime 100 did not have long to celebrate. They were not safe yet, and were shot down by a SAM on their way back to the carrier.
The jet, however, was still operating, just crippled. Cunningham worked hard to keep it in the air, as he wanted to avoid becoming a POW. Eventually the jet gave out, going into an uncontrollable spin. Both crew ejected, and were picked up by a search and rescue helicopter.
Safely back on the carrier, Cunningham shares his story about shooting down 3 MiGs and being shot down himself to his comrades
For his efforts on that day, Cunningham received the Navy Cross.
From decorated Navy ace fighter pilot to convicted crooked Congressman
Both airmen would go on and become instructors at Top Gun. Cunningham went on to serve with VF-154 and eventually became CO of VF-126, an adversary unit playing the role of bad guys to train pilots in aerial combat.
Cunningham retired from the Navy as a commander in 1987. He started an aviation marketing company and became a Dean at an aviation school. He also became a regular on mainstream news as a military expert, bringing him to the attention of many politicians.
He won election easily in 1991, becoming a Republican congressman representing the wealthy suburbs north of San Diego.
His goals however, were not driven by public service, but by greed, and it ended up putting him in prison for several years. Cunningham resigned from the House in late 2005, after pleading guilty to federal charges for accepting at least $2.4 million in bribes from defense contractors and under reporting his income. He pleaded guilty to tax evasion, conspiracy to commit bribery, mail fraud and wire fraud. Cunningham received a sentence of 8 years, 4 month in prison and pay $1.8 million in restitution.
He ended up serving 7 years, and was later pardoned by President Trump.
After release, he moved to Arkansas, and devoted much of his time to family, faith, and spoke often to military and civic groups about his life experiences. He was also President of the American Fighter Aces Association (AFAA).
They are the invisible heroes. The quiet heroes. The ones whose deeds go unnoticed.
One such hero is RK Smithley, an aerial firefighter with an outfit called 10 Tanker Air Carrier. I had the extreme honor of sitting down with him recently to talk about what he does on a daily basis. I am positive he wouldn’t want to be called a hero, but in a very real sense, he is precisely that.
Based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, 10 Tanker Air Carrier operates a fleet of four DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft, each modified into a very large air tanker (VLAT) capable of delivering 9,400 gallons of fire retardant to combat wildfires across the United States and beyond. At the controls of one of these aerial giants is Captain RK Smithley, a veteran pilot whose journey from a small town in western Pennsylvania to the cockpit of a firefighting DC-10 is a tale of passion, precision, and purpose.
With a career spanning 25 years at World Airways, a stint in corporate aviation, and now 11 years with 10 Tanker, Smithley’s story is one of the most captivating I’ve ever heard. I sat down with him to dive into his roots, the adrenaline-fueled world of aerial firefighting, and the unique challenges of flying a DC-10 over raging wildfires.
His account, rich with technical detail and personal anecdotes, paints a vivid picture of life on the fire line. This is his story.
Smithley’s Background and His Journey into Fire Aviation
Captain RK Smithley in command of his DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Can you tell us about your background and where you’re from?
RK: I’m from Ligonier, a little place 50 miles east of Pittsburgh, out in Pennsylvania’s Laurel Mountains. It’s a small town, the kind where everybody knows your name. I don’t live in Albuquerque full-time; 10 Tanker flies its crews from their homes to wherever the airplanes are. I’d say half our guys live in the East, half in the West.
I live near Bristol, Tennessee now, moved there about a year ago from the Atlanta area. I worked for World Airways out of Peachtree City, Georgia, for many years. So I’m kind of a Delta snob—million-miler status, partly thanks to World Airways and partly 10 Tanker. We live wherever we want, and when it’s time to work, we book our own commercial flights, hotels, and rental cars. No travel department here; we do it all ourselves.
AvGeekery: Can you walk us through your aviation journey and how you ended up at 10 Tanker?
RK: I’m an Embry-Riddle grad, Class of ’83, Aeronautical Science. Started at World Airways in ’89 and worked there for 25 years. World was the primary carrier for military troop and cargo movements. It operated a fleet of DC-10s, MD-11s, and 747s. I started out in the DC-10, flew it for ten years, and then flew the MD-11 for 15 years. Never got to the 747.
I think we had four DC-10s when I joined World. I came off the 10 in 1999, but we operated them for another 5-7 years. We had also taken on new MD-11s from Douglas, sometime around ‘92 or ‘93. So we ended up with about 15 MD-11s and four 747s. The 747s were all freight. The MD-11s were both passenger and cargo. The DC-10s were combi DC-10-30s. Believe it or not, at various points in the year, we’d convert them from passengers to cargo and cargo to passengers. I was all set to upgrade to the 747 once World got a fifth one, but it ended up getting canceled, so I stayed on the MD-11.
When World folded in 2014, I became chief pilot for a corporate 135 operation in Kennesaw, Georgia. They hired me to take them to 121. It was fine, the commute was great –30 minutes– but I wasn’t happy. Too much work, not enough joy.
Then, buddies of mine from World who’d joined 10 Tanker told me about bombing fires from 250 feet at 170 miles an hour in a DC-10. I thought, “You’re kidding.” My replacement as chief pilot at World was already here, and he sold me on it. Eleven years ago, I joined 10 Tanker, and I haven’t looked back.
A Day in the Life of a DC-10 Aerial Firefighting Captain
IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Take me through the process of being called up for duty. How does that work?
RK: If it’s outside of a normal shift, we will get the call and deploy. Again, we don’t have a travel department, so we make all the arrangements, from booking flights to accommodations and rental cars.
AvGeekery: So right now, you’re at a hotel in Albuquerque, which is where 10 Tanker is based. Tell me what a typical day looks like for you.
RK: We basically show up at a tanker base at whatever time they want us there—typically 0900, but if we’re working an active fire, it could be 0800 or even 0700 for what’s called a campaign fire, those massive blazes that cover thousands and thousands of acres and burn for days on end. The planning starts with a base briefing within the first hour of duty. They’ll cover what’s happening in the fire world, what they’re anticipating for the day, and where the different assets are located—other tankers, leadplanes that guide our drops, and air attack platforms, which are like forward air controllers orbiting overhead, managing the airspace above the fire.
Our four DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft at 10 Tanker are spread out across the West. Right now, for example, there’s one in Pocatello, Idaho, another in Moses Lake, Washington, a third in Santa Maria, California, and mine’s here in Albuquerque. We stay connected with the other crews, chatting via text to give each other a heads-up on what we’re seeing out there. When we’re ordered to a fire, we send emails to all flight crew members and management, detailing where we’re going, where we’re at, and where we’re expected to reload with more retardant. There’s a lot of communication going on—it’s critical to keep everyone in the loop.
A dispatch order for a new fire | IMAGE: RK Smithley
While we wait for the call, the airplane sits ready, and so does the flight crew—captain, copilot, and flight engineer. When the phone rings, the base hands me, as the captain, a piece of paper—the dispatch order.
It’s got everything we need: latitude and longitude coordinates, a descriptive location of the fire, and sometimes hazards like wires, cell towers, or windmills. It’ll note if structures are threatened or specifics about the terrain, like when we were working the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, New Mexico, which was technically just across the border in Arizona, on Navajo Indian land. That detail’s included, though it doesn’t change our approach.
The order also has contact information and, most importantly, our operating radio frequencies. It lists who’s been ordered to the fire—other tankers, leadplanes, air attack—though it’s not always a complete list, so we’ll ask if we need to confirm who’s out there.
Once we get that paper, we head to the airplane and plug the coordinates into the navigation systems, which take nine minutes to spool up and come online. Meanwhile, the ground crew is loading 9,400 gallons of red retardant into the three external tanks on the belly of the DC-10—what we call the “canoe.” That process takes 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the base’s setup.
