Home Blog Page 45

The MD-90 Mad Dog Flies Again!

The McDonnell Douglas MD-90 has been resurrected…sort of. 

A former Delta Air Lines MD-90 (reg. N930TB) took off from the Southern California Logistics Airport (VCV) in Victorville, Calif., last week. Its destination was just 43 miles away, where it arrived at Palmdale Regional Airport in Palmdale, Calif., 14 minutes later. 

However, avgeeks hoping to see the iconic “Mad Dog” in the skies again shouldn’t get their hopes up. 

N930TB is the first of two former Delta MD-90-30s – now owned by Boeing Capital Corporation – that will become part of NASA’s Sustainable Flight Demonstrator (SFD) program. 

What is the Sustainable Flight Demonstrator Program 

Example of Transonic Truss-Braced Wing
Artist depiction of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing | IMAGE: NASA

According to NASA, the purpose of the SFD program is “to engage with industry, academia, and other government organizations to identify, select, and mature key airframe technologies – such as new wing designs – that have a high probability of transitioning to the next generation single-aisle seat class airliner.” 

The 153-feet long MD-90 airframes will be shortened to become full-scale demonstrator aircraft – dubbed by the U.S. Air Force as the X-66A – to test the capabilities of the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) design. The design is a collaboration between NASA and Boeing and is considered the most likely candidate for future airframe development. By repurposing these airframes, the X-66A will mark Boeing’s first commercial demonstrator aircraft since 1954, a milestone reminiscent of the origins of the iconic Boeing 707. 

The ultimate goal of the SFD program is to help make air travel more sustainable. With the TTBW design and other technological advances in propulsion systems, materials, and systems architecture, NASA aims to reduce emissions by up to 30 percent (compared to the 737 MAX). 

NASA says the agency expects the X-66A to begin conducting missions by 2028.

The successful implementation of the TTBW concept may lead to its adoption by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) for single-aisle aircraft in the 2030s, aligning with the U.S. Aviation Climate Action Plan’s goal of achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Breaking Down the Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Concept 

nelson and plane
NASA Administrator Bill Nelson holds a model of an aircraft with a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing | IMAGE: NASA/Joel Kowsky

The TTBW design will strategically focus on transforming the performance of single-aisle airliners, a segment responsible for nearly half of the world’s aviation emissions.

The concept involves integrating an ultra-slender and lightweight composite wing atop the airframe, stabilized by two diagonal lift-generating struts. The struts will help significantly reduce drag and improve aerodynamic efficiency during transonic flight conditions. This innovative design allows for smoother airflow over the wings, reducing fuel consumption and emissions while enhancing the overall aircraft’s performance and range.

With a wingspan measuring 170 feet, the TTBW design will be shorter than the Airbus A350 and Boeing 787 in terms of length. But it will exceed the wingspan of the Boeing 737 MAX 8, which spans 117 feet.

“The Transonic Truss-Braced Wing is the kind of transformative concept and investment we will need to meet those [achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050] challenges,” says Bob Pearce, NASA associate administrator for the Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate. “The technologies demonstrated in this project have a clear and viable path to informing the next generation of single-aisle aircraft, benefiting everyone that uses the air transportation system.” 

In its current form, the TTBW design will be able to withstand speeds of up to March 0.80, similar to today’s jetliners.  

From Mad Dog to X-Plane 

Delta Air Lines MD-90-30
Delta Air Lines MD-90-30 (reg. N908DA) landing at KLAS on 24 September 2006 | IMAGE: Marco Dotti/planespotters.net
Former Delta Air Lines MD-90-30
Boeing Capital Corporation MD-90-30 (reg N930TB) at Victorville | IMAGE: Sebastian Kissel/planespotters.net

Both future X-66A demonstrators will feature the fuselages of former Delta Air Lines MD-90s. 

The first to make the move to Palmdale was N930TB (tango bravo stands for truss-braced). She spent her entire life at Delta Air Lines as N908DA. 

The Long Beach-built Mad Dog began service with Delta in September 1995. After nearly 25 years of service, she sadly became a victim of the COVID pandemic. She was stored at Arkansas International Airport (BYH) in Blytheville, Ark., on 19 March 2020. Just under a year later, on 13 January 2021, she would move to Victorville. 

In March 2021, she was purchased by Boeing and received her new registration, N930TB. She would remain in Victorville until her short flight to Palmdale on 21 July 2023. 

The second MD-90 was originally delivered to China Northern Airlines in February 1999. She would remain with China Northern until October 2011. Shortly after, she became a Delta bird in November 2011 and began service with them in April 2012 with the registration N962DN. 

Suffering the same fate as N930TB, she was parked at BYH on 29 April 2020 as a result of the pandemic. She would remain at BYH until 18 December 2020, when she was transferred to VCV. 

Purchased by Boeing in 2021, she was re-registered as N931TB. We don’t yet know when she will make the jaunt to Palmdale. For now, she sits at VCV, awaiting her next assignment. 

Beond: A New Era of Luxury Air Travel Takes Flight in the Maldives

A new airline is set to redefine the world of luxury air travel when it takes to the skies for the first time this September. 

Known as Beond (pronounced like the word “beyond”), the new airline will focus on flights from Velana International Airport (MLE) in Malé, the capital city of the Republic of Maldives. Headquartered in Dubai, Beond aims to set new standards as the “world’s first all-premium class leisure-oriented airline.” Its primary objective is to connect the Maldives to key destinations in Europe, Asia, Australia, and–eventually–South Africa.

The company was founded in 2022 by three aviation industry veterans, including CSO Max Nilov (previous experience includes Boeing, Lufthansa, and Aeroflot), CEO and chairman Tero Taskila (Finnair, AeroMexico, Qatar Airways, and Gulf Air), and CCO Sascha Feuerherd (Lufthansa). 

The ambitious venture is a collaboration between Dubai-based investment firm Arabesque and the Maldivian hospital group SIMDI Group. 

Beond Plans to Surpass 50 Destinations Across 26 Countries by 2028

Proposed BeOnd route map
IMAGE: flybeond.com

According to Beond’s website, the carrier plans to begin operations in September with flights to Dubai, United Arab Emirates (DXB), and Delhi, India (DEL). The carrier intends to surpass 50 destinations across 26 countries with a fleet of 30-35 aircraft within five years. 

What sets Beond apart from other carriers operating premium services from the Maldives, however, is their strategic use of narrow-body Airbus aircraft. Initially, the carrier will deploy three leased Airbus A319 aircraft, each equipped with 44 lie-flat seats in a 2-2 configuration. A standard A319 typically accommodates 156 seats in a 3-3 configuration. By the end of 2023, four more A319s will join their fleet, all leased from San Francisco-based lessor Babcock & Brown Aircraft Management (BBAM).

Beond plans to expand further by introducing Airbus A321LRs to the fleet in 2024. These longer-range variants will feature 68 lie-flat seats in a 2-2 configuration. Typically, an A321 would have around 220 seats. 

Once the A321LRs come online, the carrier can serve Europe, the Far East, and Australia. A route map on Beond’s website indicates the carrier has plans to fly as far west as Paris and Munich, as far north as Astana, Kazakhstan, and as far east as Tokyo, Seoul, and Perth. 

Ride in Luxury to Paradise

BeOnd Airbus A321
IMAGE: flybeond.com

As a premium airline, one would expect that Beond would have some pretty impressive amenities. And indeed, they do.

Travelers can check-in in the comfort of their homes – including baggage, which will be delivered to the aircraft via concierge. The carrier plans to offer limousine service to the airport, where passengers will wait in premium lounges inside private jet terminals (where possible). 

The lie-flat seats are the work of Italian boutique seat manufacturer Optimares. The all-leather seats will be in a 2-2 configuration, which means there will be no middle seat. 

BeOnd's aircraft will feature lie-flat seating in a 2-2 configuration.
BeOnd’s aircraft will feature lie-flat seating in a 2-2 configuration | IMAGE: flybeond.com

Once on board, travelers will experience a culinary adventure, indulging in Michelin-star cuisine. Passengers can stay connected with full Bluetooth connectivity, while every seat will feature iPad Pros, wireless headsets, USB ports, and power outlets. 

BeOnd's aircraft will feature lie-flat seating in a 2-2 configuration.
BeOnd’s aircraft will feature lie-flat seating in a 2-2 configuration | IMAGE: flybeond.com

The carrier also plans to offer exclusive packages at luxury Maldivian resorts. 

“We don’t just fly aircraft,” it says on its website. “We make traveling a way of life, creating magic memories that last a lifetime.” 

And what about the price tag? Officials from Beond say fares will be structured to compete with business class fares on other airlines. Despite facing tough competition from ultra-premium products offered by airlines like Emirates, Qatar Airways, and Etihad, Beond will be the only airline offering an all-premium product to Malé. Beond leadership believes their product will pave the way for long-term success. 

Beond Will Become the Maldives’ Second Flag Carrier

BeOnd Airbus A321
IMAGE: flybeond.com

The Maldives is a stunning tropical archipelagic paradise located about 470 miles from the southwest coast of India in the Indian Ocean. Comprised of 26 atolls, the Maldives has become a playground for the ultra-wealthy in recent decades. 

Its biggest city and capital, Malé, is served by Velana International Airport (MLE). 

The current Maldivian flag carrier is Island Aviation Services, operating under the brand name Maldivian. However, Maldivian’s service is somewhat limited, relying on a fleet of aging aircraft, including 44-year-old De Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otters, De Havilland Canada Dash-8s, one ATR 42 and two ATR 72s, and a single Airbus A320. The Dash-8s and ATR 42/72s service most domestic airports in the country, while the lone A320 operates on international routes to India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, and Thailand. 

Recognizing the country’s need for a more globally connected carrier, Beond will become the second carrier granted flag carrier status.

An Indian Airlines A320 lands at Malé International Airport
An Indian Airlines Airbus A320 lands on Runway 18 at Malé International Airport | IMAGE: commons.wikimedia.org

With ambitious plans and a beautiful product, Beond has much at stake in terms of its success. However, the carrier is candid about its perspective on its heavenly home in paradise. As stated on its website, its mission is to “deliver you to heaven on earth.” 

And from all indications, this ride to paradise will be nothing short of extraordinary. 

Pilot Faces Jail After Landing Helicopter for Picnic in National Park

A Colorado man is facing federal fines and jail time, after he landed a helicopter for a picnic (allegedly) in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming.

Earlier this year, Peter Smith of Gunnison, Colorado was cited for flying a fixed wing aircraft below minimum safe altitude, against FAA regulations in the Curecanti National Recreation. A federal judge ordered him to pay a $530 fine for that.

