President Donald Trump is ordering his administration to declassify all government records about Amelia Earhart and her famous disappearance almost 90 years ago.
The pioneering aviator was attempting to become the first women to fly around the world, when she and and her navigator, Fred Noonan, vanished in the South Pacific with their Lockheed 10-E Electra.
Earhart and Noonan
“Amelia made it almost three quarters around the World before she suddenly, and without notice, vanished, never to be seen again,” said Trump in a social media post. “Her disappearance has captivated millions. I am ordering my Administration to declassify and release all Government Records related to Amelia Earhart, her final trip, and everything else about her.”
Many conspiracy theories have come and gone through the decades. Researchers have also thought they found the plane numerous times, but nothing has ever resulted in actually finding them or the plane.
President Trump Orders Amelia Earhart Files Declassified 5
Surveyors think they have found the sunken plane
In the last couple years, deep sea surveyors with Deep Sea Visions think they found the plane. Sonar images from a recent expedition show what appears to be an aircraft, 16,000 feet at the bottom of the Pacific. A mile deeper than the Titanic.
The team followed the “Date Line Theory”, developed by former NASA employee and pilot, Liz Smith. It suggests that Noonan was exhausted after 17 hours of flying, and simply forgot to turn back the date from July 3 to July 2 as they crossed the International Date Line. Such a mistake would have caused a 60-mile navigational error.
sonar image. Credit deep sea visions
The crew focused their search near Howland Island, where Earhart and Noonan were headed to refuel when they disappeared. They searched more than 5,200 square miles, more than all previous searches combined.
”There’s no known other crashes in the area, and certainly not of that era or with that design of the plane’s tail that you see clearly in the image,” says CEO Tony Romeo.
President Trump Orders Amelia Earhart Files Declassified 6
Their next expedition will take a remotely operated submersible with cameras to the site, for a closer look at what the sonar image really is, and confirm if it is in fact the plane.
Breeze Airways has achieved a milestone that few US carriers have reached in recent memory.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has granted Breeze flag carrier status, clearing the way for international service beginning in early 2026. Breeze is the first US airline to win this designation since Virgin America in 2016, and with that approval, the carrier will soon be spreading its wings into Mexico and the Caribbean.
It was no secret that Breeze’s goal was to fly internationally. In fact, the carrier has reportedly been chasing the designation since 2023.
Still, for an airline that only launched operations in 2021, the move represents impressively rapid progress. Breeze built its reputation on connecting underserved domestic markets with efficient point-to-point flights, often linking cities that had long been overlooked by larger competitors. Now, with flag carrier status in hand, the carrier is preparing to test its model on international routes.
A nighttime shot of Breeze Airways Airbus A220-300s at the gate | IMAGE: Breeze Airways via Facebook
Breeze’s inaugural international network will roll out in stages, beginning in January 2026. The first flights will focus on popular leisure destinations in Mexico, Jamaica, and the Dominican Republic. Here’s the full schedule of announced routes:
Norfolk International Airport (ORF) to Cancún International Airport (CUN) – launches 10 January, 1x weekly, seasonal
Charleston International Airport (CHS) to Cancún International Airport (CUN) – launches 17 January, 1x weekly, seasonal
Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY) to Cancún International Airport (CUN) – launches 7 February, 1x weekly, seasonal
T.F. Green International Airport (PVD) to Cancún International Airport (CUN) – launches 14 February, 1x weekly, seasonal
Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) to Sangster International Airport (MBJ), Montego Bay – launches 5 March, 2x weekly, seasonal
Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) to Punta Cana International Airport (PUJ), Dominican Republic – launches 4 March, 2x weekly, seasonal
Tampa International Airport (TPA) to Sangster International Airport (MBJ), Montego Bay – launches 11 February, 1x weekly, seasonal
US Departure Airport
International Destination
Start Date (2026)
Frequency
Seasonal
Norfolk International Airport (ORF)
Cancún International Airport (CUN), Mexico
10 January
1x weekly
Yes
Charleston International Airport (CHS)
Cancún International Airport (CUN), Mexico
17 January
1x weekly
Yes
Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY)
Cancún International Airport (CUN), Mexico
7 February
1x weekly
Yes
T.F. Green International Airport (PVD)
Cancún International Airport (CUN), Mexico
14 February
1x weekly
Yes
Tampa International Airport (TPA)
Sangster International Airport (MBJ), Jamaica
11 February
2x weekly
Yes
Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU)
Punta Cana International Airport (PUJ), Dominican Republic
4 March
2x weekly
Yes
Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU)
Sangster International Airport (MBJ), Jamaica
5 March
2x weekly
Yes
All services are currently planned as low-frequency, seasonal operations. This common, cautious approach allows Breeze to evaluate demand before scaling up.
A New Crew Base at RDU
A Breeze Airways Airbus A220-300 departed Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) | IMAGE: Raleigh-Durham International Airport via Facebook
To support these new flights, Breeze will establish a crew base at Raleigh-Durham International Airport (RDU) in early 2026. The base is expected to employ roughly 200 pilots and flight attendants and will serve as a cornerstone for the airline’s new international operations. Positioning a crew base in RDU reflects the strategic importance Breeze places on the mid-Atlantic region, as well as its commitment to expanding in markets that have been historically underserved.
RDU has become a critical part of Breeze’s network and has seen exponential growth there in recent years. Currently, Breeze operates 40 daily flights to 32 nonstop destinations from RDU.
It is worth noting that Breeze will have competition on at least one of these routes. Avelo Airlines currently flies from RDU to PUJ, and American Airlines is set to launch that route in December.
Aligning with Breeze’s Long-Term Vision
The Breeze Airways Route Map as of September 2025 | IMAGE: Breeze Airways
This expansion into international markets is a natural evolution of Breeze’s long-term growth strategy. Earlier this year, founder and CEO David Neeleman outlined his goal of serving 150 cities by 2030. The carrier has consistently targeted routes that bypass traditional hub congestion, instead offering direct service from secondary and mid-sized US cities to destinations that were previously difficult to reach without multiple connections.
The Airbus A220 fleet plays a central role in this vision. With its efficiency and range, the A220 allows Breeze to open routes that larger aircraft would make unprofitable and smaller aircraft would struggle to serve. As Breeze grows its fleet, the airline has signaled that international flying beyond Mexico and the Caribbean is on the horizon, with Central and South America as potential next steps.
Opportunities and Challenges of International Operations
Breeze Airways Airbus A220-300 in flight | IMAGE: Breeze Airways
Becoming a flag carrier is a significant achievement, but international operations bring added complexity. Breeze will need to navigate bilateral agreements, secure ground handling partners abroad, and manage customs and immigration operations at both ends of each route. The choice to begin with seasonal, once- or twice-weekly flights shows that Breeze is moving carefully, using leisure-heavy destinations to test demand.
Competition will be another factor. While Breeze is the first to launch certain nonstop city pairs, Cancún, Montego Bay, and Punta Cana are well-established markets served by legacy carriers and low-cost competitors alike…from many US cities. Breeze will be betting that its formula of “nice, simple, affordable” flying — paired with nonstop service from overlooked cities — will resonate in the same way it has domestically.
The bigger story here is that Breeze has joined an exclusive club. Becoming the first US airline in nearly a decade to earn FAA approval as a flag carrier is not only symbolic but also a tangible recognition of the airline’s rapid maturity and operational competence.
Breeze’s move means new options for reaching international destinations for travelers in Norfolk, Charleston, Providence, and other mid-sized cities, without backtracking through major hubs.
As Breeze steps into its next chapter, the big question is how far and how fast it will grow internationally. But for now, one thing is clear: at a time when the ULCC model is being tested, Breeze is defying the odds and moving full steam ahead on its goal of 150 cities by 2030.