About 20 minutes after getting the order, we’re starting engines and heading to the fire. From Albuquerque, we could be dispatched anywhere. The other day, we were working Oak Ridge near Gallup, got back to base, and thunderstorms rolled in, parking us for a bit. When a weather corridor opened, we were ready to go back, but the base called on the radio: “Hey, we’ve got a divert for you.” They sent a new order, redirecting us to a fire just south of Prescott, Arizona—a 50-minute flight one way.
Another example: we recently started a shift in Mesa, Arizona, working a fire near St. George, Utah, reloading at Mesa Gateway. On the second run, they asked, “Do you have fuel to get to Pocatello?”
I said, “Yeah, why?” They told us to recover there—they were done with us for the day.
Flexibility is everything.
RK Smithley
I think they were spreading out the assets since two DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft were already at Mesa, and they wanted one in the Great Basin area. So, we spent one night in Pocatello before relocating to Albuquerque for the Oak Ridge fire. You never know where you’ll end up at the start of the day, so we always carry our bags with us. We might not check out of the hotel, but the room’s empty, and our stuff’s on the airplane in case we’re relocated.
That’s the reality of this job—flexibility is everything.
AvGeekery: You said when you get dispatched, you get a list of all confirmed assets heading to the fire. What exactly do you look for?
Tanker 10 DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with other firefighting assets including MD-87 and RJ85s | IMAGE: Tanker 10
RK: Most critically, we cannot drop without a leadplane, as DC-10s are not initial attack qualified—unlike lighter tankers such as MD-87s, C-130s, BA-146s, and RJ85s, which can drop with only air attack oversight. We’re actively working to change that, though. We conducted extensive training during the offseason to prepare for initial attack certification for the DC-10.
For now, we rely on leadplanes, but initial attack air tankers can operate with just an air attack platform providing aerial supervision, communicating directly with air attack about their objectives. Meanwhile, air attack coordinates with the incident commander on the ground—if there is one. On new fires, ground crews often haven’t arrived yet, so there’s no one to coordinate with on the ground.
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with an OV-10 Bronco leadplane | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The air attack platform, typically a Rockwell 690, orbits above the stack, though some operators have begun using Pilatus PC-12s or even Citations. They manage the temporary flight restriction (TFR) area, overseeing the entire operation. The United States Forest Service (USFS) uses KingAir 250 GTs for leadplanes, and CAL FIRE uses the OV-10 Bronco for both lead and air attack.
If neither the air attack nor the leadplane is airborne, we don’t launch. We coordinate with the base to ensure the lead is in the air, giving them a 10-minute head start to the fire. Even if they’re on the ground and say they’re preparing to take off, we wait until they’re airborne—mechanical issues could delay them, and we don’t want to arrive first and waste fuel circling. Our DC-10 external tank system is not certified to land loaded, unlike many other tankers.
If we can’t drop, we’d have to jettison the retardant safely—but only if there’s no lead at the fire and no other nearby fires with a leadplane we could divert to. So once we’re airborne, we need complete assurance that we can reach the fire and make the drop.
That’s why it’s crucial to see those assets listed on the dispatch sheet. If they aren’t, we always confirm the Lead is en route to the fire and where they are coming from, so we can coordinate our arrival time. It helps to know if there’ll be four other tankers and a bunch of S2s, especially when working with CAL FIRE in California. If it’s going to be a busy fire with a lot of aircraft—a real gaggle—you might add extra fuel because you’ll likely be holding for a while before your turn to drop.
Go-Time: Flying the Mission
RK Smithley (right) with copilot and flight engineer aboard a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft | IMAGE: RK Smithley
AvGeekery: Who’s on board the aircraft with you on a mission?
RK: Our missions require a captain, a copilot, and a flight engineer. These are not MD-10s. These are true DC-10s with a flight engineer.
AvGeekery: You’ve got your orders, you have the asset sheet, you know where you’re going. Now it’s go-time. What’s it like flying a mission? Can you share some of the details and what goes into making a drop happen?
A DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft comes in for the drop behind a King Air leadplane | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: We enter the temporary flight restriction (TFR) area—picture a red circle on a map, like at a NASCAR race—at 170 knots, configured and slowed down. DC-10s aren’t initial attack qualified, unlike lighter tankers such as MD-87s or C-130s, so we rely on a leadplane to guide our drops.
At 12 miles out, we call: “Lead 7-5, Tanker 910, 12 east.” The lead assigns us an altitude, altimeter setting, and our position in the stack—maybe we’re first, maybe fifth. On busy fires, we might hold at an Initial Point (IP), 10 to 20 miles from the fire, named something like “Station IP” at 7,000 feet. We circle in left turns, listening to other aircraft on the radio, though heavy smoke can obscure them, so we lean on radio chatter for situational awareness.
We monitor FM air-to-ground radios 50 to 60 miles out to gauge the fire’s pace, picking up altitudes and altimeter settings, allowing us to descend to the entry altitude before arriving.
Air attack platforms—Rockwell 690s, Pilatus PC-12s, or sometimes Citations—orbit above in right turns, acting as forward controllers, while we maintain left turns unless cleared for a right turn due to the drop path. They coordinate with ground incident commanders, who rarely speak to us directly; instructions flow from the ground to air attack, then to the leadplane, and finally to us.
It’s a tightly choreographed process. For campaign fires—massive blazes spanning thousands of acres over days—an IP is usually established. For new fires, there might not be one, so we hold wherever directed until the lead is ready.
Yankin' and Bankin': A DC-10 Aerial Firefighting Captain's Life on the Fire Line 86
Once cleared, the leadplane guides us, detailing the drop zone and hazards like power lines, helicopter dip sites, or cell towers. While we operate at different altitudes than helicopters or smaller tankers like S2s or RJ-85s, our DC-10’s wake is significant, so there’s a three-minute rule post-drop to let it dissipate, similar to the five-mile spacing at major airports like Hartsfield for heavy in-trail spacing. The lead may perform a “show me” run, flying low to mark the start and stop points, about a thousand feet below us.
On the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, we were V-ing off structures for protection—laying a retardant line one way, circling back, and angling another to form a protective V. I’ve made five or six runs from a single 9,400-gallon load, boxing in assets like a cell tower or the Wilson Observatory above Ontario [California]. They’ll say, “Start here, stop at that two-track road,” and our system allows precise “start-stop” drops.
The retardant is red so we can see previous drops, letting us “tag” the end of another tanker’s line and extend it—straight or angled—to build walls around the fire. We’re not extinguishing; we’re slowing the fire to give ground firefighters, who have the toughest job, a chance to control and extinguish it.
IMAGE: 10 Tanker
We might drop in the same area as the prior tanker or on the opposite side if their objective is complete. We think in terms of the fire’s head, flanks, and heel for situational awareness. My critical task is maintaining a consistent altitude—say, 250 feet—at 147 knots with a 60,000-pound fuel load for range (one hour out, one back, one reserve). With 85,000 pounds of retardant exiting in as little as five seconds, it takes constant elevator inputs and stabilizer trim to hold that altitude. A climb from 250 to 500 feet makes the line wispy, and the lead or air attack will call it out: “What the heck happened to that?”
Coverage levels are tailored to terrain. On Oak Ridge, in Gallup’s high desert, we used a lighter setting for grass—around 700 gallons a second, coverage level three or four—versus 950 gallons a second for heavy timber at level six or eight, which shortens the line but ensures thicker coating.
We coordinate with the lead during their “show me” run: “At coverage level eight, we won’t reach that road. Want a six?”
They might respond, “Yeah, six gives us 11 seconds to hit that point,” or stick with eight and let the next tanker extend.
It’s a blend of science, tactics, and constant communication to deliver that retardant exactly where it’s needed, every time.
AvGeekery: What’s the process of preparing and loading the fire retardant slurry onto the aircraft?
