Former Boeing Mgr Ed Pierson continues to call out Boeing leadership following a recent incident with an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 where a door-sized section of the plane came off in-flight.
He’s not backing down on his ongoing whistleblowing about problems with the 737 MAX, or systemic issues within Boeing’s leadership and aircraft manufacturing that he witnessed first-hand.
In the video above, Pierson discusses his views and experiences with Seattle’s KIRO 7 News Station. He also notes what he would do if he were in charge, to turn the company around and rebuild confidence within the public and aviation community.
Lots of unanswered questions
Alaska and United Airlines are the only two operators of Boeing’s 737 Max9s in the US. The FAA grounded all Max9s for inspections following the incident, where the door plug came off at around 16,000 feet, leaving a gaping hole in the jet, depressurizing the cabin and forcing an emergency return to Portland, Oregon. While there were some minor injuries, nobody was seriously hurt or killed, but it could have been much worse.
the door plug hole on an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 (Courtesy Elizabeth Le via Instagram)
The blown-off door plug on Flight 1282 was found in a residents backyard, without any of its 4 bolts attached. Perhaps they are laying in a field somewhere. Or, perhaps, they were never installed in the first place.
Since then, Alaska says they found “loose hardware” while inspecting other Max9s in their fleet. United also found “installation issues” with door plugs on their own Max9s. United also said they found bolts that needed tightening.
Perhaps even more worrisome, Alaska knew that exact plane was having issues, but it’s unclear if it’s related to the incident on Flight 1282. Other crews had reported pressurization warning lights on 3 prior flights, according to the NTSB. The plane wasn’t allowed to make long-hauls over open water, for fear of not having a runway nearby in case of an emergency.
Credit ntsb
The FAA has given checklists to operators to follow in their inspections. Max9s across the nation are grounded until operators “complete enhanced inspections which include both left and right cabin door exit plugs, door components, and fasteners”. The FAA has not yet signed off on a return to service plan.
Passengers describe terrifying incident
In an exclusive interview with Seattle Times, a mother who was seated near the blow-out discussed the terrifying incident.
Her teenage son was sitting at the front of the blow-out, herself in the middle seat next to him. A stranger had the aisle seat. The decompression sucked his shirt off and turned his seat. She and the other passenger both held onto him literally for dear life.
Alaska has since issued full refunds to all the passengers, as well as $1,500.00. They are also offering to pay for any therapy needed for the traumatic experience.
Whether that is enough to avoid a class-action lawsuit? Only time will tell.
NASA has pushed their first crewed Artemis moon mission to late 2025. The space agency announced the decision this week, citing numerous internal and external issues that will delay both Artemis-II and the first lunar landing on Artemis-III to late 2026.
NASA’s ambitions are more ambitious but still tech and funding limited
It’s important to understand Artemis isn’t a Cold War-era, trillion-dollar Apollo flex to plant flags on the high ground. NASA wants a permanent human presence in lunar orbit and on the surface at the moon’s South Pole.
NASA can’t send humans to Mars or elsewhere, without knowing how to live and work on the moon first. In order to do that with the agency’s sadly small budget, they have partnered with private industry.
spacex starship test vehicle atop the company’s “super heavy” rocket, which itself is also still early in development. Photo: mike killian / americaspace.com and avgeekery.com
SpaceX’s Starship lander isn’t even close to ready for Artemis-III
One big driver for the new schedule is SpaceX. NASA awarded them a $4.2 billion contract to provide the lander for Artemis-III and IV. But they’ve only launched their Starship prototype twice, and it has yet to achieve orbit. As early flight tests, nobody expects a flawless success, it’s just how aerospace development goes. However, every setback will only delay the first Artemis landing further. The development of Starship is not far enough along to support an Artemis-III landing by 2025.
NASA however is not driven by schedule, it is driven by crew safety. Simply put, NASA will not launch Artemis crews to the moon, until they are absolutely confident that everything has been tested to their satisfaction, proven repeatedly in-flight, and ready to carry astronauts.
In-Orbit Ballet or Logistical Nightmare?
ABOVE: Watch Elon discuss Starship as a fundamental part of Artemis
BELOW: Elon’s full update this week on SpaceX, including Starship development & next flight tests
Elon’s vision for Starship support of Artemis is complex. In addition to launching the largest crewed vehicles ever, it will also require a logistical ballet in space. The current plan includes on-orbit refueling for Starship to both land on the moon and launch back off it.
A “tanker” Starship would launch to low-Earth orbit (LEO) first. There it would park while waiting for the lander vehicle to launch on a separate launch.
Illustration of starship orbital refueling (spacex)
Once the lander launches, it would then dock with the orbiting tanker to refuel. It’s known as cryogenic propellant transfer, and it has never been done in microgravity before.
SpaceX will actually begin testing such fuel transfer on their next Starship flight test, IFT-3 (Integrated Flight Test 3), which could launch as soon as Feb. Their goal on IFT-3 is achieve orbit, and demonstrate transfer of 11 tons of cryogenic propellant between tanks in Starship.
This week Elon also said they hope to “soft land” an un-crewed Starship on the moon in 2025.
Credit spacex
Earlier this month, NASA said SpaceX is “making tremendous progress,” but added that “it’s extremely challenging to make that propellant transfer and Earth departure sequence work for us.”
The first launch of super heavy and starship (mike killian / americaspace.com / avgeekery.com)
After refueling in LEO, the Starship would undock, and then light its engines to break away from Earth’s gravitation pull and enter translunar injection.
The Artemis crew will then launch on the SLS from Kennedy pad 39B in Florida, and dock with the fully-fueled Starship in lunar orbit, and use it to land on the moon. When ready to leave, they will board Starship again and launch back to lunar orbit to rejoin Orion.
