Home Blog Page 35

When My KC-10 Crew Witnessed Ramstein Air Base Disaster

0

A KC-10 crew member recalls the somber experience at the “Flugtag ’88” Airshow at Ramstein Air Base.

On 28 August 1988, a KC-10 from the 434th Air Refueling Wing at Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, NC, was on display at Ramstein Air Base for the Flugtag ’88 airshow.

During the show, at 1600 local time, three aircraft from the Italian Air Force demonstration team collided while performing a maneuver. One of the jets exploded and struck the ground and sent a fireball of fuel and fuselage into the spectators and another of the Italian aircraft crashed into an emergency medical evacuation UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter. 

A jet shooting from a planeDescription automatically generated with medium confidence

Thirty-one people and the three pilots died at the scene, and in the weeks after the incident, thirty-six more died, many from severe burns. The final casualty was Captain Kim Strader, the pilot of the UH-60. He died 20 days later, on Saturday, 17 September, at Brooke Army Medical Center in Texas

Three hundred and forty-six spectators also suffered serious injuries, and hundreds more had minor injuries.

My KC-10 Crew Was Safe

Four aircrew members and three crew chiefs from Seymour Johnson were with the KC-10, and several of them had left the main spectator area to get something to eat when the collision occurred.

At first they thought the sound of the explosions was just aircraft in the show performing a simulated bombing run, but when heavy black smoke rose above the trees lining the runway, and they heard people screaming, they knew it was no simulation.

The scene was chaotic at first, with spectators running from the crash area and security and medical personnel rushing towards the fire and smoke. It wasn’t long before the situation was under control, and emergency personnel began treating the victims.

The KC-10 crew members met up at their aircraft and were relieved to discover that none of them had been injured and that their jet had not been damaged.

Italian Demonstration Team Was Experienced

The Italian Air Force demonstration team involved in the involved in the Ramstein Air Base Disaster, the ‘Frecce Tricolori,’ was flying ten Aermacchi MB.339A/PAN jets. This single-engine military trainer and light attack aircraft had a top speed of 588 miles per hour, and the team had been using them since 27 April 1982.

The Italians were performing a maneuver they called the ‘pierced heart’ when the collisions occurred. Two groups of aircraft form a heart shape and pass each other while parallel to the runway as a single aircraft flies through the bottom tip of the heart, “piercing” it. 

A visual depiction of the airshow profile.  Image: Julian Herzog
A visual depiction of the airshow profile. Image: Julian Herzog

On that day, Italian Lieutenant Colonel Ivo Nutarelli was flying the lone jet. He came in low and did not have time to adjust his altitude or slow his aircraft and struck two of the other jets in the formation, although video of the incident showed that he may have been trying to pull up just before the collision.

In the days following the disaster, there were discussions about the about how close spectators at airshows should be to runways and how to best coordinate emergency responses when American and German responders were at a scene together. Discussions that eventually led to significant safety improvements that are now commonplace at every air show with military participants.

Pilot Error Ruled Out at Ramstein Air Base Disaster

Following the disaster, officials from the Italian Air Force ruled out pilot error as a possible cause. Nutarelli was a very experienced pilot, with approximately 4,250 hours in the cockpit. In the 27 years the Frecce Tricolori had been doing the ‘pierced heart’, they had performed it thousands of times without an accident. 

That was not the final word on the incident, as several rumors about its cause began to spread.  In 1991, a German reporter in the newspaper Tageszeitung went as far as suggesting that Nutarelli’s aircraft had crashed due to sabotage, but there has never been any evidence to support his theory.

Others speculated that sabotage could have been in the form of Electro-Magnetic Pulse (EMP) or radio frequency (RF) weapons or less modern methods such a miniature explosive device that someone could have detonated remotely. Like with the newspaper article, no one has presented any evidence that sabotage occurred.

Runway Reopens and KC-10 Heads Back to North Carolina

Throughout the evening and night following the disaster, the KC-10 crew saw and heard helicopters flying from the base carrying victims to hospitals in the area.

The KC-10 was supposed to leave the next day, but base officials halted all fights to allow recovery of victims and the deceased to continue. They also needed time to remove debris from the crashed aircraft and repair the runway.

News about the disaster quickly spread around the world, including to family members and fellow Airmen back at Seymour Johnson. They heard about the crash but had no way of knowing if the KC-10 crew and their aircraft was involved.

In those days before widespread use of the Internet, email, and cell phones, it took several hours for them to call home and reassure everyone that they were all safe.

We eventually made it home

Two days later, when the runway reopened, the KC-10 crew rode a crew bus from base lodging to the aircraft to fly back to North Carolina. Along the way, they saw many cars still in the spectator parking area, no doubt left behind by those killed and injured during the disaster. 

They refueled the KC-10 and got it ready to fly, and as the huge tanker began its roll down the runway, the crew noticed a large, blackened area where the grass had been burned, a final sobering reminder of the disaster.

Memorial to victims of the disaster. Image: USAF Photo
Memorial to victims of the disaster. Image: USAF Photo

This was unfortunately not the only airshow crash involving an Italian military pilot. In 2017, test pilot Gabriel Orlandi crashed and perished at the Terracina Airshow near Rome.

Boeing Actually Tried Rocket Assisted Takeoffs On the 727

It sounds almost too amazing to be true, but Boeing actually tested rockets on the Boeing 727. Their plan wasn’t as crazy as it sounds and it proved to be an ingenious solution to a very real problem.

I’ve always had a soft spot for the Boeing 727. Maybe it was all those flights as kid growing up in the Midwest where we’d board a Braniff Flying Colors 727 out of Wichita and head off to different parts of the country back in the day when you flew Braniff north or south out of Kansas to interline with different airlines to head to the East Coast or West Coast. Flights to the south usually interlined with Continental or American and flights to the north interlined with United, sometimes TWA if I remember right from my youth. But even those flights were 727s, too, and then one day all of a sudden it seems, sometime after September 11, the 727s were all put out to pasture by most of the US majors. I could go on and on (but thankfully won’t) on why I think the 727 is the Chuck Norris of jetliners, but suffice to say for today’s aviation trivia there’s just one feature, though not unique to the 727, adds to that coolness for “Trisaurus Rex”.

There was a JATO option. That’s right. Rocket assisted takeoff. What a shame it wasn’t picked up by everyone else, but it was an option on the 727-200 which of course was a lot heavier than the shorter 727-100. Until the 727-200 Advanced came along and included JT8D engines if increased power, the early 727-200s were a bit short on the power stick due to the heavier weight but essentially the same engines as the -100s.

Now don’t everyone write me, I know the reasons why the JATO option didn’t roll out across the board for most production 727-200s. There were only 12 727-200s that were built with the JATO provision and they were actually the more powerful 727-200 Advanced versions. Mexicana was in a unique position of serving several high-altitude airports in its network where the 727-200 as built would have been payload restricted to account for the possibility of the loss of one of the three engines at takeoff.