Loading the slurry onto the DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: When we get a dispatch order, the first thing we do is check the fuel load and the fire’s location to plan our approach. The DC-10’s got some unique constraints that drive our decisions.
For instance, it’s not certified to land with a load of retardant, and believe it or not, it’s also not certified to pressurize with a load onboard.
So, we’re flying to the fire unpressurized, which limits our altitude. We typically operate in the 11,000 to 13,000-foot range if we need to clear mountains, using supplemental oxygen. Since we don’t use full-face masks, we’re limited to a maximum altitude of 18,000 feet with that setup. The DC-10 can’t pressurize until the load is gone. It just wasn’t certified to do that. Once it’s gone, you can go to FL280.
We also have a limitation where we can’t certify RVSM [Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum], which caps us at 28,000 feet even after dropping, though we can climb that high on the way home if needed.
For a long dispatch—say, a 500-mile trip—it sometimes makes more sense to fly high and fast, empty, to save fuel, then land at a base closer to the fire, refuel, and load the retardant there. That’s happened three times in the last week across our fleet.
When we decide to load at a base, we confirm the fuel load—typically 60,000 pounds for a one-hour outbound leg, one-hour return, and an hour’s reserve—and ensure it’s good for the mission. Once I, as the captain, give the go-ahead with “Yeah, you’re clear to load,” the ground crew gets to work. They plug three-inch lines into each of the three separate tanks on the bottom of the airplane—what we call the “canoe” hanging off the belly.
Each tank on the DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft can hold 9,400 gallons of retardant. | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Those tanks hold 9,400 gallons of retardant, and loading usually takes 15 to 20 minutes, depending on the base. As soon as it’s done, we’re off and running, ready to head to the fire with a full load, unpressurized, and prepped for the drop. It’s a streamlined process, but every decision—fuel, altitude, load—ties into the mission’s demands and the airplane’s unique setup.
Tanker 10 team posing in front of the “canoe.” IMAGE: Tanker 10
The Rules and Regulations of Fire Aviation
AvGeekery: So you’re on a six-day-on, one-day-off schedule. What does a typical shift look like for you and your airplane?
RK: My shift is 11 days, then a week off, then another 11. We’re training a new captain now to get us to two captains per airplane, with the hopes of achieving a two-week on, two off schedule. He’s a fire veteran, so we just need to teach him the DC-10. The airplane works six days, then gets a maintenance day for TLC. This includes tire and brake changes, MEL items, or planned inspections. The mechanics work really hard, and sometimes really late, to keep us flying, especially during busy seasons with seven-day coverage.
AvGeekery: How many drops can you make in a day, and are there FAA time regulations to which you must adhere?
RK: We’re governed by duty time and flight time limits, kind of like 121 operations in commercial aviation, but tailored to our unique mission. The maximum is a 14-hour duty day, and sometimes we push right up to that limit. If we start at seven or eight in the morning and go until dark, we’re hitting that 14-hour mark.
The rule is we have to complete our drops by sunset plus 30 minutes, but we can fly back in complete darkness to get back to base within the flight and duty time rules. That’s how we end up with some late nights.
Within a 24-hour period, we’re capped at eight hours of flight time. For the week, it’s a maximum of 36 flight hours over six days, and we sometimes get close to that or even encroach on it. If we exceed those limits, there are compensatory measures—like extra rest—but that gets into details that are a bit too complex. Essentially, we stick to 36 hours in six days as our hard limit.
A DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker drops a load | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
As for drops, the record for a DC-10 in a single day is 12, and let me tell you, that’s pushing it. It’s like Southwest turning 737s—fast, efficient, and a little mind-blowing for an airplane this size. It’s almost like a NASCAR pit stop in slow motion, with a ton going on.
We’re loading 9,400 gallons of retardant, fueling up, and the mechanics are doing the walk-around for us since we don’t bring steps to the airplane every run. They’re on the interphone, communicating the whole time, checking the aircraft so we don’t have to climb out of the cockpit.
The most I’ve personally done is nine or ten drops in a day, and that’s only possible when the fire is close, like 30 minutes or 30 miles away, say, the Cajon Pass fire, just 18 miles from our San Bernardino base. You’re back and forth, reloading nonstop, and those are rough days for the whole crew, mechanics included. Nobody gets a break.
Flying unpressurized adds to the challenge. The airplane’s air-conditioned, but when it’s 100 degrees on the ground, it gets hot, and that takes a toll. Combine that with the intensity and adrenaline of constant fire drops—flying low at 250 feet, 147 knots, banking hard—it’s exhausting.
Avgeekery: And no flight attendants to bring you drinks or snacks, either!
The gutted interior of a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: (laughing) Nope! But the bases do a great job of keeping us fed. We’ve got a cooler onboard with water, drinks, and snacks. They’ll toss lunches into a five-gallon Home Depot bucket, which we drop out the door and reel back up. Believe it or not, we’ve got a picnic table strapped down on the main deck, which is basically the same as a gutted UPS or FedEx freighter without the roller mats, where we can sit for a few minutes, eat, and stretch our legs away from the cockpit. Those brief moments help, but on a 12-drop day, it’s relentless. You’re running on fumes by the end, but it’s what we do to get the job done.
After an exhausting but successful day, the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft get ready to sleep for the night | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The DC-10: An Old Gal, but a Nimble Beast
Tanker 910 of the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: Does the plane handle differently when loaded versus empty when you’re flying back at FL280?
RK: Oh yeah, you definitely feel the difference, and it’s a big one. When we’re loaded with 9,400 gallons of retardant, we’re at 420,000 pounds, which is still 160,000 pounds under the max gross weight of 572,000 I flew in the DC-10-30s at World Airways. That gives us an incredible power-to-weight ratio—better than most air tankers out there, maybe except the Dash 8Q-400. All that thrust makes the DC-10 feel alive, like you’ve got power to spare. Power is life, you know.
But to your point about altitude, we don’t often fly high. For instance, after a drop on the Arizona fire, we came back at 17,500 feet VFR, heading northeast. We rarely get into the flight levels because it takes a lot of fuel to climb up there, and we have to weigh that against the winds and the length of the flight.
If it’s a long haul, sure, going higher might give us a smoother ride and better fuel efficiency, but New Mexico and Arizona right now? It’s constant low-level turbulence from the heat, and we’re dodging virga all the time. On the Oak Ridge fire near Gallup, we got beat up pretty good by the rough air. One time, we parked the airplane when the weather was closing in, and me and the trainee were like, “We’re done.” Good call, too—winds were gusting to 58 knots not long after. It got strange out there.
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft completes a drop | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
The biggest difference in handling comes during the mission itself. The DC-10 is an amazingly nimble airplane for its size, thanks to the leading edge slats—Douglas calls them slats, Boeing would call them leading edge flaps—and spoilers that help us roll.
I’ve never flown a fighter, but some of the videos you’ll see of us, we’re horsing this thing around like a big fighter jet. Picture coming down the side of a mountain in a turning drop, on the tip of the spear, trying to lay retardant exactly where the ground crews need it. We’re not doing it for show, but sometimes the terrain demands it. You’re yanking and banking hard, evaluating escape routes—what if an engine quits?—because a go-around is always an option.
There are places we can’t get into, where single-engine tankers or helicopters shine, but we can handle most anything else. We’re the biggest tool in the toolbox, delivering 9,400 gallons compared to a large air tanker’s 3,000. The air attack and leadplanes decide when to call in the VLAT, and we make it count.
On the way back, empty, the plane feels lighter and more responsive, but we don’t vary speed much—145 to 149 knots, usually 147, with a typical fuel load of 60,000 pounds for range: one hour out, one hour back, and an hour reserve to divert somewhere like Roswell if Albuquerque’s weathered out. For the Arizona run, we added 8,000 pounds of fuel for comfort with storms around. The lighter weight makes the plane more agile, but we’re still dodging turbulence and managing the mission’s demands. It’s a different beast empty, but the DC-10’s power and agility make it a joy to fly, loaded or not.