Orion and starship docking in lunar orbit (Render by Tony Bela via x, with permission)
NASA wants to see 20 successful Starship flights, before trusting it with their crews to land on the moon
The plan is extremely complex with many technical challenges that have never been strung together in a single mission. SpaceX has two years to have Starship ready Artemis-III, or the mission will just slip further.
A few successful missions won’t convince NASA that Starship is ready for human spaceflight either. The space agency wants to see roughly 20 successful flights before they will be confident in Starship as a lunar lander.
Falcon-9 / dragon launch for nasa (mike killian / americaspace.com)
SpaceX has succeeded over the last decade in proving their other vehicles are human-ready. NASA demanded similar requirements for their Falcon-9 rocket and Dragon spacecraft, before ever putting their astronauts onboard for trips to and from the International Space Station (ISS). It took SpaceX a number of years, before any crew ever stepped onboard.
Starship’s launch rocket isn’t ready yet either
Adding to the difficulty is the fact that SpaceX is still developing the new Super Heavy rocket for Starship. It’s not just the Starship that needs to prove itself before landing Artemis. It is also the rocket necessary to launch it to space.
Both the rocket and Starship are an intertwined system that are dependent on each other. Even with these challenges, SpaceX continues to build the required infrastructure necessary for the Starship system to support Artemis.
The second flight test of starship and super heavy (mike killian / americaspace.com / avgeekery.com)
Development, testing and flight tests continue in south Texas. SpaceX is also building the operational Starship/Super Heavy launch pad at Kennedy Space Center’s historic launch complex 39A in parallel. They are also building a second launch pad / tower in south Texas.
While the strategy is risky, SpaceX has proven itself capable even if it takes more time than promised. So far, SpaceX has flown NASA’s crews many times to the ISS safely and returned them to Earth without issue. Starship will likely get there too, but the company’s timelines are unrealistic. Analysts call it “Elon time” for a reason.
Artemis-1 flew a near-flawless mission, but engineers have to fix a few issues
NASA’s First Crewed Artemis Moon Mission Slips to Late 2025 14
Artemis-1 launched in late 2022 on an un-crewed flight test to lunar orbit and back. The new Space Launch System (SLS) rocket worked like a charm, exceeding performance expectations and delivering a near flawless launch and mission around the moon.
The SLS lifted off on almost 9 million pounds of thrust, hammering the launch pad and ground support infrastructure with a violent beating. Doors and panels were blown away, along with welds for hoses and several elevators and blast shields. You can read more about some of the damage and repairs in detail here.
see some of launch pad aftermath following artemis-1
NASA says repairs and modifications to the SLS mobile launcher and pad support infrastructure are underway and on track.
The Orion spacecraft performed almost perfectly on Artemis-1, accomplishing 161 test objectives (including 20 added mid-flight). Its service module generated 20% more power than NASA expected, and even used 25% less power than expected. Separation events such as jettison of the launch abort system and parachute deployment for splashdown occurred without issue. Orion landed within 2.4 miles of its targeted bullseye.
At 12:40 p.m. EST, Dec. 11, 2022, NASA’s Orion spacecraft for the Artemis I mission splashed down in the Pacific Ocean after a 25.5 day mission to the Moon. Orion will be recovered by NASA’s Landing and Recovery team, U.S. Navy and Department of Defense partners aboard the USS Portland.
There were a few vitally important issues…
However, a small part of Orion’s heat shield was unexpectedly liberated. While the vehicle was safe, the ablation was much more severe than expected in a few areas. Engineers are working to understand why.
The heat shield is a critical element that protects the crew from 5,000 degree F temperatures on re-entry. The capsule becomes like a fireball as it slams into the upper atmosphere. NASA says ablative material to help protect Orion on re-entry wore away differently than they had predicted.
Technicians working on orion’s heat shield (nasa photo)
Engineers are also assessing an, “issue where latching current limiters switched open without commanding several times throughout the mission. Engineers are reviewing flight data to understand the source of the issue and plan to conduct testing in a flight-like configuration.”
Artemis-1 validated the system can fly to the moon and back, but Artemis-II will validate critical environmental control and life support systems for crews. Testing since Artemis-1 has uncovered issues that NASA says require additional time to fix.
Artemis-II
Official crew portrait for Artemis II, from left: NASA Astronauts Christina Koch, Victor Glover, Reid Wiseman, Canadian Space Agency Astronaut Jeremy Hansen. Photo: nasa
“We are letting the hardware talk to us so that crew safety drives our decision-making. We will use the Artemis II flight test, and each flight that follows, to reduce risk for future Moon missions,” said Catherine Koerner, associate administrator, Exploration Systems Development Mission Directorate at NASA HQ.
The SLS core stage for Artemis-II has its 4 engines installed and will be transported to Florida this year. Same with the solid rocket booster segments. Orion’s heat shield will be applied to the spacecraft this spring. The Orion will then be connected to its service module for integrated testing.
watch the crew of artemis-2 conduct various training
“Artemis is a long-term exploration campaign to conduct science at the Moon with astronauts and prepare for future human missions to Mars. That means we must get it right as we develop and fly our foundational systems so that we can safely carry out these missions,” said Amit Kshatriya, deputy associate administrator of Exploration Systems Development, and manager of NASA’s Moon to Mars Program Office at headquarters. “Crew safety is and will remain our number one priority.”
Millions of people vacation at Walt Disney World Resort every year. But very few of them realize that when the park was first built, it had its very own airport – the happiest airport on Earth.
