Home Blog Page 118

Could Automation Kill Us?

0

Automation is best deployed as an enhanced decision making tool, not something which a bored human being should be tasked to sit and watch.

“When we design our systems, we need to assign appropriate roles to the human and technological components. It is best for humans to be the doers and technology to be the monitors, providing decision aids and safeguards.” – Captain Sully Sullenberger

The past week has seen several high profile aviation incidents come to light. The first one was a preliminary accident report on the crash and fire which destroyed an Emirates Boeing 777 in Dubai last August. The second was the release of the final report by the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) regarding an AirAsia Airbus A330-300 enroute from Sydney to Malaysia last year which suffered navigation and other system failures as the result of erroneous input by the pilots during preflight.

The Emirates crash tragically took the life of a responding fireman, while the AirAsia incident caused no injuries but did result in a diversion. Each incident had the potential for great loss of life, though. The improper use of automation can be implicated in both the Emirates and AirAsia events. Let’s take a look at each of these and see if we can draw some parallels.

Emirates 521

The crash report on the Emirates flight, released by the General Civil Aviation Authority (GCAA) of the UAE details that the approach was flown by the captain. The autopilot was disconnected for the landing while the autothrottles remained engaged. The aircraft experienced a longitudinal wind component which changed from a headwind of 8 kts to a tailwind of 16 kts during the approach. As a result of the decreasing performance wind shift, the aircraft made a long touchdown.

An automatic system on the Boeing warned the crew about the long touchdown, and a decision was made to go around. So far so good. Going around rather than accepting a long landing due to shifting winds is the correct decision.

What happened next wasn’t so good. The nose was raised, the flaps were reset and the gear were retracted, but go-around power was not added until three seconds before the aircraft impacted the runway with the gear partially retracted. The post crash fire destroyed the aircraft entirely.

Adding power during a go-around is…or should be, instinctual. It’s considered aviation 101, or rather it used to be. Today’s highly automated aircraft, however, all employ autothrottles which automatically advance themselves when the “Takeoff-go-around” or TOGA button is pushed. This is how go-arounds are performed on automated aircraft.

The 777, however, has a feature which disables the TOGA button after touchdown. This makes sense as you don’t want the throttles to advance after landing in case of accidentally touching the TOGA button. After a normal landing, that is. There are times when a rejected landing, or go-around, occurs after touchdown. The reasons vary, but a landing can be rejected any time until the thrust reversers are deployed, even after the gear touch down.

This is what happened to the Emirates 777. It touched down, and then attempted a go-around without adding power. Questions remain as to whether or not the captain actually engaged the TOGA button but in any case, the captain should have manually pushed up the throttles for the go-around or ensured that the autothrottles automatically advanced.

Why would he not do that? Easy. It’s called negative conditioning or negative training. Go-arounds are routinely practiced in all airline simulator training programs, but go-arounds after touchdown are practiced much less frequently. Over time, muscle memory will expect the autothrottles to advance themselves during a normal go-around as they always do.

Put a pilot in a highly dynamic situation such as a windshear landing, and then perhaps throw in a non-routine distraction such as the automatic runway length warning, and voila, muscle memory takes over and the throttles don’t get pushed up. Automation, which is supposed to make flying easier and safer, might have helped make a crash such as this inevitable.

Air Asia X Airbus A330 (Photo by Kentaro Iemoto)
Air Asia X Airbus A330. (Photo by Kentaro Iemoto)

AirAsia X 223

On March 15 last year, an AirAsia A330 suffered multiple inflight malfunctions of  its navigational display systems rendering the aircraft incapable of either continuing to its destination in Malaysia, nor of returning to its origination point of Sydney due to low ceilings. The aircraft eventually landed uneventfully in Melbourne, which had clear weather.

Subsequent investigation revealed that the pilots made a data entry error during their pre-flight checks consisting of a single digit error in programming the aircraft’s location.

Modern navigation systems on today’s commercial aircraft are capable of guiding an airplane to a spot on the other side of the globe with accuracy down to several feet. But in order to know where to go, the computers on the airplane first have to know where they are. 

Part of the preflight process is to enter in the aircraft’s current location in the form of a latitude and longitude. The pilot entering this data made some sort of fat finger error which resulted in the actually entered position being thousands of miles away from the Sydney airport. So after the aircraft departed, discrepancies between where it actually was and where it believed it was caused the computers to crash resulting in a nearly complete failure of the navigational system.

After identifying and while attempting to fix the problems with the navigation systems, the crew compounded their problem by cycling two of their three flight computers to off and back on. This incorrect procedure resulted in the loss of other primary flight displays and rendered the aircraft incapable of flying even a simple approach back to Sydney necessitating the diversion to Melbourne.

Even after arrival at Melbourne, the aircraft had to make several attempts at a completely manual landing without the benefit of either the autopilot nor autothrottles. There is little doubt that flying a highly automated aircraft left the pilot’s manual flying skills in a somewhat rusty state, which is completely expected.

Airbus A350 cockpit (Photo by Joao Carlos Medau).
Airbus A350 cockpit (Photo by Joao Carlos Medau).

Automation: Friend or Foe?

Automation of commercial airliners is with us to stay. It provides many benefits and economies but there are problems with its deployment which contributes to accidents and incidents such as these. The old aphorism which states that computers just allow humans to make mistakes faster and with more efficiency certainly applies here.