Face sheet for the DC-10 aerial firefighting fleet at 10 Tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: With DC-10s fading from commercial use, is it hard to get parts for the 10 Tanker fleet?
Spare engines for the 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
RK: Yes and no—it’s a mixed bag. The good news is that the Air Force’s decision to park their KC-10 fleet, which included 59 DC-10s, has been a real boon for us at 10 Tanker. They’re starting to release parts from those airframes, and we’ve already bought engines from them.
I’ve got a couple of buddies out at Travis Air Force Base in Sacramento who’ve been involved with the KC-10s, and they’ve confirmed the parts are becoming available. FedEx’s DC-10 and MD-10 fleet is another resource we tap into. In fact, 10 Tanker is likely going to buy some KC-10s outright just for parts.
I’ve heard the Air Force is keeping around 20 KC-10s in operational ready reserve, though I’m not certain of the exact number. That still leaves over 30 airframes available for us to pull structural parts from, which has made components more plentiful than they used to be.
The cool thing about our fleet at 10 Tanker is that we’re flying some of the last DC-10s ever built. Three of our four airplanes are 1987 and 1988 models, originally flown by Thai Airways, Japan Air System, and Northwest. The foundations of 10 Tanker were rooted with Omni International, principal owners out of Tulsa, who parked their DC-10s years ago. Those ended up becoming our tankers.
Our oldest bird, a 1975 model, is what we call our antique—an ex-Continental ship that started with Finnair—but it still flies and runs like a champ. These airframes are relatively low-time, especially compared to my days at World Airways, where we’d log 250 hours a month. At 10 Tanker, we’re only flying 250 to 400 hours a year, though it’s intense, rigorous flying—low-level drops at 250 feet, yanking and banking hard over fires. That kind of work demands thorough maintenance, and our off-season inspections are no joke.
Tanker 912 undergoing a C Check | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Our mechanics…I can’t say enough about them. They’re the unsung heroes keeping these planes airworthy. When our fire season wraps up in November, they dive into heavy checks at bases like San Bernardino or sometimes Albuquerque.
This past winter, Tanker 911 was in Oscoda, Michigan, at Kalitta for a C-check. Those guys work year-round, not just keeping the airplanes rolling during the season but doing deep maintenance to prep for the next year. For example, we got recalled to California in January—an extremely rare event—but our team was ready because of their meticulous off-season work.
The airframe I’m flying now has about 70,000 hours, which, in the grand scheme, isn’t bad for a DC-10. With the parts supply from the KC-10s and our maintenance program, we’re good to go for a while longer, keeping these old birds fighting fires with the best of them.
The 2025 Los Angeles Fires
10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft dropped more than 450,000 gallons of retardant on the 2025 LA Fires. Fire retardant, also known as Phos-Chek, is made up of 85% water, 10% salts, and 5% minor ingredients that make up the color to allow the containment lines to be seen from the air. It does not put out the fire, but decreases the intensity of the flames to help all of the hardworking ground crews. | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery: Can you tell us about that January call-up to the devastating Los Angeles fires? How does that process unfold when you get that unexpected call?
RK: You’re at home, maybe visiting family or just kicking back after New Year’s, doing whatever. Chief pilot sends out an email blast to all the crews: “Hey, we got a new fire in L.A. or SoCal. We may need to send one, two, or three airplanes—whatever we can manage.”
In January, it’s rare—only the second time in 10 Tanker’s history we’ve flown in the U.S. that month, the last being around 2013 before I joined. This time, we could only send two DC-10s because the other two were in heavy maintenance. One was completely torn apart in Oscoda, Michigan, and the other in San Bernardino was too deep into its checks to fly. But we had two birds in Victorville, just coincidentally there for tank calibrations, so they were ready to go.
You start mentally preparing to head to Ontario to pick up an airplane.
Then the phone rings, and Chief Pilot’s on the line: “Hey, can you go to Ontario and get Tanker 914 in Victorville? Get a crew together.” He’ll say, “I’ve got B and C lined up for copilot and flight engineer. You’re A, the captain. Coordinate with those two and let me know how soon you can get there.”
That’s how it goes—you drop everything, pack a bag, and start heading west. For me, it was a bit of a push. When the Chief Pilot first called, I was like, “Eh, it’s just after New Year’s. I don’t want to go to work.” But he said, “We may need two airplanes.” I told him, “If you get the second airplane, I’ll go.” Sure enough, they needed the second one, so I went. Chief Pilot himself took the first airplane, and I led the second.
10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft at the 2025 LA fires | IMAGE: New York Times
It’s a scramble, but it’s what we do—roll with the punches to move an airplane and help people who need it, saving lives and property.
That SoCal mission was memorable, not just because it was January, but because of the impact. Those fires were small by our standards, about 12,000 acres compared to the 400,000-acre monsters I’ve worked. But they burned through 12,000 homes between the Palisades and the Eaton fires.
In our world, we get called for fires as small as a couple thousand acres, so 12,000 isn’t huge, but 12,000 homes? That’s massive. Flying over those black foundations, holding over what used to be people’s homes and, in some respects, their lives torn apart—it tears at you. It was one of the most poignant missions I’ve flown, not just for the urban devastation but because it was such an unusual event for us to be out there in January, something we’d only done once before in company history.
Chilean firefighters wave at a passing 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft in 2023 | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
A 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft drops water on a Chilean wildfire in 2023 | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
This kind of rapid response isn’t new for us. We’ve got an international presence, too. For years, I flew to Australia during their summer—our winter—for six years straight when I was new. We’ve done Chile in January or February, like two years ago, and Mexico, flying out of Laredo, Texas, into the Sierra Madre Mountains south of Monterey, the year before that. Those international call-ups work much the same: you get the word, you pack, you go. But that SoCal call in January? It stood out for its rarity and the emotional weight of seeing so many homes lost. It’s a reminder of why we do this—helping people when they need it most.
So You Want to be an Aerial Firefighter
AvGeekery: How does someone get into aerial firefighting? What’s the journey like for someone looking to join an outfit like 10 Tanker?
RK: Aerial firefighting is a tight-knit world, a club—way smaller than World Airways, where we had 500 pilots and crew. Here at 10 Tanker, we’ve got just 25 crew members, and across the whole country, there are only 35 big air tankers—BA-146s, C-130s, 737s, and our DC-10s–between the four different contract air tanker companies. That’s not counting the smaller S2s and C-130s used by CAL FIRE.
It’s an exclusive group, and you almost have to know somebody to get your foot in the door. That’s how I got in. I knew two guys from World Airways who’d jumped to 10 Tanker, and with my 3,300 hours of DC-10 time, it was a natural fit. They could teach me fire tactics, but I already knew the airplane. It’s tough to teach both fire and the aircraft from scratch, so you need one piece to start—either heavy jet experience or fire knowledge.
A McDonnell Douglas DC-10 Simulator | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
Take our new hire this year, for example. He flew Single Engine Airtankers, or SEATs, so he knows fire inside and out–tactics, lingo, procedures. He also flew a corporate 737, so he’s got jet time. We just have to teach him the DC-10.
On the flip side, when I joined, I was the opposite: a DC-10 guy with zero clue about aerial firefighting. I’d been a volunteer ground firefighter at 16 in Pennsylvania, but aerial tactics? No idea. It’s extensive—there’s so much to think about.
After your first year, you go to a school called NAFA—National Aerial Firefighting Academy. It’s a three-level course where you learn the tactics and lingo, and it really opens your eyes. From there, you can start working toward the left seat as a captain.
The yoke of a DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft with 10 Tanker | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
I made captain in my second year because they needed me to, with my 3,300 hours in the DC-10, but it took time to learn fire. Even now, 11 years in, I’ll hear something from a colleague and think, “Oh, I didn’t know that.” You’re always learning, just like in 121 operations.
