Home Blog

Southern Airways Flight 49: Hijacked, Shot At, and Forced to Take Off Without Tires

Southern Airways Flight 49 became one of aviation history’s most extraordinary hijackings, sending a DC-9 across multiple countries during a tense 30-hour saga.

Demonstrating its ruggedness, endurance, and reliability, the McDonnell-Douglas DC-9, one of the original short-range, low-capacity twinjets along with the Sud-Aviation SE.210 Caravelle and the British Aircraft Corporation BAC-111, was subjected to a more than 30-hour hijacking that took it from Canada to Cuba and numerous US cities in between.

Southern Airways Flight 49 Captain William Haas
Captain William Haas
Harold Johnson, First Officer of Southern Airways Flight 49
First Officer Harold Johnson

Piloted by Captain William R. Haas and First Officer Harold Johnson, the aircraft was commandeered on a multi-sector flight from Memphis to Miami with intermediate stops in Birmingham, Montgomery, and Orlando on 10 November 1972.

Accommodating 75 passengers, who were attended to by two cabin personnel—Karen Ellis and Dionna Holman—aircraft 904, operating as Flight 49, departed Memphis International Airport (MEM) at 1810 local time and routinely made the short hop to Birmingham (BHM), where it landed at 1850, disgorging 45 passengers, before redeparting for the 15-minute sector to Montgomery (MGM).  It would never arrive.

As it began its descent from 10,000 feet, a black man rose from his seat and forced his way into the cockpit with a gun instead, demanding, “Head north, captain!  This is a hijacking!”

Unable to reach any destination of any considerable distance, the aircraft was forced to divert to Jackson Municipal Airport (JAN) in Mississippi, first to refuel.  During the brief flight, at which time it was determined that there were actually three hijackers on board who were later identified as Melvin C. Cale, Henry D. Jackson, and Louis Moore, the male passengers were ordered to remove all but their shorts so that they could be sure that they concealed no firearms, after which the flight attendants were instructed to serve beverages to reinitiate some degree of normality.

Landing on JAN’s Runway 15L shortly after 2000 local, the DC-9-10 decelerated and remained on it as a lone attendant refueled it, and then departed once again at 2035, now bound for Detroit, both destination and target of the hijackers’ rage.

Demands, Diversions, and Rising Tension

Newspaper article from 11 November 1972 regarding the Southern Airways Flight 49 hijacking

During the subsequent climb, their motive was revealed. Having been unfairly treated in the Michigan city, racially profiled, and arrested for crimes that they claimed that they did not commit, they now sought revenge.  Yet to minimize tension in the cabin, they instructed the two flight attendants to serve the catered dinner of salad, steak, and potatoes, which they themselves consumed, along with copious amounts of alcoholic beverages.  These apparently calmed them to the point where they were persuaded to permit the passengers to redress.  What could now be considered “routine” inside the aircraft, however, did not extend to the conditions outside of it.

Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (DTW) had closed due to heavy rain and fog, and when the DC-9 reached the area, it was forced to circle.  It was during this time that the hijackers stated their demands, reduced to ten and ten—that is, $10 million and ten parachutes.

But two hours of circling resulted in no weather improvement and only depleted fuel, forcing it to divert to nearby Cleveland Hopkins International Airport (CLE), where the ransom money, the parachutes, and stimulants to keep the crew alert could be flown for transfer to the hijacked DC-9.

Landing at 0100, the aircraft was refueled, but was informed that the one carrying the supplies, which would originate in Chicago, would not arrive in CLE for at least two more hours.  Beginning to feel betrayed, the hijackers lost all trust when they glimpsed seven figures approaching the DC-9, despite emphatic orders to the contrary, and ordered it to take off immediately.

Already poised on the runway’s threshold with its engines running the entire time, it accelerated, and Captain Haas rotated it, enabling it to climb skyward.  It was ordered to set course for Toronto.

A Long Night Over North America

Route map showing the convoluted journey of Southern Airways Flight 49
IMAGE: Manhattan Project National Park

The supply plane had intermittently taken off from Chicago and set its own course for the Canadian destination, where it landed at 04:31. The Southern DC-9 maintained a circular holding pattern until that had occurred and was thus able to land on Runway 5R at Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ), parking at its threshold with its engines running.

Control tower personnel, attempting to fatigue the hijackers, delayed the dispatch of the fuel truck, prompting tense, tedious bargaining that soon erupted into impatient fury.  They threatened to return to the sky if the truck were not immediately available, but with only 7,300 pounds of fuel on board, they would not have even been able to reach the US border.    

At 0537, it finally materialized, but their now mollified temper just as quickly reignited. The fuel truck attendant, instructed to wear nothing but a bathing suit and bring the mounting list of supplies, which now included food, water, coffee, and the stimulants, only carried the money, in the amount of $500,000, transported from Chicago, while the remaining items were not to be found. Perhaps the greatest anger-feeding fact, however, was the discovery that the money had not been provided by the city of Detroit, which the hijackers deemed the rightful rectifier of their injustices. Instead, it had been supplied by Southern Airways itself.

Unsatisfied, they once again ordered the aircraft airborne, which occurred at 0615, and it headed south for what was intended as its longest sector, a southern one to a destination they believed was the only one where they could achieve full satisfaction: Cuba.

Because the aircraft lacked the range to cover such a distance, it briefly landed in Lexington, Kentucky, at 0935, only to take off again 20 minutes later.

When negotiations for the $10 million once again failed, the three hijackers threatened to crash the airplane into the Atomic Energy Commission facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and it was not until the early afternoon that a Learjet carrying the demanded ransom money touched down at Chattanooga’s Lovell Field (CHA), enabling the Southern DC-9 to follow closely on its heels 35 minutes later.  The requested fuel truck, again operated by a lone attendant, approached the aircraft with the long list of provisions that now included buckets of fried chicken, sandwiches, soft drinks, coffee, tea, beer, stimulants, bullet-proof vests, and riot helmets, enabling him to pass them to the first officer through his right cockpit window.

Once refueled, the aircraft retook off and climbed to 21,000 feet, where the hijackers popped the stimulants into the crew members’ mouths. It was later revealed that they were only made of sugar. Yet the elusively delivered ransom money once again proved unsatisfactory, because it was learned that it had once again come from the airline itself.  Proving that they sought revenge more than the monetary reward, they freely distributed it to the crew and the passengers. It failed to serve their purpose.

Maintaining a southeasterly course at 33,000 feet, the DC-9 overflew Georgia and Florida and eventually passed out over the Caribbean Sea, reaching Cuban airspace at 1600 local time on 11 November and landing on Runway 5 at Havana’s José Martí International Airport (HAV) 50 minutes later.

Havana, Orlando, and a Desperate Escape

1024px Southern Airways DC 9 6222465168
Image: By clipperarctic from Wikimedia Commons

After it had parked, Jackson, who believed he would be granted sanctuary by Fidel Castro, disembarked and spoke to a local official, who claimed that Castro himself was unavailable (though he was actually in the tower, observing the situation the whole time).

Surmising that he would not be given the friendly welcome he had envisioned, he reboarded the aircraft and demanded sufficient fuel for an escape, but it was not quickly provided, and only after the first officer himself had deplaned to supervise the refueling was it able to take off at 1900 — 21 hours into its ordeal.  

Making the short hop to Key West, Florida, to top off its tanks at the Boca Chica Naval Air Station, it was once again in the air, the hijackers now announcing its new destination, which they believed would provide the sanctuary that Cuba had not been able to: Switzerland.

The DC-9-10’s range was only about 1,500 miles, while the Atlantic stretched for more than twice that.  If it continued on its present course, Captain Haas explained to the hijackers, it would run out of fuel, ditch into the ocean, and all would fall prey to shark pools, even if they survived the actual plunge into the water. He ultimately convinced them to return to Orlando, where they could transfer to a long-range, quad-engine Air Force jet, suitably equipped with overwater navigation, crossing the Atlantic by way of New York, Newfoundland, Ireland, and Great Britain.

The DC-9 landed at Orlando’s McCoy Jetport (MCO) at 2115, a landing that would later prove to be the beginning of the end.  

A Final Flight and an Impossible Landing

Southern Airways Flight 49
Southern Airways Flight 49: Hijacked, Shot At, and Forced to Take Off Without Tires 12

A fuel truck parked at its end, and for the first time since the ordeal had started the previous evening, the hijackers permitted the engines to be turned off to accept their vitally needed fuel, one at a time.

Invisible to the hijackers because of the darkness, however, FBI agents had positioned themselves on parallel Runway 36L, and they began shooting at the DC-9’s tires in order to incapacitate it.  The hijackers themselves retaliated, opening the cockpit windows and returning fire.

Now with the firm conviction that they had been betrayed, they ordered First Officer Johnson to stand up and pumped a bullet into his right arm, and then demanded that the captain take off, despite the tire damage and Johnson’s wounded condition.

What they demanded, Haas felt, was impossible, if not suicidal.  Nevertheless, virtually assured death by the grenade held only inches from his face, he was left without choice or even reason: he advanced the throttles.

Jolting down the runway at ever-mounting speed and spitting fire-threatening sparks, the twinjet slowly and sluggishly accelerated, its metal rims, like flints, becoming glowingly hot and ejecting rubber shards from the no-longer existent tires that were ingested by the engines. Rotating, during which the nose wheel was elevator-coaxed off the surface, the DC-9 sat on its main wheel rims before, impossibly, taking to the sky, surmounting friction and speed, then disappearing into the darkness, left only briefly visible until its anti-collision lights disappeared.

Survival in Havana and Lasting Consequences

Southern Airways Flight 49 Newspaper article
Southern Airways Flight 49: Hijacked, Shot At, and Forced to Take Off Without Tires 13

During its climb out, the hijackers plotted their next course of action, considering the reception they had received in both Havana and Orlando and concluding that the former had been decidedly friendlier than the latter.  It was therefore to the former that they now elected to go.  It would, without question, be the aircraft’s final destination, and many elements indicated that it would not necessarily be safely reached.

No tires remained on the main wheels, leaving only friction—and potentially fire—causing metal-to-surface contact. One of the engines was severely low on oil, and some of its fan blades had been bent by the ingested rubber. The first officer was bleeding, in pain, and only half-conscious.  The aircraft could not be pressurized, leaving it to cruise at altitudes no higher than 10,000 feet.  The two pilots, malnourished and dehydrated, had not slept for 48 hours and had been pushed to their emotional, physical, and psychological limits, having been under the constant threat of death.  And they now faced their second landing in a communist country with an incapacitated airplane.

Aware of Flight 49’s return, Castro ordered that the airport be prepared for its emergency landing and alerted hospitals of the imminent arrival of the wounded.  But even foaming the runway would not aid the situation: there was insufficient substance available to do so.

As the flight attendants prepared the passengers for the landing, the hijackers, for the first time, realized the severity of the situation they had created.  While they had continually threatened the safety and lives of everyone on board, they were now in the same situation, and their weapons could do nothing to resolve it. They symbolically surrendered them to the two attendants as verification of this fact.

Screen Shot 2026 03 13 at 5.27.31 PM

At 2315, the lights of Havana became visible through the cockpit windows.  Although flight deck instrumentation indicated that the landing gear had successfully extended, Captain Haas was unsure whether it was in the locked position due to damage sustained during the Orlando shootout and takeoff, prompting him to descend to 300 feet and request visual tower verification.  He also lowered a periscopic device in the passenger cabin to further verify their position.

Approaching HAV’s 12,000-foot-long, light-lined Runway 23, the passengers now in their crash positions, the twinjet shed its remaining altitude and passed over its threshold.  The engines were throttled back, and the ear-piercing emission from its Pratt and Whitney JT8D turbofans died down.

miami

Flaring, the aircraft settled onto the concrete with its main wheel metal rims, from which sparks and smoke erupted upon contact. Violently jolting, it settled and decelerated until the aircraft was drained of its momentum and came to a full stop, enabling the passengers to evacuate through the overwing emergency exits, which had been opened before touchdown, and leave the aircraft for the first time in some 29 hours. The molten metal was doused with fire-retarding foam.

All miraculously survived, despite some injuries. The hijackers were arrested.  The captain was met by Fidel Castro, who gave him a bear hug.  The first officer was carried off the aircraft in a stretcher, and he, along with the wounded passengers, was taken to the city’s hospital, while the remainder of the passengers and crew members were treated to a dinner in the terminal.

Screen Shot 2026 03 13 at 5.28.19 PM

The three hijackers served eight years in a Cuban prison in cells that Castro described as “four-by-four-by-four foot” in dimension, but all were subsequently extradited to the United States. Cale and Moore served an additional 20 years there, while Jackson served another five over that for his shooting of the first officer.

As a result of the 30-hour ordeal, the FAA implemented tighter security measures at 531 domestic airports, resulting in the mandatory screening of all passengers, crew members, and their luggage. Flight crews were also rigidly trained for skyjacking situations.  Relations with Cuba temporarily improved, since Castro demonstrated that he would accept no tolerance for such attempts and refused to grant any immunity or freedom to those who sought sanctuary by employing such extreme methods.

Both the crew’s expertise and the DC-9’s design integrity were credited with ensuring the passengers’ ultimate safety and survival. Although the circumstances the Southern Airways one was subjected to exceeded those for which it had been certified, it demonstrated two of its original design goals—namely, ruggedness and reliability. And while the hijackers’ original purpose of alerting the world to the alleged injustices that occurred in the City of Detroit was successful, the way in which they sought to do so—inflict the same treatment on innocent others that they were allegedly subjected to—only resulted in their own loss of freedom.

Southern Airways Flight 49 newspaper article
Southern Airways Flight 49: Hijacked, Shot At, and Forced to Take Off Without Tires 14

KC-135 Crash in Iraq Claims the Lives of Six US Airmen After Apparent Midair Collision

UPDATE | 10PM EDT | 14 MAR 2026: The Department of War has released the names of the six United States Air Force Airmen who were killed in Thursday’s midair collision over western Iraq while supporting Operation Epic Fury.

Assigned to the 6th Air Refueling Wing, MacDill Air Force Base, Florida:

Maj. John A. Klinner, 33, of Auburn, AL; Capt. Ariana G. Savino, 31, of Covington, WA; and Tech. Sgt. Ashley B. Pruitt, 34, of Bardstown, KY.