Over reliance on automation is also well known to cause a deterioration in manual stick and rudder piloting skills, which go unmissed until they are needed. The crash of Asiana 214 in San Francisco several years ago was a perfect example of this.

But as Captain Sully warned in the quote above, automation is best deployed as an enhanced decision making tool, not something which a bored human being should be tasked to sit and watch, as it is today.

 

Like what you see?

Uncle Sam Needs You To Become An Aviation Cadet

0

A long time ago, you could go to the movie theater and not have to deal with 40 minutes of crappy movie previews.  Instead, you saw a newsreel that was focused on the war and an ad to sign up and go kick some Hitler and Tojo ass.

[youtube id=”kAsXaYLdxeo” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

This black and white video from the 1940s is a recruiting commercial for the Unites States Army Air Corps during World War II. It starts with the caption, “Attention Young Men.” It then shows cadets standing attention, while a voiced over narration explains that just a short while ago, they too were “average American boys from average American families.” Soon, they will learn how to pilot a plane, how to navigate, and eventually ship off to defend freedom.

Young men are told that if they are 17, they can sign up for the army reserve, and will be called soon after their 18th birthdays. Men between the ages of 18 and 26 are cordially invited to join the army to crush the axis powers. A row of muscle toned, shirtless cadets graces the screen, making young men everywhere want to be just like them.

“There are things to do and places to go,” chimes the narrator, “and the Army Air Forces will supply both, to whoever has the will to smack the enemy where it hurts the most.”

Most interesting are the planes of WWII, shown flying throughout the commercial. The marvelous AT-6 stands ready to challenge cadets to become real pilots.

If you are up for the challenge, you are encouraged to stop in the lobby on your way out of the theater, or to inquire at 607 Custom House, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. No phone number is given.

Are you up for the challenge?

WATCH: Relive Delta’s Last Flight of The Lockheed L1011 Tristar

0

Call us a sucker for a good Avgeek video, no matter how old or VHS looking it may be.  We’ll admit it. We have a bad habit of binge watching L1011 videos.  It’s almost as bad as twenty-somethings who just found out that a new season of “House of Cards” is released on Netflix.

[youtube id=”fqu-YEcl0e8″ width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Delta L1011 Tristar aircraft, manufactured by Lockheed, was magnificently designed but definitely had its faults too. It was a wide body, trijet airliner, with a seating capacity of up to 400 passengers.  In many ways it was an aircraft ahead of its time. It was on of the first airliners to be able to fly a CATIIIa ILS that allowed the jet to land in extremely poor weather conditions.  It also had many amenities that were previously only found on the larger 747. Some aircraft had a lower deck galley with lounge facilities. Unfortunately, it was also a commercial disaster.  The program was delayed which meant that the jet hit the market later than planned. Promised performance never materialized and the complexity of its systems made maintenance a challenge. Lockheed never turned a profit on the trijet. Its failure led Lockheed to exit the commercial aircraft market.

17097549 10211023591121791 8256074679473461690 o Mike Runnicles Lockheed
Image via Delta

Delta’s first L1011 arrived on October 3rd of 1973. It’s first revenue flight was on November 15th of that year, with 39 passengers onboard. Join in the retirement of the last Delta L1011 Tristar. The historic flight to Victorville, California happened the following day. A specially selected group of Delta employees accompanied the aircraft to its final resting place.

This plane was (and still is) loved by scores of avgeeks everywhere. Despite the adoration, Delta’s L1011 Tristar (ship number 728) was retired as the last L1011 passenger plane on July 31st of 2001, after serving for 28 years across 40 U.S. cities and 39 International cities.

10bl Delta Air Lines Lockheed L 1011 TriStar 250 N737D@TPA27.01.1998 6138548678 Aero Icarusa
Image via aero icarus

Traditionally, every airline service bids a final farewell to its retired planes, then flies them to the desert southwest for final storage and breakup.  The L1011 fleet met the same unfortunate end.

Sighting of an active L1011 is extremely rare today.  Of the 250 of this type of aircraft built between 1968 and 1984, the only active aircraft is flown by Orbital ATK.

How Do You Convert a C-130 Into a Firefighting Aircraft?

It’s a well known fact that C-130s are one of the tools that firefighters use in their arsenal to fight wildfires.  But how do they convert a standard Hercules aircraft into a MAFFS airplane?

This footage, which was published on September 11th of 2015, shows the MAFFS being added to a pair of C-130 Hercules aircraft. MAFFS is an acronym for the Modular Airborne Fire Fighting System. To put it simply, MAFFS is a giant water/chemical tank loaded into the cargo hold. It holds about 2,700 gallons of water. This is the best weapon the military has to combat fire. MAFFS is used in the C-130 aircraft of the Colombian Air Force, the Brazilian Air Force, the Royal Moroccan Air Force, and the Royal Thai Air Force.  While the C-130 is not the only aircraft that can drop chemicals or water on a fire, it has an advantage in that there are many C-130s where as larger tankers like the DC-10 or 747 are more limited resources.

Members of the 153rd Airlift Wing of the Wyoming Air National Guard are preparing two C-130 aircraft in Cheyenne, Wyoming, for MAFFS missions in the Rocky Mountain region.

The MAFFS program was established by Congress after the Laguna fire of 1970 overwhelmed available aviation firefighting resources. The idea of stuffing cargo planes with water tanks was meant to integrate military air tankers into the national response system. Today, MAFFS equipment is stationed at eight locations throughout the United States.