The Maryland Air National Guard (ANG) said goodbye to their last two A-10s this week. It marks the end of Maryland’s ANG flying operations, making Maryland the first state to be without a ANG flying mission.
The 175th Wing hosted a formal goodbye to the aircraft at Martin Airport, Warfield Air National Guard Base in Middle River, MD., and deactivated the Air Guard’s 175th Operations Group, 175th Maintenance Group and all subordinate units. Governor Wes Moore and military leaders spoke, paying tribute to the aircraft and the men and women who made it happen.
Maryland ANG Says Goodbye to Their Last A-10s 15
“Thank you to every Airman who has worn these patches, turned wrenches on these jets, flown these missions, and given so much of themselves to this noble calling,” said Maryland ANG Brig. Gen. Drew E. Dougherty. “You will always be part of the proud history of the Maryland ANG, these two outstanding Groups, and you will always carry on our proud and distinguished legacy.”
All A-10s will be retired by 2026
Although the A-10 is being retired, the last two planes from Maryland have been transferred to the Michigan ANG. Maryland ANG’s other A-10s were flown earlier this year to the Arizona boneyard at Davis-Monthan AFB.
Maryland ANG Says Goodbye to Their Last A-10s 16
The fight to retire or save the A-10 lasted for years, but eventually Congress agreed to retire them, and so the sun is setting on the A-10. The USAF is even accelerating their decommissioning, budgeting $57 million to have all A-10s retired in 2026.
The loss of Maryland ANG’s A-10s also comes as part of a USAF plan to turn the 175th into a cyber wing. Maryland ANG had to divest all of their A-10s from the 104th Fighter Squadron by Sep 30, 2025.
From A-10s to Cyberspace
Maryland ANG Says Goodbye to Their Last A-10s 17
The 104th was the longest-standing operational A-10 SQN, with a storied history and heritage going back more than 100 years. About 550 people with the 104th will now move onto other things, including various cyber roles with the 175th Cyberspace Operations Group, which executes offensive and defensive cyber operations and includes an intelligence squadron.
USAF hopes that the new wing will create a natural synergy with nearby Fort Meade, which hosts U.S. Cyber Command HQ, the National Security Agency, and the Air Force’s 70th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing.
Maryland ANG Says Goodbye to Their Last A-10s 18
“Some of our pilots, some of our maintainers, they’re going to keep doing what they do, but with another unit,” said Deputy Wing Commander Dave Wright, “Some in the local area. Some not. It just depends of how it works for them.”
“While the mission is changing, the role of defending this country has not changed,” added Wright, “So a lot of these folks are going to be the sheepdogs that are protecting Americans. They’re just going to be doing it in a different mission space.”
Lockheed’s legendary Skunk Works just unveiled a new autonomous wingman for warfighters. Check out their new stealth drone, VECTIS. But will the Air Force want it? And for how much money?
Lockheed says it will be flying in two years, and will be compatible with both 5th and 6th Gen fighters. Watch the CGI promo they released this week below:
An attractive option for future Air Force competitions
“Vectis will provide U.S. and allied warfighters with range, endurance, and multi-mission flexibility, including air-to-air, air-to-surface, and intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance,” said OJ Sanchez, president of Skunk Works.
The runway-based, low-maintenance drone is an attractive option for any future competitions the Air Force may request. Sanchez did not elaborate on costs.
Vectis was likely made for the Air Force’s increment 1 CCA bid (Collaborative Combat Aircraft program) that Lockheed lost, because it was basically considered too high-end at the time. USAF was not interested in all the “bells and whistles”.
Check Out Skunk Works New Stealth Drone VECTIS 21
The company, appears to have finished development anyway, and with this announcement still hopes to get a customer for Vectis. The Air Force has not yet publicly revealed any plans for CCA Increment 2, but Lockheed says Vectis is a great candidate.
Was Vectis Spotted by Satellite at Area 51?
Lockheed won’t elaborate much on the new delta-wing aircraft’s development, but Sanchez did say Vectis is somewhere in size between a F-16 and the company’s new Common Multi-Mission Truck cruise missile.
He did add that Vectis will not fly supersonic.
Photo credit Planet Labs, Inc
Here’s an interesting satellite photo of something that looks similar to Vectis, next to a hangar at Area 51 in 2022:
On 16 September 2025, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued Safety Alert for Operators (SAFO) 25003, telling airlines to step up their safety messaging about one of the most stubborn problems in modern air travel: passengers who try to evacuate with their bags.
The language of the SAFO is clear. The alert “serves to emphasize the operational and safety-critical importance of strict passenger compliance with crewmember instructions during emergency evacuations.” In other words, when the aircraft is on fire or filling with smoke, your roller bag does not matter. Yet, incident after incident has shown that passengers ignore that instruction, creating dangerous bottlenecks and slowing down an evacuation when every second counts.
The FAA Safety Alert Highlights the Risks Behind the Bags
Overhead bins on an aircraft | IMAGE: By User:Mattes – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1732569
Not that they needed to, but the FAA once again highlighted the hazards of retrieving personal belongings and carry-ons in emergency situations.
Passengers hauling bags through the aisles can block exits, trip others, and even puncture evacuation slides. They delay everyone else trying to get out, pushing the evacuation time beyond survivability thresholds. In smoke-filled cabins or amid structural damage, those delays can mean the difference between walking away and not making it out at all.
The agency is asking airlines to review their safety briefings, training, and announcements to make sure the “leave everything behind” message is loud and clear. That includes standardized language in preflight safety demonstrations, stronger exit-row briefings, and even new visuals in airports and boarding areas that drive home the point.
The recommendations also reach into Safety Management Systems, encouraging operators to treat this as a hazard that can be identified, mitigated, and measured. The FAA wants a coordinated approach, from flight attendants’ commands to public awareness campaigns, using everything from universally recognized pictograms to messaging about collective responsibility. The idea is to establish new social norms: everybody leaves their bags behind.
The Problem is Rampant, and Social Media Proves It
This issue has been brewing for some time. However, several high-profile evacuations this year revealed just how deeply ingrained the problem has become.
Passengers evacuate American Airlines Flight 3023 with baggage during an incident at DEN in July 2025 | IMAGE: Social Media Screenshot
Endeavor Flight 4819, a Delta Connection CRJ-900, flipped on landing at Toronto Pearson in February. Twenty-one people were injured, and videos showed passengers clutching their carry-ons as they scrambled away from the wreckage.
American Airlines Flight 1006, a 737-800, caught fire after landing in Denver in March. Passengers slid down evacuation chutes with backpacks and roller bags in hand.
American Airlines Flight 3023, a 737 MAX 8, was evacuated in July after a tire fire in Denver. Again, passengers ignored instructions and took their bags.
Hawaiian Airlines Flight 15, an A330, saw nearly 300 people evacuate in San Diego after a bomb threat in May. Many of them grabbed luggage before sliding down.
Delta Air Lines Flight 1213, another A330, evacuated in Orlando after an engine fire. Baggage was spotted everywhere.
These are just the most visible examples, amplified by social media videos that show in real time how little the safety briefing seems to matter.
The FAA’s recommendations are reasonable, and it is likely that airlines will quickly update cards, announcements, and crew training to reflect the alert. Passengers will hear more direct phrasing, see new visuals, and perhaps even notice safety campaigns in airports. But will that be enough to stop people from reaching for their bags in a crisis?
Frankly, we are not sure. Safety briefings already tell passengers to leave everything behind. Yet in the heat of the moment, instinct seems to take over. Some grab their phones, others their laptops or purses. The result is the same: slower evacuations and more risk for everyone.
Perhaps the threat of stronger consequences would help. Airlines could consider banning passengers who ignore crew commands during emergencies. Regulators might even explore legal penalties. Even without prosecution, the prospect of losing flying privileges could deter at least some offenders.
Our Take: Safety First. Always.