Assigned to the 121st Air Refueling Wing at Rickenbacker Air National Guard Base, Ohio:

Capt. Seth R. Koval, 38, of Mooresville, IN; Capt. Curtis J. Angst, 30, of Wilmington, OH; and Tech. Sgt. Tyler H. Simmons, 28, of Columbus, OH.

They were tanker Airmen. The ones who quietly extend the reach of every mission and every aircraft flying in defense of freedom. Today, we pause to remember six patriots who answered the call, took to the sky, and gave everything in service to their country.

The original story is below.


A KC-135 crash in western Iraq after an apparent midair collision has killed six US Airmen, US Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed Friday. Investigators are now examining what happened.

Six American service members were killed Thursday, 12 March 2026, after a US Air Force (USAF) KC-135 Stratotanker crashed in western Iraq following an incident involving another aircraft, according to the US military. The crash occurred during operations connected to the ongoing US and Israeli campaign against Iran, known as Operation Epic Fury.

US Central Command (CENTCOM), which oversees American military operations in the Middle East, confirmed on Friday that all six crew members on board had died. Earlier, reports mentioned four deaths while rescue teams searched for the other two. By early Friday morning, however, officials confirmed that all six had died.

“The circumstances of the incident are under investigation,” CENTCOM said in a statement. “However, the loss of the aircraft was not due to hostile fire or friendly fire.”

The military said the incident occurred in “friendly airspace” and involved two aircraft during Operation Epic Fury. One aircraft crashed in western Iraq, while the other was able to land safely.

The aircraft that went down has been identified as Boeing KC-135R Stratotanker (62-3556). The tanker was historically assigned to the Air Force Reserve’s 459th Air Refueling Wing at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

A US official familiar with the incident said the second aircraft involved was also a KC-135. Military officials later identified it as KC-135R (63-8017), an airframe delivered in 1963. The tanker reportedly suffered damage to its tail during the incident but remained controllable and landed safely. Reports indicate the aircraft diverted to Tel Aviv, where it landed safely. Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter wrote on X that the aircraft had landed safely in Israel.

Photographs of the surviving aircraft show markings associated with the 940th Operations Group at Beale Air Force Base in California, part of the 940th Air Refueling Wing. The unit operates a small fleet of KC-135 Stratotankers and received its first aircraft of the type in December 1976.

KC-135 crash damage
KC-135 Crash in Iraq Claims the Lives of Six US Airmen After Apparent Midair Collision 19

According to CENTCOM, this crash raises the number of US service members killed in the current conflict with Iran to at least 13.

An Aging Fleet Essential to the Success of Epic Fury

Boeing KC 135 J57 takeoffb
KC-135A Image via US Air Force

The KC-135 Stratotanker, the aircraft involved in the crash, has been a key part of the US military’s aerial refueling fleet for decades. Based on the Boeing 707 airliner, it entered service in the late 1950s and early 1960s and still plays an important role in helping military aircraft fly longer distances.

The KC-135 lets fighter jets, bombers, surveillance planes, and cargo aircraft refuel in midair. This helps them stay in the air longer and operate far from their bases. Some versions can also carry cargo or passengers, and the aircraft can support aeromedical evacuation missions.

A standard KC-135 crew usually consists of three people: a pilot, a co-pilot, and a boom operator. The boom operator manages the refueling boom, which extends from the back of the tanker and connects to other aircraft during refueling. On many KC-135s, the operator does this while lying face down and watching the process through a window on the bottom of the fuselage.

Some missions require additional crew members, which was the case here.

The Congressional Research Service reports that as of last year, the Air Force had 376 KC-135 aircraft. Of these, 151 were with active duty units, 163 with the Air National Guard, and 62 with the Air Force Reserve.

Even with upgrades, the age of the KC-135 has been a concern for defense analysts. The Air Force’s switch to the newer KC-46A Pegasus tanker is also taking longer than planned.

Even with the KC-46 coming into service, officials expect the Stratotanker to keep flying for many years. Some estimates say it could stay in use into the 2040s or later.

Refueling tankers have become particularly important during the current conflict, analysts say, as US aircraft may be required to conduct longer missions across the region.

Investigation Underway as (Many) Questions Remain

KC-135 crash survivor (airframe reg. 63-8017)
KC-135 Crash in Iraq Claims the Lives of Six US Airmen After Apparent Midair Collision 20

Military officials still do not know exactly what caused Thursday’s crash. Investigators are looking into what happened between the two aircraft before the KC-135 went down.

Statement on the KC-135 midair collision by the US Air Force
IMAGE: USAF

Air-to-air refueling operations are routine for the US military, but they require precise coordination between aircraft flying in close proximity at high altitude. Mishaps are rare, but investigators believe a midair collision may have played a role in the incident, according to reports citing officials familiar with the early stages of the investigation.

The crash happened in a remote desert area of western Iraq near the Jordanian border. US aircraft often fly through this region while supporting operations in the Middle East.

This is the fourth US aircraft crash made public since Operation Epic Fury started in late February. Earlier, three US Air Force F-15E Strike Eagles were accidentally shot down by Kuwaiti F/A-18s in a friendly fire incident. All the pilots ejected safely.

KC-135 aircraft have had several fatal accidents over the years, but these are still uncommon. The last fatal crash before Thursday was on 3 May 2013, when a KC-135R crashed soon after takeoff from Manas Air Base in Kyrgyzstan during operations in Afghanistan, killing all three crew members. A later Air Force investigation found the plane had a rudder malfunction before the tail broke off in flight.

Right now, investigators are trying to find out what happened over western Iraq. Military officials say they will review flight data, communication records, and other evidence to determine how the crash occurred.

As recovery efforts continue, the US military has promised to honor the six airmen who died. War Secretary Pete Hegseth called them “heroes” during a briefing after the incident and said they will be brought back to the United States with a dignified transfer at Dover Air Force Base.

The AvGeekery team offers sincere condolences to the families of the heroes who lost their lives in this tragedy. These warriors made the ultimate sacrifice for freedom and will always be remembered.

White House Launches Landmark eVTOL Pilot Program Across 26 States

0

Eight projects from across the United States have been picked for a new eVTOL pilot program. This program will test air taxis and advanced air mobility in real-world situations.

Somewhere, George Jetson is already late for work.

For years, electric air taxis have been among aviation’s most talked-about technologies, always seeming just out of reach. Prototypes have flown, and flashy concept videos have promised city-to-city commutes in minutes. We’ve covered them extensively at AvGeekery. Startups building electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, or eVTOLs, have attracted billions of dollars in investment.

Until now, though, most of the progress has taken place in labs, hangars, and tightly controlled test flights.

On 9 March 2026, the US Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) moved closer to making this technology a reality. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced that eight pilot projects in 26 states will join the Advanced Air Mobility and eVTOL Integration Pilot Program (eIPP), a national effort to test how these aircraft can safely operate in US airspace.

The program began with President Donald Trump’s “Unleashing Drone Dominance” executive order, which aimed to speed up the use of new aviation technologies. The FAA says this initiative will create one of the largest real-world testing grounds so far for next-generation aircraft.

The future of aviation is here.

US DOT Secretary Sean P. Duffy

“Thanks to President Trump, the future of aviation is here, and it’s going to dramatically improve how people and products move,” Secretary Duffy said in announcing the program. “Working together, we will ensure America leads the way in safely leveraging next-gen aircraft to radically redefine personal travel, regional transportation, cargo logistics, emergency medicine, and so much more.”

If all goes according to plan, Americans could begin seeing these aircraft in action as early as summer 2026.

Official announcement video of the eVTOL pilot program

A Nationwide Testbed for the Future of Flight

Archer Midnight in United livery. Archer is part of the White House's eVTOL pilot program announced on 9 March 2026
IMAGE: Archer

Rather than concentrating on just one city, the program will test across a wide range of locations. The eight chosen projects bring together state transportation agencies, local governments, and industry partners to try out different types of operations.

One of the most high-profile projects will happen in the New York metro area, where the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey will test several advanced air mobility ideas across New England. This includes the possibility of passenger eVTOL flights from the Downtown Manhattan Heliport (JRB), a spot already known to helicopter commuters.

Map of New York Metro area showing flight time from Newark Liberty (EWR) to the Manhattan Heliport via Archer aircraft
Map of New York Metro area showing flight time from Newark Liberty (EWR) to the Manhattan Heliport via Archer aircraft | IMAGE: Archer

Several major aircraft developers are involved in that effort, including Archer Aviation, Joby Aviation, BETA Technologies, and Electra.

In Texas, the state Department of Transportation will focus on regional air mobility by connecting Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio, and possibly expanding to Houston. The idea is to create air taxi networks that reach out from big cities to nearby communities.

Other projects are led by transportation agencies in Utah, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Florida, and North Carolina. There’s also a special autonomy project that will be managed by the City of Albuquerque in New Mexico.

Florida’s program will test a wide range of uses, such as cargo delivery, passenger transport, automated flights, and emergency medical missions.

Joby electric aircraft
IMAGE: Joby

Louisiana’s project will focus on moving cargo and workers to offshore energy sites in the Gulf, while North Carolina will test regional passenger flights and medical transport, with plans to expand autonomous operations into Virginia.

Across all eight projects, the program will evaluate a wide range of operational concepts, including:

  • Urban air taxi passenger service
  • Regional passenger transportation
  • Cargo and logistics networks
  • Emergency medical response operations
  • Autonomous flight technologies
  • Offshore and energy sector transportation

What Exactly Is an eVTOL?

Archer Midnight
Archer Midnight | IMAGE: Archer

The aircraft in these programs are a new kind of aviation technology that combines features of helicopters, drones, and regular airplanes.

Most eVTOL aircraft use several electric propellers to take off and land straight up and down, like a helicopter, then switch to flying on wings for efficient cruising. Since they don’t need runways, they could use small landing spots called vertiports in cities or near transport hubs.

Electra electric aircraft
IMAGE: Electra

Companies like Joby Aviation and Archer Aviation are working on piloted electric air taxis that can carry about four people on short trips. For example, Archer’s Midnight aircraft uses 12 propellers and engines and is built to be much quieter than a regular helicopter.

The aim is to swap long car rides for quick flights. Archer says it hopes to turn 60 to 90-minute commutes into much shorter trips using quiet, all-electric aircraft.

But making this vision a reality takes more than just building the aircraft. Regulators need to figure out how these vehicles can safely fit into already busy airspace.

Building the Playbook for a New Industry

Beta Alia aircraft over Las Vegas
BETA Alia | IMAGE: BETA Technologies

That’s where the pilot program comes in.

Instead of waiting for the technology to be fully ready before making rules, the FAA plans to collect real-world data from these early projects.


MORE eVTOL COVERAGE ON AVGEEKERY

“These partnerships will help us better understand how to safely and efficiently integrate these aircraft into the National Airspace System,” said FAA Deputy Administrator Chris Rocheleau. “The program will provide valuable operational experience that will inform the standards needed to enable safe Advanced Air Mobility operations.”

Over 30 proposals were sent to the Department of Transportation and the FAA before they chose the final eight projects.

BETA's all-electric ALIA VTOL
BETA’s all-electric ALIA VTOL | IMAGE: Beta Technologies

For aircraft makers and investors who have worked for years to build this industry, the program is a strong sign that the US is serious about bringing advanced air mobility to the market.

“This is a defining moment for American innovation,” said JoeBen Bevirt, founder and CEO of Joby Aviation. “Instead of just reading about the future of flight, communities across America are going to be able to see it in the skies above their own cities this year.”

This is a defining moment for American innovation.

JoeBen Bevirt | Founder + CEO of Joby Aviation

If the program goes as regulators and manufacturers hope, the skies over parts of the United States could soon look much different. Electric air taxis carrying passengers, cargo, or medical supplies may start appearing in places where helicopters used to be common. For generations who grew up watching cartoons like The Jetsons, the idea of riding in a flying commuter vehicle once felt like pure fiction.

With these pilot programs preparing to launch, that long-imagined future may finally be edging closer to reality.

Meet the X-76: DARPA’s Bold New Aircraft Could Change How Wars Are Fought

0

DARPA’s X-76 experimental aircraft could transform military aviation with high-speed, runway-independent flight and tiltrotor technology.

The X-76 is the latest in a long series of experimental X-planes developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).

DARPA introduced the X-76 on March 9, 2026. Bell Textron is building the aircraft as part of DARPA’s SPeed and Runway INdependent Technologies (SPRINT) program, a partnership with US Special Operations Command to address a long-standing challenge in aviation.

For over a century, aircraft designers have faced a tough choice. Fast planes need runways and fixed wings, while helicopters and vertical lift aircraft can land almost anywhere but sacrifice speed.

The X-76 aims to overcome this trade-off.

DARPA’s goal is ambitious: to build an aircraft that can take off and land vertically from rough terrain and still cruise at over 400 knots. If successful, this could change how military aircraft operate in contested or remote areas.

The experimental aircraft has passed a key design review, and Bell Textron has started building it. Flight tests are planned for later in the program, with a test campaign expected in Phase 3 around early 2028.

Moving Beyond Runway Dependence

Artist’s concept for a future operational aircraft based on SPRINT X-76 technology. In this rendering, an optionally piloted aircraft cruising at speeds up to 450 knots
Artist’s concept for a future operational aircraft based on SPRINT X-76 technology. In this rendering, an optionally piloted aircraft cruising at speeds up to 450 knots | IMAGE: DARPA

The X-76 began with DARPA’s SPRINT initiative, launched in November 2023 to find ways to combine high-speed fixed-wing performance with real runway independence.

The idea is deceptively simple: design an aircraft that takes off and lands like a helicopter but cruises at speeds close to those of regular airplanes.

DARPA SPRINT program manager Cmdr. Ian Higgins of the US Navy says that runways have become a strategic vulnerability.

“For too long, the runway has been both an enabler and a tether, granting speed but creating a critical vulnerability,” Higgins said. “With SPRINT, we’re not just building an X-plane; we’re building options. We’re working to deliver the option of surprise, the option of rapid reinforcement, and the option of life-saving speed, anywhere on the globe, without needing any runway.”

We’re working to deliver the option of surprise, the option of rapid reinforcement, and the option of life-saving speed, anywhere on the globe, without needing any runway.

US Navy Commander Ian Higgins

The X-76 will likely use a tiltrotor design, similar to the Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey and Bell’s V-280 Valor. However, the SPRINT demonstrator aims to advance this idea even more.