The MAFFS consists of five pressurized, fire retardant water tanks. The system can disperse all 2,700 gallons of water in five seconds over a fire. This produces a fire line that is 60 feet wide and a quarter mile long. Not only that, but all that water can be reloaded in only eight minutes.

[youtube id=”qtOVQf8LgCo” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

A C-141 Pilot Remembers the Time Mother (Now Saint) Teresa Boarded His Jet

0

The following story was written by Joe Blewitt, a retired C-141 Starlifter pilot about his experience meeting Mother, now St. Teresa of Calcutta. It was originally posted on Facebook.  Joe has graciously allowed Avgeekery to share his special memory.

The weekend of the canonization of Mother Teresa seems like the appropriate time to post this image, along with the story behind it. This picture of Mother Teresa was taken in July of 1991 in Tirana, Albania. I was blessed (literally) to be standing just to the right of Mother Teresa when this photo was taken. I was on my first overseas mission flying the C-141. Every mission afterwards had the misfortune of being compared to this one. I’d be hard-pressed to pick one that topped it – although there were many more incredibly memorable, in their own way.

In July of 1991, we were withdrawing troops and materiel from the Gulf War region. It was also a time when many former communist countries were moving towards democracy. The first open elections in Albania in 60 years took place on March 31, 1991. Prior to then, the country was basically cut off from all western influences. This new political climate created an opening for diplomatic ties between the U.S. and Albania, an extremely poor country – to the point of starvation in some cases.

There was a request from the new Albanian government for food. This connects back to the first part of the story – the end of the Gulf War and bringing home troops and materiel – which included massive amounts of unused MREs, since the ground war was much shorter than expected. The request for assistance was granted and we set up an “air bridge” from Sigonella Naval Air Station in Italy and shuttled MREs into Albania several times a day for a week.

What does this have to do with Mother Teresa? Albania is her birthplace. It was one of her lifelong goals to return and establish a mission in her home country. She happened to be there opening an orphanage and learned we were bringing in these supplies. She requested some MREs for her orphanage and the request was granted. Mother Teresa came out to the plane and helped unload the boxes. She didn’t hesitate at all and began picking up boxes and carrying them to her vehicle. She was one month shy of 81 years old, stood about 4′ 6″ – although she was technically 5′ tall. It was amazing to witness her in action.

I had the honor of giving Mother Teresa a personal tour of the airplane, walking her around the entire perimeter of the plane and then inviting her to come in and take a look around. As soon as we stepped inside the airplane, she blessed herself and began to pray. Everyone standing there joined her – as best they could – no matter their religion. She said the Our Father, The Hail Mary and The Glory Be, blessed the airplane, blessed our crew and thanked us for bringing the supplies. Then she signed our log book (AFTO 781 for all you Air Force types). It was a surreal experience to say the least. It’s hard to describe, but I knew then I was standing with a saint – amazing to see it as a reality today.

mothert
Mother Teresa was proclaimed a saint by Pope Francis in Rome on September 4th, 2016.

Three Gatling Guns, 6000 rounds Per Minute: The AC-47 Was One Bad Ass Plane

0

The Douglas AC-47 Spooky (also known as Puff the Magic Dragon) is one rough and tumble aircraft. Manufactured by the Douglas Aircraft Company, and introduced in 1965. It was developed from the C-47 Skytrain. There were 53 AC-47 Spooky aircraft produced. It is more than 64 feet long, with a wing span of more than 95 feet. It holds a crew of seven: pilot, copilot, navigator, flight engineer, loadmaster, and two gunners. The AC-47 has a cruise speed of 175 miles an hour, and a maximum speed of 235 miles an hour.  It wasn’t fast but it sure was deadly.

This footage shows fighter planes in action, including the Douglas AC-47 Spooky. Some other war planes used were the Phantom, the Corsair, the Intruder the F-111, the Thunder Chief, the B-52, and Skyhawk.  But take a look at the footage around :40 into the short clip.  You’ll see what those 6,000 rounds per minute look like as the tracers turn night into day and rain death upon the enemy below.

Primary users of the AC-47 included the United States Air Force (USAF), the Vietnam Air Force, the Royal Lao Air Force and the Colombian Air Force.

About the AC-47 Spooky

The Douglas AC-47 Spooky is a modified C-47 transport plane equipped with three gatling guns, each one capable of firing six thousand rounds of ammunition a minute. It was developed for the Viet Nam war, and designed for heavy ground attack and close air support. The Spooky flew only at night, but carried flares to light up enemy positions. It was especially valuable in defending bases against night time attack.

There are two air bases in Florida where the AC-47 Spooky is on display. They are the Air Commando Park at Hurlburt Field, and the Air Force Armament Museum at Eglin Air Force base near Valparaiso.

[youtube id=”JAFVuG2KQqk” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

This Is One Spooky Abandoned Airport

0

Nicosia Airport in Cyprus has been abandoned since 1974. Ever since the Turkish invasion on July 20th, all commercial activity had ceased. The airport, which was constructed in the 1930s, had been the scene of some heavy fighting between Turkey and Cyprus. After that, the United Nations Security Council declared the Nicosia airport a United Nations Protected Area during the battle. Both sides had to retreat more than 500 meters beyond the airport’s perimeter.