63990A6A D031 4126 A230 8DDB7ECABED9
Pilot Faces Jail After Landing Helicopter for Picnic in National Park 15

This time, however, he allegedly decided to level up and take a helicopter and a lady for a lakeside picnic. Which sounds nice, except for the fact that unauthorized helicopter landings are illegal inside Grand Teton National Park.

Rangers took a boat to confront and cite Smith

According to the National Park Service, rangers were alerted to Smith’s illegal landing on June 24, when he landed on a remote beach in Moran Bay, on the west shore of Jackson Lake. The area is only accessible via boat or a 10-mile hike.

8223C0DC 8195 46E9 8B81 B0149806A632
Pilot Faces Jail After Landing Helicopter for Picnic in National Park 16

And it wasn’t as if he didn’t think nobody would notice. There was boats and jet skiers on the lake, so he claimed he thought he was outside of the park’s boundaries.

Whatever the case, if he assumed nobody would report him, then he obviously doesn’t ‘vibe’ with other outdoor enthusiasts in the area. They love their parks and won’t hesitate to turn in someone who is disturbing the experience ESPECIALLY helicopter pilots who think they can play wherever and whenever they want.

Whatever the case, the rangers responded by boat and issued Smith two federal citations. One for operating an aircraft in an undesignated location and another for not following FAA regulations.

EB9727ED EBEF 4951 9563 60EB12AFEA58
Pilot Faces Jail After Landing Helicopter for Picnic in National Park 17

More specifically, he has been charged with violating the following:

“Operating or using aircraft on lands or waters other than at locations designated pursuant to special regulations” and “Use of aircraft shall be in accordance with regulations of the FAA.”

Each violation is a Class B misdemeanor that could include up to a $5,000 fine and/or 6 months in jail ($10,000 & 1 year jail total if convicted of both). He is scheduled to go before a federal judge in Wyoming on August 15.

Smith claims bad weather forced him to land, NPS says no way

DCF57CD2 AF6C 4357 87F4 338CFA09C7E6
Pilot Faces Jail After Landing Helicopter for Picnic in National Park 18

Smith denies the ranger’s claim that he was picnicking. In an interview with the Associated Press, Smith claimed the weather was getting bad and he was “trying to cross over the Tetons and we couldn’t, so we landed. We were not having a picnic. We were landing. If that’s the safe course of action, that’s what needs to happen.”

Smith declined to comment about where he and his passenger were coming from and going to. He also would not confirm if it was a hired or personal flight.

“It’s pretty clear that this guy is just throwing whatever he can up against the wall,” said Dave Sollitt, executive director of the Jackson Hole Conservation Alliance, which has spent years fighting helicopter tourism in the Tetons.

But that, is another story by itself.

Lockheed Drops More Hints of New Aircraft On Social Media

0

For at least the second time this year, Lockheed Martin is dropping hints of a new aircraft on social media. The image, released in a short video via the company’s Instagram page yesterday, celebrates the 80th anniversary of their legendary Skunk Works division.

7 Things to Know about the FAA’s Next-Gen Control Tower

The air traffic control tower (ATCT) of the future is coming to an airport near you, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced last week. 

The FAA says it has selected a concept designed by New York City-based Practice for Architecture and Urbanism (PAU) for the new facilities. PAU vied against studios from around the world for the honor of designing the FAA’s “new, modular, energy-efficient air traffic control towers.”

The new towers will feature elements that align with the US aviation industry’s ongoing drive toward sustainability. 

1. The first phase will replace older control towers at 31 mostly smaller municipal airports

FAA unveils next-generation control tower
IMAGE: FAA/PAU

The 31 candidate airports for the new ATCT facilities are mainly smaller municipal and regional airports around the country. The FAA considers the existing towers at these airports to be well beyond their age of usefulness.

FAA unveils next-generation control tower
The locations of the first phase of next-generation control towers | IMAGE: FAA
AIRPORT CODEAIRPORT NAMECITY
AHNAthens-Ben Epps AirportAthens, GA
ALNSt. Louis Regional AirportEast Alton, IL 
BFMMobile International AirportMobile, AL
BLIBellingham International AirportBellingham, WA 
DETColeman A. Young International AirportDetroit, MI
EMTSan Gabriel Valley AirportEl Monte, CA
EYWKey West International AirportKey West, FL
FCMFlying Cloud AirportEden Prairie, MN
FLOFlorence Regional AirportFlorence, SC
FMYPage Field Fort Myers, FL 
FTWFort Worth Meacham International Airport Fort Worth, TX 
GLHGreenville Mid-Delta AirportGreenville, MS
HFDHartford-Brainard AirportHartford, CT 
HKSHawkins Field AirportJackson, MS
LAWLawton-Fort Sill Regional AirportLawton, OK
LEBLebanon Municipal AirportWest Lebanon, NH
LOUBowman Field Louisville, KY 
MCNMiddle Georgia Regional AirportMacon, GA
MODModesto City-County AirportModesto, CA
MVYMartha’s Vineyard AirportWest Tisbury, MA 
MWAVeterans Airport of Southern IllinoisMarion, IL
OGDOgden-Hinckley AirportOgden, UT 
PAHBarkley Regional AirportWest Paducah, KY
PIHPocatello Regional AirportPocatello, ID 
PNENortheast Philadelphia AirportPhiladelphia, PA 
PUBPueblo Memorial AirportPueblo, CO 
RDGReading Regional AirportReading, PA
RVSTulsa Riverside AirportTulsa, OK
SLESalem Municipal AirportSalem, OR
TOPPhilip Billard AirportTopeka, KS

2. The new design complements the FAA’s goal of net-zero aviation emissions by 2050

U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg says the new ATCT design is a win for smaller airports and communities nationwide. 

“These new air traffic control towers will mean that smaller airports can handle more flights, more sustainably, and more affordably,” said Buttigieg. “I look forward to seeing this design go from the drawing board to construction sites across the country, helping our nation’s airports support more travelers, grow their local economies, and prepare for the future of low-carbon aviation.” 

FAA unveils next-generation control tower
Artist rendering of new control tower at Key West International Airport (EYW) | IMAGE: PAU

3. Sustainability is a key focus

FAA next-generation control tower
IMAGE: PAU

As the United States and the world continue pushing for a greener future, the FAA says the selected tower design will incorporate features focusing on sustainability. 

The design encompasses crucial sustainable features, which consist of the following:

  • Building systems powered entirely by electricity
  • Materials and products that are free from chemicals that are known to be hazardous to health
  • An energy-efficient exterior wall design
  • Steel and metal products with high-recycled content
  • The use of renewable mass timber wherever possible
  • Geothermal heating and cooling systems, where possible

By incorporating these features, the 31 new ATCTs will contribute to the FAA’s objective of developing a sustainable aviation system with net-zero emissions in the United States by 2050.

FAA next-generation control tower
IMAGE: PAU

4. The design honors the legacy of architect I.M. Pei 

Architect IM Pei
IMAGE: FAA

Many American ATCTs are considered midcentury modern. This style of architecture, popular in the 1950s and 1960s, has left its mark at airports throughout the United States. 

During the Kennedy administration, an initiative was conceived to update and improve America’s federal buildings, including control towers, which led to the standard for American ATCTs. One of Kennedy’s main goals for the initiative was to ensure that the facilities projected “the dignity, enterprise, vigor, and stability of the American national government.”

The 1962 design, similar to the new concept, was the winning entry in a competition. The winning idea was the brainchild of the late Chinese-American architect Ieoh Ming (I.M.) Pei, who is renowned for designing an impressive list of iconic buildings worldwide, including the Louvre Pyramid in Paris, Dallas City Hall, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, Hong Kong’s Bank of China Tower, and the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston.

A first-generation control tower designed by architect IM Pei at Elmendorf AFB in Anchorage, Alaska
A first-generation control tower at Elmendorf AFB in Anchorage, AK | IMAGE: FAA

5. IM Pei’s midcentury control tower design is still in use at many airports

ATC Tower at Chicago O'Hare
At 150 feet tall, Chicago O’Hare International Airport’s control tower is a prototype of IM Pei’s midcentury FAA control tower design | IMAGE: Photo by Miguel Ángel Sanz on Unsplash

The midcentury design showcased an uncomplicated and adaptable modular kit, allowing it to seamlessly integrate with any airport across America. The tower was comprised of three components: a subterranean base building for technicians, a stand-alone concrete tower with a flared top, and a pre-manufactured control cab with standard FAA equipment and non-reflective windows, ensuring its familiarity in all air traffic facilities throughout the nation.

Initially, over 70 towers of varying heights of between 60 and 150 feet were proposed. However, following Kennedy’s assassination, the new administration changed the course of the project, and less than 20 ATCTs were ultimately built. Some of the towers are still in use today at airports such as Sacramento International Airport (SMF), Dane County Regional Airport (MSN) in Madison, Wisc., Jacksonville International Airport (JAX) in Florida, and the 150-foot prototype at Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD). Others have been remodeled, decommissioned, or demolished. 

6. The new design is a modern twist to the ATCTs we’re familiar with

FAA next-generation control tower
IMAGE: PAU

The FAA required a design to make the updated ATCT facilities “repeatable, modifiable, sustainable, economical, and rapidly constructible.” 

PAU’s design, which includes all of the requirements, will assimilate many of the original features of Pei’s midcentury work, ensuring that his legacy endures. The concept will incorporate a contemporary touch, with an emphasis on minimizing construction and operational expenses.

FAA next-gen control tower
IMAGE: FAA

Instead of the traditional box-shaped structure, the new facilities will feature a central cylindrical column. To provide flexibility, a metal frame will encircle the freestanding structure, allowing for the addition of adaptable metal boxes for storage and janitorial services. At the top of the cylindrical structure will be an eight-sided control room resembling the ones we see today. The control room will focus heavily on employee wellness by incorporating natural lighting and ventilation, and other comfort systems.

The updated towers will be adaptable to heights between 60 and 119 feet, depending on the needs of the airspace and the surrounding environment.

FAA next-generation control tower
IMAGE: PAU

7. Construction could begin next year 

FAA Next-Gen Control Tower
IMAGE: PAU

The FAA says it hopes to break ground on some of the new towers in 2024. Although only 31 airports are candidates in this phase, FAA officials say they plan to construct more than 100 ACTCs in the coming years. 

Throughout the United States and its territories, the FAA operates more than 200 regional and municipal towers. 

The FAA has allocated more than $500 million to support “site evaluation, preparation, and early construction activities,” thanks to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act – more commonly known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill. 

The video announcing the FAA Tower Design Initiative

Tigershark: When What Might Have Been Became What Never Was

When this promotional film was produced in the early 1980s to extol the virtues of the Northrop F-5G (F-20) Tigershark, the jet was competing with the likes of the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon. Though it was an evolutionary development of Northrop’s by-then successful F-5E Tiger fighter bomber, the Tigershark was much more than just a single-engine Tiger.