If you’re coming in fresh, one path is flying air attack platforms, like a Rockwell 690, orbiting above the fire in holding patterns all day. Your right-seater, an aerial fire supervisor, doesn’t need to be a pilot but handles comms with incident planners on the ground. That’s a great way to learn fire operations and build experience.
Another route is crop dusting—guys come out of Air Tractor AT-802s, either learning fire through that or bringing some fire knowledge and learning the airplane. You’ve got to have one of those pieces—fire experience or heavy jet time—and knowing someone in the business is almost a must. It’s no secret, no discrimination; it’s just the reality of a small field.
Crowds line up to tour a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting plane at an airshow | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
A couple of weeks ago, at an airshow here in Albuquerque, I was doing tours of our aircraft when a guy flying 737s for a major airline came up to me. He thought aerial firefighting sounded incredible. And it is, but you’ve got to have a screw loose to choose this over the airlines, where you can make a lot more money flying point A to point B, like driving a bus with wings. We’re not getting rich, but we’re well taken care of.
The real payoff is when you see a row of houses you saved—that’s a level of accomplishment you can’t get flying passengers. It gets in your blood, just like ground firefighting did for me as a second-generation volunteer firefighter in Pennsylvania. I did that for 16 years, and now I’ve come full circle with aerial firefighting. Aviation’s in my blood, too, so combining the two? My blood’s pretty rich.
Our youngest captain is 27, and I’m thinking, “Why isn’t he at Delta, American, or Southwest?” He might go there someday, but he came from flying air attack and decided he wanted to fly a tanker. He’s getting it done. How long will he stay? Who knows—maybe he’ll retire at 60 or 65. We don’t have an age limit; one of our lead pilots is 70.
Underbelly of a 10 Tanker DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
You can fly till you drop if you want, but I’ll tell you, this isn’t a game for old guys. I’m an old guy myself, and it wears on you. Eight legs a day, and you’re so beat you can barely eat at the hotel before crashing, hoping for a shower and some sleep before another eight-legged tour tomorrow.
Younger guys handle it better, but we old-timers still do it well. It’s a lot of work, and there’s a lot of boredom too—sitting at the base for days, especially early in the season, screwing around on Facebook, reading books, or shopping on Amazon. Then the phone rings, and your hair’s on fire. You’re moving to the airplane, and by the end of the day, you might be five states north.
It’s a different lifestyle—no epaulettes, no black plain-toed shoes, no herding flight attendants. I wear a 10 Tanker shirt, shorts, tennis shoes, and a Nomex flight suit, growing whatever facial hair I feel like. It’s freeing, but man, it’s intense. Once firefighting and aviation get in your system, you don’t want to leave. It’s a calling, and for those who want in, it’s about finding that one piece—jet time or fire knowledge—and making the right connections to break into this small, incredible world.
AvGeekery: RK, it has been an absolute pleasure speaking with you today. I learned so much, and I’m sure our readers will, too. Any final thoughts or memorable moments you’d like to share?
RK: My favorite hat says “Yankin’ and Bankin’”—a phrase I dropped during a TV interview a few years back at a Salt Lake hotel, and some folks liked it so much they made hats for it. That’s pretty much what we do in these DC-10s—yank and bank, horsing these big birds around like fighters to get the retardant where it needs to go. We’re incredibly proud at 10 Tanker to be the largest tool in the Forest Service’s arsenal, carrying 9,400 gallons per drop.
There’s a place for every tanker out there—single-engine air tractors, helicopters, lighter tankers like the MD-87s or C-130s—but when they call us, we’re all in, no matter what. Doesn’t matter if we’re in New Mexico, California, or halfway across the globe in Australia or Chile. We’re dedicated to the job, giving it everything we’ve got.
What drives us is supporting the ground firefighters. Those guys and gals have the toughest, most important job of all, battling the flames up close. Our role is to help them get a handle on the fire, building those red retardant walls to slow it down and protect lives and property. That’s what it’s all about. This work gets in your blood, just like ground firefighting did when I was a volunteer in Pennsylvania.
I wouldn’t trade this work for anything—it’s a calling, and I’m proud to be part of it.
The 10 Tanker team in front of a DC-10 aerial firefighting aircraft from the 10 Tanker fleet | IMAGE: 10 Tanker
AvGeekery extends heartfelt thanks to Captain RK Smithley and the entire 10 Tanker Air Carrier team for granting us this insightful interview. We deeply appreciate your unwavering dedication and service to protecting lives and property across the nation.
To learn more about 10 Tanker, visit their website at 10tanker.com.
With its distinctive ring around its fuselage, the Wellington DWI (Directional Wireless Installation) aircraft was effective against Germany’s magnetic mines during World War II. Following British successes in defending against mines with the technology, the Germans installed similar systems on their aircraft.
The Wellington DWI with its Distinctive Ring Which Detonated German magnetic Mines. | Image: WorldsWarPhotos.info
Allied Shipping Faced Dangers From German Magnetic Mines
The unique Wellington DWI modified bomber aircraft was designed to combat German magnetic mines during the Second World War. In the early days of the war, Luftwaffe aircraft were dropping mines in British coastal waters, presenting a severe hazard to Allied shipping.
Aluminum Ring Powered by Automobile Engine
British engineers devised a solution to install an aluminum ring on the Wellington. They also added a Ford V8 automobile engine in the fuselage to create and send an electric current to the ring, which would generate a magnetic field. This ring, a circular coil 51 feet in diameter, was inside a balsa wood covering.
Wellington DWI in Flight: Image: historyofwar.org
The basic mission was for the Wellington DWI to fly low over water, and the magnetic field in the ring would trigger German magnetic mines and make them detonate. They conducted successful tests of the system in December 1939. The first successful mission with a DWI Aircraft occurred on 8 January 1940 near Manston, a town near the English Channel coast.
Challenges Faced by Wellington DWI Crews
The ring system presented some unique challenges for flight crews. First, the aircraft had to fly very low and were in danger from the exploding magnetic mines. Crew determined that they could fly no lower than 35 feet above the water, and the RAF set a standard altitude of 60 feet. Despite this, the explosions still rattled the aircraft quite a bit.
During a test flight on 13 January 1940, the Wellington DWI accidentally dropped below 35 feet, and when the mine exploded, the crew stated the aircraft was “thrown” up in the air.
Engine Fumes Made Conditions Difficult For Flight Crews
A second variant of the DWI had a De Havilland Gypsy Six engine, which produced a more powerful current. The Gypsy version was called the Mark II. Both this and the V8 produced fumes inside the aircraft, often causing “violent nausea” among the crew.
Wellington DWI Aircraft on the Ground Near Ismalia, Egypt. | Image: historyofwar.org
Altogether, the British converted as many as 15 Wellingtons to the DWI models with the rings. The basic mission outline was a formation of three DWIs.
On 11 May 1940, DWIs participated in a mission to evacuate Dutch Queen Wilhelmina and members of her family and her government from the Netherlands during the German invasion. They escaped on a British destroyer, and DWIs helped clear mines so the ship could escape.
Wellington DWI Aircraft Provide Valuable Support For Allied Armies
Following this, the DWIs deployed to Ismalia, Egypt, and flew missions over Alexandria Harbor, the Suez Canal, and the African coast. Their ability to clear mines proved to be essential support for the Allied armies advancing in Northern Africa.
German Develop their Own Anti-Mine Ring Systems
The Wellington DWI proved so effective that the Germans developed similar designs to combat British magnetic mining of the Baltic and North Seas. In 1939, the Luftwaffe modified a Junker Ju-52/3m transport aircraft with a 46-foot diameter ring. Like the Wellington, the ring on the Ju-52/3m, which the Germans called the “MS Minensuche(mine search)” aircraft, was an aluminum coil encased in balsa wood.