Design images show the aircraft can take off and land vertically, hover in challenging environments, and switch to high-speed flight once airborne. The program is also looking at features such as folding or stoppable rotors to reduce drag during high-speed flight.

If it works as planned, the aircraft could cruise at 400 to 450 knots. That’s much faster than regular helicopters and even quicker than most tiltrotor aircraft in use today.

This means the X-76 could offer the flexibility of a helicopter along with the speed of a turboprop or light jet.

A New Generation of Special Operations Aircraft

The Bell X-1-2 sits on the ramp at the NACA High-Speed Flight Research Station in 1949 with crew members Edwin R. Edwards, Bud Rogers, crew chief Richard E. Payne, and Henry “Kenny” Gaskins.Operating from the edge of Rogers Dry Lake at Edwards Air Force Base, the rocket-powered X-1-2 was air-launched from a B-29A and used to study the transonic flight regime between Mach 0.7 and Mach 1.3.
Bell’s innovations have led to the improvement of aviation through the years with its “X-Planes.” The Bell X-1-2 sits on the ramp at the NACA High-Speed Flight Research Station in 1949 with crew members Edwin R. Edwards, Bud Rogers, crew chief Richard E. Payne, and Henry “Kenny” Gaskins. Operating from the edge of Rogers Dry Lake at Edwards Air Force Base, the rocket-powered X-1-2 was air-launched from a B-29A and used to study the transonic flight regime between Mach 0.7 and Mach 1.3. | IMAGE: NASA

Although the X-76 is just a test model, the technology it explores could greatly impact future military aircraft.

DARPA sees special operations forces as the main group to benefit. These missions often take place in remote or dangerous areas where runways might not exist or could be at risk. Helicopters are flexible but slow, while fixed-wing planes are fast but need proper airfields.

The X-76 is designed to close this gap.

DARPA’s program documents suggest a platform that could deploy troops, vehicles, or critical equipment directly into austere environments, eliminating the need for traditional airbases. The concept images released with the announcement depict a wide-body aircraft capable of carrying significant payloads, suggesting uses such as rapid troop insertion, logistics, and casualty evacuation.

The name X-76 is also symbolic. The “76” refers to 1776, tying the announcement to the United States’ 250th anniversary in 2026.

This project builds on Bell Textron’s long experience with high-speed vertical lift. The company has worked on tiltrotor aircraft since the XV-3 and XV-15, through the V-22 Osprey, and more recently the V-280 Valor for the US Army’s Future Long Range Assault Aircraft program.

The SPRINT demonstrator is not meant to become an operational aircraft. Instead, the X-76 will test and prove the aerodynamic, propulsion, and flight control ideas needed for high-speed, runway-independent aircraft.

If these technologies work, they could lead to a new generation of military aircraft.

That has always been the role of X-planes in experimental aviation. From the rocket-powered X-1 that broke the sound barrier, to the lifting-body tests of the 1960s and later hypersonic research planes, these programs have kept expanding what aircraft are capable of.

The X-76 could be the next step in that tradition.

Right now, the aircraft is mostly just engineering drawings and parts being built. But if DARPA and Bell succeed, the idea of combining jet-like speed with real runway independence could become an operational reality in the not-too-distant future.

Airlines Evacuating Travelers From Middle East Conflict as Thousands Remain Stranded

Airlines evacuating travelers from Middle East conflict are scrambling to move passengers as airspace closures cripple regional aviation.

Almost a week after military strikes and missile attacks led to widespread airspace closures in the Middle East, flights in the region are still heavily disrupted. Major airline hubs now have only a few flights, leaving tens of thousands of travelers stranded and forcing airlines, governments, and regulators to come up with new evacuation plans.

For Americans following the situation, there is one major complication: US airlines are not allowed to operate rescue flights into the region at this time.

As a result, foreign airlines, government charter flights, and a few partially reopened airports are handling the huge job of getting travelers out.

Global Aviation Network Suddenly Disrupted

FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East as a result of Operation Epic Fury
FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East and other global conflict regions as a result of Operation Epic Fury | IMAGE: FlightRadar24

When Operation Epic Fury began, the Middle East’s aviation network effectively seized up overnight. Airspace closures spread across multiple countries as missile strikes and military operations escalated.

Airports in Iran, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Qatar, Bahrain, and Kuwait are still closed or heavily restricted. This has cut off major routes that international airlines use to connect Europe, Asia, Africa, and North America.

This situation has had a huge impact on global aviation.

According to aviation analytics firm Cirium, an estimated 900,000 airline seats are normally available each day to, from, and within the Middle East. Since the conflict began, roughly 4.4 million seats have been canceled across the region.

Even the biggest airports in the region are running at much lower capacity. Dubai International Airport (DXB), usually one of the world’s busiest, has seen its operations drop sharply since the airspace shutdown began.

Normally, the airport handles about 1,200 flights each day.

Despite the chaos, a limited number of rescue flights are now slowly restoring some movement.

UAE Airlines Lead the Rescue Effort

Airlines evacuating travelers from Middle East conflict include Emirates and flydubai from Dubai International Airport (DXB)
IMAGE: Dubai International Airport

The United Arab Emirates was the first to make real progress, partly reopening its airspace and setting up special ‘safe corridors’ for flights leaving Dubai (DXB and Al-Maktoum International DWC), Abu Dhabi’s Zayed International Airport (AUH), and Sharjah International Airport (SHJ).

These routes allow a limited number of planes to leave the region while avoiding unsafe areas.

UAE-based airlines were among the first to use these corridors. Emirates, Flydubai, IndiGo, and Etihad Airways started running limited flights to help stranded passengers leave the country.

Since DXB and AUH are usually major international transit hubs, huge numbers of travelers have been stranded there. Airlines have responded by using their largest equipment.

Both Emirates and Etihad have used their Airbus A380s on some flights, allowing them to carry hundreds of passengers at a time. Many of these flights have been heading to European and Asian cities, such as London or Singapore. For many travelers, these flights are just the first step home, as they go on to connect to additional flights once they reach countries with open airspace.

Other airlines have joined in as well. Flight tracking shows that Air India, Air Arabia, Uzbekistan Airways, Kenya Airways, Royal Air Maroc, Flynas, Royal Jordanian, and SpiceJet are all running flights from Dubai back to their home countries.

European Airlines Launch Repatriation Flights

British Airways and Emirates 777s at DXB
A British Airways Boeing 777 at Dubai International Airport (DXB) | IMAGE: Konstantin von Wedelstaedt (GFDL 1.2 or GFDL 1.2 ), via Wikimedia Commons

Airlines outside the region are also playing a role in the evacuation effort, particularly in neighboring countries where airports remain operational.

Muscat, Oman, has become one of the main escape routes for travelers leaving the conflict area.

European carriers, including Lufthansa, Swiss, Smartwings, Aegean Airlines, and British Airways, have been operating special repatriation flights from Muscat International Airport (MCT) to bring citizens home.

Some airlines have also tried direct rescue flights from Dubai. Croatia Airlines and Smartwings have run a few flights to evacuate stranded travelers.

However, the security situation has forced airlines to remain cautious. While the frequency of Iranian missile and drone incursions into UAE airspace has decreased, the country is still experiencing intermittent incursions, even as recently as Thursday, 5 March.

Air France announced plans for a repatriation flight from Dubai to Paris, but quickly canceled it because of what the airline called “the ongoing security situation.”

Russian carriers Aeroflot and S7 Airlines have also continued transporting passengers from the region. However, their flights to Moscow are taking significantly longer because aircraft must detour around large sections of restricted airspace.

Even with these flights, there are still not enough seats for everyone who wants to leave.

British Airways said on social media that all of its limited rescue flights for the weekend were already full.

US Airlines Cannot Fly Rescue Missions

US airlines like United are halting Middle East services
A United Boeing 787 | IMAGE: Photo by Arkin Si on Unsplash

While airlines from other countries have started evacuation flights, US carriers have mostly not been involved in the rescue effort.

The reason is regulatory.

US-based airlines cannot operate flights into dangerous airspace without approval from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

As a result, airlines such as United Airlines and Delta Air Lines have instead focused on suspending service and helping reposition crews safely.

United Airlines, which had been operating flights to both Ben Gurion Airport (TLV) in Tel Aviv and DXB, spent several days working to extract its pilots and flight attendants from the region after the conflict escalated.

The Association of Flight Attendants said the military action had placed airline crews “in harm’s way.”

The Air Line Pilots Association said that all United crew members were eventually evacuated from Dubai. Some reportedly traveled across Saudi Arabia by land before taking commercial flights out of Riyadh’s King Khalid International Airport (RUH).

United has now canceled its TLV and DXB flights until at least 11 March. Delta Air Lines has paused its flights between New York JFK and TLV until 22 March.

US Government Organizes Charter Flights

Officials from the State Department help travelers evacuate the Middle East
Embassy officials from the US Department of State assist travelers as they attempt to return home from the Middle East | IMAGE: US Department of State

Since US airlines cannot run rescue flights, the US government has stepped in to help stranded citizens.

The US State Department confirmed that charter flights are now being used to evacuate Americans from the region.

One charter flight carrying US citizens departed the Middle East on Wednesday, and officials say additional flights will be added as security conditions allow.

So far, the State Department says nearly 18,000 Americans have returned to the United States since the crisis began. About 7,300 of those travelers received direct government assistance.

Officials say thousands more have made it to Europe or Asia and are continuing their trips home from there.

Americans still in the region are being urged to contact the State Department’s 24-hour emergency task force or sign up online for help.

Officials say that registering helps them find out where citizens are and lets the government quickly notify people when evacuation flights are available.

Starlink Aviation Plan Changes Spark Backlash Over 100 MPH Speed Cap

Starlink aviation plan changes trigger backlash after a new 100 mph cap ends affordable in-flight internet for many GA pilots.

Throughout 2025, General Aviation pilots finally had a practical and affordable way to get real in-flight internet with Starlink’s portable Mini hardware. For $50 a month, they could use 100 GB of high-speed data. For pilots flying piston singles or light twins, this was a game-changer.

But now, that option is no longer available.

Starlink has made major changes to its in-motion data plans for aviation. The biggest change is that standard mobile plans, which used to work in flight, are now limited to 100 mph. For most planes, this means the plans stop working as soon as you take off.

Pilots have quickly voiced their frustration in forums and aviation groups. Many feel that the progress toward affordable cockpit internet has been reversed.

Here’s a look at what changed and why pilots are so upset.

The Old Reality: Affordable, High-Data In Flight

Starlink aviation plan changes trigger backlash after a new 100 mph cap ends affordable in-flight internet for many GA pilots.

In early and mid-2025, many GA pilots used standard Roam, Local Priority, or Global Priority plans with the Starlink Mini. Even though using these plans in planes was a gray area, it became common and practical.

Here’s what a typical setup looked like:

  • Roam 100GB: About $50 per month for 100 GB of high-speed data.
  • Roam Unlimited or Global Priority variants: Around $165 per month for unlimited data.
  • In-motion support up to 450 mph after plan adjustments in 2025.
  • No identity verification requirement for standard use.

Earlier in 2025, Starlink improved things even more. They set a 450 mph speed limit for all plans and increased the base data to 100 GB at no extra cost. For GA pilots, this was a welcome surprise.

For about the cost of a few tanks of avgas, pilots could get reliable internet in the cockpit. This let them access:

  • High-resolution weather imagery
  • Icing forecasts
  • Real-time turbulence updates
  • Email and flight planning apps
  • Supplemental ADS-B and PIREP data

For pilots flying less than 100 hours a year, the cost was reasonable. The plans were month-to-month, easy to pause, and much cheaper than older aviation internet options.

That era is now over.

The New Structure: 100 MPH Cap and Aviation-Only Tiers

Starlink aviation plan changes trigger backlash after a new 100 mph cap ends affordable in-flight internet for many GA pilots
IMAGE: Starlink

Starting this month, Starlink has set a strict 100 mph in-motion cap on all standard Roam, Local Priority, and Global Priority plans. That’s 87 knots, which is actually slower than many aircraft taxi speeds on a brisk day.

If the system detects use above that speed, users get notifications and may lose service. There is no grandfathering for those who used these plans in flight before.

For pilots who want connectivity above 100 mph, Starlink has created new aviation-specific tiers:

Aviation 300MPH

  • $250 per month
  • 20 GB included
  • $10 per GB overage, opt-in
  • Up to 300 mph
  • Land and territorial waters only
  • Identity verification required

Aviation 450MPH

  • $1,000 per month
  • 20 GB included
  • $50 per GB overage
  • Up to 450 mph
  • Includes full ocean coverage
  • Identity verification required

The difference is striking.

What once cost $50 for 100 GB at 450 mph now costs $250 for only 20 GB at 300 mph. If you want 450 mph and ocean coverage, the price jumps to $1,000 per month, which is too expensive for most piston owners.

High-end certified Business Aviation plans remain unchanged. The Business 20GB plan sits at $2,000 per month, with $100 per GB overage. Business Unlimited is $10,000 per month. These were never aimed at light aircraft owners, and they remain priced accordingly.

The Starlink Mini hardware still works for in-motion use, but now it’s tied to these new restrictions and aviation-specific plans. Users have to submit a support ticket to switch, since there’s no simple self-service option.

Why the Anger Runs Deep

AI image of wifi beaming from satellite to airplane
Starlink Aviation Plan Changes Spark Backlash Over 100 MPH Speed Cap 39

The frustration is not just about money, but also about how suddenly things changed.

In 2025, Starlink increased speed limits and data caps. Many pilots bought hardware and built their cockpit routines around the service. They budgeted for it and made it part of their safety toolkit.

Now, they face a price increase of five to twenty times for usable in-flight speeds, along with much less included data. Twenty gigabytes goes fast when you’re downloading high-resolution weather, updating charts, and using several connected devices.

Pilots also point to the safety angle. For many, Starlink was not just about streaming or convenience. It supported:

  • Real-time weather decision-making
  • Icing and turbulence avoidance
  • Updated PIREPs in marginal conditions

Losing affordable access feels like losing a safety tool.

There’s also a sense of being left out. The new plans require identity verification and formal aviation-tier enrollment. What once felt like an innovative, flexible solution for light aircraft now feels divided and corporate.

To be fair, Starlink’s plans are still month-to-month. Users can pause or switch, and residential and stationary unlimited plans haven’t changed. But for planes flying faster than 100 mph, the old workaround is no longer available.