In the film the F-20 and its capabilities are described in great detail. This film was uploaded to YouTube by PeriscopeFilm. You Tiger and Tigershark fans should definitely enjoy it.

F-20 Tigershark in flight
Official US Air Force photograph

The F-20 was powered by a modified version of the same General Electric F404-GE-100 engine as those found in the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18A/B/C/D Hornet series of strike fighters. The single F404 engine in the F-20 was capable of producing 60% more thrust than the two GE J85 engines in the F-5E, giving the Tigershark vastly improved performance.

The F-20 was also equipped with a more modern and more capable avionics suite built round the AN/APG-67 multi-mode radar. At one time, the F-20 was even envisioned as a dedicated aggressor aircraft for dissimilar air combat training (DACT).

F 20 Agressor
Official US Air Force photograph

The F-20 cockpit had much more in common with the F/A-18 cockpit than the F-5E, with several large multi-mode displays. The F-20 was capable of delivering the Mark 8X-series unguided bombs and the AGM-65 Maverick air-to-ground missile, along with the AIM-9 Sidewinder and AIM-7 Sparrow air-to-air missiles.

But because the F-20 was not that much less expensive than the F-16 its sales prospects were slim. Despite the endorsement of Brigadier General Chuck Yeager, after two of the three prototype aircraft crashed (causing two test pilot deaths) and politics overpowered the program, Northrop pulled the plug on the F-20.

Two f 20 in flying
Official US Air Force photograph

Nationwide, Worldwide: TWA in the 1960s

Trans World Airlines (TWA) entered the 1960s as one of America’s Big Four domestic airlines in terms of revenue passengers carried and revenue passenger miles flown (the other three were American, Eastern, and United).

With a respected name and a proud reputation, TWA in the 1960s boasted a network that stretched from coast to coast and an international system that crossed the Atlantic, serving major cities in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India, and Southeast Asia. Like its competitors, it operated several flights with brand new four-engine jets, while most services were still covered by propeller-driven types.

Everything seemed bright and promising for TWA on the surface.

TWA in the 1960s had a fleet of Boeing 707 aircraft
Boeing 707-131B N751TW was photographed at Los Angeles (LAX). Jon Proctor Collection

CORPORATE TROUBLES FOR TWA

Behind the scenes, not everything was so rosy. The enigmatic Howard Hughes owned most of TWA’s stock. Although he was not the president of the company, not on the board of directors, nor in the company’s employ in any position, he dictated policy from his unseen perch as the ‘owner’ of the company. The area in which he exerted the most influence was aircraft selection and purchase.

Hughes Tool Company (Toolco), the firm through which most of his financial transactions were funneled, would purchase aircraft, then lease them to TWA. When Toolco encountered financial difficulties, the aircraft manufacturers did not get paid, and the jets that TWA had on order – far too few to match its competitors – were delayed in their delivery. TWA officials found it more and more challenging to get in touch with Hughes as he interacted alone with the manufacturers who were building the airline’s jetliners.  

With Toolco in debt, TWA’s aircraft orders languished in limbo. Even the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) was concerned that Howard Hughes was not managing affairs in the best interest of Trans World Airlines. The company desperately needed the 30 Convair 880 jetliners that Toolco had ordered, supposedly meant for TWA.

9 CV 880 N826TW LAX 1967 Terry Waddington 1
Convair 880 N826TW climbs away from LAX in this Terry Waddington photo.

TRAGEDY STRIKES THE AIRLINE

TWA soldiered on, adding a handful of Boeing 707s to its fleet of several dozen Constellations and aging Martin 404s. Then, the company suffered an accident that was all too reminiscent of a similar event four and a half years prior.

On 16 December 1960, a TWA L-1049A Super Constellation (N6907C) collided in-flight with a United Air Lines Douglas DC-8 jetliner as both aircraft were preparing to land at different New York City airports. A total of 140 people lost their lives in the disaster as the remnants of the Constellation fell onto Miller Field on Staten Island while the DC-8 deposited its remains in Brooklyn. It was the worst commercial air disaster at the time. A similar event in 1956, involving a TWA L-1049 and a United DC-7 above the Grand Canyon, had claimed 128 lives and had been the worst commercial air disaster up to that point.

8 TWA 1961 09 01
When Charles Tillinghast took over as TWA’s Chief Executive in 1961, he ordered 30 additional Boeing 707s – 131s for domestic use and 331s for intercontinental service – to beef up the company’s fleet of jetliners.
12 720 051B N793TW 4X5
Four Boeing 720B Fan Jets were leased from the manufacturer as a stopgap measure while TWA awaited delivery of 30 additional 707s. Jon Proctor Collection

A NEW DAY AT TWA

With Hughes still uncooperative, the company’s financiers and the CAB forced his stock holdings into a voting trust. Howard Hughes had lost control of Trans World Airlines.

Delivery of the Convair 880s finally began. They entered service with TWA on 12 January 1961.

Charles C. Tillinghast, Jr., was recruited from Bendix Corporation and was installed as TWA’s chief executive on 17 April 1961.

5 TWA 1961 04 30 European Edition B 2
TWA’s worldwide route map as of April 30, 1961. David H. Stringer Collection

Four Boeing 720B Fan Jets were leased from the manufacturer to add to TWA’s fleet. Tillinghast negotiated with Boeing to purchase 30 more 707s: 20 707-131Bs for domestic use and 10 707-331B Intercontinental models for international service.

A new slogan graced the company’s advertising: “Nationwide, Worldwide, depend on TWA.”

11 TWA 1963 04 28 B
TWA in the 1960s would see the adoption of a new slogan: Nationwide, Worldwide, depend on TWA

TWA JETS FOR THE SHORT HAUL  

When Howard Hughes still held the purse strings, TWA had seriously considered ordering the French-built Sud Aviation Caravelle to handle medium-range flights on its domestic system. Twenty of the type had been ordered by TWA’s competitor, United Air Lines. The improbability of finding financing at the time put an end to the possibility of a Caravelle purchase for TWA.

The decision was made to purchase Boeing’s 727 to satisfy the requirements of medium and short-haul routes. The first of TWA’s 727-31s entered service on 1 June 1964. The -31 models would be joined by stretched Boeing 727-231s in 1968.

15A Hamlin collection n855tw jfk 5 65 mel lawrence photo
TWA Boeing 727 N855TW. Mel Lawrence Photo

To round out the need for short-haul types, the company also ordered twenty Douglas DC-9s, the first of which entered service with TWA on 17 March 1966. These were -14 and -15 models, which continued to work for the airline throughout the next decade.

20 DC 9 14 N1051T DAC ttls via T Waddington 12 1965
This Douglas DC-9-14 served as a demonstrator model which toured the USA in TWA livery but with Douglas DC-9 titles on the fuselage. Douglas Aircraft photo via the Jon Proctor Collection

TWA’s fleet was now sufficiently modernized for the airline to be at its competitive best, and the company was making money. Truly marking the end of an era, TWA operated its last scheduled Lockheed Constellation flight on 6 April 1967. The airline now boasted an all-jet fleet.

A LEGEND LEAVES: FAREWELL TO HOWARD HUGHES

In 1964, the CAB ruled that Howard Hughes could regain his control of TWA, but first, he had to divest himself of his investment in Northeast Airlines, which he did. This was followed by court challenges to the CAB’s ruling that kept Hughes from participating in the company’s operation. He finally sold all of his TWA stock in May 1966, ending his relationship with the airline that he had nurtured since 1939.

23 TWA 1967 08 07 IND
Nationwide, Worldwide: TWA in the 1960s 44

Another new slogan was adopted: “Welcome to the world of Trans World Airlines.”

TWA GOES AROUND THE WORLD

TWA inaugurated its ‘Round the World’ service on 1 August 1969. The CAB had awarded the company authority to serve Hawaii from Los Angeles, continuing to Guam, Okinawa, Taipei, and Hong Kong, which was the terminal point of TWA’s routes stretching around the globe from the opposite direction.

In 1969, TWA surpassed Pan Am in the number of passengers carried across the North Atlantic for the first time. TWA was truly back on top after several bleak years during the early part of the decade.

Hamlin coll bos 8 6 72 n93117 ira ward photo
Boeing 747s opened the door to a brand new era of air travel. Ira Ward photographed N93117 at Boston – Logan (BOS).

One more notable event would take place before the end of 1969. On 31 December, TWA took delivery of its first Boeing 747 “jumbo jet.” The era of the wide-body airliner was about to begin, and Trans World Airlines was ready for the new decade.

Skyknight: The F3D Had a 6:1 Kill Ratio But It’s Remembered More For Its Nicknames

Douglas Built This Versatile Airframe to Work and Work it Surely Did

On 23 March 1948, Douglas test pilot Russell Thaw took off in the prototype XF3D-1 Skyknight for the first time. The first purpose-designed and built jet-powered night fighter, the Skyknight, was successful in that role during the Korean War, achieving a 6:1 kill ratio over the North Korean opposition. The Skyknight would go on to a 20-year service life in several roles for the United States Navy and Marine Corps.

A US Navy Douglas Skyknight in flight
Image via US Navy

One Huge and Heavy “Fighter”

The Skyknight began as Douglas’ design to meet a 1945 Navy Bureau of Aeronautics (BuAer) requirement for a jet-powered, radar-equipped, carrier-based night fighter. Ed Heinemann and his Douglas team designed the aircraft around the large air intercept radar systems in use at the time, with side-by-side seating for the pilot and radar operator. The aircraft’s fuselage was wide and deep with twin underslung engines.

F3D 2 NACA 1953
Image via NACA/NASA

Built to Fulfill a Specific Mission

Douglas interpreted the BuAer requirement for the Skyknight literally. This would be no dogfighter. The Skyknight would function exactly as required by the Navy. With its straight wings and large control surfaces, it would be both a stable gun and radar platform, providing radar performance unseen in any previous night fighter design. The somewhat portly jet was quickly dubbed “Willie the Whale.”