They attached the ring to the wings with plywood struts. The German aircraft used diesel and gasoline motors mounted in the fuselage to power 150-kilowatt generators to provide electricity to their rings.
Acoustic Mines Create More Challenges for Germans
When the British also began using acoustic mines, the Germans responded by adding new devices to their Junkers. These “KK-Gerät (Knallkörpergerät, or mine destruction devices)” aircraft carried 30 22-pound explosive charges, which would destroy the hydrophones (microphones)on the mines.
During their missions, two MS Minensuchemine search planes would fly next to each other at 32 – 65 feet, and the KK-Gerät aircraft would fly about 130 feet behind them. This put them in danger from explosions caused by the first planes.
The Germans eventually deployed these aircraft as far south as the Mediterranean, with their most critical and dangerous area along the French coast. The aircraft conducted mine sweeping operations until the end of the war.
These high-tech (for their time) developments by both sides to combat magnetic mines during World War II were examples of what Winston Churchill called the “Battle of the Boffins,” the continuous scientific battle to develop the most advanced weapons and tactics in the early days of the war.
On 12 August 2025, the HB-SXA aircraft flew to an altitude of 31,288 feet, setting a world record for the highest flight ever by a solar-powered plane. The aircraft, built by Swiss company SolarStratos, will have two future missions: to demonstrate the capability of solar power for aircraft and to study and operate in the upper atmosphere. Another company, Solar Flight, based in California, is also working on several designs for solar-powered planes.
“Up there, facing the sun that powers our wings, flying without burning a single drop of fuel is an indescribable feeling…a moment out of time,” said the HB-SXA pilot Raphaël Domjan of Switzerland.
HB-SXA Solar-Powered Plane Climbs to a Record 31,288 Feet
On 12 August, the HB-SXA solar-powered plane took off from Sion Airport in Switzerland. During the 5-hour flight, Raphaël Domjan took it up to 31,288 feet over Switzerland’s Valais Alps. The aircraft relied on solar energy and thermal updrafts to ascend. A 50-kilowatt electric motor running at 2,200 RPMs powers the plane, and it produces no pollution. Its forward-mounted propeller has three blades and a 6.23-foot diameter.
Closeup of the cockpit of the HB-SXA solar-powered plane. | Image: SolarStratos
It also has an 81.36-foot wingspan. The HB-SXA has a 236.8-square-foot field of solar cells covering the wings. These cells provide energy to lithium-ion batteries. The plane’s fuselage and wings are made from carbon fiber, which gives them a combination of light weight and strength.
Challenges and Advantages of Solar-Powered Planes
The development of solar-powered planes presents some unique challenges for designers. NASA and various subcontractors have been working on solar-powered aircraft since the 1980s. These include the Pathfinder, Centurion, and Helios. Some of them have wingspans as wide as 737 jets.
Tony Tao, a PhD student at MIT, said an important challenge is that the sun and airborne planes are both moving, which constantly changes the angle at which the sun strikes the solar panels. The result is that they do not capture as much energy as a solar panel on a stationary object like a roof.
Diagram showing relative dimensions of the HB-SXA compared to an A320. | Image: SolarStratos
Tao added that the relationship between a solar-powered plane’s speed and the power it needs to move the plane forward means that the panels only capture about ten to twenty percent of the energy from the sun. More simply, this results in a maximum speed of only about 50 miles per hour.
Another design difficulty in solar-powered planes is that they generally have long, thin wings and delicate solar panels. This makes them vulnerable during bad weather.
An advantage of solar-powered planes is that they do not need to carry fuel or rely on engines that combust oxygen. This allows them to fly at higher altitudes than most types of aircraft. Tao added that these planes are probably better suited for missions like loitering over areas for data collection and surveillance instead of carrying cargo or large numbers of passengers.
Sunseeker Duo Has Tandem Seats in Cockpit
The Solar Flight company in California is working on two unique designs of solar-powered planes. One, the Sunseeker Duo, is one of the only solar aircraft with two seats. The seats are next to each other in the cockpit. Its wingspan is 72 feet, and it has an empty weight of 617 pounds.
The Solar Flight Sunseeker Duo flying over a glacier. | Image: Solar Flight
It also has 1510 solar cells on its wings and tail surfaces. The cells power a battery pack in the fuselage that provides electricity to a 15-kilowatt motor mounted on the front of the vertical stabilizer. Other features of the Sunseeker Duo are a retractable landing gear and folding wings that allow it to take up no more hangar space than a conventional light airplane. It is also possible to take the plane apart and pack it into a trailer.
A view inside the cockpit of the Sunseeker Duo Solar-Powered Plane. | Image: Sustainableskies.org
Company Developing Six-Passenger Solar-Powered Plane
Solar Flight is also working on a six-passenger solar-powered plane. Still in the design stage, the plane’s wing will have a high camber to give it short take-off and landing capability. The primary source of power will be solar cells charging a lithium battery pack, but the company plans to offer an optional range extender. This will be a generator running on unleaded auto gas.
Developed to Operate from Escort Carrier Decks, the F8F Bearcat Barely Missed the Action in World War II
On 23 June 1943, a meeting took place at Pearl Harbor in Hawaii. This particular meeting was between veteran Navy and Marine Corps Grumman F4F Wildcat pilots and Grumman Vice President Jake Swirbul.
The legendary John S. “Jimmy” Thach opined that the most important characteristic in a fighter aircraft was rate of climb. With production of the company’s F6F Hellcat well underway and the type soon to see combat for the first time, Grumman would need to design a completely new aircraft to create a fighter that could operate from the small flight decks of escort carriers.
The F6F was too large and heavy, and the F4F needed to be replaced. The design that Grumman developed to meet the need was designated G-58. You know it as the F8F Bearcat.
F8F-1. Image via US Navy
High Speed Low Drag
Grumman’s design team, led by Bill Schwendler, sought to utilize the proven and powerful Pratt & Whitney R-2800 Double Wasp radial engine to power the G58. They basically designed the smallest fighter around the engine they could. In comparison with the F6F, the G58 was five feet shorter with a seven-foot narrower wingspan and was more than 1,500 pounds lighter.
image via nnam
Didn’t Look Like a Grumman
The G58 did not have the “razorback” structure behind the cockpit that both the F4F and F6F did; the G58 was a bubble canopy design. The G58 utilized heavier-gauge aluminum for its outer skins and was flush riveted and spot-welded together. Longer landing gear legs were required to provide clearance for the large, four-bladed Aeroproducts propeller, which gave the Bearcat its trademark stance.
XF8F-1 Bearcat. Image via NACA/NASA
Better Than the Best Available
Some of the weight savings in the G58 came at the cost of fuel capacity and firepower. The G58 was equipped with a total of four Browning .50-caliber machine guns, whereas many US fighter aircraft had six. These compromises, in turn, meant that the Bearcat would have to perform primarily as an interceptor rather than as a long-range escort. But when the performance numbers were tallied, the G58 was 20% lighter, had a 30% better rate of climb, and was 50 miles per hour faster than the F6F.
image via nnam
Built to Intentionally Shed Its Outer Wings
Detachable wingtips, designed to reduce outer wing panel weight and intended to snap off under high-G loading, proved to be a problematic solution for weight savings. It was thought that a G58 without its outer wing panels could continue flying, but several aircraft were lost due to one or the other of those outer panels not detaching properly, causing asymmetric lift. The wing panels were eventually stressed to the same standards as the rest of the wings and bolted on permanently.
F8F-2s. Image via US Navy
Too Good to Ignore
Just nine months after starting the design of the G58, Grumman test-flew a prototype, now designated XF8F-1, on 21 August 1944. The climb rate was excellent, but stability problems overshadowed the Bearcat’s performance. The addition of a fillet in front of the vertical stabilizer, and later a taller and larger vertical stabilizer, solved the stability issues.