A quite infamous Disney World map from 1971 shows Disney airfield and its one northwest and southeast-bound runway. Passengers could catch a flight on Shawnee Airlines on a 19-seat DeHavilland DHC-6 Twin Otter. Shawnee Airlines flew directly into Disney’s STOLport from McCoy Airport in Orlando. It was a very short flight, just a few minutes in duration.
In October 1971, both Shawnee and Executive Airlines started flying regular routes to Disney on Twin Otters. Nonstop service to Orlando Herndon, Tampa, West Palm Beach, and Fort Lauderdale was offered by Shawnee. Executive operated two nonstop flights, to Orlando Herndon and Tampa.
The service to the happiest airport on Earth didn’t last long
Unfortunately, Executive Airlines did not last long and ceased operations in December 1971. By the summer of the next year, Shawnee started offering connections with major carriers after moving all operations to Orlando. A timetable from September 1972 lists six daily roundtrips between Disney and McCoy, along with connections to other cities. Shawnee’s nonstop flights from the resort to other cities were discontinued earlier that year.
Shawnee also shut down on 28 December 1972 due to a lack of passenger interest and rising debt. That was the end of the commercial airlines operating out of the STOLport. At the time Disney was built, management apparently thought the airport was a good idea, but alas, it was a failed experiment in the long run. In fact, Disney officials told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune that its shutdown would have little or no effect on the park’s operations.
By the early ’80s, a monorail extension to EPCOT Center had an elevated track on the west end of the runway that blocked larger planes from landing at the STOLport. Mickey Mouse One, Walt Disney’s own private plane, could not even touch down at the private landing field. Instead, World Drive was shut down to traffic so the corporate aircraft could land there and be towed back to the park so it could be displayed in the MGM boneyard.
Runway is used today, just not for airplanes
In 2006, the airstrip was in use again but not for traffic. WDW parked tractor trailers, buses and crates on the runway. A helicopter carrying a preparation team for then-President Bush landed on the airstrip and the monorail did not pose a problem. There are reports of company executives using the airstrip occasionally as well.
Sadly, the Walt Disney World airport is now defunct. After the attacks of 11 September 2001, the airspace over the resort became a protected no-fly zone. It is only a “temporary” flight restriction, but it has been in place for years. It is still fun to recall the early days of Disney when there was air traffic to and from the park, bringing wide-eyed children and their families to the Happiest Place on Earth.
NASA and Skunk Works Unveils Experimental Vehicle That Turns Sonic Booms Into Sonic Thumps
Are we on the verge of a commercial supersonic comeback? America’s space agency is determined to make it so by turning sonic booms into a mere whisper. Meet NASA’s X-59.
The 99 ft long purpose-built technology-demonstrator jet was rolled out today and formally introduced to the world. It could help change the future of supersonic aviation forever.
X-59 (Lockheed Martin / Garry Tice)
Five years of development with Skunk Works
The aircraft has been in development now for about 5 years. It was designed and built by Lockheed Martin at its famed Skunk Works in Palmdale, CA. NASA awarded LM a nearly $250 million contract for its development in 2018.
To understand why the technology in the X-59 is so important, it is important to understand some of the limitations and regulations around supersonic flight. Supersonic flight creates loud sonic booms. These booms not only sound like an explosion, they can damage windows and even buildings in some cases.
Nasa illustration of a future supersonic airliner, based on the research x-59 will do
Due to the potential hazards and annoyances, the federal government banned commercial flight over land over 50 years ago. The ban was strongly influenced by public opinion in cities where supersonic military jets were flown.
Simply put, residents didn’t like being startled or having their windows and walls rattling anytime a supersonic aircraft passed by.
Above, watch NASA and Skunk Works unveil the X-59
This limitation had an outsized impact on the evolution of commercial supersonic flight. Concorde gambled on supersonic travel being allowed over land, but was doomed as a profitable enterprise because of the ban. That’s also why we haven’t seen any supersonic commercial travel since the Concorde retired in 2003.
Turning sonic booms into sonic thumps
X-59 is the centerpiece of NASA’s bigger ‘Quesst’ mission, which again aims to turn sonic booms into barely noticeable thumps. The program’s goal envisions to make a giant sonic boom more like the sound of a car door closing from across a parking lot, equivalent to approximately 75 Perceived Level decibel (PLdB).
colorized schlieren image of a small-scale model of NASA’s X-59 Quiet SuperSonic Technology (QueSST) airplane taken inside NASA Glenn Research Center’s 8- by- 6-foot Supersonic Wind Tunnel during tests (photos nasa)
The jet’s unique shape spreads out the supersonic shockwaves. In wind tunnel tests, Schlieren images were taken of a X-59 model to give engineers visuals of the shock waves and their positions as air moved around it.
The model was put through several weeks of wind tunnel tests, producing encouraging results that matched computer models. All that was left was to build it.
Lockheed Martin Photo
The aircraft is powered by a single F414-100 GE engine. It’s mounted on top of the airframe, so that any shockwaves coming off it are directed away from the ground. It’s capable of reaching around 950 mph, with an anticipated cruising altitude of 55,000 ft.
X-59’s max gross weight is 25,000 lbs. it can carry 8,700 lbs of fuel and 600 lbs of payload. Skunk Works says it is capable of Mach 1.4.
Forward-facing Windows Prevent Quiet Supersonic Flight… So They Fixed That
Lockheed martin image
The X-59’s long skinny nose alone is almost 1/3 of the plane’s length. There’s no forward-facing window for the pilot either. That was one of the big design changes to reduce sonic booms, eliminating front-facing windows entirely. So how will they see where they are going?
The cockpit displays and lighting system includes a new NASA-developed External Vision System (XVS), displayed on the top screen. It gives the pilot a virtual window.