F3D 2 Skyknight of VC 33 in flight 1952
Image via US Navy

Building a Better Skyknight

After the prototype’s first flight, testing continued through 1948. The first production Skyknight flew on 13 February 1950. Given the evolutionary state of jet engines at the time, the Skyknight underwent several engine changes during its early development, resulting in incremental performance improvements, which begat two distinct variants: the F3D-1 and the F3D-2, with improved engines. The Westinghouse AN/APQ-35 was the fire control system in both F3D variants. It, in turn, consisted of three vacuum-tube technology main components: a search radar, a tracking radar, and a tail-warning radar.

eab80d195df405a65a97f9b3192f9032
Image via US Navy

They Got Theirs at Night

The initial F3D-1 aircraft were used primarily to train F3D crews and did not see combat in the Korean War. In September 1952, the Marines began flying 12 of the F3D-2s in Korea. Skyknights shot down a total of six enemy aircraft- the record for any naval aircraft type in the war. When the United States Air Force found it required night-fighter escorts for its B-29 Superfortresses flying night bombing raids, the Marine Skyknights of VMF(N)-513, the Flying Nightmares, filled the role. When, in early 1953, their numbers in theater increased to 24, the Marine F3D-2s were even more effective as B-29 escorts.

765277f8d0331b8ebde377cfdf2e05c8
Image via USMC

For More DRUT Tales Bang NEXT PAGE Below

Air Force One Gets a New Paint Design

0

President Biden has selected a new paint design for the 747s that will fly as the “Next Air Force One,” VC-25B, which are currently being worked on by Boeing for delivery in 2027 and 2028.

The iconic 747 has flown for 6 U.S. Presidents, only designated as Air Force One once the President is onboard. The new livery however really doesn’t look much different from the current one for VC-25A. But there will by three primary differences.

42354007 7248 4EB6 9040 807DD6FEB010
President Joe Biden selected the livery design for the “Next Air Force One,” VC-25B, a design that will closely resemble the livery of the current Air Force One, VC-25A, while also modernizing for the 21st century (usaf image)

“The light blue on VC-25B is a slightly deeper, more modern tone than VC-25A’s robin’s egg blue,” says the Air Force. “Additionally, the VC-25B engines will use the darker blue from the cockpit area vice the VC-25A’s robin’s egg blue. Finally, there is no polished metal section on the VC-25B because modern commercial aircraft skin alloys don’t allow for it.”

A previous design selected under former President Trump’s administration in 2019 was later axed, after a thermal study found “the design would require additional Federal Aviation Administration qualification testing for several commercial components due to the added heat in certain environments,” says the Air Force.

8B6C5FC8 457E 4242 B4EF C04C2E666960
the livery design for the “Next Air Force One,” VC-25B, will closely resemble the livery of the current Air Force One, VC-25A, while also modernizing for the 21st century. (Courtesy rendering)

Few details about upgrades for new 747s

Boeing recently delivered the last 747 they will ever produce. The two being modified for the VC-25B, the next “Air Force One” are already built airframes from a previous international sale that fell through.

According to the Air Force, the current VC-25A planes face capability gaps, rising maintenance costs, and parts obsolescence. The new VC-25B fleet will “feature electrical power upgrades, a mission communication system, a medical facility, an executive interior, a self-defense system, and autonomous ground operations capabilities.”

Reno Air Races to End After Nearly 60 Years

0

In a sad but not surprising announcement today, the Reno Air Racing Association (RARA) has confirmed that this will be the final year for the National Championship Air Races at the Reno-Stead Airport.

The annual air races have been held in northern Nevada for almost 60 years.

0FE0F30D C1D1 4992 A6D1 D3A899E556CA
Pilot’s scott farnsworth and jerry “jive”kerby race eachother at 500 mph (photo: mike killian)

RARA says the Reno Tahoe Airport Authority decided to end the races for a number of reasons, including the region’s “significant growth”.

In a press release today, race organizers gave thanks to the region, communities and supporters who made Reno and air racing synonymous. And they are inviting aviation fans far and wide to one last Reno Air Races this fall, from Sep 13 to Sep 17.

1CC2F60B C512 4D6B A81F 80E4306D8A92
RARA photo

Race organizers say they are confident that the races can continue elsewhere, and are currently exploring several options to host future races.

One last race in Reno

“While we discuss the future of the Air Races, we are grateful for our time at the Reno-Stead Airport and our partnership with the Reno Tahoe Airport Authority. Our event has generated hundreds of millions of dollars for the local economy, while instilling a love for flying in the community and becoming a valued partner to many charities and non-profits.”

561D2418 1EE4 41C7 8F82 95F145B26A48
Rara photo

“The 2023 event is set to return with more than 150 planes and pilots,” added RARA, “as well as several ‘hands-on’ displays and experiences including the GRADD-NVBAA STEM Education Discovery Zone, heritage displays, military demonstrations and static displays and more. The event will also mark the third year of competition for the STOL (Short Take-Off and Landing) Drag.”

It’s amazing the races even lasted this long. As they were always tarnished by accidents and fatalities, some of which even killed spectators. Even last year, a pilot was sadly killed. You can read the sobering list of fatalities put together by the Reno Gazette here.

This Famous Flying Fish 737 Will Soon Disappear From The Skies

0

How You Can Help Save Alaska’s Salmon-Thirty-Salmon

After 18 years, the Alaska Airlines “Salmon-Thirty-Salmon” livery will disappear, company officials said Monday. 

The story behind the design stems from an unusual incident in the Alaskan panhandle nearly 36 years ago. 

On 30 March 1987, an Alaska Airlines flight departed Juneau International Airport (JNU) when a bald eagle dropped a fish from its talons, hitting the windshield of the Boeing 737-200 as it passed through 400 feet.

Screen Shot 2023 03 02 at 5.11.07 PM
A newspaper article from 01 April 1987 explaining the collision between an alaska Airlines Boeing 737-200 and a bald eagle | IMAGE: Alaska Airlines

Aside from some grease and scales on the windshield, the incident did not cause any damage to the aircraft. However, it left a lasting impression on the crew (pilot Bill Morin reportedly said, “Did we just hit what I think we hit?”), and sparked an idea that would eventually become the Seattle-based carrier’s iconic Salmon-Thirty-Salmon.

How the Salmon-Thirty-Salmon Came to Be

Alaska Airlines Salmon-Thirty-Salmon
Alaska Airlines’ Salmon-Thirty-Salmon arrives at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) in March 2008 | IMAGE: Andrew E. Cohen via Flickr

The Salmon-Thirty-Salmon livery took flight for the first time in 2005. It was part of a marketing campaign and partnership between Alaska Airlines and the Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI) to promote Alaska’s abundant wild and sustainable seafood stock. The livery featured a 120-foot-long Alaska king salmon on a Boeing 737-400 (registration N792AS). The aircraft also featured the Alaska Airlines logo and the slogan” Wild Alaska Seafood” on the fuselage.

When the Salmon-Thirty-Salmon debuted in 2005, it was an instant hit with passengers and aviation enthusiasts alike. The aircraft quickly became one of the most recognizable symbols of Alaska Airlines and was featured in countless advertisements, promotional materials, and social media campaigns. The Salmon-Thirty-Salmon became so popular that it spawned a series of merchandise, including t-shirts, hats, and even plush toys.

In 2011, the carrier painted over the fish and replaced it with Alaska’s traditional Eskimo livery. 

An Updated Salmon-Thirty-Salmon Livery Debuted in 2012

Alaska Airlines Salmon-Thirty-Salmon Boeing 737-800
Alaska Airlines’ Salmon-Thirty-Salmon, Boeing 737-800 registered N559AS, departs Minneapolis-St.Paul International Airport (MSP) on 12 May 2021 | IMAGE: Chris Lundberg via Flickr

However, the livery proved so popular that in 2012, the company debuted an updated “Salmon-Thirty-Salmon II” livery on a newer Boeing 737-800 (registration N559AS). 

The design process for the 129-foot-long Salmon-Thirty-Salmon II was a collaborative effort between the airline’s marketing team and the aircraft painting company Associated Painters, Inc. The team spent nearly a month refining the design and ensuring that every detail was perfect, including the color of the salmon’s 3,500 scales, the size of its fins, and the placement of its eyes. The design was the brainchild of Seattle artist Mark Boyle. 

The Livery is Set to Disappear in April

Screen Shot 2023 03 02 at 5.05.38 PM
Alaska Airlines Salmon-Three-Salmon Boeing 737-800 | IMAGE: Alaska Airlines

Sadly, the days of Alaska’s giant flying salmon may be coming to an end. Rumors circulating last month were confirmed on Monday when Alaska Airlines announced the livery’s final flight would take place on 17 April. 

N559AS will operate Flight 65, one of the carrier’s infamous “Milk Runs.” Unique to Alaska Airlines, these flights serve as a lifeline to communities that may not otherwise have access to the outside world. Flight 65 departs from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) and serves the Alaskan panhandle communities of Ketchikan (KTN), Wrangell (WRG), Petersburg (PSG), and Juneau (JNU) before ending in Anchorage (ANC).  

The company has yet to say what will replace the fishy livery other than confirming that it would not be a third salmon. 

Here is Your Chance to Save this One-of-a-Kind Livery

51885689014 7ac3a9d1f5 k
Alaska Airlines Salmon-Thirty-Salmon Boeing 737-800 on short final at Washington National Airport (DCA) on 15 Feb 2022 | IMAGE: John Boulin via Flickr

Of course, AvGeeks will not let this beautifully unique livery simply fly into the proverbial sunset. An online petition has been launched for those hoping the airline will reconsider replacing the iconic livery. The change.org petition has received more than 1,100 signatures at the time of this writing. 

The story of the Salmon-Thirty-Salmon is more than just a marketing gimmick. It is a symbol of Alaska Airlines’ commitment to its customers, its community, and the environment. The airline has a long history of serving Alaska and the Pacific Northwest region. The Salmon-Thirty-Salmon is just one example of how the airline has tried to connect with its customers and celebrate the region’s natural resources.

Further, it is a testament to the power of creativity and innovation in marketing. The campaign’s success and the push to save this bit of aviation history reflect Alaska Airlines’ commitment to its customers, communities, and the environment. 

And all because a bald eagle wanted some dinner. 

New Terminal Debuts at Kansas City International

2023 has been really good for Kansas City so far. First, a Super Bowl win. And on Tuesday, the city unveiled a brand new airport.

When Southwest Airlines Flight 904 lifted off from Kansas City International Airport (MCI) on Tuesday morning, it ushered in a new era in the history of Missouri aviation. 

FqDww7SWIAAvef6
Southwest Airlines “Missouri One” prepares for departure at Kansas City International Airport (MCI) on 28 February 2023 | IMAGE: Southwest Airlines

The Chicago Midway (MDW)-bound flight left the gate right on time at 0500 local time Tuesday morning and was the first to depart from the airport’s brand-new, state-of-the-art terminal. It offers travelers a stunning range of amenities and features to enhance the overall travel experience. 

Southwest Airlines check-in counter at Kansas City International Airport
Southwest Airlines check-in counter at Kansas City International Airport | IMAGE: Southwest Airlines

The footprint for KCI’s new terminal takes up just over one million square feet. It is the largest single infrastructure project in the history of Kansas City, something U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg noted during an advance ribbon-cutting ceremony on Monday. 