One thing is clear: the current system is not working. Flight attendants have a demanding job, and they repeat the same safety lines hundreds of times each week. Passengers tune out, treating the briefing as background noise. But those words exist for a reason. The announcement about leaving bags behind is not filler. It is a directive that saves lives.
If airlines can find a way to make passengers take that directive seriously, we will all be safer. Whether it is clearer language, stronger visuals, or even consequences for non-compliance, something has to change. Because in an emergency evacuation, the only thing that matters is people.
Marine One executed an emergency landing at a local airfield in England on Thursday, 18 September, delaying President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump’s departure from the United Kingdom by about 20 minutes.
The incident occurred as the presidential helicopter departed Chequers, the country residence of UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, following a joint press conference. The helicopter was en route to London Stansted Airport (STN), approximately 64 miles northeast, where Air Force One awaited for the return flight to Washington, D.C.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the details in a statement.
“Due to a minor hydraulic issue, and out of an abundance of caution, the pilots landed at a local airfield before reaching Stansted Airport, where Air Force One was waiting to take them back to Washington,” Leavitt said. “The president and first lady safely boarded the support helicopter.”
Due to a minor hydraulic issue, and out of an abundance of caution, the pilots landed at a local airfield before reaching Stansted Airport.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt
The Trumps transferred to a backup helicopter and completed the short hop to STN without further incident, boarding Air Force One shortly after the 20-minute delay.
Stansted, located 42 miles northeast of central London, serves as a preferred gateway for foreign dignitaries visiting the UK. Its expansive facilities and position outside the crowded airspace of Heathrow (LHR) and Gatwick (LGW) provide operational flexibility for high-profile arrivals and departures.
Marine One: Presidential Rotary Transport Abroad
U.S. Marines unload Marine One from a C-17 Globemaster III | IMAGE: US Air Force by Airman 1st Class Briana Cespedes
Marine One designates any US Marine Corps helicopter carrying the president, primarily operated by Marine Helicopter Squadron One (HMX-1) “Nighthawks” from Marine Corps Air Facility Quantico, Virginia. The current fleet includes the Sikorsky VH-3D Sea King, VH-60N White Hawk, and the newer VH-92A Patriot, all featuring the distinctive “White Top” livery.
These helicopters do not fly overseas routes independently. With a range of about 450 miles and top speeds around 160 mph, models like the VH-3D are suited for short- to medium-haul missions, such as White House-to-Camp David transfers. For overseas travel, the aircraft are disassembled and transported aboard US Air Force airlifters, including the C-17 Globemaster III or C-5M Super Galaxy. HMX-1 crews then reassemble and test them on site, deploying with backup units and maintenance support.
HMX-1 Squadron One fleet | IMAGE: US Air Force photo by Rochelle Naus
The squadron maintains 35 helicopters across four types (the three listed earlier, plus MV-22 Ospreys, which are very rarely used for presidential transport), crewed by more than 800 Marines. Operations emphasize security, with formations of up to five identical aircraft serving as decoys, plus countermeasures like chaff, flares, and infrared jammers. Every personnel involved undergoes Yankee White clearance.
Marine One’s Fleet History and Evolution
A VH-34D on the South Lawn of the White House in 1961 | IMAGE: John F. Kennedy Library photo KN-C18018, Public Domain
Presidential helicopter transport began in 1957 with President Dwight D. Eisenhower using a Bell UH-13J Sioux for a short trip to his Pennsylvania summer home. The Sikorsky H-34 followed in 1958, replaced by the VH-3A in 1961. The VH-3D entered service in 1978, joined by the VH-60N in 1987.
Post-9/11 security demands prompted the VXX replacement program. After the 2009 cancellation of Lockheed Martin’s VH-71 Kestrel due to $13 billion in cost overruns, Sikorsky secured a $1.2 billion contract in 2014 for the VH-92A, based on the S-92. The first VH-92A flew as Marine One in August 2024, carrying President Joe Biden in Chicago.
Marine One, with President George W. Bush and Mrs. Laura Bush aboard, departing the South Lawn of the White House, 31 October 2008, en route to Camp David | IMAGE: National Archives
HMX-1 also supports senior officials and dignitaries, often linking to Air Force One at bases like Joint Base Andrews. Ground protocols include Marine sentries in dress uniforms, and the squadron’s helos are routinely airlifted–even on standby–for global presidential travel.
Thursday’s precautionary landing marks a rare hiccup for the meticulously-maintained fleet. The last mechanical issue occurred in 2006, when Marine One failed to start for President George W. Bush, forcing a switch to a motorcade.
The President and First Lady departed STN shortly after the brief delay, boarding Air Force One for the transatlantic flight home. Officials attributed the incident to standard precautionary protocols for hydraulic systems.
On 11 September, the desert at Edwards Air Force Base got a little busier. A second B-21 Raider dropped in from Palmdale after what Northrop Grumman called a “robust test flight.” That phrase might read like boilerplate, but for anyone around a flight test squadron, it’s a pretty big deal.
With two flying airframes now on the ramp, the 412th Test Wing’s Combined Test Force finally has the tools to move beyond proving basic airworthiness and start stress-testing what the Raider is really built to do.
A second B-21 Raider, the nation’s sixth-generation stealth bomber, joins flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept. 11, 2025. The program is a cornerstone of the Department of the Air Force’s nuclear modernization strategy, designed to deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. (Courtesy photo)
One aircraft can show you how it flies. Two let you split the workload. With both B-21s assigned to the 420th Flight Squadron at Edwards, one jet can keep pushing the envelope (handling qualities, speed regimes, climb profiles). At the same time, the other dives into the more complex questions of mission systems and weapons integration.
Meanwhile, the ground-test article back at Plant 42 keeps grinding away on structural loads and systems checks. It’s the classic flight test triangle: one bird stretching its wings, one bird proving the electronics and weapons fit, and one airframe taking the punishment on the ground.
With the arrival of the second B-21 Raider, our flight test campaign gains substantial momentum.
Troy Meink, US Air Force Secretary
Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink explained the significance of the second test airframe.
“With the arrival of the second B-21 Raider, our flight test campaign gains substantial momentum,” Meink said. “We can now expedite critical evaluations of mission systems and weapons capabilities, directly supporting the strategic deterrence and combat effectiveness envisioned for this aircraft.”
Building Pace in the Test Program
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony December 2, 2022 in
Palmdale, Calif. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. (U.S. Air Force photo)
The first B-21 arrived at Edwards in November 2023. Since then, it’s been handling both flight and ground testing while also being tied to low-rate initial production. The second airframe frees up the tempo. For the Air Force, that means the program can start moving into integration of critical mission systems sooner. These systems include things like sensors, communications, and weapons interfaces.
General David Allvin, Air Force Chief of Staff, stated why it’s critical to the B-21’s journey to operational readiness.
“The addition of a second B-21 to the flight test program accelerates the path to fielding,” said Allvin. “By having more assets in the test environment, we bring this capability to our warfighters faster.”
By having more assets in the test environment, we bring this capability to our warfighters faster.
General David Allvin, US Air Force Chief of Staff
That sense of speed is intentional. Yes, the B-21 flies farther and quieter. But it’s also about building a bomber that can adapt as fast as the threat environment shifts. That’s where the Raider’s open systems architecture becomes the real story.
Open Architecture and the Software-Defined Bomber
B-21 Raider in flight | IMAGE: US Air Force
From the start, Northrop and the Air Force designed the Raider to be a software-driven aircraft. Its mission systems are built on open architecture, meaning it can integrate new sensors, weapons, and electronic warfare packages without a full redesign. In practical terms, that means software loads can redefine what the jet can do from sortie to sortie.