On August 16th of 1974, a ceasefire agreement was signed. At that point, the airport became part of the UN’s controlled Buffer Zone, separating the two warring communities on the island.

Nicosia airport has not been a fully functional airport since then. Still, the site supports active United Nations helicopters, and headquarters the UN peacekeeping mission in Cyprus. The airport is also used for international peace talks. The airport was, and is, owned by the British Ministry of Defense.

In 1975, both the Greek and the Turkish communities agreed to jointly reopen the Nicosia airport. However, talks regarding this matter did not progress smoothly. In fact, this video footage seems to show that they never did any remodeling after the war. The entire property is in ruins. See the derelict buildings. View the broke down planes. Listen to the jaw harp music twanging in the background. It is a spooky, lonely, trashy looking place.

This video also shows a few nice vintage photos from when Nicosia airport was open for business. It would bring a tear to the eye of any avgeek.  It’s a snapshot back to the airport scenes of the 1970s.

[youtube id=”k47m8OZkfug” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Relive The Glory Days of the American Airlines MD-80 MadDog With This Noisy Takeoff

0

Back in the early 1980s, American Airlines took a bet on the MD-80.  McDonnell Douglas was desperate for business.  American’s CEO at the time (Bob Crandall) negotiated a sweetheart deal that allowed American to establish hubs (and eventually a fortress hub like DFW) across the United States. After the acquisition of TWA, the fleet grew to approximately 370 in service at its peak. It  was the go to jet for short and medium routes until the 737-800 and eventually A320 series began to take over its duties in the mid-2000s.

By the end of 2019, American will have removed all of its MD-80s from service.

This video features a sleek, shiny, red, white, blue and silver Mad Dog 80 screaming down the runway on a hazy afternoon at San Jose International airport. View the surrounding office buildings and the beautiful mountains beyond. Notice how the plane’s wings are located near the tail, toward the end of a very long fuselage.

The MD-80 featured in this video, with tail number N557AN, was retired  in 2015.

About the MD-80

The MD-80 is twin engine, single aisle, narrow body commercial jet airliner, manufactured by McDonnell Douglas, and later by Boeing. It is a mid size, medium range airliner. This slender aircraft has a number of variants, including the MD-81, the MD-82, the MD-83, the MD-87, and MD-88. The MD-80 can seat anywhere from 130 to 172 passengers, depending on the variant. Each variant also features upgrades in the cockpit and avionics.

The aircraft took its maiden voyage on October 18th of 1979. However, two MD-80 aircraft were severely damaged during the test flights. Despite the early design issues, the MD-80 underwent improvements. The first variant of the MD-80 was introduced with Swissair in October of 1980. The MD-80 series was eventually modified into the MD-90 series.

Almost 1,200 MD-80 aircraft were built between 1979 and 1999, at a unit cost in the 40 million dollar range.

[youtube id=”7lTiEcBhv9o” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Antonov An-225 Mriya Was Huuugge!

Was bigger better? In the case of the Antonov 225 heavy cargo jet, I think it was!  After all, 6 soul-shaking jet engines screaming at full power is always a rush. The video is the taxi (back-taxi on Rwy 16 at ZRH) and takeoff of a flight from Zurich, Switzerland. The plane is an An-225 Mriya (In Ukrainian, mriya means dream, or inspiration). The An-225 Mriya (Cossack) was the only one of its kind ever built. A second airframe was partially constructed, but production was halted due to lack of funding. An agreement between China and Ukraine was signed at one point to explore China producing additional copies in the future.

About the An-225

The An-225 was a strategic airlift cargo plane, designed in the Soviet Union in the 1980s. It was originally intended for transporting the Buran space shuttle for the Soviet Space Program, which is why the plane loaded cargo through its nose. The pressurized cargo hold was 46,000 cubic feet in volume. After its military missions were completed, the An-225 was put on hold for about eight years, then it was reintroduced as a plane that could carry oversized cargo loads. 

The An-225 was the longest and heaviest plane ever built, and powered by six turbofan engines. Its landing gear system had 32 wheels, and the plane was equipped with a twin tail design. It also had the largest wing span of any plane in operational service. The An-225 was destroyed on 24 February 2022 by invading Russian forces at Hostomel airport in Ukraine.

[youtube id=”gwDhsgSeXc4″ width=”800″ height=”440″ position=”left”]

Cover photo by: Alex Beltyukov

WATCH: How Boeing Built Their Legends

0

Classic Video Looks at the Certification Process for the 727 and 747

When Boeing built the revolutionary 727 and 747, it had to develop equally revolutionary ways to test and certify the advanced aircraft. Boeing faced a number of challenges along the way. Spray patterns of the 727’s tires could have quenched the outboard engines. A redesign was necessary to prevent potential flameouts. The 747 also faced a number of challenges.  One was a surprising difficulty when starting engines in windy conditions.  The turbofan engines would overheat if there was a tailwind during starting. The engineers had to devise a way to overcome these challenges…and they did.

This video is a Boeing documentary was released way back in 1990. It documents the test programs of the legendary 727 and 747 aircraft.  If you can get past the cheesy music, it’s a treasure trove of rare airplane facts for Avgeeks.