“In so many ways, this airport is a model for similar efforts across the country. Not only did you deliver the largest infrastructure project this city has ever seen—you did it on time and on budget while supporting over 5,000 construction jobs and working with over a hundred women and minority-owned businesses,” said Buttigieg. “I’m grateful for the tireless work all the leaders here have put into making this project possible for Kansas City. And I look forward to continuing our work to transform airports around the country for the better.”

FqEhMGDXwAg4Tm0
Federal, State, and local dignitaries, including U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, cut the ribbon to Kansas City International Airport’s new terminal on 27 February 2023 | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

The $1.5B Terminal Features 40 Gates

FqEmNazWIAA8Y7B
The B Concourse in Kansas City International Airport’s new terminal | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

The new $1.5 billion terminal was designed to focus on convenience, efficiency, and sustainability. Featuring 40 gates – nine more than the old three-terminal airport – in two concourses, the facility also has the ability to expand up to 50 gates in the future. The new terminal also features a parking garage with more than 6,000 parking spaces connected to the terminal via a sky bridge. This feature alone will make it easier for passengers to park, access their vehicles, and make their way to the terminal without the need for shuttle services.

FqEQ0msWIAIPggy
Outside the new terminal at Kansas City International Airport | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

In addition to the parking garage, the new terminal has a dedicated multi-level curbside drop-off and pick-up area designed to accommodate private vehicles and ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft. The new terminal also features an expanded security checkpoint area with up to 16 lanes and the latest technology, designed to streamline the screening process and reduce passenger wait times. These features will make it easier and more convenient for travelers to navigate the airport, whether arriving or departing.

FqDfSVtWAAUmwqa
KCI’s new terminal features a 16-lane security checkpoint | IMAGE: TSA Southeast on Twitter

Additionally, KCI is now one of 51 airports in the United States to feature an airport security process called CLEAR, which scans the retinas of those who pay for a $189 annual membership. 

Built with the Future in Mind

FqEQ0m3WcAADgHV
New Terminal Debuts at Kansas City International 70

The new terminal at MCI also offers a dazzling array of dining, shopping, and entertainment options for passengers. The facility will feature a post-security food hall with more than 50 restaurants, cafes, and bars serving local and national favorites. The new terminal will also have a range of retail stores, including a duty-free shop where travelers can purchase gifts, souvenirs, and other items. Additionally, the new terminal will have a range of amenities, including visual paging boards for deaf and hard-of-hearing passengers, a children’s play area, a pet relief area, a sensory room, family restrooms, and ten nursing rooms.

KCI’s new airport also features the Kansas City Air Travel Experience, a simulator designed to calm fearful or neurodivergent flyers. The simulation takes a traveler from the parking lot to in-flight and features the check-in process, security screening, and the boarding of an actual portion of an Airbus A320 fuselage.  

The design of the new terminal has been inspired by the region’s natural beauty, with large windows that offer panoramic views of the surrounding landscape and walls made from Missouri limestone. The terminal’s design has been optimized to take advantage of natural light, which will help reduce energy costs and make the space more comfortable for passengers. The terminal will also feature a range of sustainable features, such as energy-efficient lighting, water conservation systems, and the use of local materials, all designed to reduce the facility’s environmental impact.

The new terminal also boasts an impressively intentional collection of artwork from local, national, and international artists. 

A Catalyst for Economic Growth

Kansas City International Airport
A sign welcomes travelers to Kansas City | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

The construction of the new terminal was a significant undertaking involving various stakeholders, including the airport authority, construction firms, and local government. The project was funded through a combination of private and public funds, with the total cost estimated at $1.5 billion.

“This terminal is a new front door to the people of Kansas City, to everyone in our region, in Missouri and Kansas. We are on time, in fact a day early, and on budget,” said Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas. “Because of this project thousands of Missourians and Kansans have gotten jobs and built new careers. [This] project will bring millions, if not billions, of dollars in new economic development to Missouri and Kansas. Because of this project we will build generations more of exceptional memories here at KCI. This project is because of you.”

Kansas City International Boasts 150 Daily Departures

FqEQ0mrXgAMDiM8 1
Inside the new terminal at Kansas City International Airport | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

Historically, KCI served 10-12 million passengers annually until the COVID-19 pandemic decimated air travel in 2020. With 9.82 million passengers passing through KCI in 2022 (up from a 2020 low of just over four million), the new airport will be well-positioned for growth in the coming decades. Eleven airlines offer 150 daily departures to 51 destinations, including Air Canada, Alaska, Allegiant, American, Delta, Frontier, JetBlue, Southwest, Spirit, Sun Country (beginning in May), and United. 

FqDmKDRWYAIvtVZ
The check-in area at Kansas City International | IMAGE: BuildKCI.com

The new terminal is part of a larger renovation project at KCI, which includes demolishing the old terminals, constructing a new runway, and installing new air traffic control systems. Completing the new terminal marks a significant milestone in the airport’s history, offering travelers a modern and efficient facility that is fit for the 21st century and one of which every Kansas Citian should be proud.

Cleveland Jetport: The Story of an Unbuilt Island Airport

Nearly a half century ago, plans were in motion to construct one of the world’s largest airports on a manmade island in the middle of Lake Erie.

The massive new island airport, which would have replaced Cleveland Hopkins International Airport (CLE), took flight in the late 1960s and into the 1970s. Like many ideas in confident post-World War II America, the $1.2 billion proposed Cleveland Jetport, also known as the Lake Erie International Jetport, was intended to be an engineering marvel for the ages.

The Cleveland Jetport was the brainchild of Dr. Abe Silverstein. Considered one of the architects of America’s space program, he was an engineer at the Cleveland-based National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA). When NACA restructured in the late 1950s to become the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Silverstein helped plan the Apollo, Ranger, Mariner, Surveyor, and Voyager missions. He was also responsible for naming the Apollo program.

Although Cleveland Mayor Ralph Locher first announced in 1966 that Cleveland would soon outgrow its airport, Silverstein envisioned transforming Cleveland into a global hub of commerce and transportation. He believed that Hopkins Airport was too small and outdated to meet the needs of a growing city and a rapidly expanding – yet still regulated – airline industry.

The Cleveland Jetport Terminal Would Have Been Ten Times the Size of the Pentagon

illo 1564673347
Plans for the Cleveland Jetport included access for every size jetliner conceivable – including supersonic transports | IMAGE: Cleveland press Collection

Silverstein’s solution was extraordinarily ambitious. He envisioned a sprawling complex constructed on an artificial island five miles off the coast of downtown Cleveland in the middle of Lake Erie. The new airport would feature multiple runways, a terminal ten times larger than the Pentagon, and state-of-the-art cargo and maintenance facilities. The Cleveland Jetport would be a hub for both commercial and private aviation, with ample space to accommodate the largest passenger planes, cargo jets, and smaller regional aircraft. The new airport would also feature accessibility for what was sure to become the next big thing in aviation – supersonic transport.

But the Cleveland Jetport was more than just a plan for a new airport. It was a grand vision for the future of Cleveland, a city that had fallen on hard times in the wake of deindustrialization and urban decay. Silverstein saw the Jetport as a way to revitalize Cleveland’s economy and bring new opportunities to a struggling city.

A Beacon of Hope for A Struggling Cleveland

271008887 10159389471884435 5719970333573789486 n
Aerial View of Downtown Cleveland and adjacent Lake Erie | IMAGE: CLE on Facebook

The proposed island location for the Cleveland Jetport received much support, especially early on. The Boeing 747 was about to come online, supersonic transport was seemingly imminent, and noise pollution was becoming an issue at Cleveland Hopkins’ increasingly suburban location. Proponents of the new Jetport believed it would meet the needs of all these issues.

The Cleveland Jetport quickly became a topic of heated debate in the city. Supporters of the project saw it as a bold and visionary plan that would transform Cleveland into a significant player on the global stage. They argued that the new airport would bring in billions of dollars in revenue and create thousands of new jobs, both in construction and in the ongoing operation of the airport.

A Colossal Waste of Money and Resources

6161 Map ca. 1970s
A map depicting the location and scope of the Cleveland Jetport project | IMAGE: Cuyahoga County Archives

Opponents of the project, however, saw it as a colossal waste of money and resources. They argued that the Cleveland Jetport was an extravagant and unnecessary project that would drain public funds and do little to improve the lives of Cleveland residents. They also raised concerns about the environmental impact of the airport, which would require extensive land clearance and could disrupt the fragile ecosystem of Lake Erie.

In the late 1960s, Lake Erie was in bad shape. Pollution was effectively killing the fourth-largest Great Lake. However, planners touted the environmental benefits of the island’s construction from sand and dirt from the bottom of Lake Erie. A 13-mile stone dike would surround the island to protect it from Lake Erie’s notoriously wild storms. A 13-lane causeway featuring auto, bus, truck, and train lanes would connect the Jetport to the mainland.

An Aeronautical Disneyland

Screen Shot 2023 02 28 at 6.52.17 PM
IMAGE: Cleveland Press Collection

Despite the controversy, plans for the Cleveland Jetport moved forward. Officials poured more than $4 million into feasibility studies throughout the early-to-mid-1970s. Silverstein and Mayor Locher believed Hopkins – which opened in 1925 – would be woefully inadequate by the 1990s. In fact, they estimated that by the year 2000, more than 46 million passengers would be flying in and out of Cleveland. Politicians and citizens alike supported what became known as “Aeronautical Disneyland.”

But as the project moved closer to fruition, it became clear that the Cleveland Jetport would face insurmountable obstacles. In particular, the project ran afoul of the new Cleveland Mayor, Dennis Kucinich. A growing chorus of opponents also lambasted the project’s exorbitant cost (especially considering the economic uncertainties of the late 1970s), environmental risks to fragile Lake Erie and migratory bird routes, and extreme weather conditions routinely experienced on the lake.

Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which had strict regulations in place for airport construction, raised concerns about the size and scope of the Cleveland Jetport, saying Hopkins would be sufficient for the region’s needs until at least the year 2000. Ultimately, the FAA refused to approve the now $2B project and, in 1978, pulled support for the endeavor. The Cleveland Jetport was dead in the water without the FAA’s blessing.

It Turns Out that Hopkins is Just Fine

132019410 10158629154564435 4544047953072001896 n
Aerial View of Cleveland Hopkins International Airport (CLE) | IMAGE: Cle on Facebook

Forty-five years later, Hopkins Airport continues to serve the residents of northeast Ohio. Despite a bold prediction of 46 million passengers by 2000, CLE saw just 13.28 million passengers that year.