Some pilots are already canceling and going back to SiriusXM weather or other older solutions. Others are asking for a middle tier. A plan in the $100 to $150 range with 100 GB and a 300 to 400 mph cap would probably ease much of the backlash. An online petition asking Starlink to reconsider the changes is gaining steam (2,900 signatures as of the time of this writing – you can sign it here).

It’s not clear if that will happen.

In the meantime, the bottom line is: if you fly faster than 87 knots and use a standard Roam plan, affordable in-flight broadband is no longer an option. For a community that briefly enjoyed new connectivity freedom, this change is tough to accept.

Operation Epic Fury Leads to Epic Chaos Across Global Air Travel

0

At 0200 EST on Saturday, 28 February 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes on Iran in what is being called Operation Epic Fury.

Within hours, the effects could be seen both on the ground and in the air.

Flight tracking maps showed almost empty skies over Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Israel, and Bahrain after the strikes began and Iran responded with missiles. One of the world’s busiest air corridors quickly emptied.

Witnesses told Reuters they heard explosions in cities across the Gulf, such as Doha, Abu Dhabi, and Dubai. As military activity increased, governments in the region started closing their airspace to civilian flights.

This led to a series of aviation shutdowns across the region.

Airspace Closures Spread Across the Region

FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East as a result of Operation Epic Fury
FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East as a result of Operation Epic Fury | IMAGE: FlightRadar24

By midday Saturday, much of the Middle East had either closed or heavily restricted civilian flights.

Airspace closures as a result of Operation Epic Fury as of 28 Feb 2026
Airspace closures as a result of Operation Epic Fury as of 28 Feb 2026 | IMAGE: FlightRadar24

Countries that have fully closed their airspace:

  • Iran
  • Israel
  • Iraq
  • Kuwait
  • Bahrain
  • Qatar
  • Jordan

Countries reporting restrictions or partial closures:

  • United Arab Emirates
  • Syria (southern corridors)
  • Oman

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) advised airlines to avoid flying in several affected areas because of the risks from ongoing military operations.

Flight tracking services showed a quick and dramatic change, as flights that usually crossed the Gulf were forced to detour far north or south. The normal flow of long-haul jets between Europe and Asia vanished from the map.

Gulf Megahubs Grind to a Halt

Dubai International Airport (DXB)
IMAGE: Dubai International Airport

The closure of major Gulf airports had the biggest impact.

Dubai International Airport (DXB), the world’s busiest for international travel, suspended all flights “until further notice,” along with Al Maktoum International Airport (DWC). In a statement, Dubai Airports told passengers not to come to the airport and to contact their airlines directly.

Statement from Dubai Airports about Operation Epic Fury
Statement issued by Dubai Airports following the start of Operation Epic Fury on 28 Feb 2026 | IMAGE: Dubai Airports

Dubai International handled nearly 100 million passengers last year, according to Reuters. On Saturday, most departures were canceled.

At Doha’s Hamad International Airport (DOH), gates were almost empty as stranded passengers waited to rebook flights or find hotel rooms, according to a Reuters witness.

Kuwait International Airport (KWI) was also impacted. Authorities said an Iranian drone strike caused some damage to a passenger terminal and minor injuries, leading to the postponement of all arrivals and departures.

Etihad Airways suspended departures from Abu Dhabi’s Zayed International Airport (AUH) until at least 1000 GMT Sunday. Emirates and flydubai also suspended flights to and from Dubai because of the airspace closures. The airlines told crew members to check their schedules for changes and let stranded staff use company phones to contact family.

“You have crews, planes, and passengers stranded all over the world. It’s a massive logistical nightmare,” a Gulf airline spokesperson told Reuters.

Airlines Suspend, Reroute, Cancel

Emirates A380 at Dubai
An Emirates A380 super jumbo taxis at Dubai International Airport (DXB) | IMAGE: Emirates

The disruption soon affected areas outside the Middle East as well.

Preliminary data from Cirium, reported by Reuters, showed that about 24 percent of flights to the Middle East were cancelled on 28 February. About half of flights to Qatar and Israel were canceled, and about 28 percent of flights to Kuwait were canceled.

You have crews, planes, and passengers stranded all over the world. It’s a massive logistical nightmare.

A Gulf airline source via Reuters

Major airlines announcing suspensions or cancellations include:

  • Lufthansa: Suspending Dubai flights for the weekend and halting Tel Aviv, Beirut, and Oman routes until 7 March
  • British Airways: Canceling Tel Aviv and Bahrain flights until 3 March
  • Air France and KLM: Cancelling Tel Aviv and Beirut services
  • Wizz Air: Suspending Israel, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Amman routes
  • Russian carriers: Suspending flights to Iran and Israel
  • Virgin Atlantic: Avoiding Iraqi airspace and rerouting flights

In the United States, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines suspended flights to Ben Gurion Airport (TLV) in Tel Aviv and DXB. American Airlines’ Doha flights were affected. All three carriers issued waivers allowing customers to rebook without change fees through 5 March.

A Growing Global Ripple Effect

FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East as a result of Operation Epic Fury
FlightRadar24 map showing deserted airspace over the Middle East and other global conflict regions as a result of Operation Epic Fury | IMAGE: FlightRadar24

The Middle East is an important link between Europe and Asia. When this route is closed, the effects reach far beyond the region and can be felt worldwide.

Flights now have to take longer routes around restricted airspace, which adds hours to travel time and uses more fuel. Aircraft and crews are not where they need to be. Cargo shipments are delayed, and there are growing concerns about insurance and security.

The region became even more important for east-west flights after airlines began avoiding Russian and Ukrainian airspace due to the conflict. Losing another vital corridor makes global air traffic even more crowded.

Security experts warn that these airspace closures could continue for some time.

“Passengers and airlines can expect airspace to be shut for quite some time in the region. The impact on regional aviation is immediate and highly fluid,” Eric Schouten, head of aviation security advisory Dyami, told Reuters.

As of Saturday evening, there was no timeline for reopening major Gulf airports. Military operations and retaliatory strikes remain ongoing.

Antonov An-22: The World’s Biggest Turboprop That Sounded Like A Buzz Saw

It didn’t just fly. It thundered. The Antonov An-22 was a 176,000-pound Cold War workhorse whose unmistakable sound echoed for 60 years.

Cargo planes have an unmistakable sound. Seasoned avgeeks can identify a plane just by the sound it makes as it’s flying overhead. The original C-5 was unique with its TF-39s screaming. The C-133 had a distinctive whine. The C-17’s aggressive roar from its P&W F-117 engines lets you know it’s going to stop in less than 2,000 feet once it touches down. And the C-130’s four fans of freedom make an unmistakable sound that has inspired generations for over 70 years!

But there’s another, lesser-known turboprop whose sound was also unmistakable. It’s the Antonov An-22.

Antonov An-22
IMAGE: JetPix (GFDL 1.2 or GFDL 1.2 ), via Wikimedia Commons

The An-22 first flew on 27 February 1965. It was designed as a strategic airlifter capable of landing on short, austere runways throughout the Soviet Union. The plane required a crew of between 5 to 8. Up front, the aircraft was fully pressurized and could carry up to 28 passengers. The aft compartment was only partially pressurized.

The An-22 was powered by four turboprop engines, each with two counter-rotating props. A total of 68 An-22s were built between 1965 and 1976.

By the late 2010s, the Antonov An-22 was more of a legend than a common sight. In Russia, only a few were still listed with the 76th Military Transport Air Squadron in Tver. Officially, there were six planes, but only about half could actually fly. Still, there was discussion about keeping them in service into the 2030s.

Antonov Airlines in Ukraine kept one civilian An-22 flying until 2020. This plane, registered as UR-09307, was the last commercial connection to the An-22’s Cold War roots. In 2022, it was damaged during the early days of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, ending its role as the final civilian operator.

By mid-2024, it seemed Russia had retired the An-22 as well. Reports showed the remaining planes were no longer flying, and one, RF-09309, was sent to Yekaterinburg to be put on display instead of being readied for more flights.

The last airworthy Antonov An-22 breaks apart in midair in a December 2025 accident
The last airworthy Antonov An-22 breaks apart in midair in a December 2025 accident | IMAGE: CCTV Footage via Aviation Safety Network

Tragically, the last known An-22 crashed in the Ivanovo region northeast of Moscow on 9 December 2025. All seven people on board were presumed dead. Witnesses said the large turboprop appeared to break apart in the air. After this crash, the era of the world’s largest turboprop transport was over.

The An-22 could carry up to 176,000 lbs of payload. By comparison, the C-17 can carry around 170,000 lbs of cargo/passengers.

Bonus: Why does the An-22 have two tails?

Antonov An-22 taxiing for takeoff and the An-225 Mriya on short final
Antonov An-22 taxiing for takeoff and the An-225 Mriya on short final. Mriya was destroyed early on in the Russia-Ukraine War in 2022 | IMAGE: Igor Bubin (GFDL 1.2 or GFDL 1.2 ), via Wikimedia Commons

Here’s one for trivia night. The An-22 looked pretty similar in shape to the An-12, just with two tails. The second tail reduced the tail’s height requirement and improved engine-out performance.

Also, if you need to wow your friends at trivia night, the NATO reporting name for the An-22 was ‘Cock’. And now you know.

WATCH: Air France 787 Dreamliner Captured as You’ve Never Seen It Before

This Air France 787 takes center stage in a breathtakingly beautiful aviation film that highlights the beauty of modern widebody flight.

Few things lend themselves to beautiful cinematography quite like aviation.

Metal, light, motion, and altitude all come together when filming an airplane against the open sky. When captured well, it can look almost unreal. Every now and then, a film reminds us just how stunning modern flight is.

This Air France Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner video is one of those films.

This is pure aviation eye candy, with slow, cinematic air-to-air shots and light hitting the fuselage perfectly, set to a beautiful soundtrack. The Dreamliner’s wing flex is unmistakable. It feels more like a carefully crafted tribute to long-haul flying than a marketing video.

And the airplane at the center of it deserves the spotlight.

Air France 787
IMAGE: Air France

Air France currently operates ten Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners. Deliveries began in November 2016 and wrapped up in 2020, with the first aircraft entering service in January 2017. Today, the fleet averages about 7.8 years old. Each jet carries 279 passengers in a three-class configuration: 30 lie-flat Business seats in a 1-2-1 layout, 21 Premium Economy, and 228 in Economy.

Under those sculpted nacelles sit General Electric GEnx engines, powering the type across medium- and long-haul routes to North America, Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean.

The 787-9 plays a key role in Air France’s long-haul modernization, replacing older jets and working alongside the larger Airbus A350s and Boeing 777s. It’s a workhorse, but in this video, it becomes art.

If you’ve seen Air France’s recent videos, this won’t surprise you. Earlier this year, they released a beautiful tribute to Concorde for its 50th anniversary, which was full of nostalgia. This Dreamliner film feels different. It’s calm, intentional, and confident.

And if you want to go down the rabbit hole, do not miss the “Air France ATHOS A350” video:

In this film, the Airbus A350 flies with the Patrouille de France, the precision aerobatic team of the French Air and Space Force. The Patrouille, flying Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jets in tight formation, joins the A350 in an aerial ballet to celebrate Air France’s 90th anniversary and the team’s 70th. The coordination is so impressive it might make your palms sweat just watching. The result on screen is extraordinary.

Both productions come from Airborne Films, a Paris-based aerial cinematography company whose work you have almost certainly seen. They have filmed for Airbus, Boeing, and Air France, but also for Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures, Disney, Apple TV+, and Netflix. If you watched Masters of the Air or Mission Impossible: The Final Reckoning, you’ve already seen what they can do. It is worth taking a look at the rest of their work.

So here’s the simple takeaway.

If you’ve got a few quiet minutes today, give yourself the gift of pressing play. Turn the volume up. Watch it on the biggest screen you can find. And let yourself enjoy it.

There’s no agenda or headline here – just great airplanes, great lighting, and a team that knows how to capture both.

Miami International Airport Unveils $1 Billion Concourse D Expansion Led by American Airlines

American Airlines and Miami-Dade County officials have revealed plans for a sweeping $1 billion expansion of Concourse D at Miami International Airport (MIA).

The plans for the project, which will update one of the airport’s older gate areas and strengthen American’s position as the main airline at MIA, were unveiled on Wednesday, 25 February, by American Airlines and Miami-Dade County officials.

American Airlines' Gate D60 at Miami International Airport
American Airlines’ Gate D60 at Miami International Airport | IMAGE: Miami International Airport

The plan centers on a full renovation of Gate D60, a small section of the North Terminal currently used mostly for regional jets. Right now, it has 17 ground-level gates sharing one boarding area, and passengers often have to go outside to board. Any traveler who has had to use D60 at MIA in recent years can attest that this area definitely doesn’t match the rest of the airport’s vibe.

In a 2024 interview with the Miami Herald, MIA Director and CEO Ralph Cutié described the current D60 footprint as “a very constrained area,” adding that the planned renovation “will transform one of the older, more rundown parts of North Terminal.”

The new expansion will add a three-level concourse with 17 regular gates for larger regional and narrowbody planes. Each gate will have its own boarding area, so passengers will have more space and won’t need to board outside. The design also includes direct access on the third floor to US Customs and Border Protection for international arrivals, making the process easier for travelers coming from abroad.

Construction is set to begin in 2027, and the new D60 area should be finished by 2030. This project is part of MIA’s larger $9 billion modernization plan, which includes over 200 improvements already in progress.

Funding, Partnerships, and Miami’s Global Role

Rendering of American Airlines' new concourse at MIA
Rendering of American Airlines’ new concourse at MIA | IMAGE: Miami International Airport

Greg Chin, Communications Director for the Miami-Dade Aviation Department, said most of the $1 billion expansion will be paid for with bonds issued by the airport. As with other projects funded this way, airlines pay back the debt through landing fees and terminal charges, with bigger airlines covering more of the cost. The Florida Department of Transportation has also given $34 million in grants for the project, Chin told the Miami Herald.

For American Airlines, this investment is both necessary for operations and part of their long-term plans.

“The brand-new, reimagined D60 is a transformational project that will provide a much-improved experience for our customers and our team,” said American Airlines CEO Robert Isom during the unveiling event on 25 February at MIA. “Miami is an essential hub and international gateway for American, and it’s a key part of our history and our future.”

American operates about 400 flights a day from MIA to 155 destinations and handles over 60 percent of the airport’s passengers, according to the company. This year, the airline plans its biggest summer schedule yet from Miami, further cementing MIA as its main hub for Latin America and the Caribbean.