As a side track to illustrate that point, at airports at higher elevations, particularly on hot days, wings will generate less lift and jet engines will develop less power than at a lower elevation airport. That’s why the runways at airports like Denver or La Paz, Bolivia, are so long. In fact, back in the 1970s many US airlines didn’t sent the 727-100QC variants to Denver Stapleton Airport as the heavier structural reinforcing of the main deck to handle cargo loads cut into the passenger payload during the summer months.

Mexicana took delivery of twelve 727-200s that got around this limitation by having a JATO installation in the lower aft fuselage just behind the wings. These aircraft could be identified by having a shallow dorsal fairing ahead of the #2 intake that accommodated some of the rerouted avionics and air conditioning ducting that was displaced by the JATO provision. There’s a misconception that this fairing is a reinforcement brace, though.

The aircraft were unofficially designated 727-200/JATO by Boeing and the rocket installation was intended for emergency use only when flying out of a hot and high airport at maximum gross weight. Without the JATO, the aircraft would have to be payload restricted to account for the need to reach a safe altitude in the event of an engine loss after committing to takeoff. By having the JATO provision, Mexicana could operate its 727-200s at full payload. In the event of a loss of engine at past V1, the JATO unit would fire and allow the heavily-laden jet to reach a safe altitude and get aerodynamically cleaned up.

The JATO provision was eventually made obsolete by later developments in the JT8D engine that featured APR- automatic power reserve. It sensed a power decrease from one of the engines failing on takeoff and automatically boosted the power to the remaining two engines by a significant margin.

Navy Says Growler Crew Died in Jet Crash Near Mount Rainier

Navy officials say a Growler crew died in a jet crash near Mount Rainier earlier this week in Washington state.

Efforts have been underway for several days to find the crash site and 2 crew members from Electronic Attack Squadron VAQ-130, the ZAPPERS. Operations have now shifted from search and rescue, to recovery.

IMG 3419
A map shared by the Yakima County Sheriff’s Office shows where a Navy EA-18G Growler crashed east of Mount Rainier on October 15, 2024. (Photo courtesy: Yakima County Sheriff’s Office)

Crew of 2 went down during a routine training flight Oct 15

Multiple search and rescue assets were involved, including a Navy MN-60S helicopter, to find the crash and crew. Efforts focused on an area 30 miles west of Yakima, challenged by mountainous terrain, cloudy weather, and low visibility.

Aerial crews eventually found the crash site, resting on a mountainside east of Mount Rainier.

IMG 3424
Photos via navy

The Naval Aviators lost are Lt. Cmdr. Lyndsay P. Evans, 31, a Naval Flight Officer from California, and Lt. Serena N. Wileman, 31, a Naval Aviator from California.

“It is with a heavy heart that we share the loss of two beloved Zappers,” said Cmdr. Timothy Warburton, commanding officer of VAQ-130. “Our priority right now is taking care of the families of our fallen aviators, and ensuring the well-being of our Sailors and the Growler community. We are grateful for the ongoing teamwork to safely recover the deceased.”

img 4512
EA-18G Growlers based at nas whidbey island (mike killian photography)

Personnel on site continue to search the expansive area, recovering debris and planning for the long-term salvage and recovery effort.

The cause of the crash is under investigation.

IMG 3366
Navy Says Growler Crew Died in Jet Crash Near Mount Rainier 9

The ZAPPERS are the oldest Electronic Attack squadron in the US Navy

The Zappers had just returned stateside too, following a combat deployment as the only EA-18 Growler squadron with Carrier Air Wing 3.

They served on the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) in support of Operation Prosperity Guardian in the southern Red Sea, where they executed strikes against Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen.

IMG 3393
U.S. Navy Electronic Attack Squadron 130 plane captains wait on the flightline for pilots of an EA-18G Growler to complete pre-flight checks prior to a training sortie (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Ryan Lackey)

They are the oldest electronic attack squadron in the Navy. The Zappers are also the first Growler squadron in Navy history to score an air-to-air kill.

Based on the Super Hornet airframe, the two-seat, twin-turbofan Growlers integrate the latest electronic attack technology. They jam and blind the enemy before a single shot need be fired.

Blue Angels, Thunderbirds Will Both Fly in Pensacola Nov 1-2

The Blue Angels and USAF Thunderbirds will both fly in the upcoming NAS Pensacola Blue Angels Homecoming Air Show Nov 1-2. It’s a very rare public get-together for both teams, and the only opportunity this year to see it at a public event.

IMG 3354
Photo credit: blue angels / thunderbirds

Both teams have conducted joint training together each winter for the last 5 years, most recently in March 2024 when the Thunderbirds visited the Blues’ at NAS El Centro. Each team represents different military branches, but both share a similar mission.

Both teams are now on the tail-end of a very busy air show season, performing across the United States week after week. The Pensacola show will be the last for both teams in 2024.

IMG 3355
Both teams together in a super delta over fat albert (photo credit blue angels)

A rare appearance together at the home of the Blue Angels

“Having our military’s top flight demonstration teams perform at the ‘Cradle of Naval Aviation’ will undoubtedly be an experience you won’t want to miss!” said Capt. Terry Shashaty, NAS Pensacola’s commanding officer.

“The Blue Angels and Homecoming Air Show are ingrained in the identity of Pensacola. We are proud to host a family-friendly event showcasing the capabilities and precision of both the Navy and Air Force teams as well as our civilian performers!”

IMG 3356
The United States Air Force Air Demonstration Team “Thunderbirds” conduct a ‘Mega Delta’ with the Blue Angels over Navy Air Facility El Centro, February 26, 2024 (U.S. Air Force photos by Staff Sgt. Breanna Klemm)

“Our demonstrations showcase the incredible milestones a team can accomplish when they work together,” says Thunderbirds leader Lt. Col. Nathan Malafa.

“It’s an honor to perform alongside our Navy counterparts; we both started building the foundations of our 2024 teams together in El Centro and will end our seasons together in a display of excellence.”

IMG 3358
The United States Air Force Air Demonstration Team “Thunderbirds” conduct a ‘Mega Delta’ with the Blue Angels over Navy Air Facility El Centro, February 26, 2024 (U.S. Air Force photos by Staff Sgt. Breanna Klemm)

While rare, it’s not the first time both teams have got together at an air show

While it is rare to see both teams together at any air show, it has happened before. They both appeared at Point Mugu in 2023.

They also flew the “Super Delta” together during a National Memorial Day parade in 2021, in addition to the America Strong flyovers during Covid in 2020. Both teams also appeared together at the Kansas City air show in 2021.

Both teams will fly together on Oct 30 ONLY

IMG 3476
The United States Air Force “Thunderbirds,” and the U.S. Navy “Blue Angels” perform joint training over Naval Air Facility El Centro, California, March 1, 2022 (Usaf photo by Staff Sgt. Andrew D. Sarver)

While both teams will be at the air show Nov 1-2, they won’t be actually flying together. Each team will fly their demos separately (officially, for now).

Both teams have however scheduled a Super Delta flyover of the Pensacola area on Oct 30 at 11:30am. Points along the planned flight path include Johnson Beach, Pensacola Beach, Oriole Beach and Palafox St.