The airport was once a hub for Continental Airlines, which, in 2010, merged with United Airlines. United officially dehubbed CLE in 2014, and passenger numbers have continued to fall since, with just under 8.7 million passengers recorded in 2022 (after plunging to 4.1 million amid the pandemic in 2020).

A Symbol of What Could Have Been

6174 Artists Rendering of Jetport in the Lake
If built, the massive airport would have been visible from space | IMAGE: Cleveland State University. Michael Schwartz Library. Special Collections

Looking back on the Cleveland Jetport project, it’s easy to see both the proposal’s ambition and folly. On the one hand, Abe Silverstein’s vision for a massive new airport to bring new economic opportunities to Cleveland was undoubtedly bold and forward-thinking. On the other hand, the project was plagued by unrealistic expectations and logistical challenges that ultimately proved insurmountable.

Despite these challenges, the legacy of the Cleveland Jetport lives on in the imaginations of many Clevelanders. The project symbolized the city’s ambition and determination to reinvent itself in the face of economic adversity. Even though the airport itself was never more than an idea, the concept of a massive new transportation hub that could bring new life and vitality to the city continues to inspire Cleveland residents to this day.

In some ways, the story of the Cleveland Jetport is a cautionary tale about the perils of overambition and unrealistic expectations. While it’s important to dream big and pursue bold ideas, it’s also essential to be realistic about the practical challenges and limitations that any project will face. The Cleveland Jetport may have been a grand vision for the future of Cleveland, but ultimately, it was a project that was simply too big and too complex to become a reality.

WATCH: C-5M Super Galaxies Quick-Turn at Prestwick

These Two Giants Get In, Disgorge, and Get Out Fast – Takeoffs You Have to See to Believe

On 11 July 2018, a pair of Lockheed-Martin C-5M Super Galaxy airlifters descended upon Glasgow Prestwick (EGPK) airport. The two behemoths were supporting a Presidential visit to Scotland, and as such were carrying staff, support personnel, and vehicles for the visit. The aircraft both landed on runway 31.

The first C-5M to land is USAF serial 85-0008 from the 436th Military Airlift Wing (MAW) at Dover Air Force Base (AFB) in Delaware. “Balls 8” later departs bound for RAF Lakenheath. The second C-5M seen is USAF serial 86-0024 from the 60th Air Mobility Wing (AMW) at Travis AFB in California. “Balls 24” later departs bound for Ramstein Air Base.

Enjoy this impressive performance by a pair of larger-than-life haulers as uploaded to YouTube by Mraviationguy. Dig those vapes!

[youtube id=”erFvPMj9zyU” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

C-5Ms Today

The US Air Force bases its current fleet of 52 C-5Ms spread out among a total of nine installations. The two active-duty Air Force Airlift Wings are based at Travis AFB (60th AMW) and Dover AFB (436th MAW). Air Force Reserve (AFRES) C-5M operators are based at Travis AFB (349th AMW), Dover AFB (512th MAW, Kelly/Lackland AFB in Texas (433rd MAW), and Westover AFB in Massachusetts (439th MAW).

The Air National Guard (ANG) previously operated Galaxies from Stewart ANGB in New York (105th MAW), Memphis in Tennessee (164th MAW), and Martinsburg in West Virginia (167th MAW).

5936894a
Dover AFB-based C-5M Super Galaxy. image via USAF/DVIDS

A Little C-5 History

The C-5M weighs some 190 tons when empty. When fully loaded (maximum takeoff weight) the package can weigh as much as 460 tons. The original “legacy” C-5A Galaxy strategic airlifter went into service in 1970, replacing the Douglas C-133 Cargomaster in the heavyweight airlifter category.

Lockheed built a total of 131 C-5 airframes between the 81 original C-5As built between 1968 and 1973 and the 50 improved C-5Bs built between 1985 and 1989. The 52 C-5Ms in service today were upgraded from the 50 C-5B variants as well as the two previous specially modified C-5A(SCM- Space Cargo Modified) jets that were capable of transporting outsize cargo- primarily for Defense Department space programs and NASA.

5498966a
Dover AFB-based C-5M Galaxy. Image via USAF/DVIDS

Pilot Error Blamed for F-35 Crash on USS Carl Vinson Last Year

0

The U.S. Navy has ruled a fighter pilot’s mistake caused the crash of a $115 million F-35C stealth jet on the aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson last year, which injured several sailors (including the pilot).

The incident occurred on Jan 24, 2022, when the pilot from the “Argonauts” of Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) 147 was making a specialized landing approach for the first time called a Sierra Hotel or “Shit Hot” break, where the pilot uses G-forces to slow down through a 360-degree turn before dropping the gear to land.

However, he approached the ship underpower, unaware that a built-in aid to help control the jet’s power during landing was turned off.

7EE8CBD5 682E 4438 9F9E 4C105D24AC49
F-35C on the fliGht deck (navy photo)

And because it was his first time, he had reduced time to configure the jet and conduct landing checks, and missed the last check.

The report notes he “was in manual mode when he should have been (and thought he was) in an automated command mode, designed to reduce pilot workload during landings.”

EC6C0D06 6A7B 4B87 A7E2 DCB6037388A7
Pilot Error Blamed for F-35 Crash on USS Carl Vinson Last Year 82

Once he realized the problem he pushed the throttle to full afterburner to climb, but it was too late. The jet slammed onto the carrier’s ramp, ripping the main landing gear off and skidding across the deck, throwing debris everywhere as the pilot ejected and the jet plunged 12,000 feet to the bottom of the South China Sea.

An EA-18G Growler jet was damaged in the accident, causing over $2.5 million in damage, in addition to another estimated $120,000 in damage to the ship’s flight deck.

92FAAA4D C174 4C70 9467 0C719DC75586
Pilot Error Blamed for F-35 Crash on USS Carl Vinson Last Year 83

Read the FULL REPORT HERE

The report made it clear, that there was no reckless manner or malicious intent by the pilot, who was a top performing junior officers in Carrier Air Wing 2. He was on his first deployment, mentally fit, healthy, and had 650 total flight hours (370 in the F-35C). The jet itself had just over 1400 flight hours on it.

The Navy will be executing a number of the investigation’s recommendations, including internal and external indicators to tell pilots and ground crews (LSOs) that they are not in the flight mode that they might think they are.

The pilot is still in the Navy, but no longer flying.

Billions Down The Drain In Mitsubishi’s SpaceJet Cancellation

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) has pulled the plug on its SpaceJet regional jet program.

The decision came after years of development, multiple delays, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the aviation industry. With the end of the SpaceJet program, the future of the regional jet industry looks highly uncertain, especially in the United States. 

The Rise and Fall of the MRJ Program 

Mitsubishi MRJ
The first Mitsubishi MRJ taxies at Japan’s Nagoya Airport (RJNA) in 2015 | IMAGE: CHIYODA I, CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

In 2008, Japanese manufacturer MHI unveiled the Mitsubishi Regional Jet (MRJ) program to develop a more fuel-efficient and technologically advanced regional jet to compete with regional jet juggernauts Embraer and Bombardier.

MHI developed two variants of the MRJ: the 90-seat MRJ90 and the 70-seat MRJ70. The type underwent flight testing mainly at Washington state’s Grant County International Airport (MWH). However, the development of the MRJ was fraught with delays and setbacks. After its initial rollout in 2014 and maiden flight in November 2015, the company paused the program to address issues with the aircraft’s design and development.

The Dawn of the SpaceJet

71870671 520935048454114 6144314410463657984 n 1
Mitsubishi SpaceJet Rendering | IMAGE: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI)

MHI resumed work on the program in 2019 under the new name SpaceJet. The MRJ90 became the SpaceJet M90, while the company ended development of the MRJ70 in favor of a new 76-seat variant called the SpaceJet M100, designed to meet unique pilot scope clauses in the United States, which caps regional aircraft at 76 pax and 86,000 lbs. 

Mitsubishi also announced plans to purchase the CRJ program from Bombardier in the same year. The company was targeting a mid-2020 delivery date for the first SpaceJet (seven years later than initially planned). The launch customer was Japan’s All Nippon Airways (ANA). The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic caused further delays, and work halted on the program again in October 2020, prompting all flight testing in the United States to relocate back to Japan.

Despite remaining hopeful about restarting the program post-COVID, Mitsubishi ultimately decided to discontinue the SpaceJet program due to disappointing financial results in 2022 and uncertainty in the aviation market. At one point, the company had received 450 orders for the SpaceJet.

A $7.6B Project to Nowhere

01 mitsubishi spacejet mitsubishiaircraft
IMAGE: Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI)

As a result, MHI, the parent company of Mitsubishi Aircraft Corporation (MAC), decided to cut its losses and end the program altogether. 

CEO of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Seiji Izumisawa, expressed his disappointment at a news conference announcing the project’s demise on 7 February. 

“Many people had high hopes and supported the project, so it is very unfortunate that we came to the decision to end it,” Izumisawa said. “We didn’t have enough resources to continue the development over the long term as a private-firm project.” 

Indeed, it was an expensive venture. The company reportedly spent $7.6 billion on the public-private project over 15 years.

Where Does the Regional Jet Industry Go From Here? 

MITSUBISHI MRJ AND EMBRAER ERJ 170STD
A Mitsubishi MRJ prototype taxies past a Fuji Dream Airlines Embraer 175 | IMAGE: By Grasshopper2015 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44659152

With the demise of the SpaceJet program, the failure of Bombardier, an unsuccessful merger attempt between Boeing and Embraer, and no other viable alternatives on the horizon, where does that leave the future of the regional jet industry? 

First, one must determine what constitutes a “regional” jet. Typically, regional jets set between 50-100 passengers. However, the cap at 76 pax and 86,000 lbs in the United States severely limits options. 

This article will consider the Embraer E2 as the only viable alternative. One could also consider the Airbus A220 as a quasi-regional jet, although it seats more than 100, making it unusable by regional carriers in the US. And while regional jet programs are under development in China and Russia, they will most likely never see the light of day in North American or European airspace, especially amid ongoing geopolitical turmoil. 

The A220 was part of Bombardier’s CSeries program, which Airbus later acquired. The E2 is the latest iteration of Embraer’s E-Jet series. Both aircraft have been well-received by customers and are among the most fuel-efficient and technologically advanced regional jets on the market.

Comparing the Airbus A220 and the Embraer E2

Airbus A220 Exterior
Airbus A220 Exterior | IMAGE: Delta Air Lines

The Airbus A220 has two variants: the A220-100 and the A220-300. The A220-100 can carry up to 135 passengers, while the A220-300 can carry up to 160. The aircraft features advanced aerodynamics, a state-of-the-art avionics system, and Pratt & Whitney geared turbofan engines, which reduce fuel consumption and noise. The A220 also has a range of roughly 4,000 miles, making it suitable for both short-haul and medium-haul routes.