Juan Carlos Liscano, American’s Vice President of MIA Operations, highlighted the airline’s long history in South Florida. “American and Miami-Dade have built a partnership across decades that intertwines our success and vitality,” he said at the event. He also noted that 15,500 American employees are based at MIA and called the expansion “a testament to our commitment for the long term.”

Premium Push and Passenger Experience

Rendering of American Airlines' new concourse at Miami International Airport
Rendering of American Airlines’ new concourse at MIA | IMAGE: American Airlines

Along with more gates, the new D60 extension aims to create a more modern experience for passengers. Images from the airport and airline show bright, open spaces with lots of glass, indoor palm trees, and new places to eat and shop.

Rendering of American Airlines' new concourse at MIA
Rendering of American Airlines’ new concourse at MIA | IMAGE: American Airlines

“The D60 expansion is one of the most monumental customer service improvements within our unprecedented airport-wide modernization plan,” said Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava at the unveiling. She described the five-year initiative as one that will “transform the passenger experience at MIA from the cabin to the curb.”

American has announced a new Flagship lounge at MIA and a big expansion of its Admirals Club, all part of efforts to improve premium services at the airport.

Rendering of American Airlines' new concourse at MIA | IMAGE: American Airlines
Rendering of American Airlines’ new concourse at MIA | IMAGE: American Airlines

In the past year, the airline added new self-service kiosks for faster check-in and introduced technology to help passengers make connections more easily. American has also worked with the TSA and Customs and Border Protection on programs like TSA PreCheck, Touchless ID, and Enhanced Passenger Processing.

Miami’s Modernization in Action Plan (or MIA – get it?) adds MIA to an ever-growing list of US airports undergoing massive upgrades, such as New York LaGuardia (LGA), John F. Kennedy (JFK), Pittsburgh (PIT), Tampa (TPA), Chicago O’Hare (ORD), San Antonio (SAT), Denver (DEN), San Diego (SAN), Orlando (MCO), and more.

American and Miami Look Forward

American Airlines jets featuring liveries from different eras line the gates at Miami International Airport
American Airlines jets featuring liveries from different eras line the gates at MIA | IMAGE: Miami International Airport

The timing of this announcement is important for Miami. In recent years, the airport has been criticized for old facilities and crowded spaces, even as more people travel through it. Officials say upgrades need to happen while the airport stays open 24/7.

By 2030, travelers at Concourse D60 will find a space that looks very different from today. For American Airlines, this project shows that its almost 40-year partnership with Miami is not only continuing but also growing.

As Isom said, MIA is still “an essential hub and international gateway” for American. With 17 new gates on the horizon and a billion-dollar investment underway, the airport will look very different in the years to come.

Spirit Airlines Bankruptcy Update: Carrier Targets Early Summer Exit From Chapter 11

Spirit Airlines’ bankruptcy plan would cut debt by billions and position the airline to exit Chapter 11 by early summer 2026.

Finally, some good news for Spirit Airlines.

The carrier says it has reached an agreement in principle with its secured creditors and DIP (debtor-in-possession) lenders, clearing a major hurdle in its Chapter 11 restructuring. The goal is to emerge from bankruptcy in late spring or early summer 2026.

This news emerged from a US Bankruptcy Court hearing and was reported by outlets such as CNN, CNBC, and The Wall Street Journal on 24 February 2026. All reports point to the same core development: Spirit has the financial backing it needs to finish restructuring and move toward life after Chapter 11.

What This Means in Plain English

Spirit Airlines Airbus A320neo
Spirit Airlines Airbus A320neo | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines

Spirit is not shutting down. It’s reshaping itself.

CEO Dave Davis says the airline will come out “strong” and “leaner,” positioned to compete as a value-focused carrier. Here’s what that “new Spirit” is expected to look like:

Smaller and more focused network

Spirit plans to concentrate its flying on its strongest routes and peak demand periods. Expect fewer off-peak flights and tighter scheduling to maximize aircraft utilization. Some reports suggest as much as 40 percent fewer flights this summer compared to 2024 levels.

Fleet and capacity adjustments

The airline will trim its fleet and reduce overall capacity, aligning with that more focused network strategy. The goal is to stop flying marginal routes and double down where demand is strongest.

More premium seating options

Yes, Spirit and premium in the same sentence. The airline plans to expand Spirit First and Premium Economy seating while still keeping its low-fare DNA. They’re also enhancing the Free Spirit loyalty program and co-brand credit card offerings to drive repeat business.

Much lighter debt load

This is the big financial headline. Spirit expects to cut its debt and lease obligations from about $7.4 billion before filing to roughly $2.1 billion after emerging. That’s a massive reset and one that gives the airline a lot more breathing room.

For Passengers Right Now

If you’re booked on Spirit, nothing changes in the short term. The airline says guests can continue to book flights and use tickets, credits, and loyalty points as normal throughout the restructuring process.

This is Really Good News

Spirit Airlines bankruptcy plans include a leaner fleet, and fewer aircraft like this Airbus A321
Spirit Airlines bankruptcy could be nearing its end | IMAGE: Spirit Airlines

This is Spirit’s second trip through Chapter 11, but today’s announcement suggests it’s on a defined path out. The strategy is pretty clear: shrink to profitability, focus on high-demand flying, cut costs aggressively, and layer in more premium upsell options without abandoning the ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC) model that built it.

For those of us who watch fleet moves and route maps for fun, the next few months could be very interesting. Route cuts, aircraft dispositions, cabin reconfigurations, and maybe even post-bankruptcy partnership or merger chatter could all be on the table once Spirit is back on stable footing.

While not completely out of the woods yet, this good news is certainly welcome. Spirit is aiming to be back out of bankruptcy court by early summer, lighter and leaner, betting that a sharper network and a cleaned-up balance sheet will keep those yellow jets in the sky and, most importantly, preserve thousands of jobs for pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, and ground crews.

Bullet Holes Found on American Airlines 737 After Medellín–Miami Flight

An American Airlines 737 MAX 8 was taken out of service on Monday after punctures were discovered on the wing following a flight from Medellín to Miami.

Passengers on the American Airlines flight from Colombia to Miami on Monday morning noticed nothing unusual. The Boeing 737 MAX 8 flew at 36,000 feet over the Caribbean, landed in South Florida, and parked at the gate as usual.

Only after everyone got off the plane did anyone realize something was wrong.

During a routine post-flight inspection, technicians discovered puncture marks on the aircraft’s right aileron. Multiple outlets, including AirLive, reported that the damage appeared consistent with bullet holes. The aircraft involved was a two-year-old 737 MAX 8 (reg. N342SX) operating as Flight 924 from José María Córdova International Airport in Medellín (MDE) to Miami International Airport (MIA) on Monday morning, 23 February 2026.

American Airlines confirmed the discovery in a statement.

“Following a routine inspection, our teams identified a puncture to the exterior of one of our aircraft,” a spokesperson said in comments carried by multiple media outlets. “The aircraft was immediately removed from service for further inspection and repair. We will work closely with all relevant authorities to investigate this incident.”

The airline did not say the puncture was caused by gunfire, but it also did not deny reports that described the damage as bullet-related.

Fortunately, the flight itself operated without incident. An American Airlines spokesperson confirmed there were no injuries or problems during the trip back to Miami. FlightAware tracking data showed nothing unusual during the 3-hour, 37-minute flight over the Caribbean.

Ideally, You Don’t Want Bullet Holes in Your Aircraft. But the Ailerons? Oof.

American Airlines 737 MAX 8
An American Airlines 737 Max 8 (N350RV) departs Washington National Airport for Miami on 31 March 2024 | IMAGE: Tim, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

What stands out is the location of the bullet holes.

Reports say the damage was to the right aileron, a sensitive and rather important part of the plane.

A single puncture on the outside does not necessarily mean danger, but airlines obviously take incidents like this extremely seriously. Under the wing’s surface are hydraulic parts, electrical wires, and sometimes fuel tanks. Even if the damage appears small, engineers need to ensure that nothing inside was damaged.

After landing at MIA, maintenance crews installed a temporary patch over the damaged area to stabilize it for a ferry flight that evening to American’s main maintenance hub at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (DFW), where it will stay grounded while undergoing repairs.

But When and Where Did It Happen?

José María Córdova International Airport in Medellín (MDE), Colombia
José María Córdova International Airport in Medellín (MDE), Colombia | IMAGE: By Felipe Restrepo Acosta – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69247292

One of the main questions is when the damage happened. And where.

The aircraft flew from MIA to MDE as Flight 923 on Sunday evening and remained overnight in Colombia before the return trip to Florida the next morning. Some reports say the puncture might have been noticed in Medellín during a routine pre-departure check, while others say it was confirmed in Miami after landing. We do not want to speculate, but it seems highly unlikely the crew knew about the damage before leaving Medellín.

Right now, it is not clear if the damage happened while the plane was parked or during a low-altitude part of the flight. American Airlines says it is working with authorities to investigate.

This incident reminds many of similar instances in late 2024, when several aircraft were hit by bullets while flying in and out of Port-au-Prince, Haiti. In those cases, the damage was also found after landing, and American Airlines later indefinitely suspended flights to Haiti.

So far, no similar changes have been announced for Colombia.

Transport Canada Advances Gulfstream Certification After Trump’s Tariff Threat

For several years, Transport Canada’s Gulfstream certification process was mainly a technical matter. It was discussed in data sheets, compliance documents, and official communications between regulators.

President Donald Trump posted on his Truth Social account on 29 January 2026, threatening tariffs on Bombardier if Transport Canada does not approve Gulfstream certification

But recently, it became a political issue.

On 29 January, President Donald Trump publicly accused Canada of “wrongfully, illegally, and steadfastly” refusing to certify four Gulfstream models: the G500, G600, G700, and G800. In a Truth Social post, he warned that unless the situation was “immediately corrected,” the United States would impose a 50% tariff on Canadian-built aircraft and “decertify” Bombardier jets operating in the US.

Trump’s statement quickly turned the ongoing validation process into a major issue between the two countries. Since then, three key developments have shaped the situation.

The G500 and G600 Are Now Approved in Canada

G500/600
IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace

The biggest and simplest change is that the Gulfstream G500 and G600 are now certified for registration in Canada.

On 15 February 2026, Transport Canada approved type certificate validations for both planes, as shown in a government data sheet made public on 20 February. This decision ends a review process that lasted for years.

Validation is different from initial certification. The FAA certified the G500 in 2018 and the G600 in 2019. According to international aviation rules, the country where the plane is designed—in this case, the United States—issues the main certificate. Other countries then review and validate it before allowing local registration.

These validations do not happen automatically. Regulators may ask for more information or do their own analysis. In this case, the long process meant Canadian operators could not register the G500 and G600 in Canada, although US-registered planes could still fly in Canadian airspace.

With the approvals in February, that issue has been resolved.

The G700 and G800 Remain Pending Over Fuel-Icing Compliance

G700
G700 in flight | IMAGE: Gulfstream Aerospace

The situation is more complicated for the Gulfstream G700 and G800.

The FAA certificated the G700 in March 2024 and the G800 in April 2025. However, those approvals included a time-limited exemption related to fuel system icing compliance under US regulations. FAA Exemption No. 21744 permits Gulfstream to complete full-scale fuel icing testing on an extended timeline while continuing deliveries and operations. The FAA has stated the exemption maintains an equivalent level of safety, with certification testing required by mid-2026 and full compliance documentation due by the end of 2026.

Transport Canada has not agreed to that exemption.

Canadian regulators want more proof that the planes can handle fuel-system icing, which is especially important in Canada’s climate. Reports say this is not because of any safety incidents. It is a matter of meeting rules and showing compliance, not a current safety problem.

Until Transport Canada finishes its review, Canadian operators cannot register the G700 or G800 in Canada. However, planes registered in other countries can still fly in Canadian airspace under international rules.

The Gulfstream Certification Process Became Entangled in Broader Trade Tensions

The third development is not about any one aircraft model, but about the certification system as a whole.

Trump’s 29 January post directly targeted Montréal-based Bombardier, a major competitor to Gulfstream, threatening tariffs and decertification. According to aviation data provider Cirium, 2,678 Canadian-built Bombardier aircraft are registered in the United States.

These comments came at a time when trade relations between Washington and Ottawa were already tense. Aerospace is important to both economies, and their supply chains are closely connected. Certification agreements depend on both sides trusting each other’s technical standards.

This is why many people in the industry reacted strongly. Aircraft certification is supposed to focus on safety and be handled directly between regulators. While timelines and technical disagreements can happen, these issues are usually worked out through established technical processes.

When certification is discussed publicly along with tariff threats, it raises a big concern: could political pressure affect decisions that are supposed to stay separate from trade disputes?

For now, the system seems to be holding. The G500 and G600 are approved in Canada, while the G700 and G800 are still being reviewed. The threatened tariffs and decertifications have not happened.

This situation showed how much global aviation relies on trust between regulators. They may not always agree, but they respect each other’s processes. When politics starts to get involved, even just in words, that trust can be shaken. This time, the system stayed strong.

But it was put to the test.

USAir Flight 499: Snow, Tailwind, and a Runway That Ran Out

Forty years after USAir Flight 499 overran a snowy runway in Erie, Pennsylvania, we examine how tailwind, speed, and snow combined to narrow the margins.

On the morning of 21 February 1986, USAir Flight 499 was approaching Erie International Airport (ERI) in Pennsylvania’s northwestern corner in instrument conditions that left little room for error. Snow was falling. The ceiling hovered at 200 feet. Visibility was 0.5 miles. Braking action had been reported fair to poor.

Within seconds of touchdown, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9-31 would slide off the end of runway 24, overrun a runway end light, break through a fence, and come to rest on a busy road 180 feet beyond the pavement, narrowly missing several vehicles on their Friday morning commute.

There were 23 people on board. One passenger sustained a minor head injury. There were no fatalities. But the accident became a clear case study in winter performance margins and operational decision making.

The Airplane and the Mission

N961VJ, the DC-9 involved in the 1986 crash of USAir Flight 499 in Erie, Pennsylvania.
N961VJ, the DC-9 involved in the 1986 crash of USAir Flight 499 in Erie, Pennsylvania | IMAGE: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives

The aircraft was DC-9-31 (reg. N961VJ), MSN 47506, delivered to Allegheny Airlines (USAir’s predecessor) in 1970 and powered by Pratt & Whitney JT8D-7B engines. By February 1986, it had accumulated more than 42,000 airframe hours.