Northrop has signaled that an enhanced software package is in the works to speed upgrades across the Raider fleet. Instead of waiting years for major block changes, the aircraft is designed to adapt in smaller, faster cycles. Each flight at Edwards now doubles as a systems check, proving how code, avionics, and weapons interfaces line up under operational stress.
Parallel Testing Beyond Flight
U.S. Air Force Airmen with the 912th Aircraft Maintenance Squadron prepare to recover the second B-21 Raider to arrive for test and evaluation at Edwards AFB, Calif., Sept. 11, 2025. The arrival of a second test aircraft provides maintainers valuable hands-on experience with tools, data and processes that will support future operational squadrons. (U.S Air Force photo by Kyle Brasier)
Having two Raiders also allows sustainment testing to start early. It’s not glamorous, but every operator knows the war is won in the hangar as much as in the sky.
Multiple aircraft at Edwards mean maintainers can stress-test tooling, validate technical data, and practice turning jets for back-to-back sorties. They can find out where the bottlenecks are in logistics and where the sustainment documentation falls short. That feedback loop will be critical for the three main operating bases—Ellsworth, Whiteman, and Dyess—where major infrastructure projects are already underway.
Once the Raider is operational, Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma will handle the sustainment enterprise, and the lessons learned at Edwards will shape how that system works in practice.
The Numbers and Comparisons
A second B-21 Raider, the nation’s sixth-generation stealth bomber, joins flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept. 11. The program is a cornerstone of the Department of the Air Force’s nuclear modernization strategy, designed to deliver both conventional and nuclear payloads. (Courtesy photo)
It is interesting to note (and many have been surprised by) the size difference between the B-2 and the B-21. The Raider is smaller than the B-2 Spirit but is designed for a more extended range and a lower Radar Cross Section (RCS).
Weapons bay: ~20,000 lb capacity, with overall payload estimates near 30,000 lb
Compare that to the B-2, which spreads 172 feet of wingspan, has a MTOW of 376,500 pounds, and carries a 40,000-pound payload. The B-21’s smaller size means it carries less per sortie, but its stealth profile is sharper, its sustainment simpler, and its unit cost far lower: about $700 million compared to $2 billion for each B-2. The Air Force plans to buy at least 100 Raiders, making fleet size itself a form of combat power.
For context, here’s a snapshot of how the B-21 measures up against its predecessors. The numbers highlight the tradeoffs in size, payload, cost, and survivability that shaped each design.
Aircraft
First Flight
Wingspan
Max Takeoff Weight
Payload
Unit Cost (approx.)
Fleet Size (active/planned)
B-21 Raider
2023
132 ft
~180,000 lb
~30,000 lb
$700M
100+ (planned)
B-2 Spirit
1989
172 ft
376,500 lb
40,000 lb
$2B
19 (active)
B-52 Stratofortress
1952
185 ft
488,000 lb
70,000 lb
$84M (in 1960s dollars; upgraded since)
72 (active)
Notes:
The B-21’s smaller size means less payload per aircraft, but a much lower radar cross section and simpler sustainment.
The Air Force plans a far larger B-21 fleet than the B-2 ever achieved, making massed sorties possible.
The B-52 remains unmatched in payload and endurance but lacks stealth; its longevity reflects continuous upgrades rather than survivability in contested airspace.
Bottom line: the Raider won’t haul like a BUFF or hit as heavy as a Spirit, but it’s built to slip past defenses, upgrade fast, and show up in numbers—that’s what makes it the future of the bomber force.
Strategic Context
The B-21 Raider was unveiled to the public at a ceremony Dec. 2, 2022, in Palmdale, Calif. Designed to operate in tomorrow’s high-end threat environment, the B-21 will play a critical role in ensuring America’s enduring airpower capability. (U.S. Air Force photo)
The Raider is designed to deliver both nuclear and conventional weapons. It will eventually replace the B-1B Lancer and the B-2 Spirit, and over time, even the venerable (and elderly, yet trustworthy) B-52 Stratofortress. Obviously, that transition won’t happen overnight. Air Force Global Strike Command will keep the current bomber triad flying until the B-21 is fielded in meaningful numbers. But the goal is clear: by 2040, the B-21 will be the backbone of the nation’s long-range strike force.
The program traces back to 2011’s classified Long Range Strike Bomber initiative, with formal development kicking off in 2015. First flight happened on 10 November 2023, and while the Air Force hasn’t announced an initial operational capability date, outside estimates now suggest 2027.
The Air Force revealed the B-21 Raider on 2 December 2022, during an unveiling ceremony hosted and sponsored by the Northrop Grumman Corporation at its production facilities in Palmdale, California.
Why This Arrival Matters
A B-21 Raider conducts flight testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., Sept 18, 2024. Flight testing includes ground testing, taxiing and flying operations allowing the B-21 to be the backbone of the service’s future bomber force, and will possess the range, access and payload to penetrate the most highly-contested threat environments and hold any target around the globe at risk | IMAGE: US Air Force
The second Raider’s landing at Edwards is significant because it signals that the program is moving from cautious first steps into a faster rhythm. Flight testers can now push more sorties and pull in deeper data with fewer bottlenecks. Maintainers can shape the sustainment playbook early before squadron service begins. Strategists view it as proof that the Air Force is on track to field a sixth-generation stealth bomber before the decade closes.
The B-21 Raider honors the Doolittle Raiders of World War II, who launched a daring strike against Japan in April 1942. The name is fitting. Like its namesake, the Raider is designed to show up where the enemy least expects it. On 11 September 2025, that vision edged a step closer to reality, as the second jet rolled to a stop on the Edwards flight line, waiting for the next round of tests.
Is Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop program canceled? Not exactly.
Back in August 2022, we ran an article about Embraer’s ambitious plan to reinvent the turboprop.
The Brazilian manufacturer was talking big: a modern regional aircraft that would blend the efficiency of a propeller-driven design with the comfort and speed passengers associate with jets. Letters of intent for more than 250 aircraft rolled in at the Farnborough Air Show, and Embraer projected an entry into service by 2028.
It was an exciting time. The regional jet had dominated headlines for years, but the turboprop—long a workhorse of regional connectivity—suddenly looked like it might have a new lease on life.
Fast forward to the end of 2025, and the picture looks very different. What once seemed like the start of a new chapter for regional aviation has now been shelved indefinitely.
A Program Stalled
Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop | IMAGE: Embraer
In June 2025, Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer told Aviation Week that the turboprop program is “on ice”—and not just lightly chilled. “It is quite far down in the freezer at the moment,” he admitted at the Paris Air Show.
It is quite far down in the freezer at the moment.”
Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer, on the status of Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop Program
The reason comes down to technology. The aircraft Embraer envisioned in 2022 promised to be 20% faster and 15% cheaper to operate per seat than current turboprops, while offering a cabin more in line with the company’s E-Jet family. But to achieve those goals, Embraer needed propulsion technology that simply hasn’t materialized.
By the end of 2022, the company had expected to choose between Pratt & Whitney Canada and Rolls-Royce as an engine supplier. That decision never came. In early 2023, Embraer quietly confirmed delays, and by mid-2025, the verdict was clear: without a suitable engine, the program couldn’t move forward.
The Promise Versus the Reality
Rendering of Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop | IMAGE: Embraer
When we first covered the program, Embraer’s roadmap looked ambitious but achievable. To understand how far things have shifted, it’s worth retracing the program’s journey:
2017 — Embraer first proposes the TPNG (Turboprop Next Generation) concept.
July 2022 (Farnborough Air Show) — More than 250 letters of intent announced.
August 16, 2022 — Our AvGeekery feature highlights the disruptive potential.
End of 2022 — Targeted deadline for engine selection.
Early/Mid-2023 — Planned program launch.
2028 — Entry into service for first variant (50- or 90-seat).
2029 — Second variant to follow.
June 2025 (Paris Air Show) — Program officially “on ice.”