A United Express/Skywest Embraer 175
A United Express Embraer 175 operated by Skywest Airlines | IMAGE: United Airlines

The Embraer E2 is available in three variants: the E175-E2, the E190-E2, and the E195-E2. The E175-E2 can carry up to 90 passengers, while the E190-E2 and the E195-E2 can carry up to 114 and 146 passengers, respectively. The E2 features advanced aerodynamics, an all-new avionics suite, and Pratt & Whitney PurePower PW1000G engines. The E2 has a range of up to 3,000 miles.

Both the A220 and the E2 have been well-received by airlines and customers. Several major airlines operate the A220, including Delta Air Lines, Air France, and JetBlue. The E2 is also in service with several major airlines, including Porter Airlines, Azul Brazilian Airlines, and KLM Cityhopper. Both aircraft are among today’s most fuel-efficient and environmentally friendly regional jets. Environmental concerns are becoming an increasingly important factor for airlines as they look to reduce their carbon footprint and comply with emissions regulations.

So Where Does this Leave the US? 

309324175 522988186496729 6620877689946940514 n
American Eagle/piedmont Airlines Embraer 145s on the ramp at Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) | IMAGE: Piedmont Airlines on Facebook

Although regional jets are still a common site at American airports, they are showing their age. And they certainly have lost their customer appeal. Early models are now more than 30 years old, and there is nothing to replace them with besides the first-generation Embraer 175. 

The end of the regional jet does not bode well for scores of small airports across the country that rely on them to connect their cities to the global travel network. 

Will we see carriers turn to turboprops once again? Will this create opportunities for carriers like Southern Airways Express or Silver Airways? Or will more cities see a resumption of mainline service as more A220s come online? 

One thing is sure: with restrictions due to pilot scope clauses, the US is unlikely to see its carriers turn to the E2. 

The SpaceJet’s Demise is a Reminder that Developing New Aircraft is Not Without Risk

Mitsubishi SpaceJet
A Mitsubishi SpaceJet on the ramp at the 2019 Paris Air Show | IMAGE: Matti Blume, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

The end of the SpaceJet program is a significant blow for MHI and the Japanese aviation industry. The development of the SpaceJet was a significant initiative for Japan, and the government invested heavily in the program. The SpaceJet was seen as a way for Japan to enter the regional jet market and compete with other major aircraft manufacturers. However, the program’s failure has raised questions about Japan’s ability to compete in the global aviation market.

The SpaceJet’s demise also highlights the challenges of developing new aircraft. Aircraft development is a long and expensive process with many uncertainties and risks. Even major aircraft manufacturers like Boeing and Airbus have faced significant setbacks in developing new aircraft, such as the Boeing 737 MAX and the Airbus A380.

The failure of the SpaceJet program is a reminder that even well-funded and technologically advanced programs can fail. 

Lufthansa Wants to Upgrade Their Passenger 747s

0

There are only about 40 passenger 747s still flying worldwide, as many airline operators have been retiring the jumbo jet over the last several years. Most airlines just can’t afford it anymore, since newer more fuel-efficient planes are now available.

Those still operating passenger 747s include Asiana Airlines, Mahan Air, Korean Air, Air China and Lufthansa.

K65636 05
Boeing Delivers the First Lufthansa 747-8 Intercontinental (credit: Boeing)

Lufthansa is actually the largest operator of the 747-8, with 19 in its current fleet, and potential commitments to keep them flying for years to come. Most of them are under 10 years old.

Boeing recently delivered the last 747 they will ever make, which we reported about from the company’s 747 factory in Everett, WA (read about that here). And one of the guests there to celebrate was Lufthansa’s CEO, Carsten Spohr, who made it clear that the company’s 747s will not only fly into the next decade, but will also be upgraded in all passenger classes.

2A0A1224
Lufthansa Wants to Upgrade Their Passenger 747s 95

An investment in the future of Lufthansa’s fleet

“Our crews love the 747, our passengers love it, even plane spotters and photographers love it,” said Spohr. “It’s just so good looking! And that’s why we at Lufthansa are currently looking into another upgrade for our 747-8 in all classes, to fly this airplane way into the next decade. It’s something we are proud of, to represent this amazing airplane for many more years.”

The majority of 747s still flying today are for cargo, with over 300 freighters in operation.

Lufthansa does still operate a smaller fleet of 747-400s, but those won’t be flying for many years longer. So they won’t undergo any upgrades like the 747-8s.

090414 ABTL 01
lufthansa photo

It’s unclear however what exactly Lufthansa will do with reconfiguring new cabins, nor have they given a timeline. One Mile at a Time goes into it in a more detail.

Whatever the case, when Lufthansa gives more details we will let you know. But, it’s good to know that they intend to keep providing passengers the experience of flying on the “Queen of the Skies” well into the 2030s.

End of an Era: No scheduled DC-10 Service In The US

When FedEx Flight 147 touched down at Memphis International Airport (MEM) on 31 December 2022, it marked the end of an era for the DC-10.

The flight, which originated at Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ), was the final revenue flight of a FedEx MD-10-30F, one of the most iconic and recognizable commercial airliners in aviation history.

The MD-10 was a mainstay of the fleet of Memphis-based FedEx Express for more than three decades. Its retirement marks the end of an era for FedEx and the aviation industry as a whole.

The Boeing MD-10, of course, is the updated iteration of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10, brought about by FedEx’s request. The update included the integration of a glass cockpit and the elimination of the flight engineer position.

Many of the DC-10s operating at the time underwent MD-10 conversion. Not to be confused with the MD-11, the MD-10 allowed for a common two person cockpit between both types of jets. The larger MD-11 will still soldier on in the FedEx fleet.

The Storied but Controversial History of the McDonnell Douglas DC-10

5 1
DC-10-20 prototype in flight. Image via McDonnell Douglas/Boeing in public domain.

The DC-10 was introduced in 1970 by McDonnell Douglas, the now-defunct American aerospace manufacturer, as a successor to the older DC-8. The aircraft was designed as a wide-body, tri-jet airliner and was initially intended to compete with Boeing’s 747 jumbo jet.

The DC-10 was well received by airlines and passengers alike, offering a spacious and comfortable cabin and a range of up to 5,800 miles. The aircraft became a popular choice for both passenger and cargo airlines and was used by many of the world’s leading carriers.

However, the DC-10 was not without its share of controversy. In the early 1970s, a series of high-profile accidents involving the aircraft raised concerns about its safety and reliability.

The most notable was the crash of American Airlines Flight 191 in Chicago in 1979, which resulted in 273 deaths. Despite these incidents, the DC-10 continued to be operated by many airlines throughout the 1980s and 1990s. The type was eventually retired from passenger service in 2014.

Ultimately, 446 McDonnell Douglas DC-10s were built between 1970 and 1989. The DC-10 far outsold Lockheed’s L-1011 TriStar, its only direct competitor. By comparison, just 249 TriStars were manufactured between 1971 and 1985. 

FedEx and the DC-10

b0f1c98d801eb7061500d60dfa09d999
A Vintage Postcard spotlighting a federal express mcdonnell douglas dc-10 | IMAGE: hippostcard.com

For FedEx, the DC/MD-10 was a mainstay of its fleet for more than three decades. The carrier took delivery of its first DC-10 in January 1986. It was a workhorse for FedEx, with the cargo airline relying on a total of 113 of the type for its reliability and long-range capabilities. 

In recent years, however, FedEx has been transitioning its fleet to more modern and fuel-efficient aircraft, including the Boeing 767 and 777 and the MD-11.

Are there any DC-10s Still Flying? 

With the MD-10 no longer operating for FedEx, it is interesting to note that there are only two remaining MD-10s operating worldwide as of February 2023 – both of which are the cargo MD-10-30F variant.

Transportes Aéreos Bolivianos (TAB) McDonnell Douglas MD-10-30F arriving at Miami International Airport (MIA)
CP-2791 McDonnell Douglas MD-10-30F TAB Transportes Aéreos Bolivianos arrives at Miami International Airport on 17 Jan 2023 | IMAGE: Colin Cooke Photo via Flickr
  • N330AU, operated as the Orbis Flying Eye Hospital. At nearly 50 years old, it was delivered new to Trans International Airlines in April 1973 as N101TV. It would then go on to operate as a cargo/passenger combi with Transamerica Airlines from October 1979 through April 1984. While operating for Transamerica, N101TV was leased to Nigeria Airways and Air Florida in 1979 and 1981, respectively. It was transferred to Federal Express as N301FE in April 1984, where it operated until the company donated the aircraft to Project Orbis in April 2011. 
276061372 10159443908235172 7825358343708217720 n
McDonnell Douglas MD-10-30F N330AU operating as the Project Orbis Flying Eye Hospital | IMAGE: Orbis on Facebook

As for the eight remaining FedEx MD-10s, all but three have made their way to the scrapyard. N311FE, N313FE, N316FE, N318FE, and N319FE have all been transferred to Victorville, California (VCV). Meanwhile, N306FE, N307FE, and N321FE are still on the ground in Memphis as of mid-February 2023.

A few other DC-10s remain:

There are four McDonnell Douglas DC-10 tankers serving in fire fighting capacity, based on the West Coast. Those flights are obviously not scheduled but do fly on demand and for training.

The Strange History of N306FE

N306FE, a Federal Express DC-10, at Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) in June 1986
N306FE, a Federal Express DC-10, at Amsterdam Schiphol (AMS) in June 1986 | IMAGE: Peter Bakema via Wikimedia Commons

The last revenue flight of a FedEx MD-10 was operated with N306FE, the first DC-10 built specifically for FedEx. It began operation with the carrier on 24 January 1986. 

It underwent MD-10 conversion after the Boeing merger and operated FedEx’s final DC/MD-10 flight on 31 December 2022. 

N306FE was also the aircraft involved in one of the most bizarre aviation incidents in history. On 07 April 1994, N306FE was operating Flight 705 on a flight from Memphis to San Jose, California (SJC). A deadheading employee attempted to overpower the cockpit crew and hijack the airplane. Although the attempt was unsuccessful, the attacker severely injured the flight crew.

Additionally, the aircraft underwent extreme stress as the injured crewmembers tried to disorient the attacker by rolling and inverting the DC-10 far beyond its design limits. For more information on this incident, watch this episode of Mayday: Air Disaster featuring the story of Flight 705.   

Because of its history, efforts are underway to save N306FE from the graveyard. A petition on change.org is quickly gaining traction, as it is close to obtaining 10,000 signatures. Organizers hope to preserve the aircraft in an aviation museum in tribute to the bravery demonstrated by the flight crew of Flight 705.