[youtube id=”uni6HVfthKs” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

About the 727

The loud, smokey Boeing 727 is a mid size, narrow body, three engine jet aircraft. It can carry up to 189 passengers. Between 1962 and 1984, 1,832 Boeing 727 jets were manufactured. All of them had three Pratt & Whitney JT8D engines, located below the T-shaped tail. The 727 was not exactly the perfect jet. In fact, airport noise regulations have led to all remaining 727s being fitted with “hush kits”, much to the disappointment of plane watchers who love loud noises. The Boeing 727 was built with three engines. Also included in its design was an emergency exit door at the back of the plane that also served a dual purpose as a tailstand to prevent tipping during loading. The 727 is now in limited service for cargo and private transport.

About the 747

The Boeing 747 is a wide body commercial jet aircraft, often referred to as a Jumbo Jet, or Queen of the Skies. It has four engines, and can accommodate as many as 400 passengers. The Boeing 747 was introduced in 1970 to Pan Am Airways. Its primary users today are British Airways, Korean Air, Lufthansa, China Airlines and various cargo operators. As of July 31st of 2016, there have been 1,523 Boeing 747 jets manufactured.


Lufthansa Makes The Queen Of The Skies Look Good!

0

This video footage takes us “backstage” at Lufthansa, where a Boeing 747-8 sits idle in a giant hangar. Then the action takes us onto the plane, giving a glimpse into the latest and most likely last generation 747 Jumbo Jet.  Although the video is short in length, it’s amazing to get a glimpse into how far the Queen of the Skies has advanced since it’s debut in the late 1960s.  Her lines remain nearly as graceful.  Her engines and wings have evolved but the essence that evokes luxury travel remains.

Lufthansa is a German airline that visits 220 destinations. In 2014 alone, Lufthansa carried more than 106 million passengers. With more than 120,000 employees, Lufthansa is the largest German airline. Their fleet consists of 270 aircraft, not even including all of their subsidiaries. Many of these aircraft are Boeing 747-8 models.

About the Boeing 747-8

The Boeing 747-8 is a wide body jet airliner, with two main variants – a passenger version and a cargo version. The 747-8 was introduced to Lufthansa on June 1st of 2012. Its primary users are Lufthansa, Korean Air, Cathay Pacific Cargo, and Cargolux. The plane has been in production since 2008. The unit cost of a Boeing 747-8 is nearly 380 million dollars. As of June 2016, there are 125 confirmed orders – 74 of the freighter version and 51 of the passenger version.  The next Air Force One fleet will also be a derivative of the 747-8i aircraft.

[youtube id=”JsKxT9m8CeI” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Fly West, Baby Boeing: Retirement of a 737 Classic

0

For the working class it’s inevitable. Whether you’re a white collar executive or a blue collar plumber, there will come a time when you take your last day’s walk into work.The same goes for hard working aircraft. All aircraft, whether they are a single engine Cessna 172 or a twin engine Boeing 737, will eventually take their final flight.

This is a story about the latter. A working class aircraft in itself. The classic Boeing 737-500. Southwest Airlines was the launch customer for the 737-500, taking delivery of the very first one on February 28, 1990. Designated the 737-5H4 (H4 being Boeing’s order code for Southwest) and built to directly replace the aging 737-200 fleet, the self-appointed “LUV airline” would eventually order only twenty-five of these smaller 737s due to an ever increasing demand for longer haul flights and more passenger space. Two of these 737-500s, N507SW and N501SW, would even take on the very prestigious role as Southwest’s “Shamu Two” and “Shamu Three” respectively. Along with “Shamu One”, a 737-3H4 (N334SW), these three aircraft were painted in the now iconic “Killer Whale” livery that became famous with passengers.

IMG_20160829_192410615_HDR-01

Southwest Flight Attendant Uses Every Looney Tunes Character To Welcome Passengers To Chicago

0

Southwest Airlines flight attendant Zach Haumesser is a man that obviously enjoys his job. Instead of going through the motions, he put his heart and soul into his duties. On a recent flight into Chicago Midway, Zach is captured on video making a very unique arrival message to passengers.  He did the entire announcement as if the entire Looney Tunes gang was onboard the jet. The impersonation is quite good…scary good.

Southwest Airlines is known for a lighthearted attitude.  This isn’t the first humorous Southwest flight attendant.  Back in 2015, we posted a flight attendant whose pre-departure safety message also went viral. Kudos to Zach for making the fly experience a little more fun.  That is unless you probably happen to be a flight attendant who has to do a three day trip with him.  Then that schtick would get annoying!

[youtube id=”sCVV4pRmvFE” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Kaboom! Incredible Video of SpaceX Rocket Explosion On Launch Pad

SpaceX rocket explodes during routine test.

On Thursday, September 1st, the Space X Dragon rocket was preparing to undergo a routine pre-launch test firing.  The rocket and payload were destroyed in the explosion.

The rocket was supposed to carry a communications satellite to orbit. The satellite was built by an Israeli firm and contracted for Facebook.  The estimated cost of the payload was $200M.  Future SpaceX launches will be paused while an investigation into the cause will take place.  This is not the first incident for Elon Musk’s company. Last year, another SpaceX rocket exploded during ascent.

The video was posted by USLaunchReport.com.  The explosion begins at 1:10 into the video.

[youtube id=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BgJEXQkjNQ” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

The Boeing 777 is One Damn Sexy Plane

0

Visible wingtip vortices make for one amazing approach into Frankfurt, Germany.

This video footage features a Boeing 777 from Singapore Airlines making an approach to Frankfurt Airport in Germany, on a drizzling early evening. The sky looks like an impressionist painting. Note those amazing, huge wing vortices.  Those vortices are beautiful but they also can be dangerous.