By contrast, as 2025’s end approaches quickly, the reality is stark: no engine has been selected, no program launched, and any hope of an entry into service before the 2030s now looks remote.
Embraer’s Shift in Focus
Embraer’s next-gen turboprop program is “on ice,” in favor of enhancements to the E175 and E190/195 programs | IMAGE: Embraer
With the turboprop shelved, Embraer has turned its attention back to the jets that have carried its commercial success for the past two decades.
The E175-E1 is getting avionics and cabin upgrades, such as improved weather radar, larger overhead bins, and mood lighting. These upgrades are designed to keep it competitive in the US regional market, where scope clauses still restrict the use of heavier E2 variants.
The E190-E2 and E195-E2 continue to anchor Embraer’s commercial lineup. They benefit from cockpit commonality with the E175-E1 and appeal to airlines seeking efficient sub-150-seat jets.
Future possibilities, such as E195-E1 freighter conversions, are being discussed but not yet formalized.
Meijer has been clear: Embraer isn’t walking away from regional aviation. It’s just choosing to invest in incremental improvements to its jets rather than roll the dice on an all-new turboprop.
The Market That Got Away—for Now
Embraer’s next-gen turboprop program is “on ice,” favoring its regional jets | IMAGE: Embraer
The irony is that Embraer was targeting a genuine gap in the market. Since the pandemic, smaller US cities have lost air service as 50-seat jets disappeared from fleets. As Meijer noted this year: “I definitely see a demand in the US for between smaller cities since that segment is shrinking.”
I definitely see a demand in the US for between smaller cities, since that segment is shrinking.
Embraer Commercial Aircraft CEO Arjan Meijer
But who will step up to meet that demand?
Boeing and Airbus have no plans to reenter the turboprop market. The Airbus A220 is a strong performer, but too large for many smaller communities.
ATR is sticking with incremental updates to the ATR 42 and 72, opting against a clean-sheet design.
Bombardier and de Havilland are out of the commercial turboprop game.
China and Russia are unlikely to make inroads in Western markets anytime soon.
That leaves Embraer. And yet, for now, Embraer is content to sit it out.
Forecasts Reset
Embraer’s 20-year outlook for <150 pax aircraft | IMAGE: Embraer
Embraer’s own 2025 Market Outlook reflects this retrenchment. The company now projects global demand for about 10,500 sub-150-seat aircraft through 2044, of which only 1,780 are expected to be turboprops. That’s a marked drop from earlier forecasts of more than 2,100.
The reasons are clear: engine technology isn’t ready, certification risks are high, and airlines in North America and Europe are leaning more toward regional jets than turboprops.
Still, in markets like Asia-Pacific and emerging economies, the economics of turboprops remain attractive. The demand hasn’t disappeared—it’s just waiting for the right aircraft to capture it.
Embraer’s Next-Gen Turboprop Remains Disruptive, But Not for the Right Reason
IMAGE: Embraer
When we first covered Embraer’s next-gen turboprop in 2022, it was billed as a program that could redefine regional aviation. The numbers looked strong, the interest was genuine, and the momentum was building.
Three years later, the narrative has shifted dramatically. The turboprop program isn’t dead, but it’s “quite far down in the freezer,” as Arjan Meijer put it. The gap in the market is still there, the demand is still real, but the aircraft that was supposed to meet it remains frozen in development limbo.
For now, Embraer is focused on what it already does best: refining the E-Jet family and extending its commercial success in the sub-150-seat jet market. Whether the company eventually returns to turboprops will depend not just on Embraer’s ambition, but on whether propulsion technology can catch up with its vision.
And so, Embraer’s next-gen turboprop remains exactly what we called it in our first article: disruptive. Only this time, the disruption is the absence of progress, leaving a hole in the regional market that no one else seems ready to fill.
The last flight lands: JetBlue retires its final E190 with a JFK–Boston service, closing nearly 20 years of operations.
A small jet, a big legacy: The E190 shaped JetBlue’s network and gave passengers mainline comfort on short-haul routes.
Still flying strong abroad: From Alliance Airlines in Australia to KLM Cityhopper in Europe, the E190 remains a global workhorse.
A new US chapter begins: Less than 24 hours after JetBlue said goodbye, Avelo Airlines placed a massive order for the E195-E2, marking the type’s American debut.
JetBlue Airways closed the book on an era this week.
Flight 190, operating on Tuesday, 9 September, from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) to Boston Logan International Airport (BOS), touched down and marked the official retirement of the Embraer E190 from JetBlue’s fleet.
The route JetBlue Flight 190 operated for its final E190 flight on 9 Sept 25 | IMAGE: FlightAware
On a beautiful early September morning, the ceremonial final flight departed JFK at 1240 local time and arrived at BOS at 1338 local time–nearly 30 minutes early. In a fitting tribute to the type, the flight was piloted by Warren Christie, JetBlue COO and pilot, who also flew the inaugural E190 flight for JetBlue two decades ago.
The retirement of the E190 was a bittersweet moment for JetBlue. The type was the carrier’s oldest and smallest aircraft, but it was important in shaping its early identity, expanding its reach, and proving that “low-cost” and “premium” could coexist on short-haul routes.
And yet, less than 24 hours after JetBlue said goodbye, another US carrier signaled a different future. Avelo Airlines announced a blockbuster order for the Embraer E195-E2, becoming the first American airline to commit to the next generation of E-Jets. For Embraer, it was the break they’ve been waiting for for years: the E2 is coming to America.
A Brazilian Design That Redefined the Middle Market
JetBlue was the launch customer for the E190 in 2005 | IMAGE: JetBlue
When Embraer launched the E190 program in the late 1990s, it sought to fill the wide gap between regional jets and narrowbodies. Instead of stretching the ERJ-145, the Brazilian manufacturer went clean-sheet, unveiling the E-Jet family at the 1999 Paris Air Show. The 100-seat E190 emerged as the centerpiece, equipped with a stretched fuselage, twin General Electric CF34-10E turbofan engines, and a range up to 2,819 nautical miles.
The type first flew in March 2004 and entered service a year later after FAA certification. The E190’s formula—mainline comfort in a right-sized package—caught on quickly. The 2-2 cabin, absence of middle seats, and generous overhead bins won over passengers, while its economics appealed to airlines targeting underserved markets.
Globally, the aircraft became a commercial success, with more than 500 delivered. The 566th, 567th, and 568th airframes were delivered to Egyptian wet-lease carrier, CIAF Leasing, in December 2022. Its later successor, the E2 series, brought geared turbofans and 20% better efficiency. However, the original E190, now two decades old, continues to serve as a reliable backbone for many international operators.
JetBlue and the E190: A Partnership That Paid Off
A JetBlue Embraer 190, N337JB, at Providenciales Airport, Turks & Caicos (PLS). Awaiting departure to Fort Lauderdale (FLL) | IMAGE: Sunnya343 – CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
No US airline was more closely associated with the E190 than JetBlue. In 2003, the young New York carrier stunned the industry with an order for 100 of the type, making it the global launch customer. Founder David Neeleman envisioned a jet that could open secondary markets without sacrificing JetBlue’s signature product.
The first E190 joined the fleet in September 2005. Two months later, it launched scheduled service between BOS and JFK—the same route that marked its retirement this week. The milestone flight was a fitting bookend to two decades of service.
Configured with 100 leather seats, live TV, free Wi-Fi, and 32 inches of pitch, the E190 allowed JetBlue to grow beyond major trunk routes. It became the backbone of service to mid-sized cities like Rochester, Buffalo, and Burlington, while also flying shuttles in the congested Northeast corridor. At its peak, more than 60 E190s operated over 100 daily flights, introducing millions of travelers to JetBlue’s distinct onboard product.