Flight 499 was operating that morning on a routine flight from Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ) to what was then Greater Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), with an intermediate stop in Erie. The captain had approximately 8,900 total flight hours, including 5,900 in the DC-9. The first officer (FO) had logged 4,880 hours total, 2,420 in type. Both were current and properly qualified.

The accident occurred at approximately 0858 local time during landing.

A Runway Slowly Deteriorating

A USAir DC-9 flies over the USAir Flight 499 crash site as it departs Erie International Airport (ERI) on 22 February 1986.
A USAir DC-9 flies over the USAir Flight 499 crash site as it departs Erie International Airport (ERI) on 22 February 1986, one day after the crash. | IMAGE: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives

Weather that morning was marginal from the outset. A special observation issued at 0650 reported a 300-foot overcast ceiling, 1.5 miles visibility in light snow and fog, temperature and dewpoint both at freezing, and wind 030º at 10 knots.

More significant than the ceiling was the runway condition. Runway 06/24 had been plowed, but only one snowplow was operational that morning. The operator acknowledged it typically left roughly one-quarter inch of snow behind. At 0715, braking action was checked with a decelerometer, which indicated fair to poor conditions.

The crew, who dutied in in Toronto around 0700, discussed the weather conditions. According to the NTSB report, the captain acknowledged that the weather in Erie was “not too good.” They determined that the fuel load was sufficient to hold if necessary and proceeded with the short 23-minute flight across Lake Erie as planned. Flight 499 pushed back from the gate at YYZ at 0756, 28 minutes behind schedule.

A Beechcraft King Air that landed around 0745 reported braking action as poor and estimated one to two inches of wet snow on the runway, with no bare spots visible. When that aircraft departed around 0815, the pilot still observed no exposed pavement and estimated roughly one-half inch of snow even on plowed sections.

Plowing was halted at 0820 in anticipation of Flight 499’s arrival. No sand or chemical treatment was applied. Light to moderate snow continued falling and intensified shortly before landing. No further plowing occurred for nearly 40 minutes.

By the time the DC-9 arrived on final, the runway was entirely snow-covered.

Runway 06 Out of Reach

Evacuation slides deployed after the crash of USAir Flight 499
Evacuation slides deployed after the crash of USAir Flight 499 | IMAGE: Bureau of Aircraft Accidents Archives

The crew initially planned an ILS approach to runway 06. However, runway visual range (RVR) was reported at 2,800 feet, well below the required 4,000-foot minimum.

The captain elected to hold at 10,000 feet. Dispatch advised that if runway 06 minimums could not be met and landing on runway 24 with a tailwind was not authorized, the flight should continue to Pittsburgh.

Runway 24 required one-half mile visibility and was not equipped with RVR sensors. Reported visibility matched that minimum. At the suggestion of USAir’s Erie Ops, the crew requested an ILS approach to runway 24.

Initially, they believed winds were 330 at 9, effectively a crosswind near their allowable limit under reduced visibility conditions. But updated wind reports told a different story.

ERI Tower advised winds 010 at 10 knots. Moments later, winds increased to 15 knots and became variable between 010 and 020. On runway 24, those winds produced a 10 to 11 knot quartering tailwind component.

USAir’s DC-9 Pilots’ Handbook and Jeppesen advisory pages were explicit: tailwind components were not authorized for turbojet aircraft on runway 24 when the runway was wet or slippery. ERI’s runway 24, at just 6,500 feet, was one of five in the system with that restriction.

The crew received multiple wind reports indicating a tailwind component.

On short final, the FO attempted to reference the crosswind and tailwind component chart. The captain instructed him to put it away and focus on altitude callouts.

The airplane continued inbound.

Fast, Long, and Committed

USAir Flight 499 crash site
USAir Flight 499 crash site | IMAGE: NTSB

Flight data recorder (FDR) data showed the DC-9 maintained 130 to 135 knots on final approach, approximately 13 to 18 knots above Vref, which was 117 knots for that landing weight.

The aircraft descended to the 200-foot decision height and remained there for approximately eight seconds before continuing the descent.

At approach speed, eight seconds is significant. The aircraft would have traveled well over 1,500 feet horizontally while holding altitude. In snow-obscured conditions with reduced runway definition, that forward movement shifts the eventual touchdown point.

The FO later stated that he saw the ground approximately 100 feet above decision height. At roughly 50 feet above minimums, he could see the approach lights and runway lighting but could not clearly define the runway surface itself because it was completely snow-covered.

Visual cues were present, but degraded.

Once descent resumed, touchdown occurred long.

FDR analysis placed main gear contact approximately 1,745 feet beyond the displaced threshold. Eyewitness measurements suggested as much as 2,130 feet beyond. In either case, roughly 4,000 to 4,250 feet of the 6,500-foot runway remained.

Both pilots described the touchdown as firm. Spoilers were armed but did not auto-deploy. On a slick, snow-covered surface, insufficient wheel spin-up likely prevented activation.

N961VJ, the DC-9 involved in the USAir Flight 499 crash, was ultimately written off due to damage
N961VJ, the DC-9 involved in the USAir Flight 499 crash, was ultimately written off due to damage | IMAGE: NTSB

There was a seven-second delay before the nose gear contacted the runway. During that interval, the aircraft traveled an additional 1,200 to 1,400 feet.

The captain manually deployed the spoilers, lowered the nose, selected reverse thrust, and applied braking. He later reported that reverse thrust slowed the aircraft, but braking was not effective.

The DC-9 drifted left and exited the runway surface at approximately 44 knots. It ran over a runway end identifier light, struck a chain-link fence, descended a 20-foot embankment, and came to rest straddling a road 180 feet beyond the runway end.

Evacuation was textbook: Flight attendants deployed the forward slide, ushering passengers off the aircraft. The crew secured the cockpit, checked for leaks (none), and notified the tower. The DC-9 was substantially damaged and later written off.

The Arithmetic of Stopping

USAir Flight 499 crash site
USAir Flight 499 crash site | IMAGE: Jolly Rogers Images

Douglas Aircraft and NTSB analysis determined that approximately 4,087 feet of stopping distance were required from the point of main gear touchdown under the existing configuration, tailwind, excess speed, and runway condition. That figure included the seven-second delay before nose lowering.

Had the nose been lowered immediately, allowing spoilers to deploy upon nose gear compression and reverse thrust to be applied without delay, stopping distance could have been reduced to roughly 2,750 feet.

Even so, company policy explicitly prohibited landing on runway 24 with any tailwind component when the runway was wet or slippery.

Erie newspaper announces the crash of USAir Flight 499
Local media reports the crash of USAir Flight 499 | IMAGE: Erie Times News

In the end, the NTSB concluded that the crash of Flight 499 was not the result of one mistake. It was a cascade.

The tailwind restriction was overlooked. The approach was flown fast. The aircraft floated at decision height. Touchdown came long. Deceleration was not optimal.

The DC-9 handbook had addressed nearly every one of those variables. It warned that the first 2,000 feet on a slush-covered runway are the most critical because hydroplaning reduces braking effectiveness. It emphasized monitoring spoilers on slippery surfaces, since automatic deployment depends on wheel spin-up or nose gear compression. It outlined strict limitations for wet snow operations.

The crew had the information. But weather, shifting winds, and short-final workload blurred the lines between procedure and execution.

The dispatcher, relying on the wind information relayed by the crew, deferred to their on-scene judgment, as company protocols require. Air traffic control provided all available weather updates. Nav aids checked out post-accident. No mechanical discrepancies were found.

What remained was performance math.

A Personal Footnote, Forty Years Later

The fuselage of the stricken DC-9 was removed from the roadway via crane
The fuselage of the stricken DC-9 was removed from the roadway via construction crane two days after the accident | IMAGE: Daniel Wolfe via Erie History & Memorabilia on Facebook

I was seven years old when Flight 499 slid off the end of runway 24. It happened just three miles from my childhood home. As a kid already obsessed with aviation, I remember watching the coverage and following every detail of the cleanup and investigation. My dad drove me to the accident site multiple times, and we were there when the DC-9 was lifted from the roadway by crane.

Front page of the Erie Times News on 23 February 1986 announcing the stricken airliner would be removed from the roadway with a giant construction crane
Front page of the Erie Times News on 23 February 1986 announcing the stricken airliner would be removed from the roadway with a giant construction crane | IMAGE: Erie Times News

Less than a month earlier, the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster had shaken the nation and dominated headlines across the world. That event brought national grief. Flight 499 barely registered in the national headlines of the day. Outside of Erie, few people likely remember it. No one was killed. Only one passenger was injured.

But locally, it was unforgettable. For a young boy already fixated on aviation, it became one of those early memories that quietly and permanently imprints itself.

Looking back four decades later, it is hard not to see how that snowy winter morning deepened my fascination with aviation. Not because of spectacle, but because of the discipline behind it. Performance charts. Tailwind limitations. Runway contamination. The unforgiving math of stopping distance.

Thankfully, Flight 499 did not end in tragedy. 

But on a snowy morning in Erie, the lessons learned from USAir Flight 499 reinforce the hard truth that in aviation, margins are never abstract. And in winter conditions especially, every inch and every knot counts.

Erie TV News Archives on the Crash of USAir Flight 499

Tweed New Haven Airport: A Century of Growth, Setbacks, and Modern Expansion

Tweed New Haven Airport has weathered controversy, airline departures, and decades of uncertainty. Today, HVN is experiencing a dramatic resurgence driven by low-cost carriers and major expansion plans.

Jack Tweed flying
Jack Tweed flying in his airplane | IMAGE: Tweed New Haven Regional Airport

The seed for New Haven’s own airport was planted almost literally in 1929 when a locally built Viking, piloted by Jack Tweed, disgorged a parachutist who landed on a designated spot and handed then-Major Thomas H. Tulley and Governor John H. Trumbull a gold and silver spade with which both first broke ground on what would expand into a 220-acre facility.

The pilot eventually became New Haven Municipal Airport’s first manager, a post he held for three decades.

1950 Aerial view of Tweed New Haven Airport
Aerial view of Tweed New Haven Airport in 1950 | IMAGE: Tweed New Haven Regional Airport

Expansion, the result of a commission Mayor David E. Fitzgerald established in 1922, led to a 394-acre facility with two runways.

In 1961, it was renamed Tweed–New Haven Airport (HVN) in honor of its first manager. Like countless other local community airfields, HVN performed a delicate balancing act, providing air connections to residents to avoid the long drive to New York airports such as Westchester County Airport (HPN), LaGuardia Airport (LGA), and John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), while quelling noise and expansion protests and attempting to attract carriers to a destination with a limited market base.

Service, Controversy, and Carrier Turnover

A busy day on the ramp at Tweed New Haven Airport in 1997
A busy day on the ramp at Tweed New Haven Airport in 1997 | IMAGE: Tweed New Haven Regional Airport

“(The airport) has been the subject of controversy, largely stemming from the competing interests of a New Haven government and business community wanting more air service and sometimes pushing for a longer runway and residential neighbors wanting a peaceful existence and no expansion,” according to Mark Zaretsky in “Tweed-New Haven Regional Airport Celebrates 80 Years After Taking Flight,” New Haven Register, 28 September 2011.

Also like other regional airports, HVN rode a roller coaster when it came to carrier service, airlines entering with promise but leaving with disappointment when load factors and revenues fell short, operating a variety of commuter turboprop and mainline jet aircraft.

New Haven Airways timetable from 15 February 1980
New Haven Airways timetable from 15 February 1980 | IMAGE: Airline Timetable Images (from the collection of Björn Larsson)
Cover of New Haven Airways timetable from 15 February 1980
Cover of New Haven Airways timetable from 15 February 1980 | IMAGE: Airline Timetable Images (from the collection of Björn Larsson)

Although Robinson Aviation was its first fixed-base operator (FBO), LiCon (for “Long Island–Connecticut”) Airways inaugurated the airport’s first scheduled service, providing air access from November 1933 to July 1934. Seeking to address the need for a permanent scheduled carrier, the airport fostered its own indigenous operator, New Haven Airways (later NewAir). The airline ultimately connected coastal Connecticut with JFK and LGA, as well as Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) and service to Washington via Baltimore/Washington International Airport (BWI) and Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA).

The major airlines, particularly American, which inaugurated service as early as the fall of 1934, along with Eastern and Allegheny, eventually alighted at the airfield. Pilgrim also provided cross–Long Island Sound service to JFK, among other destinations, between 1967 and 1985.

By the mid-1990s, the number of airlines peaked at four before gradually dwindling to one, as US Airways Express became the sole operator with flights to PHL and DCA, and finally to none.

Renewed Service and Modern Growth

Celebrating the inaugural Avelo Airlines flight at HVN
Celebrating the inaugural Avelo Airlines flight from HVN on 3 November 2021 | IMAGE: AVELOAIR.COM

That changed on 3 November 2021, when low-fare carrier Avelo Airlines launched operations with Boeing 737-700 and 737-800 aircraft, inaugurating service to Orlando International Airport (MCO). Additional Florida destinations soon followed, including Fort Lauderdale–Hollywood International Airport (FLL), Southwest Florida International Airport (RSW), Tampa International Airport (TPA), and Palm Beach International Airport (PBI).

Momentum accelerated in late 2024 when Breeze Airways, another low-cost carrier and a direct competitor to Avelo, began service from HVN. It marked the first time in more than two decades that HVN hosted more than one airline. Today, between Avelo and Breeze, 36 nonstop destinations are served from HVN, according to the airport’s website, and annual passenger volume reached 1.4 million in 2025, representing a 14.5-fold increase over 2019 levels.

Expansion and the East Terminal Project

Artist rendering of new East Terminal at Tweed New Haven Airport (HVN)
Artist rendering of new East Terminal at Tweed New Haven Airport (HVN) | IMAGE: Tweed New Haven Regional Airport

To accommodate this explosive growth, HVN, with its single 5,600-foot Runway 2/20, has embarked upon a $70 million privately funded expansion plan that will ultimately lead to a modern, 84,000-square-foot, six-gate elevated terminal. In addition, plans call for a 975-foot runway extension.

The project is designed to improve flood resilience while supporting projected passenger demand through 2040. Plans also include restoration of more than 32 acres of tidal wetlands, preservation of 25 acres of grassland habitat, and operational adjustments intended to shift aircraft activity away from nearby residential neighborhoods.