Other issues, including the cockpit being too tight, the trim system, the pitot system, and a low maximum speed for landing gear extension, were also reported. Pilots also wanted six .50-caliber machine guns, but the aircraft was too closely balanced to accommodate two more.
F8F-2. image via US Navy
For the Rest of the Ballad of the Bearcat Bang NEXT PAGE Below
From charter contracts to a possible dedicated fleet, ICE deportation flights are at a turning point.
On Wednesday, 20 August 2025, NBC News broke an exclusive story reporting that US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is exploring the idea of creating an airline dedicated to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) deportation operations. According to the report, ICE would use a new “influx of funds” to potentially establish its own fleet, removing the need to rely on charter operators and contractors.
While costly, the move could allow ICE to double the number of deportations each month. Former ICE Chief of Staff Jason Houser told NBC that under the Biden administration, the agency oversaw roughly 15,000 deportations monthly using between 8 and 14 chartered aircraft. Doubling that number would likely take about 30 aircraft, Houser said. With President Trump calling for one million deportations annually, that would require nearly 83,300 removals per month.
There’s no way that number can be achieved under the current system. Hence, the discussion surrounding the creation of an ICE-run airline.
Buying airplanes isn’t cheap. New jets can run anywhere from $80 million to $400 million apiece, putting a fleet purchase squarely in the multibillion-dollar range. Thanks to a $30 billion appropriation for deportation efforts in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” funding itself may not be the biggest hurdle. Instead, the challenge would be building and running a functioning airline, which would require pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, medics, security officers, and regulatory compliance teams.
For now, though, ICE Air remains a patchwork of charter contracts and subcontracted carriers. And that patchwork is a fascinating one. If you’ve ever spotted a plain white Airbus or Boeing 737 at places like Miami, Mesa, or San Antonio with no obvious airline branding, there’s a good chance you were looking at an ICE flight. From established charter specialists to young budget airlines, a surprisingly diverse group of operators keeps ICE deportation flights moving every day.
Here’s a closer look at who’s doing the flying.
The Prime Contractor: CSI Aviation
A CSI Aviation King Air inside the hangar at ABQ. CSI does not operate ICE deportation flights. Rather, they contract them out to other carriers. | IMAGE: CSI Aviation
CSI Aviation, an Albuquerque, New Mexico-based charter broker that has managed ICE flight contracts for decades, is the leading player in ICE Air Operations.
CSI has signed contracts worth more than $650 million in the last three years, including a no-bid contract valued at up to $219 million (March–August 2025, extendable to February 2026…at the time of this writing, no extension has been publicly acknowledged).
CSI does not operate aircraft directly. Instead, it subcontracts with a mix of commercial and charter airlines to conduct deportation missions.
The company has received over $1.6 billion in ICE contracts across multiple presidential administrations.
This brokerage model means ICE avoids directly owning aircraft, but also ties its operations to whichever carriers are willing and available.
For the airlines, these contracts can be lucrative and predictable. Flights are scheduled regularly, with carriers guaranteed payment for a minimum number of hours and penalties assessed if ICE cancels on short notice. That kind of steady government work is highly attractive in the otherwise cyclical charter market.
The Subcontractors: Who Actually Flies Deportation Missions?
GlobalX (Global Crossing Airlines Group)
An Airbus A320 (N278GX) of GlobalX Airlines turns onto Runway 34 in preparation for take-off from KHPN (Westchester County Airport) | IMAGE: By Dave Montiverdi – HPN – Aircraft of Westchester, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=139091454
Headquarters: Miami International Airport (MIA)
Fleet: 18 Airbus A320 family aircraft (10 A320-200s, 8 A321-200s, with 4 A319-100s on order)
Role: Currently the largest ICE flight operator–by far–, responsible for nearly 80% of removal flights in 2024.
Revenue Impact: Emergency five-year contract signed in Sept. 2023, expected to generate $65M annually.
Other Work: Sports charters and entertainment tours (Lady Gaga, Bad Bunny).
GlobalX’s dual identity—flying celebrity tours one week and ICE deportation flights the next—highlights the diverse charter market where carriers often adapt to very different missions.
Avelo Airlines
An Avelo Airlines Boeing 737-800 (reg. N802XT). Avelo began ICE deportation flights in May 2025 | IMAGE: Avelo AIrlines
Headquarters: Houston, Texas
Fleet: 22 Boeing 737s (7 -700s, 13 -800s)
Role: Began ICE operations in May 2025, flying three aircraft from Mesa, Arizona.
Context: Facing financial pressure, CEO Andrew Levy described the ICE deal as “too valuable not to pursue.”
Backlash: Protests in California and Connecticut, though the airline attributes its recent West Coast retreat to broader financial restructuring.
Avelo is the only scheduled passenger airline currently flying ICE deportation flights. For a young airline looking for financial stability, steady ICE contracts provide a buffer against seasonal swings in leisure demand.
Eastern Air Express (part of Eastern Air Holdings)
An Eastern Air Express Boeing 737 at MCI | IMAGE: Eastern Airlines
Headquarters: Kansas City International Airport (MCI)
Fleet: 22 Boeing 737s (300s, 400s, 700s, 800s)
Role: Subcontractor via CSI, began flying deportation missions in 2025.
Eastern Air Express can trace its roots back to the original Eastern Airlines, founded in 1926 and once one of the nation’s “Big Four” carriers that shaped commercial aviation in the United States. Revived through Dynamic International Airways’ 2018 rebrand, the Eastern name is now associated with long-haul Boeing 777 operations. The company also acquired Hillwood Airways in 2023, rebranding it as Eastern Air Express.
Omni Air International (subsidiary of Air Transport Services Group)
Omni Air International, N828AX, Boeing 777-2U8 ER | IMAGE: By Anna Zvereva – Omni Air International, N828AX, Boeing 777-2U8 ER, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=92748182
Headquarters: Tulsa International Airport (TUL)
Fleet: 15 aircraft (12 Boeing 767s, 3 Boeing 777s)
Role: Operates “special high-risk charters” for detainees unsuitable for commercial flights.
Omni is already known in the charter industry for long-haul military and VIP missions, and ICE deportation flights fit into that same niche.
World Atlantic Airlines (Caribbean Sun)
A World Atlantic Airlines McDonnell Douglas MD-83 on approach at Miami International Airport (MIA) in 2014. Also known as Caribbean Sun Airlines, it is one of several carriers that operate ICE deportation flights. | IMAGE: By BriYYZ from Toronto, Canada – World Atlantic McDonnell Douglas MD-83 N802WA, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=41141180
Headquarters: Virginia Gardens, Florida
Fleet: 5 McDonnell Douglas MD-83s
Role: Historically filled in when iAero Airways could not. Active ICE partner since 2013.
World Atlantic’s aging MD-80 series jets may be rare in US skies today, but they remain useful for charter work.
Other Occasional Operators
Oakland International Airport (OAK)-based KaiserAir utilizes Boeing 737-700 for ICE deportation flights when needed | IMAGE: KaiserAir
KaiserAir – An infrequent player, stepping in sporadically for ICE flights when needed.
Gryphon Airlines (ATS)—Gryphon primarily uses Gulfstream jets to carry out long-distance ICE deportation flights to destinations in Africa, the Pacific, and Europe. In one instance, a Gryphon Air Gulfstream was chartered in March 2025 to fly eight Nepali citizens deported from the United States back to Nepal.
GEO Transport, Inc. (subsidiary of GEO Group) – Uses contracted aircraft, occasionally including large military lifts such as the C-5M Super Galaxy, under a five-year CSI subcontract (expected revenue $25M annually).