Growler Crashes in Washington, Search Underway for Crew

Yesterday afternoon an EA-18G Growler from Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) 130 crashed in Washington state.

The crew of 2 went down east of Mount Rainier during a routine training flight. As of 1pm ET today, they have not been located, and neither has the wreckage.

ew3i0110
VAQ-130 flying a photo shoot with mike killian photography over oregon

Multiple assets involved to find the crash and crew

According to a Navy spokesperson from the crew’s base at NAS Whidbey Island, multiple search and rescue assets are involved including a Navy MN-60S helicopter, to find the crash and crew.

“We ask that everyone keep the members of the Growler and NASWI community and their families foremost in their thoughts and to be respectful of their privacy during this difficult time,” said the base in a social media update this morning.

ew3i0140 2
VAQ-130 Zappers (Mike Killian photo)

Crews are searching in the area 30 miles west of Yakima. Responders are facing mountainous terrain, cloudy weather, and low visibility.

The cause of the crash is under investigation. More information will be released as it becomes available. We will update here.

UPDATE OCT 17 – wreckage found

IMG 3393
VAQ-130 plane captains wait on the flightline for pilots of an EA-18G Growler to complete pre-flight checks prior to a training sortie (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Ryan Lackey)

The following update was provided by the Navy on Oct 16:

“Just after 12:30 p.m. PDT, aerial search crews located the wreckage of the EA-18G Growler that crashed on Oct. 15. The site rests on a mountainside east of Mount Rainier. The status of the two crew members is unknown while the search effort continues.

An Emergency Operations Center has been established on NAS Whidbey Island to coordinate response efforts. The Navy is making preparations to deploy personnel to the remote area that is not accessible by motorized vehicles.

img 4212
Mike killian photo

“I am thankful for the tremendous teamwork displayed by the NAS Whidbey Island squadrons — VAQ, VP, VQ, TOCRON 10 and SAR — as Team Whidbey continues to respond to our tragic mishap,” said Capt. David Ganci, commander, Electronic Attack Wing, U.S. Pacific Fleet. “I am also grateful to local law enforcement, responders, and tribal communities whose partnership has been essential in planning our critical next steps for access to the site.”

VAQ-130 is the oldest Electronic Attack squadron is the US Navy

The Zappers had just returned stateside too, following a combat deployment as the only EA-18 Growler squadron with Carrier Air Wing 3. They served on the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) in support of Operation Prosperity Guardian in the southern Red Sea, where they executed strikes against Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen.

IMG 3394
U.S. Navy Lt. Parker Bailey signals the launch of an E/A-18G Growler, attached to the “Zappers” of VAQ-130, aboard the aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) in the Gulf of Oman Nov. 20, 2023 (Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 3rd Class Janae Chambers)

They are the oldest electronic attack squadron in the Navy, and the first Growler squadron in Navy history to score an air-to-air kill.

Based on the Super Hornet airframe, the two-seater, twin-turbofan Growlers integrate the latest electronic attack technology. They jam and blind the enemy before a single shot need be fired.

The Story of the de Havilland Canada DHC-7

0

The de Havilland Canada DHC-7, which was later named “Dash 7,” was the seventh and then-largest capacity aircraft to emerge from the Toronto and Downsivew, Ontario, manufacturer.  It also served as the threshold to the turboprop regional airliner market, but incorporated the same STOL features that were often needed because of Canada’s topographical challenges.

“Specializing in short takeoff transport has led de Havilland Canada into a whole new world—building small, economical airliners for the feeder and commuter services, whilst tenaciously keeping the lead in short-field bush operation,” according to C. Martin Sharp in DH: A History of de Havilland (Airlife Publishing, Ltd., 1982, p.374).

DHC-7 Design Origins

Seaborne Airlines de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter seaplane
A Seaborne Airlines de Havilland Canada DHC-6 Twin Otter seaplane | IMAGE: Seaborne Airlines (Silver Airways) on Facebook

1968 market studies indicated the need for a lager regional airliner to replace the DHC-6 Twin Otter or complement it on higher-demand routes. As a more ambitious design, it was to be powered by double the number of turboprop engines than its predecessor, accommodate double the number of passengers, and feature a 26,500-pound gross weight, but retain short takeoff capability.

Because it anticipated STOLport construction near city centers to avoid longer, surface journey times to existing, outlying airports, de Havilland Canada felt uniquely qualified to produce such a design that would require no more than a 2,000-foot runway.

1280px De Havilland Canada DHC 7 C GNCA X 07
A DHC-7 on the ramp. Image: Piergiuliano Chesi, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

As the seventh in the de Havilland Canada family of trainers, utility types, and transports, BAE Systems described it as “a four-engine STOL regional airliner drawing on de Haviland Canada experience with the Beaver, Otter, and Twin Otter,” according to its website. 

“Designed and built by the de Havilland Aircraft Company of Canada at Downsview, Toronto, the DHC-7 was part of a family of aircraft specifically developed for use in the rough Canadian wilderness and capable of facing its wide-ranging weather conditions.”

DHC-7 Design Features

Considerably deviating from its rugged, DHC-6 Twin Otter predecessor, the larger DHC-7 featured four 1,120-shp Pratt and Whitney PT6A-50 turboprops encased in wing leading edge-mounted nacelles that drove four-bladed, fully-feathering, 11.3-foot-diameter, slow-turning (at 1,210 rpm) Hamilton Standard propellers. 

Pressurized, it accommodated up to 54 four-abreast passengers in a wide-look cabin with enclosed overhead storage compartments and an aft galley, lavatory, and garment closet.

DHC-7 Takes Off

Registered C-GNBX, the first prototype first flew on March 27, 1975 and was granted its type certificate two years later, on May 2. Its short takeoff and landing performance, consisting of a seven-degree glideslope and a 35-foot landing reference height, was approved under Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Parts 25 and 121. 

The result was a quieter, more modern, airline-standard turboprop regional aircraft in the Convair 580, Fokker F.27 Friendship, and Hawker Siddeley HS.748 class, but with STOL capabilities.

DHC-7 Operators

Launch customer Rocky Mountain Airways took delivery of its first DHC-7-100—the fourth produced—on February 3, 1978.  Optimized for its tourist route structure that consisted of high-elevation, short-field ski resort-serving airports, it operated to Avon Airport, which is located in a mountain valley and provides access to Vail.  As a STOLport, it was controlled by Rocky Mountain itself and was the popular destination of Denver-originating passengers.

Some of its other challenging routes included those to Steamboat Springs, whose 4,452-foot runway was at a 6,882-foot elevation, and Telluride, in the San Juan Mountains, whose 9,078-foot elevation was one of the highest in the US.  It served the latter destination as a Continental Express carrier.

Air Wisconsin DHC-7. Image: Richard Silagi, CC BY-SA 4.0 via Wikimedia Commons
Air Wisconsin DHC-7. Image: Richard Silagi, CC BY-SA 4.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Other DHC-7 US operators included Air Oregon, Air Pacific, Air West, Air Wisconsin, Atlantic Southeast (ASA), Crown Airways, Era Aviation, Golden West, Gulfstream International, Henson, MarkAir Express, Paradise Island Airlines, and Rio Airways. 