44 Years Later, the Boeing 757 is Still a Powerhouse in the Skies

1

The Boeing 757 is still flying after 44 years of service.

It is clearly an older design and faces competition from other manufacturers with newer aircraft. However, the 757 has some design features that still make it a capable performer with definite advantages over more modern passenger jets.

The Boeing 757 is Still Flying After First Flights in 1982

Boeing developed the 757 to replace the 727, with the first 757 taking flight on 19 February 1982. There were two main variants: the 757-200 and 757-300. Boeing built 1050 of the jets for 54 different customers before ending production in 2004.

A Delta 757 at the Zurich, Switzerland Airport. | Image: Aero Icarus
A Delta Boeing 757 at Zurich Airport (ZRH) in Switzerland. | Image: Aero Icarus

The aircraft, sometimes called the “Flying Pencil” or “Giraffe,” has a narrow fuselage with a single aisle. The -200 model is 155 feet long with a wingspan of 125 feet. It has a range of 4050 miles and can carry as many as 240 passengers.

The 757-300 model is longer at 178 feet. Boeing added length in front of and behind the wings, making it the longest single-aisle passenger jet with twin engines ever built. Its range is 3900 miles, but it sacrificed some of its range to carry up to 295 passengers.

Powerful Engines Give 757 Advantages Over Other Aircraft

The 757 models have had two engine types: the Rolls Royce RB211 and the Pratt and Whitney PW2037. The RB211 can produce 43,500 pounds of thrust, and the PW2037 can put out 42,000 pounds. These engines, which by some accounts make the aircraft “overpowered,” have led to yet another nickname: the “Ferrari of the skies.”

A United Airlines Boeing 757-200 undergoing maintenance. | Image: Imgur.com
A United Airlines Boeing 757-200 undergoing maintenance. The Boeing 757 Design is still Flying after 43 Years. | Image: Imgur.com

The power from these engines gives the aircraft some key advantages over other models. First, it can take off from relatively short runways. For example, it can operate from the 5,700-foot runway at the John Wayne Airport in Santa Ana, California (SNA). It also has enough power to take off fully loaded from the Eagle County Regional Airport (EGE) in Vail, Colorado, which sits at an altitude of 6,547 feet.

Unique Wing Design Features of the 757

The 757 is still flying today, partly because of two key features of its wing design. Boeing originally built the aircraft for short routes and operations at smaller airports—not long-haul cruising.

To support this, they gave the 757 wider wings that provide better lift and stronger climb performance. Unlike the swept wings found on long-range jets designed for higher speeds, the 757’s wings prioritize lift over speed. Swept wings reduce drag at high speeds, but the 757’s design focused on short-field performance instead.

Despite this difference in wing position, the 757 is still flying thanks to a feature called a “supercritical wing,” which gives it as much or more of the range and speed of aircraft with swept back wings. Richard Whitcomb, an aerodynamicist with NASA, invented the supercritical wing. He came up with the initial concept in 1964 when he was studying how to reduce the shock wave that forms around an aircraft’s wing as it approaches the speed of sound. This shock wave produces drag, which makes it difficult for aircraft to reach higher speeds.

A Delta 757 Taking Off. | Image: Creative Commons
A Delta Boeing 757 Taking Off. | Image: Creative Commons

Whitcomb’s initial idea was to change the shape of a wing so that it would not produce the same shock wave as other designs. To test this, he applied auto-body putty to add bulk to certain areas of the wing, flattening the top and giving the trailing edge a bigger downward curve, especially on its bottom.

Supercritical Wing Design Provides Added Lift and Efficiency

NASA conducted wind tunnel tests that proved the effectiveness of the supercritical wing. Not only did they find it produced better lift, but the increased lift also improved fuel efficiency, as an aircraft with it would require less fuel and engine power to take off and stay in the air.

The US Air Force also studied supercritical wing design and tested it on the F-111 until 1975. Air Force testing indicated the concept would produce 30 percent more lift than conventional wings.

In the years following these early tests, manufacturers including Rockwell, Canadair, Lear, and Dassault used supercritical wings on their aircraft. In addition, all Boeing commercial and military aircraft make use of it.

The supercritical wing enabled the 757 to fly farther and more efficiently. Airlines began using it for more than just short hops. Some of its longer routes have included flights from Newark to Edinburgh, Scotland; Minneapolis to Reykjavik; Raleigh to Paris; and Atlanta to Anchorage.

Boeing 757 is Still Flying With Major Airlines

Today, the Boeing 757 is still flying with Delta, United, and Icelandair, among others. Delta has 90 (as of early 2026) of the aircraft, the most of any airline. The company has a long history of using the 757, having received the 500th aircraft in 1992 and still owns the last one, which was manufactured in 2005.

The Atlanta-based carrier also has the distinction of operating the oldest commercial passenger jet in the US. Delivered to Delta Air Lines nearly 37 years ago, the Boeing 757-232 (reg. N649DL) shows no signs of slowing down. Besides a short stint with Delta’s low-cost subsidiary Song in the early 2000s, N649DL has flown for Delta its entire life.

The Airbus A321XLR is a Possible Replacement, but Lacks the Passenger Capacity of the 757. | Image: Airbus
The Airbus A321XLR is a Possible Replacement, but Lacks the Passenger Capacity of the Boeing 757. | Image: Airbus

Some companies are beginning to phase out the 757. United is starting to replace it on certain routes with widebody Boeing 767-300s and the Airbus A321XLR, which it introduced in 2018. The A321XLR has more range, up to 5000 nautical miles, than the 757. However, its passenger capacity is just 206.

Airlines will need to weigh the tradeoff between range and capacity when deciding whether to retire the aging 757. For now, though, the 757 remains a reliable workhorse in many fleets.

The New Air Force One Livery Is Back: VC-25B and Executive Fleet to Get Trump-Era Design After All 

The new Air Force One livery is back after being rejected in 2022. The VC-25B and other executive aircraft will now wear the red, white, and dark blue design.

The US Air Force has confirmed that the next generation of presidential aircraft will wear a red, white, dark blue, and gold paint scheme first proposed during President Donald Trump’s initial term in office. The decision marks a reversal of a 2022 decision to shelve that same design due to cost and engineering concerns.

The new livery will appear on the pair of Boeing 747-8 aircraft designated VC-25B, which are currently undergoing extensive modification to replace the aging VC-25A fleet. It will also be applied to other executive airlift aircraft, including a 747-8i recently transferred from Qatar for conversion and four Boeing 757-based C-32 aircraft during scheduled maintenance cycles. Eagle-eyed spotters have taken to social media this week, posting images of the updated livery on at least one of the C-32s. 

An Air Force spokesperson told multiple outlets that the service is “implementing a new paint scheme requirement” for the VC-25B and portions of the executive airlift fleet, specifying the red, white, gold, and dark blue palette. The first repainted C-32 is expected to return to service in the coming months.

The look itself is familiar to anyone who followed the Air Force One redesign debate in 2018 and 2019. At the time, President Trump publicly described his vision for a “red, white, and blue” aircraft that would be “top of the line.” Renderings released during his first term showed a darker blue underside, bold red accents, and gold striping, a sharp visual departure from the pale blue scheme that has defined Air Force One since the early 1960s.

That classic design, created during President John F. Kennedy’s administration with the input of industrial designer Raymond Loewy, has remained largely unchanged for more than six decades. Its robin’s egg blue cheatline and restrained typography became part of the aircraft’s global identity, recognizable on every continent.

Why It Was Scrapped in 2022

New Air Force One livery
Rendering of the new Air Force One livery | IMAGE: Boeing

In 2022, the Air Force announced it would not move forward with the darker color scheme. A spokesperson at the time said further analysis found that deeper hues on portions of the aircraft could lead to higher surface temperatures, potentially exceeding certification limits for certain components. Officials also cited added engineering work, schedule impacts, and cost considerations as factors in the decision.

New renderings unveiled in 2023 reflected a revised approach that closely resembled the Kennedy-era livery, albeit with subtle updates to the shade of blue.

Now, following President Trump’s return to office, the Air Force has reversed course once again. The service has not publicly detailed how earlier thermal or cost concerns were mitigated, but it has confirmed that the red, white, gold, and dark blue scheme will be applied to the VC-25B fleet and select C-32 aircraft.

The back-and-forth highlights how even a paint scheme on a highly specialized aircraft is subject to engineering realities. Modern executive airlift jets are packed with antennas, hardened electronics, and mission systems. Surface coatings are not merely aesthetic. They can influence thermal performance, radar signature considerations, and long-term maintenance cycles.

A Fleet-Wide Shift

C-32A (reg. 99-0003) featuring the updated livery on approach to Majors Airport (GVT) in Greenville, Texas
C-32A (reg. 99-0003) featuring the updated livery on approach to Majors Airport (GVT) in Greenville, Texas | IMAGE: @tt33operator via X

The new Air Force One livery is not limited to the future Air Force One jets.

One C-32A, serial number 99-0003, was recently spotted at Majors Airport in Greenville, Texas, wearing the new livery after work at L3Harris’ Mission Integration facility (the same facility where the ex-Qatari 747 is undergoing modifications). The aircraft had arrived in late 2025 in its traditional white-over-blue scheme and was later seen stripped of paint before reemerging in the updated colors. The jet carries a large American flag on the tail and prominent “United States of America” titling along the fuselage.

The Air Force operates eight C-32As, commonly referred to as Air Force Two when transporting the Vice President, though they are also used by the President, cabinet officials, and senior diplomats. According to the service, four of these aircraft will receive the new paint during regularly scheduled depot maintenance.

United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Boeing 737 MAX 8 BBJ
United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Boeing 737 MAX 8 BBJ featuring the updated livery

Elsewhere in the federal fleet, similar red, white, and dark blue schemes have appeared on a Department of Homeland Security Boeing Business Jet and on new Gulfstream 700 aircraft delivered to the US Coast Guard for long-range command and control missions.

Taken together, the visual transformation suggests an emerging standardization across executive airlift platforms, at least for the foreseeable future.

USCG Gulfstream G700 featuring new livery
USCG Gulfstream G700 featuring new livery | IMAGE: Lennon Popp @_l3m0nphotography_ via Instagram

More Than Just Paint

Air Force One
Air Force One refuels at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, on President Donald Trump’s return to Washington D.C. from the North Korea summit, June 12, 2018. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Brittany A. Chase)

Technically, “Air Force One” is a call sign used for any Air Force aircraft carrying the President. In practice, it has come to refer to the two VC-25A aircraft, tail numbers 28000 and 29000, that have served since 1990. Those jets are based on the Boeing 747-200B and are operated by the Presidential Airlift Group at Joint Base Andrews.

Their successors, the VC-25B aircraft based on the 747-8i, are being extensively modified with secure communications, defensive systems, and mission equipment that allow them to function as airborne command centers. The Air Force has also acquired additional 747 airframes for training and spare parts support as the long-delayed program moves forward.

Whether in pale blue or dark navy, the aircraft that carries the President remains one of the most recognizable symbols of American airpower and continuity of government. Its appearance is instantly identifiable, from the presidential seal near the nose to the bold “United States of America” script along the fuselage.


MORE ABOUT AIR FORCE ONE ON AVGEEKERY

The reinstated livery decision adds another chapter to the long visual history of presidential flight. From the propeller-driven VC-54 “Sacred Cow” of the 1940s to today’s 747s and tomorrow’s VC-25Bs, the mission has remained constant even as the paint evolves.

As political tides shift, so too may opinions about how America’s most recognizable aircraft should look. Few in the aviation community (and beyond) would welcome an endless repaint cycle. Whatever colors ultimately prevail, the jet that flies under the Air Force One call sign will continue to embody the office it serves, from Joint Base Andrews to the farthest corners of the globe.

New Air Force One livery
IMAGE: Boeing

“Working 9 to 5” Goes Airborne on Themed Allegiant Flight to Dollywood

Dollywood travelers can clock out and board Flight 925, Allegiant’s Dolly Parton-themed route to the Smokies.


The guitar riff is unmistakable. The coffee is strong. The alarm clock is judging you.

For decades, Dolly Parton’s “9 to 5” has been the unofficial anthem of the working grind. This November, though, one airline is flipping the script by turning clock-in time into departure time.

On 6 November 2026, Allegiant Air will operate Flight 925 from Orlando Sanford International Airport (SFB) to McGhee Tyson Airport (TYS) — a not-so-subtle nod to Dolly’s 1980 hit. The carrier has dubbed it “Destination Dollywood,” and yes, the flight number is the whole point (9 to 5…Flight 925…get it?).

According to Allegiant’s announcement, this won’t be a standard board-and-go affair. Themed gate celebrations at SFB will feature live entertainment direct from the park, trivia, specialty food and drinks, and exclusive merchandise. The festivities continue onboard, turning what is normally a straightforward Florida-to-Tennessee hop into a flying pre-party for the Smokies.

Dollywood Smoky Mountain Christmas
Entrance to the Dollywood Smoky Mountain Christmas | IMAGE: Dollywood

Passengers who also purchase admission to Dollywood will receive additional perks the following day – 7 November – during Smoky Mountain Christmas, including complimentary exclusive ride time, reserved show seating, special treats, and other surprises. Dollywood’s Smoky Mountain Christmas has been named Best Theme Park Christmas Event 15 times by Amusement Today’s Golden Ticket Awards, according to the park.

“Flight 925 is all about embracing the joy of travel,” Drew Wells, Allegiant’s Chief Commercial Officer, said in the announcement. “Partnering with Dollywood Parks & Resorts allows us to deliver a unique experience that reflects the best of both brands: great value, unforgettable moments, and the chance to create memories from the second you step on board.”

Flight 925 is all about embracing the joy of travel.

Drew Wells | Allegiant COO

Eugene Naughton, President of Dollywood Parks & Resorts, called it the park’s first-ever themed flight collaboration. Guests aboard Flight 925, he said, will enjoy “a fast—and fun—way to reach the Smokies,” including access to the new NightFlight Expedition coaster and a Christmas festival featuring more than six million lights.

Travelers who want the full experience can also book discounted lodging at Dollywood’s DreamMore Resort and Spa or HeartSong Lodge & Resort, with up to 25 percent off Nov. 6 and 7 stays, a $100 resort credit, two park tickets with complimentary TimeSavers, and trolley transportation to the park.

A Leisure Airline Doing Leisure Things

Allegiant Livery
IMAGE: Allegiant

Strip away the rhinestones, and it’s still classic Allegiant.