NASA test pilot, Nils Larson, inspects the X-59 cockpit displays and lighting system during system checkouts. nasa photo
A 4K monitor displays complex computer-processed imagery from two cameras mounted above and below the X-59’s nose.
The avionics flight displays, which show navigation information and status of the aircraft, are displayed on 2 screens below the XVS.
A close up of the camera from the X-59’s eXternal Vision System. This camera is on the top of the X-59, but there will also be one on the belly of the aircraft. (Nasa photo)
The jet’s 29.5-foot-wide wing holds the aircraft’s fuel systems and most of its control systems.
Test pilots have been using simulators at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center to train for the X-59.
Supersonic Comeback? Meet NASA’s X-59 Quesst 26
Lifting the ban for supersonic commercial flight over land
Throughout 2024, NASA will fly the X-59 supersonic over the test range at Armstrong Flight Research Center, to prove it can produce a quieter sonic thump and is safe to fly in the National Airspace System. More than 175 ground recording systems will measure the sound generated.
Starting in 2025, NASA will fly the X-59 over several large communities, to get their feedback. The space agency wants to survey what the public hears as it flies overhead. They will then share the data and reaction with law makers and regulators.
NASA test pilots Nils Larson (left) and Jim “Clue” Less (right), and Lockheed Martin test pilot Dan “Dog” Canin pose with the newly-painted X-59 (Nasa photo)
The hope is that the ban on supersonic commercial flight over land will be lifted, or at least establish acceptable commercial supersonic noise standards. Doing so would open a whole new market for air travel, and cut travel times in half. Projects like Boom Supersonic could become more commercially viable based on NASA’s efforts.
“It’s thrilling to consider the level of ambition behind Quesst and its potential benefits,” said Bob Pearce, associate administrator for aeronautics research at NASA HQ. “NASA will share the data and technology we generate from this one-of-a-kind mission with regulators and with industry. By demonstrating the possibility of quiet commercial supersonic travel over land, we seek to open new commercial markets for U.S. companies and benefit travelers around the world.”
You can be part of the first test flight
x-59 (lockheed photo)
NASA is inviting the public to sign up to get their own virtual boarding pass for the X-59’s first flight. Via NASA’s Flight Log experience, names will be put on a storage device that will be carried personally by the test pilot.
Participants will also receive a printable boarding pass, and the flight will be entered into their logbooks.
The best looking jet in the U.S. Navy recently joined a USAF U-2 spy plane over China Lake, making for a rare and very cool sight to behold. Check out these shots of Vandy-1 with a U-2!
Vandy-1 Recreates Iconic Shot With U-2 Spyplane 36
The flagship F/A-18 Super Hornet of Air Test and Evaluation Squadron Nine (VX-9 Vampires) was unveiled to the world last year. It is painted in an all black retro scheme to honor the storied past of VX test squadrons and VX-9’s 30th anniversary.
Harkens Back to a Different Era
Some might recall the old Vandy F-14s and F-4s with the slick black paint and Playboy bunnies on their tails.
Usn photo
Times back then were much less politically correct. The images of those old jets operating with VX-4 became some of the most iconic jet photos to ever hit press.
The USAF even once painted the infamous bunny logo on a Blackbird they designated the “Rapid Rabbit”.
Rapid rabbit. Photo: Lockheed Martin
The black bunny scheme originated in Pt Mugu, where VX-4 was based. Their call sign was “Vanderbilt”, and so all their jets were called Vandy. Vandy-1 was the commander’s jet and squadron flagship.
They put the logo on a few other non-black jets too. However, the black bunny versions were by far the most popular with the public and most widely seen.
usn photo
VX-4 was extinguished in the mid 90s and combined with VX-5 from China Lake, forming a new squadron VX-9 Vampires.
For a while, the jets swapped the bunny logo for test squadron markings. VX-9 had the logo for a short time on a standard grey Hornet, but the iconic bunny scheme soon vanished. The Navy put it back on the last F-14 ever produced, as a tribute on its final flights before retiring it in 2004.
Dod photo
The Vampires
The Vampires of VX-9 are responsible for a critical mission. They test and evaluate weapons and their related systems. Doing so ensures such capabilities are ready to integrate into the larger fleet.
The Vampires are based at Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, CA (NAWS), which encompasses over 1 million acres. VX-9 crews hold a broad-range of expertise, and are known for their ability to adapt to difficult and dynamic testing environments.
Photo credit avgeekery / mike killian
Recreating an old Vandy-1 formation with modern aircraft
Both the Air Force and Navy use airspace in southern CA and Nevada. They recently decided to pay tribute to an old formation of an F-4 Vandy-1 with a Blackbird. The difference now being modern aircraft.
Vandy-1 Recreates Iconic Shot With U-2 Spyplane 37
The new Vandy-1 joined an Air Force U-2 from the 412th Test Wing, based at Plant 42’s Air Force Life Cycle Management Center.
USN Lt Jonathan Newberry was assigned as the photographer, executing the sortie over NAWS.
Vandy-1 Recreates Iconic Shot With U-2 Spyplane 38
“This formation demonstrates the commitment to safe air range operations, while further reinforcing positive test partnerships for the warfighter,” noted the USAF release.
Vandy-1 Recreates Iconic Shot With U-2 Spyplane 39
VX-9 sent Vandy-1 to several air shows in 2023, and we expect the same for 2024. If you want to see Vandy-1 for yourself, follow AvGeekery on Facebook where we will share its travel plans.
Living in a Crash Pad is a Love / Hate Relationship
Everybody needs a place to crash, even pilots. It’s a terrible pun, but the crash pad lifestyle has removed much of the glamour that used to surround the flying profession.