DHC 7 N174RA Pan Am Ex KBOS 02.08.87R edited 3
Pan Am Express operated the DHC-7. Image: RuthAS, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

These and other carriers often provided two-letter code-share agreement services with major-affiliated carriers, wearing the liveries of Allegheny Commuter, Continental Express, the Delta Connection, Pan Am Express, and Trans World Express.

Hawaiian Airlines specifically constructed a 3,000-foot runway in Kapalua, Maui, for its DHC-7 operations, beginning service with the type on May 1, 1987.

Ransome Airlines, which operated independently and as both an Allegheny Commuter partner and Pan Am Express, uniquely operated from “stub” runways, particularly at Washington-National Airport, touching down on one of the nonactive or cross-strips and then holding short until ground clearance was given to taxi. 

DHC-7’s Performance Enabled Additional Access

The result of an FAA-approved plan, its operation was preceded by demonstration of the Dash-7’s ability to execute a VFR approach during the loss of an engine and then bank away.  Because the operation did not require the acquisition of a sometimes-unavailable landing slot, it was able to serve destinations to which it would otherwise have not had access.

Wardair of Canada took delivery of the second DHC-7 on June 8, 1978.

“Soon after, it carried Queen Elizabeth II and the Duke of Edinburgh during a royal tour in Alberta,” according to Frederick K. Larkin in “DHC-7: The Quiet STOL Multi-Tasker” (SkiesMagazine, July 8, 2019).  “After that, it was hauling everything from containers of mineral concentrate and building materials to personnel and perishables. 

Nine months later, the same aircraft shuttled senators and 55 tons of goods between CFB Alert on Ellesmere Island and an ice camp near the geographic North Pole.”

The DHC-7 was one of the few types certified to operate from London City STOLport, in the city’s Dockland region.  Steep approaches and its short, single airstrip left Brymon Airways and London City Airways little choice but to acquire the type.

Program Conclusion

Despite the DHC-7’s flexibility, only 113 of all variants were built when production ceased in 1988, although the type certificate was ultimately transferred to Viking Air of British Columbia in 2005.

As the largest commuter-regional airliner then available, it was only attractive to carriers whose routes required 50-passenger capacities and its four engines increased operating costs over those of similar types. 

The envisioned city center-proximity STOLports never materialized, leaving airlines to operate from larger, existing airports where steep approaches and low touchdown speeds were not needed. 

And, perhaps creating its own competition, de Havilland Canada designed its twin-engine DHC-8 successor, which seated between 37 and 70 passengers in tis three main versions and operated longer sectors at 25-percent greater speeds on half the number of powerplants.

Lockheed’s ES-3A Shadow Knew What Evil Lurked Over The Horizon

2

This Replacement For The Venerable EA-3B “Electric Whale” Only Served For Eight Very Busy Years

In 1991, the last Navy EA-3B Skywarrior was retired after 40 years of service. The last Douglas EA-3B Electric Whale, 146448, assigned to Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron TWO (VQ-2) Batmen, went to the boneyard later that year.

The Lockheed ES-3A Shadow was intended to replace the venerable EA-3B and perform its electronic reconnaissance and countermeasures/signals intelligence (SIGINT) work aboard US Navy aircraft carriers. Over two years, between 1991 and 1993, Lockheed modified 16 existing S-3A Viking airframes to ES-3A Shadow standard.

Only the six US-3A Viking CODs joined the ES-3As as production variants of the base S-3.

Lockheed ES-3A Shadow
Official US Navy Photograph

Shadowy Black Boxes Aboard

Though literally packed to the gills with electronic black boxes and festooned with lumps, bumps, and blades (more than 60 of them) the Shadow’s ability to do its job was provided in large part by the Aries II suite of electronics used in Lockheed’s land-based EP-3E Orion. Though the standard Viking antisubmarine warfare (ASW) electronics suite was removed, including the magnetic anomaly detector (MAD) boom in the tail, the Shadow retained the Viking’s ability to pass gas and was used in the airborne tanker or “Texaco” role at times.

Lockheed ES-3A Shadow in flight
Official US Navy Photograph

Still Gotta Texaco

Crewed by a pilot, a naval flight officer (NFO) in the co-pilot seat, and two systems operators, the advanced Aries II sensor, navigation, and communications systems allow the Shadow’s four-person crew to collect and distribute high-quality data and information through a variety of channels to the carrier battle group. This gave the battle group commander a clear picture of potential airborne, surface, and sub-surface threats.

Missions flown by the VQ detachment included over-the-horizon detection, classification, and targeting using passive sensors, strike support, war at sea, reconnaissance, and, of course, airborne refueling via “buddy” store.

Two Lockheed ES-3A Shadows in flight
Official US Navy Photograph

They Sure Did Get Around

Only two squadrons operated the 16 Shadows: Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron FIVE (VQ-5) Sea Shadows and VQ-6 Black Ravens. VQ-5 was based initially at Naval Air Station (NAS) Agana on Guam but moved to Naval Air Station (NAS) North Island at San Diego during the mid-1990s. VQ-6 was based at NAS Jacksonville in Florida on the East Coast. Both squadrons were assigned eight airframes, which were usually split into four two-aircraft detachments for their deployments aboard aircraft carriers.

Lockheed ES-3A Shadow in flight above a carrier
Official US Navy Photograph

Sudden and Ignominious End

VQ-5 participated in operations off Korea in 1994 and off Taiwan during the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis in March of 1996. Operation Southern Watch and Operation Desert Fox provided the Sea Shadows with plenty of work, but Desert Fox was the last hurrah for the Sea Shadows. They were disestablished shortly after returning from their final deployment aboard USS Carl Vinson (CVN-70). VQ-6 deployed 13 times aboard seven different aircraft carriers and worked Bosnia, Southern Watch, and Desert Fox. The Black Ravens, too, were disestablished after their last deployment aboard the carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65).

Three Lockheed ES-3A Shadows in flight
Official US Navy Photograph

What Were They Thinking?

The ES-3A Shadows were decommissioned by the end of September 1999 after only eight years in service, primarily because the cost of upgrading the Shadow’s mission equipment to retain the ability to communicate with other (read newer) SIGINT assets. Rather than update the Shadow, it was replaced instead by the Lockheed EP-3E Aries II.

By the end of 1999, both VQ-5 and VQ-6 had been disestablished, and their aircraft sent to the AMARG boneyard. At first, the aircraft were stored in ready reserve status, but by 2003, their parts were needed to keep their by-then short-lived S-3B Viking cousins in the air. Despite their disproportionately high sortie rate, no ES-3As were lost to mishaps during their short but intense careers.

Lockheed ES-3A Shadow
Official US Navy Photograph

Nuuk, Nuuk! Who’s There? United’s Big Summer 2025 Expansion 

0

Today, United Airlines revealed its most extensive international expansion in its 98-year history, adding eight new destinations to its Summer 2025 schedule. 

With these new routes, United is setting itself up for its most ambitious summer schedule ever, flying to more international destinations than any other U.S. airline. 