Historical Shifts: From iAero to Military Aircraft and Back
The current roster of subcontractors reflects major changes in the last few years. For more than a decade, iAero Airways (formerly Swift Air) was the primary ICE charter provider. At its peak, the airline operated nearly 60 ICE deportation flights per month and earned about $4 million weekly. But after filing for bankruptcy in 2023, its role collapsed, creating opportunities for GlobalX and Avelo.
Early in Trump’s second term, ICE briefly relied on military aircraft for removals. By March 2025, however, the practice was largely abandoned due to inefficiency and high cost. The return to civilian charters restored demand for CSI’s network of private carriers.
Airline
HQ / Base
Typical Aircraft
Role in ICE Operations
Notes
GlobalX (Global Crossing)
Miami, FL (MIA)
Airbus A320 family (A320-200, A321-200)
Primary subcontractor via CSI
Operated most removal flights in 2024; also sports & entertainment charters
Avelo Airlines
Houston, TX
Boeing 737-700/800
Subcontractor via CSI (since 2025)
Three aircraft based at Mesa for ICE; only scheduled passenger airline in this list
Eastern Air Express
Kansas City, MO (MCI)
Boeing 737-300/400/700/800
Subcontractor via CSI
Entered ICE rotation in 2025
Omni Air International (ATSG)
Tulsa, OK (TUL)
Boeing 767-200/300, 777-200
Special high-risk & long-haul charters
Used on intercontinental missions and for detainees unsuitable for commercial flights
World Atlantic Airlines
Virginia Gardens, FL
McDonnell Douglas MD-83
Historical subcontractor and overflow
Active since 2013; took more work after iAero bankruptcy
KaiserAir
Oakland, CA
Boeing 737 variants, Gulfstreams
Occasional subcontractor
Sporadic participation
Gryphon Airlines (ATS)
Mesa, AZ (AZA)
Small jets (14–16 seats)
Rare long-distance missions
Used for Africa, Europe, Pacific routes
GEO Transport, Inc. (GEO Group)
Boca Raton, FL
Uses contracted or military aircraft
CSI subcontract
Five-year deal; ~$25M per year
Swift Air / iAero Airways (hist.)
Miami, FL
Boeing 737-400/800
Former primary subcontractor
Bankrupt in 2023; work shifted to other carriers
Flight Patterns and Hubs
View of first runway at new airport in Everglades that was to be the world’s largest airport. Today, it is the site of “Alligator Alcatraz,” and ICE deportation flights.
ICE Air Operations are centered around five primary hubs:
San Antonio International Airport (SAT) | San Antonio, Texas
Miami International Airport (MIA) | Miami, Florida
Alexandria International Airport (AEX) | Alexandria, Louisiana
Brownsville South Padre Island International Airport (BRO) | Brownsville, Texas
One of the most well-known facilities is the “Alligator Alcatraz” site at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport (TNT) in the Florida Everglades, a former training airport now dedicated to ICE operations.
Schedules are unpublished, but flights reportedly operate daily from each hub.
Regional Distribution
According to 2025 data compiled by flight trackers and advocacy groups, ICE deportation flights are heavily concentrated in the Northern Triangle countries of Central America:
Guatemala: Between 48 and 54 flights per month (May–July 2025).
Honduras: Between 35 and 49 flights per month.
El Salvador: 17 to 22 flights per month.
Mexico: Roughly 8–15% of monthly removals, with a dip in July 2025.
Flights to South America average around 25–35 per month, while Africa receives 10–13 deportation flights monthly. These flights often require long-range aircraft such as Omni Air’s 767s and 777s or small Gulfstream jets provided by Gryphon.
Domestic Shuffle Flights
An often overlooked aspect of ICE Air is the large number of domestic transfer flights, known as “shuffle flights.” These flights move detainees between detention facilities across the United States before their international departure.
In July 2025 alone, watchdogs tracked 727 shuffle flights, compared with 207 removal flights.
These flights are critical for capacity management, as detention centers frequently reach their limits.
Aircraft used are often the same narrowbodies that later fly deportation missions, meaning carriers like GlobalX may operate multiple domestic hops before a removal flight abroad.
Aircraft Utilization and Routing
Operationally, ICE deportation flights mirror charter airline logistics:
Multi-stop routings are common. A single flight may carry detainees to multiple destinations in Central America to maximize efficiency.
Long-haul missions to Africa or Europe sometimes use combination aircraft or require fuel stops along the way.
Because flights operate from only five hubs, detainees are often transported long distances domestically before their deportation—sometimes involving two or three separate flights.
Scale of Operations
Monthly totals in 2025 illustrate the scale:
May 2025: 190 deportation flights.
June 2025: 209 flights (record high since Sept. 2021).
July 2025: 207 flights.
Adding shuffle flights, total ICE-related aircraft movements are far higher, often exceeding 900 flights per month.
The Cost of Contracting vs. Owning
GlobalX Airbus A321-231 | IMAGE: GlobalX
Each deportation flight costs roughly $100K–$200K, with hourly rates around $25K. By the end of July 2025, more than 1,000 flights had already been flown, suggesting annual spending well into the hundreds of millions.
Comparisons to the commercial airline sector are revealing. A domestic US airline typically targets 10–15 hours of daily utilization for its aircraft to maximize revenue. ICE charters, by contrast, often operate at lower utilization rates but carry guaranteed revenue from the government. For carriers like GlobalX and Avelo, ICE work represents high-margin flying that can stabilize finances even when passenger markets are soft.
If ICE were to buy its own fleet, it would remove airlines from public criticism but inherit all the responsibilities of a commercial operator—recruiting staff, training crews, maintaining aircraft, and managing scheduling and compliance.
A Decision with Significant Implications
A Boeing 737-4Q8 assisting with ICE deportation flights | IMAGE: US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
The future of ICE Air may be at a crossroads. For years, deportation flights have been carried out through a patchwork of charter operators, brokers, and subcontractors. But with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem openly floating the idea of a dedicated ICE-run airline, the discussion is shifting from routine contract renewals to the possibility of a government-operated fleet.
From an aviation perspective, that would be a seismic change. Building an airline from scratch would make ICE responsible for everything a commercial carrier manages every day: pilot and cabin crew training, FAA compliance, aircraft acquisition and maintenance, labor agreements, and long-term fleet planning. While agencies like the US Marshals Service operate a handful of aircraft, no federal agency has ever run a passenger airline at scale.
Economically, the key debate is whether ICE would own or lease its fleet. Leasing narrowbodies such as Airbus A320s or Boeing 737s would lower the up-front cost and offer flexibility, while outright ownership would give the agency full control over utilization. Either way, staffing requirements would be immense. A fleet of 30 aircraft, using commercial norms, could require thousands of employees across pilots, dispatchers, mechanics, medics, and security personnel.
The ripple effects wouldn’t stop there. For airlines like GlobalX and Avelo, ICE contracts provide steady, high-margin flying that helps balance their books. If ICE transitions to its own fleet, those contracts could vanish, forcing carriers to chase more volatile charter business. On the flip side, some airlines that have faced protests for their ICE work might quietly welcome being removed from the equation.
Operationally, a dedicated ICE airline could offer efficiency gains. Today’s mix of subcontracted carriers leads to multi-stop routings, extensive “shuffle flights” moving detainees between facilities, and logistical complexity. A standardized fleet with dedicated scheduling could streamline operations and reduce costs over time. Still, standing up an airline of this size would take years, and the federal government is not exactly the poster child for moving quickly.
It bears watching how this all plays out. Deportation flights are a small slice of the US air transport system, but they are unusual in how they bring together government funding, specialized logistics, and private-sector flying. If ICE does move ahead with its own airline, it could reshape not only immigration enforcement but also the unique segment of government charter aviation—a market that, until now, has quietly thrived behind the scenes.
For the moment, ICE Air remains a fleet you won’t find in any published timetable. But if you’ve ever spotted a plain white 737 or A320 taxiing at sunrise from Mesa, Miami, or San Antonio, you may have already seen it in action.