Most pilots I discuss crash pads with behind the flight deck door view them as a necessary evil. Significant percentages of pilots and cabin crew members in the majors and regional airlines choose to live away from their bases.
Many factors drive this decision, but the one factor that comes up repeatedly on the flight deck is, “It’s the economy, stupid.”
Aircraft on Approach to LAX 24R
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of QOL
Right or wrong, the cost of living in the places where most airlines (major/regional) have established crew bases is one of the costliest places in America to work. New York City (DAL, UAL, AAL, JBL), San Francisco (UA/AAL), the list goes on SEA, FLL, BOS, LAX, DEN, ORD, etc, etc, etc.
Living near a large metropolitan area is always costlier, and just about every airline domicile is in one. Commute times, rent prices, taxes, and the amount of land or square feet in a home you can purchase are also significantly affected by living in these areas.
And let’s not forget that pilot pay and flight attendant pay have been subjected to numerous concessions since 9/11, until very recently. Many aircrew members lost significant percentages of their income in the recession, some lost their homes, and many have been impacted, especially at the regional level, where an entry-level First Officer was paid less to fly a jet aircraft than a worker flipping burgers at the same Seattle airport (due to local minimum wage laws – that did not apply to contract workers).
Departure Lounge in CYVR Vancouver, BC
The situation produced a significant income disparity between crew members at different levels. Regional crew members still had to subsist, pay rent, and operate out of expensive locations, while many crew members at the majors have decided to venture far afield from their domicile to find the best “QOL” quality of life for their families.
Most major companies have contractually adjusted their schedules to include a certain percentage of “commutable pairings,” which means that the start of a crew member’s trip is during the later morning or afternoon hours to allow a commute into domicile and that the trip concludes in domicile prior to the last flights leaving in the evening.
As you might imagine, most of these trips go to more senior crew members, and when it comes to commuting, “seniority really is everything.”
Enter the Crash Pad Mafia
Crash pads are the chosen way for airline crew members who want to or need to live “out of base” to have a cost-effective location to spend a night before or after a trip. Subsequently, the airline’s junior members will also spend 4-6 days at a time sitting reserve at their crash pad to make sure that your flight operates when a crew member calls in sick or can’t make it to the airport.
Reserve crew members spend the most time at the crash pad because getting a hotel room for 18-20 days out of the month is cost-prohibitive. The crash pad offers a ‘sensible’ alternative.
Exterior View of a SEA Airline Crew Crashpad
Crash pads typically come in two different flavors: Hot or Cold bunks. I know all you Navy avgeeks got a kick out of that phrase. The hot bunk style, as you may have guessed, allows any crew member who pays the monthly fee to select an open bunk (routinely lit by cell phone screen lighting in the middle of the night).
The cold bunk style is usually more costly and affords each crew mate the bed that they choose and pay for—some companies and proprietors have this down to a science. They even price-discriminate based on top/bottom bunks and the number of bunks in a room.
Part Animal House, Part MTV’s The Real World
It is strange to picture an apartment or large house teeming with adults of varying ages. No, there are no crazy party nights at the crashpads. If you want to listen to loud music, you’d better have your own earbuds.
Most social hours are spent in the living room or around the TV, discussing the latest contract dispute, TSA shenanigans, or emergency landing over takeout at the kitchen table.
Pad Common Area
As a crash padder, beware of the ‘spoiler alert’—there is always the risk of walking in on a padmate who is watching your favorite Netflix show but has fallen a few episodes behind on your seasonal binge.
You run screaming out of the house so you don’t hear or see anything. The next moment, you are back on the street with your luggage in tow, and you forgot it was raining. Yeah, it’s happened…and to me.
Most pads have rules catering to the rest and relaxation of fellow crew members, and in my experience, the best ones have more rules about etiquette, quiet hours (24/7), washing the dishes, limiting items in the fridge, and requiring squeegeeing the bathroom shower.
In some pads, cleaning and maintenance are the responsibility of the padmates. You even have to take your turn dusting or taking out the trash.
View from New York City’s Central Park East
Finding a shred of personal space eventually becomes a necessity. This summer, during my days at the crashpad, I spent hours exploring Lower Manhattan.
As my reserve shift neared its end, I took the Subway into the city and strolled through Central Park or the MET—the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art. Sometimes, a crew member invited me to the local gym, and other times, I just read a book. I needed that peace and quiet.
The best crash pads offer transportation options or are within walking distance of the airport. Some airlines require crew members to cover multiple airports in a major city, such as New York City, where pilots and flight attendants can typically be dispatched from Newark, Kennedy, or LaGuardia.
And when a pilot or flight attendant does have some downtime, the best pads are close to amenities like grocery stores, gyms, restaurants, a library, maybe the beach, a park, or, if you are really lucky, a laundromat.
Flying is a pretty awesome job. But it’s not always glamorous. If you need a crash pad, be smart and do your research. You’ll be glad you did.
A new CEO is taking over JetBlue and she will be the first woman in the country to lead a major U.S. airline.
Company President & COO Joanna Geraghty is taking over. Current CEO Robin Hayes is stepping down next month due to health reasons and after consultations with his family.
A New CEO is Taking Over JetBlue 48
“The extraordinary challenges and pressure of this job have taken their toll,” says Hayes. “On the advice of my doctor and after talking to my wife, it’s time I put more focus on my health and well-being.”
Hayes has led JetBlue since 2015. He’s worked to make America’s 6th largest airline (by revenue), through expanded partnerships and by setting in motion a plan to merge with Spirit Airlines.
The justice department shot down the existing North East partnership with American Airlines last year. The DOJ is also trying to tank the big merger that Hayes orchestrated to buy Spirit Airlines for nearly $4 billion.