Next summer, United will launch service to Ulaanbaatar (Mongolia), Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Nuuk (Greenland), Palermo (Italy), Bilbao (Spain), Madeira Island (Portugal), Faro (Portugal), and Dakar (Senegal). This list of new destinations is a massive expansion for the Chicago-based carrier, pushing into new regions while bolstering its position in existing European, Asian, and African markets. 

United Airlines Will Become the First U.S. Carrier to Fly to Greenland 

United Airlines will launch service to Nuuk, Greenland in 2025
Runway and terminal expansion underway at Nuuk International Airport (GOH) | IMAGE: Greenland Airports on Facebook

Amid a growing tourism industry in the Danish territory of Greenland, United will operate to Greenland for the first time in its history. In fact, it will become the first time a U.S. airline has ever had scheduled service to the world’s largest island. 

Service to Nuuk will begin on 14 June. Nuuk is the capital of Greenland and plans to open its new international airport next month. Typically, flights to Greenland operate to Kangerlussuaq Airport (SFJ), where travelers can connect via Iceland or Denmark. Air Greenland, headquartered in Nuuk, operates its long-haul international flights to Denmark from Kangerlussuaq. The opening of Nuuk International Airport (GOH) will make this remote Arctic destination–just over four hours from New York– more accessible than ever. As the only nonstop U.S. service to Greenland, travelers will enjoy a rare opportunity to explore one of the world’s most pristine natural environments. 

United will operate the seasonal, twice-weekly flight from Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) with a Boeing 737 MAX 8.  

Mainland Europe Will See Boosted United Service

United Airlines Boeing 767-300
A United Airlines Boeing 767-300 | IMAGE: United Airlines

In addition to Nuuk, United’s Summer 2025 expansion plans include several other exciting European destinations.

Italy: The carrier will launch its first-ever service to the Italian island of Sicily. New flights to Palermo’s Falcone Borsellino Airport (PMO) will begin on 21 May aboard a Boeing 767-400 from EWR. This seasonal, thrice-weekly service puts Palermo in United’s growing portfolio of Italian destinations, including Rome, Milan, Naples, and Venice. 

Spain: Travelers heading to northern Spain’s Basque Country can now book direct flights to Bilbao starting on 31 May. United will operate this seasonal route three times a week from EWR, complementing its existing service to other Spanish cities like Palma de Mallorca, Tenerife, and Barcelona. United will operate a Boeing 757-200 on the route. 

Portugal: United is also expanding its service to Portugal, adding two new destinations: Madeira Island and Faro. Flights to Madeira’s Cristiano Ronaldo International Airport (FNC) will begin on 7 June aboard a Boeing 737 MAX 8, while service to Faro International Airport (FAO) in the Algarve region will launch on 16 May aboard a Boeing 757-200. Both routes will operate out of EWR, giving travelers more access to Portugal’s stunning coastlines, cultural sites, and, of course, its famous wine regions. With these additions, United will fly to five Portuguese cities, including Lisbon, Porto, and Ponta Delgada. 

Some Summer Flights to Europe Will Begin Earlier than Ever

United Airlines jets at San Francisco
United Airlines jets at San Francisco International Airport (SFO) on 09 May 2024 | IMAGE: Photo by David Syphers on Unsplash

United’s summer 2025 schedule includes these new destinations and ramps up service to several other European cities. The carrier will add more flights between EWR and Palma de Mallorca, Spain (PMI); Dubrovnik, Croatia (DBV); and Athens, Greece (ATH), while also launching earlier seasonal service to Venice, Italy (VCE) and Barcelona, Spain (BCN). 

As United gears up for next summer, it will begin operating more transatlantic flights earlier in the season. Travelers can expect flights to ATH (06 March), VCE (29 March), and BCN (01 May) to kick off before the traditional summer season begins. Additionally, the carrier will launch the following nonstop flights to and from Europe: 

  • San Francisco International Airport (SFO) to BCN | 01 May | Boeing 777-200
  • Chicago O’Hare (ORD) to ATH | 01 May | Daily | Boeing 787-10 
  • Washington Dulles (IAD) to VCE | 22 May | Daily through 25 September, then 4x weekly | Boeing 767-300
  • IAD to Nice Côte d’Azur Airport (NCE) in France | 24 May | Seasonal, 4x weekly | Boeing 767-300

United’s Intra-Asian Network will Connect Japan and Mongolia 

United Airlines Boeing 777-200 at Tokyo Narita
A United Airlines Boeing 777-200 lands at Tokyo Narita (NRT) on 12 February 2018 | IMAGE: Masahiro TAKAGI from Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

United’s European expansion is complemented by a fairly robust Asian expansion, including a growing intra-Asian network of flights from Tokyo Narita (NRT). 

Mongolia: Service to Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, will begin on 1 May from NRT. Ulaanbaatar is Mongolia’s capital city and home to the country’s only international airport. The carrier will operate a Boeing 737-800 for the seasonal, thrice-weekly service to Chinggis Khaan International Airport (UBN). It will be United’s first foray into Mongolia and the only U.S. airline to offer service to UBN. 

Taiwan: Flights to Kaohsiung, Taiwan’s second-largest city, will begin on 11 July. United will operate daily flights between Kaohsiung International Airport (KHH) and NRT aboard a Boeing 737-800. This new route complements United’s existing SFO and Tapei (TPE) service. 

United also plans to launch a year-round nonstop flight between NRT and Koror, Palau. It was the only U.S. airline to serve Palau, a remote Pacific nation comprising over 350 islands. Service to Roman Tmetuchi International Airport (ROR) from NRT will begin on 02 April. The daily service will utilize a Boeing 737-800. 

Africa and Central America are Part of United’s Expansion, Too 

United Airlines jets at EWR
United Airlines jets parked at Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) on 07 Aug 2021 | IMAGE: Photo by Chris Leipelt on Unsplash

Senegal: Rounding out United’s eight new destinations is Dakar, the capital of Senegal. The carrier plans to begin year-round, thrice-weekly service to Blaise Diagne International Airport (DSS) from IAD beginning on 23 May. This service, operated with a Boeing 767-300, will complement United’s existing African service to Cape Town (CPT) and Johannesburg (JNB), South Africa; Accra, Ghana (ACC); and Lagos, Nigeria (LOS). United also flies seasonally to Marrakesh, Morocco (RAK).

United’s Central American network will also see additional flights in 2024, including service to Mexico’s Puerto Escondido International Airport (PXM). The carrier will utilize an Embraer E175 Mesa-operated regional jet to the city from Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH). The service will be year-round but limited to one flight per week.

San Jose, Costa Rica, will finally connect to the last of United’s seven hub cities when the carrier begins service to Juan Santamaria International Airport (SJO) from SFO on 22 May. This route will utilize a Boeing 737-8 MAX.

United will also begin previously announced flights from EWR to Dominica’s Douglas-Charles Airport (DOM) on 15 February. 