Vortices create what is known as wake turbulence.  They are effectively horizontal tornadoes coming off the “dirty” wing configured with full flaps for the approach.  The vortices are so strong that they could flip an aircraft.  The Boeing 777 is considered a heavy aircraft.  Controllers ensure at least 3 minutes of separation between the arriving aircraft and those that follow it.

About the Boeing 777

The Boeing 777 (also known as “the Triple Seven”) is a long range, wide body, twin engine jet that has quite a few variants. These include the 777-200, the 777-200ER, the 777-200LR, the 777-300, and the 777-300ER. These jets are basically different lengths and hold different numbers of passengers.

The Boeing 777 is the world’s largest twin jet, with twelve wheel landing gear (six wheels underneath each side of the plane) and a seating capacity of anywhere from 350 to 450 passengers. Its powerful turbofan engine has the largest diameter of any commercial aircraft. The Boeing 787 Dreamliner shares some of the same design features with the Boeing 777.

The 777 was designed to replace older wide body airliners. It flew its maiden voyage on June 12th of 1994, and was introduced with United Airlines on June 7th of 1995. It is considered a relatively fuel efficient alternative to other wide body jets. Its primary users are United Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Emirates and Air France. As of July of 2016, there have been 1,417 Boeing 777s manufactured. Despite that the unit cost ranges from 260 million to 300 million dollars, the Boeing 777 has received more orders than any other wide body airliner.

The Boeing 777 also holds the record for the longest distance flown non stop by a commercial aircraft.

[youtube id=”sYMmaGYjoSM” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Better than Autopilot: NASA Makes Strides toward Self-Aware Aircraft

AV-AA027_SMARTP_J_20160706182344[1]
T-1 a 5.5% scale aircraft that is testing self-awareness capabilities for NASA.

NASA Makes Strides toward Self-Aware Aircraft

What would it take for an aircraft to be fully autonomous, to the point that you could step into an aircraft—like a taxi—and tell it where you needed to go, then simply sit back, relax, and, in a reasonable time, arrive at your destination, safe, sound, and unruffled?
NASA, working with partners like Boeing, Honeywell, and General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, is making baby-steps toward that goal.
The key word in this process is “self-aware.” This concept may eventually allow unmanned aircraft (i.e., no pilot at the controls, even remotely) to routinely fly in the nation’s airspace—sharing it with piloted airlines and the rest of us who want to do our own flying.
To be “self-aware,” the aircraft must be able to autonomously “sense and respond.”

A basic flight element that all pilots are familiar with are aerodynamic stalls. From their first lessons, pilots are taught to recognize and avoid or recover from stalls. Most aircraft have some form of stall warning—a horn, angle-of-attack indicator, or stick shaker, etc. In a self-aware, autonomous aircraft, it would not only detect an impending stall, but react immediately to prevent the stall. (Actually, it would never let the aircraft get into a situation even approaching a stall.)

NASA's GTM-T2 In Flight
NASA’s GTM-T2 In Flight

This technology has been demonstrated by NASA as part of their Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration into the National Airspace system (UAS-NAS) project. In a series of tests, NASA and its partner, Boeing built and tested 5.5% scale model of what could be a Boeing 757—they call it the GTM-T2. The T2 flyable model was equipped with a digital system to prevent stalls and other un-flyable states. Using remote controls, pilots tried to make the aircraft stall or otherwise make the aircraft lose control. The system was consistently able augment the pilot’s control and maintain stable flight. Through a variety of sensors, the aircraft was able to autonomously determine that the aircraft was approaching an unsafe flight condition, analyze the condition, and autonomously react with the proper responses, including deflection of flight controls, to recover and maintain stability.
Irene Gregory, senior technologist for advanced control theory and application at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal saying that eventually aircraft would be “smart enough that people will be able to get around in on-demand self-flying taxis.”
While that day is probably far into the future, she also suggested that a system like the one demonstrated on the GTM-T2 model could be approved for use in the next generation of all-new airliners as a safety backup; if approved by the FAA.

Another, critical capability of a self-aware aircraft is the ability to sense and avoid other aircraft. NASA has sponsored at least two different test programs in this area. For test aircraft, NASA used an unmanned Ikhana (an unarmed version of the Predator UAV) and a remotely piloted S-3B and. The S-3B will carry a safety pilot, but the pilot will not be flying the aircraft during the tests but could assume control if the situation required.

An Ikhana is an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) being used to demonstrate various autonomous operating systems.
An Ikhana is an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) being used to demonstrate various autonomous operating systems.

These aircraft were equipped with sense-and-avoid sensors and software. The aircraft are flown along a predetermined route. Manned aircraft were deliberately flown into the path of the test aircraft, simulating what might happen if two aircraft were converging with insufficient separation. After 40 flight tests, the Ikhana autonomous test aircraft demonstrated the ability to successfully and safely maneuver to avoid the conflicting aircraft traffic and safely return to course after every encounter. A total of 200 such encounters were planned for this phase of testing.

A NASA T-34, similar to the one shown, will be equipped with autonomous operating systems to fly, navigate, and avoid other aircraft. A safety pilot will be aboard.
A NASA T-34, similar to the one shown, will be equipped with autonomous operating systems to fly, navigate, and avoid other aircraft. A safety pilot will be aboard.