“The E190 was instrumental in our early years and proved to deliver on critical connectivity in short-haul markets, allowing us to grow into new regions, especially in our New York and Boston focus cities,” said Christie. “It is an honor to pilot our final E190 revenue flight.”
It is an honor to pilot our final E190 revenue flight.
Warren Christie, JetBlue COO and captain of both the inaugural and final JetBlue E190 flight
The jet earned a reputation among pilots and crews for solid handling and quick turnarounds. Its fly-by-wire controls and Honeywell Primus Epic avionics made it well-suited for the busy Northeast corridor. Many pilots described the E190 as “a pilot’s airplane”—responsive in congested airspace, nimble on approach, and efficient on the ground.
Still, the aircraft was not without headaches. Early CF34 engine issues required fixes, and maintenance costs mounted as the fleet aged into its mid-teens. Even so, the type’s contribution to JetBlue’s growth–not to mention its reputation for bringing humanity back to air travel–remains undeniable.
Why Retire the E190 Now?
IMAGE: JetBlue
The decision comes down to economics and efficiency. Fuel costs have climbed, older airframes need more upkeep, and replacement parts for the CF34 engines are harder to come by. On a per-seat basis, the E190 burns roughly 25% more fuel than its replacement, the Airbus A220-300.
JetBlue is now focused on a simplified fleet of Airbus aircraft. The A220-300, with 140 seats, longer range, and lower emissions, is already taking over many of the routes the E190 once flew. With more than 50 delivered so far, the transition is well underway. Beyond fuel savings, the move reduces pilot training complexity, streamlines maintenance, and positions JetBlue for growth across both short-haul and transcontinental markets.
Selling off retired E190s to lessors and aftermarket specialists has also unlocked value. Firms like Azorra and Werner Aero are acquiring frames and engines, many of which will find second lives overseas.
In addition to its 52 A220-300s, JetBlue operates 125 A320-200s, 63 A321-200s, and 37 A321neos.
The E190’s Place in the Aviation World in 2025
IMAGE: JetBlue
JetBlue’s retirement of the E190 closes the book on the type’s US mainline story. Once a familiar sight shuttling between New York, Boston, and dozens of secondary cities, the aircraft has now vanished from the scheduled fleets of major American carriers. Regional affiliates still operate the smaller E170 and E175, constrained by scope clauses, but the 100-seat E190 has slipped quietly into the margins.
Breeze Airways, which leaned on ex-Azul examples in its startup years, has already shifted its attention to the Airbus A220. A few E190s live on in charter service or as VIP Lineage 1000 conversions, but their heyday in the US is clearly over.
The picture looks different abroad. Alliance Airlines keeps dozens flying on regional contracts in Australia, many sourced from JetBlue and other US retirements. Aeroméxico Connect continues to rely on its fleet for domestic connectivity, while KLM Cityhopper and Airlink in South Africa use the type to stitch together busy short-haul networks. China and Latin America also remain strongholds, where the E190’s size and economics are still well-matched to market demand.
Meanwhile, the next generation is taking root. The E2 family—most visibly with Porter Airlines in Canada and Azul in Brazil—builds on the original E-Jet’s strengths, offering better fuel efficiency and longer range while keeping the comfort and feel of a larger airplane in a smaller frame. And, the massive deal announced one day after JetBlue’s final E190 flight, the E195-E2 will be making its debut in the United States very soon.
Avelo’s landmark order is for 50 E195-E2s, with rights to 50 more worth nearly $4.4 billion at list prices. Deliveries are set to begin in 2027, Deliveries will start in 2027, making Avelo the launch customer for the E2 family in America. For Embraer, it’s a much-welcomed sign that while the first-generation E190 is fading at home, its successor is finally making inroads.
One Door Closes…Another One Opens
A lineup of JetBlue E190s in desert storage | IMAGE: JetBlue
JetBlue’s E190 era has officially come to an end. But its impact is unmistakable: it opened new markets, gave the airline flexibility when it was most needed, and delivered a passenger experience that often felt bigger than the plane itself.
As the final jets head off to desert storage, they leave behind a lasting legacy: a small jet that made a big impact…even as the next generation prepares to take flight.
Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal makes it the first U.S. carrier to order Embraer’s largest jet, a $4.4B move set to reshape its fleet from 2027.
In a move few saw coming, Avelo Airlines has made headlines today by placing a firm order for 50 Embraer E195-E2 aircraft with purchase rights for 50 more, in a deal valued at $4.4 billion at list prices.
Deliveries are scheduled to begin in the first half of 2027.
With this announcement, Avelo becomes the launch customer for the E2 family in the United States. Avelo’s decision to bet on the E2 family is a milestone that Embraer has been working toward since the program’s inception.
The E195-E2 gives the Houston-based low-cost carrier a flexible tool to balance growth, efficiency, and network development. Since its launch in 2021, Avelo has built a business model around connecting underserved markets with low fares and reliable service. The airline has relied exclusively on Boeing 737NGs, an older jet that has served them well, but not always the right fit for smaller markets or shorter routes. The E2 fills that gap.
Avelo Airlines E195-E2 Deal is a Step Toward Flexibility and Efficiency
Artist rendering of an Avelo Airlines E195-E2 over New York | IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
The E195-E2 is Embraer’s largest commercial jet, offering up to 132 seats in a single-class configuration. What makes it stand out is not just its size but its performance package. Equipped with Embraer’s proprietary Enhanced Takeoff System (E2TS), the aircraft can operate from shorter runways than many of its peers. For Avelo, that opens opportunities at constrained airports where the 737 may be challenged. It also allows the airline to consider markets with limited infrastructure or stricter performance requirements.
The E195-E2 also burns far less fuel per trip than comparable aircraft, while also producing a smaller noise footprint.
Avelo’s bet is that the E2’s economics and performance will not only keep costs in check but also allow it to expand into markets that larger narrowbodies can’t serve profitably.
Customer Experience in Focus
IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
From the passenger perspective, the E195-E2 offers several advantages that could give Avelo a strategic advantage in the highly competitive low-cost sector. The cabin features a two-by-two seating layout, eliminating the dreaded middle seat. Overhead bins are larger than those found on many regional jets, power outlets are available at every seat, and the aircraft is noticeably quieter than older-generation narrowbodies.
“We are thrilled to partner with Embraer and bring this best-in-class small narrowbody airplane to the United States marketplace,” said Andrew Levy, Avelo’s founder and CEO. “Our customers will love the E2’s comfortable seating, in-seat power ports, large overhead bins, and quiet cabin. The aircraft’s exceptional performance, size, and efficiency make it the perfect choice for the future growth of our scheduled service network.”
A Milestone for Embraer
An E195-E2 from below: high wing aspect ratio and single slotted flaps | IMAGE: By Matti Blume – CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
The Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal is the milestone moment Avelo has been waiting for for years.
The E2 family, which includes the E190-E2 and E195-E2, has been in service for several years with carriers in Latin America, Europe, and Asia. However, cracking the US market has been an elusive goal. Competing against Boeing and Airbus in their home turf has never been easy, and Embraer has had to contend with the strong momentum of Airbus’s A220 program, which has already gained traction with carriers like Delta, Breeze, and JetBlue.
IMAGE: Avelo Airlines
“Avelo complements its narrowbody fleet with the best-in-class E195-E2,” said Arjan Meijer, President and CEO of Embraer Commercial Aviation. “Its exceptional fuel efficiency, quiet operations, and short-field capability will unlock new markets and optimize capacity across its network — all with a cabin that passengers truly love.”
The E2’s success in the United States may hinge on proving that “right-sized” aircraft can deliver consistent profitability in a market where larger jets often dominate. Industry analysts have long debated the viability of smaller narrowbodies in the fleets of U.S. carriers. Some see them as a complication, requiring separate pilot training, simulators, and maintenance programs. Others argue that the efficiency of aircraft like the E195-E2 provides an edge in markets where bigger isn’t always better.