A Summer of Adventure Awaits 

A United Airlines jet departs from Newark (EWR)
A United AIrlines jet departs from Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) on 29 Jul 2020 | IMAGE: Photo by Bing Hui Yau on Unsplash

United’s Summer 2025 schedule is one of the most unique expansions in the carrier’s history. It introduces these eight new destinations and significantly bolsters its strong transatlantic and global network. 

This list of well-established and emerging destinations opens up opportunities for leisure and business travelers to explore regions often underserved by U.S. carriers–or not served at all. 

By the numbers, United will offer more than 760 transatlantic flights to over 40 cities next summer, topping all other U.S. carriers. Altogether, United will operate 800 daily international flights to 147 destinations worldwide, with 40 nonstop routes that no other major U.S. airline flies. 

What route are you most excited about? I’d love to be aboard the first flight to Nuuk, as it has been a lifelong dream of mine to visit Greenland. 

Invader: The Medium Bomber With the Identity Problem

0

The Douglas A-26/B-26 Invader Fought in Three Big Wars and Many Smaller Ones

The Douglas A-26 Invader was created as a replacement for the company’s previous twin-engine attack aircraft, the very successful DB-7 Boston/A-20 Havoc. The A-26 Invader didn’t become the B-26 Invader until 1948. By that time the new US Air Force was no longer flying the previous B-26, Martin’s B-26 Marauder medium bomber, having retired the last of them the previous year, so the redesignation of the A-26 to the B-26 made sense. But the two aircraft were vastly different in design if not mission.

B26A26
Martin B-26 Marauder (top) and Douglas A-26 Invader (bottom). Ironically by the time the A-26 wore these colors it had taken over the B-26 designation. Images via national museum of the us air force (NMUSAF)

Designed by Legends

The A-26 was designed beginning in 1940 by none other than the renowned Ed Heinemann, along with Robert Donovan, Ted R. Smith and A.M.O. Smith. A full-scale mock-up of the A-26 was inspected by the US Army Air Corps in April of 1941. A contract for development was awarded the following June. Design highlights included a high shoulder-mounted laminar flow wing section with squared off wingtips, pronounced dihedral, and a pair of 2,000 horsepower Pratt & Whitney R-2800-27 Double Wasp radial piston engines mounted in tight-fitting nacelles turning three-bladed Hamilton Standard Hydromatic constant-speed propellers, a boxy fuselage with a conventional squared-off empennage, and tricycle landing gear. The A-26 was about three feet longer with a nine foot longer wingspan and 80 square feet more wing area than the A-20. The A-26 also outweighed the A-20 by about three tons when empty.

j050 DL 037 41 39136 MeskoJim A 26 InvaderInActionNo134 p007 cuta
A-26b image via Nmusaf

Interchangeable Parts

A-26s were manufactured in two different basic configurations. The A-26B was normally equipped with what was called the All-Purpose Nose, which mounted six or later eight forward-firing .50 caliber machine guns, although it was possible to mount 20 millimeter cannons or even a 75 millimeter howitzer in lieu of some or all of the .50s. The A-26C had the Bombardier Nose, which included a Norden bombsight, two fixed forward-firing .50 caliber machine guns, and clear unframed Perspex in the nose. But either nose configuration could be swapped for the other by the ground crews in just a few hours. This gave the A-26 tremendous operational flexibility.

553d Bombardment Squadron A 26 Invadera
a-26C image via nmusaf

Heavily Armed

The A-26 was crewed by three- pilot, navigator/bombardier, and a gunner who operated the remotely controlled ventral and dorsal gun turrets, each of which had a pair of .50 caliber machine guns. The navigator/bombardier’s duties were determined by which nose his A-26 was wearing on a given mission. In the C the B/N rode in the nose, but in the B he sat with the pilot. Later production A-26s were equipped with three .50 caliber machine guns in each wing when the All Purpose Nose armament went from six to eight .50s, giving the A-26B 14 forward firing .50s- 18 if both turrets were aimed forward. A-26s with wing-mounted .50s also received rails for carriage of seven rail-mounted High Velocity Aerial Rockets (HVARs) under each wing.

f29a6e39822cd1ae6a3faabb527056b4
a-26b image via nmusaf

Initial Findings

The prototype XA-26 Invader flew for the first time on 10 July 1942. Aside from some engine cooling issues which led to cowling modifications and the elimination of the spinners from the propellers and issues with the nose gear that resulted in the redesign of same, the A-26 fairly sailed through testing. Pilots reported it was a sweet-flying aircraft with excellent performance and predictable handling. Later the original A-26 flat canopy was replaced with a dual-clamshell design which provided better visibility beginning in late 1944.

xT10968 5 26 44
A-26B in the southwest pacific. image via nmusaf

To War in the Pacific…Sort of

The A-26B went to war beginning in August of 1943 with General George C Kenney’s Fifth Air Force in the Southwest Pacific. A-26Bs first went into combat on 23 June 1944. Pilots of the new aircraft found that although they were fast, outward vision from the cockpit was limited by the engine nacelles, making the A-26B inadequate for the low-level attack work for which the Fifth Air Force became famous. In fact Kenney was quoted as saying, “We do not want the A-26 under any circumstances as a replacement for anything.” Ouch! So Fifth Air Force A-20G Havocs flew alongside the few A-26B Invaders in the area for the rest of the war- but the A-26B never replaced the A-20 Havoc or the North American B-25 Mitchell medium bomber in Fifth Air Force service. Some A-26Bs did see duty with the Seventh Air Force on Okinawa but arrived too late to see significant combat.

j050 DT 107 43 22356 416thBG Archive Cachat 137 416 20 MARCH 45 A 26 BEFORE TAKE OFFa
A-26Bs in the eto. image via nmusaf

To War in Europe. For Real This Time

In the European Theatre of Operations (ETO) the Ninth Air Force began receiving A-26Bs in late August of 1944. The 553rd Bomb Squadron (BS) of the 386th Bomb Group (BG) took the A-26B to war beginning on 6 September 1944. No A-26Bs were lost during eight missions, resulting in the Ninth Air Force buying in- so much so that they said their war-weary A-20 Havocs and B-26 Marauders were ready for replacement by the Invader. Invaders were used by several more Ninth Air Force squadrons for bombing, strafing, night interdiction, and even tactical reconnaissance. The Twelfth Air Force also began using A-26Bs in the Italian campaign beginning in January of 1945 and also reported exemplary results with their new Douglas attackers.

3fd886f560d4029a5eea985453940e5fa
A-26Bs dropping on italy. image via nmusaf

For More of the Invader Story Bang NEXT PAGE Below

Nashville’s Growth Continues as Aer Lingus Lands in Music City

Nashville International Airport (BNA) is celebrating a new transatlantic flight announcement for the second time in a week. 

Just last week, BNA officials announced that Icelandair would commence European service from Music City in 2025. Aer Lingus is following in Icelandair’s footsteps, announcing it will begin nonstop flights to Dublin Airport (DUB) in Ireland next April. 

Aer Lingus and Icelandair Join British Airways at BNA 

Aer Lingus A321neo
Dublin-Based Aer Lingus will use 184-seat A321neos for its Dublin to Nashville route | IMAGE: Aer Lingus

Dublin-based Aer Lingus and Icelandair will complement BNA’s existing (and only) transatlantic service offered by British Airways. 