NASA S-B3 similar to one to be used to test autonomous sense-and-avoid technology.
NASA S-B3 similar to one to be used to test autonomous sense-and-avoid technology.

A follow-on test will use a T-34 plane equipped with a proof-of-concept control and communications system to test how well the digital systems control the aircraft, interact with air traffic controllers and remain well clear of other aircraft while executing a planned mission. With a safety pilot onboard, the aircraft will fly a typical mission complying with air traffic control and safely avoiding other air traffic.

These are only two elements for a fully autonomous “air taxi.” A complete flight will require the aircraft to plan the route, check for adverse weather, file a flight plan, communicate with and follow Air Traffic Control instructions, perform a safe flight, etc.—the same requirements a pilot would follow when conducting a flight. So, while NASA and the aerospace community are making significant progress in autonomous flight, there is still much work to be done.

For now, taxicabs will operate on four wheels with an occasional surly driver. A least an air taxi autonomous pilot will not expect a tip!

 

So How Do Jet Engines Work and Why Would One Blow Up?

0

Engines usually work well but when they stop working, they can make a big mess.

This past week a Southwest Airlines 737 suffered a very dramatic engine failure while on a flight from New Orleans to Orlando. It appeared as if the entire front of the engine came off judging from pictures taken from inside the cabin. The aircraft also suffered a rapid decompression which was most likely due to debris from the engine striking and puncturing a hole in the fuselage. Considering that the time of useful consciousness (TUC) at 31,000 feet is only one to two minutes, the crew did an outstanding job of prioritizing their emergency action responses and safely recovering the aircraft into Pensacola.

eng1failOn September 8th last year a British Airways 777 aborted its takeoff from Las Vegas after its left engine failed and burst into flames. The entire left side of the aircraft was engulfed in flames by the time emergency responders were able to put the fire out. Again, thankfully, no one was injured. The aircraft was later repaired and returned to service.

So in these two high profile incidents, jet engine failures caused very dramatic and potentially life threatening damage to commercial airline flights. But how do jet engines work in the first place and what would make one blow up? Is there any way to make engines safer or are these types of mechanical failures just something with which we’ll have to learn to live?

engine

Suck Squeeze Boom Blow

Modern turbine aircraft engines are simultaneously simple in operation, yet highly complex precision machines. Their operation, which can be simplified into the title of this paragraph, consists of four elements. Air is first drawn into the front of the engine and is next compressed by a series of blades rotating on a center spool.

This compressed air is then combined with fuel sprayed into the combustion chamber and ignited. The resulting flow of hot expanding gas flows over turbine blades also connected to the center spool and then exits at high speed providing thrust. The turbine blades provide power for the compressor blades and the process repeats.

The earliest jet engines were known as “pure turbine” engines where all the air from the inlet went through the hot section. Since then, large fans have been employed where only some of the air goes into the hot section but most of the thrust is created by the fan and bypassed around the core of the engine. High bypass engines are now the standard on airliners though pure turbines are still used on military aircraft.

And that’s it. Conceptually quite simple and very few moving parts.

What Could Go Wrong?

The truth is that because jet engines have so few moving parts in comparison to other types of engines, there is very little actually to go wrong. The problem is that when things on a jet engine do go south, they can make a big mess as seen in the two above mentioned incidents.

As far as the central operation of the compressor-turbine assembly is concerned, metal fatigue and subsequent failure are the primary culprits. Investigation of the BA 777 incident revealed that the spool in the high pressure section of the compressor had failed and parts of the compressor spool and blades were subsequently thrown through the engine case and cowling.

A similar metal failure was implicated in the crash of United 232 back in 1989 which claimed 111 lives. Thankfully, advanced metallurgy and inspection technologies make these types of problems quite rare.

The speculation of what caused the failure of the Southwest Airlines engine ranges from mechanical failure of the fasteners which keep the structure attached to possible failures of the engine anti-icing system which is located in that area. An NTSB investigation is ongoing,

Simple and Yet Complex

While the operating principles of jet engines are simple, many of the technologies used to make them work are quite complex. The metallurgy used in building the fan and compressor blades is state of the art. These structures are mostly made of titanium which while being extremely strong and flexible is notoriously difficult to cast. Titanium castings are required to be forged in a vacuum as any air can induce impurities resulting in cracks in the metal.

The tolerances required inside the fan and compressors of jet engines are extremely fine. Modern jet engines even have what is known as an ablative coating around the primary fan which is designed to wear away as the fan blades expand through heating. This keeps the gap between the fan and its housing as small as possible for efficiency.

As you might imagine, any solid object which is ingested by a jet engine can cause havoc. Any damage to the compressor section of a modern jet engine can cause what is known as a compressor stall which is a major disruption in airflow. When the airflow is disrupted, the fire can go out or be severely restricted. This is how Sully and his passengers ended up in the Hudson river courtesy of a flock of Canadian geese.

I should add a note about all the auxiliary components that, while not central to the operation of a jet engine, are attached to the engine in what is known as an accessory drive unit. It is located either beneath or on the side of the engine yet inside the cowling. Things like hydraulic pumps for the flight controls, generators and fuel control units are driven through a drive shaft powered by the main turbine. Problems with these components may or may not result in engine failure depending on the affected component and the nature of the failure.

In Conclusion

Modern turbine engines are models of efficiency and simplicity. They are highly reliable power plants and yet, like any machine, subject to occasional failure. That they fail so infrequently given the extreme conditions in which they operate is a testament to their design and upkeep.