Will the Avelo Airlines E195-E2 Deal Start an Embraer Revolution in the US?
Embraer E195-E2 prototype, seen from front, showing its gull wing | IMAGE: Clemens Vasters CC BY 2.0, https://commons., ikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=60298967
The timing of Avelo’s order is notable. The airline industry is in a period of adjustment as carriers balance fleet renewal with cost control and environmental goals. Boeing continues to face challenges with its 737 MAX program, while Airbus’s order book for the A320neo family is stretching well into the next decade. That dynamic gives Embraer room to carve out a niche for the E2.
Avelo, with its point-to-point model and focus on underserved cities, is well-positioned to put the E195-E2’s capabilities to the test. If the strategy works, it could encourage other US carriers to revisit the economics of adding smaller narrowbodies to their fleets.
The first aircraft are expected to join Avelo’s fleet in 2027, but today’s announcement already feels like a turning point. Embraer has been waiting for the long-awaited validation of the E2 program in the United States, and with this announcement, it has finally happened. For Avelo, which is still a very young carrier trying to find its place in the aviation landscape, it is both a growth opportunity and a statement of intent: that a young, nimble carrier can think differently about fleet strategy and use it as a lever for expansion.
At 50 firm orders and up to 100 total, the Avelo Airlines E195-E2 deal is one of the largest commitments Embraer has seen in years. Whether it opens the floodgates for more US carriers to consider the E2 program remains to be seen.
For now, though, Avelo has placed itself firmly at the center of attention and given Embraer a powerful foothold in the American market.
Thirty-one years have passed since the harrowing crash of USAir Flight 427 on the evening of 8 September 1994.
I remember that evening with piercing clarity.
It was a Thursday, one of those golden late-summer evenings in western Pennsylvania—warm, gentle, a faint haze hanging in the sky. I’d been playing outside with friends after school, not a care in the world. Erie, my hometown, sat about two hours north of Pittsburgh, and on that evening, everything felt calm, ordinary, safe.
Then the ordinary shattered.
The front page of the Erie Daily Times from Erie, PA, on Friday, 9 Sept. 1994, the day after the crash of USAir Flight 427
When I came inside and flipped on the television, the mood in the room changed instantly. Every local station carried the same banner: breaking news, a plane down near Pittsburgh. The weather had been flawless, so the words felt surreal, impossible. And when the anchor said it was a USAir flight from Chicago, my heart stopped. My dad was supposed to be flying home from Chicago that very night, connecting through Pittsburgh.
For a few agonizing minutes, time warped. My mind raced, my hands trembled as I dialed the airline’s 800 number—back then, there were no cell phones or websites to offer instant answers. Those minutes stretched like an eternity, until finally, blessedly, I heard the words: he wasn’t on that flight. Relief washed over me in a tidal wave.
But relief would not come for so many others. For 132 families, the phone brought only silence or words too heavy to bear. Their lives, in that moment, split into a before and an after. Their loved ones were aboard USAir Flight 427.
For them, nothing would ever be the same again.
A Sudden, Violent Descent
Crater on the hillside from the impact of USAir Flight 427 | IMAGE: KDKA
Flight 427 was a routine evening service from Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD) to Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT), operated by a Boeing 737-300 (reg. N513AU). The 55-minute trip was uneventful until the final minutes of descent.
Approaching PIT, Flight 427 was in sequence behind Delta Flight 1083, a Boeing 727, on the same arrival path. Radar data from that night confirmed that spacing was safe at more than four miles apart. At 6,000 feet and roughly 190 knots, the crew acknowledged instructions for the downwind approach for runway 28 right. Then, without warning, the aircraft jolted violently…at about the same time as it entered the wake turbulence of the preceding Delta jet. A series of thumps rattled the cabin as the 737 suddenly rolled hard to the left.
The autopilot snapped off. First Officer Charles Emmett, reacting instantly, slammed a rudder pedal, but the system betrayed him, forcing the rudder hard in the opposite direction. Captain Peter Germano and Emmett fought back with all they had, pulling the yokes right and back, trying to hold the nose up as the stick shaker buzzed its stall warning.
In the cockpit, strain and confusion filled the airwaves. “Hold on!” Germano shouted, again and again. “What the hell is this?”
Under crushing G-forces, his co-pilot gasped, “Oh shit!” Their final desperate command was one word: “Pull!”
At 1903 local time, just 28 seconds after the first jolt, the jet plunged nose-first into a wooded ravine in Hopewell Township, only seven miles from the runway. Traveling at nearly 300 miles per hour, the impact obliterated the aircraft instantly. There were no survivors.
On the ground, people gathered at a nearby soccer field watched in horror as the 737 seemed to fall straight from the sky, followed by fire, silence, and a column of black smoke.
Black smoke rises from the crash site of USAir Flight 427 in the immediate aftermath of the disaster | IMAGE: CBS News
A Tragedy Without Explanation
What baffled investigators was the absence of any warning. The weather was clear. The crew made no distress call. The 737 had no history of catastrophic structural failures. Yet the flight data recorder showed a sudden, uncommanded left roll, one that the pilots could not overcome.
Flight 427 was not the first Boeing 737 to fall from the sky this way.
In 1991, United Airlines Flight 585 had crashed in Colorado Springs under nearly identical circumstances. With no apparent cause, the NTSB had reluctantly declared that crash “undetermined.”
Now, with another 737 lost in almost the same way, the possibility of a systemic flaw raised alarm bells in the aviation community.
Crash Facts: USAir Flight 427
Date: Thursday, 8 September 1994
Flight: USAir 427
Route: Chicago O’Hare (ORD) → Pittsburgh International (PIT)
Aircraft: Boeing 737-3B7 (N513AU)
Occupants: 132 (127 passengers, 5 crew)
Fatalities: 132 (no survivors)
Crash Site: Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania — 7 miles northwest of PIT
Timeline:
1903 hrs local time – Flight cleared to descend through 6,000 ft, acknowledged slowdown to 190 knots.
Seconds later – Aircraft rolled sharply left, entered an unrecoverable dive.
Impact – Nose-first at nearly 300 mph; massive explosion and fire.
Investigation Length: 4 years, 6 months (longest in NTSB history at that time)
Probable Cause: Uncommanded rudder deflection due to jammed servo valve in the rudder power control unit (PCU).
Legacy: Led to redesign of the 737 rudder system, FAA-mandated fleet modifications, and enhanced pilot training.
A Flaw in the Rudder
The investigation into Flight 427 would become the longest in NTSB history at that time. For more than four years, experts dissected wreckage, ran wind-tunnel tests, and simulated failure scenarios.
The reversal theory diagram | IMAGE: FAA via St. Petersburg Times
The cause was traced to the 737’s rudder power control unit, or PCU—the hydraulic system that converts a pilot’s foot movements into rudder action. At its core was a dual servo valve, a precision part designed to direct fluid one way or the other. But under rare circumstances, the valve’s inner slide could stick inside the outer slide. When that happened, the rudder moved in the opposite direction of what the pilots commanded.
Investigators believed that’s exactly what happened to Flight 427. The pilots commanded a right rudder to steady the aircraft; instead, the rudder deflected left. At low altitude and airspeed, recovery was impossible.
Linking the Cases
Recovered wreckage from USAir Flight 427 inside a hangar at Pittsburgh International Airport | IMAGE: Public Domain
The loss of Flight 427 finally confirmed what had long been suspected after the crash of United Airlines Flight 585 in Colorado Springs in 1991. In both cases, Boeing 737s suddenly rolled out of control and plunged to the ground with no warning and no clear cause. At the time, investigators had been forced to label United 585’s cause “undetermined,” a deeply unsatisfying conclusion for both regulators and the families of those lost.