BNA-DUB flights will begin on 12 April 2025. The carrier will fly the route four times weekly: Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays. Flights will be operated by a narrowbody Airbus A321neo, which features 168 seats in economy and 16 lie-flat seats in Business Class. 

A quick search on the Aer Lingus website shows Flight 76 departing from BNA at 1840 and arriving in DUB the next morning at 0850. For the return trip, Flight 77 departs DUB at 1405 and arrives back at BNA at 1710. 

Aer Lingus will join Icelandair as BNA’s newest European airline. On 26 September, BNA officials announced Icelandair will begin service to Keflavík International Airport (KEF) in Iceland’s capital city of Reykjavik on 16 May 2025. Icelandair will operate the flight four times weekly (Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday) with a Boeing 737-800 MAX. The seven-hour flight will feature 144 economy seats and 16 seats in Icelandair’s business class product, Saga Premium. 

Currently, only British Airways offers transatlantic flights from BNA, with daily service to London Heathrow Airport (LHR). The carrier recently upgauged from a Boeing 787-8 to the larger capacity Boeing 777-200, which features 272 seats and its Club Suite premium product. 

British Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner
A British Airways Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner at the gate at BNA | IMAGE: Nashville International Airport on Facebook

British Airways first began flying out of BNA in 2018. However, the carrier suspended operations twice between 2020 and 2022 before what appears to be a permanent stay in Music City. Prior to British Airways’ arrival in 2018, BNA had been without transatlantic flights for 22 years. 

Southwest Adds International and Domestic Routes from BNA 

Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-8 MAX
A Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-8 MAX (N8735L) taxis at BNA | IMAGE: Nashville International Airport on Facebook

Not to be outdone, Southwest is also adding international capacity at BNA. The carrier announced in late August that it will begin nonstop service between BNA and Los Cabos International Airport (SJD) in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, and Punta Cana International Airport (PUJ) in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Service to both cities will begin on 8 March 2025. 

Southwest’s international expansion at BNA comes amid domestic expansion for the carrier. On 25 September, Southwest unveiled six new destinations from BNA, including: 

  • Albuquerque, N.M. | Albuquerque International Sunport (ABQ) 
  • Albany, N.Y. | Albany International Airport (ALB) 
  • Jackson, Miss. | Jackson-Medgar Wiley Evers International Airport (JAN) 
  • Memphis, Tenn. | Memphis International Airport (MEM) 
  • Providence, R.I. | Rhode Island T.F. Green International Airport (PVD)
  • Tulsa, Okla. | Tulsa International Airport (TUL)

In addition, Southwest recently announced new service to Indianapolis International Airport (IND) from BNA starting on 6 March 2025. 

Southwest’s robust Music City expansion comes on the heels of the opening of its 12th crew base at BNA in May 2024. 

Canada and Mexico Are In, Germany Is Out 

Air Canada Airbus A220-300 at BNA
An Air Canada Airbus A220-300 and an American Airlines Airbus A319 rest at the new international terminal at BNA | IMAGE: Nashville International Airport on Facebook

Other international service at BNA includes routes to six Canadian destinations operated by WestJet, Flair, or Air Canada. BNA also boasts nonstop flights to Cancun, Mexico (CUN) with Southwest, American (seasonal), and VivaAerobus (seasonal). 

BNA appeared to be on the cusp of announcing service to Frankfurt, Germany, with German carrier Discover Airlines. However, plans for this service came to an abrupt halt last month. 

Nashville is Part of Aer Lingus’ North American Expansion Plan

Aer Lingus Airbus A330-200
Aer Lingus Airbus A330-200 “St. Columba” | IMAGE: Aer Lingus on Facebook

Aer Lingus’ plan to serve Nashville follows its continued North American expansion into mid-sized cities such as Cleveland (CLE), Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP), Denver (DEN), and Hartford (BDL). 

Including Nashville, Aer Lingus will serve 17 US destinations and one Canadian destination from either Dublin, Shannon (SNN), or Manchester, England (MAN). The list of North American destinations include: 

  • Boston (BOS) *from DUB and SNN 
  • Chicago (ORD) 
  • Cleveland (CLE) 
  • Denver (DEN) 
  • Hartford (BDL) 
  • Las Vegas (LAS)
  • Los Angeles (LAX) 
  • Miami (MIA) 
  • Minneapolis (MSP) 
  • Newark (EWR)
  • New York (JFK) *from DUB, SNN, and MAN 
  • Orlando (MCO) *from DUB and MAN 
  • Philadelphia (PHL) 
  • San Francisco (SFO) 
  • Seattle (SEA) 
  • Toronto (YYZ) 
  • Washington Dulles (IAD) 

Globally, Aer Lingus serves 97 destinations with a fleet of Airbus A320s, A321s, and A330s. 

US-3A Viking COD: It Was Actually a Compromise

Reserved For When You Absolutely Positively Had to Get to WestPac ASAP

Fleet Tactical Support Squadron FIVE ZERO (VRC-50) Foo Dogs flew a variety of aircraft between their establishment in 1966 and their disestablishment in 1994. They were redesignated as a Fleet Logistics Support Squadron in 1976. The squadron flew Grumman C-1A Traders and C-2A Greyhounds, North American CT-39 Sabreliners, and Lockheed C-130F Hercules airlifters. But one of the most interesting, and little known, aircraft flown by the Foo Dogs was the Lockheed US-3A Viking Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) variant.

US 3A Viking of VRC 50 at NAS Cubi Point 1992
VRC-50 US-3A unfolds at Cubi Point. Image via US Navy

There Can Be Only Six

One reason the US-3A is not exactly a household name is that Lockheed built only six of them. They built a total of 188 S-3 airframes. Most of them were S-3A/S-3B Viking antisubmarine warfare (ASW) jets. Sixteen of those were converted into ES-3A Shadow electronic intelligence (ELINT) variants. But only six US-3A COD variants were built. Five out of the six were converted from early pre-production flight test aircraft. One reason Lockheed was able to do this was the uncommonly smooth development cycle of the Viking. Another reason is that the US-3A was the follow-up to an entirely different Lockheed COD proposal. Well, not entirely…

VRC-50 US-3A aboard the Midway.
VRC-50 US-3A aboard the Midway. Image via US Navy

Successful COD Formulas

Lockheed recognized the success Grumman experienced with their C-1A Trader COD aircraft, developed from their S-2 Tracker ASW platform and sharing many of its components but with a modified higher-volume fuselage. The C-2A Greyhound was developed from the E-2 Hawkeye. So Lockheed proposed an offshoot of the Viking sharing some components but with a larger higher capacity fuselage, rear cargo ramp, and uprated engines. The Navy decided to continue with the C-2A as the primary COD solution, but saw the value in a small number of minimally modified Viking CODs. The result: the US-3A- sometimes referred to as Miss Piggy.