Merger could reshape the airline industry
In 2022, JetBlue beat Frontier in a bidding war for Spirit. The Justice Dept, however, has their doubts if that’s good for the consumer. A trial was held last month in federal court to decide if the merger can move forward or not, but the judge has yet to issue his ruling.
If the deal is approved, JetBlue’s fleet will grow to 458 aircraft. The company will service more than 125 destinations in 30 countries. The merger would give them a stronger foothold in key markets like Orlando and Fort Lauderdale, where they will retain a support center.
Image: Avgeekery
The Spirit branding would disappear. JetBlue HQ would remain in New York. The combined carrier would grow to become America’s 5th-largest airline behind only American, Delta, United and Southwest. Those airlines control 80% of the domestic market. Frontier would then take Spirit’s place as the nation’s biggest ultra low cost carrier.
Change of Command
Geraghty has been President and COO of New York-based JetBlue since 2018. She will take over as CEO on Feb 12.
Photo: jetblue
Geraghty says she is “looking forward as we execute on our strategic initiatives, return to profitable growth, and generate sustainable value for shareholders.”
Current CEO’s parting thoughts
“I am deeply grateful for these many exciting years. I feel very lucky to have worked at an airline with a brand, culture and team that are simply unlike any other in the world,” added Hayes.
On April 14, 2004, I set out for my final overseas trip of my Air Force career in a C-37, a gleaming Gulfstream V. I had interviewed with Southwest Airlines one month earlier and was hoping to hear some results any day. Our eight-day trip retraced a lot of the same cities and bases I had flown to in October of 2001, the first trip after the 9/11 attacks. This time our customer was the new Special Operations (SOCOM) commander, Army General Doug Brown.
We made stops in Doha, Qatar, and Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, before flying over the mountain range into Bagram Air Base, 45 miles north of Kabul, Afghanistan. Employing a combat arrival technique at the time, we overflew the air base at 20,000 feet, then spiraled down, staying within the confines of the airfield in order to limit our potential exposure to shoulder-fired missiles or anti-aircraft gunfire. The base was a major installation for our Air Force and numerous coalition forces, with American F-16s and A-10s flying daily combat missions. After spending the night at Bagram Air Base, we departed the next day heading south towards Pakistan, before turning west towards Muscat, Oman, where I had flown KC-10 missions during Operation Desert Storm in 1991.
I got a job offer During My flight
As we flew over Pakistan, a datalink message arrived from our squadron duty officer telling me that someone from Southwest Airlines had called looking for me. I knew that had to be a good sign! With our satellite air phone on the aircraft, I called the squadron.
“Hey Dave. I thought you’d like to know that a lady named Mary called for you and asked you to call her back,” he said, passing along her Dallas office phone number. I thanked him for the message and told him that I’d return the call as soon as possible.
After hanging up, I told my copilot the news. He grinned and goaded me, “You should call her back right now.”
“You really think so?” I asked.
“Sure!” he replied.
Image by Tomás Del Coro via Wikipedia
I picked up the satellite-phone and dialed the 214-area code number. A lady from the Southwest People Department answered and said it was time for me to schedule a drug test. She couldn’t commit to the fact that I was hired, but this was the next step and meant that I had passed the interview process. Southwest was now wrapping up the final details before they could offer me a job.
I told her, “I’m currently out of the country, but I’ll take care of that as soon as I get back home.”
She asked, “Where are you right now?”
“Well, I’m currently flying over Pakistan,” I told her. Yes, I was showing off.
“Oh, that’s so cool!” she replied.
That was the end of a very happy but short conversation.
This was fulfilling the second part of my teenage dream. I told myself as a high school senior that I wanted to serve 20 years as an Air Force pilot and then fly for Southwest, my home-state airline.
An hour later, we landed at Seeb Airport, Muscat, Oman, for a night’s stay. The base had come a long way since the tent city of 1990 to 1991. The desert military installation now had hard-sided buildings, a vast collection of tan, rectangular single-story portable shelters, each with window air conditioners and generators humming away.
The next day, as our crew strolled around the crunchy gray gravel paths of the small base, I told an enlisted crew member that when she was nine I had lived for three months in one of fifty canvas tents alongside the runway.
High to a Low
That afternoon, on April 22, we departed for the westbound trip back to Florida. A few hours into the trip, in the dark skies over the Atlantic the general’s aide, an Army major, came back up into the cockpit, yelling, “Son of a bitch!”
I turned around, asking, “What’s wrong?”
“Pat Tillman has just been killed.” he answered.
Pat Tillman, NFL Player and Army hero killed by friendly fire in Afghanistan. Image: DoD
This was the night a firefight took the life of Pat Tillman, the Arizona Cardinal’s National Football League player who walked away from millions of dollars to become an Army Ranger immediately after the 9/11 attack. The unfortunate deadly shooting later turned out to be from our own troops, but on this still night over the ocean nobody knew the details of his death. Everyone thought it was an enemy ambush on our forces.
This was a somber, low point of a roller-coaster two-day period. What had started with the excitement of my potential hiring with Southwest Airlines now concluded with the death of a true American hero. Our cockpit was very quiet as we flew westward over the dark ocean.
This is the story of pioneering aviator Jackie Cochran’s record-setting flight in 1961.
On 22 April 1961, a sleek Lockheed L-1329 JetStar lifted off from New Orleans on a bold mission across the Atlantic. By the time it landed in Bonn, Germany, the jet had shattered 18 world records.