Flight 427’s similarities were impossible to dismiss. Both jets had been in stable approaches, both encountered sudden left rolls, and in both cases, the crews were unable to recover. The circumstantial evidence pointed squarely toward a rudder system failure. What had been a troubling anomaly in 1991 now appeared to be a repeat event.
The circumstantial evidence pointed squarely toward a rudder system failure. What had been a troubling anomaly in 1991 now appeared to be a repeat event.
The final piece of the puzzle came in 1996 with Eastwind Airlines Flight 517, a 737-200 traveling from Trenton-Mercer Airport (TTN) in New Jersey to Richmond International Airport (RIC) in Virginia, which experienced the same uncommanded rudder deflection. However, unlike the earlier flights, the pilots managed to wrestle the aircraft back under control and land safely. Their testimony provided investigators with something they had not had before: living witnesses who described the exact feel of a rudder reversal in real time.
The pattern was undeniable, with three cases spanning five years. In March 1999–nearly five years after the disaster– the NTSB issued its final report on Flight 427, concluding that a rudder malfunction caused the crash. It also amended the probable cause of United 585 to reflect the same finding. The evidence was no longer circumstantial but conclusive.
Boeing expedited redesign of the 737 rudder system, and the FAA mandated modifications for every aircraft in the fleet worldwide. What began as scattered, tragic mysteries had crystallized into a definitive safety breakthrough.
The Rudder Mystery Cases
United Airlines Flight 585 Date: 3 March 1991 Aircraft: Boeing 737-200 Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado Fatalities: 25 Notes: Crashed during approach after an uncommanded left roll. With no clear evidence at the time, the NTSB declared the cause “undetermined.”
USAir Flight 427 Date: 8 September 1994 Aircraft: Boeing 737-300 Location: Hopewell Township, Pennsylvania (near Pittsburgh) Fatalities: 132 Notes: Nearly identical circumstances to United 585. The crash became the turning point that confirmed rudder malfunction as a systemic flaw.
Eastwind Airlines Flight 517 Date: 9 June 1996 Aircraft: Boeing 737-200 Location: En route from Trenton, New Jersey, to Richmond, Virginia Fatalities: None (all aboard survived) Notes: Experienced a sudden, uncommanded roll, but the crew regained control and landed safely. Pilot testimony provided investigators with the first live account of rudder reversal.
Lessons Carried Forward
Delivered to USAir on 8th October 1987 as N382AU. Became N513AU on 10th November 1988. Due to a loss of control due to rudder malfunction on 8th September 1994, this aircraft crashed near Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, USA. Unfortunately, no one survived. |
By Paul Denton, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=147662580
For the families of those lost on Flight 427, answers did not come quickly. The investigation stretched across more than four years, with multiple competing theories debated before the rudder system was confirmed as the cause. Many families became advocates, pressing relentlessly for transparency, funding, and continued technical work. Their persistence kept the investigation alive through periods when progress seemed stalled, and their voice was instrumental in ensuring the NTSB stayed the course.
Flight 427 forever reshaped the way complex accidents were approached. In the early 1990s, crash investigations often focused heavily on the specific circumstances of a single event. What 427 demonstrated was the need to connect data across multiple cases. United 585, USAir 427, and Eastwind 517 could not be solved in isolation, but when viewed together, a consistent pattern emerged. This practice of cross-case analysis became a model for later investigations.
The case also highlighted the importance of high-fidelity testing. Engineers subjected the 737 rudder system to exhaustive hydraulic and thermal tests, simulating conditions that were not considered in earlier certification standards. Advanced flight simulators were employed to recreate the exact aerodynamic loads, cockpit inputs, and upset sequences, giving investigators and pilots the closest possible view of how the aircraft behaved in those final seconds.
Equally important was the use of pilot testimony.
Equally important was the use of pilot testimony. In the Eastwind 517 incident, the crew’s firsthand description of the sudden rudder deflection and their control responses gave investigators a living data set, bridging the gap between abstract engineering analysis and real-world cockpit experience. This emphasis on survivor testimony has since become an established part of major investigations.
Together, these lessons reshaped the culture of accident investigation. Flight 427 showed that patience, persistence, and a willingness to revisit “unsolvable” cases could yield answers, and those answers could (and did) change global aviation safety.
USAir Flight 427: Its Legacy and A Closing Reflection
The memorial at the crash site of USAir Flight 427
Today, the Boeing 737 remains one of the most widely flown airliners in the world, completing thousands of flights daily. Its redesigned rudder system, born out of the investigation into Flight 427, has prevented a repeat of the tragedies that claimed United 585 and USAir 427. The modifications became a global standard, ensuring that the flaw uncovered in the 1990s would never again cost lives.
For the aviation industry, Flight 427 was more than a single accident. It was the case that forced investigators, manufacturers, and regulators to confront the reality that even a small mechanical flaw could bring down a modern jet. It brought to the surface the truth that reliability must never be assumed and that unexplained accidents must be pursued until their secrets are revealed.
For the families, the loss was personal and permanent. Their relentless advocacy ensured that the investigation did not fade into uncertainty but pressed forward until the truth was uncovered. In doing so, they helped drive reforms that continue to protect millions of travelers around the world.
What began in heartbreak became one of aviation’s most important safety milestones.
Every routine landing of a 737 today carries the silent legacy of Flight 427.
This legacy echoes the truth that progress in aviation is often written in loss, and that even the darkest chapters can lead to lasting change.
A special presentation from Pittsburgh’s KDKA-TV marking 2024’s 30th anniversary of the USAir Flight 427 disaster.
B-29 pilot Mark Novak recently accomplished what nobody else has in at least 65 years. Last month, he exceeded 1,000 hours flying the iconic B-29 Superfortress!
There are only 2 of the historic aircraft still flying, and Novak flies them both!
B-29 Pilot Does What Nobody Else Has in at Least 65 Years 63
Both planes, FiFi and DOC, are based in the middle of the country. FiFi is in Dallas with the Commemorative Air Force (CAF), and DOC in Wichita. Both organizations wished him sincere congratulations on the milestone across their social media pages.
As of the end of August, Novak had 331 hours flying FiFi, and 669 hours flying DOC. Both bombers tour the country each year supporting various events, attending select air shows, meeting veterans and selling rides to the public.
Novak is an Air Force veteran and Flew the B-1, among other types
B-1B onn a Bombing Run. Photo: USAF
Novak graduated from the Air Force Academy in 1984. According to the CAF, he trained in T-37s and T-38s at Vance AFB and began operational service in Learjets at Offutt AFB as CINCSAC’s instructor pilot.
He later flew supersonic B-1 Bombers at Dyess AFB as a Formal Training Unit instructor, and eventually returned to the AF Academy as an officer and instructor pilot. He retired as a KC-135R evaluator pilot with the Nebraska Air National Guard, after nearly 28 years of service.
Novak has exceeded 1000 flight hours in numerous aircraft
The B-29 is actually the 5th aircraft type that Novak has flown over 1,000 hours. He has logged over 1,900 hours in the KC-135, 1,500 in the C-21, 1,400 in the B-1, and 1,200 in the T-6. He also owns and flies a T-6, a BT-13, and a Cessna 120.
DOC and FiFi together. Photo: Mike Killian
“Within the CAF, Novak has held multiple leadership roles,” said the CAF in a Facebook post. “He led the West Texas Wing, spent 11.5 years on the General Staff, and served 1.5 years as Chief of Staff. He also directed operations for 2 years and now sits on the CAF Foundation Board of Directors. A command-rated CAF pilot, he has flown the L-5, BT-13, T-6, A-26, B-24, and B-29, and was previously a member of the Standardization and Evaluation Committee.”
Let’s wish Mark a heartfelt thank you, and congratulations on his B-29 milestone. Here’s to the next 1,000!
Click here to see if FiFi will be visiting your neck of the woods soon, and click here for DOC.