VRC-50 US-3As at Diego Garcia
VRC-50 US-3As at Diego Garcia. Image via US navy

Built for WestPac and Beyond

All of the US-3A CODs served with VRC-50 out of Naval Air Station (NAS) Atsugi in Japan, NAS Cubi Point in the Philippines, Andersen Air Force Base (AFB) on Guam, and their homeport of NAS San Diego when not deployed, which really wasn’t very often. They also frequented places like Diego Garcia in the middle of the Indian Ocean (or near enough, you can see it from there). These aircraft supported aircraft carriers serving in the Western Pacific (WestPac) and points further west- as far as the Gulf during Desert Shield and Desert Storm. They were of course faster than their slightly larger contemporary, the Grumman C-2A Greyhound, but could not haul outsize cargo such as jet engines like the Greyhound (still – at least for now) can.

US 3A Vikings of VRC 50 on USS Kitty Hawk CV 63 1987
VRC-50 US-3As on the Hawk. Image via US Navy

Stripped-Down Heavy Hauler

US-3As were stripped of their ASW mission crew of a tactical coordinator (TACCO) and a sensor operator (SENSO) along with their crew stations and all mission-related equipment carried in the aft fuselage. This left enough room inside the stripped out Viking for six passengers seated on removable/reconfigurable seats and/or up to 4,680 pounds of cargo. Already longer-legged than the Greyhounds, US-3As also retained their ability to refuel in midair – extending their range even more. Unique to the US-3As were the 1/3-width window added to both sides of the forward fuselage. For VIPs who absolutely positively had to get there ASAP and for equally important but size-limited cargo, these white-painted Viking CODs were the way to go.

Viking going through pre-flight checks.
VRC-50 US-3A. Note the extra window. Image via US Navy/National Archives

The Blivets That Outlived Their Owners

Even the weapons bays of the US-3As were modified to carry cargo. US-3As also carried specially built cargo pods hung from their underwing pylons. These “blivets” were swapped with drop tanks when range was of paramount importance. After the US-3As were retired, the blivets were sometimes seen hung on fleet S-3A and S-3B Vikings. The US-3A Bureau Numbers (BuNos) were 157994, 157995, 157996, 157997, 157998, and 158868. The pre-production aircraft all served at one time or another with Viking Fleet Replacement Squadron (RAG) VS-41 Shamrocks before conversion to US-3A and many went back to VS-41 after they were retired by VRC-50 during the mid-1990s.

S 3A VS 24 at NAS Fallon 1986
VS-24 Scouts S-3A Viking with a blivet underwing. Image via US Navy

Could Have Been a Whole New Texaco

157998 served briefly with VS-21 Fighting Redtails, VS-31 Topcats, VS-37 Sawbucks, VS-28 Gamblers, and VS-33 Screwbirds configured as a US-3A between 1979 and 1981 before going to VRC-50. 157996 was also the sole KS-3A Viking tanker demonstrator. The jet was configured with a retractable centerline drogue, conformal tanks in the weapons bay, extra-large drop tanks, and plumbing mods. During the late 1970s, the lone KS-3A refueled every Navy jet type equipped with a probe before duty with VRC-50. Unfortunately, 157996 was also the only US-3A loss. On 20 January 1989, 157996 went down at sea while on approach to Subic Bay, taking the lives of the crew of two flying the jet that day.

Viking on the flight deck with wings folded.
VRC-50 US-3A aboard the Lincoln. Image via US Navy

Languishing in the Desert But Not Ignored

At the time this piece was written there were 92 Viking airframes stored at the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group (AMARG) at Davis-Monthan AFB in Arizona. The recent announcement that the Navy has (finally) awarded a contract to build aerial refueling drones to extend the range of its short-legged tactical jets makes many wonder why those Vikings, many of which still have plenty of operating life left, haven’t been utilized. I know – it’s an old argument, but any discussion about Vikings is a good discussion. Because War Hoover. And Texaco. And Miss Piggy!

Viking landing on a carrier.
VRC-50 US-3A about to trap on the Lincoln. Image via US Navy

The Furies: North American’s Only Navy Fighters

FJ Furies Came in Several Flavors But All Were Mostly Sabres at Heart

North American Aviation (NAA) is justifiably famous for producing the B-25 Mitchell medium bomber and the P-51 Mustang fighter for the US Army Air Corps and later the US Air Force. However, when it came to producing carrier-based aircraft for the US Navy and Marine Corps, NAA’s significance faded in comparison to that of Douglas, Grumman, and Vought. In fact, NAA only produced one fighter for the Navy- the FJ series of jet-powered fighters.

FJ-1 Furies
FJ-1 Furies image via NNAM

Created from the Same DNA

NAA leveraged several assemblies from the P-51 Mustang to produce their first jet-powered fighter, the FJ-1 Fury. The straight-winged FJ-1 incorporated tail surfaces, wings, and a canopy/cockpit derived from the Mustang. But NAA didn’t limit this approach to their first Naval fighter design. The original design for the eventually legendary F-86 Sabre was essentially the same aircraft as the FJ-1. It wasn’t until swept wings replaced the straight wings on the Sabre and the Fury that either design became the jets we associate with those names today.

Naval Reserve FJ 1 at Los Alamitos 1950
FJ-1 Fury image via NNAM

Going Straight

During late 1944, the US Navy was preparing for a potential invasion of Japan, likely sometime during late 1945 or early 1946. As a result of the need to have jet fighters available to the Navy for Operations Olympic and Coronet, the Navy ordered four carrier-based jet-powered fighters:  The Vought XF6U-1 Pirate, the similar products from McDonnell, the McDonnell XFD-1 Phantom, the McDonnell XF2D-1 Banshee, and the North American XFJ-1 Fury.

6146751770 5aabe73d96 o Robert Sullivan
FJ-1 Fury image via NNAM

The First Fury

NAA plan NA-134 produced the XFJ-1, a single-engine jet-powered design with low-mounted straight wings, conventional empennage with pronounced dihedral for the horizontal surfaces, and a straight-through engine intake/exhaust configuration. The wings had retractable, slatted air brakes on the upper and lower surfaces. Powered by a General Electric J35 axial-flow turbojet producing 4,000 pounds of thrust and armed with six .50 caliber machine guns, the XFJ-1 looked good enough that the Navy ordered 100 of them in May of 1945. The jet flew for the first time on 11 September 1946.

FJ 1 on elevator of USS Boxer CV 21 1948
FJ-1 Fury on the boat image via NNAM

Heading to the Boat

Only 30 examples of the FJ-1 ever entered service with the Navy, all of them between October 1947 and April 1948 with VF-5A. On the production aircraft, the wing-mounted air brakes were replaced with fuselage-mounted air brakes. Like the early McDonnell F2H Banshees, the FJ-1 was equipped with a small wheel co-mounted on the modified nose wheel strut, allowing the jet to kneel with its nose low (and its tail elevated) so it could be tucked under the tail of the aircraft parked in front of it aboard the boat. On 16 March 1948, VF-5A operated from the Essex-class aircraft carrier USS Boxer (CV-21) for the first time.

XFJ 1 bending nose gear NAN10 47 1
XFJ-1 kneeling. Image via NNAM

For More of the Fury Story Bang NEXT PAGE Below