Jackie Cochran, circa 1943 | IMAGE: Public Domain
The Fédération Aéronautique Internationale (FAI) signed off on the achievements, and the US Centennial of Flight Commission later summed it up simply: the flight “set more speed and altitude records than any other pilot.” And the pilot? None other than Jacqueline “Jackie” Cochran, one of the most remarkable aviators of the 20th century.
Cochran was no stranger to firsts. In 1953, she became the first woman to break the sound barrier, flying a Canadair F-86 Sabre high above the California desert. That moment put her in the history books, right alongside her friend Chuck Yeager, who had done the same just six years earlier. A well-known photo captures the two of them together, two legends sharing a laugh. But Jackie’s story goes much deeper than one headline-grabbing flight. She was a racing champion, a record-setter, and later the first woman honored with a permanent display at the US Air Force Academy.
More Than Just Records
Jackie Cochran and Chuck Yeager being presented with the Harmon International Trophies by President Dwight D. Eisenhower. (Photo courtesy Air Force Flight Test Center History Office)
Jackie Cochran (center) with WASP trainees | IMAGE: Public Domain
Her influence wasn’t limited to records in the sky. During World War II, Cochran played a key role in organizing women to support the war effort from the cockpit. She pushed for the creation of the Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps (WAAC) and, more famously, the Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASP). These women ferried airplanes, trained male pilots, and took on vital behind-the-scenes flying jobs that freed men for combat. While they didn’t fly in battle, their contributions proved that women had a rightful place in aviation—a point Jackie fought for her entire career.
After the war, Cochran stayed connected to the military. She joined the US Air Force Reserve in 1948 as a lieutenant colonel and eventually rose to full colonel before retiring in 1970. She passed away a decade later, but her trailblazing work continues to inspire generations of aviators.
The airplane she used for her 1961 record run carried a fitting name: The Scarlett O’Hara. On the way to Bonn, the JetStar made stops in Gander, Newfoundland, and Shannon, Ireland, before completing its 4,300-mile journey. At the time, the idea of a business jet handling that kind of mission was revolutionary. And that’s where the JetStar program itself comes into the picture.
The JetStar Program Takes Off
Lockheed developed the JetStar in the mid-1950s to fill a gap in the market. Companies and military units needed something smaller than a commercial jet but faster and more capable than a prop-driven aircraft. The JetStar first flew in 1957, and its four rear-mounted engines gave it both power and style. It could cruise at over 500 mph—similar to a Boeing 707—but carried only eight to ten passengers in a roomy, executive cabin. For business leaders, military officials, and even a few celebrities, the JetStar was the perfect mix of speed, range, and comfort.
The program was a success. Between 1957 and 1978, Lockheed built more than 200 JetStars. Some went to the US Air Force, where they served as transport and utility aircraft. Others found their way into private hands. Elvis Presley, for example, owned two of them, further boosting the JetStar’s image as the jet of choice for those who wanted both power and glamour.
Still, Jackie Cochran’s flight in The Scarlett O’Hara stands out as one of the JetStar’s defining moments. Her record-setting trip showcased exactly what this new class of business jet could do. Later, that very aircraft was acquired by NASA for research and testing before being retired to the Joe Davies Heritage Airpark in Palmdale, California. Today, visitors can walk up to the jet and imagine what it must have been like for Jackie to push it across the Atlantic at record speeds.
A Legacy That Still Inspires
In the end, Cochran’s 1961 JetStar flight wasn’t just about numbers on a chart. It marked the beginning of a new era in aviation—an era where business jets could cross oceans, where women could lead from the cockpit, and where pushing boundaries was part of the job. Jackie Cochran’s courage and vision made her one of aviation’s great pioneers.
The JetStar flown by Cochran on her record setting flight in 1961 was acquired by NASA and is now on static display at the Joe Davies Heritage Airpark, in Palmdale, Calif.
One of the best aviation videographers out there, Spencer Hughes, caught the Navy’s Blue Angels arriving in the Mojave desert yesterday to begin winter training. Watch the Blue Angels arrive at El Centro below.
video shot and edited by Spencer hughes
Flying inches apart at several hundred mph in combat fighters is no easy feat. It may look that way from the ground, but that’s because the crews practice and fly daily. During Winter Training, it’s not uncommon to see them fly multiple sorties a day.
A busy 10 weeks ahead
Team at nas pensacola (photo via blue angels)
The precision flying team departed their home base at NAS Pensacola, FL on Jan 4. El Centro is the ideal training location for them, due to the desert’s dry air and predictably calm sunny weather. For the next 10 weeks, they will practice their formations and demo, and slowly bring the formations in closer as the winter progresses.
The 4-ship diamond will do their practices, followed by the two solos. Each will be flying 6 days a week practicing over the desert, flying multiple sorties daily as they build their air show demonstration for millions of spectators nationwide in the year ahead.
Team over el centro (photo via blue angels)
“We travel to 32 air show sites a year putting on air shows and executing outreach events in the hopes that we can showcase what the Navy and Marine Corps represents, and hopefully inspire some folks to potentially join us,” said BOSS, the Commanding Officer of the team Alex Armatas, who is flying as #1 for his second year.
Trust is not just a word or an idea for the team, it is literally their life. Over the next 3 months they will build that bond which helps them execute such impressive flying. In some maneuvers they can’t even see each other, relying purely on radio calls and trust that each pilots does what they are supposed to.
Team arriving on jan 4 (navy photo)
Their first air show is scheduled to occur at El Centro in March. You can see their 2024 air show schedule here.
A B-1 Lancer crew is safe on the ground tonight, following ejection from their bomber at Ellsworth AFB in South Dakota.
Details are few, Air Force officials confirmed the crash occurred shortly before 6:00pm local. The bomber was attempting to land on the base after conducting a training mission.