The End of an Era

49606334386 ce22b9f80c h
A Northwest Airlines DC-10 Lands | IMAGE: Boschh Via Flickr

Although the DC/MD-10 will no longer grace the world’s skies, except for the two MD-10s still in operation (and military KC-10 tankers), its memory will live on in the hearts and memories of aviators everywhere. The DC-10 will always hold a special place in the history of aviation.

The DC-10 retirement from FedEx’s fleet marks the end of an era. Still, its legacy will live on as a reminder of the aviation industry’s innovative spirit and engineering prowess.

Super Bowl 2023 Flyovers, the Best 5 Seconds in Football

0

It’s that time of year again, as 100 million people prepare to watch the Philadelphia Eagles battle the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl LVII tonight. And while flyovers of such highly televised games are common, they are nonetheless important and unifying, and arguably the best 5 seconds in football.

Even many players and coaches agree, flyovers are arguably the best part of the game, and everyone has their own reasons why.

Screen Shot 2023 02 12 at 1.39.57 PM
Super Bowl 2023 Flyovers, the Best 5 Seconds in Football 105

Click HERE to watch the above film, courtesy of NFL Films.

Tonight’s flyover by the U.S. Navy will be a little more special.

First All-Female Navy Crew to Conduct Tonight’s Big Flyover

Three U.S. Navy tactical squadrons are assigned to the flyover, aiming for an impressive 4-ship time-on-target display as the National Anthem comes to an end. And for the first time in history, the Navy flight crew are all women, as the Navy commemorates the 50th anniversary since a group of trailblazing women were first allowed to become naval aviators.

Foo18umWYBIIMuI
The fly-over team for Super Bowl LVII (left to right) – Lt. Arielle Ash of Abilene, Texas; Lt. Margaret Dente of North Salem, New York; Lt. Naomi Ngalle of Springfield, Virginia; Lt. Jacqueline Drew of Waltham, Massachusetts; Lt. Suzelle Thomas of Birmingham, Alabama; and, Lt. Kathryn Martinez, also of Springfield, Virginia (US Navy photos)

The 7 ladies will be flying two F/A-18F Super Hornets from the “Flying Eagles” of VFA-122, and a F-35C Lightning II from the “Warhawks” of VFA-97. They will be joined by an EA-18G Growler from the “Vikings” of VAQ-129.

Not only that, but all of the officers and most of the personnel who maintain the jets are women as well.

In 1973, eight women were first allowed to enter flight school. Six earned their wings, and Rosemary Mariner became the first woman to become a U.S. Navy fighter pilot.

Navy Rosemary Mariner.jpg
Navy Captain Rosemary Marine, the first woman to officially become a U.S. Navy fighter pilot (Naby photo)

Today, women make up about 15% of the Navy’s pilots.

“It’s not lost on me how special it is that I get to do what I’m doing today because they did it first,” said Lt. Peggy Dente, who will lead the flyover.

The big game starts at 6:30 p.m. ET.

The Flight of The Last B-36 Peacemaker

10

With the Retirement of the Peacemaker, the US Air Force Became an All-Jet Bomber Fleet.

On 12 February 1959, the last B-36J “Peacemaker” built, Air Force serial number 52-2827, departed Biggs Air Force Base, Texas, where it had been operational with the 95th Heavy Bombardment Wing. The aircraft was flown to Amon Carter Field in Fort Worth, Texas, where it was put on display. With the retirement of this last operational B-36, the United States Air Force Strategic Air Command was henceforth equipped with an all-jet bomber fleet.

B-36 in flight.
Image via USAF

The United States Air Force operated several versions of the Convair B-36 “Peacemaker” from 1949 to 1959. Unique in design, size, capability, and configuration, the B-36 is still the largest mass-produced piston-engine aircraft ever built. With a wingspan of 230 feet the B-36 had the longest wingspan of any combat aircraft ever built. With a range of 10,000 miles and a maximum payload of more than 43 tons, B-36 was capable of intercontinental flight without refueling.

The B-36 had an unsurpassed cruising altitude for a piston-driven aircraft, over 40,000 feet, made possible by its huge wing area and six 28-cylinder engines. The B-36 “featherweight’ configuration resulted in a top speed of 423 miles per hour at 50,000 feet altitude with the ability to fly at 55,000 feet for short periods.

B-36 in flight from a downward angle.
Image via USAF

Until the B-52 became operational, the B-36 was the only means of delivering the first generation Mark-17 hydrogen bomb. The Mark-17 was 25 feet long, 5 feet in diameter, and weighed a whopping 42,000 pounds, making it the heaviest and bulkiest American aerial thermonuclear device ever. Carrying this massive weapon required merging two adjacent bomb bays. The B-36 was the only aircraft designed to carry the T-12 “Cloudmaker,” a gravity bomb weighing 43,600 pounds and designed to produce an earthquake bomb effect.

The B-36’s maximum payload was more than four times that of the World War II-developed B-29, and actually exceeded the payload of the B-52. The B-36’s four bomb bays could carry up to 86,000 pounds of bombs, more than 10 times the load carried by the Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and substantially more than the entire B-17’s gross weight. Only more than ten years after the B-36’s retirement were American aircraft capable of carrying larger payloads than the B-36 when the Boeing 747 and Lockheed C-5 Galaxy went into production

B-36 duel wing engines.
Image via USAF

Each B-36 piston engine drove a 19 foot three-bladed propeller in a pusher configuration. These were the second-largest diameter propellers ever used to power a piston-engine aircraft. B-36 maintenance was as large an effort as the airplane itself. There were a total of 336 spark plugs in the six engines. At 7 feet, the wing roots were thick enough for a flight engineer to access the engines and landing gear during flight by crawling through the wings.

Similar to the B-29 and B-50, the pressurized flight deck and crew compartment were linked to the rear compartment by a pressurized tunnel through the bomb bay. In the B-36, movement through the tunnel was on a wheeled trolley, pulling on a rope. The rear compartment featured six bunks and a dining galley, aft of which was the tail turret.

B-29 and B-50 flying in formation.
Image via USAF

The NB-36H was modified to carry a 1 megawatt air-cooled nuclear reactor in the aft bomb bay, with a four-ton lead disc shield installed in the middle of the aircraft between the reactor and the cockpit. The highly modified cockpit was encased in lead and rubber, with a 1 foot thick leaded glass windshield to protect the crew from radiation.

NB-36H in flight.
Image via USAF

The lineage of the B-36 can be traced to early 1941. Concerned that the United States would be forced into the war and not have the ability to base aircraft in Europe, the United States Army Air Corps (USAAC) would need a new class of bomber which could reach Europe and return to bases in North America, necessitating a combat range of at least 5,700 miles, equal to a Gander, Newfoundland to Berlin round-trip flight.

NB-36H coming in for a landing.
Image via USAF

The Army Air Corps realized early in 1943 it needed a bomber capable of reaching Japan from its bases in Hawaii, and the development of the B-36 then resumed in earnest. The USAAF submitted a letter of intent to Convair, ordering an initial production run of 100 B-36s before the completion and testing of the two prototypes. The first delivery was planned for August 1945 and the last delivery in October 1946. Consolidated (by this time renamed Convair after merging with Vultee Aircraft in 1943) delayed the delivery schedule. The B-36 was rolled out on August 20th 1945, and flew for the first time on August 8th 1946.

Early prototype of the B-36.
Image via USAF

After the United States Air Force was born in 1947, strategists sought bombers capable of delivering the very large and heavy first-generation atomic bombs. The B-36 was the only American aircraft with the range and payload to carry the bombs from airfields on American soil to targets in the USSR. The modification to allow the use of the larger atomic weapons on the B-36 was called the “Grand Slam Installation.”

B-36 in flight over the United States.
Image via USAF

Convair referred to the B-36 as the “aluminum overcast”. While General Curtis LeMay headed Strategic Air Command from 1949 to 1957, he turned the B-36 fleet into an effective nuclear weapon delivery force through intense training and development. The B-36 formed the heart of the Strategic Air Command as its so-called “long rifle.”

“Six Turning, Four Burning”

Beginning with the B-36D, Convair added a total of four General Electric J47-19 jet engines. These were dual-mounted in pods outboard of the piston engines. The existing B-36 fleet was retrofitted to include the jet engines. Thus the classic B-36 slogan of “six turning and four burning” was born. The B-36 had more engines than any other mass-produced aircraft. The jet engines were primarily used during takeoff and for added speed over the target.

B-36D pictured with flight crew.
Image via USAF

The RB-36D was developed as a specialized photographic-reconnaissance version of the B-36D. The RB carried a crew of 22 rather than 15, the additional crew members flying along to operate and maintain the photographic reconnaissance equipment that was carried. The bomber’s forward bomb bay was replaced by a pressurized manned compartment carrying the cameras and a small darkroom. The second bomb bay contained photoflash bombs. The third bomb bay could carry an extra 3000 gallons (11,000 liters) of fuel in a droppable tank, which increased mission endurance to 50 hours. The fourth bomb bay carried electronic countermeasures (ECM) equipment.

Diagram of the cockpit of a RB-36D.

The RB-36D had an operational ceiling of 50,000 feet. Later, a lightweight version of this aircraft, the RB-36-III, could reach 58,000 feet. When the RB-36 was developed, it was the only American aircraft having enough range to fly over the Eurasian land mass from bases in the United States, and size enough to carry the bulky high-resolution cameras in use at the time. More than a third of all B-36 models were reconnaissance models.

RB-36D in flight.
Image via USAF

RB-36Ds began probing the boundaries of the Soviet Arctic in 1951. RB-36 aircraft operating from RAF Sculthorpe in England flew overflights of most of the Soviet Arctic bases, including the recently completed nuclear weapons test complex at Novaya Zemlya. RB-36s also performed a great number of rarely acknowledged (read SECRET) penetration reconnaissance missions into Chinese and Soviet airspace under the direct direction of Strategic Air Command General Curtis LeMay himself.

RB-36D prototype inside a development facility.
Last B-36. Image via USAF

Even though no B-36 ever dropped a single bomb on an enemy target, the airplane set the stage for the development of the aircraft and weapons systems that were to come online and eventually replace it during the 50s and 60s. Once the final B-36 was retired in 1959, Strategic Air Command utilized the Boeing B-47 Stratojet and B-52 Stratofortress. The Convair B-58 Hustler and the Rockwell B-1 Lancer were also Strategic Air Command jets when they came into service in 1960 and 1986 respectively.

B-36 on display.
B-26 at USAF Museum. Image via USAF

Enjoy this B-36 feature uploaded to YouTube by Mark Nobles.

[youtube id=”wwn1UYoGJgw” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]