Founded in 1997, the Las Vegas-based airline built its business model around nonstop leisure routes linking smaller cities to vacation destinations. Knoxville has been one of Allegiant’s operating bases since 2018, making a Smoky Mountains tie-in feel less like a marketing stunt and more like brand consistency.

The announcement also lands during a major corporate chapter. In January 2026, Allegiant Travel Company revealed an agreement to acquire Sun Country Airlines in a cash-and-stock transaction valued at approximately $1.5 billion. The merger is expected to close in the second half of 2026 pending shareholder and regulatory approval. Until a single FAA operating certificate is issued, both airlines will continue operating separately.

Clock Out. Board 925.

Ad from Allegiant promoting Flight 925 to Dollywood
Ad from Allegiant promoting Flight 925 to Dollywood | IMAGE: Allegiant

Allegiant also extended its schedule through November 2026 as part of the announcement, giving travelers a chance to begin planning holiday season travel. I know, I know…it’s only February. But, as John F. Kennedy once said, the best time to repair a roof is when the sun is shining. 

Flight #925 isn’t really about network strategy or corporate filings. It’s about the moment the boarding door closes, the engines spool, and the workday fades somewhere below FL300.

For one November departure, “working 9 to 5” becomes flying 925. The Smokies are waiting.

Before ETOPS: The Ambitious Twin-Engine L-1011 That Never Flew

The twin-engine L-1011 was studied long before ETOPS reshaped aviation. Here’s why Lockheed’s TwinStar concept never flew.

The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar is remembered as one of the most technologically ambitious widebodies of its era. Its quiet cabin, advanced autoland capability, and distinctive S-duct made it one of the most recognizable airliners of the 1970s and 1980s.

But did you know that the TriStar began as a twin-engine concept?

In response to American Airlines’ 1966 requirement for a widebody domestic airliner, Southern California neighbors Lockheed and McDonnell Douglas jumped at the opportunity. While McDonnell Douglas began planning for what would eventually become the DC-10, Lockheed initially studied a twinjet design sometimes referred to in company materials as the CL-1011 (the “CL” stood for California Lockheed). The concept envisioned a short- to medium-haul twin-aisle aircraft powered by two high-bypass turbofans.

Very early concept of a twin-engine L-1011
Very early concept of a twin-engine L-1011 | IMAGE: Lockheed/Flight Path Museum Archives

However, engine technology and regulatory constraints shaped the final configuration. Powerplant technology at the time was still maturing in terms of thrust and reliability. At the same time, the FAA’s “60-minute rule” limited twin-engine aircraft to routes within 60 minutes of a diversion airport. For airlines seeking maximum route flexibility, particularly overwater or transcontinental segments, this restriction was significant. Performance requirements for hot-and-high airports and shorter runways also weighed heavily.

Lockheed ultimately adopted a trijet configuration, adding the tail-mounted engine and S-duct that became the TriStar’s signature feature.

Revisiting the Twin: Early 1970s Studies

Lockheed's comparison of the L-1011 TriStar and the proposed twin-engine -600 variant
Lockheed’s comparison of the L-1011 TriStar and the proposed twin-engine -600 variant | IMAGE: Lockheed

By the early 1970s, engine performance had improved and airline economics were shifting. Several sources indicate that Lockheed revisited the idea of a twin-engine derivative of the TriStar.

TwinStar concept
IMAGE: Lockheed/Flight Path Museum Archives

One study often referenced in enthusiast and archival discussions is the so-called CL-1600 or Model 1600. This appears to have explored removing the center engine from the existing TriStar airframe in pursuit of lower operating costs and simplified maintenance. Period accounts suggest the company believed significant cost reductions could be achieved by eliminating one engine and its associated systems.

Some secondary sources suggest that such concepts may have been informally discussed with carriers including Air Canada, though documentation of formal proposals remains limited in publicly accessible archives.

These studies did not progress to a launched program. Removing the tail engine from an aircraft structurally and aerodynamically optimized around a trijet configuration posed nontrivial engineering challenges.

Airbus A300 prototype
Prototype of the Airbus A300 | IMAGE: San Diego Air and Space Museum

It is worth mentioning that while Lockheed was conceptualizing a widebody twin-engine aircraft based on the TriStar, Airbus Industrie GIE (now Airbus) launched its A300 program. The A300, which closely resembled what a twin-engine TriStar would have looked like, first flew in October 1971 and was introduced into service with Air France in May 1974.

It would become the world’s first twin-engine, twin-aisle, widebody airliner, and featured a 2-4-2 seating configuration. It carried between 250-300 passengers, except up to nearly 370 passengers in a high-density configuration.

The L-1011-600: TwinStar or BiStar

The twin-engine L-1011 concept known as the L-1011-600
The twin-engine L-1011 concept known as the L-1011-600 | IMAGE: Lockheed

The most detailed twin-engine proposal associated with the TriStar is generally identified as the L-1011-600, sometimes referred to in period illustrations and later discussions as the “TwinStar” or “BiStar.”

Developed in the mid-1970s as part of an extended family of projected TriStar variants, the -600 was envisioned as a two-engine widebody optimized for shorter-haul routes. The only member of the L-1011 family to reach production was the Lockheed L-1011-500.

Available summaries of the -600 concept describe:

  • Two underwing Rolls-Royce RB211-524 series engines in the 50,000-pound thrust class
  • Elimination of the center tail engine
  • Wing refinements tailored to twinjet operation
  • Alternative vertical stabilizer studies, including a faired-over S-duct configuration and a more conventional twinjet-style fin
Conceptual drawing of a TWA twin-engine L-1011-600
Conceptual drawing of a TWA twin-engine L-1011-600

Proposed seating appears in most accounts as roughly 174 to 200 passengers, with a projected range in the neighborhood of 2,700 nautical miles. These figures should be understood as conceptual targets rather than certified specifications.

Proposed Lockheed TwinStar cutaway
IMAGE: Lockheed/Flight Path Museum Archives

Artist renderings, three-view drawings, and desk models of the -600 circulated during the study period. However, no launch customer emerged, and there is no evidence that the design progressed beyond advanced study and marketing exploration.

So…Why Wasn’t it Built?

A rendering of the twin-engine L-1011 TwinStar concept
A rendering of the twin-engine L-1011 TwinStar concept | IMAGE: Lockheed/Flight Path Museum Archives

The reasons span two distinct eras of aviation development.

Promotional L-1011-600 concept artwork
Promotional L-1011-600 concept artwork | IMAGE: Lockheed

In the 1960s, regulatory restrictions (such as the FAA’s “60 minute rule”) and engine-performance realities favored three- and four-engine configurations for widebody aircraft. By the time engines such as the RB211-524 made high-capacity twinjets more viable, the competitive landscape had changed dramatically.

The Airbus A300 had entered service. The Boeing 767 was on the horizon as a clean-sheet twin optimized from inception for two-engine operation. Meanwhile, the TriStar program had faced significant delays and financial strain, including the well-documented impact of Rolls-Royce’s bankruptcy during engine development.

Airlines evaluating fleet decisions increasingly favored either proven existing types or entirely new-generation aircraft rather than heavily re-engineered variants. Lockheed ultimately chose to withdraw from the commercial airliner market and concentrate on military programs.

As a result, no twin-engine L-1011 was ever built or flown. No production variant was certificated. Later speculative designations and engine upgrade scenarios remain hypothetical and are not supported by documented Lockheed program launches.

The TriStar’s Legacy — And Its Last Flying Example

United Airlines L-1011 over San Francisco
United Airlines briefly operated six Lockheed L-1011-500s from 1986 to 1989 after acquiring them from Pan Am as part of its Pacific division purchase, using them primarily on trans-Pacific routes such as San Francisco to Tokyo and Honolulu. Although United had once ordered the TriStar in the 1970s, it ultimately preferred the DC-10, and the L-1011s were treated as a temporary addition before being sold to Delta Air Lines.

While the TwinStar never materialized, the TriStar itself left a remarkable legacy. It is a legacy we have covered extensively here at Avgeekery.


MORE ABOUT THE TRISTAR ON AVGEEKERY

Built between 1968 and 1984, Lockheed produced around 250 of the type, operated by carriers ranging from TWA and Delta to Cathay Pacific. Despite its advanced design, early engine supplier delays and associated cost overruns slowed entry to market and opened the door for competitors like the McDonnell Douglas DC-10 to win early sales. Lockheed never managed to reach the production volumes it needed for commercial profitability, ultimately withdrawing from the civilian aircraft industry.

Stargazer, the last L-1011 TriStar in operation today
From the F-18 Chase Plane, photos of the Pegasus XL CYGNSS during its first launch attempt on 12/12/2016, ending in a scrub of the mission for the day. Stargazer is the last L-1011 TriStar in operation today | IMAGE: Northrop Grumman

That legacy continues in a unique way: one L-1011 remains airworthy today. The aircraft known as Stargazer — delivered in 1974 and originally operated by Air Canada — has been modified and operated as a peg-launched rocket mothership under companies now part of Northrop Grumman. As of 2026, Stargazer is the only L-1011 still flying and regularly performs missions out of Mojave Air and Space Port (MHV) in California, carrying Pegasus launch vehicles to altitude before release. 

An Aviation What-If

Twin-engine L-1011 concept
Straight out of the atomic age: a conceptual drawing of the proposed twin-engine L-1011 TwinStar | IMAGE: Lockheed/Flight Path Museum Archives

The twin-engine L-1011 remains one of commercial aviation’s more intriguing “what might have been” stories.

The concept was born during a transitional moment in commercial aviation when widebody design philosophy was making the transition from tri- and quad-engine configurations toward the twinjet dominance that would define later decades. The studies were real. The renderings existed. The engineering was explored.

But the market moved faster than the concepts.

In the end, the TriStar’s third engine became its defining trait, and the twin remained a concept confined to drawings, desk models, and the margins of aviation history.

No More DEI: FAA Orders Airlines to Certify Merit-Based Pilot Hiring

The DOT and FAA are requiring airlines to certify that pilot hiring is merit-based in accordance with new federal policy.

US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy on Friday announced that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is issuing a new mandatory Operations Specification (OpSpec) requiring commercial airlines to formally certify that pilot hiring is based exclusively on merit. The directive applies to all certificate holders operating under 14 CFR Part 121, which includes US airlines conducting scheduled passenger and cargo operations.

The new mandate, designated OpSpec A134, is titled “Merit-Based Pilot Hiring.” According to FAA Notice N 8900.767, published 13 February 2026, “The certificate holder shall ensure pilot hiring is exclusively merit-based to fulfill its duty to provide the highest possible degree of safety in the public interest.” The FAA is relying on its authority under 49 U.S.C. § 44701(b) and (d), federal law that allows the agency to establish safety standards for commercial carriers.

What the New OpSpec Requires

OpSpec A134 - Merit-based pilot hiring document from the FAA
OpSpec A134 – Merit-based pilot hiring document | IMAGE: FAA

Under the notice, Principal Operations Inspectors must notify Part 121 carriers within two business days of publication. Airlines may submit written information within seven days. The FAA will then determine whether to adopt, partially adopt, or withdraw the amendment, with OpSpec A134 to be issued no later than 30 days after that determination.

The FAA states in the notice that “operational safety of 14 CFR part 121 air carriers is fundamentally dependent upon the knowledge and proficiency of its flight crewmembers.” It further notes that existing training standards under Part 121 subparts N, O, Y, and appendices E and F establish rigorous qualification requirements, and that effectiveness is enhanced when new hires enter training with a verified baseline of technical knowledge, cognitive skills, and piloting experience aligned with the carrier’s operating environment.

The agency also ties the hiring requirement to Safety Management Systems, stating that merit-based hiring can provide proactive inputs to an operator’s SMS and strengthen risk management processes.

Statements from DOT and FAA Leadership

US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy speaks with air traffic controllers ahead of proposed FAA flight cuts amid the government shutdown
US Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy speaks with air traffic controllers ahead of proposed FAA flight cuts amid the government shutdown | IMAGE: US Department of Transportation

Secretary Duffy framed the announcement around passenger confidence and safety.

“When families board their aircraft, they should fly with confidence knowing the pilot behind the controls is the best of the best,” Duffy said. “The American people don’t care what their pilot looks like or their gender—they just care that they are [the] most qualified man or woman for the job. Safety drives everything we do, and this commonsense measure will increase transparency between passengers and airlines.”

FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford echoed Secretary Duffy’s statement.

“At the FAA, the safety of passengers is our number one priority,” said Bedford. “It is a bare minimum expectation for airlines to hire the most qualified individual when making someone responsible for hundreds of lives at a time. Someone’s race, sex, or creed has nothing to do with their ability to fly and land aircraft safely.”

Someone’s race, sex, or creed has nothing to do with their ability to fly and land aircraft safely.

Bryan Bedford | FAA Administrator

According to the DOT announcement, the action is in accordance with President Donald J. Trump’s Executive Order 14173, titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” as well as a related Presidential Action titled “Keeping Americans Safe in Aviation,” both issued 21 January 2025.

Scope and Context of the Mandate

The OpSpec applies specifically to 14 CFR Part 121 certificate holders, which, in practical terms, covers U.S. carriers operating regularly scheduled commercial passenger and cargo flights. The DOT stated that while the FAA has previously raised performance standards and revised prior directives, “allegations of airlines hiring based on race and sex remain,” prompting the new certification requirement. The department did not cite specific evidence of current non-compliance in its announcement.

Pilot hiring standards have been part of an intense – and sometimes contentious – industry conversation in recent years. As airlines work to address pilot shortages and long-term workforce development, many carriers and aviation organizations have launched programs aimed at expanding access to aviation careers for underrepresented groups. At the same time, some critics have questioned whether diversity-focused initiatives could influence hiring decisions beyond traditional qualification metrics.

That debate has played out across industry conferences, recruiting campaigns, union discussions, and social media, placing pilot hiring squarely in the spotlight well before this latest FAA directive.

For operators and the public, the notice is available through the FAA’s website and the Dynamic Regulatory System. Questions regarding the notice may be directed to the FAA’s Air Transportation Division, according to the publication.

As with all FAA Operations Specifications, OpSpec A134 becomes part of the regulatory framework governing airline operations. The focus, according to both DOT and FAA leadership, remains on safety, qualifications, and maintaining what the agency describes as “the highest possible degree of safety in the public interest.”