USAF photo
“A board of officers will investigate the accident,” noted the base on social media. “Additional details will be provided as they become available. For questions regarding this incident, contact the 28th Bomb Wing Public Affairs Office at (605) 385-5056, or by e-mail at 28bw.public.affairs@us.af.mil.”
We’ll update as details come out.
Not the first B-1 to crash from Ellsworth
Two squadrons of B-1s operate out of Ellsworth. A number of their giant bombers, affectionately known as the BONE, have crashed since the 1980s, or had serious incident. One crash in 1988 also saw that crew eject safely while landing.
Usaf photo
Other Ellsworth BONE crews have not been as lucky. One crew crashed in 1997 over Montana. All were lost.
In both instances, pilot error was to blame. Another incident occurred over Montana again in 2013, but the crew ejected safely. Another Ellsworth B-1 was lost in 2001 after taking off from the Indian Ocean for a combat mission in Afghanistan. They too ejected safely and were rescued by the U.S. Navy.
An Ellsworth BONE had a mid-air collision with a refueling tanker in the early 90s (both planes made it back to base). Another burst into flames in Guam in 2005 while taxiing. In both instances the crew were ok.
Sun is setting on the B-1
The sun is setting on the B-1 Lancer. The USAF is bringing online their next generation stealth bomber to replace it, the B-21 Raider, which you can read about here.
AMERICA’S FIRST B-21 STEALTH BOMBER UNVEILED ON DEC 2 (PHOTO: USAF)
Northrop Grumman has been developing the new bomber now for years. Six aircraft are currently in various stages of production and testing, and flight testing is currently underway in Southern California. Development has been highly classified.
In the 1960s, the USAF operated two XB-70 Valkyries. The Valkyrie remains the world’s fastest bomber to ever fly. Each surpassed Mach 3, conducting research to test aerodynamics, propulsion, and other characteristics of large supersonic aircraft.
Each test vehicle flew many times. One of the XB-70 Valkyries tragically crashed later in the program. Before that incident, there were other challenges. Here’s the story of how one of the XB-70s avoided what could have been a disaster thanks to a team of engineers and a pilot with a paperclip.
Background of the XB-70 Valkyrie: A program that never was
North American XB-70A Valkyrie. Image via USAF
The idea for the XB-70 Valkyrie was conceived in the 1950s. At the time, the US Air Force wanted a Mach 3 high-altitude bomber with a nuclear strike capability. Within a few years after conception though, the invention of Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs) and nuclear-armed ICBMs convinced the USAF to cancel the XB-70 Valkyrie program. No production craft were completed or flown.
However, the USAF ordered two jets from North American as test platforms for research purposes. The first XB-70 Valkyrie (AV-1) flew in Oct 1964, followed by the second (AV-2) in July 1965. Sadly, the second test vehicle was lost in a mid-air collision a year later with an F-104.
North American XB-70A Valkyrie just after collision. Note the F-104 is at the forward edge of the fireball and most of both XB-70A vertical stabilizers are gone. (U.S. Air Force photo)
AV-1 continued flying research, but was transferred to NASA in 1967 to support the National Supersonic Transport Program. NASA handed the remaining XB-70 Valkyrie over to the National Museum of the USAF in 1969, where it is on display today in Dayton, OH.
XB-70 Valkyrie Problem Occurred Immediately on Takeoff
Before the tragic accident in the summer of 1966, AV-2 had another potentially catastrophic issue. On 30 April 1966, USAF Col Joe Cotton and North American test pilot Al White took off in AV-2 from Edwards Air Force Base. Their mission was to hit Mach 3 for 30 minutes.
With 6 engines and 168,000 pounds of thrust, they roared down the runway for departure, but it wasn’t long before a problem popped up. The nose gear was jammed. They had a short-circuit in the landing gear retraction system.
Cotton (top left) and white (top rifht). Usaf photos
The 500,000-pound plane’s nose gear was blown back into the half-retracted gear well door, and the tires were also slashed. When they tried to lower the gear, they couldn’t because the hydraulic system failed. Even the backup electrical system for the gear was useless.
Landing a Cessna or Bonanza without nose gear is one thing. You’ll probably walk away from that. But doing it in a Valkyrie would likely be suicide. Without nose gear, the crew would be unlikely to survive due to the plane’s nose-up attitude and underbelly structure.
North American XB-70A Valkyrie with Convair TB-58A chase aircraft. Note singed paint from sustained supersonic speeds. Image via USAF
Conventional attempts to fix it didn’t help, time for Plan B
They decided to try some hard touch-and-gos, hoping to knock the tire back into its locked position so they could land safely. It didn’t work. They were flying for an hour trying to find a solution, and they were running out of options other than to bail out and lose the plane and possibly their lives.
Fortunately, engineers on the ground determined the problem and advised the crew to short-circuit the electrical system. So Cotton reached into his briefcase and pulled out a paperclip. He simply used it to reach in and short-circuit the breaker.
The problems weren’t over yet for the XB-70 Valkyrie
With the nose gear down and locked, Cotton and White brought AV-2 in for landing. On touchdown, 3 of the 4 main landing gear locked up, igniting in flames under the belly of the plane as it deployed its drag chutes. The jet came to a stop in spectacular fashion, but the crew and the plane survived to fly another day. Here’s the kicker… a paperclip saved a $750 million aircraft. Eat your heart out, MacGyver.
A paperclip saved a $750 million aircraft. Eat your heart out MacGyver.
“I am convinced we would have broken the plane to pieces if we had tried to land without the nose gear locked into position,” said White.
Cotton with av-2 (usaf)
Cotton too recalled the day. “I’m sure anybody could have gimmicked up something to short across between the terminals, if they had the motivation I had.”