Like what you see?

Read more of Captain Robert’s work at:

Lucky Pilot Makes IFR Approach To Avgeeks’ Favorite Airport In The Caribbean

Cirrus_SR22_IFR_approach_at_St__Maarten__-_YouTube

Even on a cloudy day, St. Maarten looks stunning.

We at Avgeekery love St. Maarten. We were pretty sure we’ve seen every avgeek video about St. Maarten…well except this one.
This video footage features a pilot’s perspective of an approach to St. Maarten in instrument conditions (aka IFR). The pilot flies a Cirrus SR-22. We’re pretty sure he felt like the luckiest guy in the world on this approach.

The pilot does not see anything other than grey clouds until about four minutes and twelve seconds into the footage. He’s in the soup.  At about four minutes and forty seconds, ground begin to appear, as raindrops hit the plane’s windshield. At around the five minute mark, the pilot can spot the runway. He’s ‘visual’. As the pilot approaches the runway, he has to see the crowd below him, disappointed that it’s just a ‘prop job’ and not a giant airliner like the 747. Nonetheless, the plane comes in for a gentle landing.

About the Cirrus SR-22

The Cirrus SR-22 is a lightweight, single engine aircraft with four or five seats. It is a civil utility aircraft that has been in production since 2001. The Cirrus SR22 is manufactured by Cirrus Aircraft of Duluth, Minnesota. Since 2004, the SR22 is the world’s best selling single engine, four seater aircraft. This could be due to the SR22’s built in emergency parachute system. In fact, the SR22 has become known as “the plane with the parachute.”

As of 2013, there have been 4,365 Cirrus SR-22 aircraft manufactured. The per unit cost of the SR-22 is about half a million dollars.

[youtube id=”UOknUgdl79I” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

 

Massive Dreamlifter 747 Keeps 787 Program Running

Boeing’s largest aircraft, the Dreamlifter (by volume), keeps the 787 program humming

The Boeing 747 Dreamlifter is a modified wide-body cargo aircraft from the Boeing 747-400. Its unusual shape resembles the Oscar Meyer Weiner mobile or a beluga whale. The Dreamlifter boasts the world’s largest cargo hold at 65,000 cubic feet. It uses the world’s longest cargo loader to receive cargo. Boeing uses it exclusively to transport 787 Dreamliner parts to assembly plants. The Dreamlifter plays a crucial role in Boeing’s global supply chain.

Introduced in 2007, the Dreamlifter carries oversized cargo for the 787 program. Boeing has manufactured four Dreamlifters, all converted from 747-400s. The swing-fuselage allows removal of large 787 parts in one piece. This unique feature sets the Dreamlifter apart from other cargo planes. The aircraft’s massive size enables efficient transport of bulky components. Boeing’s innovative design has revolutionized aerospace logistics. The Dreamlifter continues to support Boeing’s manufacturing processes worldwide.

Dreamlifter is a Frankenstein of engineering

Boeing 747 400LCF Dreamlifter
Massive Dreamlifter 747 Keeps 787 Program Running 16

The Boeing 747 Dreamlifter was conceived when it was realized the the shipping of airplane parts is time consuming, especially when large pieces like wings and fuselages have to travel between Japan, Italy, and America’s east and west coasts. With the new aircraft, the time it takes to get airplane parts of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner from Japan to America is reduced from 30 days to just 8 hours.

Between its first flight in 2006 and its FAA certification, the Dreamlifter aircraft completed 437 hours of flight testing, and 639 hours of ground testing. The Boeing 747 Dreamlifter LCF was granted FAA certification on June 2nd of 2007.  

The aircraft now flies regularly between Japan, Italy and the US to deliver parts.  You can commonly see the aircraft at US airports near Seattle, Charleston, S.C and Wichita, Kansas.

[youtube id=”X7xvXHgZt0g” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]

Did You Know The T-37 Tweet Is Still Flying?

People still fly those things? Apparently so.

Ever since the creation of Pakistan, the Paks and the Turks have been BFFs. This video features a shining example of the fact. This documentary exemplifies the friendship between nations, and how it is stronger than ever. In October of 2015, Pakistan acquired a number of Cessna T-37 Tweet aircrafts from the Turkish government.

In the spring of 1952, the United States Air Force (USAF) called for a lightweight, two seater aircraft that could be used for training purposes for cadets at air force bases. Cessna responded with the Cessna T-37 Tweet, a small, economical trainer aircraft. The Tweet took its first flight in October of 1954, and was introduced for service in 1957.  It flew for more than fifty years in the United States Air Force, as well as in the Royal Moroccan Air Force, the Colombian Air Force, and the Turkish Air Force. The T-37 was retired by the Unites States Air Force in 2009, but is still in service.

About the T-37 Tweet:

The T-37 jet is a twin engine jet aircraft with side by side seating.  The Tweet is characterized by a low, straight wing, with the engines tucked underneath the wings, and a “clam shell” canopy, hinged to open toward the rear. The plane also features ejection seats and tricycle landing gear. The control panel of the T-37 was made similar to control panels of other USAF aircraft of the era.

There were 1,269 Cessna T-37 trainer jets manufactured between 1955 and 1975. However, these jets are new to the people of Pakistan.

[youtube id=”zcbLaVB9suc” width=”800″ height=”454″ position=”left”]